Date post: | 31-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | paapumaddy |
View: | 534 times |
Download: | 5 times |
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 1
E. FRANK HARRISON
Fifth Edition
The Managerial Decision-Making Process
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 2
The Managerial Decision-Making ProcessThe Managerial Decision-Making ProcessFifth EditionFifth Edition
The Managerial Decision-Making ProcessThe Managerial Decision-Making ProcessFifth EditionFifth Edition
Author: E. Frank Harrison, Ph.D.Author: E. Frank Harrison, Ph.D.
Slides by Monique A. Pelletier, Ph.D.Slides by Monique A. Pelletier, Ph.D.
Author: E. Frank Harrison, Ph.D.Author: E. Frank Harrison, Ph.D.
Slides by Monique A. Pelletier, Ph.D.Slides by Monique A. Pelletier, Ph.D.
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 3
The Managerial The Managerial Decision-MakingDecision-Making
Process Process
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 4
The Managerial The Managerial Decision-Making ProcessDecision-Making Process
Process components are decision-Process components are decision-making functions.making functions.
Decision-making functions are highly Decision-making functions are highly interrelated and interdependent.interrelated and interdependent.
The process is highly dynamic with The process is highly dynamic with several subprocesses.several subprocesses.
The process can accommodate several The process can accommodate several concurrent Category II decisions.concurrent Category II decisions.
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 5
Figure 2.1 The Decision-Making ProcessFigure 2.1 The Decision-Making Process
SearchingSearchingforfor
alternativesalternatives
ImplementingImplementingdecisionsdecisions
Follow-upFollow-upandand
controlcontrol
SettingSettingmanagerialmanagerialobjectivesobjectives
Comparing &Comparing &evaluatingevaluating
alternativesalternatives
The actThe actof choiceof choiceTake Take
correctivecorrectiveaction as action as necessarynecessary
RenewRenewsearchsearch
ReviseReviseobjectivesobjectives
Revise or Revise or update update objectivesobjectives
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 6
Decision-Making Function No. 1Decision-Making Function No. 1
Objectives constitute the foundation Objectives constitute the foundation for rational decision making.for rational decision making.
Objectives are the ends for the means Objectives are the ends for the means of managerial decision making.of managerial decision making.
Attainment of the objective is the Attainment of the objective is the ultimate measure of decision success.ultimate measure of decision success.
Setting Managerial Objectives:Setting Managerial Objectives:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 7
Decision-Making Function No. 2Decision-Making Function No. 2
The limitations of time and moneyThe limitations of time and money The declining value of additional The declining value of additional
informationinformation The rising cost of additional The rising cost of additional
informationinformation Abort the search in the zone of cost Abort the search in the zone of cost
effectivenesseffectiveness
Searching for Alternatives:Searching for Alternatives:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 8
Figure 2.2 The Cost of Additional InformationFigure 2.2 The Cost of Additional Information
Cost
Averagevalue
Marginalvalue
Point ofoptimality
Zone ofcosteffectiveness
Perfection of informationPerfection of information00 100%100%
Val
ue
and
V
alu
e an
d
cost
of
add
itio
nal
info
rmat
ion
cost
of
add
itio
nal
info
rmat
ion
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 9
Decision-Making Function No. 3Decision-Making Function No. 3
Alternatives result from the search.Alternatives result from the search. There are usually three to five There are usually three to five
alternatives.alternatives. One alternative is to do nothing.One alternative is to do nothing. Alternatives are evaluated using Alternatives are evaluated using
criteria derived from the objective.criteria derived from the objective.
Comparing and Evaluating Comparing and Evaluating Alternatives:Alternatives:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 10
Decision-Making Function No. 3 Decision-Making Function No. 3 (cont’d)(cont’d)
Evaluation should include an Evaluation should include an anticipation of the likely outcome for anticipation of the likely outcome for each alternative.each alternative.
Evaluation should also anticipate Evaluation should also anticipate obstacles or difficulties at the time of obstacles or difficulties at the time of implementation.implementation.
Also:Also:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 11
Decision-Making Function No. 4Decision-Making Function No. 4
The choice is the culmination of the The choice is the culmination of the process, not all of it.process, not all of it.
The choice confronts the decision The choice confronts the decision maker with discernible constraints.maker with discernible constraints.
The best alternative may not be readily The best alternative may not be readily apparent to the decision maker.apparent to the decision maker.
The Act of Choice:The Act of Choice:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 12
Decision-Making Function No. 4 Decision-Making Function No. 4 (cont’d)(cont’d)
The best choice is likely to ensue The best choice is likely to ensue from the right approach.from the right approach.
The choice should be the alternative The choice should be the alternative most likely to result in the most likely to result in the attainment of the objective.attainment of the objective.
Also:Also:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 13
Decision-Making Function No. 5Decision-Making Function No. 5
Implementing Decisions:Implementing Decisions:
Decision success is a function Decision success is a function
of decision quality of decision quality
and and
decision implementation.decision implementation.
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 14
Decision-Making Function No. 5 Decision-Making Function No. 5 (cont’d)(cont’d)
Observance of operating constraintsObservance of operating constraints Influence of the decision makerInfluence of the decision maker Involvement of decision Involvement of decision
implementersimplementers Absence of conflict of interestAbsence of conflict of interest
Areas contributing to decision Areas contributing to decision success:success:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 15
Decision-Making Function No. 5 Decision-Making Function No. 5 (cont’d)(cont’d)
Disregard of timelinessDisregard of timeliness Unlimited additional informationUnlimited additional information Disregard of risk/reward Disregard of risk/reward
relationshipsrelationships
Areas detracting from decision Areas detracting from decision success:success:
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 16
StrategicStrategicDecisionDecisionQualityQuality
1.1. Compatibility withCompatibility with 1.1. Conflict of Conflict of interest.interest.operating constraints.operating constraints.
2.2. Timeliness.Timeliness. 2.2. Risk-reward Risk-reward factor.factor.
3.3. Optimum amount ofOptimum amount of 3.3. Understanding Understanding thetheinformation.information. decision.decision.
4.4. Influence of theInfluence of thedecision maker.decision maker.
Figure 2.3 Evaluation of Strategic Figure 2.3 Evaluation of Strategic Decision SuccessDecision Success
StrategicStrategicDecisionDecisionSuccessSuccess
= = ff + + ff Strategic DecisionStrategic DecisionImplementationImplementation
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 17
Decision-Making Function No. 6Decision-Making Function No. 6
Follow-up and control is essential to Follow-up and control is essential to ensure that an implemented decision ensure that an implemented decision meets its objective.meets its objective.
Performance is measured by Performance is measured by observing the implemented decision observing the implemented decision in relation to its standard derived in relation to its standard derived from the objective.from the objective.
Follow-Up and ControlFollow-Up and Control
Copyright © 1999 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 2 - 18
Decision-Making Function No. 6 Decision-Making Function No. 6 (cont’d)(cont’d)
Unacceptable variance from standard Unacceptable variance from standard performance should elicit timely and performance should elicit timely and appropriate corrective action.appropriate corrective action.
Corrective action (Corrective action (subprocess no. 1subprocess no. 1) may ) may result in the implementation of another result in the implementation of another alternative (alternative (subprocess no. 2subprocess no. 2), which, if ), which, if not successful, may result in a revision of not successful, may result in a revision of the original objective (the original objective (subprocess no. 3subprocess no. 3).).
Also:Also: