1
Chapter 3
Mean-Variance Analysis, CAPM, APT
2
)~
(0
)~
()~
(
],)[()~
.(.:var
)~
(
)]~
([)~
(:
)~
(:
2
2
1
XEXif
XEXifXEXX
whereXEXVSianceSemi
XVar
XEXEXVarVariance
XpXEMean
i
iii
i
X
i
n
iii
3
A.Two Asset Portfolio
11)
~,
~(
)~
(
)~
,~
()1(2)~
()1()~
()~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(22
XYYX
XY
PP
P
P
YXCov
RVar
YXCovaaYVaraXVaraRVar
YEaXaERE
4
A.Two Asset Portfolio1.
YX
YP
YYXYXP
YX
YXYX
XYYXYXP
P
a
aaaR
aa
aaaa
aaaaRVar
YEaXaERE
)()1()~
(
])1([
)1(2)1(
)1(2)1()~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(
2
2222
2222
1XY
5
A.Two Asset Portfolio
PYXYX
YX
YX
PX
YX
YP
P
YEXEXEYE
YEXE
YEaXaERE
)~
()~
()~
()~
(
)~
()~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(
6
A.Two Asset Portfolio2. 1XY
YX
YP
YXP
YX
YXYX
XYYXYXP
P
aRLet
aaR
aa
aaaa
aaaaRVar
YEaXaERE
0)~
(
)1()~
(
])1([
)1(2)1(
)1(2)1()~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(
2
2222
2222
7
A.Two Asset Portfolio
YX
YXYP
YX
YYXP
aifaaR
aifaaR
)1()~
(
)1()~
(
8
A.Two Asset Portfolio
3. 11 XY
XYYXYX
XYYXY
XYYXXYYXYXP
XYYXYXP
P
a
aaada
RdVar
aaaaRVar
YEaXaERE
2
0
42)1(22)
~(
)1(2)1()~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(
22
2
22
2222
9
B.Many Assets Portfolio (Rf. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection,199
2)
)~
()~
(
)~
(
)()~
(
1 1
1
PP
ji
n
ij
n
jiP
i
n
iiP
RVarR
wwRVar
REwRE
10
B.Many Assets Portfolio
)1()(
1
..
12
11
1 1
1
1
1 1
2
n
ii
n
iCiiji
n
ij
n
ji
n
ii
n
iCii
ji
n
ij
n
jiP
QLQLQQ
Q
QTS
QQMin
L
11
B.Many Assets Portfolio1. Minimum Variance Opportunity Set
The locus of risk and return combination offered by portfolio of risky assets that yields the minimum variance for a given rate of return
2. Efficient Set (Efficient Frontier)
The set of mean-variance choices from the investment opportunity set where for a given variance no other investment opportunity offers a higher return.
12
C.Capital Market Line(CML)
1. Optimal Portfolio Choice(The efficient set) for a risk averse investor
» B:Equilibrium Point?» E:Equilibrium Point?Efficient Portfolio?» D:Equilibrium Point?» C:Equilibrium Point? EE MRTMRS
risklessTakeMRTMRS EE
13
C.Capital Market Line(CML)
2. Optimal Portfolio Choice for a different risk averse investors
iiiE
iiiE
iiE
iiE
iE
iE
iiiE
iiiE
iiE
iiE
iE
iE
iiiE
iiiE
iiE
iiE
iE
iE
MRTMRSiiifor
MRTMRSiifor
MRTMRSiforD
MRTMRSiiifor
MRTMRSiifor
MRTMRSiforC
MRTMRSiiifor
MRTMRSiifor
MRTMRSportfoliopotimaliforB
,
,
,:
,
,
,:
,
,
,:
14
C.Capital Market Line(CML)
» A:Utility Maximization?
» B:Utility Maximization? No Capital Market?
With Capital Market?
» C: Utility Maximization?
risklessTakeMRTMRS EE
EE MRTMRS
Em
fmiiiE
iiE
iE
m
fmE
MRTRRE
MRSMRSMRS
RREMRS
)(
)(
15
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)Treynor[1961], Sharpe[1963], Lintner[1965], Mosson[1966]
1. Assumptions1) Risk-averse investors, expected utility maximization
2) Price-taker investor, Homogenous expectation, Joint-Normal distribution
3) Risk-free rate
4) Marketable and Perfectly divisible assets.
5) Frictionless market and No information costs
6) No market imperfections.
16
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
2. Derivation of CAPM
m
mimimmm
a
P
mi
a
P
imimmmi
immiP
miP
immiP
miP
a
R
REREa
RE
aaa
aaaaa
R
REREa
RE
aaaaR
REaRaERE
222
12
0
0
222
2
12222
2
12222
)22()(2
1)~
(
)~
()~
()
~(
]42222[
])1(2)1([2
1)~
(
)~
()~
()
~(
])1(2)1([)~
(
)~
()1()~
()~
(
17
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)In equilibrium,
)~
(
)~
,~
cov(
])~
([)~
(
])~
([)~
(
)~
()~
()~
(
)~
(
)~
(
2
2
2
0
m
mi
m
imi
ifmfi
m
imfmfi
m
fm
m
mim
mi
a
P
P
RVar
RRWhere
SMLRRERREor
RRERRE
RRERERE
aR
aRE
18
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
19
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)– Two-fund Separation Theorem
• Each investor will have a utility-maximization portfolio that is a combination of the risk free asset and a portfolio of risky assets that is determined by the line drawn from the risk free rate of return tangent to the investor’s efficient set of risky assets
20
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
– Capital Market Line and Mutual Fund Theorem
• If investors have homogenous beliefs, then they all hold the same mutual fund and
• They all have the same linear efficient set called the CML
n
ii
ii
v
vw
1
))
~()
~(
()
~(
)~
(P
fP
m
fmP
m
fmfP
RRERRERRERRE
21
D.Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
» Basu [1977]:P/E
» Litzenberger & Ramaswamy[1979]:Dividend
» Banz[1981]: Size Effect
» Keim[1983]:January Effect
?.2
0.1:Re
:
0
10'
factoronlytheis
sults
RModel
j
jtjjt
22
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)1. Assumptions : Ross[1976]
1) Risk-averse Investors
2) Homogeneous expectation of k-factor return generating process
3) Perfect Market
4) Number of assets,N > Number of factors,k
5) Idiosyncratic risk, is independent of all factors and
ikikiii FbFbRER ~~~)
~(
~11 i
~
i~
j~
0)~
,~(
0)~
,~
(0)~
,~(0)~,~(
ii
jijiji
FE
FFEFEE
23
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)2. Model
1) Arbitrage portfolio in Equilibrium No Wealth change
No additional return
No additional risk
A. No change in wealth
B. No additional return
n
iiw
1
0
0
~~~)
~(
~~
1 111
1
1
n
i
n
iiiiiki
n
iiii
n
iii
n
iiip
wFbwFbwREw
RwR
24
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)C. No additional risk (No systematic risk, No unsystematic risk) condition
a. Unsystematic Risk
(Average residual variance)
( Law of large number)∵
n
iii
i
bw
nn
w
1
1
01
lim
1
1)
1(
2
1
2
1
22
1
222
in
i
n
i
in
ii
n
iiip
n
n
nnnw
25
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)b. Systematic Rick
n
iii
n
iiiki
n
iiii
n
iii
n
i
n
iiiiiki
n
iiii
n
iiip
REw
FbwFbwREw
wFbwFbwREwR
1
111
1
1 111
1
)~
(
~~)
~(
~~~)
~(
~
26
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)2) Derivation of APT
)~
(
)~
,~
cov(,
][][)~
(
)~
(
)~
(
0)~
(
0
0)(0
11
11
11
110
1
1
11
k
kiik
ikfkiffi
ikkifi
ikkif
ikkii
i
n
ii
n
iiki
n
ii
n
ii
Var
Rbwhere
bRbRRRE
bbRRE
bbR
bbRE
REw
bw
eww
27
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)
28
E.Arbitrage Pricing Theory(APT)
3) Advantages of APTA. No assumption of normal distribution
B. No efficient market portfolio
C. Asset pricing is dependent on many factors
4) Empirical of APT: Chen, Roll and Ross (1983)A. Industrial Production
B. Changes in default risk premium
C. Twists in the yield curve
D. Unexpected inflation