+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of...

CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of...

Date post: 29-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 10 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
68
CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN
Transcript
Page 1: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN

Page 2: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Premix - Materials

Page 3: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

3

Aggregate Gradation

• Distribution of particle sizes expressed as a percentage of

total weight (total % passing various sieve sizes)

• Determined by sieve analysis

• Gradation affect stiffness, stability, durability, permeability,

workability, fatigue, skid, and moisture damage resistance >>

limits on the agg gradation to be used in HMA

• HMA need to have sufficient air voids in grading mix for

durability (permits enough AC to be incorporated) and avoid

bleeding and rutting (yet still have enough air space in

mixture)

• Graphically presented on semi-log graph

• 4 gradations : well (dense), uniform (single), gap graded ,

open graded (air space in mixture)

Page 4: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

4

2. Uniformly graded (single size)• Few points of contact

• Poor interlock (shape dependent)• High permeability•Surface dressing

1. Well graded (dense)• Good interlock• Low permeability• Near maximum density• AC14/AC10/AC28

3. Gap graded• Small % of agg in the mid size range • Only limited sizes• Good interlock • Low permeability• Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA)

Types of Gradations

Page 5: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

NCAT 5

0.45 Power Grading Chart

0 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0

Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power

0

20

40

60

80

100

maximum density line

Percent Passing

max

size

Page 6: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Aggregate Gradation

6

Page 7: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

7

Aggregate Size Definitions

• Two designation for max size

1. Max size

2. Nominal max size

• Mix designations in spec typically use nominal max size

• Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size Largest sieve size that retains some of the

agg, but not more than 10%

• Maximum Aggregate Size Smallest sieve size which 100% of the agg

pass

1001009072654836221594

100998972654836221594

Page 8: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

8

Steps in Gradation Analysis

Mechanical sieve analysis

– Place dry aggregate in standard stack of sieves

– Place sieve stack in mechanical shaker

– Determine mass of aggregate retained on each sieve

Page 9: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

9

Mechanical Sieve

Individual Sieve Stack of Sieves

Page 10: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

10

Mechanical Sieve

Stack in Mechanical

Shaker

Page 11: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Exercise 2.9.1

Page 12: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

12

Sieve Analysis

Analisis Ayakan

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Sieve Size, mm

Perc

ent

Passin

g,

%

Page 13: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall
Page 14: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Aggregate Stockpile

Page 15: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

15

Aggregate Blending

• Two or more stockpile need to be blended to get max density and desired void for HMA (or meet spec envelope)

• Reasons for blending:

1. Obtain desired gradation

2. Single natural or quarried material not enough

3. Economical to combine natural and processed materials

• Normally three or more stockpiles plus mineral filler

• Most common method for determining proportion – trial & error

• Blended aggregate specific gravity

Page 16: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

16

Blending Stockpiles

• Basic formula for combining stockpiles to achieve a target gradation is:

p = Aa + Bb + Cc + ….

where:p = percent of material passing given sieve size for the combined agg

A, B, C, .. = percent passing given sieve for each agg.a, b, c, … = proportion (decimal fraction) of A, B, C, …

to be used in blend, a + b + c +… = 1.00

Page 17: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

17

Trial and Error

• Aided by experience and plots of indiv. gradation curves and spec limits

• Calculated grading compared with spec – adjust until pass

• Guided by reasoning, maths, experience

• Use of spreadsheet now common

Page 18: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

18

Blending of Aggregates

Agg. BAgg. A

Blend Target

Material

%

Passing

%

Passing

% Used

U.S. Sieve%

Batch

%

Batch

No. 4

No. 8

No. 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

No. 200

3/8 “

90

30

7

3

1

0

0

100

100

100

88

47

32

24

10

100

Page 19: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

19

Blending of Aggregates

Agg. BAgg. A

Blend Target

Material

%

Passing

%

Passing

% Used

U.S. Sieve%

Batch

%

Batch

No. 4

No. 8

No. 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

No. 200

3/8 “

45

15

3.5

1.5

0.5

0

0

100

100

100

88

47

32

24

10

100

50 %50 %

First Try

(remember trial & error)

90

30

7

3

1

0

0

50

90 * 0.5 = 45

30 * 0.5 = 15

7 * 0.5 = 3.5

3 * 0.5 = 1.5

1 * 0.5 = 0.5

0 * 0.5 = 0

0 * 0.5 = 0

100 * 0.5 = 50

80 - 100

65 - 100

40 - 80

20 - 65

7 - 40

3 - 20

2 - 10

100

Page 20: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

20

Blending of Aggregates

Agg. BAgg. A

Blend Target

Material

%

Passing

%

Passing

% Used

U.S. Sieve%

Batch

%

Batch

No. 4

No. 8

No. 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

No. 200

3/8 “

80 - 100

65 - 100

40 - 80

20 - 65

7 - 40

3 - 20

2 - 10

100

45

15

3.5

1.5

0.5

0

0

100

50

50

44

23.5

16

12

5

50

50 %50 %

90

30

7

3

1

0

0

50

95

65

47.5

25

16.5

12

5

100

100

100

88

47

32

24

10

100

Let’s Try

and get

a little closer

to the middle of

the target values.

Page 21: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

21

Blending of Aggregates

Agg. BAgg. A

Blend Target

Material

%

Passing

%

Passing

% Used

U.S. Sieve%

Batch

%

Batch

No. 4

No. 8

No. 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

No. 200

3/8 “

80 - 100

65 - 100

40 - 80

20 - 65

7 - 40

3 - 20

2 - 10

100

27

9

2.1

0.9

0.3

0

0

100

70

70

61.6

32.9

22.4

16.8

7

70

70 %30 %

90

30

7

3

1

0

0

30

97

79

63.7

33.8

22.7

16.8

7

100

100

100

88

47

32

24

10

100

Page 22: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

22

Blended Aggregate Specific Gravities

• Once the percentages of the stockpiles have been established, the combined aggregate specific gravities can also be calculated

Combined G =100

P1 + P2 + ……. Pn

G1 G2 Gn

Page 23: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Exercise 2.9.2 and 2.9.3

Page 24: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Mix Design

Design objectives – Develop an economical blend of aggregates

and asphalt that meet design requirements

Historical mix design methods

1. Marshall – use impact hammer

2. Hveem – use kneading compactor, Hveem Stabilometer

New

1. Superpave gyratory – use gyratory compactor to simulate

field compaction, able to accommodate large size aggregate

Page 25: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Mix design methods

Page 26: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Requirements in Common

• Sufficient asphalt to ensure a durable pavement

• Sufficient stability under traffic loads

• Sufficient air voids

–Upper limit to prevent excessive environmental

damage

–Lower limit to allow room for initial densification

due to traffic

• Sufficient workability

Page 27: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Design bitumen content (JKR, 2008)

Mix type Bitumen content (%)

AC10 5-7

AC14 4-6

AC28 3.5-5.5

Page 28: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Volumetric Properties of Asphalt Mix

Page 29: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

29

Aggregate Specific Gravity

• Ratio weight of mat. to water of equal volume at 23C,

useful in making weight-vol conversion

• In metric units, G simply:

G = weight / vol

• Four Gs – apparent, bulk, effective, bulk impregnated

1. Apparent – weight / vol solid …… Dry

2. Bulk – weight / overall vol …… SSD

3. Effective – weight / (overall vol – asp asorb. pores)

4. Bulk impregnated – eff. but immerse in asphalt

Gsb < Gse < Gsa

Page 30: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

30

Gsa =

Mass of oven dry agg

Vol of agg

Apparent Specific Gravity

Page 31: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

31

Gsb =

Vol of agg, + perm. pores

Vol. of water-perm. pores

Surface Voids

Bulk Specific Gravity

Mass of oven dry agg

Page 32: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Gs, eff =Mass oven dry agg

Vol of agg, + perm. pores not absorb. asphalt

Effective Specific Gravity

Surface Voids

Solid Agg.

Particle

Vol. of water-perm. voids

not filled with asphalt

Absorbed asphalt

Page 33: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall
Page 34: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Property When Asphalt cement is varied in mix design

Near optimum asphalt cement

VTM 2.5-8 3-5

VMA 10-16 12-15

VFA 50-85 65-85

•VTM 3-5%

•<3 – rutting, bleeding, loss of friction

•> 5- permebility, oxidation (aging, asphalt get stiffened)

•VMA 13-14

•Low VMA- loss of durability, not enough asphalt.Change in asphalt

cement content could be more critical

•High VMA- loss of strength, increased cost

•VFA- flip of VTM, VTM<3VFA goes up, VTM>5 VFA goes down

Page 35: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

MARSHALL

MIX

DESIGN

Page 36: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Marshall Design Method

• Bruce Marshall, 1939, Mississipi Highway Department, refined-US army.

• WES began to study it in 1943 for WWII

– Evaluated compaction effort

• No. of blows, foot design, etc.

• Decided on 10 lb.. Hammer, 50 blows/side

• 4% voids after traffic

• Initial criteria were established and upgraded for increased tire pressures and loads

Page 37: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix - Material

•Aggregate and bitumen test•Aggregate blend

Page 38: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Course Aggregate

Page 39: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Fine Aggregate

Page 40: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix - compaction

•Sample preparation•Mix 160 ˚C•4 sample at each bitumen content•75 blows/face compaction•Compact 145˚C

Page 41: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix - density

Bulk SG ASTM D 2726

Page 42: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Calculations

• Gmb = A / ( B - C )

Where:

A = mass of dry sample

B = mass of SSD sample

C = mass of sample under water

Page 43: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – Marshall Test

Stability- max load (kN) , loading rate 50.8mm/min Flow- diff sample height (mm)

Page 44: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – Marshall Form

SG and voids analysis

Page 45: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Exercise 2.9.4

Page 46: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

OBC determination

• 4 graphs (JKR, 2008):

– Peak stability

– Peak bulk SG

– VFB= 75% WC, 70% BC

– VTM= 4% WC, 5% BC

Page 47: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – OBC Determination

2.320

2.330

2.340

2.350

2.360

2.370

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

Density (

g/c

u.c

m)

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

Sta

bili

ty (

kg)

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

VTM

(%

)

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

VF

B (

%)

c

a

d

b

Page 48: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – OBC Determination

OBC =(a + b + c + d)/4 = e

Check parameters @ OBC

- Stability- Flow

- Stiffness

- VTM

- VFB

Page 49: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – Value @ OBC

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

Sta

bili

ty (

kg)

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

VTM

(%

)

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

VF

B (

%)

e

e e

Page 50: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Lab Mix – Value @ OBC

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

Flo

w (

mm

)

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

Bit. Content (%)

Stiffn

ess (

kg/m

m)

Compare parameters with specification

Pass? >> OBC = e

Fail? >> redesign

e e

Page 51: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Mix design test and analysis parameters (JKR, 2008)

Parameter WC BC

Stability, S >8000N >8000N

Flow, F 2-4mm 2-4mm

Stiffness, S/F >2000N/mm >2000N/mm

VTM 3-5% 3-7%

VFB 70-80% 65-75%

Page 52: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Exercise 2.9.5

Page 53: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

WHAT IS PREMIX PRODUCTION?

• Premix production is a process of mixing the aggregates and asphalt in the hot mix facilities, to be used as road material regardless whether it’s an ACW, ACB or DBM.

HOT MIX

FACILITES

a) Drum mix

b) Batch mix

Stock Pile Asphalt (Bitumen)

Page 54: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Agregate Stockpile

Page 55: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Premix - Materials

Page 56: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

HOT MIX ASPHALT FACILITIES

Purpose of an HMA facility is to properly proportion, blend, and heat aggregate and asphalt to produce

an HMA that meets the requirements of the job mix formula.

Page 57: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Types Of Plants

BATCH DRUM MIXER

Page 58: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

DIFFERENCE

• drum mix plants dry the aggregate and blend it with asphalt in a continuous process and in the same piece of equipment.

• batch plants dry and heats the aggregate and then in a separate mixer blend the aggregate and asphalt one batch at a time

Page 59: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Drum Mixer Planttypical layout

Storage

Silo

Dryer

Conveyor BeltsAggregate

Bins

Burner

Asphalt Storage

Page 60: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Batch planttypical layout

Storage

Silo

Batch

TowerDryer

Conveyor BeltAggregate

Bins

Burner

Asphalt Storage

Hot

elevator

Page 61: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

61

Drim Mix Plant

Page 62: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

62

DRUM MIX

Page 63: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

Drum Dryer Mixer

Page 64: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall
Page 65: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

65

DRUM MIX

Page 66: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

66

Page 67: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

67

BATCH PLANT

Page 68: CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN · Mix Design Design objectives –Develop an economical blend of aggregates and asphalt that meet design requirements Historical mix design methods 1. Marshall

THE END


Recommended