TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
1 | P a g e
Research
Chaplaincy and Spiritual Care Services: The Case for Muslim Patients
Wahiba Abu-Ras, Ph.D.1 Address:
1Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530.
Email: Wahiba Abu-Ras, Ph.D.
Topics in Integrative Health Care 2011, Vol. 2(2) ID: 2.2002 Published on June 30, 2011 | Link to Document on the Web
ABSTRACT
Religion and spirituality are the first, and sometimes the only available sources of comfort for many
hospital patients facing difficult and stressful times. Since chaplaincy is typically practiced along Judeo-
Christian lines, other spiritual perspectives receive less attention. This study assesses the existing
chaplaincy care services available for Muslim patients as perceived by two different groups, 33 Muslim
and non-Muslim chaplains and by 56 directors of chaplaincy departments at New York City hospitals. A
mixed-methods approach was used, including a cross-sectional survey and in-depth interviews. The
results indicate that Muslim patients’ religious needs may be underserved, and that they may not
receive appropriate chaplaincy care. These results may provide a better understanding of the challenges
that other immigrants and minority groups face when receiving medical care, and of the need for quality
spiritual care for these communities.
INTRODUCTION
Religion, spirituality, and faith provide the majority of Americans with a healthy means of coping with
adversity, giving them the ability to recover from difficult events and losses.1-3. Research indicates that
religion provides psychological benefits and important social resources.4 Several studies show that the
healthy practice of one’s faith usually correlates with positive mental and physical health,5-8 both of
which are associated with the prevention of illness across divergent religious communities 4,9
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
2 | P a g e
Approximately 90% of hospitalized patients within the United States indicate they use religion to cope
with illness, and over 40% say it is the most important factor in their struggle for recovery.10
Although there is no definitive link between religious guidance and health, some studies suggest that
chaplaincy plays an important role in helping patients cope with physical illness.11-12 In its accreditation
of hospitals in the US, The Joint Commission requires hospitals to respect “the patient’s cultural and
personal values, beliefs and preferences” and to accommodate “the patient’s right to religious and other
spiritual services.”13, p.15 Spiritual care integrates the body and the soul and, as such, its provision by
chaplains is critical in identifying a model for successful patient outcomes. In an increasingly pluralist
society such as that of the US, the expectation is that the diverse needs of all faith communities will be
met. However, in the US, the predominantly Christian population tends to benefit most from chaplaincy
services, while the spiritual needs of other minority religious groups often are not adequately
addressed.14-16 This trend may reflect a lack of diversity within chaplaincy services, despite the diverse
hospital patient populations they serve.
VandeCreek and Lyon17 found that a patient’s level of satisfaction increases when chaplains respond to
diverse patient concerns in a sensitive manner. However, when a chaplain of a different religious
denomination was asked to pray, the patient deemed the prayer to be inappropriate, even when the
chaplaincy visit helped the patient address important medical, nursing and administrative issues.17
Hamza18 supported this finding by noting that the lack of knowledge about minority patients’ spiritual
needs, or the existence of ethnic differences between the chaplain and patient, can negatively impact
this relationship and its effectiveness.15 The ability to meet the needs of all patients is important, not
only for the well-being of the patients themselves, but also for the entire hospital staff that seeks to
maximize patient satisfaction and foster positive patient relations.
The Case of Muslim Patients in New York City
Currently, there are no accurate data about the exact number of Muslims in the US. However, some
have estimated that Muslims are the second largest religious group in the world and one of the most
rapidly-growing religions in the United States, after Christians,18 with census estimates ranging between
5.7 million18 and 7 million.19 The annual growth rate of this population is 6%, compared to the average
national rate of 0.09%, and the Muslim population is expected to double by the year 2014.20 Muslims
also tend to be more concentrated in urban centers.21
In 2000, 2.9 million of 8 million New York City residents reported being foreign-born. These immigrants
come from diverse ethnic backgrounds, in numbers unmatched by any other US city.22 In New York City,
there are about 600,000 Muslims,23 and they are almost equally represented by three major regional or
ethnic groups: African American, Middle Eastern (including Arabs and Persians), and South Asian (mostly
Pakistanis and Indians).24 These diverse groups signify a wide spectrum of religious practices, adherence,
rituals, and traditions. However, their core Islamic worship and theology are remarkably uniform
compared to many religions.24 For example, Muslims who practice Islam adhere to all or to most of the
five pillars of Islam, including utterance of the Shahada (the Islamic statement of faith), daily prayers five
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
3 | P a g e
times each day, fasting during the holy month of Ramadan, giving Zakat (charity), and pilgrimage to
Mecca.25 Many Muslims consider their religion and beliefs to be the most important aspect of their
spiritual essence,26 especially as they relate to daily practices, health care needs, medical ethics, and
end-of-life treatment choices. The chaplain thus serves as a cultural broker, guiding patients toward
health care decisions that are congruent with their beliefs and spiritual needs.
In today’s highly technological health care system, ethical questions regarding patient care arise
frequently. Many Muslim patients draw upon Islamic legal tradition and religious scriptures for guidance
when making difficult decisions, including whether to continue aggressive treatment, participate in
family planning, or receive or donate organs.27-28 Professional chaplains who are knowledgeable about
Muslim traditions may serve as spiritual care liaisons between patients and their families, and staff
members who need to understand the specific needs and values of Muslim patients.16,15
Racism and discrimination in the US affect many immigrants from non-English-speaking communities.
However, the experiences of the Muslim community are exceptionally different for several reasons.
Most Muslims have experienced religious discrimination, a problem that has become endemic since the
9/11 attacks.29-30 As a result of the political and social climate in the United States, and particularly in
New York City, many Muslims feel further marginalized and are afraid to utilize government services,
including health care services.31-32 This prompts many American Muslims to use religion and faith as a
source of support and a means to cope.5, 33-34 In addition, mental health research has demonstrated that
American Muslims are more likely to report emotional or psychosocial problems to spiritual leaders,
imams (Muslim leaders), and chaplains than to mental health professionals.35,34
While most empirical studies have thus far focused on Judeo-Christian religious populations, the
following study is the first to examine and assess existing chaplaincy care services for Muslim patients,
as perceived by directors of chaplaincy departments and by both Muslim and non-Muslim chaplains in
New York City hospitals. This study also highlights the major barriers Muslim patients face when
accessing services in hospitals and health care settings within an urban region, and identifies ways to
minimize these barriers as suggested by the study participants.
METHODS
Sample Selection and Recruitment Procedures
The study uses mixed methods, comprised of a cross-sectional survey administered to 56 hospital
pastoral care directors (from this point on referred to as directors) and a series of in-depth, semi-
structured interviews with 33 Muslim and non-Muslim hospital chaplains (from this point on referred to
as chaplains) in hospitals and health care settings within the five boroughs of New York City (Manhattan,
Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, and Staten Island). The survey and the semi-structured questionnaire used in
the face-to-face interviews were developed by the investigator specifically for this study, to gather data
on the: a) New York City hospitals and health care settings’ socio-demographics; b) chaplains’ socio-
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
4 | P a g e
demographics; c) availability and access to pastoral and spiritual care services among Muslim patients
compared to non-Muslim patients; and d) perception of the chaplains and directors with respect to the
major barriers Muslim patients face in the utilization of pastoral services.
A list of 45 directors at New York City hospitals was provided by the HealthCare Chaplaincy organization
and another list of 40 directors was identified directly through hospitals’ websites. A survey
questionnaire and an invitation letter were mailed to all 85 potential directors inviting them to take part
in the study. Six surveys were returned with incorrect addresses, and 56 surveys were completed and
returned, for a response rate of 71%.
For the face-to-face interviews, 40 hospitals were randomly selected from New York City’s five
boroughs. The investigator was granted 33 interviews in total. All interviews were conducted in English,
in a hospital setting. Informed consent and study procedures were reviewed and approved by the
Institutional Review Board of Adelphi University.
Statistical Analysis
Prior to data analysis, measures of central tendency and variability and histograms were generated for
all variables to examine outlier cases and skewness coefficients. Because of the severe skewness
coefficients and the outlier cases found in part of the data, the median was reported in addition to the
mean as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Descriptive univariate analysis was used to analyze the quantitative
data. For the qualitative data, a grounded thematic approach was employed to analyze transcripts of all
interviews using the computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software package, ATLAS.ti (2008).36
Based on the thematic findings of this question, all participants’ responses were compared and
contrasted.
RESULTS
Most directors (36%, n = 20) and chaplains (34%, n = 11) in this study worked in Manhattan and
Brooklyn hospitals (27%, n =15; 21%, n = 7, respectively). The majority of the directors (56%, n = 28) and
the chaplains (70%, n = 23) were male, and 66% of the participants held a Master’s degree or higher,
sharing the same mean age of approximately 57 years. While none of the directors were Muslim, the
chaplains represented a broader range of religious affiliation, including Christian (49%, n = 16), Jewish
(21%, n = 7), and Muslim chaplains (30%, n = 10). About two-thirds of the directors (66%, n = 37) and the
chaplains (70%, n = 23) served in general hospitals, most in non-profit institutions. The majority of
hospitals ranged in size from medium to large (201 to 600+ beds) facilities. About half (48%, n = 11) of
the non-Muslim chaplains (four female and seven male) were board-certified. Of the 10 Muslim
participants, one was a board-certified chaplain. According to the Association of Professional Chaplains
(www.professionalchaplains.org), board-certified chaplains have demonstrated professional excellence
as a chaplain, met all eligibility requirements (including a Bachelor’s Degree, a 72 semester credit
graduate theological degree from an accredited school, four units of clinical pastoral education (CPE)
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
5 | P a g e
ordination or commissioning to function in a ministry of pastoral care), received ecclesiastical
endorsement by a recognized faith group, been recommended by a Certification Committee, approved
by the commission on Certification, and ratified by the Board of Chaplaincy Certification Inc. Board of
Directors.
The vast majority (91%, n = 21) of the non-Muslim chaplains were employed full time and paid directly
by their hospitals, while two of the 10 Muslim chaplains were employed full time but paid directly by the
state of New York. Fifty percent (n = 5) identified themselves as imams and worked as part time
chaplains. One imam worked as a volunteer, one was paid per-diem, and one was an intern in training.
The median number of licensed hospital beds reported by 52 directors was 382.5 (mean = 477, SD =
259.7), while the median daily patient census for the 43 responding directors was 200 (mean = 241, SD =
167.4). The median daily patients census by faith indicated that the majority were Jewish (median =
32.8, mean = 61, SD = 78.8), followed by Christian (median = 20, mean = 50, SD = 66.1), then Muslim
patients (median = 11.52, mean = 17, SD = 19.7) and others (median = 12, mean = 16, SD =19.3) (Table
1).
Table 1. Hospital Size: Licensed Bed, and Average Daily Patients Census (AD PC) Per Hospital in
General and by Region
Average Patient Census, by hospital in general & by faith Total N
Mean (S.D.) Range
Overall Licensed bed 52 447 (259.7) 100-200
General ADPC 43 241 (167.4) 30-693
Christian ADPC 43 50 (66.1) 0-285
Jewish ADPC 42 61 (78.8) 0-403
Muslim ADPC 43 17 (19.7) 0-90
Other ADPC 42 16 (14.3) 0-60
Total Muslim patients served per year by hospitals **
34 130 (338.2) 0-1800
**39% (n=22) of the 56 hospital directors did not have statistics about Muslim patients or they are
unaware/unsure
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
6 | P a g e
Ninety-one percent (n = 49) of 54 responding directors employed paid chaplains; 75% (n = 35) of 48
reported to hired up to five chaplains-in-training (chaplains who already obtained some training in
chaplaincy services but were not board-certified), 62% (n = 26) of 42 responding directors hired up to
five board-certified chaplains; 89% (n = 46) of 53 responding directors contacted local clergy (including
priests, rabbis, and imams); and 61% (n = 34) of 56 responding directors used staff members (physicians
and nurses) for chaplaincy services. The majority of 47 responding directors (70%, n = 33) reported that
they hired up to 5 full-time paid chaplains, and 47% (n = 22) hired up to 10 unpaid volunteer chaplains.
Based on the survey results of the directors, paid and volunteer Christian chaplains had the highest
median of 2 (mean = 3, SD = 4.0), and 4 (mean= 9, SD = 13.61), respectively. The median for paid and
volunteer Jewish chaplains was one, (mean = 1, SD = 0.8), with Muslim paid and volunteer chaplains
(median = 0, mean = 0.3, SD = .48; median = 0, mean = .67, SD = 1.1) and those of other faiths paid and
volunteers (median = 0, mean = .2, SD = .5; median = 0, mean = 1.25, SD = 2.2), respectively, lagging far
behind (Table 2).
Table 2: Mean Number of Employed Professional Chaplains (EPC) and Volunteer Chaplains (VC) By
Faith
Number of EPl by faith Total N Mean S.D. Range1
Christians 52 3 4 0-21
Jews 51 1 .8 0-4
Muslims 49 .3 .5 0-1.5
Other 49 .2 .5 0-2.
Number of unpaid VC by faith
Christians
44 9. 14 0-66
Jews 43 3 6 0-30
Muslims 43 .7 1 0-4
Other 44 1.3 2. 0-9
11= full-time; 0.5= part-time
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
7 | P a g e
About one-third (35%, n = 17) of 51 responding directors reported that Muslim patients were served by
imams, while 27% (n = 14) reported that they did not know or were unsure how the Muslim patients
were served, or the data was otherwise unavailable.
The availability of adequate prayer space for all faiths was reported by 84% (n = 42) of 56 responding
directors: slightly more than half (51%, n = 28) conducted Friday prayer services for Muslims, 40% (n =
22) reported that their prayer services were not conducted by a chaplain, and 9% reported that they did
not know if services were held.
Major Barriers in Serving Muslim Patients
About 86% (n = 48) of 56 responding directors articulated that the primary barriers to serving Muslim
patients could be classified into six major areas, including language barriers between patients and
chaplains, lack of cultural understanding by the hospital staff regarding the religious rituals and practices
of Muslim patients, perceived fear of prejudices and stigmatization among Muslim patients, the practice
of chaplaincy through a Christian framework, lack of trained Muslim chaplains and access to community
resources that support Muslim patients, and lack of awareness among Muslim patients of the existing
chaplaincy services.
All chaplains described similar barriers to those reported by the directors, and even cited others. For
example, non-Muslim chaplains articulated vulnerability, a lack of identification between chaplain and
patient, and Muslim patients’ fear of discrimination after 9/11 as major barriers to care. One chaplain
stated: “The barriers are related to vulnerability. In New York City, in this climate post 9/11, everyone
tiptoes around the concern of stereotyping. When you’re on the receiving end and you’re sick, you are
vulnerable. It [even] happens with the staff - American patients may not want Islamic staff and vice
versa. Islamic patients may not even identify themselves as Islamic for fear of being treated badly. [We]
get very vulnerable [sick] people in this hospital. When you add the cultural stereotypes, they are even
more vulnerable.” Some non-Muslim chaplains claimed that Muslims generally do not trust non-
Muslims. One linked this distrust to foreignness: “One time a Muslim patient did not want anyone in.
This patient had the most foreign-looking family than anyone in the hospital.” Muslim patients have also
expressed a fear of being proselytized by non-Muslim chaplains; one chaplain spoke of being rejected by
a Muslim woman because she thought Christians “believed in three gods.” Another suggested that a
barrier for many chaplains is the Muslim rejection of interaction with people of the opposite sex.
The board-certified chaplains and all Muslim chaplains interviewed reported that they are trained or
know how to overcome each of these barriers, and how to build relationships and trust over time. They
cite instances of Muslims who eventually responded to them across gender and language barriers
because of their Clinical Pastoral Education training on managing patients, or, in the case of Muslim
chaplains, because of their Islamic affiliation. Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) is interfaith, professional
education for ministry. It brings theological students, qualified laypersons, and ministers of all faiths
(pastors, priests, rabbis, imams, and others) into supervised encounter with persons in crisis.
One Muslim chaplain stated, however, that these barriers are easier to overcome for imams. He said:
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
8 | P a g e
“Once a chaplain was making the rounds and visited a female Muslim patient. He felt that she was not
being receptive to him. He [the non-Muslim chaplain] informed her that there was an imam here, and
she wanted to see him.”
At least three non-Muslim chaplains admit to experiencing barriers from their perspective. A chaplain
wondered if his “being Catholic is also a barrier,” citing his “lack of knowledge, lack of specific training in
Muslim culture and prayer, *and lack of+ comfort level with prayers.” The result is that he has only
“casual conversation, nothing more” with Muslim patients. Another chaplain reports her unease with
some Muslim practices: “Sometimes they have women with the whole black covering where just the
eyes are showing—burqa? This is the only thing that gives me an odd feeling. I find it repressive and
oppressive.” Another chaplain expressed his personal biases towards Arabs and Muslims regarding
politics and religion. “If you read the Qur’an, and I never read it, but I read about it, Mohammad himself
killed a whole Jewish community. But there is no animosity towards them, and on a professional level, I
am a chaplain, and there to take care of their spiritual needs. I am there to help everyone.”
Some non-Muslim chaplains find that volunteer imams are helpful in addressing Muslim patients’ needs,
but tend to perceive them as barriers to caring for Muslim patients. To them, imams were not trained to
conduct pastoral care and unwilling to go through the hospital process for approval. “It’s very hard to
get [Muslim] clergy to comply with specific health care clearance, such as a TB test. An imam will say
that he’s happy to come by, but can’t be bothered with this stuff. The lay people comply; the clergy
don’t.” One chaplain contrasted chaplains and imams: “A cleric’s job is to defend the faith. A chaplain’s
job is to defend the faithful. We look at the needs of the patient in relation to illness. Hopefully we help
strengthen them. We don’t take faith and beat them up with it.” A Muslim chaplain explains the need
for trained Muslim chaplains: “We need to get more clinically trained Muslims—not necessarily imams—
board-certified. They need some clinical training. They need to meet people where they are in their
illnesses. They need to leave out biases, and realize the difference between culture and religion. There
are different cultures but one religion.”
Cultural Competency Training
The majority of the directors and chaplains indicated that chaplains have taken at least one required
cultural competency training session, but that the material was not specific to Islam. Several reported
that cultural competency training is part of Clinical Pastoral Education or pastoral training, which taught
them to treat people from all religious traditions equally. It emphasized asking questions and listening to
patients to learn about Islam. Nearly all associated ‘cultural competency training’ with gaining
knowledge about specific beliefs and practices of people whose traditions are different from their own.
Others used a more informal approach, took the initiative themselves to learn, relied on internet
resources, or consulted regularly with Muslim relatives or local imams to learn more about Islam and
Muslim patients’ needs. One spoke about Muslim physicians who served as cultural educators at the
hospital or as consultants to the pastoral care staff. Two indicated that their hospitals offered in-service
training opportunities specifically addressing Muslim patients’ needs.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
9 | P a g e
DISCUSSION
The majority of directors reported that their hospitals employed up to 5 board-certified chaplains with
the highest mean of 3 certified, while the findings from the interviews indicated that one-third of
chaplains were board-certified, including one Muslim chaplain. This discrepancy may explain the fact
that hospital chaplaincy programs may not be totally capable of meeting the challenges of an
increasingly diverse patient population, and one that requires knowledge of multiculturalism. Common
perceptions of hospital chaplaincy departments are that they are understaffed, lacking in status and
often poorly integrated with other hospital programs; they are essentially services provided without an
associated revenue stream. Chaplaincy organizations often argue that spiritual care provision in most
hospitals is woefully inadequate.37 To assess the gaps, hospitals must determine which group of patients
are receiving adequate spiritual care, which are not, and the reasons for any possible discrepancy.
The qualitative analysis reveals the belief that the provision of religion-specific spiritual care should be
based on demand, as measured by proportional representation in the patient population. But the
results of the quantitative study contradict this rationale. The ratio of full-time Christian chaplains to
the median daily census of Christian patients was found to be 2:20, for Jewish patient was 1:33, while
the ratio of full-time for Muslim and other patients (including Hindus, Buddhist, or patients with no
specific religious affiliations) were 0: 11.5 and 0: 12, respectively. This finding suggests that hospitals
may be providing unequal chaplaincy services, with a bias in favor of Christian patients compared to all
other patients of different faiths. Regarding Muslim patients in New York City hospitals, many directors
reported no knowledge of the number of Muslim patients in their hospitals while having ready estimates
of the number of Christian and Jewish patients. Of those with estimates, they reported an average
range of 0 to 90 Muslim patients. One explanation for this is that hospitals may not collect or distribute
adequate data on the religious affiliation of patients who are neither Christian nor Jewish. An
examination of intake forms and admitting practices would help determine if they identify specific
‘other’ religious groups. There may also be a gap in communicating a patient’s religious affiliation to
chaplaincy departments. Further investigation may identify triaging practices by which chaplaincy
departments manage their workload.38
Another interpretation for the low or unknown number of Muslim patients is that Muslims, like many
immigrants, are not hospitalized in numbers proportionate to their presence within the population.
Studies have shown that overall, immigrants have less health insurance, receive lower quality of care,
and use health care services less than US-born populations. 39-40 Some studies attribute this to the fact
that immigrant populations tend to be younger and in better health, or have immigration status issues
that prevent them from accessing healthcare.41
Directors also expressed confidence in accommodating patients’ needs by accessing a local clergy
member upon request. This service may very well fill the gap resulting from understaffed chaplaincy
departments or undertrained chaplains and must be publicized to patients upon admission to the
hospital; many immigrant Muslims were found to have unfamiliarity with existing services in general42
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
10 | P a g e
and chaplaincy in particular.15 But the qualifications of the local clergy members also must be
considered; in the case of Muslim patients, the concept of clergy is actually nonexistent since imams are
traditionally leaders of prayer, and is only loosely translated into ”clergy” in Western societies. Imams
may also need to be trained in chaplaincy to comply with hospital regulations.
In turn, Muslim patients may resist any special services from chaplains due to fear of discrimination,
especially since 9/11. Several non-Muslim chaplains said that Muslim patients tend to refuse, reject, or
mistrust services offered to them. These chaplains attribute such rejection and distrust to several
factors, including the “foreignness” of some Muslim families, fear of “being proselytized by non-Muslim
chaplains,” Muslim perceptions that “Christians are not monotheists,” and rejection of “interaction with
people of the opposite sex.” When Muslim patients mistrust or refuse services offered by Christian or
Jewish chaplains, the latter may be less likely to offer services to Muslim patients in the future due to
the lack of engagement with these patients. The data suggest that chaplains may also interpret such
refusal to mean that Muslims do not need or want chaplaincy services.
Some chaplains believed that a Muslim patient’s family will tend to the patient exclusively and provide
the necessary care without seeking chaplaincy services. This belief is likely to be based on the fact that in
most Muslim societies, members do value close extended family ties, which may serve as a strong social
support system for a patient.43 However, many American Muslim immigrants or converts lack familial
support systems because of immigration barriers, economic reasons, religious differences within
families, and alienation from family and friends, in the case of converts.44 The belief that family provides
the necessary spiritual care for Muslim patients could deter outreach towards Muslim patients who may
need chaplaincy services.
When patients do not receive the level of spiritual and religious care that they require or need, the
physical healing process may be limited.5,7,8 Thus, hospitals may face challenges beyond the medical
conditions they seek to treat. The provision of professional and culturally competent spiritual care
becomes intrinsic to hospital care and knowledge of the demand for and utilization of these services is
imperative. In the case of highly dense Muslim populations in a city like New York, the general lack of
data suggests that an appropriate needs assessment be made and that further studies are required to
address this knowledge gap.
Lack of access to trained imams and language barriers between patients and chaplains were among the
major barriers articulated by the directors and the chaplains. Most chaplains in hospitals are Christian
clergy, yet many of these clergy members are not trained in pastoral care skills such as providing
spiritual assessment, interfaith conversation, and grief counselling to non-Christian patients.45 If
hospitals hire more trained chaplains, would these chaplains be able to provide spiritual care to all those
in need, and be trained to mobilize spiritual resources so that patients cope more effectively? This
question suggests that professional or certified chaplains are not only trained to discuss patient
concerns or provide religious guidance, but also to provide a more supportive context within which
patients can discuss their concerns and maintain their confidentiality. Based on VandeCreek and
Burton’s (2001) definition, certified chaplains are accountable to religious faith groups, the certifying
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
11 | P a g e
chaplaincy organization, their employing institution, and, most importantly, they must demonstrate a
deep commitment and sensitivity to the diverse ethnic and religious cultures found in the American
society.46 This does not mean that professional chaplains should replace clergy. However, they might be
more useful in intense medical environments, especially in the face of medical issues that involve end-
of-life treatment choices. Chaplaincy, in recognition of the diversity of religious rituals related to illness
and end-of-life practices, seeks to continually strengthen its knowledge base in order to provide the
most effective services possible. As more hospitals and other health-care institutions acknowledge the
importance of spiritual care, there is increasing demand for chaplains and clergy members who can
meet all patients’ spiritual and religious needs.47
Regarding the provision of chaplaincy services for Muslim patients, some have argued that non-Muslim-
trained chaplains must be educated in the practice of Islam as it specifically relates to illness and
death.16 Others have argued that chaplains who share a similar ethnic or cultural background with their
patients are more likely to reach their patients.15 Muslim chaplains are limited, however; there are only
two board-certified Muslim chaplains in over 70 hospitals operating in the five boroughs of New York
City, and, according to D. Martino, Membership Coordinator of the Association of Professional
Chaplains, eight board-certified Muslim chaplains in the entire United States (personal communication,
13 July 2009). Results from this study indicate that there are only two imams who are employed full-
time and paid by the state of New York, and 23 non-Muslim chaplains employed through hospitals.
According to the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (2006), there are 1.3 million New
Yorkers speaking more than 100 languages who are being served in New York City hospitals.48 Despite
the diverse hospital staff and the telephone translators in New York City hospitals, many directors cited
language as a barrier to serving Muslim patients. These directors may be referring to the many
languages that the Muslim immigrant population speaks and also to the Arabic prayers that all Muslims
recite regardless of ethnicity. Chaplains may rightfully feel that they are unable to communicate or pray
with the patients they are serving.
Several directors and chaplains also acknowledged their lack of education and the awareness of Islam,
doubts about their ability to discern Muslim needs, and their prejudices about the culture. Some spoke
of the “political tension” around Jewish-Muslim relations with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as
another obstacle to open relationships in chaplaincy care. While these attitudes are acknowledged,
they may still result in unequal care being provided to all minorities and immigrants. Several studies
demonstrate that minority patients perceived higher levels of discrimination in the health care industry
than non-minorities49-50 and this perception may very well lead to patient resistance, thus causing a self-
propelling cycle.
The results of this study raise two major questions. First, what changes should hospitals’ chaplaincy
services systems make to recognize the equal value of different religions and cultures? And second,
how can chaplains accommodate other minority and ethnic groups’ interests, such as the Muslim
patients, without using a uniform approach? Further studies are necessary to address these issues.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
12 | P a g e
Limitations
The findings of this study should be interpreted in light of the following limitations. The study relied on a
small, non-random sample of 56 directors and 33 chaplains, and a sample of imams who are mostly
untrained but serve as chaplains, limited to the five boroughs of New York City. The list of participants
were contacted exclusively from a list provided by The Health Care Chaplaincy and from hospitals’
websites, and excluded other potential community organizations such as mosques and Islamic schools.
In addition, the study was conducted in English and excluded non-English-speaking chaplains. Future
studies on Muslim spiritual needs should also include the perspectives of patients. The transcripts were
analyzed by one coder, which introduces the possibility of subjective bias in interpreting the data. With
greater accuracy in recording, a finer analysis of chaplains’ discourse about Muslim patients would be
possible. The author recognizes that attitudes, opinions, and experiences may be shaped by degrees of
experience and exposure to Muslim patients, and did not attempt to analyze the organization and
triaging practices of chaplaincy services in the study sample. Future studies should better control for
ethnicity and other individual backgrounds within the Muslim community. There may be factors, in
terms of size and composition of the healthcare system, chaplaincy staffing, and Muslim patient
population that are unique to New York City. These limitations potentially constrained the author from
making generalizations based on the findings because the data may not be representative of other
subject populations. A more comprehensive national study could illuminate these factors more clearly.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and by the Muslim Mental
Health Inc. The author would like to thank Dr. Lance Laird for his helpful comments, and Ms. Tricia
Moscato for her assistance in reviewing and editing this manuscript.
References
1. Newport F. The Gallup Poll: Questions and answers about Americans’ religion. *accessed 2009 24
December]. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/103459/Questions-Answers-About-Americans-
Religion.aspx.
2. Snapshot of Muslims in America, A Cornell University Study on American Muslims. Retrieved on June
27 from
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Special%20Reports/Different%20special%20reports/Snapshot%20of%20Mo
slims%20in%20America.htm
3. Pew Research Center. Forum on Religion & Public Life. [cited 24 December 2009; updated 2008].
Available from: www.pewforum.org.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
13 | P a g e
4. Koenig HG. Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Canadian Journal of
Psychiatry 2009;54(5): 283-91.
5. Pargament K. The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford
Publications; 1997.
6. Koenig HG, Pargament KI, Nielsen J.. Religious coping and health status in medically ill hospitalized
older adults. J Nervous Mental Dis 1998;186(9): 513-521.
7. Luskin F. Review of the effect of spiritual and religious factors on mortality and morbidity with a
focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulmonary Rehabil Prev 2000;20(1): 8–15.
8. Powell LH, Shahabi L, Thoresen CE. Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health. Amer
Psychol 2003;58(1): 36–52.
9. Wilcox S, Laken M, Anderson T, et al. The Health-e-AME Faith-Based Physical Activity Initiative:
description and baseline findings". Health Promotion Practice 2007 8(1): 69-78.
10. Koenig HG. How religious beliefs and practices are related to stress, health and medical services.
[webpage on the internet]. [cited 24 December 2009]. Available from:
http://democrats.science.house.gov/Medica/File/Commdocs/hearings/2008/Research/18sept/Koenig_T
estimony.pdf.
11. Emblen J, Pesut B. Strengthening transcendent meaning: A model for the spiritual nursing care of
patients experiencing suffering. J Holistic Nursing 2001;19(1): 42-56.
12. Gatrad AR, Brown E, Sheikh A. Developing multi-faith chaplaincy. Arch Dis Childhood
2004;89(6):504-505.
13. The Joint Commission: Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and
Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission, 2010.
14. Engelhardt HT. The dechristianization of Christian hospital chaplaincy: Some bioethics reflections
on professionalization, ecumenization, and secularization. Christian Bioethics: Non-ecumenical Studies in
Medical Morality 2003;9(1):139-160.
15. Hamza DR. On models of hospital chaplaincies: Which one works best for the Muslim community? J
Muslim Mental Health 2007;2(1):65-79.
16. Rassool H. The crescent and Islam: healing nursing and the spiritual dimension: Some
considerations towards an understanding of the Islamic perspectives on caring. J Adv Nursing 2000;
32(6):1476-1484.
17. VandeCreek L, Lyon M. Ministry of hospital chaplains: Patient satisfaction. J Health Care Chaplaincy
1997;6(2):1-61.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
14 | P a g e
18. The World Almanac, New York: World Almanac Books, 2011.
19. Bagby I, Perl PM, Froehle BT. Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). American Muslim:
Population statistics, 2005. Retrieved on 03-31. from http://care-net.org.asp/populationstats.asp
20. Kohut A, Lugo L, Keeter S, Smith G. Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream. New
York, NY: Pew Research Center, 2007.
21. Lubeck P, Britts B. Muslim civil society in urban public spaces: globalization, discursive shifts, and
social movements. In: Eade J, Mele C, ed. Understanding the City: Contemporary and Future
Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001:305-306.
22. Population: The Newest New Yorkers. New York City, Department of City Planning. [webpage on
the internet]. [cited 31 March 2010]. Available at
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/census/nny_overview.shtml
23. Abdulatif CL, Minnite LC. The changing Arab New York community. In: K. Benson K, Kayal PM. eds.
A Community of Many Worlds: Arab Americans in New York City. New York: Museum of the City of New
York/Syracuse University Press; 2002:124-139.
24. Astrow AB, Mattson I, Ponet J, White M. Inter-religious perspectives on hopeand limits in cancer
treatment. J Clinical Oncology 2005;23(11):2569-2573.
25. Athar S. 25 Most Frequently Asked Questions About Islam, 7th ed. Indianapolis: Dawa Information
Group,1995.
26. al Mousawi M, Hamed T, Matouk H. Views of Muslim scholars on organ donation and brain death.
Transplant Proc 1997;29(8):3217.
27. Sheikh A. Should Muslims have faith based health services? British Med J 2007;334(1): 74.
28. Hamdy S. Rethinking Islamic legal ethics in Egypt’s organ transplant debate. In: Brockopp EJ, Eich T,
eds. Muslim Medical Ethics: From Theory to Practice. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press,
2008:78-96.
29. Abu-Ras W, Abu-Bader S. The impact of the September 11th attacks upon the well-being of Arab
Americans in New York City. J Muslim Mental Health 2008;3(2):219-242.
30. Abu-Ras W, Abu-Bader S. Risk factors for posttraumatic stressdisorder (PTSD): The case of Arab- &
Muslim-Americans, post-9/11. J Immigrant & Refugee Studies 2009;7(4):393-418.
31. Canikar L. Post 9/11 domestic policies affecting U. S. Arabs and Muslims: A brief review.
Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 2004;24(1):245-248.
32. Abu-Ras W. Cultural beliefs and utilization of services by Arab immigrant battered women. Violence
Against Women 2007;13(10):21-28.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
15 | P a g e
33. Haque A. Psychology from Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and
challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. J Religion Health 2004;43(4):357-377.
34. Abu-Ras W, Gheith A, Cournos F. Imams’ role in mental health promotion: A study at 22 mosques
in the New York Muslim community. J Muslim Mental Health 2008;3(2):157-178.
35. Ali O, Milstein G, Marzuk P. The imam’s role in meeting the counseling needs of Muslim
communities in the United States. Psychiatric Services 2005;56(1):202–205.
36. ATLAS.ti. Version 5.5.9. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti GmbH 2008
37. Jacobs, M. R. (2008). What Are We Doing Here? Chaplains in Contemporary Health Care. The
Hastings Center Report, 38 (6), 15-18.
38. Schmidt KW, Egler G. A Christian for the Christians a Muslim for the Muslims? Reflections on a
Protestant view of pastoral care for all religions. Christian Bioethics 1998;4(3):239-256.
39. Ku L, Matani S. Left out: Immigrants’ access to health care and insurance. Health Affairs
2001;19(2/3):247-256.
40. Derose KP, Escarce J, and Lurie N. Immigrants and health care: Sources of vulnerability. Health
Affairs 2007;26(5):1258-1268.
41. Thamer M, Richard C, Casebeer AW, Ray NF. Health insurance coverage among foreign-born US
residents: the impact of race ethnicity and length of residence. Amer J Pub Health 1997;87(1):96-102.
42. Abu-Ras W. Barriers to services for Arab immigrant battered women in a Detroit suburb. J Social
Work Res Eval 2003;4(1):49-66.
43. Kulwicki A, Miller J, and Schim, SM. Collaborative partnership for culture care: Enhancing health
services for the Arab community. J Transcultural Nursing 2001;11(1):31-39.
44. Larson W. Critical contextualization and Muslim conversion. Internat J Frontier Missions
1994;13(4):189-191.
45. Leavery G, Loewenthal K. Challenges to sanctuary: The clergy as a resource for mental health care
in the community. Soc Sci Med 2007,65(3):548-59.
46. VandeCreek L, Burton L. Professional chaplaincy: its role and importance in healthcare. J Pastoral
Care 2001;55(1): 81–97.
47. McClung E, Grossoehme D, Jacobson A. Collaborating with chaplains to meet spiritual needs.
MEDSURG Nursing 2006;15(3):147-156.
48. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Report to the Community. [webpage on the
internet]. [cited 2008 24 May]. Available from: http://www.nyc.gov/hhc.
TOPICS IN INTEGRATIVE HEALTH CARE [ISSN 2158-4222] – VOL 2(2) June 30, 2011
16 | P a g e
49. LaVeist T, Nickerson, K, Bowie, J. Attitudes about racism medical mistrust and satisfaction with care
among African American and white cardiac patients. Med Care Res Rev 2000; 57(1):146-161.
50. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in
health care. Institute of Medicine Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2003.