+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ceniza de Polvo de Algodon

Ceniza de Polvo de Algodon

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: edrey-nassier-salgado-cruz
View: 228 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Ceniza de algodón puzolan
Popular Tags:
40
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE MIXED COTTON DUST ASH Borvorn Israngkura Na Ayudhya 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, 10250, Thailand Email: [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract This paper presents the results of an extensive research program on the compressive, flexural and splitting tensile behavior of concrete mixed cotton dust (CD) ash. The concentration of dust particles less than 800 micron in diameter is used. The level of dosage was at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% by weight. Observed results indicated that concrete mixed CD ash has consistently led to improvement in strength performance. The ultimate compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength at 28 days was 32.92, 8.34 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Transcript

Appraisal of common contractual problems on public works projects in Thailand

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE MIXED COTTON DUST ASH

Borvorn Israngkura Na Ayudhya11Department of Civil Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, 10250, ThailandEmail: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract This paper presents the results of an extensive research program on the compressive, flexural and splitting tensile behavior of concrete mixed cotton dust (CD) ash. The concentration of dust particles less than 800 micron in diameter is used. The level of dosage was at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% by weight. Observed results indicated that concrete mixed CD ash has consistently led to improvement in strength performance. The ultimate compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength at 28 days was 32.92, 8.34 and 4.82 N/mm2 respectively. The optimum CD ash dosage was at 10% by weight. As a result, when increasing the percentage replacement of CD ash, the porosity of concretes increased. The results showed that CD ash is eminently suitable for partial replacement of the cement in concrete to help in mitigating environmental pollution.

Keywords: Concrete, Cotton dust ash, Industrial waste,

IntroductionIndustrial wastes are unwanted wastes from an industrial operation which are hazardous since they are corrosive, reactive, ignitive and toxic hence leading to extensive pollution. In Thailand, the total cotton fiber production is estimated to be 351,000 tons per year, of which approximately 240 tones of cotton dust (micro dust, a non-saleable waste), is produced during yarn manufacturing process (Singhadeja, 2011) The problems associated with microdust have now assumed serious consideration. It pollutes the atmosphere and if not degraded properly leads to infectious diseases and release of foul odour. However, most of them are disposed off by burning which increase carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and add on to the global warming. Concrete is a material that is often seen as a potential place for wastes, because of its composite nature (a binder, water and aggregates) and because it is widely used. The application and use of unusual wasted materials in concrete have been widely studied for improving mechanical and durability of their composites and reduce the cement consumption (Vaiciukyniene et al., 2012; Kanning, 2013). Cordeiro et al. (2009) investigated the bagasse ashes which identified their high pozzolanic activity, attributed to the presence of amorphous silica in small particle size, with high surface area and low loss on ignition. Pedrozo (2008) reported that the utilization of 15% and 25% ratios of residual rice husk ashes in structural concrete for long life span on chloride environment exposition. Their products performances had decreased the cement consumption, had increased the mechanical and chemical resistances of Portland concrete and had reduced the consequent environmental impact in agriculture and construction areas. Similar, Rodrigo et al.(2008) found that concrete mixed with banana leaves ash produced a good performance in terms of the fresh state parameters and the mechanical behavior in the hardened mortar state. The compressive strength until 10% by weight banana leaves ash mortar mixture was nearly 25% higher than the reference sample and approximately 10% greater than that under tensile stress in bending on average. Regardless of all limitations that may exist, the utilization of cotton dust ash in concrete might be perceived as alternative material in a future.

Literature reviewCellulose is the most abundant organic polymer on Earth (Klemm et al., 2005). The cellulose and lignin content of cotton fiber is 90% and 33% respectively (Piotrowski and Carus, 2011). Burning lignin residue produces lignin residue ash that can be rich in silica and calcium. Lignin residue ash has been shown to have the potential to be used in concrete as a reactive supplementary cementitious material (SCM) to reduce concrete cement content as well as improve concrete quality (Ataie and Riding, 2014). However, use of lignin residue ash in concrete depends on its physical and chemical properties. Physical and chemical properties of lignin residue ash depend on the burning conditions and composition of lignin residue. (Galbe and Zacchi, 2012; Chiaramonti et al.,2012; Zhen et al., 2009).The main objectives of this paper are, firstly, is to assess the feasibility of the cotton dust ash as replacement for cement in concrete, and secondly, to evaluate the effect of cotton dust ash characteristics and mixture parameters on hardened properties of concrete. The effect of cotton dust ash characteristics on fresh concrete is not presented here and will be the object of further assessment in future works. In this investigation, the mechanical properties of the concrete mixed cotton dust ash are studied using compressive and flexural strength and splitting tensile strength as these are the fundamental parameters for strength design of concrete structural element. Materials and Methods Cement matrixOrdinary Portland cement corresponding to ASTM Type I cement with a specific gravity of 3.16 was used for all concrete mixtures. Coarse aggregates were a crushed granite with a maximum size of 16 mm and a specific gravity of 2.68. Natural siliceous river sand having a fineness modulus of 1.95 and a specific gravity of 2.54 was used as a fine aggregate. Both coarse and fine aggregates were batched in a saturated surface dry (SSD) conditions. The composition of cotton dust ash is shown in Table 1.Cotton dust ash The cotton dust ash used in this study is a waste material of cotton dust which results of the mechanical processing of raw cotton in the spinning process. The cotton dust was incinerated in special furnace at 800C. After that, cotton dust was held at targeted temperature for four hours before the furnace was turned off and cotton dust ash was then allowed to cool down naturally to room temperature. During the heating period, moisture in the specimens was allowed to escape freely. Then the surface dust was blown away. This dust is nothing but cotton dust ash powder. The variation of particle size distribution of cotton dust ash was verified by materisizer S long bed ver. 2.19 and the result was showed in Figure 1. It varies in the range of 200-700 micron. In figure 2 showed the picture of cotton dust ash.

Methods of mixingFor dispersion effect of the mixing materials, the one-third of cotton dust ash was firstly added into running mixer after concrete was well mixed. The mixing time was 3 min. Then, Two-third of cotton dust ash was secondly added gradually to running mixer. The mixing time continues for 3 min. The concrete specimens were casted in cylinders of 100 mm diameter and 200 mm height and prisms of 150150800 mm steel moulds for compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and three point load flexural strength tests. Two layers of placing mixed concrete into steel moulds were used, each layer being consolidated using a vibrating table. The specimens were demoulded approximately 24 hr after casting. The method of curing was immersion in water at 232 C until the age of testing. In order to minimize the affect of surface moisture to the strength of specimens, all specimens were placed out of water and put in the air dry for 24 hr prior to testing. Three test results were compared for obtaining the means value for any test. The mix proportions of binders are presented in Table 2.

Testing methodsCompressive strength, flexural and splitting tensile strength tests were carried out in accordance with ASTM C 39, ASTM C78 and ASTM C 496 respectively. In this study, the porosity of concrete was determined through the Vacuum Saturation method (Cabrera and Lynsdale, 1988). The measurements of concrete mixed CD ash porosity were conducted on 50 mm cubes. The specimens were placed in a desiccator under vacuum for at least 3 h, after which the desiccator was filled with de-aired, distilled water. In order to obtain fully dried, the specimens were dried in oven at 1003C for 24 hr. Each data point reflects the three test results. Porosity was calculated using the following equation: (1)where P = porosity (%); Wsat = weight in air of saturated sample;Wwat = weight in water of saturated sample and Wdry = weight of oven-dried sample.Figure 1. Cotton dust ash.Figure 2. Particle size distribution of CD ash.Table 1. Chemical composition and properties of cement and CD ash.Table 2. Mixture proportion of concrete mixed CD ash.

Test results and discussionCompressive strength The cylindrical specimens were tested for compressive strength test. The compressive strength of different CD ash replacement was presented in Table 3 for 3, 7, 14, 28 and 60 days. The compressive strength of concrete mixed cotton dust ash with 10% was 28.06 N/mm2 and 32.92 N/mm2 at 28 and 60 days respectively. It found that the value of strength at 28 days was 3.6% lower than control mix. However, at 60 days, the strength of concrete mixed cotton dust ash was 2.7% higher than the control mix (0% cotton dust ash). The compressive strength increased with blending percentage at corresponding values of curing period. This trend was pronounced for replacement levels up to 10% by weight. Higher content of cotton dust ash caused a loss in strength. This might due to an increase in cotton dust ash content which increased total surface area of cotton dust ash in the mixes. Therefore, further water dosage for attaining workability of mixtures was required. Figure 3 presented relative compressive strength data, defined compressive strength of cotton dust ash blended concrete to the strength of the plain concrete with the same content and cured to the same age. The cotton dust ash blending increased the relative strength at all ages. However, most pronounced was the increased in the first 7 days. This was due to a coarser cement hydrate at lower rate therefore produced lower early-age strengths as compared to finer cements made from the same clinker. Consequence, this declined the rate of increasing in early age strength. Addition, this might further due to the result of higher porosity due to less efficient packing of more coarsely ground cement. The reduction in volume of hydration products due to less favourable hydration rate was expected to result in a decrease in the early-age strength. Table 3. Compressive flexural and splitting strength test results.Figure 3. Compressive strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

Flexural strengthThe flexural strength of beam containing cotton dust ash reduced, as the replacement percentage increased (Table 3). The highest drop of flexural strength was observed when the content of cotton dust ash aboved 10% by weight. This might due to the poor quality of the interfacial bond of hydration of cement developed. Even, larger volumes of reactions products and the small cotton dust ash particles improve the particle packing density of the blended cement which leads to a reduced volume of larger pores and a more homogenous microstructure of the cement paste between interfacial zones. However, the results showed that partial cement replace by cotton dust ash did not have a significantly improved strength at early age, although the effect was pronounced only at later ages (60 days). Figure 4 revealed the flexural strength values of cotton dust ash blended concrete was lower than those of plain cement concrete at ages up to 28 days. At later age (60 days), the blended concretes have higher flexural strength than of the control concrete. However, it was noticed that the rate of increase of flexural strength was lower than compressive strength. The optimum dosage for flexure was at 10% of cotton dust ash. After increasing the volume percentage of cotton dust ash beyond the optimum value (10%), improper mixing of cotton dust took place due to balling effect of cotton dust ash. This increased the amount of vibrations required to remove air voids from the mix which caused the problem of bleeding and decreased flexural strength of the mix. Adding of cotton dust ash with cement provided less efficient particle packing due to the narrower particle size range as compared to the cement. Hence, only moderate contribution was given by the filler effect to early-age strength. Furthermore, blending by higher amounts of cotton dust ash put the strength of concrete at early ages in the more unfavourable position due to the diluting effect (Bui et al, 2005). This might not be compensated for by physical strength contribution, due to the significantly overlapping particle size distribution curve of cement and cotton dust ash. From this aspect, adding cotton dust ash higher than 10% appeared to be in a more disadvantage position. Figure 4. Flexural strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

Splitting tensile strengthThe splitting tensile results were shown in Table 3. The average splitting tensile strength increased as CD ash substitution increased. Similar to the compressive and flexural, strength of splitting tensile increased with time. However, the rate of increasing is different (figure 5). The splitting tensile strength of concrete mixed CD ash was in the range of 1.92-4.82 N/mm2. It was further found that 10% of CD ash replacement gave the highest splitting tensile strength when it compared with splitting tensile strength of specimens mixed with 10%, 15% and 20% of CD ash replacement. In this regard, concrete contained 10% of CD ash replacement, developed averagely 58.85% of the 28 days strength in 7 days in comparison with 57.20% for normal concrete. This might due to thermal resistivity of CD ash which retained the heat of hydration and increased the cement reactions at later age. Addition, by using 20% CD ash as cement replacement, the splitting tensile strength decreased. This might due to the amount of cement was replaced, hydration process and CD ash activity. From the results obtained in Table 3, Mixture of CD ash can be used in the production of normal weight concrete. Substitution of the mixture should not be more than 10% of replacement level for the best result in the concrete production for concrete structures.Figure 5. Splitting tensile strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

The correlations between ratio of tensile to compressive and ratio of tensile to flexural. The ratio of splitting tensile strength to compressive strength (ftsp/fc) as a function of cylinder compressive strength of concrete fc by means of regression analysis of experimental data from the literature (Gardner, 1990; Gardner et al., 1988; Imam et al.,1999). In figure 6 and figure 7 showed the ratio of splitting tensile to compressive and splitting tensile to flexural. It found that the ratio between tensile and compressive was in the range of 0.092-0.146 while the ratio between tensile and flexural was in the range of 0.292-0.607. The ratio of the two strengths (ftsp/fc) is strongly affected by the level of the compressive strength fc. This ratio decreases with increasing compressive strength at a decreasing rate. This finding can be explained by the fact that the increase in the splitting tensile strength ftsp occurs at a much smaller rate compared to the increase of compressive strength. The result is in agreement with various researchers (Zain, et al., 2002; Aroglu et al., 2002; Li and Ansari, 2000; Komlo, 1970). Therefore, it was classified as low strength concrete.Figure 6. The ratio of tensile and compressive strength. Figure 7. The ratio of tensile and flexural strength.

The correlations between the porosity and CD ash It found from figure 8 that the porosity of concrete mixed CD increased when the content of CD ash increased. The compressive strength of concrete mixed CD ash was shown to be a function of porosity and age. The porosity of concrete mixed CD ash decreased as age of specimens increased. This might due to the amount of hydration of cement gel increased (Chindaprasirt, and Rukzon,2008). However, the increment of decreasing in porosity was lesser than the volume of CD ash void. It was further found from figure 9 that there was slightly change in workability when CD ash content increased. An increase of volume fraction of CD ash caused the amount for water increased which was due to water absorption by CD ash. Addition, the result of higher porosity due to less efficient packing of more coarsely material (cotton dust ash). In this studied, the measurement of the pore structure of cement based materials has proved to be extremely difficult in cement-based materials, this was due to special character of the hydration products formed (Day and Marsh, 1988). Hence, the results obtained will depend not only on the measuring principle but also on the drying method used prior to the porosity measurements (Vodak et al., 2004).

ConclusionsBased on the experimental results of this study the following conclusion can be drawn:1. The strength of material gradually increased as cotton dust ash dosage increased. However, introducing 5% by weight of cotton dust ash dosage in mixing dose was given the highest compressive strength in early age (28 days). Afterward, the concrete mixed CD ash for 10% was the highest compressive strength. The replacement of cotton dust ash had a small impact on the compressive strength of concrete mixes. This was attributed to the additional cement content which was introduced into the mix. The flexural strength of beams containing cotton dust ash, as the replacement percentage increases due to the poor quality of the interfacial bond developed between cement and cotton dust ash. The maximum compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength on 28 days curing period was 28.71, 6.37 and 3.28 N/mm2 respectively. 2. The increase in porosity was clearly attributed to the porous cement paste covering the surface of each mix. As the percentage of the cotton dust ash replacement increased, the porosity increased. This was more evident when higher percentages of cotton dust ash were used in the mixtures, due to the increased amount of cement surfaces. All mixes were classified as medium permeable and the permeability values of all mixes, independently of the percentage of cotton dust ash.3. It found that ratio of splitting tensile to compressive and the ratio of splitting tensile to flexural was in range of 0.092-0.146 while the ratio between tensile and flexural was in the range of 0.292-0.607. This ratio decreases with increasing compressive strength at a decreasing rate. 4. According to mechanical tests, CD ash has showed significant improvement in compressive flexural and splitting tensile strength at later age (28 days upward).5. The use of CD ash as cement replacement material has proven to be beneficial not only for the obvious environmental benefits and saving raw materials but also in terms of the mechanical improvements of composites. As a result and in addition to these added values of using CD ash in concrete structures, a probable decrease of the final cost of concrete could also be in sighted.

ReferenceAmerican Society for. Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2004). C39 / C39M - 12a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 2, Philadelphia.1022p.

American Society for. Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2004). C78 / C78M - 10e1 Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 2, Philadelphia,1022p.American Society for. Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2004). C496 / C496M - 11 Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 2, Philadelphia,1022p.

Aroglu, E.; Girgin, C.; and Aroglu, N., (2002). Re-evaluation of ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength for normal-strength concrete. Journal of Ready Mix Concrete., 58-63. (in Turkish)Ataie F., and Riding, K. (2014). Use of bioethanol byproduct for supplementary cementitious material production. Constr Build Mater., 51(31):8996.Bui, D.D., Hu.J and Stroeven, P. (2005). Particle size effect on the strength of rice husk ash blended gap-graded Portland cement concrete. Cem and Con Comp., 27, 357-366.Cabrera, J.G., and Lynsdale, C.J. (1988). A new gas permeameter for measuring the permeability of mortar and concrete. Mag Con Res., 40,177182. Chiaramonti, D., Prussi, M., Ferrero, S., Oriani, L., Ottonello, P., and Torre, P. (2012). Review of pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic ethanol production, and development of an innovative method. Biomass Bioenergy., 46,2535.Chindaprasirt, P., Rukzon, S. (2008). Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk as fly ash mortar. Constr Build Mater.,22,1601-1606.Cordeiro G.C., Toledo, F.R.D., and Fairbairn, E.M.R. (2008). Caracterizao de cinza do bagao de cana-de-acar para emprego como pozolana em materiais cimentcios. Quim Nova., 32(1),82-86Day, R.L., and Marsh, B.K. (1988). Measurement of porosity in blended cement pastes. Cem and Con Res., 18,63-73.Galbe, M., and Zacchi, G. (2012). Pretreatment: the key to efficient utilization of lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy.,46,70-78.Gardner, N. J., Sau, P. L., and Cheung, M. S. (1988). Strength Development and Durability of Concretes Cast and Cured at 0 C, ACI Materials Journal.,85(6),529-536.Gardner, N. J., (1990). Effect of Temperature on the Early-Age Properties of Type I, Type III, and Type I/Fly Ash Concretes. ACI Materials Journal., 87(1),68-78.Kanning RC. (2013) Utilizao da cinza de folha de bananeira como adio em argamassas de cimento Portland. (Thesis). Brasil: Universidade Federal do Paran; 194p.Klemm, Dieter; Heublein, Brigitte; Fink, Hans-Peter; Bohn, Andreas (2005). Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material. Anqew Chem Int Ed Enql.,44(22),3358-3393. Cite uses deprecated parameters (help)Imam, M.,Vandewalle, L., and Mortelmans, F. (1999). Indirect Tensile Strength of Very High Strength Concrete, Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Utilization of High Strength/High Performance Concrete, volume 2, 1999; Sandefjord, Norway, p.1114-1121.Li, Q., and Ansari, F., (2000). High-strength concrete in uniaxial tension. ACI Materials Journal.,97(1),49-57.Komlo, K., (1970). Comments on the long-term tensile Strength of plain concrete. Mag Concrete Res., 22(73),232-238.Pedrozo, E.C., (2008). Estudo da utilizao da cinza da casca do arroz residual em concretos estruturais: uma anlise da durabilidade aos cloretos. Brasil: Dissertao de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 143p.Piotrowski, S., and Carus, M. (2011). Multi-criteria evaluation of lignocellulosic niche crops for use in biorefinery processes. nova-Institut GmbH, Hrth, Germany.Rodrigo, C.K., Kleber, F.P., Mariana, O.G.P., Bragana, M.M., and Bonato, J., and Santos, C.M. (2014). Banana leaves ashes as pozzolan for concrete and mortar of Portland cement. Constr Build Mater., 54,460-465.Singhadeja, C. (2011). Thai Textile Statistics. Thailand Textile Institute (THTI). Bangkok.Thailand. Vaiciukyniene D., Vaitkevicius V., Kantautas A., and Sasnauskas V. (2012). Utilization of byproduct waste silica in concretebased materials. Mater Res., 15,561-567.Vodak, F., Trtik, K. and Kapickova, O., et al. (2004). The effectof temperature on strength porosity relationship for concrete. Constr Build Mater.,18, 529-534.Zain, M. F. M., Mahmud, H. B., Ilham, A., and Faizal, M. (2002). Prediction of splitting tensile of high-performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Res., 32,1251-1258.Zheng, Y., Pan, Z., and Zhang, R. (2009). Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. International Journal of Agricultural and Biology Engineering.,2(3),5168.

Figure 1. Cotton dust ash

Figure 2. Particle size distribution of CD ash

Figure 3. Compressive strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

Figure 4. Flexural strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

Figure 5. Splitting tensile strength of concrete mixed CD ash.

Figure 6. The ratio of splitting tensile to compressive strength.

Figure 7. The ratio of splitting tensile to flexural strength.

Figure 8. The porosity and content of CD ash.

Figure 9 The relationship between slump and porosity of concrete mixed CD ash.

Table 1. Chemical composition and properties of cement and CD ash.

Composition (%)CementCotton dust ash

CaO65.424.2

SiO219.460.4

Al2O34.810.7

Fe2O33.41.5

MgO2.83.2

SO33.0-

Na2O0.2-

K2O--

Loss on ignition1-

Table 2. Mixture proportion of concrete mixed CD ash.

Designation of the mixCD ash (kg/m3)Sand (kg/m3)Aggregate (kg/m3)Water (kg/m3)Cement (kg/m3)

CDA-00.0772880215430.0

CDA-521.5772880215408.5

CDA-1043.0772880215387.0

CDA-1564.5772880215365.5

CDA-2086.0772880215344.0

Table 3. Compressive flexural and splitting strength test results.

Compressive strength of Concrete mixed CD ash (N/mm2)

CD ash (%)3 days7 days14 days28 days60 days

018.1619.7325.1529.0732.04

516.0919.5724.5628.7132.41

1015.6819.1224.3128.0632.92

1515.4418.7623.3226.6231.42

2011.4617.5422.3525.9131.17

Flexural strength of Concrete mixed CD ash (N/mm2)

CD ash (%)3 days7 days14 days28 days60 days

04.384.665.776.398.11

54.134.465.486.378.21

103.934.145.286.198.34

153.753.945.105.726.98

203.593.644.745.146.88

Splitting tensile strength of Concrete mixed CD ash (N/mm2)

CD ash (%)3 days7 days14 days28 days60 days

01.922.222.803.494.41

51.832.092.633.284.47

101.641.922.273.054.82

151.491.732.173.044.24

201.051.291.562.654.16

1


Recommended