+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All...

Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All...

Date post: 29-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: malcolm-riley
View: 222 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
34
Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 4

Risk Assessment

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Engagement Risk

An auditor’s exposureto financial loss and

damage toprofessional reputation.

Client and thirdparty lawsuits

Negativepublicity

LO# 2

Local auditfailure …

4-2

Page 3: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Audit Risk

The risk that an auditor expresses an unqualified opinion on materially

misstated financial statements.

The risk that an auditor expresses an unqualified opinion on materially

misstated financial statements.

Financial statementlevel

Individual accountbalance or class

of transactions level

LO# 1

4-3

Page 4: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Audit Risk Model

Audit Risk = IR × CR × DR

Inherent risk and control risk:Risk of material misstatement

Nonsamplingrisk

Nonsamplingrisk

Samplingrisk

Samplingrisk

Detection risk:Risk that auditor will not detect misstatements

Inappropriate audit procedure Fail to detect when using

appropriate audit procedure Misinterpreting audit results

LO# 2

4-4

Page 5: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using the Audit Risk Model

Set a planned level of audit risk such that an opinion can be issued on the financial statements.

Assess the risk of material misstatement (IR x CR).

Use the audit risk equation to solve for the appropriate level of detection risk:

Set a planned level of audit risk such that an opinion can be issued on the financial statements.

Assess the risk of material misstatement (IR x CR).

Use the audit risk equation to solve for the appropriate level of detection risk:

AR = IR × CR × DR

DR = AR

IR × CR

Auditors use this level of detection risk to design audit procedures that will reduce audit risk to an acceptable level.

LO# 3

4-5

Page 6: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Relationship of the Entity’s Business Risks to the Audit Risk Model

Figure 4-1

LO# 3

4-6

Page 7: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Using the Audit Risk ModelLO# 3

Qualitative terms may also be used in the audit risk model.Qualitative terms may also be used in the audit risk model.

4-7

Page 8: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Limitations of theAudit Risk Model

PreliminaryAssessmentLevel of Risk

Actualor AchievedLevel of Risk

LO# 3

+ / –

The audit risk model is a planning tool, but it has some limitations that must be considered when the model is used to revise an audit plan or to evaluate audit results.

• The desired level of audit risk may not actually be achieved.

• It does not consider potential auditor error.

• There is no way of knowing what the preliminary level of risk actually was.

The audit risk model is a planning tool, but it has some limitations that must be considered when the model is used to revise an audit plan or to evaluate audit results.

• The desired level of audit risk may not actually be achieved.

• It does not consider potential auditor error.

• There is no way of knowing what the preliminary level of risk actually was.

4-8

Page 9: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Auditor’s RiskAssessment Process

Auditors need toidentify business risks andunderstand the potential

misstatements thatmay result.

Business risksare risks that result from

significant conditions, events,circumstances or actions thatimpair management’s ability

to execute strategies.

LO# 4

4-9

Page 10: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Auditor’s Risk Assessment ProcessFigure 4-2 An Overview of the Auditor’s Assessment of Business Risks and the Risk of

Material Misstatements

LO# 4

4-10

Page 11: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Auditor’s Risk Assessment Procedures(How do we gather this evidence?)

Inquiries of Management, Other Entity Personnel, and

Others Outside the Entity

Inquiries of Management, Other Entity Personnel, and

Others Outside the Entity

AnalyticalProcedures

Observationand Inspection

LO# 4

4-11

Page 12: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

LO# 4

Understanding the Entityand Its Environment

4-12

Page 13: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Understanding the Entityand Its Environment

Industry, Regulatory, and External

Factors

Nature ofthe Entity

InternalControl

Objectives, Strategies,and Business Risks

Entity PerformanceMeasures

LO# 4

4-13

Page 14: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Nature of the Entity The entity’s organizational structure and

management personnel. The sources of funding of the entity’s

operations and investment activities, including the entity’s capital structure, noncapital funding, and other debt instruments.

The entity’s investments. The entity’s operating characteristics,

including its size and complexity. The sources of the entity’s earnings,

including the relative profitability of key products and services.

Key supplier and customer relationships.

LO# 4

4-14

Page 15: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Industry, Regulatory, and Other External Factors

LO# 4

4-15

Page 16: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Understanding the Entityand Its Environment

LO# 4

4-16

Page 17: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Examples of misstatements include:

An inaccuracy in gathering or processing data from which financial statements are prepared.

A difference between the amount of a reported financial statement account and the amount that would have been reported under GAAP.

The omission of a financial statement element, account, or item.

An incorrect accounting estimate arising from an oversight or misinterpretation of facts.

Examples of misstatements include:

An inaccuracy in gathering or processing data from which financial statements are prepared.

A difference between the amount of a reported financial statement account and the amount that would have been reported under GAAP.

The omission of a financial statement element, account, or item.

An incorrect accounting estimate arising from an oversight or misinterpretation of facts.

LO# 5

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-17

Page 18: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Errors are unintentional misstatements: Mistakes in gathering or processing financial data used

to prepare financial statements. Unreasonable accounting estimates arising from

oversight or misinterpretation of facts. Mistakes in the application of accounting principles

relating to amount, classification, manner of presentation, or disclosure.

Errors are unintentional misstatements: Mistakes in gathering or processing financial data used

to prepare financial statements. Unreasonable accounting estimates arising from

oversight or misinterpretation of facts. Mistakes in the application of accounting principles

relating to amount, classification, manner of presentation, or disclosure.

LO# 5

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-18

Page 19: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fraud involves intentional misstatements. The fraud risk identification process includes: Sources of information about possible

fraud― Communications among the audit team Inquires of management and others Analytical procedures Unexpected period-end adjustments

Fraud involves intentional misstatements. The fraud risk identification process includes: Sources of information about possible

fraud― Communications among the audit team Inquires of management and others Analytical procedures Unexpected period-end adjustments

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-19

Page 20: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fraud involvesintentional misstatements.

Fraud involvesintentional misstatements.

Fraudulentfinancial reporting

Fraudulentfinancial reporting

Misappropriationof assets

Misappropriationof assets

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-20

Page 21: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Fraudulent financial reporting includes acts such as the following: Manipulation, falsification, or alteration of

accounting records or supporting documents used to prepare financial statements.

Misrepresentation in, or intentional omission from, the financial statements of events, transactions, or significant information.

Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to amount, classification, manner of presentation, or disclosure.

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-21

Page 22: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entity’s assets to the extent that financial statements are misstated.

Misappropriation of assets involves the theft of an entity’s assets to the extent that financial statements are misstated.

Stealing assets

Embezzlingcash received

Paying forgoods and services

not received by the company

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

Examples include:

4-22

Page 23: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Three conditions usuallyexist when fraud occurs.

Three conditions usuallyexist when fraud occurs.

Incentive orpressure to

perpetrate fraud

Incentive orpressure to

perpetrate fraud

Opportunityto carry out

the fraud

Opportunityto carry out

the fraud

Attitude orrationalizationto justify fraud

Attitude orrationalizationto justify fraud

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

(Fraud Triangle)

4-23

Page 24: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Financial stabilityor profitabilityis threatened

Financial stabilityor profitabilityis threatened

Excessive pressurefor management to

meet third partyexpectations

Excessive pressurefor management to

meet third partyexpectations

Management’s personalfinancial situation

is threatened

Management’s personalfinancial situation

is threatened

LO# 6

Fraudulent Financial ReportingRisk Factors Relating to Incentive/Pressure include:

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

(See Table 4-4)

4-24

Page 25: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Ineffectivemonitoring ofmanagement

Ineffectivemonitoring ofmanagement

Nature of the Industry or entity’s

operations

Nature of the Industry or entity’s

operations

Deficientinternalcontrol

Deficientinternalcontrol

Complex or unstable organizational

structure

Complex or unstable organizational

structure

LO# 6

Fraudulent Financial ReportingRisk Factors Relating to Opportunities include:

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

(See Table 4-5)

4-25

Page 26: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Risk Factors Relating to Attitudes/Rationalizations

(See Table 4-6)

Poor communicationchannels for reportinginappropriate behavior

Poor communicationchannels for reportinginappropriate behavior

Weak ethicalstandards formanagement

behavior

Weak ethicalstandards formanagement

behavior

Committing to aggressive or

unrealistic forecasts

Committing to aggressive or

unrealistic forecasts

Use ofinappropriate accounting

based on materiality

Use ofinappropriate accounting

based on materiality

LO# 6

Fraudulent Financial ReportingRisk Factors Relating to Attitudes/Rationalizations include:

4-26

Page 27: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

LO# 6

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement Due to Error or Fraud

4-27

Page 28: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Auditor’s Response tothe Risk Assessment (See Figure 4-3)

Financial statement level risks

Develop an overallresponse.

Determine what can go wrongat the account or assertion level.

LO# 7

Assess the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels.

Do these risks relate

pervasively to the financialstatements?

Design audit procedures for

assertion level risks.

Assertion level risks

Yes

No

4-28

Page 29: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Auditor’s Response to the Risk Assessment

LO# 7

To respond appropriately to financial statement level risks, the auditor may do the following: Emphasize to the audit team the need to maintain

professional skepticism. Assign more experienced staff or those with

specialized skills. Provide more supervision. Incorporate additional elements of unpredictability in

the selection of audit procedures.

4-29

Page 30: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of AuditTest Results

At the completion of the audit, the auditor should consider: 1. Whether the accumulated results of audit procedures affect the

assessments of the entity’s business risk and the risk of material misstatement, and

2. Whether the total misstatements cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.

THEN …

If the financial statements are materially misstated, the auditor should: 1. Request management to eliminate the material misstatement, or 2. If management does not make needed adjustments, the auditor

should issue a qualified or adverse opinion.

At the completion of the audit, the auditor should consider: 1. Whether the accumulated results of audit procedures affect the

assessments of the entity’s business risk and the risk of material misstatement, and

2. Whether the total misstatements cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.

THEN …

If the financial statements are materially misstated, the auditor should: 1. Request management to eliminate the material misstatement, or 2. If management does not make needed adjustments, the auditor

should issue a qualified or adverse opinion.

LO# 8

4-30

Page 31: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of AuditTest Results

If the auditor determines that the misstatement is or may be the result of fraud, and has determined that the effect could be material, the auditor should: Attempt to obtain audit evidence to determine whether, in fact,

material fraud has occurred and, if so, its effect. Consider the implications for other aspects of the audit. Discuss the matter and the approach to further investigation with

an appropriate level of management that is at least one level above those involved in committing the fraud and with senior management.

If appropriate, suggest that the client consult with legal counsel. Consider withdrawing from the engagement.

If the auditor determines that the misstatement is or may be the result of fraud, and has determined that the effect could be material, the auditor should: Attempt to obtain audit evidence to determine whether, in fact,

material fraud has occurred and, if so, its effect. Consider the implications for other aspects of the audit. Discuss the matter and the approach to further investigation with

an appropriate level of management that is at least one level above those involved in committing the fraud and with senior management.

If appropriate, suggest that the client consult with legal counsel. Consider withdrawing from the engagement.

LO# 8

4-31

Page 32: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Documentation of theAuditor’s Risk Assessment

The auditor should document: Discussions among engagement personnel. Procedures performed to identify and assess the risks

of material misstatement due to fraud. Risks of identified material misstatement due to fraud

and a description of the auditor’s response to the risks. Fraud risks or other conditions that result in additional

audit procedures. The nature of the communications about fraud made to

management, the audit committee, and others.

The auditor should document: Discussions among engagement personnel. Procedures performed to identify and assess the risks

of material misstatement due to fraud. Risks of identified material misstatement due to fraud

and a description of the auditor’s response to the risks. Fraud risks or other conditions that result in additional

audit procedures. The nature of the communications about fraud made to

management, the audit committee, and others.

LO# 9

4-32

Page 33: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Communications about Fraud

Whenever the auditor has found evidence that a fraud may exist, that matter should be brought to the attention of an appropriate level of management. Fraud involving senior management and fraud that causes a material misstatement of the financial statement should be reported directly to the audit committee of the board of directors.

The auditor should reach an understanding with the audit committee regarding the expected nature and extent of communications about misappropriations perpetrated by lower-level employees.

Whenever the auditor has found evidence that a fraud may exist, that matter should be brought to the attention of an appropriate level of management. Fraud involving senior management and fraud that causes a material misstatement of the financial statement should be reported directly to the audit committee of the board of directors.

The auditor should reach an understanding with the audit committee regarding the expected nature and extent of communications about misappropriations perpetrated by lower-level employees.

LO# 10

4-33

Page 34: Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The disclosure of fraud to parties other than the client’s senior management and its audit committee ordinarily is not part of the auditor’s responsibility and ordinarily would be precluded by the auditor’s ethical and legal obligations of confidentiality, except when the following conditions exist: To comply with certain legal and regulatory requirements. To a successor auditor when the successor makes inquiries of

the predecessor auditor about the client. In response to a subpoena. To a funding agency or other specified agency in accordance

with requirements for the audits of entities that receive governmental financial assistance.

The disclosure of fraud to parties other than the client’s senior management and its audit committee ordinarily is not part of the auditor’s responsibility and ordinarily would be precluded by the auditor’s ethical and legal obligations of confidentiality, except when the following conditions exist: To comply with certain legal and regulatory requirements. To a successor auditor when the successor makes inquiries of

the predecessor auditor about the client. In response to a subpoena. To a funding agency or other specified agency in accordance

with requirements for the audits of entities that receive governmental financial assistance.

LO# 10

Communications about Fraud

4-34


Recommended