+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: bina
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. A legal , moral, or social entitlement due to all people because they are human beings. The ability to conduct one’s affairs without being hampered or frustrated. QUOTES Freedom is anarchy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
14
A legal , moral, or social entitlement due to all people because they are human beings. The ability to conduct one’s affairs without being hampered or frustrated. QUOTES Freedom is anarchy. ts are freedoms expressed with responsibility Rights are something you are entitled to. dom is being able to express your entitlements
Transcript
Page 1: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

A legal , moral, or social entitlement due to all

people because they are human

beings.

The ability to conduct one’s affairs without being

hampered or frustrated.

QUOTESFreedom is anarchy.

Rights are freedoms expressed with responsibility

Rights are something you are entitled to. Freedom is being able to express your entitlements

Page 2: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

THE GLOBAL MOVEMENTHuman rights became a global issue after WW II

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS-backed by the UN after -“all human beings are born free & equal in

dignity & rights”.-Most countries have agreed to these principles.-Problem – the only power the UN has is

‘world attention.’-Not part of binding international law.

INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS1946 International Court of Justice (Both parties had to agree)2002 a more permanent International Criminal Court established.

USA, China & others opposed (internal courts sufficient)

World Abuses 1870-1996Canada’s Indian Act &

Residential Schools1900-69 Australia ‘Stolen Generation’1924-53 Stalin1939-45 Holocaust1948-94 Apartheid1959-? Chinese occupied Tibet1971-79 Dictatorship in Uganda1989 Tiananmen Square China1991-99 Civil War Sierra Leone1992-95 Bosnian War1994 Rwandan Genocide2004 Darfur genocide

Stalin’s Purges

Apartheid

Residential Schools

Protest in China

Rwandan Genocide

Page 3: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS – 1960 Formally recognized Can. Rights held by common law. Problem – ‘No teeth’ -> Could be changed like any other law. Did not override Fed. Or Prov. laws.

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS & FREEDOM ‘The Bill of Rights with teeth’ -> Trudeau included in Constitution. Limiting The Charter –

Reasonable Limits (Keegstra’s teachings on Holocaust) Notwithstanding Clause – Fed. & Prov. Leg. have final say (Bill 101)

THE CHARTER IN ACTION Fundamental Freedoms

Conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion, expression, assembly, & association.

Mobility Rights (Free movement) No extradition for death penalties, Effects of 9-11.

Equality Rights Race, origin, colour, religion, sex, age, disability. Exceptions – Affirmative action – protects minority rights & disadvantaged.

Legal Rights Arrest procedures, questioning, search & seizure.

Gurbaj SinghKirpan in

school issue

James KeegstraAlberta teacher

who taught hatred(Holocaust)

THE SUPREME COURT& THE RULE OF lAW

Delwin VriendSchool teacher firedfor being gay by a religious private,school in Alberta

Do airport scanners violate

your rights?

Other Issues Concert goers

AbortionPublic cameras

PregnacyRadar cameras Gay

Marriage,

TRUANT’S GOLDEN RULE – “Life, Liberty, & Security”

Diefenbaker

Trudeau

Page 4: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

REASONABLE LIMITS CLAUSE

“Charter must be reasonable”The Oakes Test - Oakes had 8 vials of hash & $600. - Charged with trafficking; Onus was on him to prove innocence. - Supreme said small amounts is unreasonable for reverse onus. Violates “Presumption of Innocence”

“Life, Liberty, Security.”

Oakes possessed 8 vials of hash oil & $600 cash.

Trafficking??? Personal Use??? Innocence???

NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE

Provinces wanted an assurance to protect local issues.

Quebec - Bill 101 / 178French only signs / language

1928-72 Alberta Sterilization Program Klein tried used clause to protect provinces from civil suit based on previous gov’t. FAILED!!!!!

The Oakes Test1.Must be important2.Must be rational3.Limits must be as minimal as possible.4. Must fit societies objectives.

Page 5: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

JURISDICTION & ENFORCEMENTJURISDICTION-Applies to all gov’t organizations

- Ex. Gov’t Branches, corporations, banks.-Private individuals will look to Fed. & Prov. Human Rights Codes

- Ex. Discrimination renting or hiring

ENFORCEMENT-People can challenge gov’t positions through the Supreme Court

- Charter is written in general terms so judges can interpret individual cases.- Questions to be asked by Supreme Courts:

1. Is the right covered by Charter? 2. Were these rights infringed upon by gov’t?3. Is the violation within reasonable limits?

EXAMPLE – Polygamy – Bountiful1. Freedom of Religion2. Arresting practicing members3. Under-aged (forced???) marriages

Video - Bountiful

Page 6: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

CANADA’S HISTORICAL BLACK EYES

Slavery banned in 1833

Banning PotlatchIllegal to hire lawyers

1960 = Right to voteResidential Schools Chinese Head

Tax1900s

Komogata Maru1914

Women = Vote1918

Alberta Sexual

Sterilization

Act

PsychiatricHospitalPatients1928

Women notConsidered “Persons”

1929

WW IIWar Measures Act

Enemy Aliens (Deported, No land)Internment Camps Jews = No Land

Page 7: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

SUE RODRIGUEZ (August 2, 1950 – February 12, 1994)

ADVOCATE FOR ASSISTED SUICIDE.

-lived in Victoria, British Columbia-diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in early 1991. -fought to legalize assisted suicide; under the Criminal Code of Canada, - assisted suicide is punishable by a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. -Her cause went to the Supreme Court of Canada, but lost. (5-4 against her.)-On September 30, 1993, she decided to take her own life with the help of an -Anonymous physician. -would become a landmark decision, Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), - In 1994, she decided to take her own life with the help of an anonymous physician. -Svend Robinson, a New Democratic Party MP who had campaigned her cause, was also

present.

Page 8: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 9: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 10: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 11: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 12: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 13: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Page 14: CH 4 CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Recommended