Date post: | 20-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | daniel-blair |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
1
Texas Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Update
for
Children’s Hospital Association of Texas
October 24, 2006Anne Dunkelberg, Associate Director
900 Lydia Street - Austin, Texas 78702Phone (512) 320-0222 – fax (512) 320-0227 - www.cppp.org
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
2
Texans and Health Insurance
US Census Bureau Statistics (March 2006 CPS):
• Approximately 5.5 million Texans uninsured in 2005–24.6% of Texans of all ages were uninsured (versus 15.7% U.S.)
–26.9% of Texans under age of 65 were uninsured
• Another three million Texans covered by Medicaid or CHIP (i.e., generally not insured through private coverage)
• Why are so many Texans uninsured?
Low percentage of employer-sponsored insurance (ESI)–8% below national average for < age 65 (54.5%, vs. 62.8%)–10.4% below national average for < age 18
–Only 12.0% of Texans below poverty have ESI
• Approximately 83% of Texas Medicaid recipients are below poverty (i.e., most are unlikely to be insured w/o Medicaid)
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
Texas’ Uninsured by Income, 2005
Income, % of Poverty
Uninsured
(millions)
As % of Group Max income, Family of 4
All 5.5 24.6%
<100% 1.55 42.2% $20,000
100-200% 1.92 37.5% $40,000
200-300% 1.04 26.5% $60,000
300-400% 0.446 14.8% $80,000
400-500% 0.172 9.4% $100,000
Above 500% 0.368 7.1% More than $100K
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
4
How Does Immigration Factor In?
• Immigrants are NOT the primary cause of Texas’ last-place ranking – Census Bureau reported 2.4 million non-citizens
(includes both legal residents and undocumented persons); 1.3 million of them are uninsured (54.5% of non-citizens)
– BUT! If you removed non-citizens from the equation, Texas would still be tied with New Mexico for the worst uninsured rate at 20.6% uninsured (4.2 million), even if you left the non-citizens in the other state’s counts
• Without immigrants, New Mexico’s rate would drop to 18.9%
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
5
Texas Health Insurance Stats:What They Tell Us About the Need for Outreach?
Texas Children who are Uninsured, 2004-05 – U.S. Census
All incomes, under age 19 (0-18*; 2-year average 2004-05 Census CPS)
20.4% 1.367 million
< 200% FPL; under age 19 (0-18; 2-year average 2004-05 Census CPS)
28% of <200%;
13.4% of all kids
919,000
•In other words, 2/3 of uninsured Texas children are below 200% of the federal poverty line, despite Medicaid and CHIP.
•Texas is home to an estimated 230,000 undocumented kids, and another 160,000 legal immigrant (LPR) children under age 18 (Pew Hispanic Center).
•But, the LPR kids can participate in CHIP. •Clearly, undocumented children are just a small part of our uninsured problem
•At least half of our uninsured kids (~689,000) could enroll in Medicaid or CHIP!
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
6
Texas Medicaid: Who it Helps
Children, 1,784,302
Disabled, 360,974
Elderly, 362,953
Poor Parents, 60,445
TANF Parent, 25,411
Maternity, 97,161
August 2006, HHSC data.
Total enrolled 6/1/2006: 2,644,167
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
7
Income Caps for Texas Medicaid and CHIP, 2006
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
PregnantWomen
Newborns Age 1-6 Age 6-18 TANFparent of
2, noincome
WorkingParent of
2
SSI (agedor
disabled)
LongTermCare
CHIP
Mandatory Optional
$22,078/yr
$30,710/yr $30,710/yr
185% 185%133%
$16,600
100%$2,256 $3,696
13.6% 22.3%74%
$7,476
222%
$21,708$33,200
200%
Income Limit as Percentage of Federal Poverty IncomeAnnual Income is for a family of 3,
except Individual Incomes shown for SSI and Long Term Care
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
8Medicaid in Texas: Who it HelpsMedicaid: As of September 2006, 2.6 million Texans were enrolled in Medicaid:•1.75 million were children
–about 96,000 of these children, or 5.5%, were receiving disability-related Medicaid (98% of these on SSI)
–about 13,100 were pregnant teens (0.8% of the kids; 0.5% of all Medicaid)
–125,600 in TANF cash assistance families ( 7.2% of the kids; 4.8% of total caseload)
–OTHER 1.5 MILLION predominantly in WORKING POOR FAMILIES
• About 1.2 million worker-headed families, • Other 20% are headed by disabled parents; living on child
support from non-custodial parent, or both)
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
9
Medicaid in Texas: Who it HelpsMedicaid: As of September 2006, 2.6 million Texans were enrolled in Medicaid:895,000 were adults:
– 691,000 (79% of the adults) were elderly or disabled. Adults on SSI account for 60% of the aged and disabled recipients
– Other adults: 98,600 maternity coverage; 25,500 TANF parents (1.0% of total caseload);
– NOTE: there are fewer than 85,000 total poor parents on Texas Medicaid. 59,400 either TMA (Transitional Medicaid Assistance) or parents who are at or below TANF income, but not receiving TANF cash assistance
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP):� as of September 1, 2003 — 507,259 children � as of October 1, 2006 — 300,685 (drop of 206,574, or 41%)
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
10
Texas Child Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment (Jan. 2002-October 2006)
1,600,000
1,700,000
1,800,000
1,900,000
2,000,000
2,100,000
2,200,000
Jan-0
2
May
-02
Sep-0
2
Jan-0
3
May
-03
Sep-0
3
Jan-0
4
May
-04
Sep-0
4
Jan-0
5
May
-05
Sep-0
5
Jan-0
6
May
-06
Sep-0
6
Ch
ildre
n E
nro
lled
5,800,000
5,900,000
6,000,000
6,100,000
6,200,000
6,300,000
6,400,000
Ch
ild P
op
ula
tio
n
Source: Enrollment from Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Texas State Demographer's 0-17 Population Estimates
9/03: 2,150,543
10/06: 2,020,710
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
11
Texas Child Medicaid Enrollment(February 2001-October 2006)
now:1,720,025
1,000,000
1,300,000
1,600,000
1,900,000
Feb-0
1
Jun-
01
Oct-0
1
Feb-0
2
Jun-
02
Oct-0
2
Feb-0
3
Jun-
03
Oct-0
3
Feb-0
4
Jun-
04
Oct-0
5
Feb-0
5
Jun-
05
Oct-0
5
Feb-0
6
Jun-
06
Oct-0
6
Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Simplified Enrollment begins
High: 1,838,239
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
12
Texas CHIP Enrollment(May 2000-Oct. 2006)
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
May
-00
Sep-0
0
Jan-0
1
May
-01
Sep-0
1
Jan-0
2
May
-02
Sep-0
2
Jan-0
3
May
-03
Sep-0
3
Jan-0
4
May
-04
Sep-0
4
Jan-0
5
May
-05
Sep-0
5
Jan-0
6
May
-06
Sep-0
6
Source: All figures from Texas Health and Human Services Commission;Compares most recent month with September 2003
Highest, 5/02: 529,271 9/03:
507,259
10/06: 300,685
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
13
CHIP Caseloads: Now and Projected
2006 2007
September 2003 actual caseload 507,259
October 2006 actual caseload 300,685
decline, 9/03 to 10/06 (-40.7%) (-206,574)
HHSC 2/05 enrollment projection, if 12-month eligibility restored
386,110 467,404
SB 1 funded caseload, traditional CHIP (6 month renewal)*
344,750 351,132
Additional caseload, perinatal coverage 17,425 47,498
Total, SB 1 projected CHIP caseload, traditional & perinatal CHIP
362,175 398,630
*Rider 57 HHSC (SB 1) requires agency to request more $$ for CHIP from LBB if needed for enrollment and benefits.•HHSC Budget Request for 2008-09 would allow enrollment to grow to 339,037 in 2009.
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
14Recent Declines in Texas Children’s Medicaid Enrollment
December 2005
October 2006
Decline, December to October
State total 1,838,239 1,720,025 -118,214 -6.4%
Bexar 139,682 134,021 -6,478 -4.6%
Cameron 64,339 64,212 -1,347 -2.1%
Dallas 182,954 172,030 -12,900 -7.1%
El Paso 98,319 91,162 -9,054 -9.2%
Harris 316,896 301,042 -24,905 -7.9%
Hays 4,953 5,178 155 3.1%
Tarrant 97,908 91,296 -8,425 -8.6%
Travis 52,667 50,835 -3,400 -6.5%
Webb 36,473 33,347 -3,727 -10.2%
Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
15
Children’s Medicaid declines• Drop of over 99,000 children statewide from December 2005 to
April 2006 caused alarm.• As of April, Travis and Hays showing much greater loss since
December than statewide loss (-11.4% and -16.8%, vs. -5.4% statewide).
• However, caseloads improved June to September, and Travis and Hays county child enrollment rebounded by much larger margin than the statewide growth.
• Then dropped 35,607 from August to September; -28,670 from Sept. to Oct.
• Net decline since December now -118,214.• Travis and Hays counties now doing BETTER than state
average (Due to extra State attention to them?).• Of concern and unexplained: Webb and El Paso counties drop
more than Travis (-10.2, -9.2%)
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
16
Adult Medicaid Trends - Statewide
Dec-05 Sept.-06 Dec 05 to Sept. 06
Change
Aged and Disabled
687,177 710,131 22,954 3.3%
Cash Assistance
31,876 25,527 -6,349 -19.9%
Maternity 93,617 98,614 4,997 5.3%
Other Parents
64,656 59,412 -5,244 -8.1%
Total 877,326 894,585 17,259 2.0%
•CAVEAT: Travis and Hays County Medicaid enrollment have DECLINED for adults from December 2005 to September 2006.
•Points to problems with the IE&E pilot and TIERS
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
17
Adult Medicaid Trends – Travis CountyDec-05 Sept.-06 Dec 05 to
Sept. 06Change
Aged and Disabled
17,435 16,846 -589 -3.4%
Cash Assistance
4,089 4,352 263 6.4%
Maternity 1828 1,967 139 7.6%
Other Parents
1,692 1,596 -96 -5.7%
Total 25,044 24,761 -283 -1.1%
• From December 2005 to July 2006, Statewide Adult Medicaid enrollment grew by 1%, but Travis County enrollment DECLINED for adults, including aged and disabled and maternity (-6.5% overall)
• Enrollment since then shows some recovery; Statewide growth 2% since December, but Travis County enrollment dropped -1.1%
• Points to problems with the IE&E pilot and TIERS.
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
18
Adult Medicaid Trends – Hays CountyDec-05 Sept.-06 Dec 05 to
Sept. 06Change
Aged and Disabled
1,956 1,658 -298 -15.2%
Cash Assistance
348 456 108 31.0%
Maternity 261 273 12 4.6%
Other Parents
119 106 -13 -10.9%
Total 2,684 2,493 -191 -7.1%
•From Dec. 2005 to Sept. 2006, Statewide Adult Medicaid enrollment grew by 2%, but Hays County enrollment DECLINED for aged and disabled and non-TANF parents (-7.1% overall)
•Hays County decline as of July was -10.1% (vs. +1.1% statewide), so some improvement over summer.
• Points to problems with the IE&E pilot and TIERS
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
19
Recent Declines in Texas CHIP Enrollment
December 2005
September 2006
Decline, December to September
State total 322,898 291,530 -31,368 -9.7%
Bexar 20,915 18,443 -2,472 -11.8%
Cameron 7,814 7,770 -44 -0.6%
Dallas 33,325 30,470 -2,855 -8.6%
El Paso 13,628 11,571 -2,057 -15.1%
Harris 65,465 56,211 -9,254 -14.1%
Hays 1,489 1,342 -147 -9.9%
Tarrant 19,754 19,039 -715 -3.6%
Travis 8,550 8,847 297 3.5%
Webb 5,279 5,153 -126 -2.4%
Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
20
CHIP Declines• September ’06 county numbers show slight
improvement in SOME counties, while most remain well below December ’05 enrollment.
• Renewal rates ARE improved: back above 70% for June-Sept.-- compared to 50%-57% from January through May .
• However, thru September statewide enrollment continues to drop, new enrollment is low. Thus, too early to claim recovery trend for CHIP.
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
21
What Texas Spendsand how much more it would cost to “Be Average”
State "Own Source" Budget, 2006-07: $90 Billion
All Other, $7.0 b, 8%
Business/Econ Devel., $9.2 b, 10%
Criminal Justice, $8.3 b, 9%
Other Health & Human Services,
$5.1 b, 6%
Medicaid, $14.1 b, 16%
Higher Education,
$17.7 b, 20%
K-12 Education, $28.6 b, 31%
"Own Source" = Excludes Federal Funds
If State Spending per Texan were equal to the U.S. Average,
this budget would
increase to $142
Billion
Source: LBB Fiscal Size Up 2006-07; NASBO State Expenditure Report 2004 (Jan 2006)
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
22
Higher Ed: $17.7 $13.5 (tax swap)
HHS: $19.2 Higher Ed: $19.4
Prisons: $8.3 HHS: $22.8
Eco. Dev.: $9.2
Prisons: $8.7
Eco. Dev: $9.2
Other: $8.1
Other: $7.0
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
2006-07 Spending 2008-09 Needs 2008-09 Revenue
$94 billion
$116 billion $114 billion
$2.1 (tax swap)
$6.6 b ending balance
$8 b rev growth
GR Dedicated: $1.3 bRainy Day Fund: $3.3 b
2008-09 Budget Will Be Very TightState Own-Source Spending and Revenue
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
23
HHS Needs in 2008-09 “Above Baseline” Requests
• Restore 10% Cuts: HHSC $72 million/550 workers; Aging & Disability, $112 million/298 workers; Family & Protective Services, $40 million/Eliminate Prevention services; State Health Services, $236 million/693 workers; Assistive & Rehabilitative Services, $13 million/168 employees
• HHSC needs $1.8 billion GR ABOVE “base” to maintain caseload growth and inflation/cost increases in Medicaid and CHIP– $1.7 billion for Medicaid (allows for modest caseload growth)– $14.7 million for CHIP; Enrollment assumed to cap at 339,000 in
2009
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
24
HHS Needs in 2008-09 (continued)
“Above Baseline” Requests• Other HHSC: $254 million for community care waiting lists;
$237 million to restore Medicaid and CHIP rate cuts from 2003
• State Health Services: $116 million for Mental Health and Substance Abuse programs
• Dept. Aging and Disability: $84 million to MAINTAIN community care: $10.7 million to restore 2003 rate cuts
• Family and Protective Services: $79.6 million to continue APS/CPS reform; $590 million to replace Rainy Day funds; $51.3 million for caseload growth
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
25
Texas Unspent CHIP Funds Lost to Other States
• FFY 1998 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $170 million• FFY 1999 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $324.5 million • FFY 2000 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $123.7 million • FFY 2001 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $85.3 million • FFY 2002 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $104.6 million • FFY 2003 Federal SCHIP Funds Lost - $23.8 million • Total lapsed to date (2000-2005): $831.9 million• For perspective, TOTAL Texas CHIP spending in FY 2005 was
$401.6 million, of which $110 million was state dollars• Expected to soon lapse another $26.5 million from the 2004
allocation, based on state estimates as of 8/2006.
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, analysis of CMS data.
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
26
History/Context of Texas CHIP and our
Federal CHIP Funding Allocation • BEFORE 2003 CHIP cuts, Texas was projecting a
CHIP federal funding shortfall by late 2006. • Had spending held flat at Texas’ fiscal year 2002 high (i.e., no
inflation and no enrollment growth) we’d still have had a federal shortfall at least by 2008.
• Now, state is assuming (in current state budget and in official reports to CMS) that CHIP enrollment will rebound, PLUS a perinatal option is scheduled to begin in January 2007.
• The latest (unofficial) state projection for federal CHIP shortfall in Texas is 2010.
• Texas projects 24% growth in CHIP spending from 2006 to 2007; based on this projected (but as yet non-existent) enrollment rebound PLUS new perinatal program
• Additional Texas CHIP spending planned (pending approval), but not included in current state projections: – SCHIP premium assistance waiver; Galveston regional “3-share”
waiver which will include SCHIP
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
27
Federal SCHIP Reauthorization, 2007
• Other states want Texas’ lapsed funds (Other states have used all their and need more…)
• Texas’ CHIP allocation (share of the pie) will be targeted to be reduced based on our lower enrollment
• WILL Congress add money to CHIP to allow for population growth, inflation, or expansion?
• This is a cautionary example of the problems with block grants
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
28
Federal SCHIP Reauthorization, 2007Priorities:• No loss of SCHIP ground in enrollment or benefits
(Need $12-$14 b/5 yrs new $$ to sustain) • Enough growth to cover all eligible/not enrolled @
current eligibility thresholds• Room to cover more uninsured kids• NO cuts to Medicaid to offset SCHIP
Other issues:• Fair treatment of states that did more prior to CHIP
Center for Public Policy Priorities www.cppp.org
29
The Center for Public Policy Priorities encourages you to reproduce and distribute these slides, which were developed
for use in making public presentations.
If you reproduce these slides, please give appropriate credit to CPPP.
The data presented here may become outdated. For the most recent information, or to sign up for our free
e-mail updates, visit www.cppp.org
© CPPP