CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
1
AUDIT OF INVENTORIES
PROBLEM NO. 1
Presented below is a list of items that may or may not reported as inventory in a company’s
December 31 balance sheet.
1. Goods out on consignment at another company’s store P800,000
2. Goods sold on installment basis 100,000
3. Goods purchased f.o.b. shipping point that are in transit
at December 31
120,000
4. Goods purchased f.o.b. destination that are in transit at
December 31
200,000
5. Goods sold to another company, for which our company
has signed an agreement to repurchase at a set price that
covers all costs related to the inventory
300,000
6. Goods sold where large returns are predictable 280,000
7. Goods sold f.o.b. shipping point that are in transit December 31
120,000
8. Freight charges on goods purchased 80,000
9. Factory labor costs incurred on goods still unsold 50,000
10. Interest cost incurred for inventories that are routinely
manufactured
40,000
11. Costs incurred to advertise goods held for resale 20,000
12. Materials on hand not yet placed into production 350,000
13. Office supplies 10,000
14. Raw materials on which a the company has started
production, but which are not completely processed
280,000
15. Factory supplies 20,000
16. Goods held on consignment from another company 450,000
17. Costs identified with units completed but not yet sold 260,000
18. Goods sold f.o.b. destination that are in transit at December 31
40,000
19. Temporary investment in stocks and bonds that will be
resold in the near future
500,000
Question:
How much of these items would typically be reported as inventory in the financial statements?
a. P2,300,000 c. P2,260,000
b. P2,000,000 d. P2,220,000
Suggested Solution:
PAS 2 par. 6 defines “Inventories” as assets a. held for sale in the ordinary course of business; b. in the process of production for such sale; or c. in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the
rendering of services. Par. 10 further states that the cost of inventories shall comprise all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.
Therefore, items 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17 and 18 would be reported as inventory in the financial statements.
The other items will be reported as follows:
Item 2 - Cost of goods sold in the income statement Item 4 - Not reported in the financial statements
Item 6 - Cost of goods sold in the income statement
Item 7 - Cost of goods sold in the income statement
Item 10 - Interest expense in the income statement
Item 11 - Advertising expense in the income statement
Item 13 - Office supplies in the current asset section of the balance
sheet
Item 16 - Not reported in the financial statements
Item 19 - Trading securities in the current asset section of the balance
sheet
Answer: A
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
2
PROBLEM NO. 2
In connection with your audit of the Alcala Manufacturing Company, you reviewed its inventory as
of December 31, 2006 and found the following items:
(a) A packing case containing a product costing P100,000 was standing in the shipping room when
the physical inventory was taken. It was not included in the inventory because it was marked “Hold for shipping instructions.” The customer’s order was dated December 18, but the case
was shipped and the costumer billed on January 10, 2007.
(b) Merchandise costing P600,000 was received on December 28, 2006, and the invoice was recorded. The invoice was in the hands of the purchasing agent; it was marked “On
consignment”.
(c) Merchandise received on January 6, 2007, costing P700,000 was entered in purchase register
on January 7. The invoice showed shipment was made FOB shipping point on December 31, 2006. Because it was not on hand during the inventory count, it was not included.
(d) A special machine costing P200,000, fabricated to order for a particular customer, was finished
in the shipping room on December 30. The customer was billed for P300,000 on that date and
the machine was excluded from inventory although it was shipped January 4, 2007.
(e) Merchandise costing P200,000 was received on January 6, 2007, and the related purchase
invoice was recorded January 5. The invoice showed the shipment was made on December 29,
2006, FOB destination.
(f) Merchandise costing P150,000 was sold on an installment basis on December 15. The customer
took possession of the goods on that date. The merchandise was included in inventory because
Alcala still holds legal title. Historical experience suggests that full payment on installment sale
is received approximately 99% of the time.
(g) Goods costing P500,000 were sold and delivered on December 20. The goods were included in
the inventory because the sale was accompanied by a purchase agreement requiring Alcala to
buy back the inventory in February 2007.
Question:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, how much of these items should be included in the
inventory balance at December 31, 2006?
a. P1,300,000 c. P1,650,000
b. P 800,000 d. P1,050,000
Suggested Solution:
Unshipped goods P 100,000
Purchased merchandise shipped
FOB shipping point
700,000
Goods used as collateral for a loan 500,000
Total P1,300,000
Reasons for including and excluding the items:
a) Included - Merchandise should be included in the inventory until shipped. An exception would be special orders.
b) Excluded - Alcala Manufacturing has the merchandise on a consignment basis and therefore does not possess legal title.
c) Included - The merchandise was shipped FOB shipping point and therefore would be included in the inventory on the shipping date.
d) Excluded - Title may pass on special orders when segregated for shipment. e) Excluded - The merchandise was shipped FOB destination and was not received until January 3,
2006. f) Excluded - Historical experience suggests that Alcala will collect the full purchase price, so the sale
is recognized even though legal title has not passed. g) Included - This is not a sale of inventory but instead is a loan with the inventory as collateral.
Answer: A
PROBLEM NO. 3
The Anda Company is on a calendar year basis. The following data were found during your audit:
a. Goods in transit shipped FOB destination by a supplier, in the amount of P100,000, had been
excluded from the inventory, and further testing revealed that the purchase had been recorded.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
3
b. Goods costing P50,000 had been received, included in inventory, and recorded as a purchase.
However, upon your inspection the goods were found to be defective and would be immediately
returned.
c. Materials costing P250,000 and billed on December 30 at a selling price of P320,000, had been
segregated in the warehouse for shipment to a customer. The materials had been excluded from
inventory as a signed purchase order had been received from the customer. Terms, FOB
destination.
d. Goods costing P70,000 was out on consignment with Hermie Company. Since the monthly
statement from Hermie Company listed those materials as on hand, the items had been
excluded from the final inventory and invoiced on December 31 at P80,000.
e. The sale of P150,000 worth of materials and costing P120,000 had been shipped FOB point of
shipment on December 31. However, this inventory was found to be included in the final
inventory. The sale was properly recorded in 2005.
f. Goods costing P100,000 and selling for P140,000 had been segregated, but not shipped at
December 31, and were not included in the inventory. A review of the customer’s purchase
order set forth terms as FOB destination. The sale had not been recorded.
g. Your client has an invoice from a supplier, terms FOB shipping point but the goods had not
arrived as yet. However, these materials costing P170,000 had been included in the inventory
count, but no entry had been made for their purchase.
h. Merchandise costing P200,000 had been recorded as a purchase but not included as inventory.
Terms of sale are FOB shipping point according to the supplier’s invoice which had arrived at
December 31.
Further inspection of the client’s records revealed the following December 31, 2006 balances:
Inventory, P1,100,000; Accounts receivable, P580,000; Accounts payable, P690,000; Net sales,
P5,050,000; Net purchases, P2,300,000; Net income, P510,000.
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, determine the adjusted balances of following as of
December 31, 2006:
1. Inventory
a. P1,230,000 c. P1,550,000
b. P1,650,000 d. P1,480,000
2. Accounts payable
a. P710,000 c. P810,000
b. P540,000 d. P760,000
3. Net sales
a. P4,550,000 c. P4,730,000 b. P4,650,000 d. P4,970,000
4. Net purchases
a. P2,370,000 c. P2,150,000
b. P2,420,000 d. P2,320,000
5. Net income
a. P220,000 c. P540,000
b. P290,000 d. P550,000
Suggested Solution:
Questions No. 1 to 5
Inventory
Accounts Payable
Net Sales
Net Purchases
Net Income
Unadjusted balances
P1,100,000
P690,000
P5,050,000
P2,300,000
P510,000
(a) - (100,000) - (100,000) 100,000 (b) (50,000) (50,000) - (50,000) - (c) 250,000 - (320,000) - (70,000) (d) 70,000 - (80,000) - (10,000) (e) (120,000) - - - (120,000) (f) 100,000 - - - 100,000
(g) - 170,000 - 170,000 (170,000) (h) 200,000 - - - 200,000
Adjusted balances
P1,550,000
P710,000
P4,650,000
P2,320,000
P540,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
4
PROBLEM NO. 4
You were engaged by Asingan Corporation for the audit of the company’s financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006. The company is engaged in the wholesale business and makes
all sales at 25% over cost.
The following were gathered from the client’s accounting records:
S A L E S P U R C H A S E S Date Reference Amount Date Reference Amount
Balance forwarded P7,800,000 Balance forwarded P4,200,000 12/27 SI No. 965 60,000 12/28 RR #1059 36,000 12/28 SI No. 966 225,000 12/30 RR #1061 105,000 12/28 SI No. 967 15,000 12/31 RR #1062 63,000 12/31 SI No. 969 69,000 12/31 RR #1063 96,000 12/31 SI No. 970 102,000 12/31 Closing entry
(4,500,000) 12/31 SI No. 971 24,000 P -
12/31 Closing entry (8,295,000)
P -
Note: SI = Sales Invoice RR = Receiving Report
Accounts receivable P750,000
Inventory 900,000
Accounts payable 600,000
You observed the physical inventory of goods in the warehouse on December 31 and were satisfied
that it was properly taken.
When performing sales and purchases cut-off tests, you found that at December 31, the last
Receiving Report which had been used was No. 1063 and that no shipments had been made on any
Sales Invoices whose number is larger than No. 968. You also obtained the following additional
information:
a) Included in the warehouse physical inventory at December 31 were goods which had been
purchased and received on Receiving Report No. 1060 but for which the invoice was not received
until the following year. Cost was P27,000.
b) On the evening of December 31, there were two trucks in the company siding:
Truck No. XXX 888 was unloaded on January 2 of the following year and received on
Receiving Report No. 1063. The freight was paid by the vendor.
Truck No. MGM 357 was loaded and sealed on December 31 but leave the company
premises on January 2. This order was sold for P150,000 per Sales Invoice No. 968.
c) Temporarily stranded at December 31 at the railroad siding were two delivery trucks enroute to
ABC Trading Corporation. ABC received the goods, which were sold on Sales Invoice No. 966 terms FOB Destination, the next day.
d) Enroute to the client on December 31 was a truckload of goods, which was received on Receiving
Report No. 1064. The goods were shipped FOB Destination, and freight of P2,000 was paid by
the client. However, the freight was deducted from the purchase price of P800,000.
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, determine the following:
1. Sales for the year ended December 31, 2006
a. P8,100,000 c. P7,875,000
b. P7,725,000 d. P8,025,000
2. Purchases for the year ended December 31, 2006
a. P4,500,000 c. P5,631,000
b. P5,727,000 d. P4,527,000
3. Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2006
a. P330,000 c. P525,000
b. P555,000 d. P180,000
4. Inventory as of December 31, 2006
a. P1,452,000 c. P1,200,000
b. P1,221,000 d. P1,296,000
5. Accounts payable as of December 31, 2006
a. P600,000 c. P 531,000
b. P627,000 d. P1,827,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
5
Suggested Solution:
Questions No. 1 to 5
Sales
Purchases
AR
Inventory
AP
Unadjusted balances
P8,295,000
P4,500,000
P750,000
P900,000
P600,000
AJE No. 1 (195,000) - (195,000) - - AJE No. 2 - 27,000 - - 27,000 AJE No. 3 - - - 96,000 - AJE No. 4 - - - 120,000 - AJE No. 5 (225,000) - (225,000) - - AJE No. 6 - - - 180,000 -
Adjusted balances
P7,875,000
P4,527,000
P330,000
P1,296,000
P627,000
Adjusting entries:
1) Sales (P69,000+P102,000+P24,000) P195,000
Accounts receivable P195,000 To adjust unshipped goods recorded as sales (SI No. 969, 970 and 971)
2) Purchases P27,000 Accounts payable P27,000
To take up unrecorded purchases (RR No. 1060)
3) Inventory P96,000
Cost of sales P96,000 To take up goods under RR No. 1063
4) Inventory (P150,000/1.25) P120,000
Cost of sales P120,000 To take up unshipped goods under SI No. 968
5) Sales P225,000
Accounts receivable P225,000 To reverse entry made to record SI No. 966
6) Inventory (P225,000/1.25) P180,000
Cost of sales P180,000 To take up goods under SI No. 966
Answers: 1) C; 2) D; 3) A; 4) D, 5) B
PROBLEM NO. 5
Balungao Company engaged you to examine its books and records for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2006. The company’s accountant has furnished you not only the copy of trial balance as of June
30, 2006 but also the copy of company’s balance sheet and income statement as at said date. The
following data appears in the cost of goods sold section of the income statement:
Inventory, July 1, 2005 Add Purchases
P 500,000 3,600,000
Total goods available for sale
Less Inventory, June 30, 2006
4,100,000
700,000
Cost of goods sold P3,400,000
The beginning and ending inventories of the year were ascertained thru physical count except that
no reconciling items were considered. Even though the books have been closed, your working paper
trial balance show all account with activity during the year. All purchases are FOB shipping point.
The company is on a periodic inventory basis.
In your examination of inventory cut-offs at the beginning and end of the year, you took note of the
following:
July 1, 2005
a. June invoices totaling to P130,000 were entered in the voucher register in June. The
corresponding goods not received until July.
b. Invoices totaling P54,000 were entered in the voucher register in July but the goods received during June.
June 30, 2006
c. Invoices with an aggregate value of P186,000 were entered in the voucher register in July, and
the goods were received in July. The invoices, however, were date June.
d. June invoices totaling P74,000 were entered in the voucher register in June but the goods were
not received until July.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
6
e. Invoices totaling P108,000 (the corresponding goods for which were received in June) were
entered the voucher register, July.
f. Sales on account in the total amount of P176,000 were made on June 30 and the goods
delivered at that time. Book entries relating to the sales were made in June.
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your cut-off tests, answer the following:
1. How much is the adjusted Inventory as of July 1, 2005?
a. P500,000 c. P576,000
b. P630,000 d. P370,000
2. How much is the adjusted Purchases for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006?
a. P3,840,000 c. P3,894,000
b. P3,600,000 d. P3,914,000
3. How much is the adjusted Inventory as of June 30, 2006?
a. P784,000 c. P892,000
b. P500,000 d. P960,000
4. How much is the adjusted Cost of Goods Sold for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006?
a. P3,316,000 c. P3,510,000
b. P3,970,000 d. P3,564,000
5. The necessary compound adjusting journal entry as of June 30, 2006 would include a net
adjustment to Retained Earnings of
a. P130,000 c. P76,000
b. P184,000 d. P54,000
Suggested Solution:
Questions No. 1 to 3
Inventory
7/1/05
Purchases
Inventory
6/30/06
Unadjusted balances P500,000 P3,600,000 P700,000
Add (deduct) adj.:
Item a 130,000 - - Item b - (54,000) -
Item c - 186,000 186,000
Item d - - 74,000
Item e - -
Item f - 108,000 -
Net adjustments 130,000 240,000 260,000
Adjusted balances P630,000 P3,840,000 P960,000
Question No. 4
Inventory, July 1, 2005 P 630,000
Add Purchases 3,840,000 Total goods available for sale 4,470,000
Less Inventory, June 30, 2006 960,000
Cost of goods sold P3,510,000
Question No. 5
Compound adjusting entry:
Inventory, 7/1/05 P130,000
Purchases 240,000
Inventory, 6/30/06 260,000
Retained earnings (P130,000 - P54,000) P76,000
Vouchers payable (P186,000 + P108,000) 294,000
Cost of sales 260,000
Answers: 1) B; 2) A; 3) D; 4) C, 5) C
PROBLEM NO. 6
The following accounts were included in the unadjusted trial balance of Bani Company as of
December 31, 2006:
Cash P 481,600
Accounts receivable 1,127,000
Inventory 3,025,000
Accounts payable 2,100,500
Accrued expenses 215,500
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
7
During your audit, you noted that Bani held its cash books open after year-end. In addition, your
audit revealed the following:
1. Receipts for January 2007 of P327,300 were recorded in the December 2006 cash receipts book.
The receipts of P180,050 represent cash sales and P147,250 represent collections from
customers, net of 5% cash discounts.
2. Accounts payable of P186,200 was paid in January 2007. The payments, on which discounts of
P6,200 were taken, were included in the December 2006 check register.
3. Merchandise inventory is valued at P3,025,000 prior to any adjustments. The following
information has been found relating to certain inventory transactions.
a. Goods valued at P137,500 are on consignment with a customer. These goods are not
included in the inventory figure.
b. Goods costing P108,750 were received from a vendor on January 4, 2007. The related
invoice was received and recorded on January 6, 2007. The goods were shipped on
December 31, 2006, terms FOB shipping point.
c. Goods costing P318,750 were shipped on December 31, 2006, and were delivered to the
customer on January 3, 2007. The terms of the invoice were FOB shipping point. The
goods were included in the 2006 ending inventory even though the sale was recorded in
2006.
d. A P91,000 shipment of goods to a customer on December 30, terms FOB destination are not included in the year-end inventory. The goods cost P65,000 and were delivered to the
customer on January 3, 2007. The sale was properly recorded in 2007.
e. The invoice for goods costing P87,500 was received and recorded as a purchase on
December 31, 2006. The related goods, shipped FOB destination were received on January
4, 2007, and thus were not included in the physical inventory.
f. Goods valued at P306,400 are on consignment from a vendor. These goods are not included
in the physical inventory.
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, determine the adjusted balances of the following as of December 31, 2006:
1. Cash
a. P481,600 c. P334,300
b. P340,500 d. P346,700
2. Accounts receivable
a. P1,454,300 c. P1,127,000
b. P1,282,000 d. P1,274,250
3. Inventory
a. P3,017,500 c. P2,930,000
b. P3,040,000 d. P2,505,000
4. Accounts payable
a. P2,395,450 c. P2,286,500
b. P2,307,950 d. P2,301,750
5. Current ratio
a. P2.00 c. P1.84
b. P1.83 d. P2.01
Suggested Solution:
Questions No. 1 to 4
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventory
Accounts Payable
Unadjusted balances P481,600 P1,127,000 P3,025,000 P2,100,500 Add (deduct):
AJE No. 1 (327,300) 155,000 - - AJE No. 2 180,000 - - 186,200 AJE No. 3.a - - 137,500 -
AJE No. 3.b - - 108,750 108,750 AJE No. 3.c - - (318,750) - AJE No. 3.d - - 65,000 - AJE No. 3.e - - - (87,500)
Adjusted balances P334,300 P1,282,000 P3,017,500 P2,307,950
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
8
Adjusting entries:
1) Accounts receivable (P147,250/.95) P155,000
Sales 180,050
Cash P327,300
Sales discount (P147,250/.95 x .05) 7,750
2) Cash P180,000
Purchase discount 6,200 Accounts payable P186,200
3.a) Inventory P137,500
Cost of sales P137,500
3.b) Inventory P108,750
Accounts payable P108,750
3.c) Cost of sales P318,750
Inventory P318,750
3.d) Inventory P 65,000 Cost of sales P 65,000
3.e) Accounts payable P 87,500
Cost of sales P 87,500
3.f) No adjusting entry
Question No. 5
Current assets
Cash P 334,300
Accounts receivable 1,282,000
Inventory 3,017,500 P4,633,800
Divide by current liabilities
Accounts payable 2,307,950
Accrued expenses 215,500 2,523,450
Current ratio 1.84
Answers: 1) C; 2) B; 3) A; 4) B, 5) C
PROBLEM NO. 7
The Bolinao Company values its inventory at the lower of FIFO cost or net realizable value (NRV). The inventory accounts at December 31, 2005, had the following balances.
Raw materials P 650,000
Work in process 1,200,000
Finished goods 1,640,000
The following are some of the transactions that affected the inventory of the Bolinao Company
during 2006.
Jan. 8 Bolinao purchased raw materials with a list price of P200,000
and was given a trade discount of 20% and 10%; terms 2/15,
n/30. Bolinao values inventory at the net invoice price
Feb. 14 Bolinao repossessed an inventory item from a customer who
was overdue in making payment. The unpaid balance on the
sale is P15,200. The repossessed merchandise is to be
refinished and placed on sale. It is expected that the item can
be sold for P24,000 after estimated refinishing costs of P6,800.
The normal profit for this item is considered to be P3,200.
Mar. 1 Refinishing costs of P6,400 were incurred on the repossessed
item.
Apr. 3 The repossessed item was resold for P24,000 on account, 20%
down.
Aug. 30 A sale on account was made of finished goods that have a list
price of P59,200 and a cost P38,400. A reduction of P8,000
off the list price was granted as a trade-in allowance. The
trade-in item is to be priced to sell at P6,400 as is. The
normal profit on this type of inventory is 25% of the sales
price.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
9
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, answer the following: (Assume the client is using perpetual inventory system)
1. The entry on Jan. 8 will include a debit to Raw Materials Inventory of
a. P200,000 c. P141,120 b. P144,000 d. P196,000
2. The repossessed inventory on Feb. 14 is most likely to be valued at
a. P14,000 c. P17,200
b. P24,000 d. P14,400
3. The journal entries on April 3 will include a
a. Debit to Cash of P24,000.
b. Debit to Cost of Repossessed Goods Sold of P14,000.
c. Credit to Profit on Sale of Repossessed Inventory of P3,600.
d. Credit to Repossessed Inventory of P20,400.
4. The trade-in inventory on Aug. 30 is most likely to be valued at a. P8,000 c. P6,000
b. P4,800 d. P6,400
5. How much will be recorded as Sales on Aug. 30?
a. P51,200 c. P57,200
b. P56,000 d. P57,600
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
Amount to be debited to Raw Materials Inventory
(P200,000 x .8 x .9 x .98)
P141,120
Question No. 2
Estimated selling price P24,000
Less refinishing costs 6,800
Net realizable value 17,200
Less normal profit 3,200
Valuation of repossessed inventory P14,000
Repossessed inventory is valued at fair value or best possible approximation of fair value. Since fair value of the item is not given, the item was valued at net realizable value less the normal profit. Incidentally, this is the valuation of trade-in inventory.
Question No. 3
Journal entries on April 3, 2006:
Cash (P24,000 x 20%) P 4,800
Accounts receivable (P24,000 – P4,800) 19,200
Sales – Repossessed inventory P24,000
Cost of Repossessed Goods Sold (P14,000+P6,400) P20,400
Repossessed Inventory P20,400
Question No. 4
Estimated selling price (net realizable value) P6,400
Less normal profit (P6,400 x 25%) 1,600
Valuation of trade-in inventory P4,800
Question No. 5
Accounts receivable (P59,200 - P8,000) P51,200
Trade-in inventory (see no. 4) 4,800
Amount to be recorded as sales P56,000
Answers: 1) C; 2) A; 3) D; 4) B, 5) B
PROBLEM NO. 8
Calasiao Construction Corporation engaged you to advise it regarding the proper accounting for a series of long-term contracts. Calasiao commenced doing business on January 2, 2006.
Construction activities for the first year of operations are shown below. All contract costs are with
different customers, and any work remaining at December 31, 2006, is expected to be completed in
2007.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
10
Project
Total Contract
Price
Billings Through
12/31/06
Collections Through
12/31/06
Contract Costs
Incurred Through
12/31/06
Estimated Additional Costs to Complete
A P1,200,000 P 800,000 P 720,000 P 992,000 P 268,000
B 1,400,000 440,000 420,000 271,200 1,084,800
C 1,120,000 1,120,000 1,020,000 744,000 - D 800,000 140,000 100,000 492,000 348,000 E 960,000 820,000 800,000 740,000 60,000 P5,420,000 P3,320,000 P3,060,000 P3,239,200 P1,760,800
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your engagement, determine the following using the
percentage-of-completion method:
1. Net realized gross profit for the year 2006
a. P462,133 c. P1,149,419
b. P432,800 d. P 276,000
2. Balance of Construction in Progress account as of December 31, 2006
a. P2,552,000 c. P3,268,619
b. P2,581,333 d. P2,395,200
3. Amount to be reported in the current assets section of the balance sheet as Inventories as of
December 31, 2006 a. P541,333 c. P352,000
b. P512,000 d. P444,000
4. Amount to be reported in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet as of December 31,
2006
a. P 56,960 c. P160,000
b. P248,800 d. P 0
5. Net realized gross profit for the year 2006 assuming the company used the completed-contract
method
a. P432,800 c. P376,000
b. P436,000 d. P276,000
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
Project
Estimated
gross
profit (loss)*
Percentage of
completion**
Realized gross
profit (loss)
A (P60,000) not applicable (P60,000)
B 44,000 20.00% 8,800
C 376,000 100.00% 376,000
D (40,000) not applicable (40,000)
E 160,000 92.50% 148,000
Total P432,800
* (Total contract price - Total estimated costs) ** (Costs incurred through Dec. 31, 2006 / Total estimated costs)
Question No. 2
Project
Costs incurred
through
12/31/06
Realized gross
profit (loss)
Construction
in Progress
A P992,000 (P60,000) P 932,000
B 271,200 8,800 280,000
D 492,000 (40,000) 452,000
E 740,000 148,000 888,000
Total P2,552,000
Question No. 3
Project
Construction in Progress
Progress Billings
Net
A P 932,000 P 800,000 P132,000
D 452,000 140,000 312,000
E 888,000 820,000 68,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
11
Project
Construction
in Progress
Progress
Billings
Net
Total P2,272,000 P1,760,000 P512,000
Question No. 4
Progress billings in excess of costs and recognized profit – Project B (P440,000 - P280,000) P160,000
Question No. 5
Project
Realized gross
profit (loss)
A (P60,000)
B – not yet completed -
C 376,000
D – not yet completed -
E (40,000)
P276,000
Answers: 1) B; 2) A; 3) B; 4) C, 5) D
PROBLEM NO. 9
Dasol Factory started operations in 2006. Dasol manufactures bath towels. 60% of the production
are “Class A” which sell for P500 per dozen and 40% are “Class B” which sell for P250 per dozen.
During 2006, 6,000 dozens were produced at an average cost of P360 per dozen. The inventory at
the end of the year was as follows:
220 dozens “Class A” @ P360 P 79,200
300 dozens “Class B” @ P360 108,000
P187,200
QUESTIONS:
Using the relative sales value method, which management considers as a more equitable basis of
cost distribution, answer the following:
1. How much of the total cost should be allocated to “Class A”?
a. P1,296,000 c. P1,284,324
b. P1,620,000 d. P 925,714
2. How much of the total cost should be allocated to “Class B”?
a. P540,000 c. P 864,000
b. P875,676 d. P1,234,286
3. How much is the value of inventory as of December 31, 2006?
a. P187,200 c. P117,000
b. P187,946 d. P166,500
4. How much is the cost of sales for the year 2006?
a. P1,972,800 c. P2,043,000
b. P1,993,500 d. P1,972,054
5. How much is the gross profit for the year 2006?
a. P242,200 c. P221,500
b. P406,500 d. P242,946
Suggested Solution:
Questions No. 1 & 2
Total cost of production (6,000 dozens x P360)
P2,160,000
Divide by total sales price:
Class A (6,000 x 60% = 3,600 x P500) P1,800,000
Class B (6,000 x 40% = 2,400 x P250) 600,000 2,400,000
Cost ratio 90%
Class A (P1,800,000 x 90%) P1,620,000
Class B (P600,000 x 90%) P540,000
Alternative computation:
Class A (P2,160,000 x 18/24) P1,620,000
Class B (P2,160,000 x 6/24) P540,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
12
Question No. 3
Class A (220 x P500 x 90%) P 99,000
Class B (300 x P250 x 90%) 67,500
Inventory, 12/31/06 P166,500
Question No. 4
Total cost of production (6,000 dozens x P360) P2,160,000
Less inventory, 12/31/06 166,500
Cost of sales P1,993,500
Question No. 5
Sales of Class A [(3,600 - 220) x P500] P1,690,000
Sales of Class B [(2,400 - 300) x P250] 525,000
Total sales 2,215,000
Less cost of sales 1,993,500
Gross profit P 221,500
Answers: 1) B; 2) A; 3) D; 4) B, 5) C
PROBLEM NO. 10
During your audit of the records of the Manaoag Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006,
the following facts were disclosed:
Raw materials inventory, 1/1/2006 P 720,200
Raw materials purchases 5,232,800
Direct labor 4,900,000
Manufacturing overhead applied (150% of direct labor) 7,350,000
Finished goods inventory, 1/1/2006 1,240,000
Selling expenses 8,112,800
Administrative expenses 7,377,200
Your examination disclosed the following additional information:
a) Purchases of raw materials
Month Units Unit Price Amount January – February 55,000 P17.76 P 976,800
March – April 45,000 20.00 900,000
May – June 25,000 19.60 490,000
July – August 35,000 20.00 700,000
September – October 45,000 20.40 918,000
November – December 60,000 20.80 1,248,000
265,000 P5,232,800
b) Data with respect to quantities are as follows:
Explanation
Units
1/1/06 12/31/06
Raw materials 35,000 ? Work in process (80% completed) - 25,000
Finished goods 15,000 40,000
Sales, 200,000 units
c) Raw materials are issued at the beginning of the manufacturing process. During the year, no
returns, spoilage, or wastage occurred. Each unit of finished goods contains one unit of raw
materials.
d) Inventories are stated at cost as follows:
Raw materials – according to the FIFO method
Direct labor – at an average rate determined by correlating total direct labor cost with
effective production during the period
Manufacturing overhead – at an applied rate of 150% of direct labor cost
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, answer the following:
1. The raw materials inventory as of December 31, 2006 is
a. P992,000 c. P 936,000
b. P888,000 d. P1,040,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
13
2. The work in process inventory as of December 31, 2006 is
a. P1,496,000 c. P1,746,000
b. P1,514,000 d. P1,776,000
3. The finished goods inventory as of December 31, 2006 is
a. P2,793,600 c. P3,553,130 b. P3,334,000 d. P2,812,000
4. The cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2006 is
a. P16,897,000 c. P14,077,000
b. P14,161,400 d. P13,911,400
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
Units
Raw materials, 1/1/06 35,000
Add Purchases 265,000 Raw materials available for use 300,000
Less raw materials, 12/31/06 (squeeze) 50,000
Goods placed in process 250,000
Less work-in-process, 12/31/06 25,000
Goods manufactured 225,000
Finished goods, 1/1/06 15,000
Total goods available for sale 240,000
Less finished goods, 12/31/06 40,000
Goods sold 200,000
Raw materials, 12/31/06 (50,000 units x P20.80) P1,040,000
Question No. 2
Raw materials [(10,000 units x P20.80) +
(15,000 units x P20.40)]
P 514,000
Direct labor (25,000 units x 80% x P20a) 400,000
Factory overhead (25,000 units x 80% x P30b) 600,000
Work in process, 12/31/06 P1,514,000
Labor unit cost (P4,900,000/245,000* units) P20a
Overhead unit cost (P7,350,000/245,000* units) P30b
*Equivalent production for labor and overhead
Started, finished and sold [(200,000 units - 15,000
units) x 100%]
185,000 Started, finished and on hand (40,000 units x 100%) 40,000
Started, and in process (25,000 units x 80%) 20,000
Total 245,000
Question No. 3
Raw materials [(30,000 units x P20.40)
+(10,000 units x P20)]
P 812,000
Direct labor (40,000 units x P20a) 800,000
Factory overhead (40,000 units x P30b) 1,200,000
Finished goods inventory, 12/31/06 P2,812,000
Question No. 4
Raw materials, 1/1/06 P 720,200
Add purchases 5,232,800
Raw materials available for use 5,953,000
Less raw materials, 12/31/06 (see no. 1) 1,040,000
Direct materials used 4,913,000
Direct labor 4,900,000
Factory overhead 7,350,000
Total manufacturing cost 17,163,000
Add work-in-process, 1/1/06 -
Total cost placed in process 17,163,000
Less work-in-process, 12/31/06 (see no. 2) 1,514,000
Cost of goods manufactured 15,649,000
Add finished goods, 1/1/06 1,240,000 Total goods available for sale 16,889,000
Less finished goods, 12/31/06 (see no. 3) 2,812,000
Cost of goods sold P14,077,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
14
Answers: 1) D; 2) B; 3) D; 4) C
PROBLEM NO. 11
The Mangaldan Merchandising Company is a leading distributor of kitchen wares. The company
uses the first-in, first-out method of calculating the cost of goods sold. The following information
concerning two of the company’s products is taken from the month of May:
PANS KETTLES No. of
units
Unit
cost
No. of
units
Unit
cost
May 1, beginning inventory 10,000 P 60 6,000 P 40
Purchases:
May 15 14,000 65 9,000 P 42
May 25 6,000 75
Sales for the month 20,000
(@ P80)
10,000
(@ P44)
On May 31, Mangaldan’s suppliers reduced their price from the last purchase price by the following
percentages:
Pans…………………..25% Kettles…………………20%
Accordingly, the company agreed to reduce selling prices by 15% on all items beginning June 1.
Mangaldan Merchandising Company’s selling costs are calculated at 10% of selling price. Both
products have a normal profit of 30% on sales prices (after selling costs).
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, answer the following:
1. Total cost of Pans as of May 31 is
a. P710,000 c. P600,000 b. P653,300 d. P612,000
2. Total cost of Kettles as of May 31 is
a. P210,000 c. P200,000
b. P206,000 d. P168,300
3. The inventory at May 31 should be valued at
a. P768,300 c. P920,000
b. P780,300 d. P890,000
4. The loss on inventory write down for the month of May is
a. P139,700 c. P29,300
b. P137,300 d. P27,600
5. The cost of sales, before loss on inventory write down, for the month of May is
a. P1,778,000 c. P1,797,700
b. P1,685,600 d. P1,658,000
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
4,000 units @ P65 P260,000
6,000 units @ P75 450,000
Total cost of Pans P710,000
Question No. 2
Total cost of Kettles (5,000 units @ P42) P210,000
Question No. 3
Item
Units
Unit Cost
NRV*
Inventory
Amount**
Pans 4,000 P65 P61.20 P244,800
6,000 75 61.20 367,200
Kettles 5,000 42 33.66 168,300
P780,300
* Estimated selling price – Estimated cost to sell ** Lower of cost or NRV
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
15
Question No. 4
Total cost of inventory (P710,000 + P210,000) P920,000
Less inventory value (see no. 3) 780,300
Required allowance for inventory writedown 139,700
Less allowance, May 1 (6,000 x P0.40) 2,400
Loss on inventory writedown for May P137,300
Question No. 5
Pans:
10,000 units @ P60 P600,000
10,000 units @ P65 650,000 P1,250,000
Kettles:
6,000 units @ P40 240,000
4,000 units @ P42 168,000 408,000
Total cost of sales P1,658,000
Alternative computation: Inventory, 5/1:
Pans (10,000 units x P60) P600,000
Kettles (6,000 units x P40) 240,000 P 840,000
Add purchases:
Pans [(14,000 units x P65) +
(6,000 x P75)]
1,360,000
Kettles (9,000 units x P42) 378,000 1,738,000
Total goods available for sale 2,578,000
Less inventory, 5/31 (at cost) 920,000
Cost of sales, before inventory
writedown
P1,658,000
Answers: 1) A; 2) A; 3) B; 4) B, 5) D
PROBLEM NO. 12
In conducting your audit of Mangatarem Corporation, a company engaged in import and wholesale
business, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, you determined that its internal control system
was good. Accordingly, you observed the physical inventory at an interim date, May 31, 2006
instead of at June 30, 2006.
You obtained the following information from the company’s general ledger.
Sales for eleven months ended May 31, 2006 P1,344,000
Sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 1,536,000
Purchases for eleven months ended May 31, 2006
(before audit adjustments)
1,080,000
Purchases for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 1,280,000
Inventory, July 1, 2005 140,000
Physical inventory, May 31, 2006 220,000
Your audit disclosed the following additional information.
(1) Shipments costing P12,000 were received in May and included in the physical inventory but
recorded as June purchases.
(2) Deposit of P4,000 made with vendor and charged to purchases in April 2006. Product was
shipped in July 2006.
(3) A shipment in June was damaged through the carelessness of the receiving department. This
shipment was later sold in June at its cost of P16,000.
QUESTIONS:
In audit engagements in which interim physical inventories are observed, a frequently used auditing
procedure is to test the reasonableness of the year-end inventory by the application of gross profit
ratio. Based on the above and the result of your audit, you are to provide the answers to the
following:
1. The gross profit ratio for eleven months ended May 31, 2006 is
a. 20% c. 30%
b. 35% d. 25%
2. The cost of goods sold during the month of June, 2006 using the gross profit ratio method is
a. P132,000 c. P148,000
b. P144,000 d. P160,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
16
3. The June 30, 2006 inventory using the gross profit method is
a. P264,000 c. P268,000
b. P340,000 d. P260,000
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
Sales for 11 months
ended 5/31/06
P1,344,000
Less cost of sales for 11
months ended 5/31/06:
Inventory, July 1, 2005 P 140,000
Add adjusted purchases:
Unadjusted P1,080,000
Item no. 1 12,000
Item no. 2 (4,000) 1,088,000 Goods available for sale 1,228,000
Less inventory, 5/31/06 220,000 1,008,000
Gross profit 336,000
Divide by sales for 11 months
ended 5/31/06
1,344,000
Gross profit rate for 11
months ended 5/31/06
25%
Question No. 2
Sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 P1,536,000
Less sales for 11 months ended May 31, 2006 1,344,000
Sales for June, 2006 192,000 Less sales without profit 16,000
Sales with profit 176,000
Multiply by cost ratio (100% - 25%) 75%
Cost of sales with profit 132,0000
Add cost of sales without profit 16,000
Total cost of sales for June, 2006 P 148,000
Question No. 3
Inventory, 7/1/05 P 140,000
Add adjusted purchases:
Unadjusted P1,280,000
Item no. 2 (4,000) 1,276,000
Total goods available for sale 1,416,000
Less cost of sales:
Sales without profit 16,000
Sales with profit [(P1,536,000 - P16,000) x 75%]
1,140,000
1,156,000
Inventory, 6/30/06 P 260,000
Answers: 1) D; 2) C; 3) D
PROBLEM NO. 13
On March 31, 2006 San Fabian Company had a fire which completely destroyed the factory building
and inventory of goods in process; some of the equipment was saved.
After the fire, a physical inventory was taken. The material was valued at P750,000 and the
finished goods at P620,000.
The inventories on January 1, 2006 consisted of:
Materials P 310,000
Goods in process 1,215,000
Finished goods 1,700,000
Total P3,225,000
A review of the accounting records disclosed that the sales and gross profit on sales for the last
three years were:
Sales Gross profit
2003 P8,000,000 P2,400,000
2004 7,600,000 2,215,000
2005 5,000,000 1,776,000
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
17
The sales for the first three months of 2006 were P3,000,000. Material purchases were P1,250,000,
transportation on purchases was P100,000 and direct labor cost for the three months was
P1,000,000. For the past two years, factory overhead cost has been 80% of direct labor cost.
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, compute the following:
1. The most likely gross profit rate to be used in estimating the inventory of goods in process
destroyed by fire
a. 31.55% c. 35.52%
b. 32.76% d. 36.00%
2. Total cost of goods placed in process
a. P2,710,000 c. P3,925,000
b. P973,500 d. P4,375,000
3. Total cost of goods manufactured
a. P3,133,500 c. P 854,400 b. P 973,500 d. P3,014,400
4. Inventory of goods in process lost
a. P 791,500 c. P 119,100
b. P1,360,600 d. P2,951,500
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
2003 2004 2005
Gross profit P2,400,000 P2,215,000 P1,776,000
Divide by Sales P8,000,000 P7,600,000 P5,000,000
Gross profit rate 30.00% 29.14% 35.52%
Average gross profit rate 31.55%
Questions No. 2 to 4
Raw materials, 1/1/06 P 310,000
Purchases 1,250,000
Freight-in 100,000
Raw materials available for use 1,660,000
Raw materials, 3/31/06 (750,000)
Raw materials used 910,000
Direct labor 1,000,000
Factory overhead (P1,000,000 x 80%) 800,000
Total manufacturing cost 2,710,000
Work-in-process, 1/1/06 1,215,000
Total cost placed in process 3,925,000 (2)
Less work-in-process, 3/31/06 (squeeze) (2,951,500) (4)
Cost of goods manufactured 973,500 (3)
Finished goods, 1/1/06 1,700,000
Total goods available for sale 2,673,500
Less finished goods, 3/31/06 (620,000)
Cost of goods sold (P3,000,000 x 68.45%) P2,053,500
Answers: 1) A; 2) C; 3) B; 4) D
PROBLEM NO. 14
You obtained the following information in connection with your audit of Villasis Corporation:
Cost Retail
Beginning inventory P1,987,200 P2,760,000
Sales 7,812,000
Purchases 4,688,640 6,512,000
Freight in 94,560
Mark ups 720,000
Mark up cancellations 120,000
Markdown 240,000 Markdown cancellations 40,000
Villasis Corp. uses the retail inventory method in estimating the values of its inventories and costs.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
18
QUESTIONS:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, answer the following:
1. The cost ratio to be used considering the provisions of PAS 2 is
a. 68.58% c. 70.00%
b. 69.20% d. 75.78%
2. The estimated ending inventory at retail is
a. P2,300,000 c. P1,940,000
b. P2,060,000 d. P1,860,000
3. The estimated ending inventory at cost is
a. P1,412,786 c. P1,302,000
b. P1,275,588 d. P1,287,120
4. The estimated cost of goods sold is
a. P5,468,400 c. P5,357,614
b. P5,494,812 d. P4,685,117
Suggested Solution:
Question No. 1
Cost Retail
Beginning inventory P1,987,200 P2,760,000
Purchases 4,688,640 6,512,000
Freight in 94,560
Net mark up (P720,000 - P120,000) 720,000
Net mark down (P240,000 - P40,000) ___________ 120,000
Goods available for sale P6,770,400 P9,672,000
Cost ratio (P6,770,400/P9,672,000) 70%
PAS 2 par. 22 states that the retail inventory method is often used in the retail industry for measuring inventories of large numbers of rapidly changing items with similar margins for which it is impracticable to use other costing methods. The cost of inventory is determined by reducing the sales value of the inventory by the appropriate percentage gross margin. The percentage used takes into consideration inventory that has been marked down to below its original selling price. An average percentage for each retail department is often used.
Previously, the conventional approach (lower of average cost or market valuation) is often used if the problem is silent. The conventional approach ignores markdown in the computation of cost ratio. However, since PAS 2 specifically states that the percentage should take into consideration inventory that has been marked down to below its original selling price, the cost ratio was computed using the average method.
Question No. 2
Goods available for sale at retail P9,672,000
Less sales 7,812,000
Ending inventory, at retail P1,860,000
Question No. 3
Ending inventory, at cost (P1,860,000 x 70%) P1,302,000
Question No. 4
Goods available for sale at cost P6,770,400
Less ending inventory, at cost 1,302,000
Estimated cost of sales P5,468,400
Answers: 1) C; 2) D; 3) C; 4) A
PROBLEM NO. 15
Select the best answer for each of the following:
1. Otso Manufacturing Corporation mass produces eight different products. The controller, who is
interested in strengthening internal controls over the accounting for materials used in
production, would be most likely to implement
a. A separation of duties among production personnel.
b. A perpetual inventory system.
c. An economic order quantity (EOQ) system.
d. A job order cost accounting system.
CEBU CPAR CENTER, INC. www.Cebu-CPAR.com
19
2. Which of the following control procedures would most likely be used to maintain accurate
perpetual inventory records?
a. Independent matching of purchase orders, receiving reports, and vendors' invoices.
b. Independent storeroom count of goods received.
c. Periodic independent reconciliation of control and subsidiary records.
d. Periodic independent comparison of records with goods on hand.
3. The accuracy of perpetual inventory records may be established in part by comparing perpetual
inventory records with
a. Purchase requisitions. c. Receiving reports.
b. Purchase orders. d. Vendor payments.
4. The auditor tests the quantity of materials charged to work in process by tracing these
quantities to
a. Receiving reports. c. Materials requisition forms.
b. Perpetual inventory records. d. Cost ledgers.
5. An auditor would analyze inventory turnover rates to obtain evidence concerning management’s
assertion about
a. Valuation or allocation. c. Presentation and disclosure.
b. Rights and obligations. d. Completeness
6. In auditing inventories, a major objective relates to the existence assertion. Of the following
audit procedures relating to inventories, which does not support the existence assertion?
a. The auditor reviews the client's inventory-taking instructions for such matters as proper
arrangement of goods, separation of consigned goods, and limits on movements of goods
during inventory.
b. The auditor observes the client's inventory and performs test counts as appropriate.
c. The auditor confirms inventories not on the premises. d. The auditor performs a lower of cost or market test for major categories of inventory.
7. In a manufacturing company, which one of the following audit procedures would give the least
assurance of the valuation of inventory at the audit date?
a. Obtaining confirmation of inventories pledged under loan agreements. b. Testing the computation of standard overhead rates.
c. Examining paid vendors' invoices.
d. Reviewing direct labor rates.
8. When auditing merchandise inventory at year end, the auditor performs a purchase cutoff test
to obtain evidence that
a. No goods held on consignment for customers are included in the inventory balance.
b. No goods observed during the physical count are pledged or sold.
c. All goods owned at year end are included in the inventory balance
d. All goods purchased before year end are received before the physical inventory count.
9. Which of the following items should not be included in a physical inventory?
a. Materials in transit from vendors.
b. Goods in a private warehouse.
c. Goods received for repairs under warranty.
d. Consignment to an agent.
10. You were engaged to conduct an annual examination for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.
Because of the expected holiday, you were able to convince your client to take a complete physical
inventory, in which you were present on October 15. Perpetual inventory records are kept and the
client considers a sale to be made in the period in which goods are shipped. You had a sales cut-
off test worksheet prepared. Which item among those listed below will not require an adjusting
entry to reconcile the client's detailed inventory record with the physical inventory?
a. b. c. d.
Date Goods Shipped Oct 31 Nov 2 Oct 14 Oct 10
Transaction Recorded as Sale Nov 2 Oct 31 Oct 16 Oct 19
Date Inventory Control Credited Oct 31 Oct 31 Oct 16 Oct 12
Answers: 1) B; 2) D; 3) C; 4) C, 5) A; 6) D; 7) A; 8) C; 9) C; 10) D