CEE Economic Growth & Development
Fall Semester, 2014
Lecture 7. Economic Growth:
The Role of Technological Progress
• The Solow model: Deriving steady state
• The Solow model and technological progress
• Growth accounting
Class Outline
The Vicious Circle of Poverty
GDP
Low savings
Scarce investment
capital
Scarce jobs,
Poor capital
Low output and
income
POVERTY
Breaking the Cycle
GDP
Better
institutions
Investment
capital
Better jobs,
Technology
Higher output
ECONOMIC
GROWTH
Solow-Swan Model of Economic Growth(1956)
Overview
Production function
• Diminishing returns to factor inputs
GDP per capita
( ) ( )( , )Y F K L
,1
( )
t t t
t t
t t
Y K KF F
L L L
y f k
y k
Diminishing Returns to Factor Inputs
( )y f k k
Implication: Countries
with small capital stock
are more productive =>
grow faster
Output per capita
Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation
Increase in capital stock (K)
Investments of firms
Savings of households provide investment funds to firms
s - exogenous savings rate
New additions
to the capital stock
Replacement of the
worn-out capital
(depreciation)
1
1
(1 )
(1 )
t t t
t t t
K I K
K sY K
Net investment = Total savings – Replacement of the depreciated capital
K sY K
Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation (Cont.)
Increase in capital stock (K)
Investments of firms
New additions
to the capital stock
Replacement of the
worn-out capital
(depreciation)
K sY K
• If capital stock is growing
• If capital stock is shrinking
• Break-even investment
sY K
sY K
sY K
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500
y
k
y k
i s k
k
Steady State Level of Capital
0 0I K K k
The economy would grow as long as
*k
*y
( )sf k k
Steady state capital (k*)
and output (y*) per capita
The Solow-Swan Model: Steady State
Steady state: the long-run equilibrium of the economy
•Savings are just sufficient to cover the depreciation of the capital stock
N!B! Savings rate is a fraction of wage, thus is bounded by the interval [0, 1]
In the long run, capital per worker reaches its steady state for an exogenous s
Increase in s leads to higher capital per worker and higher output per capita
Output grows only during the transition to a new steady state (not sustainable)
Economy will remain in the steady state (no further growth)
Economy which is not in the steady state will go there => Convergence
Government policy response?
The Solow-Swan Model: Numerical Example
0.5 0.5( , )Y F K L K L
0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5
;
Y K L K
L L L
K Yk y
L L
Production function
Production function in per capita terms
GDP per capita:
Savings rate:
Depreciation rate:
Initial stock of capital per worker:
y k
30%s
10%
0 4k
Year k y i c δk Δk
1 4
2
…
Consumption: C = (1-s)Y
Consumption per capita C/Y = c
Steady state capital/labor ration:
2*
2
ss k k k
The Solow-Swan Model: Numerical Example (Cont.)
The Solow-Swan Model: Convergence to Steady State
N!B! Regardless of , if two economies have the same s, δ, N, they will
reach the same steady state
0k
• If countries have the same steady state, poorest countries grow faster
•Not much convergence worldwide
Different countries have different institutions and policies
• Conditional convergence: comparison of countries with similar savings rates
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500
y
k
y
i
k
Solow Model: Convergence to Steady State
Convergence to steady state
*k
Solow Model: Increase in Savings Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500
y
k
• Savings rate increases from 30 % to 40 %
• Economy moves to a new steady state => Higher capital and output per capita
y
k
i
newi
*k*
newk
*y
*
newy
What effect would
have increase in δ on
the steady state?
Source: Mankiw (2009)
Log income per capita in 1960 (100=1996)
World Wide Convergence
Changes
in Log
income
per capita
in 1960 -
1990
The Golden Rule Level of Capital
Increasing savings rate means less present consumption
What is the optimal savings rate?
* * * maxc k k
N!B! Optimal savings
rate maximizes
consumption per capita
The Solow-Swan Model: Population Growth
Labor force is growing at a constant rate n =10%
( , )t t tY F K L
( )k sy n k
• Per capita capital stock is affect by investment, depreciation, and population growth
2*
2( )
( )
ss k n k k
n
Steady state:
• Population growth increases Y (level effect)
• Population growth reduces k* and y*
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500
y
k
Solow-Swan Model: Population Growth (Cont.)
y k
( )n k
i s k
*k
*y
( )newn k
*
newk
*
newy
Economies with high rates of population growth will have lower GDP per capita
Government policy response?
N!B! Sustainable
economic growth
still remains
unexplained
The Role of Technological Progress
• Technological change, increase in factor productivity
Larger output with given quantities of capital and labor
( , )Y F K A L Effective labor
( , , )Y F K L A
How does technological progress translates into larger output?
• State of technology (A)
Labor-augmenting technological progress
• A as labor efficiency
• TP reduced number of workers needed to produce the same output
• TP increases output using the same number of workers
The Solow-Swan Model with Technological Progress
• Technology is improving every year at the exogenous rate (g)
Production function: GDP per effective labor
( ) ( ) ( )( , , )Y F K L A
1t t
t
A Ag
A
( , )
t t
t t t t
Y F K A L
Y KF
A L A L
The Solow-Swan Model with Technological Progress (Cont.)
• From GDP per effective labor to the GDP per capita?
' '
( , )
( )
t t
t t t t
t t
Y F K A L
Y KF
A L A L
y f k
'( )t tt t t
t t t
Y Ky A F A f k
L A L
GDP per
effective
labor
Capital per
effective labor
• We are interested in GDP per capita
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500
y’
k’
' 'y k
( )n g k
' 'i s k
'*k
'*y
Steady state: Constant levels of capital and output per effective worker
The Solow-Swan Model with Technological Progress (Cont.)
The Solow-Swan Model: Technological Progress (Cont.)
• Capital and output per effective worker are constant in steady state
• What about per capita variables?
GDP per capita grows at the rate of technological progress (sustainable growth)
Balanced growth path: growth of variables at the same rate
•Per capita variables (capital, output and consumption) grow at a constant rate g
• Per effective labor variables are not growing in the steady state
* '
*( )ty A f k
N!B! Solow model explains 60 % of cross-country variation of the GDP per capita
by differences in savings rate and population growth
Growth Accounting
Real GDP per capita growth rate for Czech Republic in 2011 was 1.7 %
Real GDP per capita growth rate for the USA in 2012 was 2.2 %
How much of this growth is due to the factors’ accumulation and/or technology?
( , , )Y F A K L
Y A K L
Growth accounting: breakdown of observed growth of GDP into changes in
inputs and technology
A Y K L
Contribution of technology as a residual
Growth Accounting (Cont.)
• Capital (K) increases by 1 unit
What is the effect on output Y?
Marginal product of capita (MPK)
TE Capital stock increased by 10 units and MPK =0.1. What is the impact on
GDP?
unit
( , 1, ) ( , , )F A K L F A K L
( , , )Y F A K L
0.1 10 1Y
Growth Accounting (Cont.)
• Labor (L) increases by 1 unit
What is the effect on output Y?
Marginal product of labor (MPL)
TE Labor force increases by 10 units and MPK =0.3.
units
( , , 1) ( , , )F A K L F A K L
( , , )Y F A K L
0.3 10 3Y
Accounting for the increase in all components
How to account for the technological change?
Solow Residual: the left-over growth of output when growth attributed to the
changes in labor and capital is subtracted
( , , )
A K L
Y F A K L
Y MP A MP K MP L
Solow Residual
A K LMP A Y MP K MP L
Calculate it as a residual
Solow Residual (Cont.)
Where do we get marginal products of capital and labor?
L
L
Y
LF
K
K
Y
KFg
Y
Y Lk
A K LY MP A MP K MP L
Mathematical manipulations
• Transforming changes to growth rates
A K L
Y A K LMP MP MP
Y Y Y Y
GDP
growth
rate
Unobservable
technological
change (g)
Solow Residual (Cont.)
L
L
Y
LMP
K
K
Y
KMPg
Y
Y LK
Share of
capital in
output
Share of
labor in
output
K L
Y K Lg MP MP
Y Y Y
N!B! Key assumption: Factors of production are paid marginal product
• Wages and rental rate of capital reflect productivity of factors
Y K Lg
Y K L
Historical Factor Shares
Labor (2/3)
Capital (1/3)
Source: Acemoglu, 2009
Source: Mankiw, 2009