1
CHAPTER 1
OVERVIEW OF RELAXOR FERROELECTRIC
MATERIALS
1.1 INTRODUCTION
ICE (Information Communication and Entertainment) era provides
constantly developing environment which is steered by technological
innovations. To face the challenges and for the development of civilization it
demands new materials. Piezoelectric materials are the promising tool for
many modern technologies, in particular data storage, photonics, spintronics,
energy conversion, actuators and transducers. An active research exists for the
development of new actuator materials and optimization of properties for
numerous applications. Relaxor ferroelectric materials are the key
components in signal processing devices, transducers and ultrasonic motors.
1.2 PIEZOELECTRICITY
Piezoelectricity is a property possessed by a selected group of materials. It was discovered in 1880 by Jacques and Pierre Curie during their systematic study about the generation of electric charges by the effect of pressure on crystals, such as quartz, zinc blende and tourmaline (Haertling 1999). The name “piezo” is derived from the Greek word piezen, meaning “to press”; hence, piezoelectricity stands for the generation of electricity as a result of mechanical pressure. This can also be defined as electric polarization produced by mechanical strain in crystals belonging to certain classes, the polarization being proportional to the strain and changing sign with it (Cady
2
1946).The piezoelectric phenomena occurs as both direct and converse manner. Direct effect is the polarization of material by the mechanical force and the converse effect is the macroscopic strain by the applied voltage (Jaffe et al 1971). Both these phenomena can be explained by the physical equations (1.1) and (1.2),
= + (1.1)
= + (1.2)
where D is the dielectric displacement, T the stress, E the electric field, S the strain, d the piezoelectric coefficient, s the material compliance and the permittivity. The superscripts indicate a quantity to be held constant.
The origin of piezoelectric effect is related to an asymmetry in the unit cell. According to the lattice structure described by the Bravais unit cell, thousands of crystals in nature can be grouped together into 230 microscopic symmetry types or space groups based on the symmetry elements (Newnham, 1975). Non-centrosymmetric compounds are of particular interest because of their symmetry-dependent properties such as piezoelectricity, ferroelectricity, and second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) behavior. All non-centrosymmetric point groups, except point group 432, exhibit piezoelectric effect. However, only 10 polar crystals in which the direction of the electric dipole is reversible by means of an electric field can be called as ferroelectrics (Xu 1991; Shiv Halasyamani & Poeppelmeier 1998). The interrelation between the non-centrosymmetry point groups and the functional application is shown in Figure 1.1.
1.3 PEROVSKITE STRUCTURE
Among all the structures, perovskites and tungsten bronze are found to have best piezoelectric and ferroelectric characteristics. The perovskite structured relaxor materials are being widely studied. The main
3
advantage of this structure is that, many different cations can be substituted on both A and B sites without drastically changing the overall structure and also complete solid solution can be achieved between many cations over a range of composition (Cross 1987). Anisotropy in piezoelectric properties is large in perovskites compared to all other structures. The perovskite materials can readily undergo phase transitions (Schumacher et al 1995) and their structure is that of mineral perovskite (CaTiO3), which is orthorhombic. The ideal perovskite is centrosymmetric with general formula ABO3 where ‘A’ site cation valence varying from +1 to +3 and ‘B’ site is occupied by the cations of valence +3, +4 or +5. The schematic representation of ABO3 type perovskite is shown in Figure 1.2 where the B-site ion is in the body center position, A-site cations are in the cubic corner position and the oxygen atoms are at the face centered position and form an octahedron around the B-site (Lee et al 2002).
Figure 1.1 Venn diagram representing to the property and point group
in non-centrosymmetric crystals
4
To get a stabilized structure there is a size constraints like charge
neutrality constraints. The size constraint is described by the tolerance factor
‘t’ (Galasso 1990). For the perovskite structure,
=( )
(1.3)
where rA and rB are the radii of the A-site cation (in 12 coordination) and B-
site cation (in 6 coordination) respectively and rO is the oxygen ion radius. For
the ideal perovskite system ‘t’ should be in the range of 0.95 to 1.04 for cubic
symmetry and larger for the distorted perovskite system (Shannon 1976).
Figure 1. 2 Ideal perovskite structure
5
1.4
FER
RO
EL
EC
TR
ICS
Ferr
oele
ctric
ity w
as d
isco
vere
d by
Val
asek
in
1921
in
Roc
helle
sing
le c
ryst
als (
NaK
C4H
4O6.4
H2O
) (Ja
ffe
et a
l 197
1). F
rom
then
on
inte
rest
in
fabr
icat
ion
of n
ew f
erro
elec
tric
mat
eria
l is
inc
reas
ing
rapi
dly.
A c
ompo
und
exhi
bitin
g pe
rman
ent
dipo
le
mom
ent
is
calle
d as
fe
rroe
lect
rics.
Ferr
oele
ctric
ity c
an b
e de
fined
as
the
mat
eria
l tha
t con
tain
s on
e or
mor
e po
lar
axes
alo
ng w
hich
spo
ntan
eous
pol
ariz
atio
n ca
n be
dev
elop
ed b
elow
the
Cur
ie
tem
pera
ture
(T c
). Si
mila
r to
pyro
elec
tric
mat
eria
l fer
roel
ectri
c m
ater
ials
hav
e
spon
tane
ous
pola
rizat
ion
and
the
dire
ctio
n ca
n be
rev
erse
d by
the
app
lied
exte
rnal
ele
ctric
fie
ld.
The
arra
ngem
ent
of c
atio
ns a
nd a
nion
s w
ithin
the
ferr
oele
ctric
giv
es r
ise
to d
ipol
e m
omen
ts w
ith i
n ea
ch u
nit
cell,
and
the
resu
lting
pol
ariz
atio
n ca
n be
m
easu
red
via
mat
eria
l su
rfac
e cu
rren
t. A
dist
inct
ive
feat
ure
of
ferr
oele
ctric
m
ater
ial
is
hyst
eres
is
beha
vior
in
pola
rizat
ion
vs. e
lect
ric f
ield
. Spo
ntan
eous
pol
ariz
atio
n ex
ists
eve
n af
ter
the
rem
oval
of
elec
tric
field
and
is
calle
d as
rem
nant
pol
ariz
atio
n, P
r.
At
T ctra
nsfo
rmat
ion
from
fer
roel
ectri
c to
par
aele
ctric
is
happ
enin
g.
Para
elec
tric
phas
e m
ater
ials
w
ill b
ehav
e as
a
norm
al
diel
ectri
c w
ith
no h
yste
resi
s
(Kao
200
4).
Det
aile
d di
scus
sion
abo
ut t
he h
yste
resi
s w
ill b
e fo
und
in l
ater
sect
ion.
1.4.
1Ph
ase
Tra
nsiti
ons i
n Fe
rroe
lect
ric
Mat
eria
ls
Ther
e ar
e tw
o ty
pes
of fe
rroe
lect
ric p
hase
tran
sitio
n, o
rder
-dis
orde
r
and
disp
laci
ve
(Lin
es
&
Gla
ss
1977
). In
th
e or
der-
diso
rder
ty
pe
of
ferr
oele
ctric
s, th
ere
is a
dip
ole
mom
ent i
n ea
ch u
nit c
ell.
At h
igh
tem
pera
ture
thes
e di
pole
s are
in ra
ndom
dire
ctio
ns a
nd lo
wer
ing
the
tem
pera
ture
ther
e w
ill
be p
hase
tra
nsiti
on w
here
the
dip
oles
will
ord
erly
arr
ange
d an
d w
ithin
a
dom
ain
all t
he d
ipol
es a
re p
oint
ing
tow
ards
the
sam
e di
rect
ion.
Thi
s ty
pe o
f
trans
ition
ca
n be
ob
serv
ed
in
hydr
ogen
bo
nded
fe
rroe
lect
ric
mat
eria
ls
(Kat
rusi
ak e
t al
200
2; W
ang
et a
l 20
09).
The
disp
laci
ve t
rans
ition
can
be
6
understood in terms of polarization catastrophe, in which, if an ion is
displaced from equilibrium position, the force from the local electric fields
due to the ions in the crystal increases faster than the elastic-restoring forces.
This leads to an asymmetrical shift in the equilibrium ion positions and hence
to a permanent dipole moment. Ionic crystals such as barium titanate (BT) are
displacive ferroelectrics (Ishihara 2010).
Ferroelectric materials will undergo second order or first order
transition. The second order phase transition is characterized by gradual
reduction of spontaneous polarization (Ps), with increase in temperature and
becoming zero at Tc and above. Transition in tri glycine sulphate is second
order type (Jona & Shirane 1962). Whereas in the first order transition there
will be a discontinuous reduction of Ps to zero at Tc. Barium titanate
undergoes first order transition (Merz 1954). The first and second order
transitions are explained schematically in Figure 1.3.
Figure 1.3 Polarization as a function of temperature in (a) first and (b)
second order phase transition
1.4.2 Polarization
Spontaneous polarization is due to the ordering of dipoles under the
influence of internal process in a dielectric material without the effect of
7
external factors. Polarization occurs due to several atomic mechanisms. The
total polarization (Ptotal) can be written as,
Ptotal = Pe + Pi + Po + Psc (1.4)
where Pe, Pi, Po and Psc corresponds to electronic, ionic, orientational and
space charge polarization respectively (Bottger 1962; Barsoum 1997).
Electronic polarization (Pe): The electric field causes deformation or
translation of the originally symmetrical distribution of the electron clouds of
atoms or molecules. This is essentially the displacement of the outer electron
clouds with respect to the inner positive atomic cores.
Atomic or ionic polarization (Pi): In ionic lattice, the positive ions are
displaced in the direction of an applied field while the negative ions are
displaced in the opposite direction, giving a resultant (apparent) dipole
moment to the whole body.
Orientational polarization (Po): Polarization arising from the orientation of
molecules which have permanent dipole moments and these dipole moments
are due to the asymmetric charge distribution. It is also known as dipole
polarization.
Space charge polarization (Psc): At higher fields, carrier injection becomes
important. For materials consisting of a high concentration of charge
carriers, polarization due to the migration of charge carriers to form
space charges at interfaces or grain boundaries becomes important. This type
of polarization is called space charge polarization.
The polarization is not constant rather it will vary with respect to
the measuring frequency (Bottger 1962). The variation of polarization for the
frequency is given in Figure 1.4.
8
Figure 1.4 Frequency dependence of polarization (Ralls et al 1976)
1.4.3 Ferroelectric Hysteresis
The polarization of piezoelectric materials varies in a closed curve,
called the hysteresis loop. This behavior is distinguished the ferroelectrics
from other normal dielectric materials. The observation of hysteresis loop is
still frequently used for the identification of ferroelectrics. The rectangularity
of the hysteresis loop is the main requirement for memory cells. The linear
relationship between the electric field and the polarization is given by,
(1.5)
where and are the vacuum dielectric permittivity (8.854 × 10-12 F/m)
and susceptibility of the material respectively. Typical ferroelectric hysteresis
loop is shown in Figure 1.5.
9
Figure 1.5 Ferroelectric hysteresis loop
As the electric field (E) strength increases, number of domains with
different polarizations direction will switch towards the field direction,
producing a rapid increase in polarization (AB). When all the domains are
aligned in the field direction saturation is reached (BC). At this saturation
state, appropriately oriented crystals will be composed of a single domain.
The extrapolation of linear segment on the polarization axis represents the
saturation polarization, Ps (CBE). As the field strength decreases, the
polarization will decrease but does not go back to zero (BD). When the field
is reduced to zero, some of the domains will remain aligned and the material
will exhibit remnant polarization (Pr). Field required to remove the Pr or to
reduce the polarization back to zero is called coercive field (Ec). Further
increase of field in the negative direction will cause dipole alignment in this
direction and the cycle can be completed by reversing the field direction (Jona
& Shirane 1962; Xu 1991).
10
1.4.4 Ferroelectric Domains
Ferroelectric materials are composed of domains which is a small
region with uniform polarization. Usually in ferroelectric material there are
many domains and the direction is different for neighboring domains. In a
single domain all the dipoles are aligned in the same direction and this
direction can be reversed by the external electric field. The net polarization
along one particular direction will depend on the ratio of oppositely aligned
domains along that direction. If they are in equal volume then the net
polarization is zero. The domains are separated by the domain walls. The
change in dipole moment can be brought by change in the temperature and by
external electric field. This results in domain wall movement, the nucleation
and growth of new domains (Lines & Glass 1977; Landauer 1957). The
ferroelectric domains were first demonstrated in the study of spontaneous
birefringence (Matthias & von Hippel 1948). Ferroelectric domain structure
can be observed by second harmonic generation (Miller 1964), etching, SEM
(Jona & Shirane 1962), liquid crystal method (Furuhata & Toriyama 1973)
and TEM (Wallace 1970). The usefulness of each technique varies from one
material to another with the shape, size and transparency of the material. The
structure of the domains depends on the structure of the crystal. In a single
crystal there is variety of domain patterns and the number of types of domain
walls depends on the number of orientations of the dipole moment when the
spontaneous polarization occurs. Domain structure is strongly dependent on
the symmetry of the ferroelectric phase.
1.4.5 Poling
Single crystals or poly crystalline ferroelectric materials are having
multiple domains. A single domain can be obtained by domain wall motion
which is possible by the application of an appropriate electric field. A very
strong field that could reverse the polarization in the domain is called as
11
poling or polarization switching (Gray 1947). Simply, the process of
applying electric field to a ferroelectric material in order to orient the dipoles
in same direction is called poling. As already discussed when the electric field
increases, the polarization is also increasing, as the alignment of dipole in the
same direction is boosted. When all the dipoles are aligned in the same
direction maximum polarization value is attained and the material is said to be
saturated then the electric field is reduced to zero. Though the applied electric
field is decreased to zero the dipoles are still aligned in the direction of
applied field with some relaxation due to the remnant polarization. The dipole
behavior during poling is schematically explained in Figure 1.6. The random
orientation of dipoles is represented by the Figure 1.6 (a). At the maximum
field all the domains are aligned in the field direction and the material is said
to be saturated (Figure 1.6 (b)). Even after the removal of external field the
dipoles are aligned in the field direction but with some relaxed orientation
depending on the material property (Figure 1.6 (c)).
Figure 1. 6 Orientation of dipoles in the ferroelectric materials (a)
absence of electric field (b) under electric field and (c) after
removal of electric field
1.5 RELAXOR FERROELECTRICS
Relaxation means a system’s monotonous approach to the
equilibrium state after some excitation. In the case of dielectric relaxation one
12
should consider the response of polarization to an external (usually small)
electric field (Alexei et al 2012). Relaxor ferroelectric or relaxors are a class
of disorder ferroelectrics possessing peculiar structure and properties. At high
temperature they exist in a non-polar paraelectric phase which is similar to the
paraelectric phase of ferroelectric in all the aspects. Upon cooling they
transform into ergodic relaxor state in which polar regions of nanometer size
with randomly distributed directions of dipole moments appear. The
temperature corresponds to the transformation is called Burn’s temperature
(TB). At temperature close to TB polar nano regions (PNR) are mobile and
their behavior is ergodic. On cooling, their dynamics slows down enormously
and at low temperature, Tf (freezing temperature) the PNR become frozen.
Freezing of the dipoles dynamics is associated with a large and wide peak in
the temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ( ) with characteristic
dispersion observed at all frequencies. This peak is of the same order of
magnitude as the peaks at Tc in normal ferroelectric perovskites, but in
contrast to normal ferroelectric it is highly diffusive and its temperature Tm(>
Tf) shifts with frequency due to dielectric dispersion. Because of the
diffuseness in the dielectric anomaly relaxors are often called “ferroelectrics
with diffuse phase transition” though no structural transition really occurs
(Bokov & Ye 2006).
Compositional disorder is the common feature of relaxors i.e. the
disorder in the arrangement of different ions on the crystallographic sites.
The relaxor behavior due to the disorder of non-isovalent ions was first
observed in the perovskite compounds e.g. Pb(Mg1/2Nb2/3)O3 (PMN- lead
magnesium niobate) (Smolenskii et al 1961) and Pb(Sc1/2Ta1/2)O3 (PST- lead
scandium tantalate) (Chu et al 1993). In which Mg2+, Sc3+, Ta5+ and Nb5+ ions
are fully or partially disordered in B-sub lattice of ABO3 perovskite.
13
Relaxor ferroelectric (RFE) includes large group of solid solutions
mostly oxides, with a perovskite or tungsten bronze structure (Kleemann
2006). Relaxors are differentiated from the normal ferroelectrics by the
following properties (Samara 2003),
The P–E hysteresis loop is the signature of a FE in the low
temperature FE phase. The large remnant polarization, Pr, is a
manifestation of the cooperative nature of the FE
phenomenon. A relaxor, on the other hand, exhibits a so-
called slim loop. For sufficiently high electric fields the nano
domains of the relaxor can be oriented with the field leading
to large polarization; however, on removing the field most of
these domains re-acquire their random orientations resulting in
a slim hysteresis loop. Figure 1.7 represents the hysteresis
behavior of RFE and FE materials.
The saturation and remnant polarizations of a FE decreases
with increasing temperature and vanishes at the Curie
temperature (Tc).The vanishing of polarization at Tc is
continuous for a second-order phase transition and
discontinuous for a first-order transition which implies the
absence of polar domains above Tc. By contrast, the field-
induced polarization of a relaxor decreases smoothly through
the dynamic transition temperature Tm and retains finite values
to rather high temperatures and it is shown in Figure 1.8.
The static dielectric susceptibility or dielectric constant of a
FE exhibits a sharp, narrow peak at Tc. The FE response is
frequency independent in the audio frequency range. By
contrast a relaxor exhibits a very broad dielectric peak and
14
strong frequency dispersion in the peak temperature (Tm) and
in the magnitude of below Tm. The broad peak is also referred
to as a ‘diffuse phase transition’ and is associated with
compositional fluctuations leading to many micro FE regions
with different compositions and Tc’s. The sharp transition in
barium titanate (BT) and diffuse transition in PMN single
crystals are shown in Figure 1.9 (Kaatze 2010).
Figure 1.7 Hysteresis behavior in (a) ferroelectric and (b) relaxor
materials (Samara 2003)
The temperature dependence of FE obeys a Curie–Weiss law,
above Tc. By contrast the relaxor exhibits strong deviation
from this law for temperatures above Tm and obeys the
modified Curie-Weiss law. Only at very high temperatures the
linear 1/ versus T response is obtained.
15
Figure 1.8 Polarization vs. temperature in (a) ferroelectric and (b)
relaxor materials (Samara 2003)
The FE transition can be thermodynamically first or second
order and involves a macroscopic symmetry change at Tc.
Transparent FE exhibits a strong optical anisotropy across Tc.
By contrast, there is no structural phase transition across Tm in
a relaxor. This was evidenced by X-ray and neutron
diffraction studies (de Mathan et al 1991). The peak is simply
a manifestation of the slowing down of the dipolar motion
below Tm. For transparent relaxors, there is no optical
anisotropy across Tm. In addition, the relaxor ferroelectric
materials are having ferroelectric to antiferroelectric transition
at Td, called depolarization temperature.
The above discussion makes it very clear that the properties and
physics of relaxors are very different from those of normal FEs.
16
Figure 1.9 (a) Sharp transition in BT and (b) diffuse transition in PMN
single crystals (Kaatze 2010).
By considering the above points it is concluded to reflect the
occurrence of relaxor behavior in perovskites, there appears to be two
essential ingredients (Lu 2004; Gupta & Viehland 1996),
Existence of lattice disorder
Existence of PNR at temperature much higher than Tm
Substitution of ions in A and B site of the ABO3 perovskite with
different polarizabilities, valence state and size will sufficiently produce
dipolar defects. It can leads to high degree of disorder to break the
translational symmetry thereby prevent the formation of long range order.
This supports the formation of PNR (Dai et al 1996). The difference in ionic
radius, electronegativity and valence state in the A and B site can induce
enough charge fluctuation, vacancies and local ordering to introduce the
relaxor property (Chu et al 1993). The existence of nano polar regions has
also been evidenced by TEM (Randall & Bhalla 1989), diffuse X-ray
scattering and neutron diffraction studies (de Mathan et al 1991).
17
Very high response coefficient and an enhanced width of the high
response regime around the ordering temperature Tm (Curie range) make
relaxor as popular systems for application in piezoelectric/ electrostrictive
actuators & sensors (e.g. scanning probe microscopy, ink jet printer, adaptive
optics, micromotors, vibration sensors/attenuators, Hubble telescope
correction etc.) electro or electro optic and photo refractive elements
(segmental displays, modulators, image storage, holographic data storage,
etc.) (Kleemann 2006)
1.5.1 Relaxor Theories
Ferroelectrics provide a convenient system to study the general
properties of phase transitions. Normal ferroelectrics undergo a sharp phase
transition at the Curie temperature. Above TC, each atom within the unit cell
is located on a high symmetry position with no net dipole moment. Atoms are
free to vibrate about these equilibrium positions, exciting the various acoustic
and optical phonon modes.
The origin for diffuse phase transition in RFE is not yet clear. To
explain the relaxor properties various physical models such as
superparaelectric model, order-disorder model, microdomain and
macrodomain switching model, dipolar glass model and quenched random
field model have been proposed by many researchers.
In PMN, Smolenskii et al (1959) believed that the relaxor property
is due to the compositional fluctuation which raises local field variation. But
this model failed to explain the relaxor nature where there is no compositional
fluctuation. Burns & Dacol (1983) proposed the dielectric behavior of RFE
is mainly dependant on concentration of dipole moment of the PNR. They
observed the deviation from the linear response of refractive index with
temperature which is attributed to the nucleation of dipolar nano regions at
18
TB. Also they found the TB is very close to the temperature where the classical
Curie-Weiss law starts to deviate.
Dipolar glass-like behavior is another possible model. Viehland et
al (1990) showed evidence for glassy behavior by analyzing the dielectric
response using the Vogel-Fulcher relationship which also implies activated
dynamics. The glassy nature was believed to be due to the randomly oriented
dipolar fields, and the evidence was seen in the very slow dynamics. Bell
(1993), explained the dielectric behavior is based on ideal superparaelectrics
by considering an ensemble of independent, identical, nano-sized
superparaelectric clusters, with a distribution on the size of the clusters.
Taking the temperature dependent of cluster sizes and interactions into
considerations, the calculations was carried out by employing Landau-
Ginsberg-Devonshire formalism to determine the dielectric function of
clusters.
Lu & Calvarin (1995) assumed an exponential distribution of the
size of polar regions. The model predicts that the dielectric absorption always
increases with increasing frequency, which contradicts the experimental
results in the low-temperature range. Cross proposed the superparaelectric
model for relaxors (Cross 1987). Similar to the superparamagnetic state, it
involves polar micro regions that are dynamically disordered above Tm, the
mean Curie temperature of the different regions. Cations continuously flip
between equivalent directions, activated by thermal energy. The heterogeneity
caused by the mixed B-site creates locally favorable directions, so the local
symmetry is lower than the global. However, the energy barrier separating the
different directions are small, so macroscopic polar domains never form as in
normal ferroelectrics.
Power law model was proposed by Cheng et al (1996). To explain
the behavior of polar clusters, they have proposed a relation between
19
frequency and dielectric constant much lower and higher than Tm by two
exponential functions. The analysis at high temperature gives the information
about production rate and concentration of polar cluster whereas the low
temperature range gives the idea about the freezing temperature. Kleeman
(2006) reported that the substitutional charge disorder giving rise to quenched
electric domain-fields is probably the origin of the peculiar behavior of
relaxor ferroelectrics and proposed that the PMN broad phase transition is due
to the random field interactions which also cause freezing into nanometric
domains.
Samara & Venturini (2006) reported the influence of hydrostatic
pressure on the dielectric properties of compositionally disordered ABO3
perovskites. It has been the discovery of a pressure induced FE to RFE
crossover making the RFE state, the ground state, of these materials at
reduced volume. They have observed that the pressure favors the RFE state
and biasing fields favor the FE state. The combined results provide new
insights into the physics and can be explained in terms of changes in the
correlation length for dipolar interaction among the PNR that exist in these
disordered materials.
1.6 LEAD BASED AND LEAD FREE RELAXOR
FERROELECTRIC MATERIALS
Relaxor behavior has been extensively studied in lead based
complex perovskite systems. All commercially used perovskite piezoelectric
materials are lead based compounds. Smolenskii et al (1959) discovered
relaxor properties in the complex perovskite with general formula A(B B )O3.
The compounds are named as lead complex if A-site is occupied by Pb ions.
The synthesis of B-site modified Pb complexes was first attempted by
Galasso & Pyle (1963) and Galasso & Pinto (1965). Since then lead zirconate
20
titanate (PZT), lead lanthanum zirconate titanate (PLZT), and lead
magnesium niobate (PMN) have been developed and utilized for a variety of
applications. PZT and PMN dominated the world of piezoelectrics because of
its strong piezoelectric effect especially at the composition near the
morphotropic phase boundary (MPB). Beside PZT, some newer generation of
lead based piezoelectrics that exhibit piezoelectric properties were also
created by combining PbTiO3 (PT) with some lead based ferroelectrics such
as Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3 (PZN) and Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 (PMN) to form solid
solutions. The piezoelectric coefficient, d33, of the <001>-cut PZN-PT single
crystal with the near-MPB composition (10% PT) is as high as 2500 pC/N
(Kuwata et al 1982) and for PMN-PT crystals with MPB compositions
(35% PT) is 1500 pC/N (Xu et al 2003). Moreover, these materials also
show very high dielectric constants at room temperature owing to the
broadening of the permittivity peak around the Curie temperature.
Though they exhibit interesting properties, the damaging effects of
lead on neuro and kidney toxicity have long been recognized. Lead exposure
has been linked to the Alzheimer’s diseases and the processing waste from the
consumer products poses a great threat to the developing nervous system in
young children. Exposure to lead is known to cause decreased intelligence,
reading disabilities and motor skills. The toxicity of the lead oxide and its
high vapor pressure during processing has resulted in an increasing demand
for the alternative materials with reduced toxicity (Juberg et al 1997).
The research is motivated towards the lead free relaxor ferroelectric
materials around the globe. Among all the lead free piezoelectric material,
more attention has been paid to bismuth layered and the perovskite structure.
The structure consists of perovskite layers and (Bi2O2)2+ layers. The
perovskite layers are sandwiched by (Bi2O2)2+ layers. It usually have high
Curie temperatures (600 ~ 900 ), much higher than those of the lead-based
21
materials (200 ~ 400 ), making them as a good candidate for applications
at high temperatures. But the anisotropic nature of their structures, the
switching of the spontaneous polarization within the materials during
poling is limited within a two dimensional plane which results poor
piezoelectric properties (d33< 20 pC/N) (Miyayama & Yi 2000; Takenaka & Sakata 1980).
The perovskite materials possess good piezoelectric properties
compared to bismuth layered structure. The bismuth based perovskites are
said to be the best lead free sources. The “lone pair” of electrons in Bi-
based oxides is believed to form due to the hybridization of 6s and 6patomic orbitals with 6s2 electrons filling one of the resulting orbitals in
Bi oxides. The lone pair is then considered to be chemically inactive, not
taking part in the formation of bonds but strictly active. The hybridization
causes the lone pair to lose its spherical symmetry and is projected out
on one side of the cation, resulting in an asymmetry of the metal
coordination and distorted crystal structures. Thus the stereo chemically
active lone pair electrons results into the displacements of the Bi atoms
from the centrosymmetric to the noncentrosymmetric structure and leads
to polarization, consequently ferroelectricity. Bi based compounds are having
more ion off centering than Pb due to its 6s2 lone pair electrons in Bi3+
(Ravindran et al 2006).
Interestingly, some of the lead free material offer comparable
piezoelectric properties to that of PZT. Many reports are available on bismuth
based lead free systems BaTiO3(BT) (Bechmann 1956), K1/2Bi1/2TiO3 (KBT)
(Popper et al 1957), Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3 (Smolenskii et al 1961), Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3-
BaTiO3 (NBT-BT) (Takenaka et al 1991), K1/2Bi1/2TiO3-BaTiO3 (KBT-BT)
(Elkechai et al 1996), K1/2Bi1/2TiO3-Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3(KBT-NBT) (Makiuchi et
al 2005). Alkaline niobates and its solid solutions are also interesting lead free
materials. KNbO3 (KN) (Matthias & Remeika 1951), NaNbO3 (NN) (Wood
1951) and KNaNbO3 (KNN) (Du et al 2006) are studied by many groups.
22
Among these lead free systems NBT-BT is considered as a suitable
and promising candidate. NBT-BT single crystal were grown by many
techniques like top seeded solution growth (TSSG), Bridgman, flux and metal
strip heated zone method (MSHZM). NBT-BT ceramics were synthesized by
solid state reaction method for the easy preparation. Various additives (La,
Nb, Eu, Co, Ce, K and Mn) are also being used to further improve the
performance of NBT-BT system in ceramic as well as in single crystal form.
The dielectric and piezoelectric properties of NBT-BT single crystals grown
by different methods and NBT-BT ceramics are given in Table 1.1 and Table
1.2 respectively. Figure 1.10 shows the variation of dielectric and piezoelectric properties in lead based and lead free compounds.
Table 1.1 Piezoelectric properties of NBT-BT single crystals grown by
different methods
Growth Method
Material DopantPiezoelectric Properties
References d33
(pC/N)k33 tan
Bridgman0.94NBT-0.06BT
160 2500 0.09Guisheng Xuet al 2005
TSSG 0.94NBT-0.06BT
140 650Wenwei Ge et al 2008
TSSG 0.94NBT-0.06BT
253 1230 0.02Qinhui Zhang et al 2010
TSSG 0.94NBT-0.06BT Mn
80 750 0.30 0.040 Hong Liu et al 2008145 850 0.55 0.025
TSSG 0.94NBT-0.06BT Mn
400 1040 0.24 0.019 Qinhui Zhang et al 2011 483 1090 0.52 0.019
MSHZM 0.94NBT-0.06BT
4900Bubesh Babu et al 2008
Flux0.94NBT-0.06BT Ce
4500 0.068 Bubesh Babu et al 2007 5000 0.030
23
Table 1.2 Piezoelectric properties of NBT-BT ceramics
Material Dopant
Piezoelectric Properties
References d33
(pC/N)k33 tan
NBT-BT 125 580 Takenaka et al 1991
0.94NBT-0.06BT
122 601 0.40 Bao-Jin Chu et al 2002
0.94NBT-0.06BT
155 826 36.7 0.025Chenggang Xu et al 2008
0.94NBT-0.06BT
127 1660 0.048
Wei Zhao et al 2007 CeO2 137 1776 0.028
Nb2O5 90 1063 0.045
Co2O3 149 1150 0.044
0.94NBT-0.06BT
117 776 0.43 0.025
Hui-dong Li et al 2004 La2O3 125 1576 0.38 0.046
Nb2O5 118 1614 0.38 0.046
Co2O5 139 1200 0.46 0.023
Figure 1.10 Comparison (a) dielectric (b) piezoelectric properties of lead
based and lead free compounds (Shujun Zhang et al 2007)
24
1.7 CRYSTAL GROWTH TECHNOLOGY
The elegance and beauty of the crystals are always the source of
delight. Crystals are the unacknowledged pillars of modern technology. A
crystal is defined as a solid with a high degree of long range three
dimensional internal order of the component atoms, molecules or ions. The
process of forming a crystalline structure is called as crystallization. The
growth of crystal is a fascinating experimental exercise and it has been the
subject of considerable interest leading to the large number of scientific
investigations in the field of materials science and engineering, electronics
industry, photonic industry, fiber optic communications and piezoelectric
transducers. This has accelerated the progress in the science of crystal growth
and related topics. The process of crystal growth is a controlled change of one
phase to another phase. This transition may occur from solid, liquid, or vapor.
Depending on the material characteristics like melting point, solubility and
physico-chemical properties appropriate growth method has to be decided.
Three basic steps involved in the process of crystal growth from the
disordered phase are (Govindhan Dhanaraj et al 2010),
Supersaturation Nucleation Crystal growth
The success of crystal growth formation depends on the choice of
solvent since the constituents of the material to be crystallized are dissolved in
a solvent and crystallization occurs as the solution becomes critically
supersaturated. The nucleation is an important phenomenon where the
initiation of phase transformation occurs and the propagation of phase
transition is called crystal growth.
Crystal growth process involves phase transition of the type solid-
solid, liquid-solid and gas–solid. In Table 1.3 the different techniques of the
crystal growth are discussed with respect to the phase transition. Crystals of a
25
particular material can be grown by one or more various techniques and the
choice of a particular technique for growing crystal depends on the material
property and the type of application. Crystallization techniques can be
classified into three main categories depending on the phase transition
involved (Laudise 1970; Rosenberger 1979; Brice 1986).
Table 1.3 Different phase transition in crystal growth
S.No Phase Transition Nature Parameter Yield1 Solid-Solid
(Solid growth) Solid Temperature Solid
Devitrification Strain annealing Polymorphic phase change Precipitation from solid solution
2 Liquid-Solid a) Melt growth Molten
material Decreasing temperature
CrystalBridgman-Stockbarger KyropoulosCzochralski Zone refiningVerneuil
b) Flux growth Solids+ Flux
Decreasing temperature
Crystal(s)
c)Solution growth Solid + Solvents
Low temperature
Crystals(s)Evaporation Slow cooling Boiling solutions
26
Table 1.3 (Continued)
d)Hydrothermal growth
Solid+ Solvent
High temperature andHigh Pressure
Crystal(s)Hydrothermal sintering Hydrothermal reactionsNormal temperature gradient Reversed temperature gradient
e) Gel growth Solution + gel medium
Solution
Low temperature
CrystalReactionComplex decomplex Chemical reduction Solubility reduction Counter-flowdiffusionCrystal(s)+ products
3 Gas-Solid (Vapor growth)
Vapor(s) Solid Sublimation- condensationSputtering Epitaxial processes
In the present work, the flux growth, commonly known as high
temperature solution growth, has been chosen to grow NBT-BT and Nd added
NBT-BT single crystals.
1.7.1 High Temperature Solution Growth Technique
The crystal growth can be divided into two categories (Elwell &
Scheel 1975).
27
Growth from single component- only one chemical
component is present in the growth system
Growth from multi component – another component is added
to the growth system
Primary reason for the addition of second compound is to reduce
the melting point of the growth system. The reduction in the crystallization
temperature is necessary for the material which is having incongruent melting
behavior and having decomposition at high temperature or at high vapor
pressure. The second component is called as ‘flux’- term commonly used to
refer oxides in the process of soldering or brazing which is used to reduce the
melting point. Various fluxes used to grow large size single crystals are listed
in the review of Roy & White (1968). The flux can be an ionic salt or oxides
or the combination of two. In this method materials to be crystallized are
dissolved in a suitable solvent and the crystallization occurs once the
supersaturation is achieved. Nucleation in flux growth is heterogeneous since
it tends to occur either at undissolved solute particles or on the surface of the
container. This requires lesser degree of supersaturation than that required for
homogenous nucleation. The nucleation rate increases rapidly on cooling
below melting point.
The prime advantage of flux growth is that the crystal growth
occurs at a relatively low temperature than the required for the pure melt. It
offers smooth temperature gradient and ease of synthesizing new materials.
Crystals grown at relatively lower temperature are often free from defect and
have better quality when compared to the crystals grown from melt. The
major disadvantage is very slow stable growth rate, the chemical
contamination by substitution and inclusions which may occur as the crystal
are grown in the presence of flux. The size of the crystals which can be grown
is also limited compared with the melt growth.
28
1.7.1.1 Choice of flux
Both physical and chemical properties of the flux are important.
The desirable properties of the ideal solvents are,
High solubility for the crystal constituents
Appropriate change in solubility with temperature, viscosity
Low melting point
Lowest volatility at the highest operating temperature
Low toxicity
Low reactivity with the container
Easy separation of flux without any detrimental effect of
grown crystal
Depending on the crystal property and requirement of size the flux
has to be decided. Solvents having common anion or cation with the crystal
usually make up a good solvent. In the present work, self flux of bismuth
oxide (Bi2O3) has been chosen for the growth of NBT-BT and Nd added
NBT-BT single crystals.
1.7.1.2 Apparatus required for flux growth
The primary requirement for the flux growth is the high
temperature resistive or inductive heating system. As the growth depends on
the cooling environment, high precision temperature controller with good
stability even at high temperature and with slow cooling rate is necessary.
Crystal growth from high temperature solution growth carried out in
containers in the shape of either crucible or ampoules. For most of the oxides,
29
platinum has been used as a container material because of its high melting
point and high corrosion resistance. For the present investigations silicon
carbide (SiC) furnace which can go upto 1400 was used for the growth.
Eurotherm 2604 temperature controller with an accuracy of 0.01 was
employed to control the temperature and platinum crucible was used as a
container.
1.8 CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY
The word ceramic is derived from the Greek word “keramikos”
meaning pottery. Ceramic is an inorganic solid prepared by the action of heat
and subsequent cooling. Ceramics are polycrystalline. In other words, a
ceramic can be thought of as an agglomeration of small crystals (or grains)
fitted together in a random manner in terms of the crystalline orientation
within each individual grain as show in Figure 1.11. Ceramics generally
consist of randomly oriented, single-crystalline grains as basic micro
structural building blocks, which are separated by distinct grain boundaries.
At high temperatures in the late stage of sintering, larger crystalline grains
grow at the expense of the smaller ones via an atom-by-atom epitaxial growth
mechanism. This grain growth process strongly influences the properties of
ceramics. In polycrystalline materials such as ceramics, each ceramic grain
will have properties not unlike that of crystals. Because of grain boundaries
and the crystallographic axes of the grains are randomly oriented, the
macroscopic properties of the ceramic will in general differ significantly from
those of a single crystal.
30
Figure 1.11 Ideal (a) single crystal (b) polycrystalline material
The development of ceramic processing and thin film technology
lead to the emergence of new applications of ferroelectrics. Ferroelectricity in
the form of an electrically switchable spontaneous polarization has been first
observed in single crystal materials such as Rochelle salt and around 20 years
later in polycrystalline ceramics such as barium titanate (BaTiO3). Since then
ferroelectric ceramics have been applied in all areas of engineering in the
form of sensors, transducers, and actuators. Particular examples are high-
dielectric-constant capacitors, piezoelectric sonar and ultrasonic transducers,
medical diagnostic transducers, gas igniters, ultrasonic motors, thin-film
capacitors, or ferroelectric thin-film memories (Haertling, 1999). Ferroelectric
ceramics play an increasing role for actuator and sensor applications in smart
structures. Ferroelectric ceramics are characterized by specific domain
structures, which give rise to intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to the
effective material response.
There are many methods to synthesis ceramics. Some of them are
(David Segal 1997)
Solid state reaction method
Sol- gel process
31
Co-precipitation method
Molten salts
Hydrothermal technique
Liquid phase and gas phase reactions
Polymer pyrolysis
Pechini and citrate gel method
Aerosols and
Emulsions
The conventional synthesis for ceramics is solid state reaction
between oxides and / or carbonates of precursors. Repeated cycles of milling
and calcinations are carried out to achieve the solid state reaction between
precursors. Relatively high temperatures are required for solid state reactions
typically around 1200 because of limited diffusion during calcinations. The
properties of ceramics are greatly affected by the characteristics of the
powder, such as particle size, morphology, purity and chemical
composition. Various chemical methods, e.g. co-precipitation, sol–gel,
hydrothermal and colloid emulsion techniques are used to efficiently
control the morphology and chemical composition of the prepared powder.
The citrate gel process offers a number of advantages for the preparation
of fine powders of many complex oxides as quoted in literature. The
main drawback of this process is the possible formation of carbonate during
decomposition of the polymeric gel. Non-conventional methods are used to
get better homogeneous and reactive precursor powder compared to solid-
state method. Usually Ti-alkoxides and Ti-chlorides are used as the Ti-
metal source in chemical routes. Ti-alkoxides/nitrates are relatively costlier
than oxides and carbonates of Ti (Lu & Wen 1999; Shrivastava et al 2005;
Cross 1994).
32
Compared to all other methods, solid state route is less time
consuming and a cheaper method. Hence the solid state reaction was selected
for the synthesis of NBT-BT ceramics in the present investigations. The
reaction rate depends on
Area of contact between the reacting solids i.e. surface area
and density
The rate of nucleation
Rate of diffusion of ions
The main advantage of this method is that it allows direct reaction
of solids to form a final product. In addition to that, solid state reactions are
simple to perform as the precursors are readily available at low cost. Also the
reactions are “clean”, i.e. do not involve other chemical elements. The main
disadvantage is the need of high temperature, possibility of non-homogeneity
and contamination from the containers. In the present work NBT-BT ceramics
are synthesized by conventional solid state reaction method and their
characterizations has been studied.
1.9 SCOPE OF THE THESIS
The thesis deals with the above discussed properties in NBT-BT
relaxor ferroelectric single crystals and ceramics and is broadly classified into
seven chapters. The first chapter discusses about the overview of
piezoelectric, ferroelectric and relaxor ferroelectric properties. Also the
growth of single crystals from flux method and synthesis of ceramics are
discussed in detail.
In Chapter 2, the growth of NBT-BT single crystals at
morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) composition by flux method is
33
discussed. The grown crystals were subjected to structural analysis and
electrical characterizations.
Chapter 3 presents the influence of Nd on the NBT-BT single
crystals. The growth condition for the Nd-NBT-BT is optimized for the flux
technique. The inhomogenity issues in Nd added NBT-BT crystals are
addressed by structural and optical characterizations. The grown crystals are
studied for structural, optical and dielectric characterizations. The IR emission
is observed for the Nd added NBT-BT single crystals.
Synthesis of NBT-BT ceramics in its MPB is presented in
Chapter 4. The perovskite nature of the ceramics is confirmed by the XRD
studies. The dielectric, P-E loop and piezoelectric studies are performed for
the NBT-BT ceramics.
In Chapter 5, the effect of Swift Heavy Ion irradiation on the NBT-
BT ceramics are discussed in detail. Three different ions O7+ (100 MeV), Ni7+
(100 MeV) and Au9+ (120 MeV) are used to irradiate the NBT-BT ceramics.
The irradiated ceramics are studied for their structural, surface modification
using XRD and SEM. The dielectric, piezoelectric and ferroelectric studies
are carried out before and after irradiation.
Chapter 6 deals with the consequence of magnetic additives like
Mn, Ni, Co, Cr and Fe in NBT-BT ceramics. The synthesized ceramics are in
perovskite nature and the variation of morphology is studied by SEM. The
relaxor nature is analyzed using dielectric pattern. Vibrating sample
magnetometer (VSM) is used to study the magnetic property of the samples.
The Chapter 7 presents the summary of present investigations and
suggestion for future work.