Date post: | 15-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | avis-gardner |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Chapter 10Chapter 10Elections and Elections and
CampaignsCampaigns
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
WHO GOVERNS?WHO GOVERNS?1.1. How do American elections How do American elections
determine the kind of people who determine the kind of people who govern us?govern us?
2.2. What matters most in deciding who What matters most in deciding who wins presidential and wins presidential and congressional elections?congressional elections?
TO WHAT ENDS?TO WHAT ENDS?1.1. Do elections make a real difference Do elections make a real difference
in what laws get passed?in what laws get passed?
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Campaigns TodayCampaigns Today
Campaign tasks Campaign tasks performed byperformed by• Media consultantsMedia consultants• Direct mail firmsDirect mail firms• Polling firmsPolling firms• Political technology firmsPolitical technology firms
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, 2010 House and Senate Campaign Finance Summary.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: Adapted from Federal Election Commission summary reports, January 2009 and May 2009. Dollar figures rounded. Inflation adjustment keyed to consumer price index 1976–2008, 3.74 (i.e., assumes that what cost $1.00 in 1976 cost $3.74 in 2008).
Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns, Figure 10.1 Presidential Campaigns, Spending on Media, 2008Spending on Media, 2008
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.Source: Federal Election Commission, summary reports, May 2009. Figures rounded.
Campaigns TodayCampaigns Today
Better or Worse?Better or Worse?
• Extensive PollingExtensive Polling
• ““High-Tech CanvassingHigh-Tech Canvassing””
• Campaign Spending and Fund RaisingCampaign Spending and Fund Raising
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Campaigns TodayCampaigns Today
Here And AbroadHere And Abroad• In the U.S., elections have two crucial In the U.S., elections have two crucial
phases: getting nominated and getting phases: getting nominated and getting elected. They both require an elected. They both require an individualindividual effort on the part of the candidate.effort on the part of the candidate.
• In most of Europe, the In most of Europe, the political party political party decides who will be allowed to run and decides who will be allowed to run and puts the candidateputs the candidate’’s name on the ballot.s name on the ballot.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Presidential Versus Presidential Versus Congressional CampaignsCongressional Campaigns
Presidential RacePresidential Race More CompetitiveMore Competitive
• Winner usually gets less Winner usually gets less than 55% of the votethan 55% of the vote
Larger Voter TurnoutLarger Voter Turnout Must Rely On The Mass Must Rely On The Mass
Media To Reach VotersMedia To Reach Voters Incumbent Presidents Incumbent Presidents
Are Often Held Are Often Held Responsible For Responsible For Whatever Has Gone Whatever Has Gone WrongWrong
Congressional RaceCongressional Race Less CompetitiveLess Competitive
• Winner usually gets Winner usually gets over 60 % of the voteover 60 % of the vote
Smaller Voter TurnoutSmaller Voter Turnout Closer Contact With Closer Contact With
The DistrictThe District’’s Voterss Voters Even Incumbent Even Incumbent
Congressmen Can Congressmen Can ““Run Against Run Against WashingtonWashington””
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Presidential CampaignsPresidential Campaigns
Running for PresidentRunning for President
• Getting Getting ““MentionedMentioned””• MoneyMoney• OrganizationOrganization• Strategy and ThemesStrategy and Themes
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Lisa Murkowski, a write-in candidate, won a Senate seat in Alaska, the first person to do this in any state since 1954. She defeated the Republican candidate.
g36/g36/ZUMA Press/Newscom
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Political campaigns are hard work, even when you get to fly on the vice president’s airplane
Tomas Muscionico/Contact Press Images
Barack Obama campaigned on the slogan “Change We Can Believe In.”
Stephen Brashear/Getty Images
Getting Elected To CongressGetting Elected To Congress
The Problems Of Malapportionment The Problems Of Malapportionment and Gerrymanderingand Gerrymandering
Winning The PrimaryWinning The Primary
Staying In OfficeStaying In Office
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Two Kinds Of Campaign IssuesTwo Kinds Of Campaign Issues
Position IssuesPosition Issues• The rival candidates have opposing The rival candidates have opposing
views and the issue divides the voters.views and the issue divides the voters.
Valence IssuesValence Issues• The voters are not divided on an The voters are not divided on an
important issue and examine whether a important issue and examine whether a candidate fully supports their view.candidate fully supports their view.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Television and DebatesTelevision and Debates
TelevisionTelevision• Paid Advertisements/CommercialsPaid Advertisements/Commercials• Making the Nightly NewscastsMaking the Nightly Newscasts
DebatesDebates• What effects do they have on elections?What effects do they have on elections?• What risks are involved in televised What risks are involved in televised
debates?debates?
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Politically Speaking: Politically Speaking: Clothespin VoteClothespin Vote
The vote cast by a person who does not like The vote cast by a person who does not like either candidate and so votes for the less either candidate and so votes for the less objectionable of the two, putting a objectionable of the two, putting a clothespin over his or her nose to keep out clothespin over his or her nose to keep out the unpleasant stench.the unpleasant stench.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
In the 1888 presidential campaign, In the 1888 presidential campaign, supporters of Benjamin Harrison supporters of Benjamin Harrison rolled a huge ball covered with rolled a huge ball covered with campaign slogans across the campaign slogans across the country. The gimmick, first used in country. The gimmick, first used in 1840, gave rise to the phrase 1840, gave rise to the phrase ““keep keep the ball rolling.the ball rolling.””
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Alaska Governor Sarah Alaska Governor Sarah Palin debates Senator Palin debates Senator Joe Biden during the Joe Biden during the 2008 campaign.2008 campaign.
Library of Congress
Rick Wiking, Pool, File/AP Photo
MoneyMoney
The Sources of Campaign MoneyThe Sources of Campaign Money Campaign Finance RulesCampaign Finance Rules A Second Campaign Finance LawA Second Campaign Finance Law New Sources of MoneyNew Sources of Money Money and WinningMoney and Winning
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Candidates first made Candidates first made phonographic recordings of phonographic recordings of their speeches in 1908. their speeches in 1908. Warren G. Harding is Warren G. Harding is shown here recording a shown here recording a speech during the 1920 speech during the 1920 campaign.campaign.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
John F. Kennedy and Richard John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon debate during the Nixon debate during the 1960 presidential campaign.1960 presidential campaign.
Bettmann/CORBIS
Paul Schutzer/ Time Life Pictures/ Getty Images
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Figure 10.2 Growth of PACs Figure 10.2 Growth of PACs 1979–20101979–2010
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: Federal Election Commission.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: ABC News/Politics 2010 National Exit Poll, November 2, 2010, reporting data on more than 17,000 respondents.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: ABC News/Politics 2010 National Exit Poll, November 2, 2010, reporting data on more than 17,000 respondents.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Source: Center for Responsive Politics, based on FEC data.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
The figures for 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1996 fail to add up to 100 percent because of missing data.
What Decides the Election?What Decides the Election?
PartyParty Issues, Especially the EconomyIssues, Especially the Economy
• Prospective votingProspective voting• Retrospective voting Retrospective voting
The CampaignThe Campaign Finding a Winning CoalitionFinding a Winning Coalition
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Figure 10.3 The Economy and Vote Figure 10.3 The Economy and Vote for President, 1948–2008for President, 1948–2008
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Notes: (1) Each dot represents a presidential election, showing the popular vote received by the incumbent president’s party. (2) 1992 data do not include votes for independent candidate H. Ross Perot. (3) 2004 value on RDI is projection from data available in December 2004.Source: From American Public Opinion, 5th ed., by Robert S. Erikson and Kent L. Tedin. Copyright © 1995 by Addison-Wesley EducationalPublishers, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc. 2008 update from Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Departmentof Commerce.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Union members were Union members were once heavily once heavily Democratic, but since Democratic, but since Ronald Reagan began Ronald Reagan began winning white union winning white union votes in 1980, these votes in 1980, these votes have been up votes have been up for grabs.for grabs.
At a public meeting, Samuel Joseph At a public meeting, Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama Wurzelbacher challenged Barack Obama on his tax plan and quickly became on his tax plan and quickly became known as known as ““Joe the Plumber.Joe the Plumber.””
AP Images
Al Goldis/ AP Photo
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
a1968 election had three major candidates (Humphrey, Nixon, and Wallace).b Jewish vote estimated from various sources; since the number of Jewish persons interviewed often is less than 100, the error in this figure, as well as that for nonwhites, may be large.c 1980 election had three major candidates (Carter, Reagan, and Anderson).d 1992 election had three major candidates (Clinton, Bush, and Perot).e For 1980–1992, refers to age 60 and over.f For 1988, white Protestants only.g For 1996, refers to age 45 and over.
Sources: For 1964–1976: Gallup poll data, as tabulated in Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, “Changing Patterns of Electoral Competition,” in The New American Political System, ed. Anthony King (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), 254–256. For 1980–1992: Data from New York Times/CBS News exit polls. For 1996: Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 1997, p. 188. For 2000: Exit polls supplied by ABC News. For 2004 and 2008: CNN exit polls.
Figure 10.4 Partisan Division of the Figure 10.4 Partisan Division of the Presidential Vote, 1856–2008Presidential Vote, 1856–2008
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
Sources: Information for 1856–1988, updated from Historical Data Archive, Inter-University Consortium for Political Research, as reported in William H. Flanigan and Nancy H. Zingale, Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 3rd ed., 32. For 1992: World Almanac and Book of Facts 1994, 73.
M E M O R A N D U MM E M O R A N D U MTo: To: Arjun Bruno, National Party ChairmanArjun Bruno, National Party ChairmanFrom: From: Arlene Marcus, State Party ChairwomanArlene Marcus, State Party ChairwomanSubject: Subject: Supporting a National PrimarySupporting a National Primary
In the past few election cycles, our stateIn the past few election cycles, our state’’s role in the s role in the party nomination for president virtually has party nomination for president virtually has disappeared with a May primary date. Several states disappeared with a May primary date. Several states have leapfrogged ahead of us, and party leaders have have leapfrogged ahead of us, and party leaders have indicated that they do not want any more states to indicated that they do not want any more states to move up their primary date. The national party needs move up their primary date. The national party needs to find a way to ensure that all states, large and small, to find a way to ensure that all states, large and small, have a real voice in nominating a presidential have a real voice in nominating a presidential candidate.candidate.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Arguments for:Arguments for:
1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all 1. A single national primary permits equal participation by all states and presents a fair compromise with the increased states and presents a fair compromise with the increased number of delegates that larger states send to the national number of delegates that larger states send to the national conventions, much like the compromises during the original conventions, much like the compromises during the original constitutional debates.constitutional debates.
2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly 2. The nominating process needs to be less costly, particularly when presidential candidates realistically need to raise when presidential candidates realistically need to raise $100 million a year before the general election to be $100 million a year before the general election to be competitive for the nomination. Holding all primaries and competitive for the nomination. Holding all primaries and caucuses on a single day will reduce overall election caucuses on a single day will reduce overall election expenses significantly.expenses significantly.
3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations 3. If the American electorate knows presidential nominations will be decided by each party on one day, then they will be will be decided by each party on one day, then they will be more likely to vote, a significant factor for elections in more likely to vote, a significant factor for elections in which historically, fewer than 20 percent of eligible voters which historically, fewer than 20 percent of eligible voters typically participate.typically participate.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Arguments against:Arguments against:
1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party 1. Each state decides in conjunction with the national party when its primary or caucus will take place, and the federal when its primary or caucus will take place, and the federal system of government designed by the Framers did not system of government designed by the Framers did not guarantee that all states would be treated equally at all guarantee that all states would be treated equally at all times.times.
2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name 2. A national primary would favor candidates with high name recognition and funding to further that recognition and recognition and funding to further that recognition and would severely disadvantage lesser known candidates would severely disadvantage lesser known candidates within the party.within the party.
3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, 3. Even though the general election takes place on one day, voter turnout in the United States still is lower than in other voter turnout in the United States still is lower than in other advanced industrialized democracies, which suggests that advanced industrialized democracies, which suggests that other factors influence who participates.other factors influence who participates.
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
Your decision:Your decision:
Support a National Primary?Support a National Primary?
Oppose a National Primary?Oppose a National Primary?
Copyright © 2013 CengageCopyright © 2013 Cengage
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?WHAT WOULD YOU DO?