相対論的3体散乱計算Relativistic Faddeev Scattering Calculations
P
N
核力に基づく核構造、核反応物理の展開
2017-03-27 — 2017-03-29
YITP・京都
N
H. Kamada (Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan)H. Witala , J. Golak, R. Skibinski
(Jagiellonian University, Poland)O. Shebeko , A. Arslanaliev(Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, NAS of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine)
§1 Motivation
The nonrelativistic theoretical prediction of the Nd scattering cross section beyond 200MeV/u is getting to be poor even including the 3-body force (FM type).
What is missing?
Phys. Rev. C 59, 3035 (1999)
Data
Only 2NF
Total cross section of the pd scattering
Phys. Rev. C 57, 2111 (1998)
§2 Relativistic Calculation
There are essentially two different approaches to relativistic three-nucleon calculation:
① a manifestly covariant scheme linked to a field theoretical approach.
② a scheme based on relativistic quantum mechanics on spacelike hypersurfaces (including the light front) in Minkowski space.
B. Bakamjian, L.H. Thomas,
Phys. Rev. 92, 1300 (1952).
• Within the second scheme the relativistic
Hamiltonian for on-the-mass-shell particles
consists of relativistic kinetic energies and
two- and many-body interactions including
their boost corrections, which are dictated
by the Poincare algebra.
What is the boost correction?
A potential in an arbitrary moving frame (q≠0) is
different, which enters a relativistic Lippmann-
Schwinger equation.
Vnr
Vnr
(q=0) (q=0)≠ (q≠0)
Two-body t-matrix
E - k’’2/m
)
nrnr
nrnr
^ ^
E)E)
Nonrelativistic LS eq.
Relativistic LS eq.
Boosted relativisitic LS eq.
Two-body t-matrix
E - k’’2/m
)
nrnr
nrnr
^ ^
E)E)
Nonrelativistic LS eq.
Relativistic LS eq.
Boosted relativisitic LS eq.
Two-body t-matrix
E - k’’2/m
)
nrnr
nrnr
^ ^
E)E)
Nonrelativistic LS eq.
Relativistic LS eq.
Boosted relativisitic LS eq.
Two-body t-matrix
)
^ ^
E - k’’2/m
nrnr
nrnr
E)E)
Nonrelativistic LS eq.
Relativistic LS eq.
Boosted relativisitic LS eq.
§3 Identification to therelativistic potential
Few-Body Syst. (2010) 48, 109
§3 Identification to therelativistic potential
: (pseudo) Relativistic potential
Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2457(1998)
“Scale-transform it from nonrelativity to relativity ”
Scale transformation
Type 1
Two-body t-matrix
E - k’’2/m
)
nrnr
nrnr
^ ^
E)E)
Nonrelativistic LS eq.
Relativistic LS eq.
Coester-Pieper-Serduke (CPS)
(PRC11, 1 (1975))
Type 2
nr
Sandwiching it between <k | and |k’>, we get
3
3
3
1( , ') 2 ( ) ( , ') 2 ( , ') ( ') ( , '') ( '', ') ''
4
1 1( ) ( ') ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') ''
2 4
namely,
1 1( , ') 2 ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') '' .
( ) ( ') 2
nr
nr
V k k k v k k v k k k v k k v k k d km
k k v k k v k k v k k d km m
v k k mV k k v k k v k k d kk k
Physics Letters B655, 119-125 (2007), (nucl-th/0703010)
(0)
( 1) ( ) ( ) 3
1( , ') 2 ( , '),
( ) ( ')
1 1( , ') 2 ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') ''
( ) ( ') 2
nr
n n n
nr
v k k mV k kk k
v k k mV k k v k k v k k d kk k
31 1( , ') 2 ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') '' .
( ) ( ') 2nrv k k mV k k v k k v k k d k
k k
Iteration Method
Convergence to the iteration
§4 Boost Correction
§4 Boost Correction
2 22 22 ( ) 2 ( ) qv k v q k q
Boosted Hamiltonian in 2N system
boosted
2 2 2 2 2 2
0ˆ( 4( ) ) 4( ) (2)qm k q v m k q
2 2 2 2 2 2 21 ˆ ˆ( 4( ) 4( ) ) (4)4
nr q q qV v m k q m k q v vm
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2
0
ˆ ˆ ˆ(4( ) 4( ) 4( ) )
4( ) (3)
q q qm k q v m k q m k q v v
m k q
2 22 ( ) 2 ( ) q k k q
31 1( , ') 2 ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') '' .
( ) ( ') 2
q nr q q
q q
v k k mV k k v k k v k k d kk k
31 1( , ') 2 ( , ') ( , '') ( '', ') '' .
( ) ( ') 2
nrv k k mV k k v k k v k k d k
k k
Non-boosted
Iteration method
Boosted
CD-Bonn potential
1S0 partial wave
E=350MeV
Half-shell t-matrix
Q=0 fm-1
Q=20 fm-1
Q=10 fm-1
Real Part
CD-Bonn potential
1S0 partial wave
E=350MeV
Half-shell t-matrix
Q=0 fm-1
Q=20 fm-1
Q=10 fm-1
Imaginary Part
Relativistic
potential?
Boost potential
Enter the relativistic
Faddeev equation
Identification Type 1 Identification Type 2
yes
no
Output :
Triton binding energy
Kharkov
ΧPT,AV18, CDBonn, Nijmegen etc
I. Dubovyk, O. Shebeko, Few-Body Sys. 48, 109 (2010).
Deuteron Wave Function
S-Wave
Solid:Kharkov
Dotted: CDBonn
Deuteron Wave Function
D-Wave
Solid:Kharkov
Dotted: CDBonn
§5 Triton binding energy
Type 1
Type 2 Coester-Pieper-Serduke (CPS)
Type 0 no identification
“Scale-transform it from nonrelativity to relativity ” (ST)
Rel. Nonrel.
Phys. Rev. C66, 044010 (2002) 5ch calculation
Triton binding energies (Type 1)
MeV
Triton binding energies (Type 2)
Rel. Nonrel.
-6.97-8.22-7.58-7.90-7.68-7.59
0.050.110.070.100.080.07
-7.02-8.33-7.65-8.00-7.76-7.66
5ch calculation EPJ Web of Conferences 3, 05025 (2010)
MeV
Triton binding energies (Type 0)
of Kharkov potential
5ch calculation
potential Relativistic Nonrelativistic Difference
Kharkov -7.42 (-7.49) 0.07
AV18 (-7.59) -7.66 0.07
CD-Bonn (-8.22) -8.33 0.11Type 2
Triton binding energies (Type2)
of N4LO
42ch calculation
regularization Relativistic Nonrelativistic Difference
R=0.9 -7.706 -7.832 0.126
R=1.0 -7.748 -7.867 0.119
R=1.1 -7.733 -7.848 0.115
CD-Bonn -8.150 -8.249 0.099
Kharkov -7.461 -7.528 0.067
N4LO pot. : E.Epelbaum et al.,Eur.Phys. J. A51, 53 (2015)
; E.Epelbaum et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 122301 (2015)
MeV
CD Bonn
DS [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
Ay [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
iT11 [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
T20 [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
T21 [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
T22 [CDBonn]
E=135MeV
Solid:Relativistic
Dashed: Nonrelativistic
Results (elastic nd scattering)
from Kharkov potential
• Nonrelativistic Interpretation (Type2)
DS
E=13MeV
Solid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
Ay
E=13MeV
Solid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
iT11
E=13MeV
Solid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
T20
E=13MeVSolid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
T21
E=13MeV
Solid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
T22
E=13MeV
Solid:CDBonn
Dashed:Kharkov
DS
E=135MeVSolid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
Ay
E=135MeV
Solid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
iT11
E=135MeV
Solid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
T20
E=135MeV
Solid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
T21
E=135MeV
Solid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
T22
E=135MeV
Solid:CDBonn[rel.]
Dashed:CDBonn[nonrel.]
Dotted:Kharkov
・Triton binding energies:
→ Chiral potentials (N4LO) give similar results
(-7.71~-7.73MeV) as CDBonn potential (-8.15MeV).
→ Kharkov potential needs not any identification and gives -7.46MeV.
→ Kharkov potential has a rather small difference between the relativistic binding energies and the nonrelativistic one.
§6 Summary and Outlook
・ Nd elastic scattering results:
→ In the low energy region (<65MeV) the prediction of Kharkov potential is reasonably agree with the CDBonn potential case.
→ Beyond the intermediate energy region (>65MeV) the prediction of Kharkov potential is getting to differ from the CDBonn potential case. However, it is difficult to distinguish if the difference causes from relativistic property or from its own parameterization.
§6 Summary and Outlook