Addendum A

A Lewkowlch Eng i neer! ng_ Aggociates Ltd.& environmental' materials testing

School District #68c/o Newcasde Engineedng Ltd.4 - 3179 Barons RoadNanaimo, BCv9T 5W5

Date: March5,201'3File Number P1,422"01.

1.

Attention: Mr. Scott Lewis, P.Eng.

PROJECT: CEDAR COMMUNITY SECONDARY SCHOOL - PI-AYING FIELD1640 MACMILLAN ROAD, NANATMO, BC

SUBJECT: PROPOSAI FEES FOR GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION SERVICES

Dear Mr. Ler.vis:

Inttoduction

Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. is pleased to provide this proposal of costs to

undertake a geotechnical investigation for the referenced site with respect to the proposed

playing f,reld improvements. The scope of our work and associated costs are oudined beiow,

and are based on prelimin ary infor:.rration ptovided by Newcasde Engineering Ltd.

Scope of Work

riTe understand the project consists of irnprovements to the existing playi-ng fie1ds to

irnprove drainage conditions.

Based on the information ptovided, we propose to advance a number of subsurface

explorations by means of a series of bore holes that would ptovide good general coverage of

the proposed improvem ent area (piaying f,relds). These subsurface explorations would be

advanced as deep as deemed necessary to provide information regarding the suitability of

subgrade soil conditions, depth to bedrock (if possible), settlemeot potential, seisrrric

considerations, the depth of the current water table (if possible), and well as the depth,

composition, and consistency of any f,ll materials, and comments on the suitability of said

fiIl materials for reuse as engineered fill.

'W'e recomrnend a drilling proglam in lieu of conventional test pitting. The excavation

equipment required to reach the depths typical of this type of investigation is large and

2.

a.

b.

SuiteA-2569 Kenworthr Road, Nanaimo, BC, CanadaVgT3M4fercphone: iZSOi 7S&O355 Fax: (250) 75&3831 www.lewkowich.co:n€--

client: School District #68 clo Newcastle Engineering Ltd.

Project: Cedar Communiw Secondary School - Playing pit16

File: PL422"01.

Date: March 5,201.3

Page: 2 of 4

extremely invasive. Test pits would result in large "soft" or disturbed areas within the

existing playing field. These areas would then require remediation at the time of

construcdon, increasing construction costs. lUso, the distutbed areas would tequire

remediation immediately followiog the field investigation which rvould increase the cost of

our investigation. Test pitting would result in signifi-cant sufface scarring and is not

recomrnended.

d. Senior field personnei would log the subsurface explorations using visual classification

methods. Following completion of the field investigation, a moderate amouflt of laboratory

testing for classification confrmation will be carried out, the scope of which is dependent on

the encountered conditions. \7e would then prepare a report that includes information as

outlined above, as well as soil logs detailing the subsurface conditiofls encountered.

e. LEA is prepared to complete this assignment in 3 to 5 weeks from notice to proceed; if a

specific timeline is required please speci$r. Please note, the quoted schedule is subject to the

availability of subcontractors.

f. The following quote is based on reasonable site access. If services quoted below are deemed

unrrecessary, or if unan1icipated services are tequired, costs wili be adiusted accordingly using

the attached schedule of fees.

A

Lew*towi e!: Eng i neeri ng Assoq Late?-Lt9!:

--

AClient:Project:File:Date:Page:

School District #68 clo New-castle Engineering Ltd'

Cedar Community Secondary School - Plaving Field

P1,422.01

N{arch 5,20133of4

Total CostTotal Hours/Units

$10,185.00Totai Proposal Costs (liot Including Taxes)

Senior Technician

/ TechnologistProject Start-uP & FieldReconnaissance

Drilling ContractorDrilling - FieldInvestigation

Senior Technician

/ TechnologistDrilhng - Fieldlnvestigation

DraftingTechnician

Soil Logs/Site Plan

Drafting

Senior Technician/ Techoologist

Geotechnical RePortPreparation

Geotechnical RePort

Review/Discussions

LaboratoryTechnician

Laboraton Soils

Analysis

ffisdonotinc1udethe1ocatingofonsiteundergroundser-vices/uti1itieswithintheworkarea (playing f,eld). If it o a.i"r-irr.a that locating th"e o., site utjliries ii r;ltit;,a, a lump sum fee of $500 for an

i,rd.plrra.rr.,.tjlity locating contractor wili be added to the above proposal costs'

xleetings and discussions for design and construction -*,'ould be extra at an hourlv rate shorvn on appended

schedule of fees.

Breakdown of Geotechnical Evaluation Costs

Key Personnel and Related Experience

The Project Manager for this project would be Mr. Steven Stacey, B'A', CTech, who has

ovef six years of expeliefice in the heids of civil and geotechnical engineering' The Engineer

for this assignment would be Mr. Chris Hudec, N{'A'Sc', P'E'ng' who has over ten years of

experience in rhe fleld oIgeotechnical engineering'

TEA has selved the Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands afea since 1'994 and has completed

or is currently involved with similar projects on Vaflcouver Island' including:

\IIj

I\+/i

3.

b.

Lewkowictr Engineering Assoeiates Ltd'

Client:Project:File:Date:Page:

School Disuict #68 c/o Newcasde Engineering Ltd'Cedar Community Secondary Schooi - Playing Field

P1.422.01

l\{arch 5,20134of4

4.

Merle Logan Artificial Playing Fields - Nanaimo, 2005 & 201'1'

Ladysmith Artificiai Plapng Field - Ladysmith,2010

Duncan Sports Field - Duncan, 2010

Comox Park Sports Field - Nanaimo,2010

Alberni District Secondary School - Port Albemi, 2009 to 2011

Valley Vierv Soccer Fields - Courtenay '2011

Fernwood School Playing Field - Saltspring Island, 2011

Closure

Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. appreciates the opportuoity to be of service on this

project. If you have any cornments, or if we can be of lurther assistance, please contact this

office at your convenience'

Respectfullv Submitted,Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.

Steven Stacey, B.A., CTechTechnician

tewkowlch Eng i neering Associate-s Llll -

-

+';.ia:=':i:=..:.::. :.=: ..:

:;: .\: :

'',=.8.,.'

-*a a'.

":! ra-i;,'+ '''' '

**

2013 Fees Schedule A

Description

PERSONNEL

Gerry F. Lewkowich, P'Eng.

Darron Clark, P.Eng.

Christopher Hudec, M'A.Sc., P'Eng

Paul Johnston, RIHT, lndustrial Hygienist

John Hessels, ASoT, Senior Technologist

Junior ProfessionalSenior TechnicianTechnicianJunior TechnicianSet of Building Schedules B and C

Overtime rates for hourly work may apply'

TESTING

Density Testing (nuclear densometer or volumetric)

Soil Moisture ContentSoil Classification and Description

Wash Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)

Dry Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)

Fines Content DeterminationAtterberg Limits (Plastic and Liquid)

HydrometerMoistu re-Density Relationshi p (Mod ified Proctor)

Moistu re-Density Relatlonshi p (Standard Proctor)

Concrete Testing (On Site: Air, Slump, Cylinders)

Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders (Client cast

or Lewkowich cast) or flexural strength of beams

Asphalt Testing (to include):- Oilextraction & Gradation- Brrquette DensitY- Marshall stabilitY and flow

- Void AnalYsis

Complete Marshall test including above

Asphalt / Concrete Coring - Calculate as follows:

(100mm dia X 50mm depth = 5000 coring mm) -

plus hourlY coring rate

Asphalt Core DensitiesOther tests (not listed) are performed at hourly rates'

DTSBURSEMENTS

Vehicle Kilometerage

(Note: Vehicle kilometerage rate is subject to change as

fuel costs vary)

All other disbursements at cost plus 10%

Prices are subiect to change without notice'

Rate Per ASTM Test Method

i 't',.1"1

It., ,!ti

rfi.

..y'') , "/.t ,l I

'.l*.l

- il' ! ". I- Y' v" i ,r-v|

l-,)- " i-.'l^'t.JI TL

1r" . L'" ,

nlt'

D2216

c1361C117c136c117

D431 8

D422D1557D698

CSA - p23.2

CSA - M3-2

D2172 I D5444D2726D1559D3203

D2726

Suite A, 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, B C VgT 3M4

Ph. 250-756-0355, F ax 250-7 56-3831

# 4 - 3179 BARONS ROAD, NANAIMO, B.C. VgT 5W5

PHONE: (250) 756-9553 FAX: (250) 756-9503

NEWCASTLEENGINEERING LTD.

s066-39CorresPondence

March 6,2013

School District 68 (Nanaimo - Ladysmith)

395 Wakesiah AvenueNanaimo, 8.C., VgR 3K6

Attention: Mr' Brent SPohn

Re: Cedar Secondary SchoolPlay Field Drainage Report - Fee Proposal

Dear Brent,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide a fee propog?llq the Topographic survey,

Preliminary Design and CosiEstimate for the playfield drainage problem at Cedar

Secondary School.

Our fee proposal is based telephone discussions with yourself and Steve Stacey of

Lewkowich fngineeiing Assoclates Ltd., on March 1,2013. We have separated the fee

pi"p"rrl into vlrious p-hr*"= of the project and identified our understanding of the scope

of work in each area.

A) Topographic SurveY

. Topographic Survey in area of existing piay fieid'

. Layout andlor pick up test hole locations.

. Download survey data and import into civil site plan'

e Obtain existing digitalfile of Cedar Secondary Schoolfrom School Disirict if available

. Update digital base Plan'

Part A Lump Sum $2,300.00

B) Preliminary Design OPtions

I Liaison with Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd, in regards to proposed test hole

investigation.

. Review Geotechnical Report provided by Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd'

. prepare preliminary design to eliminate field drainage problem.

. Forward options to School District.

. Attendance at meeting with school District staff to review design'

. Address School District comments'

Part B LumP Sum $3,500.00

C) Preliminary Cost Estimate

r prepare preliminary Cost Estimate for drainage works to School District for review'

r Address any inquires in regards to cost estimates'

Part G Lump Sum $1,000.00

D) Geotechnical lnvestigation and Report

. Attached is proposal Fees for Geotechnical Evaluation Services prepared by

Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.

Part D Estimated Fee ${0,185.00

Note, additional $500.00 for utility locate if required. Meetings and discussions for design

and construction would be extra at hourly rate'

Summary of our fee for the project is as follows:

Part A $2,300.00Part B $3,500.00Part C 1,000.00

Part D (Estimated Feil $'10,185.00

Project Total $16,985.00

Our Total Estimated Fee for the project is 16,985.00 plus HST'

lf you have any questions, or require any further information, please contract the

undersigned.

Yours truly,Newcastle Engineering Ltd'tu'Scott Lewis, P. Eng.

Addendum B

Donna Reimer

From:Subject:Attachments:

lmportance:

BS-05

Discovery Search MailboxFW: Cedar Secondary Site Drainage Assessment - Please proceed

P1422.0L Cedar Community Secondary School - Playing Field - Geotechnical....pdf; SD

68 Brent Spohn Cedar Secondary Fee Proposal March 6 20l3.pdf

High

From: Brent SpohnSent: Monday, January L3,20L4 1:00 PM

To: 'Scott Lewis'Cc: 'Bassem Tawfik (btawfik@kmbr.com)'; 'D. Gregg Brown (qbrown@kmbr'com)'; Pete Sabo

Subject: Cedar Secondary Site Drainage Assessment - Please proceed

Impoftance: High

HiScott,

As discussed during our teleconference minutes ago please proceed immediatelv per the attached.

Timelines are extremely tight. Please obtain an accelerated schedule from Lewkowich, develop the same for NEL and

forward as soon as possible.

It is critical that the District have sufficient information to allow the cost consultant to develop initial high level costing in

support of the budgeting process currently underway.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.

*r**t *"*+i:* i Fe*iliii*e Fi:+::!n; 5*p*:-';i=+r

=:r*-ii :5=-7+1-12i: i F=r ?5*-?4i"5?+: i **ri?C*-?'.3-i411

-1** V';*i.e*ia=.Ai,*r;i:+, il;nai..n=. =e -\.r:ifr 35i i ';'.+:;.s=.4S.*':,ca

A Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.geotechnical . health, safety & environmental'materials testing

Date: March5,2013File Number P1422.01

School District #68c/o Newcasde Engineering Ltd.4 - 31.79 Barons RoadNanaimo, BCv9T 5\75

2-

Attention: Mr. Scott Lewis, P.Eng.

PROJECT: CEDAR COMMUNITY SECONDARY SCHOOL - PI-AYING FIELD1640 MACMILLAN ROAD, NANAIMO, BC

SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FEES FOR GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION SERYICES

Dear Mr. Lewis:

a.

b.

Introduction

Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. is pleased to provide this proposal of costs to

undertake a geotechnical investigation for the referenced site with respect to the proposed

playing field improvements. The scope of our work and associated costs are outlined beIow,

and are based on preLrminary information provided by Newcasde Engineering Ltd.

Scope of Work

We understand the project consists of improvements to the existing piaying fie1ds to

improve drainage conditions.

Based on the information provided, we propose to advance a number of subsurface

explorations by means of a series of bore holes that would provide good general coverage of

the proposed improvemeflt ^rea

(playing fields). These subsurface exploradons would be

advanced as deep as deemed necessarT to provide information regarding the suitabiiity of

subgrade soil conditions, depth to bedrock (if possible), setdement potefldal, seismic

considerations, the depth of the current water table (if possible), and well as the depth,

composition, and consistency of any fill materials, and comrnents on the suitabiliry of said

ftlI materials for reuse as engineered fili.

We recommend a drilling program in iieu of conventional test pitting. The excavation

equipment required to reach the depths typical of this type of investigation is large and

Suite A - 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, BC, Canada VgT 3M4Telephone: (250) 75effi55 Fax (250) 756.3831 www.lewkowich.com

C.

Client:Project:File:Date:Page:

School District #68 c/o Newcastle Engineering Ltd.Cedar Communitv Secondary School - Playing FieidP1,422.07

March 5,20L32of4

extremely invasive. Test pits would result in large "soft" or disturbed areas within the

existing playing fieid. These areas would then require remediation at the time of

construction, increasing construction costs. Also, the distutbed areas would require

remediation immediately following the field invesdgation rvhich rvould increase the cost of

our investigation. Test pitting would result in significant surface scardng and is not

tecommended.

Senior field personnei would log the subsutface exploratiofls using visual classification

methods. Foliowing completion of the field investigation, a moderate amouflt of laboratory

testing for classification conft'mation will be carried out, the scope of which is dependent ofl

the encountered condidons. 'We would then prepare a report that includes ioformation as

outlined above, as well as soil logs detailing the subsutface conditions encountered.

LEA is prepared to complete this assignment in 3 to 5 weeks from notice to proceed; if a

specific timeline is required please specifir. Please riote, the quoted schedule is subject to the

availability of subcontractors.

The foilowing quote is based on reasonable site access. If services quoted below are deemed

unnecessary, or if unanticipated services are required, costs wil-l be adjusted accordingly using

the attached schedule of fees.

d.

e"

f.

Lewkowieh Engineerift g Associates Ltd.

Client:Project:File:Date:Page:

School District #68 clo Newcasde Engineering Ltd'Cedar Communiq, Secondary School - Plaving Field

P1.422.07

I\{arch 5,201.3

3of4

A

Total CostPersonnel

l*

[l,1' ;

Total Proposal Costs (llot Including Taxes) $10,18s.00

Project Start-up & FieldReconnaissance

Senior T'echoician

/ Technoiogist

Drilling Contractor

Senior Technician/ Technologist

Drilling - FieldInvestigation

DraftingTechnician

Soil Logs/Site PlanDrafting

Senior Technician

/ TechnologistGeotechnical ReportPreparation

Geotechnical ReportReview/Discussions

Laboraton'Technician

Laboratorr, SoilsAnalysis

Please nore, the above fees do not include the locating of on site underground services/utilities within the work

area (pla1.ing fie]d). If it is determined that locating the on site utilities is required, a lump sum lee of $500 for an

independent utiliry locating cofltractor wili be added to the above Pfoposal costs.

Nleetings and discussions for design and construction w-ould be extra at an houdv rate shown on appended

schedule of fees.

3.

Breakdown of Geotechnical Evaluation Costs

Key Personnel and Related Experience

The Project Manager for this project would be N{r. Steven Stace.Y, B.A', CTech, who has

o1.er six years of expelience rn the helds of civil and geotechnical engineering. The Engineer

for this assignmenr would be N{r. Chris Hudec, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. rvho has over terl l'ears of

experience in rhe Ileld oIgeolechnical engineering.

LEA has served the Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands area since 1994 and has completed

or is currenth, inr.'olved with similar pro]ects on Vancouver Islaad, including:

Lewkowi ch Eng i neerin g 4ssgg iates L-19.

----_

1-

Client:Project:File:Date:Page:

School District #68 c/o Newcastle Engineeling Ltd.Cedar Community Secondary School - Playing FieldP1,422.01

March 5,201.34of4

A

v.

vi.

vii.

i. Merle Logan Artificial Playing Fields - Nanaimo, 2005 & 2011,

ii. Ladysmith Artificial Plapng Field - Ladysmith,2010

in" Duncan Sports Field - Duncan, 2010

iv. Comox Park Sports Field - Nanaimo, 2010

Alberni District Secondary School * Port Alberni, 2009 to 2011

VaJley Vierr,' Soccer Fields - Courtenay,2011

Fernwood School Playing Field - Saltspring Islaad, 2011

Closure

Lewkowrch Engineering Associates Ltd. appreciates the oppoffunity to be of service ori this

project" If you have any comments, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact this

office at your convenience.

Respectlullv Submitted,Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.

4.

_o+F-****.1!nrrG+sg3*"=*

-----

,;Ei-sffi&-ryg.#fffiir@_iElb*p'." 'S;r'&-!- -r H tt.?*.+*f,Elri;hr'

*t**5-1-*'Steven Stacey, B.A., CTechTechnician

Lewkowleh Engineering Associates !-td.

:= l,:-:1.,:.,=- --' lE!:. :'i<:-=a,j.::a.::;=a::.;':,..;a!-;:::,r:

:E;,-,

ffi:,.9

' : =l:ii

; e.

,l=-::i;' :: ' '::i iaii':::i,ai:j:l ::. .

::;=:: ::r:-::i : li;

€r.€

iEH,s1*

'g}!i;6,4 ::.;lp-!.ii+t;i.. :

,-lr,

&'rlw:=:..::a:=

'..

1-q

*E--

ZAfi Fees Schedule A

Description

PERSONNEL

Gerry F. Lewkowich, P.Eng.

Darron Clark, P.Eng.Christopher Hudec, M.A.Sc., P.Eng

Paul Johnston, RIHT, lndustrial Hygienist

John Hessels, AScT, Senior Technologist

Junior ProfessionalSenior TechnicianTechnicianJunior TechnicianSet of Building Schedules B and COvertime rates for hourly work may apply.

TESTING

Density Testing (nuclear densometer or volumetric)

Soil Morsture ContentSoil Classification and DescriptionWash Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)

Dry Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)

Fines Content DeterminationAtterberg Limits (Plastic and Liquid)

HydrometerMoisture-Density Relationship (Modified Froctor)

Moistu re-Density Relationsh ip (Standard Proctor)Concrete Testing (On Site: Air, Slump, Cylinders)

Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders (Client cast

or Lewkowich cast) or flexural strength of beams

Asphalt Testing (to include):- Oilextraction & Gradation- Briquette Density- Marshall stability and flow- Void Analysis

Complete Marshall test including above

Asphalt / Concrete Coring - Calculate as follows:(100mm dia X 50mm depth = 5000 coring mm) -plus hourly coring rateAsphalt Core DensitiesOther iests (not listed) are performed at hourly rates

DISBURSEMENTS

Vehicle Kilometerage

(Note: Vehicle kilomeierage rate is subject to change as

fuel costs vary)

All other disbursements at cost plus 10%

Prices are subject to change without notice.

D2726

Suite A, 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, B.C' VgT 3M4

Ph. 250-756-0355, F ax. 250-7 56-3831

Rate Per ASTM Test Method

, ,1.

l;

,. rltl.rlt',

.l' ,\'. !l- ,,!

.,,y*' " !ii'. nj

'''' l:-Li , *t''- Yl,,!.

i, tL __.I'+ " L't- \"/

L'

D2216

c136 tC117c136c117

D431 8

D422D1557D698

CSA - 423.2

CSA - 423.2

D2172 I D5444D2726D1 559D3203

# 4 - 3179 BARONS ROAD, NANAIMO, B.C. VgT 5W5

PHoNE: (250) 756-9553 FAX: (250) 756-9503

NEWCASTLEENGINEERING LTD.

s066-39CorresPondence

March 6,2013

School District 68 (Nanaimo - Ladysmith)395 Wakesiah AvenueNanaimo, 8"C., VgR 3K6

Attention: Mr. Brent SPohn

Re: CedarSecondarySchoolPlay Field Drainage Report * Fee Proposal

Dear Brent,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide a fee proposal for the Topographic Survey,preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for the playfield drainage problem at Cedar

Secondary School.

Our fee proposal is based telephone discussions with yourself and Steve Stacey ofLewkowich Engineering Assoeiates Ltd., on March 1,2013. We have separated the fee

proposal into various phases of the project and identified our understanding of the scope

of work in each area.

A) Topographic SurveY

. Topographic Survey in area of existing ptay fieid.

. Layout and/or pick up test hole locations.

o Download survey data and import into civil site plan'

o Obtain existing digital file of Cedar Secondary School from School District if available

. Update digital base plan.

Part A Lump Sum

B) Preliminary Design OPtions

$2,300.00

. Liaison with Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. in regards to proposed test hole

investigation.

. Review Geotechnical Report provided by Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.

. Prepare preliminary design to eliminate field drainage problem.

. Forward options to School District.

. Attendance at meeting with School District Staff to review design.

. Address School District comments.

Part B Lump Sum $3,500.00

C) Preliminary Cost Estimate

. Prepare Preliminary Cost Estimate for drainage works to School District for review.

. Address any inquires in regards to cost estimates.

Part C Lump Sum $1,000.00

D) Geotechnical lnvestigation and Report

. Attached is Proposal Fees for Geotechnical Evaluation Services prepared byLewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.

Part D Estimated Fee $10,185.00

Note, additional $500.00 for utility locate if required. Meetings and discussions for designand construction would be extra at hourly rate.

Summary of our fee for the project is as follows:

Pari A $2,300.00Part B $3,500.00Part C 1,000.00Part D (Estimated Fee) $10,185.00

Project Total $16,985.00

Our Total Estimated Fee for the project is 16,985.00 plus HST.

lf you have any questions, or require any fudher information, please contract theundersigned,

Yours truly,Newcastle Engineering Ltd.tu'Scott Lewis, P. Eng.

Addendum C

Donna Reimer

From:Subject:Attachments:

85.27

Discovery Search MailboxFW: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE

CEDAR SECONDARY FRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM Feb 21 2Al4.pdf; CEDAR SECONDARY

SCHOOL FIELD LAYOUT Feb 21 2O74.pdf; Cedar Secondary Preliminary Cost Estimate

February 19 2014.pdf; F1315.02 Cedar Secondary School - Playing Field - GeotechnicalReport.pdf

From: Brent SpohnSent: Friday, February 2L,2A14 3:21 PM

To: 'Bassem Tawfik (btawfik@kmbr.com)'; 'D. Gregg Brown (qbrown@kmbr.com)'; 'Brian Parker'Cc: Pete SaboSubJeCt: FW: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE

Hi Bassem, Gregg, and Brian,

Attached please find preliminary field remediation costing from Newcastle Engineering.

Have a good weekendl

-ffi.,.#,ML%sE . f-rqi;&:s,1\a: {.*h5€.iiTE+

',.'' -''!1 *L;a: =*i-j*,:i*q3r*-€ Sp*i-+ : i=;:j:il**,: -:=:r-:+; 3:,:;+rvi*+r;lii+='i i5l-?;a-i2:: i i=x 15*-?4:-:2=: : ';=:: : *-:1:-i4::3*5 r#ar.+s;=i-: *.v=1i-:c. i1::-+ir*+, *+: -** i=i* I y,..j'i_,., _=:43. :.::.iz

From : Scott Lewis I ma ilto : Scott. Lewis@ newcastleenq i neering.com]Sent: Friday, February 2t,2014 75:L5To: Brent SpohnSubJect: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE

Brent

As requested, attached is our preliminary cost estimate for the Play Field Remediation at Cedar Secondary School.

We have limited the scope of the remediation area to the area that you had provided. The limit of the remediation is

shown on the attached pdf titled "CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FILED LAYOUT Feb 2L, 20L4" .

We have included the following information for your review:

: PIAN tit|Cd, CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FILED LAYOUT, FCb 21.,201.4- PIAN titlEd, TEST PITS, FIELD REMEDATION, FRENCH DRAIN, FCb 21,201.4- Geotechnical Assessment prepared by Lewkowich Engineering Associated Ltd. Dated February 5,20L4- Field Assessment - Preliminary cost Estimate prepared by Newcastle Engineering Ltd, dated Feb 21,201_4

Lewkowich Engineering Associates is currently preparing a supplemental retter to address a couple of items that werebrought to their attention after their report was completed. we will need to make some minor changes to thePreliminary cost Estimate when we receive this retter.

Please review the attached documents and let me know if you require any changes. we will prepare our finalsummaryreport when we receive the additional information from Lewkowich and Associates and any comments from the schoolDistrict.

lf you have any questions, please call.

Thanks

Scott Lewis, p" Eng.Newcastle Engineering Ltd.Suite 4 - 3179 Barons RoadNanaimo, 8.C., VgT 5W5Phone: 250-756-9553 Ext. 24Mobile: 250-616-9052Fax: 250-756-9503www.newcastleengineering.comPlease note that e-maii address is changed ta

ili i litll' "\ *""".,,,{

lliil,'i1

c=4"=D

=.E;*eeY"ig-1. r3

x-=iu*;s!;---<

EE?q3

" 3g: ""2-!za.

i r";ld

P rlPii

"1*".."11rI

--t.-l

\xnx!'e::;5.'-

:'* 3

ga::i=;u!i,-"d

58".6.a?iztiF!s.-ia46s=: b

! i ";.-

ffiHOOLFIELDASSESSMENTPRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE

tt l-

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITI QUANIITY

Schedule A - EarthworksLS I $ i,000.00 s i,000.00

A-01 MoblllzatlonLS I s 1.000.00 s 1.000.00

A-02 enclngCM 2400 $ 25.00 $ 60,000.00

A-03Crrn.I" *d irttall Armtec 140 Non-woven geosynthetic SM 8000 $ 2.00 $ 16,000.00

A-04CM 2404 s 40.00 s 96.000.00

A-05 mnort JUUmm InICK - /Jrlrllr lllrrru) prrCM 2400 $ 4s.00 $ 108,000.00

A-06 lmpon JUUmm rnlcK - /Jllllll rrrrlru) prt I urr E

lmnnrl 100mm thick - ToP Soil

Suoolv and install grass seed

CM 800 s 50.00 s 40.000.00A-07

SM 8000 s 1.00 S 8.000.00A-08

LS I s 10.000.00 $ 10.000.00A-09 E,rosion and Sedlment uontrol

ScheduleA-EarthworksSub-Total $ 340,000'00

ScheduleB-StormSewerLS s 750.00 $ 750.00

B-01 Locate existing iUUmm dlameter btom rewLS $ 3.000.00 $ 3,000.00

B-02In-15d*m dia per pipe to erisitlg qranholg-------r,. ^-r :--+^tl ,^rl,-fr p\/a qnR ?i Stnm dr

I,S I $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00B-03

LM 200 $ 1 10.00 $ 22,000.00

s 50.000.00

$ 48,000.00

B-04@plete with drain rock bedding and

LM 500 $ 100.00B-05

LM 600 s 80.00B-06

00mmSDR35perforatedPVCcompletewlthdl.alnIocKDeoolngajlu

E,A t2 $ s00.00 $ 6.000.00B-07 iuDDl\ and tnstall cleanouls

EA 100 $ 1s.00 s 1.500.00B-08

EA I $ 750.00 s 7s0.00ts-u9 lKolse exlStln8 mannote rtur crsvarrutr tu t"o""" ""'"'"" s'"*'^*

rks Sub-Total $ 133,000.00Schedule B - Earthwt

Schedule C - IrrigationLS

h ^^^n nn:N Z.UUU.UU6 lnnnnnJ /.uvv.vv

c-01c-02 iotino irrioafion electrical svstem LS $ 3.000.00 s 3,000.00

$ i 5,000.00I,S s 15,000.00c-03

Sunolv and install irrigation system LS s 60.000.00 s 60.000.00c-04

Schedule C - Irrigation Sub-Total $ 80,000.00

s 553,000.00

$ 82,950.00

$ 82,950.00

$ 718,900.00

$ 35,945.00

$ 754,845.00

Overall Subtotal

ContingencY 157o

Engineering 157o

Sub-TotalGST 5%

DRAFT

FORCOMMENTTotal PreliminarY Cost Estimate

Cedar Secondary School

Field Assessment - Preliminary Cost Estimate

s066-39February 21,2014

Page 1

Addendum D

Donna Reimer

From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryAttachments: 74'02-26 - Cedar Secondary Class C FOR DISCUSSION.xIsx; 74-02-26 - Cedar Secondary

Class C FOR DISCUSSION.pdf

Importance: High

BS-28

From: Brent SpohnSent: Thursday, February 27,2014 7:50 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject: FW: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryImpoftance: High

FYI

From: Jan Williams fmailto:jwifliams@unitechcm.ca]Sent: Wednesday, February 26,2014 77:25To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary

Hi Brent,Attached is our updated 'Class C for Discussion' with the exterior doors and canopies included in the base cost inlieu of optional items as well as the different breakdowns of 5/ft2 for demo, construction with and without civil,and the total project.Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions.

Cheers,

Jan Michael Williams, c.rech.Preiject Managei"

r€I: UruXTECH

Unitech Construction Management Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1530,56th StreetDelta, B.C. Canada V4L zA8T 604 943 8845 F 6c,4 943 0912 w i^r r4/.uEllethals-aa

CE€eF* T* Se* E4&.gg Gaer C.ddezefle C&*+s* Lrae€6e,c&

This e-mai1 pessar. is confrdential, may be-privileged and is intended for the exclusive use o{the addrssee. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not the intendedrecipient, or an employee or agent responsibie for delivering this message to the intended recipient, yo;;; #tt;;tlfi;;1that anyais?tosure, ;i"*;;; ".

reproduction of this e-mail message is strictly proiribited. ff the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e.mailimmediately and delete this e-mai1 message and destroy ali eopies.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Jan WilliamsSent: Wednesday, February 26,ZAl4 2:59 pM

To: 'Brent Spohn'Cc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary

Hi Brent,Attached for your reference is our 'Class C Estimate for Discussion.,Talk to you shortly.

Cheers,

Jan Michael'Williams, c.rech.Project Manager

I@r{I UilITECH

Unitech Construction Management Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1S3o, S6th StreetDelta, B.C" Canada V4L 2A8T 6o4 943 8845 F 6c'4 g4g a9L2 w ,nw-r.r'.unitechcm.ca

Ctri*& ?$ See Whg {}zrv" CZiersis C*aee:s* Lrar,ieec&

From: Brent Spohn Imailto:BSpohn@sd68.bc.ca]Sent: Monday, February 24,2014 9:49 AMTo: Jan WilliamsCc: Brian Parker; 'Bassem Tawfik (btawfik@kmbr.com)'; 'D. Gregg Brown (gbrown@kmbr.com),Subject: RE: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryImpodancet High

Hi Jan,

Good to hear from you.

At this point, I do not have elevations for any new millwork. Perhaps Bassem or Gregg can respond?

Brent

From : lan Williams [mailto :jwilliams@u nitechcm.ca]Sent: Monday, February 24,2014 0g:39

This e-mail message, is confidential, may be- privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intendedrecipient, or an-eyPloYee.or a8ent responsible for.d_elivering this message to the intendecl recipient, you ,." t "..Lv ""tln.a

tf,ut u"v ai.'.foro.", A;;;;;;, o.reproduction of t}is e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached o1. i" ,rrit "o*"

to v*i pl"*" irr"", tt . ."r,a". ry."t * **uitimmediateiy and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies.

Please consider the envircnment befere printing this email.

To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary

Hi Brent,Do you have elevations of the new millwork?other than that, at this point, we are moving along well.I will keep you posted otherwise.

Cheers,

Jan Michael Williarns, c.tech.

Project Manager

rer: U}IITECH

Unitech Conslructinn Management Ltd,Suite 4oo - 1530, 56th StreetDelta, B.C. Canada V4L zAB\ 6049438845 F 6o4g47o9L2 w www.unitechcm.ca

Cidcle ?!:,9ee E*&g Gac-e" {.daerets Cle.r*:se L.t*iteeil

i;;;= arent Spohn Imaiito:BSpohn@sd68.bc.calSent: Monday, February 24,2A14 9:28 AMTo: Brian ParkerCc: 'Bassem Tawfik (btawfik@kmbr.com)'; 'D. Gregg Brown (gbrown@kmbr.com)'Subject: Cedar Conversion to Elementary

Hi Brian,

Just wanted to confirm you have everything you need for your Cedar Conversion costing exercise?

lf you're missing anything significant please let me know.

l'll forward any new information as it becomes available.

Regards,

@

This e'maii message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exelusive use ofthe addressee. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not tl-re intendedrecipient, or an-employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any diilosure, distribution orreprodr:ction of this e-maii messa-ge is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unlcrown to you, please inform tie sender by r"to- *-"ifimmediately and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies.

Please consider the environrnent before printing this ernail.

p€efd&3&1*

l-:i**-: i,'tc{}Y&f4=+ei ,.ti; ii * l .-.,

*r*.i Eg*i:= i i:a;:i!i:;e* fia;:=-:*g .E:,1pq:rr.:;**ii-.4:i=r:: :51]-:+:.-5::: i f:;r :5L1,:l:-=:*: : **it ii;a.?:3-j:ill:*-= W=!.=*ia* Avsru; i-i*i-:*i.-:=. SC ";*= ,1iii : .+i=r_.;3++,3.=:.c=

rff uNltgct'lCedsr Ssondary School

o74.7241,

Class'C' Estimate26-Febl4

WalE, Millwork, Ooors,

ProjedOuration in months

6;;lition and removalof existins millworL

doo6,ove.headdoo.,walls,'eilin&sawdustdtradion piping,tackboardsandwhit€boa'ds

cuttinB..d removal ofexistitg exterior w'll

Remove enlire steel studure and asso'i'ted

e^or".xttiq noo, "na

preP lorfuture floor

Demolition and removal of existin8 ceilh8,

millwork, doo6, walls,.eilinE, tackboards and

s18,ffi.@

lnctuded in.onqete cuting below

s2o,ffi.m

1.@

doo6, windos, overhead door, walb, eilirg'

teckboards and whtebo.rds

iliiGliliii.e rb una prepror ruture loor

Demolition and removal olexi{ing ceiline,

millwork, do06, overheaddoor,walls,ceiling'

tackboards and whiteboards

and refioval ofexistint millwor&

iIre exttine ttoor ara preP f'rfuture

and removal ofexi3tinB millwork,

doo6, ove.head door, wails, @ilin8,

ta.kboards and whiieboard5

reii!"rffim "na PrePfor rut!re froor

1m

2,170-60 s9,767.7O

lnterior Walts, Millwor( Doo6,

lnterior wails, Millwork, Doors,t.@

2,173-74

1.@

s7,s@.m

4_50 $e,781.89

s10,m.m

Demolition and removal ofexGtin8 ceiling,

millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceilirg'

tackboards and whiteboa'ds

Ceilin& lnterior Walts, Millwork, Doors, Defrolition and 'emoval

oferisting millwo*'

rack,Nhiteboards :"[:::'j::",',*[;:::',""'*

Auow 5,m@ 1@ s6s@6

dooB, overhead door,walls, ceiling, Allow 14,m.m 1m S14,m@

Estimated co5tfrom Can@r- cod"ete cuELng

ofinterior and exterior tilluP concrete w'lk

for new openings as shown on drawings

excludingthe ones a. wish list

Based on E*imateirom Cancor' Febr!ary

s25.@.m 2s,2014t.m

SkyJithts

Interio. Padition Wails

12 Ba hanger wire carryingchanneJ, acolstj.ceil'g panel, hattiack,2 coae paintTwo 5l8" x 1018,kiptettazed skytighs,2panes of Slass with acryti. bubbte6" steel stud,5/8" d/w.il painted both sid€.

5/Cwood stain gr4 Steej fr.me, hardware,

Steel hot h PS ho@s, Wre iBt & poihaNO PANIC MRDWARESopply & i.stallation ofnew miilworksupply and instattation of whiteboardsSupplyandinstallation ottackboards

5.F

5.F

S,F,

Ea.

E..Ea.

9.a0

37.S

8.@

715.@

1,191.N165.m315.4122s.41

1,013.54 59,932.69

124.4a 54,667.9o

1,Ss.s3 S15,C2.69

5.@ S4,2S.@ Re use existiig hardware

2.@ Sa.@ tupnae heh di@.d btow205.28 533,870.45

9.@ 52,838.5911.@ 52.47957

lnterior PadttionWafls

T-Ba. Ceiling

GWB Ceilinelnte.ior Padition Wall:

supply & insiall.tion of newnooilnp5" *ee{ *ud,5/8.d/wail painted both sides

2 coats painl 5/8" d.watt, R8sp.ayroam. ZxEseel fuds,1/2" plf, undedar R6 insut, sirap't& back'9, cementitious panebS/Cwood *ai. grd, Steet t.me, hardware.

Cdting ind removat oiertsting erte.iorw.lt

Steel doubJe doori. Ps fr.mes, hdwe inst&

Exterior @nopies above etrerior doo.s

Supply & installatlon of newnoodng

12 gi hangerwire, crrying channet, E@us!i<

5/8 d/wall, Metat HarTrack, painted6" sreel *ud,5/8,'dlwalt painied both sides

5/Cwood *ain srd, Sreet f.ane, hardware,

Steel door in PSframes, hdwre in$& paint NOPANICHARDWARE1 1/2" 22 gauge metat deckin8, steet f.ahin&

Supply & in*all.tion ofnew miilworkSupply & in*Eliation ot new bEse and upper

Supplyand installationof whiteboards5!pplyand,nstallationof tackboadsincoridor in lieu ofdkot.v c.ser

6.@ 2,770.60

3.90 \41.773.35 243,52

8.m $3.27

715.@ 7.m

1,p1.m z@

7,ff.@ 2_@165.@ 59.31

291.@ 21.U315.41 4.m

225.47 2_@

s13,023.60

sss2-e?s816.11

s7,225.43

S5,m5.@ Reuse exhri.t hardware

51s,@.rcs11,436.11

s6,487.68t7,261.U

s49.82

S,F

277.35

y,991.52

s2 27a q

47.39 51,0&.33

!@ S715.@

1.m s1,1S_@

l.m 51,89.@1.@ 59,m.m

s.F

S,F

Ea.

Ea.

€a.

Ea-

E!.

T'BarCeiling

lnte.ior P.rtition W!lb

T-EarCeiling

lnterior Padtion Watk

Glazed Paditions and Sidetites

6" +eel *ud, 5/8,' d/walt pajnled both sides

Steel tuot ]n PS homd, hdwft id & pohtNOPANICMRDWAre1 7/2" 2 guqe meto! de.ktnq, neet Jruaihg,

Supply & installation oi new miltworkSupply aod ihstallation of whiieboardssupply and in*allation of tackboardr

s!pply & jn*allano. oi new noon^n

-12 ga hanser urq Grryina.lan^eiao,*t

Supply& insta lation ofnewioorins12 Ba ha.gerwtq ca.ryihg chan.et, acoustic

5" *eel st!d,5/8,, d/wall painted both sides

Tempered Sl.ssto tea.ninsassisrance room -

s/Cwood stai. grd, Steel frame ha.dware,

Supp y & instaltation ofnew miuworkS!pply and installetion oi whireboards

Sopply & insral ation of newTempe.edgtassto.ew.oil.bor.tion area

Supply & instaltarioo oinew floorina12 g. hangerUrq €rrying channet, a@ustic

6" *eel *ud, s/8. d/walt painted both sider

S/Cwood *ain Brd, Sleel fiame, hardwar-.,

supply & insrailation olnew millworkSupplyand in*allationoiwhiteboards

s9,7@.19

s2,767.10

s3,174.58

5o.@ Sepeture ibm didded bbw

$O.@ sep@re treh e.nhed bbws75,229.72

s946.23s1,127.0s

S,F

S,F

Eo.

Ea.

6.m

:.90

8.m

7,791.W

7.5@.@165.m315.41225.47

555.82

396.85

z@92_30

3.@5.@

?,186 8.1241)

5s,989.07

s6,s78.55

s2,13s.13

52,145.m Re use exkting hardwareS19,981.69

s946_23

1,535.66

822.40

81.m

3.@121.10

3.m

635.5852.@

T-BarCeiling

.terior Pantion Watt!

s13,92_s2

52,610.36

5s,7s.92

5715.@ R€ useexhijn8 hardwares15,45.54

s630.82Ea.

669.32

n3.69

1.@93.62

2.AO

civitwork lmlwo*r, **. **e,.nd tri8arion Be<.d on Newca*le EnSineeri.s's Estimate

Esr. 553,W.m 1.m s553,m.&

Ensineering

% 553,m-@ $.m s82,9so.s9{ 553,m.@ 15.S s82,950.m

Residential buildi.s per sqosre foot co5t 26 @@ Est gased on Elect Consultant EstimateBqilding

10.2 5!perintendent

10.3 Const.udion G€neral Co.ditions

10.4 Constudion Managem€nt F€es

wrap !p General Liabilitya.d BuildersRisk

OnsitesuperyEio. includinEsitetransPod,

Gene.al conditiont for 3ite preparation and

Iot3l Co.*rudion Management Fees &

Allow 9,s.@ 1.m 59,5@@

Allow 42,@-@ 1.@ S42,mm

Allow 7!2,271.87 1.@ 5112,271.87

Allow 75.m.@ 1.m S75,m.m

!uit elementary students if req!ired

Pl.yground Reloc.tion

11.1 Construdion Co.tingenq

11.2 Design contingenq

ol.vsround eq!iomentAllow:n.e for unforeseen.hanges during

constuction 99 99 99

Ailowan.e for remeasured hems, design

1O.m \473,A!4.23 s147,:01.42

5.m 1.473.014,23 573,650.71

of uhneeded lockeE etc Allow zs.m.@Ouldoor dassroom, plants, spodssrea etc- Allow 15,@.mReiootion ofWoodbank and NCI school

1.@ S2s,m1.@ s15,@

Budget as perSD 68 estimate dated Oec 10,

1.@ 5175,@ 2013175,@.m

develoDm ent ch anres 9999@ %

12.1 Consultants Fees - qlote consultant Fees Allorv So

12.1 ConsultanE Fees- E*imaied12.2 conslltants oisbursements- Quote consultant Disbursemenb ALlow ' 50 "---_------__cl13.1 Land purdase Land cosr Allow S0

13.2 Develooment Costs

Consultant Fees Estimated

Co{ perSquare F@t - Oemolition

costpersqu.reF6t-Newconstrudio. IncudingConstudionMa.agefrentFees_NOT NCLUD|NGovilwod

Cost persquar€ F6t - New Construdio. lncluding @nskudion Ma.ageme.t Fees- INCLUDTNG Civil work

cost per Squa.e F@t - Projed

Co* perftuare Meter - Demolition

co*perftuareMeter.Newconstudionlncludingcoil*rldionManagementFees'NoTlNcLUDlNGcivilwoilCo* perftuare Mder -New Constudion lncluding Con*.ldion Management Fees_ INCLUDING Civil work

Cost perSquare Mder - Prcjed

S10.87

$118.17

s167.66

s178-52

S116.9s

s1,272.0s

S1,s.57

s1,92r.67

Itfiffiffiii*-*-iiill.*aq*-".'

-ffinfu

*.tu. walB tudas d.d removal ol eri*lns exredor wall

&.turboB - blbbtutuaA@ &lo.tk@&t Ed

s.eel @r io PS ffrdes, Mwre i6 & FiatNaPANI'HARDWARE Ed

Sted bor in PS ftutu, Hw.e th* & PohtNOPANICHARDWAAE&etur .snopies obva etkn.t doc$

a. -k4dtl. il& i EE u iN b & ea, tid aa b*de b@tbn to su lt e ktuntq nu* n&

72@.@ Z@ s4@.@

1,191-@ 2.@ s4e@

Ab* 6,@.@ 1.@ 56,N.@

!,19.@

Ee L1q,@ L@ 52,382.@Nroe 7,sN.@ 2.N $ls,w.@

Addendum E

Donna Reimer

From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar - alternate plan to match enrolment at a lower costAttachments: CE - Enrollment Projections 201-5- 2020.pdf; Altenate Plan -March 2.pdf; Base Plan.pdf;

Design aid areas.pdf

Importance: High

PS-33

From: Pete SaboSent: Sunday, March 02,2014 1;54 PM

To: Cathal Walsh; Bob Esliger; Bassem Tawfik (btawfik@kmbr.com); Gregg Brown (gbrown@kmbr.com); Brian Parker(bparker@u nitechcm.ca)Cc: John Blain; Brent Spohn; 'jwilliams@unitechcm.ca'; lrowley@heroldengineering.com; Les Brown(les@rbenqineering.ca); Stephen McNicholls (stephen.mcnicholls@rpeno.ca); Scott Lewis(Scott. Lewis@ newcastleeng ineering.com)Subject: Cedar - alternate plan to match enrolment at a lower costImportance: High

To all,

Further to the Board motions on Feb 6th lwith respect to NO and EDR) and the costing received from Unitech, Facilitieshas is proposing the attached 'alternative'to the existing conversion plan.

We looked a Cathal's enrolment projection and using A4+B3 and it now looks like we have a forecast enrolment ofaround297. Ourcurrentdesignisfor38T. Basedonthisinformation-tobeconfirmedbyLS-weshouldbeabletoreduce the number of Gl rooms required for opening.

I spoke with JB regarding the possible reductlon of spaces and the attached alternate "plan" and he and I are nowofficially requesting your comments (ASAP) as we believe this is a viable plan to proceed with.

As the most costly space is the Woodwork shop conversion, we now propose an alternate that would see:

o The construction shop remaino Room 204 converted to a grade 7 roomo Room 202-1- used as a break out room/Da Vinci space.o Room 202 used as a collaboration/breakout/special education space.o Foods/Textile room 200 converted to a Glo Foods 1"07 converted to a Gl

This change would include:

o Loss offour Gl and one SP ED. room. The gain of 3 good size Gl roomso Retain collaboration space.r Provide a grouping of 3 (possibly 6-7)Gl roomso Retention of Servery and Storage room for the use of the school, PAC and community in the provision of food

services.

o Significant reduction is construction cost as we are avoiding all work in the woodwork shop.o Retention the woodshop for possible further education uses and/or use by the community.o No moving of walls in 202,204, or 1a7o Causethelossof aSPEDspace. ThisfunctionwouldneedtobeperformedoutoftheAdminarea,the

Counselling area, the Learning Commons, the stage, the MP room, the Music Room, the Da Vinci studio, etc., as

space was available"o A reduction of opening capacity from 387 to 363 ------- 38 K + 325 (1-7)o Confirmation of an opening enrollment less than 363 could result in further savings as we could avoid the

renovation of one of the foods rooms.

I will work with Brent Spohn to put together an order of magnitude "cost reduction" for the above option as well as aphasedoptiontothePlaygroundandPlayfieldareas(usingUnitech'sandNewcastle's)estimate) -topresenttoSeniorManagement on Monday at 11am.

Any and allcomments, thoughts, cost advice, etc. that is received priorto 10:30 am Monday would be most appreciated.

Brent and I will be considering a School Construction Committee meeting some time the week of March 3 or early in theweek of March loth to discuss the status of the planning prior to the March 13th business committee. As information isdeveloping, I request your confidence in these discussions untilwe can advise the School Construction Committee of ourwork to date.

Thanks,

Pete

*ffi*-.ffi,€-:-siis". ** 4*€ eiet F -tc +}Yq€"f J

6,H

t r'U*€-ii.' 5a*i=:trL=Pete Sabo i *ir*eitr +i F;er;ning =-* *i;=*rai;*ns*iiec: 2i* 7d j-5=#5 i ,*ifi=* :5* 754-55:'i i -=;< 25+1 :4:-5:5:,1"15 ,*a;<e*i=n A=erue, i'i+**l:i:+:. A* V$= 3i<* i .*,=:+i.,,.-#S3 3r e*

Enrollment Projections For Cedar Elementory 2075 - 2079;Considerotions To North Oyster And South Wellington

A1+81A1+82A1+83A1+84

A2+81AZ+ Bz

A2+83A2+84

43+8143+8243+8343+84

A4+81A4+82A4+83A4+84

By Grade ::j.i'.20i5:: -.::,-i26rr= ,,,,?,20fl,1:,:: :...'*201'9.-=

Baragar Data Using

Only WoodbankPrimary & North Cedarlntermediate Schools

K 28 32 44 43 431 32 23 26 35 352 34 32 24 26 37

3 28 33 31 22 25

4 40 29 32 31 22

5 37 4A 28 31 295 35 34 37 25 28

7 43 35 35 37 25

Totals 277 258 257 251, 244

Considerations

A1 100% North Oyster

AZ 60% North Oyster

43 30% North Oyster

A4 0% North Oyster

81 100% South Wellington

82 60% South Wellington

83 30% South Wellington

84 0% South Wellineton

444 424 432 425 4\8417 397 405 398 391

396 376 384 377 374375 356 364 357 3s0

404 38s 389 383 376377 3s8 362 355 348

357 337 342 335 328

336 3L7 321 315 308

375 355 357 351 344348 328 330 324 317

327 308 310 303 296307 287 289 283 276

345 326 325 319 312318 299 298 292 285

297 278 277 277 264277 258 257 251" 244

,t*J-d:-r:il:

lr:i;'

g;f.:] Jrl+, i -i-t:'-i-**-

*.-;.* lil

'(-, s'\,\' \\,\\

qi.\{er i"l(

\\iJ:. I

E:"a

,11' .t

\,' 't' ' '.L=_=';t. :.

Xri ,

E!;i.( r{i, r7:, t'a:" l;t".

:r:: i

QI:l

:j

-t t)c:{i-

r?lfi z

?5:.--': :.Lr-

.', <:,4{.

C r!C) €t

FF T

:-* {

.g'

i

!i :l

:J .ir,(

bH ,f-gru;r:.lE.u)

F

-fH5 &81t{E.- E *-il{ I t* H

,Ef $$ 3 $ .8*FT#ESS g 3 i EssiEHEsx $ t u E*

*s

&e"- \*l

qflt r*\r#A,'dY *S#

- S.h* {a{k €*- "G,s" de*t**r';urx *3*&-:?g %s %F.*qljFq* e _&"*x..- - g,Esaa

€ 8q*"* x*-*€ i-;t !b*.r

Xa

i9Ir,

Z1rnl*lPIalo_l=lololrrlOIqLL I -".

-l'LI ,

al.>I:n\U

rY

=f:{E& -'

Addendum F

Donna Reimer

From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and SummaryAttachments: 1,4-A3-07 - Cedar Secondary Class C - Alternate After Discussion.xlsx; 14-03-07 - Cedar

Secondary - Alternate Class C Summary GENERAL.pdf

BS-37

From: Brent SpohnSent: Monday, March L0,2014 B:09 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject: FW: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and Summary

FYI

From : Ja n Williams Imailto :jwilliams@unitechcm.ca]Sent: Friday, March 07,20L4 70t36To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and Summary

Morning Brent,Attached is our revised alternate estimate in excel format and as a one page summaryas requested in pdfformat.Give me a call if you have any questions.

Cheers,

Jan Miehael Williams, c.Tech.

Project Managei'

I€ElI UNITECH

p;*jr:t* -",':lh i:* rpi:se.urutecn uonsu:ucaon Managernent Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1530, 56th StreetDeita, B.C. Canada V4L zA8T 6a4 9438845 F 6c.4949c912 w wwrv.unitechcm.ca

Cdde& ?b se* trfu?ag {32;-x {li*ga{s f&a<ese Lla-+dsee&

This e-mail message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intendedreeipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution orreproduction of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e-mailimmediately and delete this e.mail message and destroy all copies.

r''ae(?7 Please consider the env;ronment before printing this email.

I5 ururrEcHCedar Secondary School

0

77,a53

Project Duration in months

Alternate Class'C' Estimate7-Mar.14

- - vl tilnce llgm F! 1 27 9llf c.lLtg D..i-T::ligl

--' " :::::::'::': t::N(ilQBIStDecrease

SF Gross Area

M2 Gross Area

cutting out concrete and leaving columnsto

Concrete Cut-outs Cutting out concrete and leaving columns to

suooort structural beam aboveSo.oO New jtem ofwork now included

Remove exasting floor and prep for future floor

Demolition and removal of existing millwork,

doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,sawdust

extraction piping, tackboards and whiteboards

Cutting and removal of existing exterior wall

Remove enti.e steel structure and associated

walls and ductwork.

4.50

18,500.00

20.000.00

lncluded in concrete cutting below

Walls, Millwork, Doors, Tack/Whiteboards

FloorinB

Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,

millwork, doors, walls, ceilinE, tackboards and

whiteboardsRemove existing floor and prep for future floor

tnreri- Wrtt.. l/l,ll.ork, Doors, Tackfwhiteboards Demolition and removal of existing millworl!

52.5oo.ooReduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side

of existing interior partitions in lieu of entire

50.00 room area

doors, windows, overhead door, walls, ceiling,

tackboards and whiteboards

Remove existing floor and prep for future floor

Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,

millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,

tackboards and whiteboardsCutting and removal of existing exterior wall

:'::.aa:a=.'a aReduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either sideFlooring

Ceiling, lnterior Wells, Millwork, Doors,

Tack/Whiteboards

Exterior Walls

:,- ::j 1: : :;,';,:1,1 o1 .*isting interior partitions in lieu of entire

.:,:::,'].:,$r*4;it roo- "

ru"

'::'t4F@..Q9-

4.50

8,000.00

774.25 |

I

1.00 I

flooring to 3-foot strip on either sideFlooring

ceiling, lnterior Walls, M illwork, Doors,

Tack/Whiteboards

i.:l-::l,:,':' l of existin8 inte rior pa ft itions in lie u of entire

:,,!.i-l'-? '""^"'""

.:::$5;E0o$Sl

Remove existing floor and prep for future floor

Demolition and removal of existing millwork,

doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling, tackboards

and whiteboards

296.70 t'=

1.00 i.::.i_

Flooring

Interior Walls, Millwork, Doors, Tack/Whiteboards

Exterior Walls

Remove existing floor and prep forfuture floor

Demolition and removal ofexisting millwork,

doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling, tackboards

and whiteboardsCutting and removal ofexisting exterior wall

10,000.00

New flooring to 3-foot strip on either side of

$0.00 existins interior partitions

So.oo

lncluded in concrete cuttinB below

trt"ri.^//"lkJ,Ail*.diDoors,Tack/Whiteboards DemolitionandremovalofexistinBmillwork,doors, overhead door, walls, ceilinS, tackboards

and whiteboards7,500.00

Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side

of existing interior partitions in lieu of entire

room area

Flooring

Ceiling, lnteraor Walls, Millwork, Doors,

Tack/Whiteboards

Remove existing floor and prep for future floor

Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,

millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,

tackboards and whiteboards

Estimated cost from Cancor - Concrete cutting o,

interior and exterior tilt-up concrete walls for

new openings as shown on drawings excluding

the ones as wish list

Concrete CuttinE

15,000.00 1.00 S25,OO0.oO Reduce wall openings to minimum required

Flooring

T-8ar Ceiling

Skylishts

lnterior Partition Walls

lnterior Doors

Erteilar Doors

MillworkWhiteboardsTackboards

Supply & installation of new flooring

12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic

ceil'g panel, hat track, 2 coats PaintTwo 5'-8" x 10'-8" triple glazed skylights, 2 panes

of Elass with acrylic bubble

6" steel stud, 5/8" d/wall painted both sides

S/C wood stain trd, Steel frame, hardware,

painted,

Steel door in Ps lrames, hdwre iist & pqint NO

PANIC HARDWARE

Supply & installation of new millwork

Supplv and installation of whiteboardssupplv and installation of tackboards

Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side

ofexisting interior pafritions in lieu ofentire50.00 room areaS,F.

allow

s.F.

s.F.

Ea.

Eo.

allowEa.

6.00

2,500.00

37.50

8.00

715.00

1,191.0010,000.00

375.47

225.47

- Sooo

So oo

so.o0

So.o0 Re use existing hardware

2.OO SO.ffiseperuteitemestimotedhelow1.OO s10,000.005.OO s1,577.0s6.00 57,352.46

supply & installation of new flooring

6.00

8.00Interior Partition walls

Exterior Walls

lnterior Doors

Exterior Doors

Exterior Canooies

6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides

2 coats paint, 5/8" d.wall, R8 sprayfoam, 2x6

steel studs,l/2" ply, underlay, R6 insul, strap'g &

back'g, cementitious panels

s/C wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.

Steel double door in Ps frames, hdwre inst &

paintExterior canopies above exterior doors

S. F.

Ea.

22.46

715.O0

1,850.00

9.000.00

Supply & installation of new flooring

T-Bar Ceiling

GWB Ceilinc

lnterior Partition Walls

lnterior Doors

Exterior Doors

Exterior Canopies

MillworkKitchen Millwork

WhiteboardsTackboards

12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic

ceil'g panel

5/8 d/wall, Metal Hat Track , Painted

6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides

S/c wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,painted.

Steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO

PANIC HARDWARE1 1/2" 22 gauge metal decking, steel framing,painted flashinesSupply & installation of new millworkSupply & installation of new base and upper

millworksupply and installation of whiteboardsSupply and installation of tackboards in corridor

in lieu of disolav cases

S, F.

S.F.

5t

S.F.

Ea.

Ea.

L.F.

L.F,

Ea-

6.00

3.903.35

8,00

715.00

1,191.00

7,500.00165.00

29-t.O0

315.41

Flooring

T-8ar Ceiling

lnterior Partition Walls

lnterior Doors

Exterior Doors

Exteilor Cdnopies

MillworkWhiteboardsTackboards

Supply & installation of new flooring

12 ga hanger wire, carryinB channel, acoustic

ceil'g panel

6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides

S/C wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,

painted.Steet doot in PS f.ames, hdwte inst & pdint NO

PANl,CHARDWARE7 7/2" 22 guoge metst decking. steel frdming,ooioted floshiaosSupplv & installation of new millwork

Supplv and installation of whiteboardssupply and installation of tackboards

s. F.

S.F.

s.F.

Eo,

Ed.

L.F.

Ea,

Ea.

6.00

3.90

8.00

715.00

1,197.N

7,500.&165.00315.41

225.47

296.70 i:=:

ss5.82

395.86

2.00 |i'i=

2.OO

=92.30 ?.;:::

3.00

:: Reduce floorinc to 3-foot strip on either side

':iof existing interior partitions in tieu of entire

item estimoted below

:)seporote item estimdted below

5.00 ii':.:=

Supplv & installation of new floo.ingFloorang

T-Bar Ceiling

lnterior Partition Walls

Glazed Partitions and Sidelites

lnterior Doors

12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic

ceil't panel

6" steel stud, 5/8" d/wall painted both sides

Tempered glass to learning assistance room

assumed 7'heiehtS/C wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.

S.F.

s,F.

s.F.

S.F.

Ea.

6.00

3,90

8.00

26.36

715.00

Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side

ofexisting interior paditions in lieu ofentireSo.oo room area

s0.00

so.oo

s0.00

SO.OO Re use existing hardware

Steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO

PANIC HARDWARESupply & installation of new millwork

Supply and installation of whiteboards

Supply & installation of new flooring6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides

S/C wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,painted.steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO

PANIC HARDWAREsupplv & installation of new millworksupplv and installation of whiteboardsSupply and installation of tackboardsTempered glass to new collaboration area

L.F

S.F.

Ea.

L.F.

Ea.

s.F.

6.00

8.00

715.00

1,191.00165.00375.47

225,4r26.36

new flooring and use existingFlooringlnterior Partition Walls

lnterior Doors

E*erior Doors

MiilworkWhiteboardsTackboards

Glazed Partitions52.OO

Supply & installation of new flooring

12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic

ceil'g panel

6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides

s/c wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.

steel door in Ps frames, hdwre inst & paint NO

PANIC HARDWAREsupply & installation of hew millworksupply and installation of whiteboards

S.F,

6.00

3.90

8.00

715.00

1,191.00165.00315.41

flooring to 3-foot strip on either side

existinE interior partitions in lieu ofentireroom area

Re use existing hardware

T-Bar ceiling

lnterior Partition Walls

lnterior Doors

Exterior Doors

MillworkWhiteboards

L,F

Ea.

Est. 40,000.00 ,.00 545,000.00 Reduced to match revised oppenings

CivilWork Earthworks,stormsewerandirrigation .. - .- QuotefromNewcastleEngineering

Allow 600,000.00 1.00 ,]56@,000.00 includins small continqencv

ContingencyEngineering

- 1.00- So.oo

as per latest concept leavinB

Wood shop alone and renovating the two

Based on Mechanical Consultant Estimate

sprinklers, water lines

23 00 00

23 00 00

200,000.00

72.00

1.00 S2oo,ooo.oo foods rooms

So.oo7.1 IMechanical to Building

7.2 Plumbing

8.1 Electrical to Buildine Based on Electrical Consultant Estimateas per latest concepl

Wood Shop alone and renovating the twofoods rooms. reusing exasting lights, power

5150,000.00 and data where possible

10.1 lnsurance

10.2 Superintendent

10.3 Construction General Conditions

10.4 Construction Management Fees

Wrap up Geheral Liability and Builders Risk

On site superuision including site transpoft, and

LoA if reouiredGeneral Conditions for site preparation and

construction facilitvTotal Construction Management Fees &

Disbursements

175,000.00

9,500.00

42,O00.00

172,277.87

75,000.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Building Modifications

Landscaping

Playground Relocation

11.1 Construction Contingency

11.2 Desicn Contingency

To suit elementary students if required -

lowering desks, basketball backstops, .emoval ofunneeded lockers etcOutdoor classroom, plants, sports area etc.

Relocation of woodbank and NCI schoolplavsround equipmentAllowance for unforeseen changes durihg

construction 99 99 99 %

Allowance for remeasured items, design

Allow 15,ooo.oo 1.00 50.00

Allow 160,000.00

% 600,000.00 15.00 s0.00

Budget as per 5D 68 estimate dated Dec 10,

1.OO 5160,000.00 2013 excludine seo. contieencv

25,000.00

development chanEes 99 99 00 "/.

6.00 7,422,875,77 585,372.55 Contingency reduced from 1070

3.OO 1,422,875,77 542,686.27 contintency reduced from 10%

12.1 Consultants Fees - Quote Consultant Fees Allow 16 OO S0 00

l2.l consultants Fees - Estimated consultant Fees Estimated Allow f ,422,a75 77 76'00 5-227,680.'1.2

6,000.00 1.00 . 56;000.0012.2 Consultants Disbursements - QuoteEngineering Fees - Quote

Consultant DisbursementsEngineering

Cost per Square Foot - Demolition

Cost per Square Foot - New Construction

Cost per Square Foot - New Construction

Cost per Square Foot - Project

Cost per Square Meter - Demolition

Cost per Square Meter - New Constructton

Cost per Square Meter - New Construction

Cost per Square Meter - Project

lncluding Construction N4anagement Fees

lncluding Construction N4anagement Fees

lncluding Construction Management Fees

lncluding Construction Management Fees

NoT INCLUDING civil work

INCLUDING Civilwork

NOI INCLUDING Civil work

INcLUDING Civilwork

s4.81

S63.7s

$114.33

S166.03

Ss1.83

S68G.21

$1,230.64

5r,787.27

Exterior Wolls Cutting oid removol of existing exterior wsllfor the new doot

Exterior D@rs - Cotlabordtioo Arco & Clossroow Steel door in PS lromes, hdwre inst & pdifrt NO

PANIC HARDWANE

Ed. 1,2M,N

Eo. 7,797.(n

Eo. 1"150.N

fo. 1,191.00

Allow 7,5N.U)

2,00 s2,300.00

2.W s2,382.002.(n s15,0N.U)

2.00

2.N

Cutting ond removol of existing erterior woll

Steel doot in PS frones, hdw.e inst & point NO

PANICHARDWAREE derior conopies obove exterior doors

Erter'pt wslls

trterior Doos

Erterior Compies

Re-instoll exining lrinols & frnities to lowtelevdtiofr to svit elemeotory students

Urinols & VilitiesAtlow 6,0&00 7.AO s6,000.N

fflnr Io 6rG iorrrrqs ,r&toil film b gt6t toitings loot irlg ow ffittl'iurwilea 53527.50 As per supplier, based on frosted film

rT UNTTECHCedar Secondary School

DemolitionDemolition and removal of existing interior walls, ceilings, doors, millwork,

tackboards and whiteboards as required (not including concrete cut-outs)

Concrete Cut-outsBudget price from Cancor Cutting and Coring to cut interior and exterior tilt-upconcrete walls for new openings

New ConstructionNew construction and general improvements to rooms as required: New flooring,

interior partitions, t bar ceilings, millwork, exterior wall patching and interiorglazing to match existing

Exterior CanopiesBudget price from Steeltec to supply new exterior canopies above exterior doors

Structural SteelBudget price from Holdfast Metals to provide structural metal work to new

openings

Sports Field

Budget price from Newcastle Engineering to strip existing field and install new grass

sports field including new drainage and irrigation and tying-into existing

MechanicalBudget price from consultant Rocky Point Engineering, to install new mechanical

systems, renovate, convert and reuse existing mechanical systems where possible

ElectricalBudget price from consultant RB Engineering, to install new electrical systems, toreuse existing lights, power and data where possible

General Requirements & Fees

Wrap-up liability insurance, superintendent costs, own forces labour, general

conditions and construction management fees

ContingencyBuilding modification contingency to suit elementary students, playground

relocation, 6% construction contingency and3% design contingency

Consultant Fees & Soft Costs

Architectural, mechanical and electrical consultant fees and disbursements

r&Alternate Class'C' Estimate - Summary

March l,2ot4

32,116.58

25,000.00

737,796.82

24,000.00

45,000.00

600,000.00

200,000.00

1s0,000.00

238,771.87

313,058.82

233,660.12

Estimated Total Proiect cost 1'998'804'21

"Vt.r'1

Unitech construction Management LtdSuite 4oo - r53o 56th Street

Delta, BC V4L 248

r 604 943 8845 F 604 943 ogl2 w unitechcm.ca

Addendum G

Donna Reimer

From:Subject:

PS-07

Discovery Search MailboxFW: Feasibility for a DVR systems at the new Cedar Elementary

From: Pete SaboSent: Friday, January t0,2014 L:47 ?M

To: Brian HackwoodCc: Robert Lumsden; Brent SpohnSubject: Feasibility for a DVR systems at the new Cedar Elementary

Brian, Brent and I have been working with the Architect with respect to site development at the new CE and would like

to see if your staff could put together a high level feasibility and costing for a video surveillance system on the building

that would cover the site and perhaps even allow for a zoom in on the skate park, that would give the school betterability to supervise the site.

We may also be interested in an option for interior spaces as well.

This is at the idea stage and we have not discussed with LS orthe future principal.

Let's meet to discuss how we might proceed.

Tha nks,

Pete

ukeg-" ru*ru,&! e* c"e*Yrs€4€ry

'ji 6:l-i*a'Ll St H**r_EPete Sabo i L,1a;"*et*i +i Fi=rni-q *;:J ilper=i:+r:s*rre*t ?5tl74,=-52** i Offie* ?5* 75*-55=l i F=x ?5* 14:-525:;1ti !"i*i.reai=i'r Ar'*+i:+, i*asai-ii+, *C V*Fi 3K* ! ig,l*-+*,e?.bg,,:;C

Addendum H

Donna Reimer

Frorrr Discovery Search MailboxSubject FW: March 3 ACEAttachments: AFG Action Sheet _ 2014_tS Z4l2t411L5.docx; Cedar Elementary.doc; 2014_15 AFG -

Enhanced Facilities for Learning priorities 2502L4.pptx

Impoftance. High

BS-34

From: Brent SpohnSent: Friday, February 28,201410:16 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject; March 3 ACEfmpoftance: High

Hi Pete,

As discussed, your input and assistance with the attached are most appreciated.

Brent

THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 68

ACTION SHEET

TO: Business Committee

FROM: Pete Sabo, Director of Planning and OperationsBrent Spohn, Facilities Planning Supervisor

DATE: March 13,2014

SUBJECT: 2A14115 Annual Facility Grant (AFG)

REFERENCE:t 2014-15 AFG Plan - Enhanced Facilities for Learning Priorities

(0 pages attached).* Ministry of Education Policy Document: Annual Facility Grant (3

pages attached).* Schedule A - Ministry of Education 2013-14 Annual Facility

Grant Allocation (1 page attached).

BACKGROUND: Each year the Ministry of Education announces the amount of theAnnual Facility Grant, to be used by the Districts for projects thatmeet Ministry of Education Policy '1 .'l .100.

The Annual Facility Grant was introduced in 1988189 as a sharablecapital allowance supplementing the School Board's operatingbudget and funding projects required to extend facility life,especially re-roofi n g.

Several years ago, the Ministry changed the AFG process andincreased funding to $2.56 million. Annualtargeted funding for non-structural seismic mitigation was also approved. Projects up to $1.5million became eligible.

DISCUSSION: The Ministry of Education is expected to announce status quo AFGfunding on or about March 15,2A14. For 2A13-14 School District 68was allocated a total of $2,613,085. The AFG Allocation ScheduleA indicates that SD 68 received a capital potlion amounting to$'1,947,936 and an operating portion amounting to $665,149. Theoperating portion was reduced by a contribution of $71,266 towardthe continuing implementation of Capital Assef ManagementSerurbes. A further contribution to the Ministry initiative to upgradePL Net is anticipated.

It is expected that all school districts will have to provide the Ministrywith 2014-15 AFG plan and cash flow before any funding is

allocated.

C:\Users\donna.reimerLAppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary lnternet Files\Content.Outlook\QI9BWJML\AFG Action Sheet- )^4 A -1F' ,nir4,1 'l 4 14 rlarw

page 2

RECOMMENDATION:

Past practice suggests that the Ministry of Education wi, arsoadvise School Districts tfrri,' - "'.:. Existing AFG balances must be fully utilized.* once the operating porrion oitn"

"il";;il;is expended acertificate of Appr6var for the capitat porton oflhe arocationwill be granted.* A capitar byraw wi, be required before the certificate ofApproval is issued.A plan for the expenditure of this anticipated AFG funding has beendeveloped considering the iof f o*ing,* Priority support for the Ten year Enhanced Facitities forLearning ptan.t' High priority District wide annuar.programs, inctuding re_roofing,^ flooring and energy management.** Comptetion ol:_"!9ted hish

.priorlly AF.c. grojects, inctuding. So.g supporting educatio"nripiogrr* initiatives.* Funding in support of initiativ&'to reduce vandarism.r" :.TX?ff[J tlflfiffi;;;' unroreseen

",",g"nr projects

lit:r:l; below summarizes proposed spendins by Ministry AFG

# MINISTRYAFG CATEGORYBUDGET % OF BUDGET1

z3

46

o

7

oo

10

11

Mechanical System UpgradesElectrical System UpgradesFacility UpgradeLoss Prevention projectsFunctional ImprovementsTechnology lnfrastructure [_lnore"teeSite UpgradesDisabled AccessAsbestos AbatementHealth and Safety UpgradesSite Servicing

TOTAL ALLOCATED BUDGETEMERGENT PROJECTS AND CONTINGENCYCAMS CONTRIBUTIONTOTAL ANTICPATED FUNDING

$750,000.00

$1ss,000.00$15,000.00

$909,000.00

$13,000.00

$215,000.00

$45,000.00

$210,000.00$2s,000.00

$6500.00$12,500.00

$.00

32.13%5.70o/o

0.64%38.95%

0.56%

9.21%

1.93%9.00%1.07%

0.28%0.54%O.O0o/o

$207,819.00

$71,266.00$2,613,085.00

That the Business committee recommends to the Board ofEducation that the 2a14-15 Annuar Facirity Grant pran in the varueof $2,013,08S be approved.

TO:

FROM:

DATE:

SUBJECT:

THE BOARD OF EDUCATTON OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 68

ACTION SHEET

The Board of Education

Pete Sabo, Director of Planning and Operations

March 5,2014

Conversion of Cedar Secondary to Cedar Elementary

BACKGROUND:

At the June 26,2013, Regular Board meeting, the.Bgard of Education took the following step inrelationtothe10-YearEnhancedFacilitiesforLedngPlan:

Approved a bytcrw to close Ceclctr Community'sicon,lary on June 30, 2013. ,,, ,.

At the Special Board Meeting o, o"t ,'Is,2013,rh";lldmotions were also pirr.a,

The Uoord-,^.::::*:n,t^ 1 ,/*1 ,4om^ g1[BR arr"*on1, ,,r;*r1 ;." to use as a guide.for the revisioning of cedar sbcon{4ry.

^oy Seprymt", isin i io:r[;;op';", hetd by K 4BRArchitects. There::rtere'approximatn$ so puopta in attendanci i;;t;d;"g trustees, schooldistrictfficials andpACiepreserutatiies. ' ,,,..,

,, ,, , ,

That the ao*'i'$earcltigtit;ods.chool-Disrric:r 68lNanaiio,-Ladysmith) receives theSeptember 1 3, 20]3,.Cedai',School Conieision' Visioning W_r;iti;; n p*, prepared byKMBRArchitectsPlanners rnc. and,use the report as a guidef;;pTr;;i",gpurposes ro

,,,ihat the Boarcr ,f {!"r!::zn of schoor. oiii;r't 68 (Nanaimo-Ladysntith) follow itsPro'licy/Proceduie No--40!5 for,,appointing a sch'ool consrruction committeefor the newCedai Elementarv Schd6l. "

-,.-

Staff had a vision sissign, 1

vision document was prepared and have been working with the architectteam, ha-v'e ioni-retj a sehooi construCtion committee, have had six meetings with the schoolconstruction commif.tee, have a team of sub-consultants, have developed the plans to a point ofschematic design, have hired alonstruction cost consultant to provid! pricing, did a detailedgeotechnical site drainage review, and recently met with the s&ool construction commiftee andreviewed the scope development to date by the sub-consultants for the building and site and the costingas presented.

DISCUSSION:

Staff have been working with the principal designate, cathalwalsh, the school construction committeeand senior staff from Learning Services to develop the plans as attached.

The plan has been linked to the vision in as much as it reflects the nature of support for arts focusedspaces and planning developed in lock step with the attached program planning document (attached).

The plan also has space for leaning communities which are clusters of classrooms around acollaboration space (as indicated on the plan).

c:\users\doma.reimer\appdataUocal\rnicrosoft\q,indows\temporary ,ntemet files\content.outlook\qigbwjml\cedar elernentary.doc

Staff has developed the plan to an openingcapacity, approximately, to the District enrolments provided

by Learning Services. There is further growth available in the building by altering additional spaces.

There is also the ability to use portables. Staff, at this time, have no plans to relocate the four portables

that currently at Cedar.

RECOMMBNDATION:

Staff recommend the following:

That the Business Committee recommends to the Board of the following:

l. That the program planning document be development;

2. That the plan for the conversion, as endorsed for frr lopment; and

3. That the music room, art room and a foodsclassrooms in support of the

divisions)

c:\users\donna.reimer\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary intemet files\content.outlook\qi9bwjml\cedar elementary.doc