Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Chapter 12Environmental
Regulation
Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment
MARIANNE M. JENNINGS
7th Ed.
2 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Nuisance:– Interference with use and enjoyment. – Damages and injunction possible.– Balancing test employed.
• Case 12.1 T & E Industries, Inc. v. Safety Light Corp. (1991).– How did the original owner feel about handling
radium?– What made disposal an abnormally dangerous
activity?
Common Law Common Law RemediesRemedies
3 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Air Pollution Regulation:– Air Pollution Control Act (1955).
– Clean Air Act (1963).
– Air Quality Act (1967/1990).
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
4 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970: – EPA authorized to establish standards. – States required to adopt implementation plans
(SIPs). – EPA approval required for plans. – Economic and technological issues.
• Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977: – Non-attainment areas.– Prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) areas.
5 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• Economic controls for non-attainment areas:– New Plants must have greatest possible
emission control.– All other operations must be in compliance.– New plant emissions must be offset with
reduction elsewhere.– Follows bubble concept. For new plant to
begin operations, its pollution must be offset by reduction in the area.
6 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• Control in PSD areas:– Prevention of significant deterioration.
• EPA has right to review proposed plant
construction.• Plant has to show that there will not be
significant deterioration.
7 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• 1990 Amendments to Clean Air Act: – Focuses on smog, alternative fuels, toxic
emissions, and acid rain.– Federal implementation plan (FIP).
EPA Plan to reduce pollution in cities failing to submit adequate SIP.
– Plans must use maximum achievable control technology (MACT).
8 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• 1990 Amendments to Clean Air Act. – Acid rain covered:
• Sulfur dioxide pollution from factories and coal-fired generating plants.
• Established market for excess sulfur dioxide emissions.
• Affected small businesses such as dry cleaners, paint shops, and bakeries.
9 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Water Pollution Regulation.– Rivers and Harbors Act of 1855:
• Prohibited discharges into navigable waters.• Used for enforcement since other laws had no
teeth.• Most industries got around the act quickly by
obtaining the permits required under the act.
– Water Quality Act of 1965• Created Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration (FWPCA).• States required to establish water quality
standards. • No enforcement procedures—states did little.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
10 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
• Water Pollution Regulation:– Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972.
• Federal government responsible for standards and
control.
• Emissions controlled by industrial groups.
• Ranges for groups referred to as effluent guidelines.
• National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES).
• Renamed Clean Water Act in 1977.
11 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Water Pollution Regulation.– Safe Drinking Water Act.
• Passed in 1986. • States responsible for enforcement but must have
minimum federal standards for drinking water systems.
– Oil Pollution Act of 1990.• Passed in response to huge spills like Exxon
Valdez.• Companies must either clean up spill or pay
federal government its costs for the clean-up.• Applies to all navigable waters up to 200 miles
offshore.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
12 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Solid Waste Disposal Regulation.– Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
• Response to chemical dumping.• EPA controls manufacture and disposal of
toxic substances.
– Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976.• Regulates methods of disposal through a
permit system.• Discourages dumping.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
13 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
SuperfundSuperfund• “SUPERFUND”: Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, & Liability Act (CERCLA).– Suit can be brought to recover funds expended
from company responsible for the dumping.– 1986 amendments Superfund Amendment and
Reauthorization Act. – EPA can now sue to recover clean-up funds
from those who are responsible.
14 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Liability for clean-up cost may extend to lenders.
• Under the Asset Conservation, Lenders Liability, and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1966, lenders are protected from liability so long as they do not participate in the management of the property.
SuperfundSuperfund
15 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Four cases of responsible parties:– Owners and operates at the time of
contamination.– Current owners and operators - whether
they were responsible for the contamination or not.
– Transporters of the hazardous material.– Those who arranged for transport of the
hazardous materials.
SuperfundSuperfund
16 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Environmental Quality Regulation.– National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
• Requires federal agencies to file environmental
impact statements for all major actions (EISs).
– Content of EIS:• Environmental impact.
• Adverse effects.
• Alternatives.
• New effects - short term versus long term.
• Irreversible effects.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
17 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
Environmental QualityEnvironmental Quality
• Case 12.2 Sierra Club v. United States Department of Transportation (1985)– What is the basis for the appeal?
– What has the FAA allowed?
– Is another EIS ordered?
18 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Other Regulations:– Noise Control Act of 1972. EPA and FAA
regulate noise pollution for Aircraft– Surface mining and Reclamation Act of 1977
requires mining company to restore land.– Pesticide Control Act.
• Must register with EPA to ship. • Must label all pesticides.
– Occupational Safety and Health Administration.• Responsible for work place environment and safety
issues.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
19 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Other Regulations:– Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act
(AHERA).• Schools must inspect for asbestos and take
action.• Asbestos is a toxic pollutant and community
right-to-know substance.
• Duty to disclose presence of asbestos.– Endangered Species Act:
• Powerful tool for environmentalists.• Habitats cannot be disturbed.
Statutory Environmental Statutory Environmental LawsLaws
20 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Case 12.3 Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon (1995).– Did Congress intend to give the secretary
authority to shut down an industry?
• Case 12.4 Bennett v. Spear (1997).– Do the ranchers have standing to challenge the
endangered species protection under the ESA?
Endangered SpeciesEndangered Species
21 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
State Environmental State Environmental LawsLaws
• State EPA:– Regulation of fuel used.
– Incentives for carpooling.
22 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
EnforcementEnforcement
• Parties:– Environmental Protection Agency—
EPA.
– Council on Environmental Quality—CEQ. • Part of executive branch. • Sets national policies and makes
recommendations.
23 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Parties:– Other agencies.
• Atomic Energy Commission. • Federal Power Commission. • HUD.• Department of Interior. • Forest Service. • Bureau of Land Management. • Department of Commerce.
EnforcementEnforcement
24 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Criminal Sanctions: – Clean Air Act.
• $25,000 per day, up to one year in prison, or both.• Five years/$1million for knowing violations.• $50,000 for field citations.• $10,000 rewards for reporting violations.
– Clean Water Act:• $25,000 per day, up to one year in prison, or both.
– Resource Conservation and Recovery Act• $25,000 per day, up to one year in prison, or both.
EnforcementEnforcement
25 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Criminal Sanctions:– Oil Pollution Act.
• $125,000 per day or $1,000 per barrel.• $3,000 per barrel if willfully.• $250,000 and/or 5 years for failure to report.
• Civil Liability:– Environmental groups can bring suits.
• Sierra Club. • Environmental Defense Fund. • League of Conservation Voters.
EnforcementEnforcement
26 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Case 12.5 United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc. (1984).– Did Congress intend to prosecute
corporate employees?
– What proof is required to show violations by the “persons” involved?
EnforcementEnforcement
27 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• EU Has European Environment Agency.
• ISO 14000.
• Kyoto Protocol.
• Precautionary Principle.
International IssuesInternational Issues
28 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• Eco-Audit Stickers.– Shows products environmental impact.
– International Organization for Standardization (ISO) developed ISO 14000, a series of environmental standards. Companies seek ISO 14000 certification.
International IssuesInternational Issues
29 Copyright ©2006 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning
• United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCC).– A group of governmental and
environmental leaders concern with the issue of global warning.
• The Precautionary Principle in regulation.
International IssuesInternational Issues