Metal Casting Conference – South Africa 2017
TU Bergakademie Freiberg | Foundry Department | Bernhard-von-Cotta-Str. 4 | 09599 Freiberg |
Tel.: 03731 / 39-4000 | www.gi.tu-freiberg.de | Dr.-Ing. Claudia Dommaschk | South Africa 2017
Chances and limits of High silicon ductile iron
Dr.-Ing. Claudia Dommaschk
TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Foundry Department
Introduction
By using Si-contents between 3 and 4.3 % and a ferritic structure, the
strength increases by solid-solution hardening of the ferrite
In Ductile Iron the strength increases with the increase of the pearlite
content, promoted by Mn,Cu,Sn
EN GJS-600-10
EN GJS-600-3
2
pearlitic
high silicon
Ductile Iron with homogenous ferritic Matrix
The radii of the Si- and Fe- Atoms are different
Stress in the lattice
solid-solution hardening of the ferrite
rSi = 117 pm
rFe = 124 pm
3
Basics
body-centered cubic
lattice
„conventional“ Ductile iron: control of properties by Ferrite – Pearlite – ratio
Basics
GJS – 400 – 18 GJS – 500 – 7 GJS – 600 – 3
GJS – 450 – 18
Si~3.2%
GJS – 500 – 14
Si~3.8%
GJS – 600 – 10
Si~4,3%
„high Si-“ Ductile iron: control of properties by Si-Content
4
2,4 % Si 4,8 % Si
The effects of Silicon
• Movement of the eutectic point to lower Carbon-contents
• Increase of the eutectoid temperature The formation of ferrite is promoted
• Increase of the eutectoid interval
• Decrease of the austenite area5
In 2011 the DIN EN 1563 was modified.
Three high silicon materials were registered:
EN-GJS-450-18
EN-GJS-500-14
EN-GJS-600-10
EN-GJS 450-10 450-18 500-7 500-14 600-3 600-10
min. Rm
[N/mm²]
450 450 500 500 600 600
min. Rp0,2
[N/mm²]
310 350 320 400 370 470
min. A
[%]
10 18 7 14 3 10
6
Comparison of the properties –
„Conventional“ Ductile Iron – High silicon Ductile iron
7
Elongation [%]
0.2
% Y
ield
Str
ength
[MP
a]
2 3 4 5 6
% Si
The tensile strength has the maximum at 4.3 % silicon
[M
4,3
%S
i
Y-2 samples
Y-4 samples
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0Te
nsile
Str
en
gth
[MP
a]
The Influence of the silicon content
Results
8Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
The Influence of the silicon content
2 3 4 5 6
% Si
The 0.2 % yield strength has the maximum later than the tensile strength
[M
4,3
%S
i
Y-2 samples
Y-4 samples
0.2
% y
ield
str
en
gth
[MP
a]
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
9Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
2 3 4 5 6
% Si
With silicon contents higher than 4.3 % the elongation is dramatically reduced
The Influence of the silicon content
[M
Y-2 samples
Y-4 samples
Elo
ng
atio
n [%
]
4,3
%S
i
10Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
With increasing the Si content, the hardness increases continuously
The Influence of the silicon content
4,3
%S
i
Bri
ne
llH
ard
ne
ss
% Si
11Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
The mechanical properties depends on
the temperature.
The difference of the Tensile strength
and Yield Strength between „new“ and
„conventionel“ Dutile Iron is minimal at
temperatures above 400 °C
12Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
4,3
%S
i
The influence of pearlitic and carbidic elements
Tensile
str
ength
[MP
a]
The tensile strength is not influenced by different alloying or trace elements
13Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
4,3
%S
i
[MP
a]
The influence of pearlitic and carbidic elements
The Yield stress is not influenced by different alloying or trace elements
14Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
4,3
%S
i
Elo
ngation [%
]
The influence of pearlitic and carbidic elements
The elongation is not influenced by different alloying or trace elements
15Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
4,03% Si; 3,01 %C; 1,0 % Mn; 0,003 % Cr
Rm: 581 MPa; Rp0,2: 486 MPa; A: 19,8 %
Structure Y2-sample
4,16% Si; 3,04 %C; 1,0 % Mn; 0,3 % Cr
Rm: 618 MPa; Rp0,2: 481 MPa; A: 18,6 %
0 % Pearlite 0,5 % Pearlite
16Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
- 17 -
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
GJS 400-18(ferritic)
GJS 500-7(ferritic/pearlitic)
GJS 450-18(ferritic, Si: 3.08%)
GJS 500-14(ferritic, Si: 3.62%)
GJS 600-10(ferritic, Si: 4.12%)
RT -20°C
Impact
str
ength
(J)
Fibrous Fracture
Fibrous Fracture
Fibrous and Brittle Fracture
Brittle Fracture
Brittle Fracture
Quelle: Knothe, Vortrag VDI Konferenz 2016 18
Influence of the Silicon content to the Notched bar impact strength
Notc
hed
bar
impactstr
ength
(J)
Temperature (°C)
ferritic
ferritic (Si: 3,2%)
ferritic (Si: 3,8%)
ferritic/pearlitic
• Conventional ferritic Ductile iron has the best impact strength.
• With increasing Si content, the notched impact strength decreases.
• The steep front of the impact strength is displaced to higher temperatures.
Quelle: Pusch, G. u.a.: CAEF, Continuous Casting Section, Prüfbericht: TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Januar 2012 19
Results – Fracture mechanics
The Fracture toughness decreases dramatically with increasing Si content.
Quellen: [4] Wolfensberger, S. u. a.: Teil II: Gusseisen mit Kugelgraphit, Giessereiforschung 39 (1987) 2, S. 71-80
[5] Komatsu, S. u. a: AFS Transactions, 102, 1994, pp 121-125
[6] Pusch, G. u.a.: CAEF, Continuous Casting Section, Prüfbericht: TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Januar 2012 20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4
KIC
(Mp
a*m
1/2
)
Si (%)
Quelle: Pusch, G. u.a.: CAEF, Continuous Casting Section, Prüfbericht: TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Januar 2012 21
Results – Fracture mechanics
KIC
(Mpa*m
1/2)
GJS 400-18 GJS 450-18 GJS 700-2
(ferritic) (ferritic, high-Si) (pearlitic)
The Fracture toughness of the ferritic High Si- Ductile Iron and the pearlitic
Ductile Iron are similarly low.
Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
Inoculation technology
Conte
nt
ofN
odula
rgra
phite
part
icels
(shape
V a
nd
VI)
Wall Thickness (mm)
% Inoculants
21
The degree of nodularity depends on the type of inoculant
Wall Thickness (mm)
Inoculant 1%
Conte
nt
of
Nodula
rgra
phite
part
icels
(shape
V a
nd
VI)
(73-78 % Si; max 0,1 % Ca; 0,6-1
% Sr; max. 0,5 % Al)
22Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
Example Inoculant 1:
The content of nodular graphite particels with shape V and VI decreases
with increasing the Si-content
Wall Thickness (mm)
Inoculant 2%
Conte
nt
ofN
odula
rgra
phite
part
icels
(shape
V a
nd
VI)
(62-38 % Si; 1 % Al; 1,8-2,4%
Ca; 0,8-1,2% Re; 0,8-1,2 % Bi)
23Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
Example Inoculant 2:
The content of nodular graphite particels with shape V and VI increases
with increasing the Si-content to ~4.4%
Structure and inoculation technology
Co
nte
nt o
fN
od
ula
rg
rap
hite
pa
rtic
els
(sh
ap
eV
an
dV
I)
%
Good inoculation
Poor inoculationHigh Si
Low Si
Different
inoculants
Wall Thickness (mm)
24Quelle: Projekt „SIRON“;AiF-Nr.: 41 EN
25
Results on a real casting
GJS-600-3
Material do Rm Rp0.2 A
Pos. [mm] [Mpa] [Mpa] [%]
1 GJS-600-3 6 675 372 7.9
2 GJS-600-3 12 646 375 4.4
1 GJS-600-10 6 638 503 18.0
2 GJS-600-10 12 633 508 14.7
1
2
GJS-600-10
2
1
25
Because of the combination of a high tensile strength, high 0.2 yield
strength and good elongation it is possible to decrease the wall thickness
(Light weight construction)
The hardness and tensile strength is homogenous over the wall thickness
It is not necessary to chance the pattern
Higher contents of carbidic elements in the charge materials are not a problem.
Benefits of HighSi- ferritic Ductil Iron
against ferritic/pearlitic Ductile Iron
26
Summary
27
Summary
- An optimal process technology is absolutly necessary.
- The Si-content is limited to 4.3 %.
- The solid solution hardening leads to a massive embrittlement of the ferrite.
The properties are not comparable to the conventional α- ferrite.
- The fracture behavior changes from the fibrous fracture to the brittle fracture
- With Increasing the Si- content will decrease the impact strength will decrease
- The Fracture toughness of the ferritic High Si- Ductile Iron and the pearlitic
Ductile Iron are similarly low.
Problems