+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Date post: 26-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: hera
View: 56 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications. Part II. Adjudication Procedure. Federal Agency Adjudications versus Article III Trials. Inquisitorial rather than adversarial What does this mean? How does this change the nature of trials? Why is the norm internationally? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
28
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications Part II
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Chapter 3Introduction to Adjudications

Part II

Page 2: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Adjudication Procedure

Page 3: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

3

Federal Agency Adjudications versus Article III Trials

Inquisitorial rather than adversarial What does this mean? How does this change the nature of trials? Why is the norm internationally?

Expertise versus impartiality/cluelessness Do we choose federal judges based on expertise in the

matter before them? How does an expert judge and an inquisitorial system

change the nature of trials?

Page 4: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

4

ALJs versus Article III Judges Article III Judges Protections

Lifetime tenure Cannot reduce salary Cannot fire, only impeach Cannot discipline

Why do we have these protections? How are state judges different?

ALJs Civil service protections

Can be fired Can have salary lowered, but hard to do this Can set work standards and discipline

How are the pressures different than those on an Article III judge? What about contract ALJs that some states use?

Page 5: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

5

The Core Importance of Expertise in Understanding Agencies

A primary reason for congress delegating rulemaking powers to agencies is that the agency has experts in the subject matter

As we will see later in the section on judicial review, the courts generally defer to agencies. This is based in part on agency expertise.

Agency adjudications have very different procedures and due process requirements from Article III trials because the decision is being made based on the judge's expertise, not just the presentation of materials by the parties.

We will see how state efforts to make ALJs impartial undermine this core value.

Page 6: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

6

Notice

What is notice? Why is it required? What has to be provided in the notice? What can complicate notice?

What about in immigration? Welfare benefits?

Page 7: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

7

Burden of Proof

Who has the burden of proof in an administrative proceeding? What is the Social Security Disability example? What is the order in this example? Sometimes the movant is not clear - SSI recertification

This follows the judicial notion of burden of persuasion, which can be different from the burden of going forward or the burden of production.

Page 8: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Shifting the Burden

Old welfare system - Goldberg Beneficiary gets benefit until agency moves to

disqualify New system - TANF

Benefits have limited term No action necessary to terminate benefits.

Recertification schedules Shift the burden to recipient to show qualifications. License renewals can do the same.

8

Page 9: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Standard of Proof

What is the standard of proof required in an agency proceeding, unless otherwise specified in the law?

Are there other standards in administrative proceedings? The United States Supreme Court has upheld a clear

and convincing standard in mental health commitments. Congress is free to require even higher standards of

proof. When we learn about judicial deference to agencies, we

will rethink what preponderance of the evidence really means.

9

Page 10: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Rules of Evidence in Administrative Proceedings (Formal and Informal)

What is the purpose of the rules of evidence in Article III trials? What is the underlying theory of the rules? How does this change when there is no jury?

Why would this be different in an inquisitorial proceeding?

Does the APA set the standard of evidence? Do all agencies use the same standards?

10

Page 11: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

11

Hearsay What is hearsay?

Why is it excluded in the rules of evidence, except for the zillion exceptions?

Why would the hearsay rule not be as important in an agency proceeding?

The Residuum Rule Once prevented adjudications from being based solely on

hearsay evidence This has been replaced by the "substantial evidence" standard

used for all agency evidence LA uses "sufficient evidence" - may not be the exactly same

standard.

Page 12: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

12

Discovery

Not provided for by the APA Some agencies allow discovery Why is it less of an issue than in Art. III trials? Freedom of information/Open Records Acts

Parties may also be entitled to have the agency use its subpoena power on their behalf, if the agency can order discovery for itself.

Page 13: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Federal ALJs

What do most (75%) of federal ALJs do? Why the growth in this area? What do you think is happening during this

prolonged recession? This is the major due process problem/issue in

government benefits adjudications. ALJs are such a “PIA/protective of individual rights”

that they become another reason agencies try to use informal adjudications as much as possible.

13

Page 14: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

14

What is the Legal Status of an ALJ's Opinion?

What is an initial decision, in contrast to a recommended decision? 557(b)

Why did the EPA switch to allowing ALJ decisions to be final decisions if the agency did not act and there were no internal appeals in 45 days?

We will discuss agency rejection of ALJ opinions in the chapter on judicial review.

Page 15: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Stopped here

15

Page 16: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

16

Ex Parte CommunicationsArt III Trials v. Adjudications

Why are these forbidden in Article III trials? Why are they less of a problem in agency

proceedings? How is the relationship between a litigant and

the court different between a litigant and an agency?

Why is knowledge by the judge of the issues and parties treated differently from a trial?

Page 17: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

17

Ex parte Communications in Formal Adjudications

No ex parte communications - 557(d) What is the extreme sanction for a party who

violated this ban? What is the loophole for agency personnel?

ex parte communication prohibition only applies to communications with interested persons outside the agency

Are agency personnel like adverse parties in a trial?

Page 18: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

18

Separation of Functions

What is separation of functions? How does this mitigate the loophole of

communication with agency personnel? Why do we care?

Separation of function has very different results in a large federal agency than in small state agencies Federal - still in the agency and focused in one area States - often outside the agency (central panel),

losing all expertise

Page 19: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

5 U.S.C. §554(d)

http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/Courses/study_aids/adlaw/554.htm

What proceedings are exempt from section (d)?

19

Page 20: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

20

EPA Example

Can the EPA ALJ consult with an EPA scientist to better understand a case? What if it is about advice on facts in issue?

Can the EPA ALJ consult with an agency lawyer about law? What about the lawyer prosecuting the case?

Can the ALJ consult with a party in the case, outside of the proceeding, to get additional facts? How can these consultations be accomplished - what

would you do in an Article III trial?

Page 21: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

21

Consumer Product Safety Commission Example

Can the commissioner consult with his staff? Are they considered legally the same person?

What about the head of the prosecution staff? What is the key question?

What about consulting with the heads of companies not currently before the agency? Can ex parte contacts occur before a proceeding?

Why should the agency be cautious about ex parte contacts? Why do they invite remand from the courts?

Page 22: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

22

Licensing and Permitting as Non-Trial Adjudications

A license is defined as an agency permit, certificate, approval, registration, charter, membership, statutory exception, or other form of permission. ... In short, licensing is the process by which someone obtains, is denied, or has revoked any form of federal agency permission.

Page 23: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Administrative Cost Issues

What are the enforcement advantages of requiring a license as compared to having the agency look for violations in an ongoing activity? Health food supplements v. drugs?

Dangerous dogs Law allows the agency to put special restrictions on

dangerous dogs, but whether a dog is dangerous is decided case by case.

Law provides for special restrictions on pit bulls How is the cost of enforcement different?

23

Page 24: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

24

Licensing under the APA

How are the legal standards for initial licensing different from a license review or revocation? Why? - (Who is the movant?)

How are the potential parties different for a law license than for a TV station license? Competitive licensing How does this change the adjudication?

Page 25: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

25

Disciplining License Holders - Section 558

Section 558 applies to licensing Notice and a hearing before revocation Exception for imminent threats to public health and

safety

Page 26: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

26

LA Law Note - Title 49, Chapter 13, §961. Licenses

C. No revocation, suspension, annulment, or withdrawal of any license is lawful unless, prior to the institution of agency proceedings, the agency gives notice by mail to the licensee of facts or conduct which warrant the intended action, and the licensee is given an opportunity to show compliance with all lawful requirements for the retention of the license. If the agency finds that public health, safety, or welfare imperatively requires emergency action, and incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary suspension of a license may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or other action. These proceedings shall be promptly instituted and determined.

Page 27: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Bias in Licensing Boards

Who sits on state licensing boards? What about the ones for small industries?

Why does the nature of state licensing boards potentially lead to bias? What due process problems does this pose?

27

Page 28: Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications

Law Licenses

Using lawyers as an example, what are the basic legal requirements for getting a license?

Are there opportunities for due process hearings? What if you flunk the bar? What if they decide you do not have the

character and fitness to take the bar?

28


Recommended