_ ^^ ' . ' . .

CDM Federal Programs Corporation-January 8, 1990

Ms. Gerallyn vailsEPA Work Assignment Manager . .841 Chestnut Building 6th floorPhiladelphia, PA 19107

PROJECT: . EPA CONTRACT NO.: 68-W9-0004

DOCUMENT NO.: TES7-C03Q17-EP-BLSK

SUBJECT: Revised Final Trip Report for Work Assignment C03017Stanley Kessler SiteTES7-C03017-FR-BKXZ-02

Dear Ms. Vails:

Enclosed please find the Revised .Final Trip Report which covers workcompleted ,to date on the Stanley Kessler. Assignment. This report addressesyour comments and contains the analytical data received from EFA's CentralRegional Lab (CRL) and the CLP labs. The CRL data is provided in appendixG-l, while, the CLP data, which contains only the BNA and TAL metals for theon-site Kessler. wells, is contained in Appendix

If you have any questions please .call Andrew Hopton or myself at (215)293-0450. .

Sincerely ,

CDM Federal PrgfcHpim Corporation

rk diFevregional

MdF/dmh

cc: Elaine Spiewak, EPA Regional Project Officer, CERCLA Region III (w/oattachments )Jean Wright, EPA TES VII Project Officer (letter only)Constance V. Braun, CDM Federal Programs Corporation program Manager(w/o attachments)

8 VaUeyFwge Executive Mall, Suite 230 Wayne, PA 19087 215293-0450

------RR3UU105-

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1,0 Introduction 1I.I Scope of Work 1

2.0 Field Operations 32.1 Results of the Well Survey 32.2 Active Residential and Industrial Supply Wells 52.3 Abandoned Industrial Supply Wells and

Monitoring Wells 82.4 Upper Merion Reservoir Sampling 102.5 Collection of Split Samples at the

Stanley Kessler Facility 132.6 Water Level Recorders 142.7 Laboratories 15

List of TablesTable I - First Priority Wells for Sampling 3Table 2 - Sample Numbers and Corresponding Depths 12

List of FiguresFigure 1 - General Well Location Map 4AFigure 2 - Upper Merion Reservoir Map 10AFigure 3 - Stanley Kessler Well Map 13A

List of AppendicesAppendix A - Sample InformationAppendix B - Well Data SheetsAppendix C - Well CharacteristicsAppendix D - Upper Merion Reservoir Photo LogAppendix E - Stanley Kessler Photo LogAppendix F - Stevens Recorder ChartsAppendix Gl - Analytical Results CRLAppendix G2 - Analytical Results CLP

SR300I06

INTRODUCTION

CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM FPC) received work assignment C03017in June 1989 and was tasked with providing EPA Region lit with enforcementsupport on the Stanley Kessler case. Specifically, this work assignmentinvolved assisting EPA's expert witness by collecting backgroundgroundwater data needed for trial.preparation. This work was to becompleted prior to the trial date set for November 14, 1989.

This work assignment was broken out into 6 phases or tasks.

Task 1 - involved conducting a well survey in the study area, whichincluded King of Prussia, Upper Merion, and Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.Well location that might provide background data had been chosen by agraduate student from the University of Pennsylvania who was working withthe expert witness. This initial survey was completed during the summer of1988.

CDM FPC conducted a second well survey in August 1989 to determine which ofthe chosen wells could be accessed and to gain permission for sampling fromthe property owners.

Task 2 - involved collecting samples from the .active home wells andindustrial supply wells. Samples were collected directly from the wellsthrough faucets and pump lines. Because all of the wells are operating, •removal of stagnate water (purging) was not required. Samples wereanalyzed for volatile organics and Target Analyte List (TAL) metals. Thiswork was completed during the week of September 4, 1989.

Task 3 - required sampling of the abandoned supply wells and monitoringwells; This work required the use of a, submersible pump to purge threewell volumes of water from each well. Samples were analyzed for volatileorganics and Target Analyte List (TAL) metals. This work was completedduring the week of September 18, 1989. . . . . . . .

(1)

flR300!07

Task 4 - replicated sampling in the Upper Merion Reservoir conducted byLeggette, Brashears, and Graham, Inc. in June 1980. Samples were collectedfrcm several depths at five different locations within the reservoir.Samples were analyzed for volatile organics only. This work was completedon September 12, 1989.

Task 5 - involved the collection of split samples from the monitoring wellslocated on the Stanley Kessler site. This sampling was originally set upto involve the collection of split samples from the PRP. Because the PRPdid not collect samples for full analysis, only a portion of the actualsample was split between the PRP's consultant and CDM FPC. CDM FPC'ssamples were analyzed for volatiles, TCL organics including PCBs andPesticides, and TAL metals and cyanide. _ . .

Task 6 - involved the placement of four water level recorders at welllocations, and the subsequent collection of data from these recorders overa 3-4 month period. This report presents data collected to date.

Ihe following sections of this report provide a detailed explanation of thework completed under each task as well as sample location maps for thevarious sampling rounds. Also included is a summary list of which wellswere sampled and a table listing all the samples collected under this workassignment with the corresponding locations.

(2)

AR300I08

2.0 FIELD OPERATIONS

i2.1 RESULTS OF WELL SURVEY

Ten priority wells and ten secondary wells were suggested for sampling by |the expert witness and his graduate student. For various reasons a numberof the wells could not be sampled. Table 1 lists the wells suggested bythe expert witness survey and describes the sampling status for each well.Figure 1 provided the locations of all the wells which were sampled duringthis study. The various sampling events are described in more detailbelow.

! TABLE 1FIRST PRIORITY WELLS FOR SAMPLING

WELL

32 AIRCO Well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

PSWCO Well has not been sampled at this time.previous PSWCO data indicated 3.0 ppb TCE and23 ppb Toluene. This well has an obstructionat 160' which completely blocks the well

6 DeRosato The Expert Witness suggested that this well bedeleted from the sampling program.

4 Deacon This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.IndustrialSupply

70 O'Hara School This well was sampled on September 20, 1989.Site Landfill . . . _ . . . . _

24 Estock Well Expert witness and EPA WAM decided this welldoes not need to be sampled because 1986 datais available on this well.

14 Matsunk Well was sampled on September 7, 1989.PollutionControl

(3)

' flR300IQ9

TABLE 1 (Continued)FIRST PRIORITY WELLS FOR SAMPLING

WELL » NAME ^ COMMENTS .

11 Davey Tree This well was sampled on September 19, 1989.

8 Basset Steel This well was not sampled. This property isTube currently owned by O'Hara Sanitation Company.

CDM FPC, O'Hara and O'Hara's consultantRemtech, were unable to locate this well onthe property or on the property blueprint.

9 Columbia This well was not sampled as the pump whichwas in place could not be removed or activatedfor use. ....

SECOND PRIORITY WELLS

WELL » NAME COMMENTS

5 Henderson Rd. This well was sampled on September 18, 1989.School

12 Falcone This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

13 Korba This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

34 Rossi • This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

16 440 Swedeland This is an abandoned home well. A sampleRoad could not be obtained as the pump is still in

the well and would have had to be pulled tocollect the sample.

25 Gulph Mills This well was not sampled. The well has abroken pump and would have had to be pulled toaccess the well with a bailer.

18 BFI This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

33 Bearoff Auto This well was sampled on September 7, 1989.

23 Pasquale . This well was sampled on September 7, 1989,

19 Valley Forge This well was not sampled. The water level inNursery this well was below 200' and could not be

sampled with available equipment.

flR300IIO

2.2 Active Residential and Industrial Supply Wells

Six active industrial supply wells and 3 home wells were sampled.onSeptember 7, 1989, All wells were sampled for volatile organic analysisvia EPA method 601/602. In addition several wells were sampled for TargetAnalyte Metals (TAL) Analysis. Samples for metals analysis were collectedto provide additional information on groundwater movement. Appendix Alists pertinent sample information including location, sample number,time/date, and type of analysis.

Because it was not possible to calculate the total volume of water in eachsystem, three volumes of well water were not removed from each well priorto sampling. This was not.required as most of the wells were in active useand fresh water was moving through the system. As, a precautionary measure,certain wells which were being used intermittently were turned on andallowed to run for ten minutes prior to sampling.

The following section describes the sampled wells, and provides informationon water use and industrial activity in the immediate area of the well.

Deacon Industrial Supply - Well #4

This well is located north east of the Upper Merion Reservoir. The well is223 feet._deep and supplies water for the bathrooms and coffee makers. Thissample was collected from an outside tap before the water flowed through afiltering and softening system. The pump had been in use for two hoursprior to sampling. The outside tap was turned on for ten minutes beforethe sample was collected. A VQA sample was collected at this location.

Deacon Industrial Supply is a supplier of pipe. No manufacturing is doneat this facility.

(5)SRSOOI 12

Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) - Well'-#18

This well is located east of the Kessler site and the Upper MerionReservoir, along the Schuylkill River. This well supplies water for truckwashing and the toilets. The water is.not used for drinking; no filteringor softening system is employed. This well is 200 feet deep and isoperated from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. A volatile sample was collected from atap that had been running for 10 minutes. The water had a definite odorsimilar to tar and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This facilityis a transfer station for BFI, however according to facility personnel acoke plant located south of the BFI property did dump wastes along RiverRoad for many years. This may explain the tar odor.

Bearoff Auto - Well #33

This well is located along the river east of the Upper Merion Reservoir andKessler sites and adjacent to the BFI Facility. This well is approximately200 feet deep and supplies water for washing and toilets. No filteringsystem is used on this well. A volatile sample was collected directly fromthe pump after it had been running for 10 minutes. This sample had anextremely strong odor similar to tar and coke wastes.

Matsunk Pollution Control - Well #14 :

This well is located east of the Kessler site and Upper Merion Reservoir,and west of the BFI and Bearoff plants. This well is operational, but itis not in use at the treatment plant. No information was available on thetotal depth or construction of this well. The pump was operated for 10minutes prior to sample collection. Both volatiles and metal samples verecollected at this well. This water was clear with no odor.

(6)flR300l 13

Pasquale - Well #23

This well is located south and east of the Kessler site, along SwedelandRoad. This well is 229 feet deep and supplies water to the pond andfountain located in front of the Pasquale office complex. During the weekof this sampling event, the pond was undergoing repairs and maintenance andwas being refilled during the actual sampling. Because the pump had beenoperating continuously for 4 days, no purging was required. This waste hada slight chemical odor. Samples for volatile and metal analysis werecollected at this well.

AIRCO Acetylene Facility - Well #32

This facility is located north of the Kessler site and to the west andadjacent to the Upper Merion Reservoir. This well is 705 feet deep with asufcsnersible pump set at 200 feet. This well supplies water to the gascompressor for cooling purposes, and is not used for drinking or washing.After startup in the morning this well operates 16 hours/day. Water is.pumped into a 2000 gallon storage tank. This sample was collected directlyfrom the pump prior to the water passing into the storage tank. Becausethe pump had been operating since 7:00 AM no purging was required. Thesample was collected for VOAs only.

Rossi - Well #34

This home well is located at 206 Crooked Lane, and is south east of thesite. No information on the total depth of this well is available. Thewell supplies water for drinking and washing. All water passes through awater softener. The sample was collected from an outside tap that had beenrunning for 10 minutes* Only a VOA sample was collected at this location.The potential effect of the water softener on the quality of the volatilesample was referred to Chuck Sands at EPA CRL. Mr.' Sands felt that thewater softener should have no effect on. any volatiles present in the well.

(7)

Korba - Well 113

This well is located next door to the Rossi Well, at 708 Crooked Lane.Total depth of this well is unknown. This well supplies water for drinkingand washing and also incorporates a softener through which all the waterpasses. This sample was collected from an indoor-tap after the pump ranfor 10 minutes. Mrs. Korba mentioned that their water had been tested bySuburban labs for TCE, with no levels being detected. According to ChuckSands of CRL, the water softener should have no effect on any volatilespresent in this well.

Falcone - Well 112

A third well adjacent to wells 34 and 13 was sampled. Depth of this wellis unknown. The sample was collected directly from the well prior to anysoftener or filtering system. The pump was operated for 10 minutes.

2.3 ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY WELLS AND MONITORING WELLS

During the week of September 18, 1989 CDM FPC personnel attempted to saznpleall of the abandoned supply wells and monitoring wells. Of the six wellsdesignated for sampling only the wells at Davey Tree, Henderson RoadSchool, and the O'Hara School Site Landfill were sampled.

The well at Columbia Boiler was not sampled due to an abandoned down holepwirp that blocked access to the well. Well #1 located on the PSWCO.property was blocked by an obstruction and could not be sampled. Inaddition, the abandoned well located at the Bassett Steel Facility was notsampled. Remtech and O'Hara personnel could not locate the well on theproperty or in the building blueprints.

All wells were purged prior to sampling with a Grundfos :submersible ,pump.Three well volumes were removed from each well. Well volumes werecalculated by determining feet o£ standing water. This number was thenused in the calculation: £*r2 x h x 7.5 = gallons in 1 volume, where h -feet of standing water.

(8)

BR3QQI 15

Ph and specific conductivity readings were taken as each volume was removedas an indication of whether groundwater was stable and representative.

The pump was lowered to an approximate depth of 90 feet in each well. Thiswas approximately 20 to 30 feet below the water level. Consequently waterwas being removed from the top of the column, drawing fresh water in frombelow. Both the Henderson Road School well and the O'Hara School SiteLandfill well produced sufficient water to keep up with the pump. TheDavey Tree Well did not recharge quickly and the pump had to be turned offand on to allow the well to recharge to the level of the pump. Seeattachment B, Well Data Sheets for specific purging information.

All purge water was disposed by pumping directly onto the ground;. Prior tosampling, the EPA.WAM had received permission to dispose of the water inthis manner from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources.This decision was based on the historically low levels of the TCE presentin all three wells.

Both the Davey Tree and Henderson Road School wells were not locked andcontained significant amounts of leaves and sticks which were probablythrown into the well.

All samples were collected with a stainless steel bottom loading bailer.Samples were collected from approximately 10 feet below the water level.

Bailer and lines were dedicated to each well and did not require -decontamination* The pump was washed off with alconox and water, andrinsed with Dl water, before using in each well.

Sample information including date, location and sample number is provided -in Appendix A.

(9)

fiRSOQI 16

2.4 UPPER MERICN RESERVOIR SAMPLING

On September 12, 1989 CDM FPC personnel conducted sampling of the UpperMerion Heservoir (UMR). This sampling attempted to duplicate the samplingconducted by Legette, Brashears and Graham, Inc. (LBG) on July 5, 1980 forthe Philadelphia Suburban Water Company. LBGs description of samplinglocations and the sampling map are included as Attachment 2 in the QualityAssurance Project Plan which is appendix H to this report. Because of thenature of the sampling, changes in the water level, and physical changeswithin the quarry; the exact locations and depth for each sample could notbe duplicated. However, the general locations were, matched with someaccuracy.

Andrew Hopton, Chris Cherniak, and Sandy Czarnecki of CDM FPC and EPA'sexpert witness Dr. Robert Giegengack were' present during the sampling. Dr.Giegengack observed the sampling and scouted the quarry for locations wheregroundwater discharges into the reservoir.

Sampling was conducted from a canoe, using LBGs sampling map and notes toreplicate the sampling locations. (See Figure 2, UMR Sampling Location Mapfor the locations of all samples).

Samples were collected at five different sample stations. At each station,samples were collected from six depths to provide a profile of thereservoir.

Total depth was measured at each location using a weighted 300 foot tape.Initial measurements showed that the water level was approximately 10 footlower than the July 1980 sampling. Because of this change in total depththe actual depths of each sample location could not be matched to those inthe LBG 1980 sampling trip. Samples were collected near the bottom of thereservoir, and then at approximately 20 foot intervals. Table 2 providesdepths and corresponding sample numbers. Complete sample informationincluding, date, time, sample number and location .are listed in Appendix A.

Samples were collected with a stainless steel specific depth sampler whichwas lowered on a nylon rope. The depth was measured by attaching the tapemeasure to the bailer. The specific depth sampler was decontaminated

(10)

&R3QQ117

BRYN MAHR, PA." </VSAMPLED LOCATIONS

IN THE UPPER HER ION RESERVOIR !/T ? . 3

Igure 2-9/12/89 Sample Locations

C1QA) "" " " ' " -'••'•'• »•»

between all locations by rinsing with ultra pure- DI water followed by arinse with the reservoir water. The rope was discarded after each stationwas completed.

Three VOA vials were collected at each depth. Appendix D providesphotographs of each location.

While inside the quarry. Dr. Giegengack noted several discharge pointsflowing out of the east wall into the reservoir. He requested a sample ofthis water as it seemed to be staining the rocks with a bright green color,This sample was collected, however after discussing the stream flows withPreston Luitweiler of PSWCO, it was discovered that this water is thereturn flow front the water company's micro filters. These filters removeplankton and diatoms from the reservoir water

Prior to shipping samples to the EPA laboratory, CDM FPC was notified thatthe lab could not process the total number of samples because they were .arriving in one shipment which exceeded the slots for that week. Afterconferring with Dr. Giegengack it was decided that two samples from theshallower depths, that did not have any reading during the 1980 samplingevent, be canceled. Consequently, samples UM4-05 and UM5-05 were not sentin with the other samples.

(ID

flR300I 19

TABLE 2-

UPPER MERION RESERVOIR

SAMPLE NUMBERS AND CORRESPONDING DEPTHS

STATION NUMBER = . - - - - - SAMPLE NUMBER DEPTH FROM SURFACE\

UM1 UMl-01 -109' (bottom)UMl-02 82'UM1-03 _60'UMl-04 40'UMl-05 20'UM1-06 , . 5'

UM2 UM2-01 90' (bottom)UM2-02 80'UM2-03 60'UM2-04 40'UM2-05 . 20'UM2-06 5'

UM3 . ...-UM3-01 76' (bottom)UM3-02 . 60'UM3-03 . 40'UM3-04 20'UM3-05 5fUM3-0.6 5' (Duplicate

ofUM3-05)

UM4 UM4-01 76' (bottom)UM4-02 60'

— UM4-03 , 40'UM4-04 20'UM4-05 5r

UM5 UM5-01 76' (bottom)UM5-02 60'UM5-03 40'UM5-04 20'UH5-05 . 5'

(12)

flR300I2'0

2.5 COLLECTION OF SPLIT SAMPLES AT THE STANLEY KESSLER FACILITY

On September 26, 1989 CDM FPC received split samples at the Stanley Kesslersite. Stanley Kesslers Consultant, Groundwater. Technology Inc. (GTI) wascollecting samples from on-site monitoring wells.

EPA had requested that CDM FPC obtain full organic and inorganic samplesfrom these wells. After arriving at the site, it was discovered that GTI -was not aware of the sampling scope, and was only collecting volatilesamples. GTI would not collect the additional portions of the sample soonly the VOA portion of each sample was a true split.

Samples were collected from four wells and the influent line to the on-siteair stripper. See Appendix A for a list of sample numbers andcorresponding locations. Figure 3 is a map of the Kessler site and showsthe location of the sampled wells.

GTI purged each well with a submersible pump.' Samples were collected withone stainless steel bailer that was lowered on nylon rope. The bailer wasdecontaminated between each location by steam cleaning, an alconox wash,and finally a DI water rinse. The pump was steam cleaned before it waslowered into each well. The pump hose and bailer lines were discardedafter use in the individual wells. ' "

The recovery well sample was collected directly from a valve on theinfluent line. Purging was not required as well is continually pumping.

Several problems were noted with GTI's procedures while observing theirsampling and purging activities. These are listed below. :

o In monitoring wells 2 and 5 the pump was lowered to a depth approximately18' and 35' below the respective water levels in the well. Because thepump was so deep, and no drawdown was observed in the well, there is somequestion as to whether the entire water column was removed. Consequentlythere may have been a layer of stagnant water at the top of the well. Asthe sample was collected from the top of the well the sample may not berepresentative.

(13)

flR300!2l

tIA Infiltration gallery /footer cesspool end septic tankA Existing well » *** JQQ f««i

1913

Exsiscins Wells On Stanley Kessler Site

(13A)flR300122

In order to check whether this problem was occurring, a sample of thepurge water was collected to be compared with the sample collected fromthe bailer. If the bailer sample has lower concentrations than the purgewater sample, it would indicate that the actual sample was taken from astagnant layer of water. This comparison may not be accurate asvolatiles may have been removed from the purge water as it passed throughthe pump.

o Three complete volumes were not removed from Monitoring Well #4. Becausethis well was not producing adequate water to keep up with the pump itbecame clear that removal of three complete volumes would take some time.The GTI site manager decided that the well had stabilized (meaning ph,specific conductivity, and temperature were constant over 5 minuteintervals) and that the sample could be collected. This data documentingthe stability of the well was not provided to CDM FPC by GTI. inactuality only 1 volume was removed from the well.

2.6 WATER LEVEL RECORDING

Continuous water level recorders were set up on 4 study wells. These wellsinclude:

o Columbia Boiler. #9o Davey Tree tilo Henderson Road School |5o Estock 124

Stevens recorders were set up on wells 11, 5, and 24. Initial water levels weremeasured with an ft-scope, and the recorders were set based on this level. Theserecorders were started on September 15, 1989 and were set on an 8-day clock,meaning the charts were changed every 8 .days. Copies of the actual recordercharts are included in Appendix F.

An In-Situ-Hermit SE1000B was set up on the Columbia Boiler well. This unit isequipped with a pressure transducer which measures changes in the water pressurewhich are then converted into water level readings. This unit was set up on

(14)

flR300i23

September 15 and has recorded readings every 8 hours. The initial set ofreadings from this unit were .lost during the transfer from the logger to apersonal computer. The unit was reset on October 13, 1989.

2.7 LABORATORIES

All of the volatile samples collected.in this study were to be analyzed usingEPA method 601/602 by: •

EPA Central Regional Laboratory (CRL)839 Bestgate Road . . . . . . . . . .Annapolis, Maryland 21401- . .

CRL also analyzed 7 metal samples for the Target Analyte list.

In addition to the 601/602 volatile analysis, the Stanley Kessler Split Sampleswere also analyzed for full Target Compound List Organics and Target AnalyteList for inorganics. These analyses were performed by the following EPA CLPlabs.

TCL Organics (BNA/Pesticide, PCBs)Western Research InstituteNinth & Louis StreetsLaramie, Wyoming 82070

T A L Inorganics a n d Cyanide . _ . . . . . .Skinner and Sherman Inc.300 Second Avenue . . .Waltham, MA 02254

Data was validated by EPA's ESAT contractor Weston Inc.

af* O f~l f~$ I IR3QOI2U

APPENDIX A

SAMPLE INFORMATION

SR300I25

w u0) fl)-P -PU-l IWnj (0Qi O.3 -3

Q) O <1)WC 1-4 Gu-t a> u-i a)-P jJTJ U-) TJ 4-135 o 95 o4J W 4J Wo o0) u <y u) O iH <l)fH .p H 4JO (0 O [0US O ?

... , 0)oV Cu wC tJQ) -HTJ W-H flJmm «

CJ

in 3* o ro (N o rn in

m m m m c o M « c o c o m

^ ^ ^ ^ X "_s: .'s ^ ^o o% o% cr> cr* err o> CT> en o

r$ m rr in • \o r* ooc t o o o o o o

oi Si to

ca o in m in oPO o in m m oco ff» r-i ro mm

.OT $Q CO 0 CO COCO CO O^ O fcD O

a

i i a a 3I s i l l<

iflR3QOI28

-P -PJ3S5OS T-( 10

£$ 01 r<) CN tN MO O O O O O§ s ^ ^ ^ ^ri ^ *-* •-* r-f rHO O O O O O\O \O - \O *£> \O VO

egCO• » - ; » 0 1*. C N - * r j * . C N ' » . o j•PrHO CNIO rOO ^CD LOO *£>»•r o c r t e c o c J ^ o c ^ C M c i t n^^J ^. 9<H^ 0<D^ o^ ooj o<uOT 7 "fl 71 7J "ft "1 -ft '-I - -H rH XJ -H rH XI« &*•{? -y &j-i - 9*4-1 jj &- •*-* QI-P -p Q«JJffi s & ni s cu <dSOt fl B d* IT? & Q* (d a QJEnigj jj(r}<n oJJoO jJinaj iJioii) oJina)DWQ CO U] Q tOWQ tOCOQ COtOQ tOCQQ

CT> in o - ^j, OT0^ fs] M CN<N eg tN CM rs

•cr» ch cri . . en o>^ ^ ^ ^ ^<N CM M <Nf f^H r H r - l - - - - - - - ^ r H

a\ <j\ <y> o en"

JH • M m ^r u-> voo o o o o oJi J. J. J. I I

3R300I29

0) grH

8 O "

i1

1it § "

•* *y <slsCU >•

e |

iiE-<

1§e

1

Hi O* O•p - -i-i

it Pt•H M ;

|l|1a? u « 5.Q O 0}

•tj O -W

rH rH r-H

totQ 4J g

PO 3: rH <W

C C X] 4J

•H O•P (U i>«JrH Ul ».*3 O R3 O •CO Qj 4J VO

OJOJ OJ OJ OJ O Olo o o o vo o\O VD VO "-O \. ID> > > ^> J^ 1>rH i— } rH rH CT> rHC3 C3 O O O O

i i l I i i

m

g-«H * m ^ m •* fo ^ ro ro-PrHVO OIO COO -sTO in*- M3t a r - C v o f i - ^ c o j c i n q-P® O<U O(W O^J OtlJ O(UtOr^JM -HrHJi -Hi— I-C! -Hi-HJi -iHi-H^i -HrH

g f3 4-5 3 0) jJrodj 4~J 3 0) 4-J m m 4J roE3COG tOCQQ tQCOQ tOCOQ tOWQ WtO

P-- rH f- - CO rH OO rH rH OJ m ^T

rH rH rH rH rH rH

CO CO CO CO OO COOJ 01 0} OJ 01 OJ

G CT> O ~OT Cn O

rH OJ ro 'O' Ln VOO O 0 O O O

oin ro

flR300i30

w2g•5ou

vj

I

1*•?S bJ5 ^•H C W-P & H

§1 S3~g §

^3 ^*ft M

1& && OM2yQJj

3ia£M£•*

1g

@

i

rH

5Sc*" 9i

rH 5rH Sg U

_ "O5^ub y-iJg O •

Q K0 01H CM-l i-i C7>0 G4J O-H0 T30 -PrH

U) -H-P (0 dOJ OJ £OJ^u-t ZJ a)3 ui

O O c«ro w J5

OJo*rHO\orf>

, .co•tH -4J rH ADfl r*4J <UWrH J3

Q,4J

S tO Q

Oin"*3*rH

ft

00OJ

Cft

o1

..: . _.

04O

*rHCDVD<J

>

*

• *oa og \ oo-HrHil-P Qj-M2§ G<

(0 OJtO CO Q

Cftinj*rH

Cft

*OJS

OJo1

OJ OJo ovo vorH rHO OVD VO

& &> >

•cj. * r ».ro o •** oC •*• C ojO (U O O-H rH X! -H rH J2•P Qi-P -P Qt-P<o g & IB § a4-> fa o -P Si mto to o to to Q

r ojrH <Min inrH rH

Cft cnm coOJ OJ

Cft OS

o o1 1f l R 3 Q O I 3 l

rH rH O

O in Cft -1*. fO rH««• v •«* in m Tin ul tn u> <o »DrH rH rH rH rH rH

Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft <TtCO CO CO CO CO CO

OJ OJ OJ OJ CO MfH rH rH rH rH rH

cr> en Cft ch CT> Cft

t-HI

*.^ —ftR300132

J3C gwdJ gwo) gwtu2 G JG 2 C A «3 C .Guto ranto 3nto auto muto

O O- - - O O . O Om m in -^ oj ino o vo m co r~rH rH rH rH rH rH

Cft cr\ en - en Cft encp co - co co ... co co<D vo vo- —vo. vb ^DOJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 01

eft en en - en en en

fiR300i33

^3 %

K* "

S

m o o oOS O ro Tr^ vo m r-rH rH rH rH

en cn eft enCO CO ^ CO

\o vo vo vo

en eft en en

to to flR3QOI3U

APPENDIX B

WELL DATA SHEETS

AR300I35

WELL DATA SHEET

HENDERSON ROAD SCHOOL WELL #5 ,.

Total Depth 325.'00'Water Level 61.29'

eet of Standing water 263.71'

asing Diameter 6"

h - 263.71'" /r2 x h x 7.5 « 1 volume in gallons

3.14 x .0625 x 263.71 x 7.5 = 388 gallons

Total amount purged - 1164 gallons

olurae Data

Volume t 1 Volume & 2 Volume ft 2.5 Volume I 3

h 7.54 7.55 7.45 7.43

Specificonductivityn OHMs 165 225 200 200

memperatureC 18 18 19 18.5

flR300!36

WELL DATA SHEETDAVEY TREE - WELL #11

otal Depth 234.00' - -«ater Level - . . - - _ : . : - .... _ " . . . . 75 ..73'

eet of Standing Water 157.27 feet

•"asing Diameter = 6 inches

h - 157.27' . ._....... .._;..... ....... _ :;.. .7/r x h x 7.5 = 1 volume in gallons

3.14 x .0625 x 157.27 x 7.5 = 232 gallons

Total amount purged-= 696 gallons

olume Data

.Volume # 1 Volume # 2 Volume # 3

ph 6.5 6.8 6.7

pec if ic* . . . . . - - ... . .conductivityin OHMS N/A ......_H..N/A ....._.. . _ . _ . „ . _ . _ . N/A

^emperature . - . = ... -"- :-- , •-- - . , - .-=- ..- .."C 13.7 13.8 13.8

* Conductivity meter was not functioning while purging this well

.o

HR300I37

WELL DATA SHEETO'HARA SCHOOL SITE LANDFILL - WELL I 70

otal Depth 260.00'Level 54.75'

eet of Standing Water 205.25'

rasing Diameter « 6"

h - 205.25'

•£r2 x h x 7.5 x 205.25' x 7.5 - 302 gallons

3.14 x .0625 x 205.25' x 77.5 = 302 gallons

Total amount purged - 906 gallons

olume Data

Volume t 1 Volume I 2 Volume I

•h 6.69 6.65 6.70

Specificonductivityn OHMs 1800 1900 1875

temperatureC 18.3 18.4 . 18.1

AR300.I38

APPENDIX C

WELL CHARACTERISTICS

AR3QQI39

rtj•Htowg04

B

01P O

0) O J3 W -P & O> r H U 4 - 1 G H W 4 - )

in o o i n m o i n o o o i n o tnvo ^r o t-~ r^- co o H ' f O ' ^ ' v o r - o j inrH OJ O J ^ H r H V O r H O J r H :rH rH rH

4J 4J -Ptw <w y-4m in T T ^ ^ C D o c n i n i n o ^ o tno j 0 3 n q q c s o o j ^ o o c v o v oO J r o o j 3 3 o j o j o j o i r ^ o j 3 o j

r H o j m ^ co n ^f o? ro • 3* o enI T ) r H r H r H r H r H O J O i m r o m i ^

Go•H4J

m

APPENDIX D

PHOTO LOG

UPPER MERION RESERVOIR SAMPLING

flRSOOUl

PHOTO 1 - Looking south towards southern end of the. quarts .Sample Station1 is in the center of the picture approximately 40' north fromthe southern shore. -

PHOTO 2 - Looking south east at eastern wall of quarry. Picture is takenfrom Station 2.

AR300U3

PHOTO 3 - Looking east, at Sample Station 3 from .the center of reservoir.Station 3 is below cement foundation (in upper left of picture)approximately"60r out from the eastern wall. . . .

PHOTO 4 - Looking north west at old building on the north wall of thequarry. Picture is taken from Sample Station 4, approximately30' out from the north wall.

PHOTO 5 - Looking west from the center of the reservoir. Sample Station 5is approximately 100' out from the shore-in the center of thepicture. __-__ - : _ --__.-.

4R3HOU6

6 - vestStation S at *. .este.

CO

PHOTO 16 - Looking at waterfall on east side of the quarry. This is returnflow from" the filters, note green staining on the rocks.

AH300150

APPENDIX E

PHOTO LOG

STANLEY KESSLER WELL SAMPLING

SR300I5I

PHOTO 1 - Looking south at MW-2 .on the Kessler site; Sharon Schaeffer ofCDM FPC collecting split sample from GTI personnel.

v t

PHOTO 2 - Looking north at MW4, and GTI personnel preparing to purge thewell.

AR30.0I53

PHOTO 3 - Sharon Schaeffer of CDM FPC collecting split sample at MW4.

3R300I5U

PHOTO 4 - Looking south at rear of the Kessler site storage yard and WW3,

aR300i 55

- -v

PHOTO 5 - Andrew Hopton of CDM FPC collecting split sample from GTIpersonnel at MW3. - " " " "" "

aR3fiOI56

PHOTO 6 - Andrew Hopton collecting split sample at MW-5A.

4R100I57

PHOTO 7 - Looking east at air stripper next to the. front of the StanleyKessler building.

AR3fiO'l58

PHOTO 8 - Andrew Hopton collecting sample from the tap on air stripperinfluent line.

AR300I59

APPENDIX F

STEVENS RECORDER CHARTS

flR30QI60

LEGEND FOR STEVEMS RECORDER CHARTS

Start Test Point

Depth to water (DTW) at start test and water level elevationat start test (both in feet)

End Test Point

Depth to water (DTW) at end test and water elevation at endtest (both in feet)

?/**

mP.-L ---L

£ £*:

-G

*,

^

1^

J'$*-

:i

ill

-4-_i.

u

RTRW

• fHti

2Vi- '1 j -'

_*-.

_rr

it

-3^r ?r

K

I

i <

iTJ300166

^ /•/*•%«

ZT~

;# .f {«j

j,i-i>*£_...._

E

4i

*a

•f-H-n 1

r 1

i l l

i

_-

f

;:£s.u

:r

rwm,

;3.oo"l73

*/ .u

• " •.."""""

/v/25 /yZfr /&/Z-/ . '"/ft 'U/t-l /v/ -MS /"/•*!

- • • l ^ .-''I.V LVJ" -,""- .*: --- i ...I.J-? ••; "._:,-• - i*: --"" f " ,- "" o-i" ' -ETT1 '---<—T~Vj _= ,*i .--. t,"-"^ ~"'-|~T -1 • •'=' fit*- < - - - ',~- --— - -" ^-r—-^-- * " > '". -" ,' . •' " . '- ' ^ 1

- -, P " '~"-riil. " - __ J ' --" --*- "-i T" - " -' '*! '"' _- * _ .P r *. . -- .F.-- ' -*— •- '--• --•--. -._ - -,__?_- . . . - . - - - . _ -; | ( k - ' • - . . ' . • rr _ '. -, - ^H

.... . .... ._._,,____„-.._._. ._-.:.V:F=.__ _._ ,.,-.-._ .. ..„- . ^.__.,v .. -- . . ^ --.^ _ _ - . - . , - • ' g

tt'

4 '44- _: tr. ~I7$&

&.

Ll

LZl

f-'

7-3-

3

^ _C -I- ( J V

Itc«

Tn/&

17

///? ///v ///r ///<, >//7

300 L79-;

v ////j ////y '///5" "A v/'7 '/'' ;///? ' ^if/a

. flR300183"fit

///Zl

, •"-"---" " .- ——flB3.00l,85-.

R3QOT86

life /z nfe /ifr

... ...flR3.OOl.87. .. , -- ' - . " -

. ^ '.l-yMv-: '< > - .•-:'-•--* •—

H--

A-v.V

B

±

Z J _ L _ ~ - l _ £ - _ _ _ _ >.J-

WATER LEVEL DATA- HERMIT DATA LOGGER -COLUMBIA BOILER WELL

DTW (ft) TIME .

89.97 1225 10/13/8990.00 202589.98 0425 . . . , - 10/14/8989.97 122590.02 202590.00 0425 10/15/8990.00 122590.04 202590.04 0425 10/16/8990.01 122590.04 202590.02 0425 10/17/8989.95 122589.99 202590.12 -- 0425 10/19/8990.14 122590.20 202590.19 0425 10/20/8990.15 1225

——————————————————————————————————————————————, ,. EPJD TEST

———————————————————————————————————————————,——RESTART TEST91.04 160091.07 240091.05 0800 11/18/8991.07 160091.12 240091.12 0800 11/19/8990.99 160090.87 240090.80 0800 11/20/8990.65 - 160090.98 2400

AR300I95

90.91 . . •;.;;•..:.-;:;.._:DBOO ._ ' . ..•_; ", 11/21/8990.99 • --. - 1600. .-,.-__..- ..._. .. . . .91.06 . -,,...--2400..._...._.__._.__...:___.;: ......91.07 0800 ' 11/22/8991.01 V... . 160090.96 240090.99 0800 "•...:.:. 11/23/8991.03 - 1600 .91.07 240091.12 _OSOO _ _ _ _ _ - 11/24/899l.il .. 1600 .;:..•-.......:_:.::::..:.91.1.0 .240091,06 - .'. ".. 080'0 ... . . . . _ . _ . _ . . . 11/25/8991.00 - 1600 . ..1.91.05 ' . - 2400 '-...."--:- --..::. ...91,01 ~ ::: " OSM"'---—---_.•;•.;-;•-" .: 1-11/26/8991.10 ... . 1600 :_ . . .91.20 ." "240091.22 . _ . . 080a. . . 11/27/8991.16 . 1600 -91.11 - T" 240091.05 0800 11/28/8991.15 - ..._ -160091,26 . - - . : ~ r . - - - 2400 . " . . . .91.28. . 0800 11/29/8991.30 1600 . - - . - - - _ - -91.27 240091.22 . . _ .0800 11/30/8991.23 160091.31 v - :- 240091.37 0800 " - 12/1/8991.38 - 1600 .9.1.39 ... . - '..._ 240091.31. ...--• .•_.;_:_._ 0800. —: 12/2/8991.14. - 160091.20 " 2400

SR300i96

91.20 0800 - 12/3/8991.27 160091.33 240091.39 0800 12/4/8,991.33 160091.32 240091.38 0800 12/5/85——————————————————————————————————————————————• END TEST

3R300i97

APPENDIX G-l

CRL ANALYTICAL RESULTSVOLATILE ORGANIC RESULTS FOR

ALL WELLS AND UPPER MERION RESERVOIRAND TAL MEHM-S FOR SELECTED WELLS

UR'3.00198

90, 01.-'"10 13:-55 FQ2-.i.EPfl CRL f l N N R P O L I S

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORY&39 BESTQAfE ROAD

ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21401(30.J 266-9180

DATE :January 10, 1990

SUBJECT:Correction* to Stanley Kessler VOC Report

FROM ;Daniel K. DonnellyChief, Laboratory Branch

TO .C-srallyn Vails (3KW12)

As a result of our recent discussions on the November 2, 1989 VOC report forthe Stanley Kessler case we found that two dates shown in the report are notaccurate. The narrative states that, "the samples were analyzed from 9/11/89to 9/30/89..,". It should read "...the samples were analyzed from 9/11/89 to10/5/89...*. On page 3 of the report the last date in the table of "Sarapland Analysis Dates" is incorrect. Samples 890928-05 through 890928-14 weractually analyzed on 10/5/89.

DK0;nt

cc: Andy HoptonPeggy Zawodny 1 J

3R3QQi99

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.... -REGION ill

CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORY839 BESTGATE RQAD

ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21*01(301) 2664 1801

DATE : November 3, 1989 . ...

SUBJECT: Analytical Reports for Stanley Kessler

FROM : Daniel K. Donnelly (3ES21)Acting Chief, Laboratory Branch

TO : Gerallyn Vails (3HW12)

Enclosed are .the analytical reports for the Stanley Kessler site. If youhave any questions regarding these reports, please give me a call.

DKD:jr

Enclosures ---a/s

cc: Andy HoptonCDM

SR300200

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION in

CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORY839 BESTGATE ROAD

ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21401(301) 266-9180

DATE : November 3, 1989

SUBJECT: voc Analysis of Stanley Kessler, Superfund-Enforcement, (9/11/89 -10/16/89), 890908-08 - 17; 890913-01 - 12; 890914-04 - 19; 890919-01 - 02;890921-01 - 04; 890928-05 - 14

FROM : James JerpeChemist

TO : Daniel K. DonnellyActing Chief, Laboratory Branch

Water samples were analyzed by purge and trap of a 5 aL solution using "aTracor Model 585 gas chroaatograph with Hall 1000 HECD and 703 PIDdetectors in series. Equipment was calibrated with AccuStandard 502commercial standards and chloro-bromopropane and fluorobenzene externalstandards. (Hethod 502.2)

Sampling commenced 9/7/89 and the samples were analyzed from 9/11/89 to9/30/89 in sequence. Exact dates of sampling and analysis are included ina separate table. Samples with significantly high or low values were re-run in duplicate the following day. Instrument blanks were run asnecessary and reported in the tabulation.

Quality assurance samples were chosen to reflect the analytes present inappropriate sanples. These quantitative results were performed at thedates recorded.

Samples 890928-05 and 09 were chosen to confirm qualitative results byinjecting 1000 alcrollters of headspace Into a GC/Ion-trap massspectrometer system.

JJ:ad

cc: Sue WarnerPeggy Zawodny

AR30020I

Page 2 of 11

VOC Analysis of Stanley Kessler, Superfund-Enforcement,890908-08 - 17; 890913-01. - 12; 890914-04 - 19; 890919-01 - 02;890921-01 - 04; 890928-05 - 14

Sample Description: '

Lab Ho... .._._______ Description

890908-08 Stanley Kessler, Deacon Industrial Supply, Sta. #SK01-09 Stanley Kessler, BFI, Sta. #SK02-10 Stanley Kessler, Bearoff Auto, Sta. #SK03-11 Stanley Kessler, Matsunk WT Plant, Sta. #SK04-12 Stanley Kessler, Pasquale Real Estate, Sta. #SK05-13 Stanley Kessler. Airco, Sta. #SK06-14 Stanley Kessler, Rossi, 706 Crooked Lane, Sta. #SK07-15 Stanley Kessler, Korba, 708 Crooked Lane, Sta. #SK08-16 Stanley Kessler, Falcone, 700 Crooked Lane, Sta. #SK09-17 Stanley Kessler. Trip Blank 1, Sta. SKTB1

890913-01 Stanley Kessler, UMR Station 1, Depth 109', Sta. UM1-01-02 Stanley Kessler, Station 1, Depth 82', Sta. UM1-02-03 Stanley Kessler, Station 1, Depth 60', Sta. UMl-03-04 Stanley Kessler, Station 1, Depth 40', Sta. UMl-04-05 Stanley Kessler, Station 1, Depth 20't Sta. UMl-05-06 Stanley Kessler, Station 1, Depth 5'. Sta. UM1-06 --07 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 90', Sta. UM2-01-08 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 80', Sta. UM2-02-09 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 60', Sta. UM2-03-10 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 40', Sta. UM2-04-11 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 20f, Sta. UM2-05-12 Stanley Kessler, Station 2, Depth 5', Sta. UM2-06

890914-04 Stanley Kessler, UMR Station 3, Depth 76', Sta. UM3-01•05 Stanley Kessler, Station 3, Depth 60', Sta. UM3-02-06 Stanley Kessler, Station 3, Depth 40', Sta. UM3-03-07 Stanley Kessler, Station 3, Depth 20', Sta. UM3-04-08 Stanley Kessler, Station 3, Depth 5r, Sta. DH3-05-09 Stanley Kessler, Station 3, Depth 5', Sta. BM3-06-10 Stanley Kessler, Station 4, Depth 76', Sta. UM4-01-11 Stanley Kessler, Station 4, Depth 60', Sta. UM4-02-12 Stanley Kessler, Station 4, Depth 40', Sta. UM4-03-13 Stanley Kessler, Station 4, 'Depth 20'f Sta. XJM4-04-14 Stanley Kessler, Station 5, Depth 76', Sta, UM5-01-15 Stanley Kessler, Station 5, Depth 60', Sta, 13M5-02-16 Stanley Kessler, Station 5, Depth 40't Sta, UH5-03-17 Stanley Kessler, Station 5, Depth 20', Sta, UM5-04-18 Stanley Kessler, Equipment Blank, Sta. SK-EB-1-.19 - Stanley Kessler, Trip Blank, Sta. SK-TB-2

890919--01 Stanley Kessler, MW5 at Henderson Rd. School, Sta. SK-MW5-02 Stanley Kessler, Equipment Blank, Sta. SK-EB-2

890921-01 .Stanley Kessler, Well 11, Davey Tree, Sta. SK-MW11-02 Stanley Kessler, Well 70, O'Hara Landfill, Sta. SK-MW70-03 Stanley Kessler, Well 70, O'Hara Landfill, This Is a duplicate

of SKMW70, Sta. SK-MW70A-04 Stanley Kessler, Trip Blank #3. Sta. SKTB3

flR300202

Page 3 of 11

VOC Analysis of Stanley Kessler, Superfund-Enforcement, -890908-08 - 17; 890913-01 - 12; 890914-04 - 19; 890919-01 - 02;890921-01 - 04; 890928-05 - 14

Saaole Description: (Con't)

Lab Ho. Description

890928-05 Stanley Kessler, Stanley Kessler Well #2, Sta. SKMW2-06 Stanley Kessler, Duplicate of Well #2, Sta. SKMW1•07 Stanley Kessler, Stanley Kessler Well #3, Sta. SKMU3-08 Stanley Kessler, .Stanley Kessler Well .£4. Extra sample for

HS/DS, Sta. SKMW4-09 Stanley Kessler, Stanley Kessler Well #5A, Sta. SKKW5A-10 Stanley Kessler, Equipment Blank, Sta. SKHW6-11 Stanley Kessler, Trip Blank #4, Sta. SKTB4-12 Stanley Kessler, Stanley Kessler Recovery Well Influent,

4 Sta. SKRW1-13 Stanley Kessler, Purge Water Sample MW4, Sta. SKPW4-14 Stanley Kessler, Purge Water Sample MW5A, Sta. SKPW5A

and Analysis Dates:

Lab No. Sampling Pate Analysis Date

890908 -OS - 17 9/7/89 9/11/89890913-01 - 12 9/12/89 9/16/89890914-04 - 19 9/12/89 9/18/89890919-01 - 02 9/18/89 9/21/89890921-01 9/19/89 9/22/89

-02 - 04 9/20/89 9/22/89S90928-05 - 14 9/26/89 10/11/89

HR3QQ203

>>1oco3HCofn0«H«J

Pfl

U

H

H

CoI ty>u>KF

ocfn<<CO-H•PO0)

oft*

H«PC

o>

«.-i

s.« A< CS) O0 C.^—03 3-»ft. 3 -CO

«-.t-l1

-- S2 -H- O3 , C\OT -5 og"S"0»E S »f-t *-*•

*0 O-JJ H_d i

. O co-,-! or-l O.fto.3 C\Q CO

*OH1

Eu m 26, n O9 _j *§ Ij °^* S^ sa 3

Ca o\J5 0C 1O 30 COh 1-1 OO _ C\^ ,_» 3 oc g g ovK to S CO1c -; coS g ov 5 l-fc coa z <t o5 § cS gggth* ^iH *« S« JS« dX ^>c

- - ...._ _. ....__ . . . . . . .

h_J O. H INC, . . . i i i i i i i f i]-n VD H 0 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1

o r*•P H10 1

j « 2S<. i i i i i i i i i • i i _j Stn l t l i i i i i l ^ "l l ^gM Q coo

IQ 4* 4Q) 0 .y r*1«S4J It

j ......_._ w Q) __^r_. _--. -v\o in eo in J 2-^ l l ( 3 Q c > . o ' O f « * * * rt S(jl j||iP'--'(>jv_x'*_>-{-i_0^'CO ^ ^

3 WH H " ^ S <*^—p« t-t co.

.Hf

ti 1 1 1 0 ^^^^^i I"! s^§tj. i i i « r-> co in w o i co o § jgSmfa 3«fl

inH1

T _*fc _«* /*% fO COti i . * t i i i i • i i i ^ -^sC P I H C O I | l l l « l l l §»jg

1-1 SCO

rH1

i-3 *- i-j co f«^ t- CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 • II M 2CP ••!! 1 1 1 1 * 0 . 1 1 co S300 ! w _3^

f ^5 f*l Ol

r>H1

*_ — f\j O

ii i i i i i i i i ., - i i o^St y t l l i i i l i i r * I I o ^ Ss ^ "^S^) < §CO

<DGJ Q) N

^ 1 1 1 1 1& 1 1 1 1 1

^. 1 1 1 t 1& 1 I 1 1 1jj

ti , , . . .t? 1 1 1 1 1

£ • • • • • • ^g1 « i i « • 5~^ ^— ' •

1 109 **4

CJ r-laj ®^. 1 1 1 1 I C >tP t 1 1 1 1 OMa -Q -P •J4 (0 C

(0 -P Oo .d _u^l C 3&o

m3 <0 O

•HrH >t

4J (0O <D 9 C 4J H

O

S 0) 3 0) d . 4 > 0 > « ' d Q > O§*«-_< j .Q g'g'-.S ^SltiOQ.>i B - H O 0) >i C B .4) -dHH^J QJO. >i<i) ^1® s

O CJ J-i 0 « P OO 1) M Q) ^ C 0 C CrHOO C rHO -i-.ffl(0,d ^ i-H ffl >iJ3 j-! fl Ho o ,d c H « an o tH 1-1 «J•rSHUC >i C O >i C I XjCQ jC. (d O -Xlfflt-l-PO^-P-P o i o M i 5 -, _ _

?H **"i +* Ci t*i *ri 1 ||.. _ - __ - * J" p *-j. "J *°HHE-ift eWHEHE-<HS5

O OH O*H fl O•H C O

o -,

SR30020U

Oin

I t 1 I 1

o•PCJJ-lO.03IH

*-(C.

O-HtT»<Dttr-tCfc43c:0oH

H

Co-HO*COPi

>.ocotn^CO---..POo4JOMp.I-.o-pc0

coM-H>Cw•

CO

D

"

\DO1

*Z°£i cni-tOagcn53 CO

inott-.*08*-*1C*_^ogen°co

hi\&3

i^S

•coI*">

*^s • )

iSgenQCO•pc<D

_3

-Enforc

••ofi3<t-iTJ-t<B0•-«-•CO1

^a:f—au.OJX>Or-C<04JW

J

S

noinS3*-"• ovJ^osenEJ CC

>J

t«fo1r.

C^H?0

i-5 *^^^

r-cI<rr-<r-OCT

i§SeejBSE?

«*01(CS:.4-caTcI-a

*»

CJz<1r

31 14 .

3•

E)H-jj3 "3 O>.

b k ^ . U-.O t-jCO I> O3* 1 • • 1O 1 O O 1

hiCO . N I ft. t • » 1

•-t 1 r-i O 1

bH CM 10. t . . |H I H O 1

hica -y m• i • • iH 1 H O 1

foh.t 1 CO 11 t • • 1

O 0

t_.f-I OJ CO **

1 • • • •I H n o «-.

0)C

0 <D RJC C J40) 0) <D -P0i CH C.O 0 >iO^ Hi ^ift >i2 0O -c! ffl -Hfc -P 0 AO S ffl U OH fi O O-H£ O J-tH M0 <4 0£ B•H O H O 1Q .C «J HI O O h *•HH-H 1J H•-.q J-l flJ *•HO _ |4 H

CNHI=s1 C.§odCO

HH|

2"Yen3°2s o»co

•4£S

\CP^

oHI

ssaS_CCT.toco

^.«

oo1enS'-*Is£ChSCO

COoICO

£H°cne-jOgcr.[3 CC

JfcS

^S

r-olnMHoc,CS°gCTt_i CC

^S

• •

C^Cf-isy

.1iti

I-3r> oi in• • •H H 0

I 1 11 I 1

eo r-* • tH H 1

H *t• • 1

OJ 04 1

f. • - 1H H 1

hic. o• • 10 H .

0 <I>C Cfl) Q) 0)rt r^ __ 1ft C HO fl> S^H J_!ft >iPo.a o^ 4J OO O fcH O OA Mr-.00^!-r. i-i OQ ?*1 0 hH-H 4J- f-t OJH EH &

*V•H6-H.-.

<D

3!-P<d-P-,-t-PC(0&gI-.Q)-Q4JBO01oMftQ)£r-itoS1h>

flR3G0205

o*ijoj_53BO-H

ffl0,rHlrt?*

-PBO<-*

HHH

BO

0>P;- ^oB

S1*•BO-H4JOO-pobp._~l

menta

B .o-H

1toD

oH1<•

r-t Ho cn"* S

• £3 co

J H m^ J JOP H r-i3

enoI

>i *O Hi cnQ o

CO

_j t**x. i 3

COo11/1**Q Hi cnQ OJE 0s

PCO

J in" N. 1 "tP 1 O*f-4~

o

-p0)

c)_cc' £1•OcfcSI

1J•J

"oWcfc.

<"cre•PU]

• 4

0]E(C!z4-La*rCi

UM3-04

890914-

0Ien**rt rHYen_3 n>Me-

*

h>inl •l o

l l

i l1 l

hiJ n co\ 1 • • 1tn l CN o' l

„ h>1-3 COx • itp o i0

•

ino

°c3_OPet

h»\ CO^- • IS1 o ij3

tjC

s3iOPQ

J CO\ • 1& O 1-j

,

*

1Cr-£1«b 1

, 1-Dichloropropene

Chloroform

j-jh- "• |0 I

hi- io

h>CO• I0 1

Trichloroethylene

Tetrachloroethylene

fN.

H1

_*O

_3°_«.cnPCO

, ^^J in inX. • • 1tT» 0 O 1^

l£>H1

CO**

?cn§cnCO

h>J CO Is- CO

tn H H o3 N

_tf.-d-inH1

-M**O1 l/\Ogen£5 co

Soh> '(-P cn en co { 2***-» * * • 'HCn H H o s5_!

_( • Q"tJM en

CO

X 1 1Cn I l£j

o ~ * - . ..j,H

UM5-01

890914-

rH1^

'S.I §•ClBCD,

fA J__i2 yO

„ SJ25 |Sj&> O 0 0 Q 8S5 E BO• S uo\n wco

ht SM O O \O **Nt • • • ™tJ^ H H O C33

^^ < 'tP 1 t3

i_X 1 Itj> 1 13

CM

OJH1

ocni o*-0"BCO

^cnM H

i h» •-' Lw H O •* tf _*^^ ' • • «_P —i -; ~» &ff»__ ^* ** ^ *w _.__— ' i n

jb cnCC

X 1 1t7^ I 1^

XHH1•<*

CMHOOl' OgCP

CO

P ecj '

^* * JlV-l H 0 05 _*\ • • • ' *~tp oj oj o .5* 213 39rji CM

td oj

)- -<* H

tr» H H

•

c2at-CP(tt/ 1

f 1-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Samnle No. :

Methylene Chloride

Chloroform

cn._-**go

-HOwenHco

cnoI

_ (-»Cj^3 dSS MO*O Sec

h>N^ •&< O

\ 1t_n l^

"oiOH

1 dSw Seno Sco

\ 1&* 1

M "

W

|i^ 3C CC

X Itj* 1

O

*<4

C»«r-cfctc

,-

i ii i

CO1 •1 H

CO1 •1 H

hi"* CO• •o en

1,1, -Dichloropropen

Trichloroethylene

Chlorobenzene

•4J-H

•Hi-J

0)•H-PKJ-P-rH4-Bflj&gi~Hd>-Q

J -

Analyte present

flR'300206

HH

Or*-,2.KJP<

*>_\4O4J•3ft

J53r-t

BOtr>S

rHt.4JBCOU

H

H

CO*2L0)WV

fj*B0)9*co•«•?o4JO&rH«

Ci1ota-H

CW*toD

CO

H ttd ^*S enow co

hio, vo >• • • lif r"J

OJ r**•PO

O CO•H OJH cnfto2 cnQ co

•-( ^^ I 1 • »D\ i l n l

•x.?n o»-3 COd ojok_ cnw co

•j ^ o 5**» • i * *O^ cn t <• o

.Q? »O-po«J 1O cot-t O3H cnQt o

4JCtyCOoJ-JoT™cwic4-*£y..ai—wa^>r-Cft-pC/l

3 cnQ co

ti ^ i °.ti» H l cn H5 en 04

VON O

IT OS OJo

__ °*

j tn in o*-». - l • •B* oj l cn oj^ h f

3) in4JO

0 co-H NH CPiao3 cnQeo

J rt O-*. • t * CfttP -<r ! oa •^ Ot CO rH

toN O, Id ®s a Oio&_ crCO cc

i-l oj r« H•*-, • t » •Oi O t O O40 eh n

&* B 0BO Ca>ifiHO -c! <D S

« a<o >i-pOi O O .C C"EKS:*-CdTcj.ft

» ij Sj -p or*<r-C£*«

O O <B HH O O

o o o x:• 1 *r"l r*l 3

1 I U V)H 08 -H -P» "M Qi H H EHEH

iO•M

C-t

P*CS

! S&4

*wFC6Wi?

I M

' --

^

>-fC_ig

, 81 «

93

|1

11

|»

OBftojOoHf*O•HQ1».H

PCO

p C*JrHtn cnBH

^-~. 1 1 1 1^ 1 l 1 1

~<

1< CO

h| °w o^? CO

J m ^r^. • i i •O\ vo 1 1 vot -f -j»

enH

CO<r ojd oc_! en_* CC

r~i__! in VD *ti . . j .3 ^ H

— j_N|1

SH ?1M *

b£ CO

cnt—1 * O---. l rn l votP 1 1 H3

_^ Hfl Has lS ®W pg(-.en*W J

H§

h>t-1 CM*-. • 1 1 I& O i l !c

o*£> r-i

1H CC

•|Sw S

i_3"^ CO 1 1 COg * * i i *& m 01

<: enin O

1

w O*S o1^s« CO

h>j r*. v_> en^. r- l * oO* H 1 O HS

oE O0) B Oft (0 BO ,d Q)fc £ rHft 0) >-O O -C.. ^ 4J

1

OfcClr-cgctf

O O E Q>(H rH fi Otf< /3 O t-fO O <w O*H -r-t O HQ Q ^v jd1 I O OH OJ H-H* £ H H O EH

1 I1 I

b-fc

CO• 1

o !

1 11 1

l 11 I

I l1 1

1 11 I

in co» •m in

OB(0ftO^ftOMorHr*O 0)-H BO 0)1 HCO fi^ wH £Q

11

11

11

H

eg

11

I

11

0)BR]

0)OoHr]O•H^EH1H»H

_H

H•OJ

1

11

11

t1

I1

11

(JJ

§j3HOEH

4J"e•HH

o>•H*>(0*»-H

Bid&OH0)A

1mQ)j_jftCOJj1HKj

SI

fiR300207

Page 8 of 11

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, CRL

Project Name: Stanley Kessler - Superfund-Enforcement.

QA Samples: - _ ..- :_.- WP1188/2 True _. WP1188/2(9/14/89) (9/20/89)i • -

Benzene 84.0 96.1 63.8Toluene 58.8 63.5 59.4Ethylbenzene ... 55.7 61.2 46.0

WP1278/4 True 95% Confidence Unit(9/14/89) .

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.8 2,5 0.9-4.5Chloroform 10.0 18.2 9.8-25.4Trichloroethylene 1.1 1.3 0-3.2Tetrachloroethylene 2.3 2.2 1.3-3.7Bromodichloromethane 0.9 1.2 0-4.1Dibromochloromethane 2.1 3.0 0.3-6.3Bromoform ------•—3.0 4.2 2.3-7.1

flR300208

Page 9 of 11

Notes:

'Target compound concentrations were calculated using relativeresponse factors based on commercially prepared standards from 2different sources at concentrations of the magnitude anticipatedin unknowns. (Nominal 20 micrograms per L). The standardprocedures follow method 502.2, purge and trap with direct ;desorption of volatlles onto a wide bore (VOCOL) 120m capillarycolumn.

Calibration standards (Supelco, AccuStandard, 5_n-house neatsolutions traceable to EPA repository) are used daily andcompared with a calibration file up-dated as required (20 ppb to80 ppb levels for quantitation).

A method blank is routinely analyzed prior to calibration.Processing of samples is not continued if the blank is positivefor analyte peaks. Values found in field blanks submitted arethus reported as received and may imply significantcontamination.

Samples are normally run in sequence and duplicated atappropriate dilutions as required. Results are reportedregardless of variances. Between cycles, the trapping media isheated and flushed with carrier gas to avoid carry-over ofanalytes as prescribed by the published methodology.

Relatively high concentrations of analytes are confirmed by GC/MSanalysis of a submitted duplicate or by the ratio of multipledetector responses. Detection limits are data published in theFederal Register for Method 502-2 and proven appropriate by thesetechniques.

Recoveries of audits are calculated from either the theoreticaltrue concentration of a commercial standard and/or in-house auditconcentrations prepared per instructions. Results are tabulatedin the final report.

QR3QTJ209

Page 10 of 11

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, Central Regional Lab

QUAKT1TATION LIHITS

YOLATILES - STANDARD EQUAUBLE ; •

WaterCAS I .

. 75-71-8 D1chlorod1fluoromethane 174-87-3 Chloromethane 175-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 174-83-9 Broffiomethane 1

75-00-3, Chloroethane 175-69-4 Trlchlorofluoromethane 175-35-4 l,l-D1chloroethylene 175-09-2 Methylene Chloride 1

156-60-5 Trans-l,2-D1ch1oroethylene 175-34-3 ' 1,1-Dichloroethane * 1156-59-2 C1s-l,2-D1chloroethylene 165-66-3 CM orof ornt 1

71-55-6 1,1,1-Trlchloroethane 156-23-5 Carbon Tetrachlorlde 171-43-2 Benzene i107-0602 l,2-D1chloroethane 1

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene • 178-87-5 1,2-01chl oropropane 175-27-4 Bromodlchloromethane 1100-75-8 2-Chloroethylv1nylether 1

10061-2-6 Trans-l,3-Dich1oropropene 1108-88-3 Toluene 110061-1-5 Cls-1,3-D1chloropropene • 179-00-5 1,1,2-Trlchloroethane 1

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene . 1142-28-9 1.3-D1chl oropropane 1124-48-1 Dlbromochloromethane 1108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 1

630-20-6 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 175-47-6 0-xylene 1100-42-4 Styrene 1

75-25-2 Bromoform . 198-82-8 Isopropyl benzene 1108-86-1 Bromobenzene 179-34-5 1.1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1

R3002I.O

QUAK7ITATIOH LIMITS (Continued)

VOLATIIES-STANDARD EQUATABLE

CAS *

96-18-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1103-65-1 N-Propylbenzene 195-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 1106-43-4 4-Chlorotoluene 1

*

108-67-8 1,3,5-Trlmethylbenzene 198-06-6 Tert-Butylbenzene 193-63-6 1,2,4-Trlmethylbenzene 1135-98-8 Sec-Butylbenzene 1

541-73-1 1,3-Oichlorobenzene 1106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 199-87-6 ?-Isopropyltoluene 195-50-1 1,2-DUhlorotfenzene 1

104-51-8 K-Butylbenzene 196-12-8 1,2-D1bromo-3-Chloropropane 1120-82-1 1 (2,4-TrlChlorobenzene 191-20-3 Naphthalene 1

87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadlene 187-61-6 1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene 1594-20-7 2,2-D1chloropropane 1563-58-6 1,1-Dichloro-l-propene 1

74-95-3 Dibromcxnethane 1106-93-4 1,2-Dibromomethane 1* {H,P)-Xylene Isomers 1

5R3002II

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL. PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORYW§ BESTGATE ROAD

ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21401(301} 266-9 180

DATE : October 25, 1989

SUBJECT' Kercury Analyses of Stanley Kessler Samples, 890908-11-12,'890919.-01-Q2,, 890921-01-03, Superfund-En£. . TGB03N607 (10/4/89 - 10/19/89)

FROM -Ronald H.'"Chemist

JO :Daniel K. DpnnellyActing Chief, Laboratory Branch

THRU : Patricia F. SosinskiTeam" Leader, Metals^Section

The results of the mercury analyses of the Stanley Kessler samples are byautomated cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscropy are presented below.

Additional quality control results are available upon request.

Sample Descriptions and Results:

Lab No. . " Description . .. Hg(ug/L>

890908.-11 —..Stanley Kessler, Matsunk WT Plant, < 0.2Sta. # SK04

-12 Stanley Kessler, Pasquale Real Estate, • < 0.2Sta, # SK05 . -

890919-01.... .Stanley Kessler, MW5 at Henderson Rd. School, < 0.2Sta. SK-MW5

-02 Stanley Kessler, Equipment Blank, < 0.2Sta. SK-EB-2

890921-01. -.- ..Stanley Kessler, Well ll.Davey Tree, 3.5Sta. SK-MW11

-02 Stanley Kessler, Well 70,0'hara Landfill, 0.4Sta. SK-MW70

-03 Stanley Kessler, Well 70. O'hara Landfill, 0.4 ± 0This is a duplicate of SKMW70, (92%)Sta. SK-MW70A

Number in parenthesis is po.st-.digestion (analytical) spike recovery.

RHA:jr .- -. .- - - .. ;:..:.. : .. = ' — " . - :

cc: Peggy Zawodny\lQCQL ... ._. . .. ..

8R3002I2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORY839 BESTGATE ROAD

ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401(301) 266-9180

DATE : November 1, 1989

SUBJECT. petals Determinations of Stanley Kessler, Superfund-Enforcement,C9/25/89 - 10/25/89), 890908-11 & 12; 890919-01 & 02; 890921-01 - 03<_M K.I.V f#

FROM : c, Sze H. H. Willis K. C. Thaung P. F. Sosinski C. A. VeisbergStudent Intern Phys. Sci. Tech Chemist Chemist Chemist

TO : Daniel K. DonnellyActing Chief, Laboratory Branch

These samples were prepared for analysis by a contractor, WESTON,Environmental Services Assistance Team.

Samples 890908-11 & 12, 890919-01 & 02, and 890921-01 - 03, were analyzedby furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry. The results are presented in the attachedtable.

Additional quality control data are available upon request.

Sample Description: . . _. ...__.. . ._.._.._._._

Lab No. Description

890908-11 Stanley Kessler, Matsunk WT Plant, Sta. #SK04-12 Stanley Kessler, Pasquale Real Estate, Sta. #SK05

890919-01 Stanley Ke.sler, MW5 at Henderson Rd. School, Sta. SK-MW5-02 Stanley Kessler, Equipment Blank, Sta. SK-EB-2

890921-01 Stanley Kessler, Well 11, Davey Tree, Sta. SK-MW11-02 Stanley Kessler, Well 70, O'Hara Landfill, Sta. SK-MW70-03 Stanley Kessler, Well 70, O'Hara Landfill, This is a

Duplicate of SKHW70, Sta. SK-MW70A

CS/MHW/KCT/PFS/CAW: ad

cc: Peggy ZawodnyfnQCO *

o_• o *>

osi

r-j <S Sg • S5 O

o ®Q} «51 p<§ *o.pop-

-pO

_

co JH* *co

* . - .. *>b < , o n

O r-l O WCJ H H K

V

to o *•o n e c o0 * C . 5 i _ _ o o c n i o E^ * o f - i C t - o o o t t ^ ^ ) 0 ! f t ' S

5 0 1 v ^ " v v v v v r ^ n v - * v v v*>

_4 ' ""(0 [_•X4 Cijj E_i _-it-i j -sT- --ico " W • <wc ?w8 g^HHH

o•HO<D

O Oo o o o o o t n o t o o oV

^? I

- .V V V V V V V V V V V V V

O ^-* H .0>. CO O H '—o o n -H o ^- o

V v o j n H N V V V

o 2*« 3Sr d QS - 8 S S

I S 1 u, m S S M ^ ^ 3

,H H - - J - - J . H H < %•&%,«« - i - — t - r < - - J - - - W « J O ) W* 0+1 W H * K* ^"^-yo - H t - S - H o ~ o w < » 4 J

R3002Uo

.S il 8-8 t S SI S 3 3

o*10)tn

,Q3wrH«JCO-HCn01PS«-HOSiJC0)o».HHHCO

-*-p*"ft

Ii?co>Cn

co**-4*n4JO0)4JO

S•-H

ronmenta;

r-"-1"

cw*

CO«

<w--/» n^ o4 iy oji cnJ? o-£ <Jl

O ro

OJ"" "~~ Otie. I\. _j(A «—lr ojd cn-3 O•_G cnO «°

-. »5 *•e5 S3 s.

mv

-i *"*•ii *^ S3 OT*-» »__.

inv

o, H3 °*., i/— H_r> OJd cn5 °/4 H- co

J *C. «1 s«-* *— 'mv

OJoIcnHcno

. cn

I tt

HI03

invextV 9 <-<WE ? Vr_t-i' 1*- -* —%-j x cn

£ 5-. jK°^ r cic:3V)

cp_3CD

I

^C•HBno,__;>Or-HCc4JCQ

«a co^L w

i—i*

J S_-* Q

^ i«~i3 *invOJ

< HT •

"j '^ «>st- cn4§«

i •»— *^ *to ®S £i.

inv

r-t-

, 1J^CCC C3 CT-|icJ^c-_i a

i *-*>_3 ^1 s*•* «--•inv

*•

»*

&&a*G4JOot-o-H

. V*

flj j_.M W*3 *Hp

355 1 gCO CQ -KrH j-- rHft A rH

I I I

noI

oin cov o-

otn ov cn

o *-iin coV oi

O 0in ojV V

oin rHV OJ

oin oiV in

r— •»<*COH r-i-H in e*«—» n en* -HOIO 1-* rHin vo «— •v r-

-rH•d3 oc crf -H> N

HOJcnocnCO

O)o1HOJcnOcnCO

JnCn

iJCn

HO1HoicnocnCO

J-~~ii

t.

OJo1cnHOlOONCO

J(5n

HO1cnrHcnocnCO

,4

t«

OJHi

890908-

^tnn

HH1COOcno01CO

4I-H

1H

voH01

VOHOJ

O•

iny

o•mv

o•

OJ•d-

COOJH

CO* 1 — I

rH <H>H-lnrH rH• HO <->f

B3-r*Or-t

3

OJnrH

OJnH

O

mv

o•inv

>f**<*>ocn*-—*von•

VO

CO•nC4

r»•OJ+1M1•

t**

ap•rHU)0&„

cn•rOJ

n•0001

o•

inV

o•inv

*»COoH'— *o•

inv

in•f-

r>•o-Hrt•r*

a3•Haa(0%00<

toirH

inOJH

rH•

in

o•inv

3?VO-HrH*"*O•inv

CO•oOJ

«•o-HVO•

votn

-H

"2oto

*nOJ•HlH

5OO •

. Q) If)P (H Ou_l (•O *rlg <5 MM>; arH-H >a oc a o0 Q)•rl M4>rHO C S)* uxP-rH-H•543 ft•0 >^iflH

TJ C r-,« C X-r! «"-!VJ^-*tHM ^>O C <-c o eO.-H <-•• -Pn c5 0) OO Cn-H

dditions

lues bel

post-di

e-digest

< « Q) M-r<>U °**,,! CJH.C a« P W fc•d o «> i«C,Q Wc oj tn-p *_q-P,co c -P atPCX

*W O O UO O fc (tf•H * h•OrH Oi Ao &.5 3 G C-P t3M-HOK 13 tt 056 S S

!--•$$. 3 BHcos 3 3K* S55B

3R3002I5

i• vt to* *•** v -*j «,

£ =5 J* co_,ECcn

O N-3

r

oz. -.

o

o ";2 o

za»-oOzo1-

dWCO

oz

fc

oi *i{ «i

cr

i(fl|

O05CC

-s

cte

tM

&•rrrc-J U^TI-r J-o

O

CO

*

0

£icr-TXP

i

1

CO

ev

c-

.»,

Ul

_-ro-

s

-o0..ifi

^I

fc

NO Eo

S

vj ..6

CC

5 ^

I 1

§ ,K

cc

!faoJD

11II

o

flR3002!9

inocr-'.I

i sic/> cn«

... . ,„. . _. . O•3 ~

(3 (0111 ?n- o«2 -=3m cc

3 S I *»i [ *ii l o

/y. I ••__ j"l "X. * »V *v •«€——I_!L3i——tr Ji Pj

Ql X^ »_. \ -• ?-. I C/J VA-I U)

OLUCC

oo. JC

o1LUl * - CJO

5!Oi

LVJ1,i i i^si. i-.4a

iu

°I i!3. .0

Ul—»Occb ' t-.

avuo

s r~i.f ^i s i« iirf l-a. i-^a IQ c .?« ^ ° 1^1 i irr i^

^

\

CO

S

5\

0r>os_5O7

v*.

rv

o Q

N-i(S»

roo

IV

(VO

u-°! *'-*

\i

ro?te

c-

flR3Q022i

a'R3QQ222

1 5" '.

Q

?J

DC

CC-2

SR300223.

APPENDIX G-2 - - - - -

CLP ANALYTICAL RESULTSTCL ORGANIC AND TAL INORGANIC

RESULTS FOR STANLEY KESSLER SITE WELLS

flR30022t*

2S68A RtVA ROAOSUITE 300ANNAPOLIS, MO 21401PHONE. 301 -266-9887

DATES 19 OCTOBER 1989

SUBJECT: ORGANIC DATA VALIDATION FOR CASE 12788/SAS 494ic-Task iSite: STANLEY KESSLER

—•/*! QP DOH 0' BRIEN P® IHT t T _»T.TfO J T31-> » VTTT /~ TMl m X n TTTTT 'C'TJ-C'TJ

FROH: DOUG McINNESORGANIC DATA REVIEWER . ORGANIC DATA REVIEWER

TO: TERRY SIMPSOMESAT DEPUTY PROJECT OFFICER

THRU: DAN DRESSERESAT TEAM MANAGER (acting)

OVBRVIBW

Case 12788/SAS 4941C Task 1 consisted of seven (7) low levelaqueous samples for semi-volatile and pesticide/PCB analyses, andincludes one (1) equipment blank. The samples were analyzed as aContract Laboratory Program (CLP) Special Analytical Service(SAS) .

All samples were successfully analyzed for all target compoundsAll instrument and method sensitivities were according to theContract Laboratory Program (CLP) Routine Analytical Service(RAS) protocol.

MINOR PROBLEK

The compound 2,4-dinitrophenol failed precision criteria forthe semivolatile initial calibration. Quantitation limits forthis compound were qualified "UJ" for the affected samples.(See Table I in Appendix F).

NOTES

o The semivolatile MS/MSD analyses had a compound other than thespiking compounds present. Following is a table of resultsand a precision estimate for this non-spiked compound:

ftR3Q0225

Page 2 of 2

MS/MSP Non-Spiked Compounds

___ Concentration fqcr/L)'Compound .._.. ______ ___ _gCH53 CCH53MS CCH53MSD

bis(2-ethylhexyl) 1 J ND 1 Jphthalate .

ND - Not Detected

o The maximum concentration of the common laboratory contaminantdi-n-octylphthalate found in the equipment blank or methodblank is 25 fig/L. All samples with concentrations of thiscommon laboratory contaminant less than ten times (<10X) theblank concentration have been qualified "B" in the datasummary. (See Appendix F) . " -

o The reported Tentatively Identified Compounds (Tie's) inAppendix D have been reviewed and corrected during datavalidation. Tie's identified as blank contaminants have beencrossed off the TIC Form I's.

All data for Case 12788/SAS 4941C Task 1 were reviewed inaccordance with the Functional Guidelines for Evaluating OrganicAnalyses with Modifications for use within Region III. The textof this report addresses only those problems affecting usability-

ATTACHMENTS . .... .1 . . . . . _ "

1) Appendix A - Glossary of Data Qualifiers2) Appendix B - Data Summary. These include:

(a) All positive results for target compoundswith qualifier codes where applicable.

(b) All unusable detection limits (qualified "R").3) Appendix C - Results as Reported by the Laboratory for All

Target Compounds4) Appendix D - Reviewed and Corrected Tentatively Identified

Compounds5) Appendix E - DPO Report for Contractual Compliance6) Appendix F - Support Documentation

DCN - DM910A13

flR300226

Appendix A

Glossary of Data Qualifiers

flR300227

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES (ORGANIC)

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U = Not detected. THe associated number indicates. approximate sample concentration necessary to bedetected.

(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reportedin laboratory or field blanks.

R_= Unreliable result. Analyte may or may not bepresent in tlie sample. Supporting data necessary toconfirm result.. *

N = Tentative identification. 'Consider present--Special methods may be needed; to confirm itspresence or absence in future sampling efforts.

CODES RELATED _CQ OUANTITATION . . . . . . . . . . . .(can" be used for both positive results and sample qiaantitationlimits):

J = Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurateor precise./

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high.Actual value is expected to be lower,

L « Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low.Actual value is expected to be higher.

UJ -"Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurateor imprecise.

UL « Not detected, quantitation limit is probably higher.

PTHER CODES ... ....... __.._ • ... ....Q = No analytical result.

AR300228

Appendix B

Data Summary Forms

R300229

cr

A *—

oa4a.

•

•

•

-

-

<fl

z «o ISc.

5E w§ c£ Ul

c 5< ^£CO1O

Vus

v^

>>~J

»•

i5»

- - — -

i*sS-

1i"8

•

i

.T*

••4

*•••

TSQ

OJCaEn

'x

N T

•n«O

— — —

•gu.

SAa

9 R—

M

v)

"Xv)NJ

^

\A

NJ

^

^

O

O

\J

o

9C.

3

—

—

"-*-»

•-_»

*

-

•

) Dilution Factor

U

a \f- "Q1 1=---

2

v^

-r

£

V .

OP — . ^ ,o

.

1 is

) Location

> >COMPOUND

UZJUfS

•5ieC

t5

o5OVI

•3

Q.OO

§N *1

,3-DlchIorobenzene

* 1 .

4-DIchtorobenzene

"o"5o

*Ea

-,

1|o5wa

0

-sc1"t!•2CM

O

t

"SaocLomO3CC!*-S

o

oEJc2

0

aoc.e•56Ma

1

o

MexAcliloroelltan«

o

•

KHrobefizent

o.-

i51*

o

11

o

--

"o

1VM"

o...

33u

oa£o

S

1

C

o

•s"Hc

Its

o

i I^X-TiJchlofobenienc

o

ojXc_r

o

:

C

o

Mz -52 Sii - iE • »

Mw •>Q eUlOOUCC£ •LU>

eC f ~zuutf!

•Ti"5LU

*eJ'C_o?«

1c_o75TSQ

RDU

* Contract Required

O

. . . .

r-i

*•Q

c4

*8a.i

t

i-

«

CO

<= m03 -J

C.S

s S§ Bu. u1 iEEto

io

Xib-0wVA

%*k;_-,ui.

1IS\

**eE«Z

•CO

•

s•s&

_•

£

1

r-*•\*4

ci(s-

•••••m_®~tiO

OJ±"aE•iCft

*t

\l-4 t

^^H J

^ i5"• *%

*«

^

S•Qu.

d

R:

"OU^^vj

uVi-*.V\J

"•s.

u-

vjw

nu•*»\JM

M

M

"*sJU

•*.U.%Nj

VI

0U*N,

VJ

dZe"a5U)

n

^

*_

—

-

-».

—

4

^

Dilution Factor

n

^ 5S

vUU 9 ^ tfll.u.~N« *» -H.* -a * i? t;3-V Sa,* $

t-A*•i^

^>•

I^^

?Eii^

^ ^^5 *_AJt V^^ a*j-^ ^ -._ __ i ^^t & °^ C^vj\ VO

Location

COMPOUND

23 1 *do j g

HflKiclilofobulnUIefiD

Q

4>ChJofo-3 melhytptienol'

o

•J*

"c.•iTI2N

o

1 texactilof o

cyclope-nlfttfl-fio

o*-

•3§c.oo35to.-rfM

O

2,4 ,5*Tr

tcl iJof op! i enol

9

IS

"c.K

1OCM

O

2-NtUo*n_in«

t>5~m

f7

O

I

"o.

J,

O

2.0 DlnlUotohjefl.

o

•c•o

n

pA

|

"__.m

O

b3

H3:

Wi~r •

H"•

9

*cr

>-»-T

•3£"5.o

^M

"31Iz4-

<?S>

OK>enzofm*n

o

£S3

*rCM

O

CXfrlhytphIli«l»l«

o

t£•E

|'Q

1fr

<r

O

•

fluofen*

o

XN/Uoindne

•5|"c

ȣCMO

e-r

« Sz 5.o « ,

5 "2u. 5S 1 A_ * •o-Oeou.LU>

gCCzLUUICO

•«TeLU

! •£3<

f2cJ2"o_B^

IDL

» Contract Required

I

•

fci.U

. . -

IsaB» a • e .. t. n--i «j

"3dP> a F?

05*_ S

ou-

S

w

1

U}-4 A

Q

OC

.t

CO O

M

VJ

CJ

'ft

.-*

SJ

fj3

— J

>J\JdZ

"c.«

—

—

-_»

--••

™""

"n*.

—

Dilution Faclor^ ^V

•17

Q . ^

M3

^

5

|. x-»

I as-n'"

t |

Location

COMPOUND

gS

N-NltroscKJIplienylanitno

o

t

1"S,

I"g

oo

o

f

Mlexachtorobenzene

o

OCO

o

"o

*_:c0. Ph

enanlhrene

o

1o

CH n butylpMtiilatfl

o

pyjofanthcme

o

£cJ

o

3n

1£

§

o

3.3-DldiIorobeniIdlno

o

Bemo(ft)anttuBceno

o

£r»O

O

^

*

e

"a|iUJ

Cl*>2

o

c_

—>.

«rt~

-»D

can•--_.

«*cc

i

te

^

Dt n-

octytotilhil-to

o

£

seo*«Eto

o

oiceo3

£c£a

o

£|"S£a

o

.lndeno(l.?.3-c<flpYT«ri0

c,

Dbenr(«.h)intfinceno

o

Ic£

"cEa

o

We

^ H-\ t

oa

crt wo . $"

LU ,iu t •;Q IU2aouou.

trczLU01CO

xu

co

3cr

-Jo300-232

wt

*aeu

CO

CQoa.

Q: |Ul UJQ g

O

H

IU

a.»*

c.ou.cs N2 Vs_co i

^ 5g ^-4

,

*|

g-

1

<c

•*s.

••-

if*t*Q

a-5"H.

5

** fr

io

T1u.

'

—

^

0

1

V

-A—1

r*

V,

VJ

•U>\j\:

|

-

-

-

-*«

".

-*•

-•-*

. 4.O 0zl3. tt-

a

?3C

^ ?*"

k ||V- —

_^ s^ NJ

1

1-iCk

j? AJ *j*^i .

1 i

<-.,

Location

ro CO '

COMPOUND

-ja

o5it

£•*

o

O5*•a

v-o

OS•iTG

•no

*Gamma-BHC

(Llndane)

P

'HvpUchlor

?

1

S

I111

o

jq

Dltkltln

o

UJ

VV

o

"Endrln

Endosullin

11

OgVV

?Ja§

J!

M

Endosull

o

-pV-r

O

.

73xo

I

ijC

1tu

O

'Aloha-Chlordano

Qainma-Chlordana

*•»

ocID

QMXO

o

(Oo

_o73o<

<f>

esi

73o<

•C

CNcs*_o73o<

•-)

-res•

"od<

o-rNi

"Lo<

3

-rin(S

L

C<

3

o-o-r.k.C(Jc<

c

»'

ntioo vi oj HAIIVUUVN

sj

**«•t_

e_o

«

13s_ooJB

C•eow&CC

•__iOC0

I ,*-

2568A RIVA ROADSUITE 300ANNAPOLIS. MD 21401PHONE: 301~-266-9887

CHiC-NESS CONSULTANTS •'. .:

DATE: OCTOBER 19, 1989

SUBJECT: INORGANIC DATA VALIDATION, CASE 12788 (SAS 4941C-Task2)SITE: STANLEY KESSLER

FROM: MAHBOOBEH MECANICESAT SENIOR INORGANIC DATA REVIEWER

TO: THERESA A. SIMPSONESAT DEPUTY PROJECT OFFICER

THRU: RICHARD D. DRESSERESAT ACTING TEAM MANAGER

OVERVIEW ,,„...._._. „_...„._... '._...

The, set of samples for Case 12788 (SAS 4941C Task2)contained seven (7) aqueous samples, which wereanalyzed through the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)Special Analytical Services. The sample set containedone (1) equipment blank and one (1) field duplicatepair.

The action level (10-day health advisory limits) wasexceeded for the Pb analyte in three (3) samples assummarized in the following table:

Reported ActionResult Level

Sample- fuq/L) fug/LV

MCX683 71.6 20

MCX684 89.6 20

MCX686 25.3 20

SUMMARY .._'_.. ...,__. ... .. . :_ ..: ..

All analytes with the exception of As were successfullyanalyzed in all samples. Areas of concern with respectto data usability are listed according to theseriousness of the problem. These include:

Page 2 of 3

MAJOR EROBLEM

The matrix spike recovery was extremely low (<30%) forthe As analyte. The quantitation limits,for As may bebiased extremely low and, therefore, have beenqualified "R" (unreliable).

HIKOR ISSUgg

The preparation blank had reported results that were>IDL for the Ca and Zn analytes. The reported resultsfor these analytes in the affected samples which are<5x the blank concentration may be biased high and,therefore, have been qualified "B".

The equipment blank had reported results that were >IDLfor the Cu, Pb and Zn analytes. The reported resultsfor these analytes in the affected samples which are<5x the blank concentration may be biased high and,therefore, have been qualified "B".

The laboratory duplicate results were outside, of thecontrol limits for the Al and Hg analytes. Therefore,the quantitation limits and reported results for the Aland Hg analytes have been qualified estimated, "UJ" and"J", respectively.

The percent differences (%D!s) of the serial dilutionwere greater than 10% control limit for the Na and Znanalytes. Therefore, the reported results for Na andZn have been qualified estimated, "J"; excluding thereported results for Zn which have been qualified *BWdue to blank contamination.

The correlation coefficient of the calibration standardcurve was <0.995 for the Se analyte. Therefore, thequantitation limits for Se have been qualifiedestimated, "UJ".

The matrix spike recoveries were low for the Se and Tlanalytes. The quantitation limits for the Tl analytemay be biased low and, therefore, have; been qualified"UL". The quantitation limits for Se Bay .be biasedlow, however, they have been qualified "UJ" aspreviously mentioned.

4R300235

Page 3 of 3

Several samples had low analytical spike recoveries- forthe Se and Tl analytes. The quantitation limits forthese analytes in the affected samples may be biasedlow and, therefore, have been qualified "UL"; excludingthe quantitation limits for Se which have beenqualified ".UJ"---as previously mentioned.

Notes:

The cyanide analysis of samples MCX683 and MCX684* hadelevated detection limits due to the reduced samplesize used by the laboratory 'as a result of insufficientsample volume.

The data was reviewed in accordance with the NationalFunctional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analyses. *INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT CONTENT ............

Table 1A is a summary of qualifiers added to thelaboratory's results during evaluation.

ATTACHMENTS

TABLE 1A _._.. SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARYAFTER DATA VALIDATION

TABLE IB CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN -

TABLE 2 GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

TABLE 3 DATA SUMMARY FORM

APPENDIX A RESULTS REPORTED BY LABORATORYFORM Is - - - .

APPENDIX B DPO REPORT

KM910A07.STA

HR300236

TABLE 1A

SUMMARY 07 QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARYAFTER DATA VALIDATION

KOM-POSITIVB DETECTED

SAMPLES AFFECTED VALUES VALUES BIAS COMMENTS*

Al All samples J UJ ' A (20.6%)

As All samples R extremely B (14.8%)Low

Ca MCX68S B High C (78.9 ppb)

Cu MCX689 B High D (5.1 ppb)

Pb MCX689 B High D (1.8 ppb)

Hg All samples " J UJ A (±0.2 ppb)

Se MCX683; MCX684 UJ E (0.9913)F (56%)G (71-81%)

MCX685 - MCX689 UJ E (0.9913)F (56%)

Na All samples except J H (10.6%)MCX688

Tl All samples except UL F (73.9%)MCX688 G (55-73%)

MCX688 UL F (73. 9*)

Zn MCX683; MCX684? J H (21%)MCX686; MCX687

MCX685; MCX689 B High D (25.4 ppb)H (21%)

MCX688 B High C (14.3 ppb)H (21%)

* See explanation of comments in Table IB.

SR300237

TABLE IB

CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN

A = The laboratory duplicate results were outside of the controllimits + CRDL or RPD >20% (CRDL or relative percent difference isin parentheses). Therefore, the quantitation limits and reportedresults are estimated.

B = Due to an extremely low matrix spike recovery (% recovery is inparentheses), the quantitation limits may be biased extremely low.

C =- The preparation blank had a result ->IDL (the result is inparentheses) and'the reported results were <5x the blank. Thereported;, results ..may be biased high".

D = The equipment blank had a result >IDL (the result is inparentheses) and the reported results were <5x the blank. Thereported results may be biased high.

E = The correlation coefficient of the calibration standard curve was<0.995. Therefore, the quantitation limits are estimated.

F = Due to a low matrix spike recovery (% recovery is in parentheses),the quantitation limits may be biased low.

G = Due to the low analytical spike recoveries (% recoveries are inparentheses), the quantitation limits may be biased low.

H — The percent difference of the serial dilution was greater than the10% control limit (%D is in parentheses). Therefore, the reportedresults are estimated.

R300238

TABLE 2

GIXDSSASY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES (INORGANIC)

CODES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION ..___.. _._. ...._,(confidence concerning presence or absence of analytes):

U = Not detected. The associated number indicatesapproximate sample concentration necessary to bedetected.

(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.

B •« Not detected substantially above the level reportedin laboratory or field blanks.

R = Unreliable result, Analyte may or may not bepresent in the sample. Supporting data necessaryto confirm result.

CODES RELATED TO OUANTITATION _._.. ._„.... .__ „ ._,.__(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitationlimits):

J - Analyte Present. Reported value say not beaccurate or precise.

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biasedhigh. Actual value its expected to be lower.

L « Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low.Actual value is expected to be higher.

[] *= Analyte present. As values approach the IDL thequantitation may not be accurate.

UJ = Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurateor imprecise.

UL = Not detected, quantitation limit is probablyhigher.

OTHER CODES

Q - No analytical result.

AR30Q239

n_3Cr

aa

oa.

>no

mrn

3oOamaSZ

Ia !o

O

U

CM

M

M

Vj

1

v

m I L-.l krl-.i k-l I L.I I i t I i t I ! 1 Ik,! \<A ^ I KM -pS

r

r

s?

Ul l£

CA

a

c-

Vt

•it

Cg

a

U

U

VI

S

CM i i F i t~f i i i r r i <> i it\

O

(jt

twy

o

O

OJ

Vj

•t.

c

P>

O

K*, -o

k.

7-

N.

a

Oj

-Uoo. . . . . . . . _. ,. .^

X

3)_aH i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i om I I I I I I \ | | | | 1 I | | | I | | I 1 j | | | | | | f w

s i 1 1 1 i i M M M 1 1 M i I i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 U l l

t*

c

Vj

U

u

Loc

ANALY MTl fflttd =^z§??

E

uS

r*^K

ft

O

4>Mv»-J>

A

3

TN:*>c-<~

icoC

-no3

5 3

Cw z ^UO3O>Z

o

etrt

"29

? i

WATER LEVEL DATA- HERMIT DATA LOGGER -COLUMBIA BOILER WELL

(ft) TIME __ DAY89.97 1225- . . . . . 10/13/8990.00 202589.98 0425 .10 /L 4/89 . _ ,89.97 122590.02 2025 . . . .90.00 0425 .. 10/15/8990.00 122590.04 2025 _ _... ._.. . . . . = .-.__. .,90.04 0425 . , . _ .10/16/8990.01 1225 . _ . ,90.04 2025 . . . . . .90.02 0425 . .. 10/17/8989.95 122589.99 202590.12 0425 . 10/19/8990.14 1225 . ; . ;90.20 2025 : :90.19 0425 10/20/8990.15 1225 ... ... ;

: ——————————————————————————————— -•-• END TEST

91.04 160091.07 2400 . . ...91.05 0800 .11/18/8991.07 160091.12 240091.12 0800 11/19/8990.99 1600 .. .90.87 240090.80 0800 .._. 11/20/8990.65 1600 . ., ,. .90.98 2400

-RESTART TEST

8R3002U

90.91--. ----- 0800 11/21/8990.99. . .1600 . ..„, ..91.06 ....._.__...._._.. 2400 - _..;:_..::91.07 0800 11/22/8991.01 . - - ..... ... 1600 . . : . . . . . . .90.96 . ". 240090.99 ... 0800——'—————-. ... 11/23/8991.03 - ..... 1600 . " . " ' ,91.07 - . . . . . . 2400.91.12-. ... - 0800. _ ' 11/24/8991.11 : " :::T--- -1600 . _.:._ .. ...91.10 . . 240091.06 -- ...0800 ~": 11/25/8991.00 ;' .160091.05 ... . . -. ... . 240091.01 . - 0800 11/26/8991.10 . 160091.20 240091.22 0800 11/27/8991.16 " 1600 .91.11' . . -240091,05 — . ......_ - -0800 11/28/8991.15 - .:._.-._J.600." • • . ' . • • '91.26 2400 " / "" "91.28 ... . -0800 . , 11/29/8991.30 . ' 1600 :.91.27 - 2400'91.22- . —- 0800' " 11/30/8991.23 ... - ------160091.31 --••-...-• ....- -2400 .: - ... "91.37 0800 . . . . . . . . 12/1/8991.38 ' . ..__ -.160091.39.. :•-.:-:...: .._. ,2400 .-..--—.---.---

91.31 -- - ..::_ 0800 _ 12/2/8991.14 - - - - - 160091.20 2400 ' -

91.20 0800 12/3/89 .91.27 1600 _-91.33 2400 . . . . . . . . .91.39 0800 - - 12/4/8391.33 . 160091.32 240091.38 0800 12/5/8.9 .

TEST