+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter 3 Individual Demand Curves © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.

Chapter 3 Individual Demand Curves © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 226 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
70
Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Individual Demand Curves © 2006 Thomson Learning/South- Western
Transcript

Chapter 3Chapter 3

Individual Demand

Curves

© 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western

2

Demand Functions

Knowing person’s preferences and all economic forces that affect choices allows prediction of how much of each good person would choose in face of scarcity

Summarizes this information in demand function: representation of how quantity demanded depends on prices, income, and preferences.

3

Demand Function

Three elements determine quantity demanded: Prices of X and Y Income (I) Person’s preferences for X and Y.

Preferences appear to right of semicolon-- assume that preferences do not change during analysis (static)

);,,(demanded X ofQuantity spreferenceIPPd YXx {3.1}

4

Changes in Income

When income increases and prices remain same, quantity of each good purchased might increase.

Shown in Figure 3-1 where increase in income shows as shift of budget line outward from I1 to I2 to I3.

Slope of budget lines remain same because prices have not changed .

5

Quantity of Yper week

U1

I1Quantity of X

per weekX10

FIGURE 3-1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen

Y1

6

Quantity of Yper week

U1

I1Quantity of X

per weekX10

FIGURE 3-1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen

X2

Y2

Y1U2

I2

7

Quantity of Yper week

Y3

U1

I1 Quantity of Xper weekX10

FIGURE 3-1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen

X2 X3

Y2

Y1U2

U3

I2 I3

8

Changes in Income

Response to increased income: quantity of X purchased increases from X1 to X2 and X3 while the quantity purchased of Y also increases from Y1 to Y2 to Y3.

Income increases allow more consumption, reflected in outward shift in budget constraint. Allows increase in overall utility.

9

Normal Goods & Inferior Goods

Normal good: bought in greater quantities as income increases

Inferior good: bought in smaller quantities as income increases.

10

Quantity of Yper week

Quantity of Zper week0

FIGURE 3-2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority

Z1

Y1 U1

I1

11

Quantity of Yper week

Quantity of Zper week0

FIGURE 3-2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority

Z2 Z1

Y1

Y2

U1

U2

I1I2

12

Quantity of Yper week

Y3

Quantity of Zper weekZ30

FIGURE 3-2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority

Z2 Z1

Y1

Y2

U1

U2

U3

I1 I2 I3

13

Changes in Good’s Price

Change in price of one good causes both slope and intercept of budget line to change.

Change in one good’s price creates new utility-maximizing choice on another indifference curve with a different MRS.

Change in quantity demanded of good with price change

14

Substitution Effect Part of change in quantity demanded for other

goods caused by substitution of one good for another: called substitution effect

Movement along an indifference curve

Consumption has to change to equate MRS to new price ratio of two goods.

15

Income Effect

Price change creates difference in real purchasing power; consumers move to new indifference curve consistent with new purchasing power

Part of change in quantity demanded caused by change in real income: called income effect.

16

Substitution and Income Effects from a Fall in Price

Figure 3-3: when price of good X falls, budget line rotates out from unchanged Y axis such that X intercept lies farther out-- consumer can now buy more X with lower price.

Flatter slope means that relative price of X to Y (PX/PY) has fallen.

17

Quantity of Yper week

Y*

Quantity of Xper weekX*0

FIGURE 3-3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price

U1

18

Quantity of Yper week

Y*

Old budget constraint

B

Substitutioneffect

New budget constraint

Quantity of Xper weekX* XB0

FIGURE 3-3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price

U1

19

Quantity of Yper week

Y**Y*

Old budget constraint

B

Substitutioneffect

Incomeeffect

Total increase in X

New budget constraint

Quantity of Xper week

X* XBX**0

FIGURE 3-3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price

U1

U2

20

Figure 3-4: Relative Size of Substitution Effects

Right Shoes Exxon

(a) Small Substitution Effect’

Mobil

(b) Large Substitution Effect

Left Shoes

.I’

I

U1

A,B

U1

II’

21

Substitution and Income Effects from an Increase in Price Increase in PX will shift budget line in toward

origin, as in Figure 3-5.

Substitution effect, holding “real” income constant: move on U2 from X*, Y* to point B

Because higher price decreases purchasing power, movement from B to X**, Y** is income effect

22

Quantity of Yper week

Y*New budget constraint

Old budget constraint

Quantity of Xper weekX*0

FIGURE 3-5: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price

U2

23

Quantity of Yper week

Y*New budget constraint

Substitutioneffect

Old budget constraint

B

Quantity of Xper weekXB X*0

FIGURE 3-5: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price

U1

U2

24

Quantity of Yper week

Y**

Y*New budget constraint

Incomeeffect

Substitutioneffect

Total reductionin X

Old budget constraint

B

Quantity of Xper weekX**XB X*0

FIGURE 3-5: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price

U1

U2

25

Substitution and Income Effects for a Normal Good: Summary Figures 3-3 and 3-5 show that substitution

and income effects work in the same direction with a normal good.

When price falls, both substitution and income effects result in more purchased.

When price increases, both substitution and income effects result in less purchased.

26

Substitution and Income Effects for a Normal Good: Summary These effects provide rationale for

downward sloping demand curves.

Also help to determine steepness of demand curve

If either substitution or income effects are large, change in quantity demanded will be large with given price change.

27

Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods

With inferior good, substitution and income effects work in opposite directions.

Substitution effect results in decreased consumption for price increase and increased consumption for price decrease.

28

Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods

For inferior goods, income effect results in increased consumption for price increase and decreased consumption for price decrease.

Figure 3-6 shows income and substitution effects for increase in PX.

Substitution effect, holding real income constant, appears as move from X*, Y* to point B both on U2.

29

Quantity of Yper week

Y*

Old budget constraintU2

Quantity of Xper weekX*

0

FIGURE 3-6: Income and Substitution Effects for Inferior Good

30

Quantity of Yper week

Y**

Y*New budget constraint

Old budget constraintU2

B

Quantity of Xper weekX*

0

FIGURE 3-6: Income and Substitution Effects for Inferior Good

U1

31

Quantity of Yper week

Y**

Y*New budget constraint

Old budget constraintU2

B

Quantity of Xper weekX** X*

0

FIGURE 3-6: Income and Substitution Effects for Inferior Good

U1

32

Substitution and Income Effects: Inferior Goods

Income effect reflects reduced purchasing power due to price increase.

X is inferior good: decreased income results in increased consumption of X-- shown by move from point B on U1 to new utility maximizing point X**, Y** on U1.

33

Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods

Since X** is less than X* ,X price increase results in decreased consumption of X.

Decreased consumption happens because the substitution effect, in this example, is bigger than income effect.

Thus, if the substitution effect dominates, the demand curve is negatively sloped.

34

Giffen’s Paradox

If income effect of price change for an inferior good is strong enough, quantity demanded may change in same direction as price change.

Situation in which increase in good’s price leads people to consume more of the good is called Giffen’s paradox.

35

The Lump Sum Principle “Lump-sum principle” holds that taxes

imposed on general purchasing power will have smaller welfare costs than will taxes imposed on narrow selection of commodities.

Consider Figure 3-7: individual initially has I dollars to spend and chooses to consume X* and Y* , yielding U3 utility.

36

Quantity of Y

Y*

I

Quantity of Xper weekX*

FIGURE 3-7: The Lump-Sum Principle

U3

37

The Lump Sum Principle Tax on only good X raises its price,

resulting in budget constraint I* and consumption reduced to X1, Y1 and utility level U1.

General income tax that generates same total tax revenue is represented by budget constraint I** that goes though X1, Y1.

38

Quantity of Y

Y*

I

Quantity of Xper weekX1 X*

FIGURE 3-7: The Lump-Sum Principle

Y1

Y2I’

U1

U3

39

Quantity of Y

Y*

I

Quantity of Xper weekX1 X2 X*

FIGURE 3-7: The Lump-Sum Principle

Y1

Y2I’ I”

U1

U2

U3

40

The Lump Sum Principle Intuitive explanation of lump-sum principle:

single-commodity tax affects consumers in two ways:

Reduces purchasing power, Directs consumption away from good being taxed.

The lump-sum tax only has first of these two effects.

41

Changes in the Price of Another Good

In two-good economy, when price of one good changes, affects demand for other good.

Figure 3-3: increase in price of X (a normal good) caused both income and substitution effect that caused reduction in quantity demanded of X.

42

Changes in the Price of Another Good

In addition, substitution effect caused demand decrease for good Y as consumer substituted good X for good Y.

To offset, purchasing power increase brought about by price decrease causes an increase in demand for good Y (also normal good).

43

Changes in the Price of Another Good

In this case, income effect had dominant effect on good Y--consumption of Y increased due to decrease in X’s price.

With flatter indifference curves as shown in Figure 3-8, situation reverses.

Decrease in X’s price causes decrease in consumption of good Y, as before.

44

Quantity of Yper week

Y*

U1

Quantity of Xper week

Old budget constraint

X*0

FIGURE 3-8: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X

45

Quantity of Yper week

Y*

U2

U1

Quantity of Xper week

New budget constraint

Old budget constraint

X*

B

0

FIGURE 3-8: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X

A

46

Quantity of Yper week

Y**

Y*

U2

U1

Quantity of Xper week

New budget constraint

Old budget constraint

X* X**

B

0

FIGURE 3-8: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X

A

C

47

Changes in the Price of Another Good – Substitutes & Complements

Here, income effect much smaller than substitution effect, so consumer ends up consuming less of good Y at Y** after decrease in X’s price.

Thus, effect of change in the price of one good has an ambiguous effect on demand for the other good.

48

Construction of Individual Demand Curves Individual demand curve: graphic

representation between price of good and quantity demanded by consumer, holding all other factors (preferences, prices of other goods, and income) constant

Demand curves limit the study to the relationship between the quantity demanded and changes in the good’s price—a single-good world

49

Construction of Individual Demand Curves Panel a of Figure 3-9: individual’s

indifference curve map drawn using three different budget constraints--Px decreases

Decreasing prices: P’X, P”X, and P’’’X respectively

Individual’s utility maximizing choices of quantity of X: X’, X’, and X’’’ respectively

50

Quantity of Yper week

U1

X

Quantity of Xper week

Budget constraint for P9

X’

(a) Individual’s indifference curve map

0

Price

P’X

Quantity of Xper week

X’

(b) Demand curve

0

FIGURE 3-9: Construction of Individual’s Demand Curve

51

Quantity of Yper week

U1

U2

Quantity of Xper week

Budget constraint for P’X

Budget constraint for P’’X

X’ X” X’”

(a) Individual’s indifference curve map

0

Price

Quantity of Xper week

X’ X”

(b) Demand curve

0

FIGURE 3-9: Individual’s Demand Curve

P’X

P’’X

52

Quantity of Yper week

U1

U2

U3

X

Quantity of Xper week

X’ X” X’”

(a) Individual’s indifference curve map

0

Price

P9

XP0

XP-

Quantity of Xper week

X’ X” X’”

(b) Demand curve

0

FIGURE 3-9: Individual’s Demand Curve

Budget constraint for P’X

Budget constraint for P’’X

Budget constraint for P’’’X

53

Quantity of Yper week

U1

U2

U3

X

Quantity of Xper week

X’ X” X’”

(a) Individual’s indifference curve map

0

Price

P9

XP0

XP-

dX

Quantity of Xper week

X’ X” X’”

(b) Demand curve

0

FIGURE 3-9: Construction of an Individual’s Demand Curve

Budget constraint for P’X

Budget constraint for P’’X

Budget constraint for P’’’X

54

Constructing Individual Demand Curves

Three choices show that quantity of X demanded increases as PX falls.

Panel b shows how we can use three price and quantity choices to construct demand curve.

55

Constructing Individual Demand Curves

PX appears on vertical axis; QdX shown on horizontal axis.

Demand curve (dX) downward sloping: when PX falls, QdX increases.

This result follows from substitution and income effects (as shown in ch. 2).

56

Shape of the Demand Curve

If good X has close substitutes, increase in its price will cause large decrease in quantity demanded: substitution effect will be large.

Demand curve for a type of breakfast cereal will likely be relatively flat due to strong substitution effect.

57

Shape of the Demand Curve

If good X has few substitutes, substitution effect of price increase or decrease will be small and demand curve will be relatively steep.

Water--good with few substitutes.

58

Shape of the Demand Curve

Food as a category has no substitutes; might be thought that no change in consumption would occur with a price increase.

Food constitutes large part of individual’s budget: price changes may cause relatively larger effects on quantity demanded due to income effect.

59

Shifts in an Individual’s Demand Curve When one variable that had been held constant

(price of another good, income or preferences) changes, the entire demand curve shifts.

Figure 3-10 shows kinds of shifts that might take place.

If X is normal good and income increases, demand increases as shown in Panel a.

60

(a)

P1

X0

(b)

X0

(c)

X0

FIGURE 3-10: Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve

PXPXPX

P1P1

X1 X1 X1X2 X2 X2

61

(a)

P1

X0

(b)

X0

(c)

X0

FIGURE 3-10: Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve

PXPXPX

P1P1

X1 X1 X1X2 X2 X2

62

Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve

If X and Y are substitutes and PY increases, dX increases: shown in Panel b.

Alternatively, if X and Y are complements, PY increase will cause dX decrease: shown in Panel c.

63

Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve

Preference changes can also shift demand curves.

Panel b could represent increased preference for cold drinks when sudden hot spell occurs.

Increased environmental consciousness during the 1980’s and 1990s increased demand for recycling and for organic food.

64

Be Careful in Using Terminology: Essential Distinctions

A movement downward along a stationary demand curve in response to a fall in price is called an increase in quantity demanded while a rise in the price of the good results in a decrease in quantity demanded.

A rightward shift in a demand curve is called an increase in demand while a leftward shift is a decrease in demand.

65

Consumer Surplus Fig. 3-11 shows demand curve for T-shirts. At PT of $11, individual chooses to buy ten

T-shirts. In other words, the individual is willing and

able to pay $11 for the tenth T-shirt. With PT of $9, individual buys fifteen T-

shirts; implicit value of fifteenth shirt only $9.

66

Consumer Surplus Because good usually sold at single market price,

people choose to buy additional units of the good up to the point at which their marginal valuation equals the good’s price (from chapter 2).

Figure 3-11, PT= $7: individual will buy twenty shirts because twentieth T-shirt is worth precisely $7.

Person will not buy the twenty-first T-shirt, because its worth is less than $7.

67

Graphical Illustration of Consumer Surplus

Graphically, consumer surplus given by area below demand curve and above market price.

Figure 3-11: total consumer surplus is given by area AEB ($80).

68

Price (PT= $/shirt)

15

d

Quantity (shirts)

E

FIGURE 3-11: Consumer Surplus from T-Shirt Demand Price ($/shirt)

11

9

A

B

1510 20

69

Consumer Surplus and Utility

Figure 3-12: individual willing to pay BC for right to consume T-shirts rather than spending I only on other goods.

Would need to be compensated by AB in other goods to maintain utility at U1

70

Price ($/shirt)

I’Quantity

(shirts)

E

FIGURE 3-12: Consumer Surplus and Utility

C

A

B

20

I

U1

U0


Recommended