+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CCCHAP-MN HepatitIs Update

CCCHAP-MN HepatitIs Update

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: skah
View: 22 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
CCCHAP-MN HepatitIs Update . Presented by Cheri Booth, MPH MN Department of Health November 22, 2013. What is Hepatitis?. What is it caused by How is it spread Who is most affected What are the outcomes?. What causes hepatitis?. Hepatitis is basically inflammation of the liver. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
17
CCCHAP-MN HEPATITIS UPDATE Presented by Cheri Booth, MPH MN Department of Health November 22, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

CCCHAP-MN HEPATITIS

UPDATE Presented by Cheri Booth, MPH

MN Department of HealthNovember 22, 2013

Page 2: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

WHAT IS HEPATITIS?• What is it caused by• How is it spread• Who is most affected• What are the outcomes?

Page 3: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

WHAT CAUSES HEPATITIS?

Hepatitis is basically inflammation of the liver. (hepat-) = liver, (-itis) =

inflammation Many things can cause hepatitis:

Caused by viruses, alcohol, medications, and other toxins

Can also be caused by genetic conditions or co-morbidities

Page 4: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

HOW IS HEPATITIS SPREAD VIRAL hepatitis is spread from person to

person or from the environment. Exactly how depends on which hepatitis virus. Hepatitis A – food borne, and to a much

smaller degree sexual or IDU Hepatitis B- blood, sex, perinatal Hepatitis C (has 24 different genotypes!)

Blood, and to a much smaller degree perinatal or sexual

Hepatitis D- ‘piggy back virus’- blood, sexual Hepatitis E- same as type A Hepatitis G- very similar to ‘C’

Page 5: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

WHO IS MOST AFFECTED? HBV- In MN it is primarily persons born in

endemic areas who relocate here. Transmission often occurs at birth. Or in early adulthood by blood, sexual contact, or unsterilized/ contaminated medical supplies.

HCV- Approx 5.5 million Americans infected. Highest prevalence is among ‘Baby Boomers’. Related to blood exposures such as transfusion in the

days before the virus was isolated as well as military exposures.

Most aren’t aware of status. HCV- Greatest incidence is among persons who

inject drugs. More often in <30’s. Related to opioid addiction and injection use trends.

Page 6: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

OUTCOMES HBV- If infected at birth or in childhood

outcome is nearly always chronic infection. Adults tend to clear the virus in 85% of infections. High rates of cirrhosis and liver cancer for chronically infected.

HCV- Majority of those infected become chronic cases (~70%). Greatest indicator for liver transplant in the US. Most with lifelong infection will develop some level of fibrosis and or cirrhosis. Liver cancer rates rising dramatically.

Page 7: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

HEP C IN MN• How many Minnesotans are

affected by HCV• Which populations or locations

are experiences higher burden of infection?

Page 8: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

HCV INFECTED PERSONS IDENTIFIED THROUGH PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE IN MN THROUGH 2012

**http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/fact.htm

*Includes all acute, chronic, probable chronic, and resolved cases.

HCV infected persons* identified through passive surveillance

Estimated unidentified HCV infected persons

39,303

45,559

N=84,863**

Data Source: MN Viral Hepatitis Surveillance System

Page 9: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

PERSONS LIVING WITH HCV IN MN BY AGE, 2012

Median Age: 55

Data Source: MN Viral Hepatitis Surveillance System

Page 10: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

*Includes anonymous methadone patients

PERSONS LIVING HCV IN MN

BY GENDER*, 2012

Data Source: MN Viral Hepatitis Surveillance System

Page 11: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

PERSONS LIVING WITH CHRONIC HCV IN MINNESOTA BY RACE, 2012

Afr Amer = African American /Black Asian=Asian or Pacific IslanderAmer Ind = American IndianOther = Multi-racial persons or persons with other race

Page 12: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

PERSONS LIVING WITH HCV IN MN

RATES (PER 100,000 PERSONS*), 2012

*Rates calculated using 2010 U.S. Census data

Excludes persons with multiple races or unknown race

Data Source: MN Viral Hepatitis Surveillance System

Page 13: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

TRENDS IN HEPATITIS C IN THE US Young (under 30) people have had a

significant increase in rate of HCV infection.

Future implications related to morbidity and mortality, perinatal transmission of HCV, and treatment costs.

Opioid addiction and heroin purity in MN leading to greater issues of addiction, unsafe injection behavior, and overdose.

Page 14: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

INCREASING MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY RELATED TO HEPATITIS C

HCV is a major cause of liver disease– Leading indication for liver transplantation– Leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma

(HCC) (approx.50% of HCC incidence) Over the next 40-50 years, a projected:

– 1.76 million with untreated HCV infection will develop cirrhosis– 400,000 will develop HCC– 1 million will dies from HCV-related complications

Substantial HCV-related costs1– Exceeds $5 billion annually– 2010-2019 estimated costs total $54.2 billion

1 McGarry et al. “Economic Model of a Birth Cohort Screening program for Hepatitis C” Hepatology 2012; 55:1344-1355

Page 15: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

TAKING ACTIONThe role of community planning/ HIV advisory committees in the fight against viral hepatitis

Page 16: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

HIV AND HCV- IF THE SHOE FITS…. Natural cross-over between populations

affected and how prevention and linkage to care work is done.

Ability to enhance existing services rather than recreate them. PCSI opportunity!

Rapid HCV test allows alignment with current HIV testing strategies and programs

Advocacy/ provision of care around hepatitis C testing and referral often strengthens inroads into difficult to reach populations in need of HIV services.

Page 17: CCCHAP-MN  HepatitIs  Update

INCORPORATION OF HEPATITIS Many states have incorporated Hepatitis into

their HIV community planning groups. Logical fit based on population overlaps,

funding goals, and federal imperative to incorporate/ collaborate services.

Challenging to operate even one advisory group. Adding a second would be a burden to communities already finding it difficult to participate.

Precedence and trend toward combining groups is seen across the nation. CDC, NASTAD NY, CA, MA, TX, CO, DE, VT, etc………………………..


Recommended