Date post: | 11-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | samirsinh-parmar |
View: | 1,006 times |
Download: | 1 times |
1
TRIAXIAL TEST (STRESS CONTROLLED – STRAIN CONTROLLED)
Course: GEOTECHNICAL MEASUREMENT AND EXPLORATION
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTIIT KANPUR (INDIA)
TERM PAPER PRESENTATION
BY SUVRA SAMAL
Prof. SAMIRSINH P PARMAR
2
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION: TRIAXIAL TEST REVIEW DETAIL TRIAXIAL TEST RESULT ANALYSIS OF TRIAXIAL TEST STRESS- STRAIN CONTROL TEST COMMENT ON STRESS- STRAIN CONTROL
TEST ADVANCEMENT IN TRIAXIAL TEST REFERANCES
3
SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL
Determination of soil strength parameters ( c and f ) in the lab
1- Direct Shear Test2- Unconfined Compression Test3- Triaxial Compression Test
To determine the shear strength of soil Mohr-Coulomb Yield Criterion is used
t = c + sn tan f
Soil CohesionAngle of Friction
Where : c & Ø are shear strength parameters
4
STATE OF STRESS IN TRIAXIAL TEST
Pore Water Pressure u
σc
σc
q
q
σcσc
σa = q +σc = σ1
Specimen Length L
Specimen Area A
ε = Axial Strain = ΔL/L
σ1 = Major Principle Stress = Axial Stress σa
σ3 = Minor Principle Stress = Radial Stress σr
q= Deviator stress = F/A = Axial Load/ Area
σr = σc =σ3 σ‘1 = Major Principle Effective Stress = σ1-u
σ‘3= Minor Principle Effective stress = σ3-u
5
BRIEF REVIEW
Year Authors Title of Paper/ Research1924 Buisman and
Hveem Initial Triaxial device was invented
1930 Cassagrande, Karl Terzaghi
The first device that was similar to modern equipment was developed
1957 Bishop and Henkel
designed new test technique for Triaxial test
1962 Bishop and Henkel
published first book on Triaxial testing named, “The measurement of soil properties in the Triaxial test”.
1971 Seed and Silver
performed strain controlled test at very small strains
1975 Kovari V. and Tisa A.
described multiple failure state and strain controlled triaxial test
6
BRIEF REVIEWYear Authors Title of Paper/ Research1975 Bishop and
Welsley carry out plane strain tests , true triaxial load.
1981 Deveaux D. , Vuez A., Amoros D.
developed technology for stress and strain controlled automatic parameter acquisition system for Triaxial test.
1988 Carrol, W.F developed fast Triaxial test device. performed nonlinear wave analysis to study the stress and strain rate effects on the results of soil parameters.
1988 Akitoshi M. Masato M. and Shinichi T.
developed independent principle stress control apparatus
1997 Claudio D. and Silvia I.
performed experimental analysis and theoretical interpretation of Triaxial load controlled loose sand specimen collapse.
7
Example applications of triaxial test:
Stability of shallow foundation or excavation in
soft clayCyclic loading of gravity base structure
Effect of shallow gas on cyclic behaviour of dense sand
9
Ref: Department of Construction Engineering Advanced Geotechnical Laboratory Chaoyang University of Technology
MERCURY CONTROL DEVICE
10
Triaxial Compression Test
1- Unconsolidated Undrained Test (UU)
Step 1 Step 2
sn
t
cu
t= c
s2 s1s2 s1s2 s1
s1 - s2
s1 - s2
s2 s2
s2
s2
ConfiningPressure
s1 = Ds + s2
s2
Ds
Ds
s2
s2
e
Dss2
Ds Failure
Deviator Stress
1. Consolidation Valve Closed
2. ShearingValve Closed
11
Step 1 Step 2
Triaxial Compression Test2- Consolidated Undrained Test (CU)
fu
sn
t
cu
t= c + sn tan
f
e
Dss2
Ds Failure
s2s1s2 s1s2 s1
s1 - s2
s1 - s2
s2s2s2 s2
s2 s2s2 s2
s2
s2
ConfiningPressure
Ds
Ds
Ds
s1 = Ds + s2
Deviator Stress
s2
s2
1. Consolidation Valve Open
2. ShearingValve Closed
12
Step 1 Step 2
Triaxial Compression Test3- Consolidated Drained Test (CD)
fd
sn
t
cd
t= c + sn tan
f
s2s1s2 s1s2 s1
s1 - s2
s1 - s2
s2 s2
s2
s2
ConfiningPressure
s1 = Ds + s2
s2
Ds
Ds
s2
s2
e
Dss2
Ds Failure
Deviator Stress
2. ShearingValve Open
1. Consolidation Valve Open
13
RATE OF STRAIN AND DRAINAGE CONDITION IN TYPES OF TRIAXIAL TESTS
Test Rate of axial strain Drainage condition
UU Fastest. failure occur within 20 to 25 minutes
Drainage valves are closed
CU Slow enough to adequate equalisation of excess pore
water pressure
Drainage valves are closed and excess pore water pressure
measured
CD Slow enough to result in negligible pore pressure
variation
Drainage valves are opened and ΔV measured
14
STRESS CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST
In this type of test axial stress is increased by pre-decided increments and the vertical deformation of the sample measured.
Stress controlled tests were carried out by imposing finite load increments.
The load increments are followed by time periods at constant stress level.
The Stress-controlled test at the stress level characterized by a mobilized friction angle suffers a sudden collapse.
15
STRAIN CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST
Soil specimen sheared at a uniform strain rate.
Shear force acting on soil specimen measured using proving ring.
The stress vs. strain curve observed after the peak point.
Continuous stress vs. strain curve available so at every corresponding value of strain, stress is available and vice a versa.
16
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF STRESS- CONTROLLED VS. STRAIN CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST
Strain ε
Stre
ss σ
Strain Controlled TestStress Controlled Test
Stress increased from one stage to another
Continuous behavior of stress vs. strain observed
Failure Point
ε1 ε2
σ1
σ2
Stress increased from σ1 to σ2 and in between the failure occurs then the corresponding value of strain at failure (εf) not available in stress controlled test
εf
17
COMMENT OF STRESS CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST
Peak shear resistance can be only approximated because failure occurs at a stress level somewhere between the pre failure load increment and the failure load increment
(i.e. the failure load may be in between the two stages of load increment and exact failure load may be approximated)
Only the peak shear resistance can be observed and plotted.
Simulated field conditions like… Foundations, stage wise construction of structure
on soil etc.
18
COMMENT OF STRESS CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST Stress controlled test are preferred for
conducting shear test at very slow rate. Why? Because applied load can easily be kept
constant for any given period of time.
19
COMMENT OF STRAIN CONTROLLED TRIAXIAL TEST Most widely used. Focus on interdependence of peak strength
and loading history. Advantage: Peak shear resistance (at failure) as well as
lesser shear resistance (residual stress – ultimate strength) can be observed and plotted.
Simulates field Conditions like… Embankment, retaining wall, slope stability
etc.
20
ADVANCEMENT IN TRIAXIAL TEST
Triaxial test options now a days Isotropic, anisotropic and Ko-consolidation Monotonic and cyclic loading Drained and undrained shearing Stress-strain-strength properties Creep tests Special testing programs Temperature controlled test Frozen triaxial test High pressure- high temperature triaxial test Large scale triaxial test.
21
SOIL PARAMETERS DERIVED FOR RESEARCH OF FIELD CONDITIONS LIKE…
Rainfall induced landslide. Swelling soil. Collapsible soil, and Dynamic effect on geotechnical structures.
22
CONCLUSION:
More realistic Reasonably accurate results Better control over drainage Various modifications can be possible to
simulate field conditions. Advance instruments are available. Ease of Combination with computer
software's. Use of data loggers, gauges and sensors
makes it fool proof for research, where accuracy is important.
23
REFERENCES Bishop, A. W., and D. J. Henkel, “The Measurement of Soil Properties in the
Triaxial Test,” 2d ed., Edward Arnold, London, 1969. Kovari,K : “Multiple Failure State and strain controlled Triaxial tests” Rock
Mechanics 7,pp. 17-33(1975) , Springer-Verlag 1975. Vaid,Y. P. , Negussey, D., and Zergoun, M.,”A Stress-and strain-controlled
monotonic and Cyclic Loading System,” Advanced Triaxial testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, Robert T. Donaghe, Ronald C.Chaney, and Marshall L. Silver, Eds. , American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1987 , pp.119-131,(1987)
Mochizuki, A. , Mikasa, M. , and Takahashi, S. , ”A New Independent Principal Stress Control Apparatus,” Advance Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, Robert T. Donag7he, Ronald C. Chaney, and Marshall L. Silver, Eds., American Society for testing and Materials,Philadelphia,1988, pp. 844-858.(1988).
Prisco, Di Claudio., and Imposimato, Silvia. “Experimental Analysis and Theoretical Interpretation of Triaxial Load controlled Loose Sand Specimen Collapses” Mechanics of Cohesive Frictional materials, VOL. 2, 93-120(1997)
Sitharam, T.G. , Ravishankar B.V. , Patil S.M. “Liquefaction and Pore Water Pressure Generation in Sand: Cyclic Strain Controlled Triaxial Tests”,3(1), pp.57-85,January-June 2012.