+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CFB Presentation

CFB Presentation

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: sam
View: 227 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend

of 48

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    1/48

    CFBC

    Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    2/48

    001 656p

    Future utilization of oil and coal in utility and industrial powerstations depend on combustion systems which meet therequirement of an extensive reduction of emission

    One solution with economical benefits is:

    Circulating Fluidized BedCombustion

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    3/48

    History

    141 267p

    Two CFB technologies have been developed

    One origin was a bubbling bed burning low grade fuels

    The other origin were gas/solid reactors for process technology

    applications

    End of 70ies first applications in coal combustion

    Break through

    in the 80ies due to environmental legislationTypically 200 mg/m NOX and 200 - 1,000 mg/m SO2 becamemandatory

    later due to utilisation of opportunity fuels

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    4/48

    between Fixed Grate, Fluidized Bed,

    and Pulverized Firing

    Relationships

    056 338p

    Stoker Firing(Fixed Bed)

    Fluidized Bed FiringBFB CFB

    Gas

    Fuel

    Air Ash

    Velocity 8 - 10 ft/ sec(2.3 - 3.0 m/ s)

    4 - 10 ft/ sec(1.2 - 3.0 m/ s)

    Average BedParticle Size

    6,000 m

    Pulverized Firing(Entrained Bed)

    Gas

    Fuel

    Air

    Ash

    15 - 33 ft/ sec(4.6 - 10.0 m/ s)

    50 m

    Gas

    Fuel &Sorbent

    Air Ash

    1,000 m 100 - 300 m

    Gas

    Fuel &Sorbent

    Air Ash

    15 - 23 ft/ sec(4.6 - 7.0 m/ s)

    Air

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    5/48

    Environmentally friendly

    CFB technology generates power :

    High SO2 capture

    Firing a wide variety of different fuels

    Low NOx emissions

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    6/48

    SO2 Capture

    CaCO3 --> CaO + CO2

    CaO + SO2 + O2 --> Ca SO4

    Furnace temperature control isvery critical

    Limestone consumption variesenormously with furnace

    temperature

    Optimum temperature :850 C

    850800 900

    SO2Capture efficiency

    T (C)

    SO2 Captureachieved bylimestone injection

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    7/48

    NOx Emissions

    - Combustion temperature

    - N2 in fuel

    - Excess air and staggering1 000800 1 200

    NOx

    T (C)

    NOx Emissions influenced by3 main parameters :

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    8/48

    General Process

    Bed temperature

    AirAir

    Air

    Ash

    Coal

    Flue gas

    Temperature maintained by heatpick up in exchange surfaces

    Either in furnace

    Or in FBHE

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    9/48

    CFB Boilers

    1

    32

    7

    4

    5

    6

    8

    9

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    10/48

    Main Design Criteria

    High bed inventory of fine particles

    High recirculation rate

    Highly efficient cyclones

    External and/or Internal heat exchangers for temperaturecontrol depending upon the application

    Concept

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    11/48

    External Heat Exchangers

    A very fine tuning of the bed temperature isnecessary

    Fuel Analysis leads a small furnace

    ( Petroleum coke , Anthracites )

    Very large electrical capacity CFB

    Highly abrasive fuels

    Concept

    Advisable when :

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    12/48

    Furnace

    F B H E

    Cyclone

    FBHE Design

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    13/48

    FBHE Design

    Fluidisationair

    Ashes fromcyclonesAshes to

    furnace

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    14/48

    Wing Walls

    Could be used as Evaporator HP superheater Final reheater

    Furnace

    Erosion protection

    (refratory)

    Tube-fin-tube

    design

    to cyclone

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    15/48

    Omega Panels

    View from top

    Double SuperOmega Design

    Welded Design

    Platen heaters within the furnace are a powerfulfeature:

    To extract heat for superheating from the furnace

    To have a self controlling system for furnace heatextraction (no mechanical control means needed)

    To avoid erosion of heating surfaces by installationin the vertical flow area of the furnace and smoothsurface design

    First unit has now gathered more than 100 000 hoperation with first platen heater equipment.

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    16/48

    CFD Analysisof Cyclone Performance

    006 056px

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    17/48

    (Results from Simulation)

    Fractional Collection Efficiency ofCollection Systems

    056 287p

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    120%

    0 50 100 150 200 250

    d [m]

    Collectionefficiency

    Cyclone

    alternative collection system

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    18/48

    Cyclone Improvement Measures

    056 329p

    DownwardInclinedInlet Duct

    High PerformanceRefractory for Inlet Area

    Eccentric VortexFinder Arrangement

    Advanced VortexFinder Shape

    Second Pass

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    19/48

    (Old and New Cyclone Design)

    Particle Size Distributionof Solid Inventory

    056 330p

    10 m100 1000

    Grain size d

    0.1

    1.0

    (%)

    10.0

    20.030.040.050.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    99.0

    99.9

    ResidueR

    old cyclone designnew cyclone design

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    20/48

    Maximize fine solid recirculation

    Increase carbon burnout as well as limestone utilization

    Increasing solid concentration in the upper furnace leads to enhanced heat transfer perfect temperature homogenity

    Fine PSD of inventory and thus less erosions

    Minimize solids entrained to the backpass and thus less backpass erosion less backpass fouling lower CO generated in the backpass

    High Efficient Cyclone Benefits

    056 343p

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    21/48

    Cyclone Arrangements

    056 352p

    < 100 MWel

    200 - 300 MWel 300 MW - 400 MWel

    100 - 200 MWel

    600 MWel

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    22/48

    125 MWe, 250 MWe andBeyond

    Class 150 MW

    + +

    + +

    ++

    + + +

    + + +

    Class 350 MW Class 600 MW

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    23/48

    Performance of CFB boilers

    EMILE

    HUCHET

    PROVENCE RED

    HILLS

    GOLDENBERG TAMUIN

    OUTPUTMWe

    FUEL

    THERMALEFF.

    DeSOx

    NOxmg/Nm3

    125 250 250 115 130

    CoalCoal slurry Coal ( 4%S )Pitch Lignite Brown coal Petcoke

    > 89 % > 94 % > 93 % > 89 % > 92 %

    > 90 % > 97 % > 95 % > 95 % > 90 %

    < 200 < 250 < 250 83 % (*)

    > 95 % > 95 %

    250 215

    2002 2003

    (*) HHV basis

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    24/48

    Emissions achieved CFBsin Relation to the Fuel Type

    058 180p

    Fuel Type NOX

    mg/mstp, 6 % O2

    SO2

    mg/mstp, 6 % O2

    DesulphurizationEfficiency

    %

    Anthracite & Anthracite tailings 70 220 80

    Petcoke 100 200 97

    Slurry 110 140 95

    Bituminous Coal 80 200 95

    Eastern US Bituminous Coal 60 100 97

    High Moisture Lignite 140 200 90

    High Sulphur Lignite 160 200 97

    Biomass 100 - -

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    25/48

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    26/48

    Details

    Ash Screw Cooler

    056 341p

    Holo-Flite Screw

    Trough Jacket

    Heat Exchanger

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    27/48

    Water Cooled Ash Cooler

    056 323p

    Return to furnace

    Ash inlet duct fromfurnace bottom

    Conveyor ash

    to ash silo

    Fluidizing air

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    28/48

    Split Loop Seal

    056 232px

    Coal

    from Cyclone

    to Furnace

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    29/48

    Major Recent References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 188p

    Power Station Mlad Boleslav

    2 x 50 MW

    Energy Supply for VW-Skoda Factory

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - BituminousCoal

    Capacity t/h 2 x 140

    Design Pressure bar 145

    Temperature C 535

    Commissioning - 1998

    Country - Czech Republic

    Customer - SKO Energo

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    30/48

    + 53.0 m

    0.0 m

    Power Station Cao Ngan,2 x 50 MWLongitudinal Section

    012 223p

    Live Steam115 bar (design pressure)

    538 C66 kg/s (237.6 t/h)

    Feedwater223 C

    Fuel

    Vietnamese Lean CoalCustomer

    VINACOAL, Vietnam

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    31/48

    Utility Boiler

    012 183p

    Major References:

    Power Station Ledvice

    110 MW

    CFB Fired Boiler in Czech Republic

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Brown Coal

    Capacity t/h 350

    Design Pressure bar 135

    Temperature C 545

    Commissioning - 2001

    Country - CzechRepublic

    Customer - CEZ a.s.

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    32/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 185p

    Power Station Emile Huchet

    125 MW

    CFB Fired Boiler in France

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - BituminousCoal

    Capacity t/h 367

    Design Pressure bar 155

    Temperature C 545/540

    Commissioning - 1990

    Country - France

    Customer - SODELIF

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    33/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 187p

    Power Station Goldenberg

    125 MW

    Extra large Furnace due to wet

    (up to 60 % water) Brown Coal

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Lignite

    Capacity t/h 400

    Design Pressure bar 135

    Temperature C 505

    Commissioning - 1992

    Country - Germany

    Customer - RWE

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    34/48

    Akrimota, 2 x 125 MW

    Boiler with CFB

    012 217p

    Live Steam138 bar538 C

    405 t/hReheater Steam

    36 bar537 C375 t/h

    Feedwater247 C

    FuelHigh SulphurLignite

    0.0 m

    + 50.0 m

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    35/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 184p

    Power Station Tamuin

    2 x 130 MW

    CFB Fired Boilers in Mexico

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Petroleum Coke

    Capacity t/h 2 x 395

    Design Pressure bar 154

    Temperature C 540/540

    Commissioning - 2002

    Country - Mexico

    Customer - SITHE-IPG

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    36/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 198p

    RF#1

    2 x 150 MW

    CFB Fired Boilers in Taiwan

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Petroleum Coke

    Capacity t/h 2 x 500

    Design Pressure bar 149

    Temperature C 541

    Commissioning - 2002

    Country - Taiwan

    Customer - FHI

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    37/48

    Major Recent References:

    Utility Boiler

    012 154p

    Power Station an

    2 x 160 MW

    First CFB Fired Boilers in Turkey

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Lignite

    Capacity t/h 2 x 462

    Design Pressure bar 199

    Temperature C 543/542

    Commissioning - 2002

    Country - Turkey

    Customer - TEAS

    + 56.7 m

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    38/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    011 422p

    Tonghae Thermal Power Plant

    2 x 220 MW

    Reheat CFB Boilers in

    Republic of Korea

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Anthracite

    Capacity t/h 2 x 693

    Design Pressure bar 172

    Temperature C 541/541

    Commissioning - 1998 and 1999

    Country - Republic of Korea

    Customer - Tonghae

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    39/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    011 424p

    Power Station Provence

    250 MW

    First 250 MW CFB Boilers in the world

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Bituminous Coal

    Capacity t/h 700

    Design Pressure bar 193

    Temperature C 565/565

    Commissioning - 1995

    Country - France

    Customer - SOPROLIF

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    40/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    011 459p

    Power Station Red Hills

    2 x 250 MW

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - Lignite

    Capacity t/h 2 x 753

    Design Pressurebar 203

    Temperature C 540/568

    Commissioning - 2001

    Country - USA

    Customer - Choctaw Generation

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    41/48

    Major References:

    Utility Boiler

    011 423p

    Power Station Guayama

    2 x 250 MW

    Reheat CFB Boilers in Puerto Rico

    Technology - CFB

    Fuel - BituminousCoal

    Capacity t/h 2 x 819

    Design Pressure bar 207 Temperature C 540/540

    Commissioning - 2003

    Country - Puerto Rico

    Customer - AES

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    42/48

    3 D Model

    250 MW CFB for Indian Lignite

    011 475p

    Fuels for

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    43/48

    NCV

    MJ/kg

    Water content

    Weight % a.r.

    Ash content

    Weight % a.r.

    Sulphur

    % maf

    Anthracite 16 8 37

    Bituminous coal 19 - 29 7 - 24 3 - 25

    Lignite 12 - 18 12 - 42 12 - 26 5.5 - 12Brown coal 8 - 12 35 - 58 1 - 40 1 - 13

    Special fuels:

    Petcoke < 31.0 < 5 < 1 < 7

    Wood chips 12 36 2

    Coal slurry 10.5 33 30

    Paper sludge 2.4 62 15

    Sewage sludge 0.6 73 15

    Bark 9 - 16 15 - 50 1 - 3 (20)

    Fuels forCirculating Fluidized Beds

    056 295p

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    44/48

    Reference Summary

    141 269p

    Fuels

    Coal and ligniteWater content up to 60 %Ash content up to 40 %Sulphur content up to 13 % maf

    various opportunity fuels

    (coal, slurry, sewage sludge, petcoke, bark, ...)

    Water/Steam side

    Natural circulationAssisted circulation

    Once-through (engineering study)With/without reheat up to 560 C

    Capacity

    From 70 MWth up to 250 MWel600 MWel under investigation

    Advantages of CFB

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    45/48

    Advantages of CFBfor High Sulphur Lignite

    Desulphurization of > 97 % achievable

    Reduced slagging tendency in the furnace

    No slagging due to pyrite of other sulphur components

    Reduced fouling in the backpass due to low temperatureand even temperature profile

    Higher boiler efficiency Marginal SO3 in flue gas due to SO3 capture by limestone

    Therefore, flue gas exit temperature of 140 C or less

    056 374p

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    46/48

    Lignite Fired CFB Plants

    Sulphur content of 14 % (daf) commercially utilized in CFB

    Desulphurization of > 97 % achievable

    Special attention must be given to cyclone performance

    Equal fuel / air / limestone feeding into the furnace must beensured under all operating conditions

    Intensive testing is highly recommended:

    mine operation coal analysis with emphasis on type of sulphur

    available limestone sources and limestone reactivity

    combustion tests give valuable results

    Conclusion

    056 377p

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    47/48

    Summary

    001 673p

    CFB technology is well developed todayMore than 300 CFB plants are operating or are under constructionPlants with 250 MW capacity are running since 1995

    CFB technology meets environmental requirementsNOX values less than 200 mg/m3 s.t.p. and desulphurizationefficiencies higher than 97 % could be achieved

    CFB techhnology is able to burn a wide range of fuelsEspecially high sulphur and/or high ash or high water coals couldbe utilized

  • 7/31/2019 CFB Presentation

    48/48


Recommended