+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter 2 Learning

Chapter 2 Learning

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: calder
View: 34 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Chapter 2 Learning. Aim: How do we learn? What are the principles of classical learning? Warm-up: How do you teach some one to drive?. Learning. Learning relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience. Association. We learn by association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
52
Chapter 2 Learning • Aim: How do we learn? What are the principles of classical learning? • Warm-up: How do you teach some one to drive?
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 2 Learning

Chapter 2 Learning• Aim: How do we learn? What are

the principles of classical learning?• Warm-up: How do you teach

some one to drive?

Page 2: Chapter 2 Learning

Learning Learning

relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience

Page 3: Chapter 2 Learning

Association We learn by association

Our minds naturally connect events that occur in sequence

Aristotle 2000 years ago John Locke and David Hume 200 years

ago Associative Learning

learning that two events occur together two stimuli a response and its consequences

Page 4: Chapter 2 Learning

Association

Learning to associate two events

Event 1 Event 2

Sea snail associates splash with a tail shock

Seal learns to expect a snack for its showy antics

Page 5: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Ivan Pavlov 1849-1936 Russian

physician/ neurophysiologist

Nobel Prize in 1904

studied digestive secretions

Page 6: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Pavlov’s device for recording salivation

Page 7: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning: Terminology

• helps to explain involuntary behavior

• unconditioned stimulus (UCS)

• unconditioned response (UCR)

• neutral stimulus (NS)

• conditioned stimulus (CS)

• conditioned response (CR)

Page 8: Chapter 2 Learning

Pavlov’s Classic Experiment

Before Conditioning

During Conditioning After Conditioning

UCS (foodin mouth)

Neutralstimulus(tone)

Nosalivation

UCR (salivation)

Neutralstimulus(tone)

UCS (foodin mouth)

UCR(salivation)

CS(tone)

CR (salivation)

Page 9: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning: Procedure

• acquisition– UCS produces a UCR (reflex)– neutral stimulus (NS) paired with a

UCS– after pairings, NS produces a CR– the NS has become a CS

• contiguity – time between CS and UCS

• contingency – is CS regularly followed by the UCS?

Page 10: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning: Pavlov• Unlearned/Reflexive

– UCS – meat powder– UCR – dog salivates

• NS – sound of Pavlov’s bell (prior to pairings with meat powder)

• Learned– CS – sound of Pavlov’s bell– CR – dog salivates

Page 11: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Classical Conditioning organism comes to associate two

stimuli a neutral stimulus that signals an

unconditioned stimulus begins to produce a response that anticipates and prepares for the unconditioned stimulus

Page 12: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) stimulus that unconditionally--

automatically and naturally--triggers a response

Unconditioned Response (UCR) unlearned, naturally occurring response

to the unconditioned stimulus salivation when food is in the mouth

Page 13: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Conditioned Stimulus (CS) originally irrelevant stimulus that, after

association with an unconditioned stimulus, comes to trigger a conditioned response

Conditioned Response (CR) learned response to a previously neutral

conditioned stimulus

Page 14: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Acquisition the initial stage in classical conditioning the phase associating a neutral stimulus

with an unconditioned stimulus so that the neutral stimulus comes to elicit a conditioned response

in operant conditioning, the strengthening of a reinforced response

Page 15: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical or Pavlovian

Conditioning

We learn to associate two stimuli

Page 16: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

UCS(passionate kiss) UCR

(sexualarousal)

CS(onionbreath)

CS(onion breath) CR

(sexualarousal)

UCS(passionate Kiss) UCR

(sexualarousal)

Page 17: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Extinction diminishing of a CR in classical conditioning, when

a UCS does not follow a CS in operant conditioning, when

a response is no longer reinforced

Page 18: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Strengthof CR

Pause

Acquisition(CS+UCS)

Extinction(CS alone)

Extinction(CS alone)

Spontaneousrecovery ofCR

Page 19: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Spontaneous Recovery reappearance, after a rest

period, of an extinguished CR

Generalization tendency for stimuli similar

to CS to elicit similar responses

Page 20: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning

Discrimination in classical conditioning, the

learned ability to distinguish between a CS and other stimuli that do not signal a UCS

Page 21: Chapter 2 Learning

GeneralizationDrops of salivain 30 seconds

60

50

40

30

20

10

0Hindpaw

Pelvis Shoulder Frontpaw

Thigh Trunk Foreleg

Part of body stimulated

Page 22: Chapter 2 Learning

Nausea Conditioning in Cancer Patients

UCS(drug)

UCR(nausea)

CS(waiting room)

CS(waitingroom) CR

(nausea)

UCS(drug)

UCR(nausea)

Page 23: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant vs Classical

Conditioning

Page 24: Chapter 2 Learning

Classical Conditioning: Applications

• Phobias– Watson and Rayner (1920) – Little Albert– white rat (CS) paired with loud noise (UCS)

• Counterconditioning– associate CS with new, incompatible CR– CS paired with new UCS– aversive conditioning

Page 25: Chapter 2 Learning

Behaviorism John B. Watson

viewed psychology as objective science generally agreed-upon

consensus today

recommended study of behavior without reference to unobservable mental processes not universally accepted

by all schools of thought today

Page 26: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

better at explaining voluntary behaviors

the consequences of a behavior change the probability of that behavior’s occurrence

Page 27: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

We learn to associate a response and its consequence

Page 28: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

Operant Conditioning type of learning in which behavior is

strengthened if followed by reinforcement or diminished if followed by punishment

Law of Effect Thorndike’s principle that behaviors

followed by favorable consequences become more likely, and behaviors followed by unfavorable consequences become less likely

Page 29: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

Operant Behavior operates (acts) on environment produces consequences

Respondent Behavior occurs as an automatic

response to stimulus behavior learned through

classical conditioning

Page 30: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

B.F. Skinner (1904-1990) elaborated

Thorndike’s Law of Effect

developed behavioral technology

Page 31: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Chamber Skinner Box

chamber with a bar or key that an animal manipulates to obtain a food or water reinforcer

contains devices to record responses

Page 32: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

Reinforcer any event that strengthens the

behavior it follows Shaping

operant conditioning procedure in which reinforcers guide behavior toward closer approximations of a desired goal

Page 33: Chapter 2 Learning

Reinforcement

Reinforcement increases behavior.

Positive Reinforcement– behavior followed by rewarding consequence– rewarding stimulus is “added”

Negative Reinforcement– behavior followed by rewarding consequence– aversive (unpleasant) stimulus is “removed”

Page 34: Chapter 2 Learning

Operant Conditioning

Page 35: Chapter 2 Learning

Reinforcement

Page 36: Chapter 2 Learning

Principles of Reinforcement Primary Reinforcer

innately reinforcing stimulus i.e., satisfies a biological need

Conditioned Reinforcer stimulus that gains its reinforcing

power through its association with primary reinforcer

secondary reinforcer

Page 37: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Continuous Reinforcement reinforcing the desired response each

time it occurs Partial (Intermitent) Reinforcement

reinforcing a response only part of the time

results in slower acquisition greater resistance to extinction

Page 38: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Fixed Ratio (FR) reinforces a response only after a

specified number of responses faster you respond the more

rewards you get different ratios very high rate of responding like piecework pay

Page 39: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Variable Ratio (VR) reinforces a response after an

unpredictable number of responses

average ratios like gambling, fishing very hard to extinguish because of

unpredictability

Page 40: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Fixed Interval (FI) reinforces a response only after

a specified time has elapsed response occurs more

frequently as the anticipated time for reward draws near

Page 41: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Variable Interval (VI) reinforces a response at

unpredictable time intervals produces slow steady responding like pop quiz

Page 42: Chapter 2 Learning

Schedules of Reinforcement

Variable Interval

Number of responses

1000

750

500

250

010 20 30 40 50 60 70

Time (minutes)

Fixed Ratio

Variable Ratio

Fixed Interval

Steady responding

Rapid respondingnear time forreinforcement

80

Page 43: Chapter 2 Learning

Punishment

Punishment aversive event that

decreases the behavior that it follows

powerful controller of unwanted behavior

Page 44: Chapter 2 Learning

Punishment

Page 45: Chapter 2 Learning

Punishment

Punishment decreases behavior.

Positive Punishment– behavior followed by aversive consequence– aversive (unpleasant) stimulus is “added”

Negative Punishment– behavior followed by aversive consequence– rewarding stimulus is “removed”

Page 46: Chapter 2 Learning

Controversy Over Punishment

• corporal punishment– used by 70-90% of parents in the

U.S.– correlational research studies

• problems associated with punishment

• why should parents avoid spanking?

• is physical punishment necessary?

Page 47: Chapter 2 Learning

Latent Learning

Page 48: Chapter 2 Learning

Cognition and Operant

Conditioning Cognitive Map

mental representation of the layout of one’s environment

Example: after exploring a maze, rats act as if they have learned a cognitive map of it

Latent Learning learning that occurs, but is not

apparent until there is an incentive to demonstrate it

Page 49: Chapter 2 Learning

Cognition and Operant

Conditioning

Overjustification Effect the effect of promising a reward

for doing what one already likes to do

the person may now see the reward, rather than intrinsic interest, as the motivation for performing the task

Page 50: Chapter 2 Learning

Cognition and Operant

Conditioning

Intrinsic Motivation Desire to perform a behavior for

its own sake and to be effective Extrinsic Motivation

Desire to perform a behavior due to promised rewards or threats of punishments

Page 51: Chapter 2 Learning

Observational Learning

Observational Learning learning by observing others

Modeling process of observing and imitating a

specific behavior Prosocial Behavior

positive, constructive, helpful behavior opposite of antisocial behavior

Page 52: Chapter 2 Learning

Observational Learning

Mirror Neurons frontal lobe neurons that fire

when performing certain actions or when observing another doing so

may enable imitation, language learning, and empathy


Recommended