13
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The objectives of the present study calls for a closer review of the
following topics:
Biomaterials
Surface engineering
AISI 316L Stainless Steel
Ion implantation
Quench Polish Quench process
Corrosion studies
Hardness studies
Wear studies
Design of Experiments
Genetic Algorithms
A literature review was carried out to understand and assess the
current status of the above areas. This chapter is organized in the order
mentioned above.
14
2.2 BIOMATERIALS
William (1964) defines biomaterials as “nonviable materials used
in medical devices, intended to interact with the biological systems”. Sujata
V. Bhat (2002) stated that the Romans, Chinese, and Aztecs used gold in
dentistry over 2000 years ago.
Hench and Ethridge (1982) discussed the usefulness of biomaterials
in replacing a part or a function of a body in a safe, reliable, economic and
physiologically acceptable manner. There are several types of biomaterials
used in orthopedics, density, neurological and etc. Jagielski et al (2006)
discussed the uses of biomaterials in detail. Biomaterials are used for making
devices that can interact with biological systems to coexist for longer service
with minimum failure. Materials used for transplantation have to fulfill very
strict requirements, the most important being those imposed by biological
reasons like blood and tissue compatibility and mainly, the mechanical
properties.
Artificial materials used for implants in medicine and dentistry,
traditionally employ titanium and its alloys, as well as stainless steel because
of its high fracture and corrosion resistance, easy handling and cost
effectiveness. Surface modification of biomaterials is being widely practised
to improve their performance since biomaterials are intended to expose to a
variety of aggressive body liquids. Pramatarova et al (2007) have dealt with
this problem in detail.
Chu et al (2002) discussed the importance of designing biomaterials
with the best surface properties to be used for implants. These properties must
possess along with the desired bulk properties that meet other requirements,
especially mechanical properties in order to function properly in a bio-
15
environment. To enhance the surface properties it would be desirable to arrive
at adequate bulk properties followed by a special surface treatment. In this
way, it allows one to make ideal biomaterials with surface attributes that are
decoupled from the bulk properties. Further, the surface properties can be
selectively modified to enhance the performance of the biomaterials. Jagielski
et al (2006) dealt with the surface treatments of biomaterials. Advanced
biological materials require an appropriate surface treatment ensuring the best
possible interface between implant and human body and optimum functional
properties. Pramatarova et al (2007) indicated that the material surfaces play a
critical role in biology and medicine since most biological reactions occur on
surfaces and interfaces. Xuanyong Liua et al (2004) have dealt with the
surface characterization. The surface characterization of biomaterials is
particularly important when biomaterials are going to be designed. This is not
an easy task considering different surface properties that are most likely to
play an important role in the reaction of the host’s body to the artificial
material.
2.3 SURFACE ENGINEERING
Since most of the reactions occur on surfaces and interfaces,
Pramatarova et al (2007) studied the role of material surfaces in biology and
medicine. There are many examples to demonstrate the fact that the surface
properties of the materials control and are directly involved in biological
reactions and processes. Cui and Luo (1999) insisted on the importance of
surface-engineered biomaterials. The importance of surface-engineered
biomaterials to the longevity of medical implants has been recognized by both
major medical device companies and by more and more patients. In bone
replacement, especially long bone and joint replacements, metal implants are
widely used to take the unsubstituted position. Although the metallic
orthopedic implants might have excellent bulk properties such as ideal
16
strength and elasticity, it has relatively poor surface properties, e.g. poor wear
resistance and limited biocompatibility. It is therefore necessary to make a
compromise between bulk and surface properties. Bharat Bhushan (1999)
showed the commonly used coating deposition techniques and surface
treatments.
2.4 AISI 316L STAINLESS STEEL
Zbeka et al (2002) discussed the selection of the material type for
biomedical applications. Metals are the most favored materials in orthopedic
surgery and particularly in total hip replacement, because of their good
mechanical stability. On the other hand, metals corrode in contact with
aggressive body fluids or tissue. Therefore, the designer must be careful while
selecting materials of this type.
Tomonori Nakanishi et al (2007) have dealt with the metallic
materials for biomedical application. Metal materials are chosen as
osteosynthesis implants for internal fixation in fractures nowadays: in
particular, austenitic stainless steel (e.g. AISI 304, AISI 316L) has been
widely used for many cases because of the following qualities: Excellent
mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, sufficient formability, and cost
effectiveness. However there are many problems related to plate breakage and
irritation with respect to the fixation devices for osteosynthesis treatment.
Gurappa (2002) dealt with the problems in metallic materials. Although the
metallic orthopedic implants might have excellent bulk properties such as
ideal strength and elasticity, it has relatively poor surface properties, e.g. poor
wear resistance. It has been reported that stainless steel corrodes in vivo. Cui
and Luo (1999) explored the problems related to wear. In case of hip
replacement, the wear debris from the implant is one of the important factor
for the aseptic loosening, which is a frequent cause of failure of the prosthetic
17
implants. It is generally accepted that improving the wear resistance and
biocompatibility by surface engineering is an optimal option.
Liu Chenglong et al (2005) found some of the applications of AISI
316L stainless steel to be useful in biomedical implants, such as orthopedic,
cardiovascular and dental devices. Metin Usta et al (2004) did considerable
research on the use of 316L austenitic stainless steel for implant fabrication
because of its greater resistance to corrosion than carbon and low-alloy steel,
primarily due to the presence of chromium. Surface modification methods are
widely used in order to improve corrosion resistance, wear resistance, and
fatigue strength of 316L stainless steel.
The properties of AISI 316L have been dealt with in detail by
Zbeka et al (2002). Austenitic stainless steel, as their name implies, has an
austenitic microstructure at room temperature and cannot be hardened to any
great extent by heat treatment, although it can be appreciably strengthened by
cold work. Gurappa (2002) studied the applications of AISI 316L SS in
reconstructive surgery, heart valve parts, wire leads, aneurysm clips and
dental uses. He further stated that AIS1 316L stainless steel is the most widely
used stainless steel for medical and dental applications. Metin Usta et al
(2004) studied the applicability of 316L SS in situations where corrosion
resistance is required and found out that the inclusion of molybdenum
enhances resistance to pitting corrosion in salt water.
Liu Chenglong et al (2005) have dealt with the corrosion of
implants inside the body and listed the applications of AISI 316L SS. In
recent years, the application of protective coatings for implants has been
attracting considerable attention. TiN film is an interesting choice for
implants due to some of its useful properties, such as chemical stability, high
hardness, excellent wear properties, electrical properties and intrinsic
18
biocompatibility. Zhu and Lei (2005) concluded that the austenitic stainless
steel and its alloys are successfully used in surgical implants, because of their
ease of fabrication and reasonable resistance to corrosion. Pramatarova et al
(2007) studied the use of titanium and stainless steel in medicine and dentistry
because of its high fracture and corrosion resistance, easy handling and
comparatively low cost.
2.5 SURFACE MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
Various surface modification techniques have been applied to
improve the properties of AISI 316L SS. Some of these studies are
summarized below: De Oliveira et al (2003) studied the effect of the
temperature of plasma nitriding on AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel.
Double layers of nickel and aluminum were electroplated on 316L stainless
steel by Kannan et al (2005). Fossati et al (2006) studied the properties of
glow discharge nitrided AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel in NaCl solutions.
Kemin Zhang et al (2006) investigated in detail the surface modification by
HCPEB and the pitting corrosion behaviour of AISI 316L stainless steel in
saline environment. Tomonori Nakanishi et al (2007) described the
mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of fully and partially solution-
nitrided 316L stainless steel plates.
2.6 ION IMPLANTATION PROCESS
Among numerous methods of surface treatment, Jagielski et al
(2006) found that certain unique advantages of ion implantation enable it
specifically well-suited for medical applications. Halit Dogan et al (2002)
have dealt with this technique in detail. Ion implantation is a surface
modification technique that modifies the materials surface characteristics.
Micro structural effect due to the interaction between the ions of the ion beam
19
and the atoms of the target are produced in the surface. These effects may be
responsible for modifications in the wear and corrosion resistance.
Cui and Luo (1999) investigated the biomaterials modification by
ion beam processing. His study deals with the techniques and applications of
surface modifications of ion beam process, in particular, the technologies of
ion implantation and ion-beam assisted deposition. In order to improve the
corrosion and wear resistance for the austenitic stainless steel and its alloys,
different surface modification techniques such as ion implantation was used
by Zhu and Lei (2005). Newly designed polymers using ion beam
modification methods to improve blood and tissue compatibility have been
studied by Yoshiaki Suzuki and Hiroshi Ujiie (2004).
A review of literature reveals studies related to the implantation of
various ions in biomaterials. The extensive study on nitrogen implantation has
been done. Nitrogen was implanted in polymers and various biomaterials for
different applications. Xu et al (1999) performed the ion irradiation of helium,
nitrogen and oxygen on different materials. A study by Halit Dogan et al
(2002) focused on the friction and wear behaviour of N2 and Zr implanted and
TiN coated 316L stainless steel and compared it with a substrate. A study by
Rodriguez et al (2007) aims at evaluating the effect of light ions (nitrogen,
helium) implanted in く-irradiated UHMWPE samples. In their study, Micro
hardness changes are correlated with the implantation dose in order to identify
the optimum treatment conditions.
In his research of surface characterization and wear behaviour of
ion implanted NiTi shape memory alloy, Neonila Levintant-Zayonts and
Stanislaw Kucharski (2009) studied the effects of nitrogen implantation on
NiTi shape memory alloy. Ion implantation of oxygen and nitrogen in CpTi
was researched upon by Munoz-Castro et al (2009) and nitrogen implantation
20
in 316L stainless steel was also studied by Ozturk (2009). Implantation of
helium also seems to have drawn a considerable degree of attention from the
researchers. Helium was implanted in polymers for biomedical applications.
Jagielski et al (2006) conducted an experiment on the ion implantation
process for surface modification of biomaterials. Furthermore, Rodriguez et al
(2007) found that helium implantation led to a considerable increase in the
surface mechanical properties of polymers.
Xu et al (1999) worked on the surface modification of polymers by
ion implantation for biocompatible materials. The ion beam mixing technique
was discussed by Nastasi and Mayer (1994). Johnson et al (2001) described
the oxygen and hydrogen profiles in metal surfaces following plasma
immersion ion implantation of helium. Valenza et al (2004) studied the
characterization of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)
modified by ion implantation. Argon was implanted in ceramics by Jagielski
et al (2006) and polymers by Valenza et al (2004). Nitrogen and oxygen
implantations in stainless steel were studied by Anandan et al (2007). Kripton
was implanted in Ti-6A1-4V alloy by Budzunski et al (2009). Singh et al
(2002) conducted studies using a mixture of ions for implantation with
nitrogen and argon, while Chih-Neng Chang and Fan-shiong Chen (2003)
used nitrogen and carbon, Pramatarova et al (2007) used calcium and
phosphorus for their study.
2.7 SALT BATH NITROCARBURIZING AND POST
OXIDATION-QPQ PROCESS
The QPQ salt bath treatment is a type of advanced technology used
for surface strengthening. Nitrocarburizing has got its wide applications, since
improved surface hardness, fatigue strength and corrosion resistance at
elevated temperatures are achieved at minimal distortion. However since
21
additional processes of oxidizing of nitrocarburized components are also
applied, it significantly improves the corrosion resistance, while the wear
resistance and dimension tolerance are maintained. Franjo Cajer et al (2003)
have dealt with this in detail. Yeung et al (1997) stated that QPQ process is
used widely to increase surface wear resistance, to enhance fatigue strength
and to improve corrosion resistance of the treated components. Li et al (1997)
applied the QPQ surface-treatment process to AISI 1045 steel and studied the
influence of the nitriding temperature and nitriding time on the depth of the
nitriding layer. Hong et al (2000) performed the plasma post-oxidation
process after a plasma nitrocarburizing step in a comparison with a
conventional post-oxidation process and found plasma oxide film showing
improved anti-corrosion properties. Gui-jiang Li et al (2008) studied the
mircrostructure of AISI 316L stainless steel under QPQ process.
Though the QPQ is a combination of nitrocarburizing and oxidizing
process, the process was tried separately as well. Czarnowska et al (2000)
studied the surface layers produced by nitriding and nitrocarburizing to
improve the wear resistance and hardness of titanium alloy for biomedical
applications. The effects of carbon ion implantation into Ti-6Al-4V as a pre-
treatment process prior to deposition of Ta-C coatings were studied by Tong
et al (2001). Chih-Neng Chang and Fan-shiong Chen (2003) conducted the
wear resistance evaluation of plasma nitocarburized AISI 316L stainless steel
and Chun-che Shin et al (2004) studied the effect of surface oxide properties
on corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel for bio-medical applications
and both of them found an improvement in the properties. Metin Usta et al
(2004) studied the effect of nitriding on surface properties of surgical AISI
316L stainless steel and found that the hardness of the treated material
improved significantly. Ani Zhecheva et al (2005) analyzed the effects of
nitriding in the mircrohardness and corrosion resistance of titanium and
titanium alloys.
22
2.8 CORROSION STUDIES
The human body is a harsh environment for metals and alloys to be
in an oxygenated saline solution. When an orthopedic implant is surgically
installed into the human body, it is constantly bathed in extracellular tissue
fluid. All the surgically implanted metallic materials, including the most
corrosion-resistant materials, undergo chemical or electrochemical dissolution
at some finite rate due to the complex and corrosive environment of the
human body. An orthopedic implant is considered to be a failure if it is
prematurely removed from the body due to severe pain and due to the
occurrences of other reactions with the body like corrosion and wear. Thus
the corrosion study of biomaterial becomes very important. Kamachi Mudali
et al (2003) have dealt with this in detail.
In the recent years, several attempts have been made to improve the
corrosion properties of metals alloys used in orthopedic surgery. Youngjoon
Moon and Dokyol Lee (2003) formed a corrosion-protective surface layer of
Ni2Al3 compound on a 316L SS plate and studied the corrosion behaviour of
those plates. They observed that the passive currents are lower than observed
for a base SS plate.
Franjo Cajer et al (2003) observed that the corrosion as well the
hardness was improved by applying the salt bath nitrocarbunizing with post-
oxidation. The corrosion and wear-corrosion behaviour of NiTi modified by
plasma source ion implantation was studied by Tan et al (2003) and he
concluded that better wear-corrosion resistance was observed in the case of
oxygen implanted samples. Chun-che Shin et al (2004) studied the effect of
different passivative process on the in vitro corrosion resistance of 316L
stainless steel wire. To substantiate the further results, the SEM and XPS
results were used. The nitrogen plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII)
23
treatment of austenitic steels 1.4301 and 1.4571 was performed and the
influence of process conditions on the corrosion properties was studied by
Mandl et al (2005). Kannan et al (2005) stated that in case of coatings induced
by surface treatments, a passive layer is present in the ceramic metal interface
contributing to the reduction in the corrosion of coating. Since the bio
materials are used inside the body, Liu Chenglong et al (2005) prepared
Ti/TiN- multilayered film on surgical AISI 316L stainless steel and did the
corrosion study in simulated body fluid. Kemin Zhang et al (2006) found the
pitting corrosion resistance of AISI 316L SS treated by high current pulsed
electron beam was improved, from this study he observed the Ecorr, icorr and
Epit values for analisis. Murugan and Kannan (2007) conducted an
experimental study to analyze the effects of various flux cored arc welding
process parameters on pitting potential in dublex stainless steel. Mathematical
model was developed using the observed Epit values for analysis. To perform
the corrosion tests of biomaterials in simulated nature tissues environment,
Linda Gil et al (2006) suggested electrochemical tests be conducted in an
electrolyte solution of NaCl (9 g/l of H2O) at pH=6.3 and a temperature of
37 °C.
Fossati et al (2006) studied the effect of the nitriding temperature
on the pitting and cervic corrosion resistance of glow-discharged nitrided
AISI 316L SS. Tomonori Nakanishi et al (2007) made an attempt to improve
the mechanical properties and the corrosion resistance of commercial 316L
SS plates by means of solution nitriding. Saravanan et al (2007) examined
how low energy of high current density PIII affects the corrosion, wear and
hardness behaviour of 316L SS. Anandan et al (2007) observed that nitrogen
implementation affects corrosion resistance.
Ion implementation of oxygen and nitrogen in CpTi was done by
Munoz-castro et al (2009) and corrosion studies were conducted. The
24
Ecorr, icorr and Epit observations from the electrochemical study were used to
evaluate the corrosion behaviour of the treated samples. The electrochemical
behaviour of an AISI 304C SS implanted with nitrogen was studied by Abreu
et al (2008). The corrosion resistance of pulsed laser-treated Ti-6A1-4V
implant in simulated body fluids was found to be increased by Nikita Zaveri
et al (2008).
2.9 HARDNESS STUDIES
Guemmaz et al (1998) discussed that AISI 316L is widely used as a
biomaterial, due to its high corrosion resistance in biological environments.
However, in the case of applications in the domain of orthopedic prosthesis, a
major limitation is its weak wear resistance. As a matter of fact, an increase in
hardness is usually correlated with a corresponding improvement in wear
resistance. Schmidt et al (1997) measured the micro hardness of the Ti64l4V.
The hardness values were determined by measuring the depth of the
indentation while increasing loads from 0.4 to 104 N. In their discussion of
QPQ treatment, Yeung et al (1997) stated that when the temperature of the
process exceeds 560 °C, the peak hardness shifts from the outer most layers to
the inner nitride layer. Tong et al (2001) measured the Vickers microhardness
with a range of varying loads from 5 g to 20 g for carbon pre-implanted, ta-C
coated Ti-6A1-4V substrate material. He further observed that the micro
hardness increased at 5 g load and decreased to microhardness equal to that of
the substrate material at 20 g load. The surface hardness of the substrate and
nitride samples were measured using knops indenter and load of 1 N, and it
was found by Singh et al (2002) that the hardness of nitride samples were
increased. De Oliveira et al (2003) did plasma nitriding on AISI 316L SS and
observed that the treated layers presented an accentuated increase in their
hardness in relation to the hardness of the substrate. The microhardness
distribution from the surface of the plasma nitride 316L SS was measured by
25
Chih-Neng Chang and Fan-shiong Chen (2003). Metin usta et al (2004)
observations on hardness measurements indicated that the hardness of the
nitrides is much higher when compared to the base metal. The load dependent
micro hardness of nitrogen ion implanted Ti-6A1-7Nb was displayed by
Gokul Lakshmi et al (2004).
2.10 WEAR STUDIES
Li et al (2004) stated that wear characteristics constitute an
important aspect of the performance of biomaterial alloys. Failure generally
occurs due to excessive wear of the components. Serra et al (2002) stated that
total joint replacements are highly reliable medical devices, but their
long-term performance is limited by several factors which includes wear.
Bills et al (2005) found that the main cause of failure is aseptic loosening due
to the cascade of events started by the tissue reaction to wear debris. The joint
with higher wear rate typically leads to reduced function and premature
failure. Many studies have been done on the wear studies to estimate the wear
and hardness of the materials. De Oliveira et al (2003) observed a major
limitation of applying AISI 316L SS in those cases where high hardness and
wear resistance were required.
In the field of wear study, the pin-on-disc plays an important role,
due to it’s simplicity and ease in simulating the natural wear environment.
Teoh et al (1998) reported the functional properties of a triplastic titanium
graphite composite which is used in biomedical applications. Daisaku Ikeda et
al (2002) performed the friction test using pin-on-disc test machine on
nitrogen-based ion implanted joint prosthetic material and the coefficient of
friction was measured. Md Ohidul Alam and Haseeb (2002) subjected pin-on-
disc type arrangement to dry sliding wear and studied the wear performance.
Aluko et al (2002) described the design and development of an inexpensive
26
rig for carrying out rapid comparative evaluation of the wear performance of
electrode fill materials. The wear tests were carried out on carburized,
carbonitrided and borided AISI 1020 and 5115 steels with pin-on-disc
configuration and weight losses were determined as a function of sliding
distance and applied load by Selcuk et al (2003). Met et al (2003) carried out
rotating pin-on-disc friction tests at room temperature in ambient air using
ringers solution and synthetic serum to analyse the in vivo wear conditions.
The friction coefficients and wear rates of different materials were studied.
Paulo Davim and Nuno Marques (2004) used a pin-on-disc tribometer to
study the effect of sliding distance, sliding velocity and contact stress on the
friction coefficient and wear of cancellous bone.
The wear studies were conducted on various kinds of biomaterials
with various types of test rigs. Chih-Neng Chang and Fan-Shiong Chen
(2003) employed a ring-on-disc wear resistance test to evaluate the
nitrocarburized layers, derived from various treatment conditions and
observed the Vickers microhardness of the treated materials. Poliakov et al
(2004) reported on the experimental data of wear and hardness of hard DLC
thin film on UHMWPE and compared it with other biomaterials such as
Co-Cr-Mo, Ti and stainless steels. Amit Roychowdhury et al (2004)
conducted wear studies of UHMWPE, ceramics, Co-Cr-Mo alloy and
titanium which are frequently used as implant materials. The effect of
nitriding on wear and hardness properties of surgical AISI 316L stainless steel
was investigated by Metin Usta et al (2004). Saduman Sen et al (2006)
investigated the wear behaviour of borided and borided with oxidized for a
short duration AISI 4140 steel. It was observed that the friction coefficient
dropped after short-duration oxidizing.
27
Hardness is quite often used in the field of wear resistance as the
criteria for judging metals. The general conception is that the harder the
material, the greater it’s wear resistance.
2.11 DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
It is essential to design the experiments on a scientific background
basis rather than on the commonly employed trial and error method. Apart
from the trial and error methods of investigations, to analyse the effect of
process parameters on responses, the other methods adopted by researchers
include the theoretical approach, qualitative approach, qualitative cum
dimensional analysis approach, specific qualitative approach and general
quantitative approach. Box and Hunter (1978) have dealt with in length about
this.
DOE is a statistical method which is used to perform the
experiment work in a planned manner and to investigate the interaction
effects between the various process parameters considered. Hamad et al
(2010) stated more specifically that the Response Surface Method (RSM) has
been utilized to perform the parametric studies and to develop a statistical
method.
Kwak (2005) observed that the RSM is a collection of statistical
and mathematical methods which are useful for modeling and analyzing
engineering problems. RSM also quantifies the relationship between the
controllable input parameters and the obtained response surface. The design
procedure for RSM was discussed by Gunaraj and Murugan (1999) in detail.
The experimental design techniques commonly used for process
analysis and modeling are the full factorial, partial factorial and central
composite rotatable designs. Aslam (2008) have discussed this in length. An
28
effective alternative to factorial design is central composite rotatable design
(CCRD), originally developed by Box and Wilson (1951), and improved upon
by Box and Hunter (1961). CCRD gives almost as much information as a
three-level factorial, requires fewer tests when compared to the full factorial
design and has been proved to be efficient in describing the majority of
steady-state process responses. Obeng et al (2005) have discussed this in
detail.
A substantial research work has been done in the field of process
modeling and optimization with the application of DOE and RSM. Ghezal
and Kamal Khayat (2002) optimized the self-consolidating concrete with
limestone filler using the statistical factorial design method. Byungwhan Kim
et al (2006) used a statistical experimental design which includes the six
process parameter to analyze the temperature effect on deposition rate of
silicon nitride films.
Gaitonde et al (2008) developed second order mathematical models
for assessing burr height and burr thickness using RSM. Aslam (2008)
established the fact that the RSM and central composite rotatable design could
efficiently be applied for the modeling of multi-gravity separator for
chromites concentration. Darwin et al (2007) used Taguchi method to
optimize cryogenic treatment to maximize the wear resistance of 18% Cr
martensitic stainless steel. The RSM was employed to optimize the
microencapsulation condition of sun flower oil as typical seed oil by Jang-
Hyuk Ahn et al (2008). Guaracho et al (2009) established the fact that the
central composite design could be applied to the removal of lead and nickel
ions from sand and it was also found be an economical way of obtaining the
maximum amount of information with the fewest experiments. Aliofkhazraei
et al (2009) applied RSM to optimize the operating conditions for small
nanocrystallite sizes of coatings. He used a three factor three level matrix.
29
El-Tayeb et al (2009) reported the usage of DOE and utilization of RSM in
the study of the effect of main and mixed independent variables such as speed
and sliding distance in wear study, on the friction coefficient. The bake
hardening behaviour of AI7075 was investigated using the RSM by Kamran
Dehghani et al (2010). Hamad et al (2010) performed the laser nitriding of
commercial pure titanium using RSM in the DOE statistical approach to
determine the optimum processing parameters.
Gunaraj and Murugan (2002) developed regression equations using
the method of least squares. F–ratio and R–ratio were used to test the
adequacy of these equations. Using student t–test, the significance of each
coefficient of different parameters were tested and final models were
developed using only those significant coefficients without sacrificing
accuracy of the models. In general, this approach helps in minimizing the cost
and time of testing while at the same time increasing the probability of
success. The use of commercially available software for carrying out all the
above analysis has also been reported. Gunaraj and Murugan (1999) found the
central composite rotatable type is favored for the exploration of quadratic
response surfaces. Response surface methodology is a technique which is
used to determine and represent the cause and effect relationship between true
mean responses and input control variables as a two or three-dimensional
hyper surface.
2.12 GENETIC ALGORITHM
Most of the traditional optimization methods such as sequential
quadratic programming are not applicable for solving a large scale, highly non
linear, non convex, discrete optimization problems. This is because they are
typically highly dependent on the initial design point and tend to be tightly
coupled to the solution domain. They are essentially local search techniques,
30
as opposed to the global search methods. Fu et al (2004) dealt with this in
detail. Probabilistic algorithms, such as genetic algorithms (GAs) are suitable
for such problems. This algorithm offers significant savings, when compared
to exhaustive searches in computational costs, by selectively searching a
much smaller fraction of the solutions space for problem involving a large
number of discrete variables.
Genetic Algorithms form a class of adaptive heuristics based on
principles derived from the dynamics of natural population genetics was
discussed by Goldberg (1989). The GA combines the Darwinian principle of
natural selection “survival of the fittest” strategy to eliminate unfit solutions,
resulting in a search mechanism with surprising power and speed. Man et al
(1999) has dealt with this in detail. GA is found it’s application in many
fields. Hajela (1989) applied GA in truss design. While Dunn (1997) applied
GA in structure design, Price (1997) applied it in market simulation.
To optimize the combustion process, the genetic algorithm was
used by Ryoji Homma and Chen (2000). Suresh Kumar Reddy and
Venkateswara Rao (2006) used Genetic Algorithm to select the optimal
parametric combination for achieving a better surface finish in dry milling.
The combination of DOE and GA was used in many applications. The DOE
was used to develop the mathematical model and GA was used to optimize
the model. Ozcelik and Erurumlu (2005) attempted to determine the effecting
dimensional parameters on warpage of the thin shell plastic parts using
integrated response surface methodology and GA. To predict the temperature
effect on deposition rate of silicon nitride films, Byungwhan Kim et al (2006)
used the statistical experimental design and Genetic Algorithm.
Gaitonde et al (2008) developed the second order mathematical
model for burr height and burr thickness using RSM. The developed models
were employed with GA, to determine the optimal process parameters.
31
Combined optimization algorithm was also used by Shen Changyu et al
(2007). The combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm
method was used to optimize injection molding process parameters. GA is
known to provide an optimization platform method capable of treating highly
non-linear and complex behaviour problems, thereby making it an appealing
option. Jing Ying Zhang (2007) developed a new constraint handling strategy
combined with population initialization. Xiu-Juan Zhang et al (2008)
developed a detailed approach using an improved Genetic algorithm for
selecting optimal material constituent compositions according to the
optimized material properties. A C-code was developed and used to simulate
the GA by Kalyanmoy Deb et al (2009) for optimization process.
2.13 CONCLUDING REMARKS
Although research has recorded several studies conducted ion
implantation experiments on AISI 316L stainless steel, it does seem to
indicate a gap-the combination of implantation parameters and specific test
parameters like microhardness, electrochemical corrosion tests, SEM and
XRD analysis. The present study attempts to fill this gap. The following ions
were selected for implantation based on the literature survey.
Helium
Nitrogen
Oxygen
Argon
For Implantation the following parameters were considered:
Ion beam energy: 100 keV
The dose: 11017
ions/cm2
Beam current density: 1たA/cm2
32
From the survey, it can be observed further that not much of
investigations have been covered out in the following areas also:
The application of DOE in the QPQ process and development of
mathematical models involving QPQ process variables has not been much
researched. While there is considerable amount of literature available on the
application of GA in optimization of engineering problem, the investigation
on the application of GA in QPQ process parameters with the aim of required
responses is still found to be inadequate. The summary of the literature review
about the experimental designs is given below:
Use of the statistical experimental techniques based on central
composite rotatable design is well suited for QPQ process and
investigations.
The second order quadratic mathematical models can be used
in predicting the mechanical behaviour of QPQ processed
AISI 316L SS.
Response surface methodology can be employed in empirical
study of relationships between one or more measured
responses and a number of independently controllable process
variables.
It was decided to conduct experiments to predict the effects of
process parameters on responses.
Five factors, five levels central composite rotatable
experimental design was used for the present study.
33
The five factors selected for investigation were:
Bath Chemistry (C)
Process Temperature (T)
Process Time (t1)
Oxidizing Time (t2)
Post oxidizing Time (t3)
The responses were:
Pitting corrosion resistance-Epit (mV)
Hardness (HV0.1)
Wear volume loss (cm3)
Coefficient of friction-µ