__________________________________________________CHAPTER 4 Super Critical Fluid Extraction, Separation of Cu(II) with 5, 17- dinitro
11, 23-dihydroxamic acid 25, 26, 27, 28 tetra-hydroxythiacalix[4]arene
and Trace Determination with ICP- MS.
120
Abstract
A rapid and reproducible method has been developed to measure trace amount of
copper using supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Copper is extracted with Thia-
calix[4]arene hydroxamic acid (TC4HA) in dichloromethane by Supercritical
carbondioxide (SF-CO2) –dichloromethane (modifier) medium. The copper is extracted at
pH 4.0 and directly measured at λmax 317nm by spectrophotometry and also by ICP-MS.
The distribution ratio of copper was determined and the slope of log DM Vs TC4HA
concentration plot was found to be 1.0 which shows that extracted species in SF-CO2
extraction (SFE) give 1:1 Cu2+ and TC4HA complex. The extracted species both in SF-
CO2 extraction and solvent extraction were determined to be as [Cu(TC4HA)] complxes.
The copper is determined as low as nanogram level in presence of several cations and
anions. The effect of diluents, modifier concentration, temperature and pressure on the
extraction and separation of copper was discussed. The TC4HA has been successfully
used as carrier for efficient transport of Cu(II). Maximum transportation of Cu(II) was
observed for 20 min with t1/2 equal to 10.4 min.
121
Introduction
Lower viscosity and variable density of super critical fluids are primary
advantages of SFE over liquid-phase extraction. Mass transfer occurs more quickly and
efficiently in supercritical fluid than in liquid. Driven by the desire to limit in both
solvent usage and solvent waste generation, reduce analysis times, and increase
extraction efficiency, the practice of SFE has been growing at a rapid rate for several
years.
1-4Most of the published SFE works have focused on organic compounds and
studies have been published on SFE of metal ions5-9. One suggested approach of
extracting metal ions by SFE is to convert the charged metal ions into neutral metal
complexes by using chelating agents. Important requirements for the selection of suitable
chelating agents used in the complexation-SFE of metal ions includes high stability
constant of the metal complex, good solubility of the chelating agent and their metal
complex in supercritical CO . Transported in the supercritical CO . Supercritical CO2 2 2, as
a medium to transport metal ions has been investigated by many research facilities. Since
metal ions are only partly soluble in this non-polar medium, appreciable solubility of the
metal can be achieved only with a suitable derivatisation of the metal ions. Chelating
with fluorinated and non-fluorinated isologues of dialkyldithiocarbamates10– 12 and of
diketonates13,14, organophosphates15,16 and crown ethers17 has been exploited for complex
metal ions. .
Estimation of copper is usually carried out by flame18-20, graphite21-22 atomic
absorption spectrometry as well as chemiluminscence23 and electro thermal methods24, 25.
However, due to presence of copper in very low levels in environmental and bio-logical
122
samples different separation and preconcentration techniques such as liquid-liquid26 or
solid phase27-30, precipitation31, ion –exchange32 or floatation33 are necessary.
Such methods are time consuming, toxic and due to limited applicability there is
a need to develop a cleaner, non-toxic and environment friendly method for the
determination of metal ions. Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) using modified
supercritical fluid carbon dioxide, as the mobile phase is one such method, which has
recently gained importance in analysis of drugs, pharmaceuticals and even biological
fluids due to its unique capabilities and excellent features like low viscosity and high
diffusivity of the eluent. SFC provides fast mass transfer34,35 and thus allows high flow
rates combined with fast column equilibrium36,37. In addition, SFC has proven to be cost-
effective as minimum amount of organic solvent is required and replaces flammable toxic
solvents such as hexane, chloroform etc. Thus, the present technique was found to be a
useful alternative to the more conventional analytical techniques currently used in terms
of time consumption, sample preparation, selectivity and sensitivity. It also gives a
shorter overall analysis time, providing good chromatographic resolution with detection
limits similar to those obtained by LC and in some case more favorable than those of LC
with efficient separation38. Further, it has been noted that retention and selectivity in SFC
differ from those observed in commonly used RP-HPLC screening method as SFC can
reveal impurities not observed by RP-HPLC. Thus, the advantages shown for SFC were
speed, cost, and usage of lesser volume of toxic solvents, eco-friendliness and absence of
pollution.
Hydroxamic acids contain double coordination atoms (N, O-), which is easy to
react with Cu2+ and form stable neutral chelates. So, thia-calix[4]arene hydroxamic acid
123
was investigated as a chelating agent in the complexation-SFE of Cu2+ in our laboratory
and satisfactory results were obtained. This chapter represents that under the condition
which hydroxamic acids was selected as chelating reagent and DCM was used as
modifier for extraction of Cu2+ at desired column temperature and outlet pressure.
Moreover, transport of Cu(II) ions through a supported liquid membrane containing
TC4HA has been studied. The influence of pH, carrier concentration, temperature and
kinetics of transport is discussed.
Experimental
Chemicals
The solvent carbon dioxide gas 99.9% purity was purchased from the Bombay
Carbon Dioxide Co., Mumbai and used as such. All reagents were of analytical-reagent
grade of sigma-aldrich. Deionized water was used.
Reagent
Synthesis of 5, 17 dinitro 25, 26, 27, 28 tetra hydroxythiacalix[4]arene 11, 23
dihydroxamic acid (TC4HA) (Fig. 1) was synthesized as described in Chapter-2. Its 1.16 ×
10 M solution was prepared in dicholoromethane. -3
O HS
O H
SO H
S
OH
S
N
NO 2
NOH
O
OHO
O 2 N
Fig. 1 5, 17 dinitro , 25, 26, 27, 28 tetra hydroxythiacalix[4]arene 11, 23
dihydroxamicacid(TC4HA)
124
Metal solution
A standard copper solution was prepared by dissolving 0.3110 g of cupric
sulphate pentahydrate in 250 ml of double-distilled water. Its final concentration 4.18 x
10-3 M was determined by EDTA titration39 and ICP-MS.
Apparatus
SFE Instrumentation
The SFE apparatus was JASCO Supercritical Fluid Extractor / Chromatograph,
900-series configured for dynamic mixing with a two-pump system. It has the facility of
on line organic co-solvent addition to supercritical fluid gas. The flow rate of the pump
can be operated from 0.01 to 10.0 mL min-1. First, the CO2 gas cooled at -10ºC before
compression takes place using CH-201 series cooling circulator. Methanol was used as
cooling solvent JASCO-880-81 back pressure regulator used is capable of giving pressure
in the range of 9.5-45 MPa. JASCO-965 series air circulating oven was used for
controlling and maintaining the temperature of the extraction vessel. Special stainless
steel vessel with 1 mL to 15 mL capacities were fabricated to a maximum operating
pressure of 7000 psi with temperature accurately controlled in the range of 45 to 50° C
and also fitted with rheodyne valve. The extract was collected in an especially fabricated
glass vessel. Detection was done using a JASCO- UV-975 detector.
125
ICP-MS: Plasma Scan Model 710 Sequential plasma, Inductively Coupled Mass
Spectrophotometer with Plasma Scan multitasking computer and peristaltic
pump was used.
Optimized operating conditions for ICP-MS:
Instrumental parameters ICP-MS
ICP Plasma Argon
Forward Power 1.35 KW
Reflected Power <10 W
Gas flow (L/min)
Coolant 16
Carrier 0.70
Auxiliary 0.30
Nebuliser Pressure 2 bar
Solution uptake rate 0.8 mL/min
Sampler cone aperture 1 mm
Skimmer cone aperture 0.7 mm
Mass Number 63,65
UV-Spectrophotometer
JASCO 6300 double beam UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer with matched 1 cm
quartz cell was used for spectral measurements. A Labindia pH analyzer Model 6E488
was used for pH measurements.
126
SF-CO2 extraction (SFE)
The extraction studies were performed in a dynamic mode at the optimum flow
rate of the gas and the co-solvent. The SF-CO2 gas, at a known pressure and temperature,
was mixed with 1.16 × 10-3 M TC4HA in DCM and allowed to flow over the extraction
vessel. A solution containing copper with a volume of 5 μl was placed in the liquid
extraction vessel with 5 μl of buffer solution (pH 4.0) along with the ceramic fiber glass
needles and 1.16 × 10-3 M TC4HA in DCM as co-solvent fluid phase.
Determination of Cu(II)
-1Cu(II) solution of 10 ng ml transferred to 20 ml extraction vessel and Cu(II) is
extracted using dichloromethane solution of TC4HA after adjusting the pH of the aqueous
phase to 4.0 with acetate buffer. The organic layer is separated and Cu(II) is determined on
UV-Spectrophotometer.
Transport condition
2+Transport of Cu was carried out in a very special glass assembly as shown in the
figure. The reaction cell was about the capacity of 250 mls. A tube having a membrane was
settled on the upper side of the glass assembly. The transport was carried out by 10 ml of
4.18 x 10-5 M of copper solution at pH 4.0 as a source phase and 20 ml of 0.1N HNO3 as
receiving phase. The liquid membrane consists of 1 x 10-3 M TC4HA Solution. Continuous
reproducible stirring was carried out from top with mechanical stirrer and from bottom with
magnetic stirrer. The amount of copper transported was measured by ICP-MS.
127
Result and Discussion
The copper is extracted with DCM solution of TC4HA, which gives the Colorless
complex, λmax 317 nm, molar absorptivity 4.2 × 104 l mol-1 cm-1 and obeys Beer’s law in
the range of 1.2–20 μg ml-1 -1 and detection limit is 0.01 ng ml . After SFE, the extracts are
directly inserted into the plasma for ICP-MS measurement, which enhances the sensitivity
with detection limit up to ng level.
Effect of pH and extraction time
The optimum pH for maximum extraction was determined by carrying out the
extraction with various concentrations of copper and TC4HA. Moreover, the pH of the
aqueous phase was varied using the different buffer solutions. The extraction of copper
increases with the increase of pH until it level off at the pH 4. Thus the optimum pH for
an efficient extraction values lies within the range of 4.0–4.75 pH for copper (Table 1).
The low extractability at lower pH values may be attributed to the proton extraction to
organic phase rather than the metal ion itself. The extraction of copper by TC4HA was
very quick usually 1–1.5 min of oscillation was sufficient for complete extraction
equilibrium.
Effect of extractant concentration
-3The ligand concentration used was of 1.16 x 10 M as a stock and diluted further
to required concentrations. It was observed that percentage extraction increases with
increase in extractant concentration. The log D vs –log C plot is linear with a slop 1.04
indicating the association of 1M of the extractant per mole of Cu(II) in the extracted
metal species.
128
Effect of the solvent
The extraction experiments were carried out with pure and modified SF-CO2.
Extraction efficiencies were examined with pure and modified SF-CO2 with various
solvents viz chloroform, n-octanol, DCM etc. It has been observed that DCM modified
SF-CO2 was found to be the most appropriate solvents for quantitative extraction of
Copper (Table 3).
Table 1 Effect of pH on the extraction of Cu(II)- TC4HA complex
Cu(II) -12.6 μg ml Pressure 15 MPa Fluid/Co2 Flow 0.1 ml/1.0 ml
TC4HA -3 1.16 X 10 M Temp 45°c Buffer Acetate
Extraction pH
% ε* (l mol-1 -1 cm )
3.0 69 2.9 x 104
3.5 83 3.5 x104
4.0 100 4.2 x104
44.5 88 3.7x10
5.0 76 3.2 x104
45.5 71 3.0x10
ε* Molar Absorptivity
129
Table 2 Effect of reagent concentration on Cu(II)- TC4HA complex
Cu(II) -12.6 μg ml Pressure 15 MPa Fluid/Co2 Flow 0.1 ml/1.0 ml
TC4HA -3 1.16 X 10 M Temp 45°c Buffer Acetate
Cu(II) TC4HA
(10-4M)
-log
(TC4HA) [Cu]org × 10-5
Log
+2(D ) Cu[Cu]aq × 10-5
0.232 4.63 3.97 0.219 1.25
0.464 4.33 4.08 0.116 1.54
0.696 4.15 4.12 0.078 1.72
0.928 4.03 4.10 0.021 1.89
y = -1.0455x + 6.0846R2 = 0.9952
11.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.9
2
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8
-log C
log
D
Fig 1 Plot of log D Vs –log [TC4HA]
130
Table 3 Effect of pure and modified SF-CO2 in the extraction of Cu(II)-TC4HA
complex
Extraction Solvent
% ε* (l mol-1 -1 cm )
4Chloroform + SF-CO (20 MPa) 30 1.2 x102
Dichloromethane + SF-CO2 (20 MPa) 100 4.2 x 104
4n-octanol + SF-CO (20 MPa) 24 1.1 x 102
Toluene + SF-CO (20 MPa) z* z* 2
ε* Molar Absorptivity z* No Extraction
Effect of pressure and temperature
Varying the pressure and temperature significantly affects extraction efficiency.
The results show that increasing the pressure and temperature of system increases
%extraction. This may be due to increasing solubility of TC4HA and its Cu(II) complex.
Its concluded that 20 MPa pressure and 45°C is adequate for quantitative extraction of
Cu(II) with TC4HA using SF-CO . 2
131
Stoichiometry of Cu(II) with TC4HA:
The TC4HA dissolves in SF-CO2-n-octanol at pH 4.0 and the ligand extract
Cu(II) efficiently from aqueous solution of pH 4.0. The distribution behavior of Cu(II) in
SFE with TC4HA (2HA), can be represented as
SF-CO2
Aq. Phase
2 HA . CO2
Cu+2A2 . CO2 (Cu+2 . A2) : CO22CO TC4HA.
2 2 2HA H A+↔ + −
+
…..(1)
2 2[ ] 2 [ ] ( )[ ] 22 2 2C u aq H A C O H C u A C O H
+ ++ → + ..(2)
The distribution of copper is given by
22
22 2
H C u AC O
DC u C u
aq
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
+
=+ + …..(3)
The composition of the Cu(II)-TC4HA complex extracted into dichloromethane
and SF-CO 2logCu
D +has been studied plotting Vs –log[TC4HA]2 org
, which gives the
straight line with a slope of 1.0 shows the stoichiometry of the complex to be 1 : 1.
Method confirm one moles of the ligand (TC4HA) is required for one mole of Cu(II) and
the expected structure of the complex can be of the type [H(Cu2+A )]. 2
132
Interference study:
The effect of various cations and anions that can influence the performance of the
present method has been studied. Interference studies were made by using the solution
containing 10 ng ml-1 copper and various concentrations of the foreign ions. The intensity
of the organic phase was measured by ICP-MS.
Table 5 Effect of Diverse Ions and selectivity factor on extraction of Cu(II)–
TC4HA comple x
Cu(II) -110 ng ml Pressure 15 MPa Fluid/CO Flow 0.1ml/1.0ml 2
TC4HA -31.16 X 10 M Temp. 45°c λ max 317nm
Cu(II) found (μg ml-1) Amount Foreign ion Added as
added (mg) Spectrophotometry ICP-MS
+ 9.997±0.05 Ag Ag(NO3) 40 9.998± 0.03 2
+Ca CaCl 40 9.997±0.05 9.99 ± 0.08 2
+2An ZnSO 40 9.997±0.05 9.98 ± 0.07 4
CO+2 CO(NO ) 40 10.03 ± 0.04 10.008 ± 0.003 3 2
+2Ni NiCl 40 9.98 ± 0.02 10.005 ± 0.005 2
Mn+2 MnCl 50 9.97 ± 0.04 9.998± 0.004 2
Mg+2 MgSO 50 10.05 ± 0.05 9.995± 0.006 4
+2Hg HgCl 50 9.98± 0.03 9.997± 0.005 2
+2Pb Pb(NO ) 60 9.98± 0.04 9.997± 0.005 3 2
+3Al AlCl 40 9.97± 0.04 9.005± 0.007 3
133
134
Fe+3 FeCl3 50 10.01± 0.03 9.993± 0.008
Ba+2 BaCl2 50 10.03± 0.05 9.003± 0.005
Th+4 Th(NO3)4 50 9.98± 0.03 9.994± 0.005
Cr+ CrCl3.6H2O 60 9.99± 0.02 9.995± 0.005
V+5 NH4VO3 60 10.01± 0.02 10.001± 0.003
La+ La(NO3)3 40 10.05± 0.03 9.999± 0.001
Transportation of Copper:
The mechanism of the transport of Cu(II) from membrane has been systematically
represented in Figure 8. The copper ions are absorbed into the membrane due to complex
formation with TC4HA at the interface between the membrane and receiving solution
where Cu+2 is released to aqueous phase due to the stripping action of H+ ion. The free
carrier diffuses back to the interface at the feed side to form another complex with
available fresh ions. The effect of pH variation of the feed solution on the permeation of
copper was also studied moreover, membrane study was also carried out for maximum
transportation of ions. Results show that 0.1M HNO3 is ideal for quantitatively stripping
of Cu+2 ions. The amount of Cu(II) was measured by ICP-MS. As a proof fig. 3 shows
that concentration of cu+2 is started to decrease continuously in a feed phase and reach
lower than the detection limit after 20min.On the other side concentration of metal is
continuously increasing in receiving phase. It clearly indicates that metal ions are
transported through membrane from source phase to receiving phase within the given
period of time. It has been observed that maximum transport of Cu(II) is observed till 20
min with t1/2 = 10.4 min.
Source Phase
Mechanical Stirrer
Recieving Phase
Magnetic Stirrer
Liquid Membrane Phase
Fig 2 . Transportation Cell
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (Mins)
%C
u(II)
Recieving Phase Feed Phase
Fig 3. Transport Profile for Cu+2 through the membrane phase containing TC4HA at
30°C
135
Table 6 Determination of Cu(II) in Food, Biological and Environmental samples.
a -1Cu(II) found (μg ml ) Sample
136
Spectrophotometry ICP-MS
Human Hair (Male) 12.50 ± 0.08 12.449± 0.0002
Human Hair (Female) 23.50 ± 0.08 23.502 ± 0.0003
Tea Leaves 0.049 ± 0.001 0.0488 ± 0.0001
PepperBush 0.0566 ± 0.002 0.0569 ± 0.0002
Chlorella 3.301 ± 0.01 3.299 ± 0.0001
Wheat Flour 6.212 ± 0.04 6.214 ± 0.0002
Potatoes 4.694 ± 0.01 4.701 ± 0.0001
Carrotes 2.530 ± 0.04 2.531 ± 0.0002
Table 7 Determination of copper in Spiked Water Samples
Cu(II) found (μg ml-1) Sample Spiked Value of
Cu(II) (μg ml-1) Found Value (Recovery%)
ICP-MS
+Tap Water 10 100% 10 0.558
Sea Water* 10 99.8% 9.98± 0.412
+Mineral Water 10 99.9% 9.99 0.05
* Sea water from Apollo Bandar.
137
Conclusion:
A new reagent (Fig.1) was synthesised by the introduction of the thia-calixarene
derivative in to the functionality of hydroxamic acid which gave a chelating system used
successfully for the extraction and determination of Cu(II).
The SFC significantly improved sensitivity in ICP-MS compared to many other
methods and allows Cu(II) to determine with detection limit 10.0 ng ml-1 and separate it
in presence of foreign substances. Moreover, Cu(II) are separated and extracted from
environmental and biological samples with recovery of 99.9%.
138
Reference:
1. Ding M Y, Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 15 (1997) 527-529.
2. Yue L H &6 Wai C M, Trends Anal Chem, 14 (1995) 123-132.
3 Holst C V & Wenclawiak B W, Anal Chem., 69 (1997) 601-606.
4 Meguro Y., Lso S, Sasaki T & Yoshida Z, Anal Chem, 70 (1998) 774-779.
5 Waind C M & Yue L H, Talanta, 40 (1993) 1325-1330.
6 Lin Y, R. Brauer D, Laintz K E & Wai C M, Anal Chem, 65 (1993) 2549-2551.
7 Wang S, Elshanl S & Wai C W, Anal Chem, 67 (1995) 919-923.
8 Luque de C M D & Tena M T, Trends Anal Chem, 15 (1996) 32-37.
9 Laintz K E, Hale C D, Stark P, Wilkinson J & Rouquette C L, Anal Chem, 70
(1998) 400-404.
10 Laintz K E, Wai C M, Yonkar C R & Smith R D, Anal Chem, 64 (1992) 2875-
2878.
11 Liu Y, Lopez-Avila V, Alcaraz M, Beckert W F & Heithmar E M, J
Chromatogr Sci 31 (1993) 310-316.
12 Wang J & Marshall W D, Anal Chem., 66 (1994)1658-1663.
13 Lin Y & Wai C M, Anal Chem., 66 (1994) 1971-1975.
14 Lainz K E & Tachikawa E, Anal Chem, 66 (1994) 2190-2193.
15 Smart N G, Carleson T E, Kast T, Clifford A A, Burford M D & Wai C M,
Talanta, 44 (1997) 137-150.
16 Smart N G, Carleson T E, Elshani S, Wang S F & Wai C M, Ind Eng Chem Res,
36 (1997) 1819-1826.
17 Wang S F, Elshani S & Wai C M, Anal Chem, 67 (1995) 919-923.
139
18 Hashemi P & Bagheri S, Fathi M R, Talanta, 68 (2005) 72-78.
19 Ashtari P, Wang K, Yang X, Huang S & Yamini Y, Anal Chim Acta, 550
(2005) 18-23.
20 Cassella R J, Magalhães O I B, Couto M T, Lima E L S, Neves M A F S,
Coutinho F M B, Talanta, 67 (2005) 121-128.
21 Acar O, Talanta, 65 (2005) 672-677.
22 Cabon J Y, Spectrochim Acta B, 57 (2002) 939-950.
23 Lloret S M, Falcó P C, Cárdenas S, Gallego M & Valcárcel M, Talanta, 64
(2004) 1030-1035.
24 Szigeti Z, Bitter I, Toth K, Latkoczy C, Fliegel D J, Gunther D & Pretsch E, Anal
Chim Acta, 532 (2005) 129-136.
25 Hurst M P & Bruland K W, Anal Chim Acta, 546 (2005) 68-78.
26 Barrera P B, Piñeiro A M, Iglesias R G & Barrera A B, Spectrochim Acta B, 57
(2002) 1951-1966.
27 Kendüzler E & Türker A R, Anal Chim Acta, 480 (2003) 259-266.
28 Lemos V A & Baliza P X, Talanta, 67 (2005) 564-570.
29 Tokman N, Akman S & Ozeroglu C, Talanta, 63 (2004) 699-703.
30 Da Silva E L, Ganzarolli E M & Carasek E, Talanta, 62 (2004) 727-733.
31 Soylak M, Saracoglu S, Divrikli U & Elci L, Talanta, 66 (2005) 1098-1102.
32 Scaccia S, Zappa G & Basili N, J Chromatogra A, 915 (2001) 167-175.
33 Undeva K, Stafilov T & Pavlovska G, Microchem J, 65 (2000) 165-175.
34 Petersen M, J Chromatogr, 505 (1990) 3-18.
140
35 Macaudiere P, Tambute A, Caude M, Rosset R, Alembik M C & Wainer I W,
J Chromatogr, 371 (1986) 177-193.
36 Lee C R, Porziemsky J P, Aubert M C & Krstulovic A M. J Chromatogr, 539
(1991) 55-69.
37 Grere D R, Board R & McManigill D, Anal Chem, 54 (1982) 736-741.
38 Dhorda U J, Bari V R & Sundaresan M.. Methods in Biotechnology.
Williams J R & Clifford A A , supercritcal fluid methods and protocols.
In editors. New Jersey: Humana Press 5 14 (1999).
39 Vogel A I, “Vogel’s Text book of quantitative analysis-3rd Edn.” (1989) 971.