CHAPTER 4
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
4. Key Performance Indicators
73
As the study was focused on Key Performance Indicators of Information
Systems in banking industry, the researcher would evaluate whether the IS
implemented in bank was integrated and working effectively as per Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). But before that the researcher should identify
the performance indicators. These performance indicators were identified
through review of existing literature and in consultation with academicians and
practitioners. Once certain performance indicators are identified, then they
were tested on the respondents through the main survey in the form of a
structured questionnaire. These performance indicators were also called
parameters interchangeably for convenience. These parameters once tested
and applied through a proposed model formed the Key Performance
Indicators for studying the other objectives further. The parameters would
form the indicators on basis of which we could evaluate the effectiveness of
Information System in the bank. These parameters have been drawn on the
basis of exhaustive feedback from the industry and academia. Initially 71
parameters were identified for measuring the performance of Information
System in post implementation scenario in banking industry. These are listed
as given below:
1. Availability of documented procedures for all activities to be carried.
2. Availability of user manuals for each item of application software.
3. Availability of all information in electronic form properly indexed,
labeled and readily retrievable.
4. Improved house-keeping after IS implementation.
4. Key Performance Indicators
74
5. Management of data security by proper use of login and password
policy for authentication.
6. Management of data administration.
7. Maintenance of user groups.
8. Proper granting of access rights at individual and group levels.
9. Clear authorization limits for data entry, verification, cancel, reverse,
view, etc.
10. Proper handling of temporary users in the system.
11. Proper security to the database.
12. Accessibility of database only to the authorized users on authorized
terminals.
13. Security of data against crashes.
14. Proper precautions against viruses.
15. Protection to bank’s network and server infrastructure against
intrusions and malfunctioning.
16. Prevention of hacking after implementation of IS.
17. No wrong transactions in customer accounts after IS implementation.
18. No frauds or irregularities due to malfunction of IS.
19. System for identifying abnormal transactions in IS.
20. Secure communication channels established for remote access of
system applications.
21. Proper record maintenance of changes made, date of change, person
who authorized the same, person who made the change, table
readings before and after the change.
22. Policy for backup of data.
4. Key Performance Indicators
75
23. Maintenance & monitoring of the back-up logs.
24. Handling of sensitive information during transmission.
25. Proper logging of all user activities.
26. Capturing and logging of all changes to master information.
27. Maintaining consistency and integrity of data during migration of data.
28. Testing of IS before putting into operations.
29. Mechanism to manage back date entries.
30. All entries in IS in bank as per accounting standards used.
31. Proper business continuity plan for bank in case of IS crisis.
32. High uptime for IS applications.
33. Replication of databases to cover the risk of data loss.
34. Proper contingency plan in case of server crash.
35. Reduction in time per transaction or overall process time.
36. Removal of redundancy and saving of time.
37. Simplified work processes leading to reduced workload and paperwork.
38. Reduced physical movements.
39. Greater accuracy and minimal error in operational data.
40. Proper handling of adjustments and corrections by the system.
41. Increase in level of customer satisfaction, hence increase in satisfied
customer base.
42. Existing customers of the bank opting for new products and services.
43. Positive feedback of customers for IS of the bank.
44. Reporting to senior authority becoming quicker and easier.
45. Efficient flow of information internally and externally.
46. Employee getting all relevant information timely.
4. Key Performance Indicators
76
47. Better communication among the functional areas and various
branches.
48. Increased flexibility and multiple options for handling data and
evaluating information.
49. Adaptability to the changes in business dynamics in the internal &
external environment.
50. Reduced the cost per transaction.
51. High levels of efficiency gains and cost cutting.
52. Increase in profits of the bank.
53. Helps in optimal utilization of resources.
54. Increase in efficiency and effectiveness of bank.
55. Increased Return on Investment on IS with time.
56. Percentage of online transactions increased as compared to branch
transactions.
57. Helps banks to become high quality and low cost producer.
58. Productivity of employees increased after the implementation of IS.
59. Helps in increased products and services innovation.
60. Availability of internet banking facilities.
61. Helps in creating new opportunities for cross-selling and targeting
products.
62. Easier and increased trade on global level with banks of other nations.
63. Improved monitoring and reporting.
64. Managing of Information in required format and hence helps in quick
decision-making.
65. Improved decision-making by providing explicit and clear reports.
4. Key Performance Indicators
77
66. Getting more precise and timely information for coordination of daily
operations of the business.
67. Supports long term planning activities of the bank.
68. Easier to tap the right customer at the right time.
69. Helps in reshaping jobs and workflows, hence rightsizing the
workforce.
70. Easier and quicker to do the performance appraisal of the employee.
71. Helps in better segregation of duties and delegation of authority and
responsibility.
Initially, these 71 parameters were identified on the basis of literature and
consultations with academicians and experts in the area of IS, after proper
brainstorming and rigorous discussions, for measuring the performance of
Information System in banking industry. For more clarity and focus these 71
parameters were classified into 19 broad categories. These 71 parameters
were putted into a questionnaire in assertive statement form. These
statements are measured on a Likert scale of Strongly Agree (5), Agree (4),
Neutral (3), Disagree (4), Strongly Disagree (1). A pilot survey was conducted
on these 71 parameters classified in to 19 categories. The main findings and
feedback from that pilot survey were:
a) The questionnaire covers almost all the aspects of evaluating IS in
post-implementation scenario.
b) Certain parameters were overlapping with each other.
c) There was a problem of fatigue while filling of questionnaire by the
respondent.
4. Key Performance Indicators
78
d) Certain questions could be converted in to quantifiable statements or
categories instead of assertive statements on Likert scale.
After getting feedback from the pilot survey and doing necessary mergers, the
numbers of parameters were brought down to 40. These 40 parameters or
variables are listed below:
1. Availability of documented procedures and user manuals for all
activities.
2. Availability of all information in electronic form properly indexed,
labeled and readily retrievable.
3. Management of data security by proper use of login and password
policy.
4. Management of data administration by giving access rights for data
entry, verification, cancel, reverse, view, etc.
5. Providing security to database against viruses.
6. Protection to Bank’s network and server infrastructure against
intrusions and malfunctioning.
7. System for identifying abnormal transactions in IS.
8. Establishment of secure communication channels for remote access of
system applications.
9. Reduced chances of error or irregularities in transactions of customer
accounts.
10. Maintenance and monitoring of back-up logs as per data backup policy.
11. Proper system for capturing and logging changes to master
information.
4. Key Performance Indicators
79
12. Maintenance of consistency and integrity of data during migration of
data.
13. Proper mechanism to manage back date entries.
14. Following banking standards for managing all entries.
15. Proper business continuity plan in case of contingencies like server
crash, etc.
16. Low downtime for IS applications.
17. Reduced time per transaction or overall process time.
18. Removal of redundancy or duplication of work.
19. Simplified work processes leading to reduced workload and paperwork
and physical movements.
20. Proper handling of adjustments and corrections.
21. Increase in data accuracy levels.
22. Increase in level of customer satisfaction, hence increase in satisfied
customer base.
23. Increased percentage of existing customers of the bank opting for new
products and services of bank.
24. Efficient flow of information inward or outward of the organization..
25. Enabling better communication among the employees of various
functional areas and various branches.
26. Increased flexibility and given multiple options for handling data and
evaluating information.
27. Adaptable to changes in business dynamics in the internal & external
environment.
28. Reduced cost per transaction.
4. Key Performance Indicators
80
29. Helps in optimal utilization of IT resources.
30. Increase in Return on Investment on IS.
31. Increase in percentage of online transactions.
32. Availability of internet banking facilities.
33. Helps in creating new opportunities for cross-selling and targeting
products.
34. Easier trade with banks of other nations.
35. Increased products and services innovation.
36. Improved decision-making by providing explicit and clear reports in
required format.
37. Supports long term planning activities of the bank.
38. Easier to tap the right customer at the right time.
39. Helps in reshaping jobs and workflows, hence rightsizing the
workforce.
40. Easier and quicker to do performance appraisal of the employees.
These 40 selected parameters were framed in the final questionnaire and
categorized into 18 goals. The main questionnaire contains most of the
statements in assertive form. These statements have been evaluated on 5-
point Likert scale by the respondents. Certain questions were converted in to
quantifiable statements or categories instead of assertive statements on Likert
scale.
The foremost objective of the research was to identify the Key Performance
Indicators of IS. Once main survey was conducted, these 40 parameters
4. Key Performance Indicators
81
helped us to draw certain factors through factor analysis of data collected.
The data collected through the questionnaire provided inputs for the factor
analysis. The factor analysis is a data reduction technique that can help the
researcher to reduce the number of variables or parameters to a manageable
number. The factor analysis was required as 40 parameters identified could
not be easily manageable from the perspective of a banker who wants to
evaluate the working of a bank on the basis of Key Performance Indicators.
The factor analysis ideally will reduce the number of variables to about one-
third of its actual variables.
4.1 Application of Factor Analysis
Table 10 : KMO and Bartlett’s Test values
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .811
Approx. Chi-Square 2.464E3
df 780
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Sig. .000
High values of KMO (between 0.5 and 1.0) indicate factor analysis is
appropriate. Values below 0.5 imply that factor analysis may not be
appropriate. In this research, the KMO measure of sampling adequacy gives
value of 0.811, which is more than enough for applying factor analysis
technique.
4. Key Performance Indicators
82
The population correlation matrix was an identity matrix; each variable
correlates perfectly with itself (r=1) but had no correlation with the other
variables (r=0). A large value of Chi-square favoured the rejection of null
hypothesis. It showed that variables were correlated in population. So factor
analysis was appropriate.
Table 11 : Total Variance explained during Factor Analysis
Total Variance Explained
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Com
pone
nt Total
% of
Variance
Cumulative
% Total
% of
Varian
ce
Cumulative
% Total
% of
Variance
Cumulative
%
1 9.377 23.441 23.441 9.377 23.441 23.441 3.279 8.198 8.198
2 2.516 6.291 29.732 2.516 6.291 29.732 2.927 7.317 15.515
3 1.893 4.733 34.466 1.893 4.733 34.466 2.543 6.357 21.872
4 1.720 4.299 38.765 1.720 4.299 38.765 2.437 6.093 27.965
5 1.591 3.977 42.742 1.591 3.977 42.742 2.212 5.531 33.495
6 1.502 3.756 46.498 1.502 3.756 46.498 2.178 5.444 38.940
7 1.502 3.754 50.252 1.502 3.754 50.252 2.019 5.049 43.988
8 1.291 3.227 53.478 1.291 3.227 53.478 1.997 4.992 48.980
9 1.243 3.109 56.587 1.243 3.109 56.587 1.696 4.239 53.219
10 1.169 2.922 59.509 1.169 2.922 59.509 1.670 4.176 57.395
11 1.097 2.742 62.251 1.097 2.742 62.251 1.617 4.042 61.437
12 1.066 2.664 64.916 1.066 2.664 64.916 1.391 3.478 64.916
13 .966 2.416 67.332
14 .933 2.333 69.665
15 .865 2.163 71.828
4. Key Performance Indicators
83
16 .831 2.077 73.905
17 .805 2.012 75.917
18 .758 1.894 77.812
19 .733 1.832 79.644
20 .666 1.664 81.308
21 .647 1.617 82.925
22 .613 1.532 84.457
23 .593 1.482 85.939
24 .529 1.323 87.262
25 .486 1.215 88.477
26 .456 1.139 89.616
27 .435 1.089 90.705
28 .434 1.086 91.791
29 .392 .980 92.771
30 .355 .887 93.658
31 .341 .851 94.510
32 .313 .782 95.292
33 .297 .743 96.035
34 .282 .705 96.740
35 .277 .693 97.433
36 .256 .640 98.072
37 .224 .560 98.632
38 .197 .492 99.124
39 .189 .472 99.596
40 .161 .404 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
4. Key Performance Indicators
84
Table 12 : Rotated Component Matrix with Varimax method
Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Ques1 .191 -.043 .031 .068 .232 -.151 .119 .472 .435 .056 .329 .083
Ques2 .214 -.022 .131 .137 .123 -.010 .004 .082 .768 .087 .025 -.030
Ques3 .637 -.084 -.045 .087 .344 -.055 .083 .196 .021 -.059 .067 -.103
Ques4 .257 .167 .010 .044 .659 .014 -.006 .033 .229 .016 .020 .046
Ques5 .703 .049 .087 .012 .084 .156 .215 -.001 .218 -.074 .056 -.022
Ques6 .485 .047 .254 .121 -.006 .119 .050 -.293 .267 .276 .216 .202
Ques7 .292 .174 -.033 .606 .154 -.044 .056 -.147 .285 .190 .058 .089
Ques8 .412 .118 .027 .220 .380 .402 -.050 .097 .272 .143 -.138 -.046
Ques9 .091 -.056 .097 .098 .667 .185 .133 -.002 .030 .196 .114 .055
Ques10 .117 .063 .308 .390 .269 .049 -.200 .105 .122 .063 .407 -.192
Ques11 .471 .094 .365 .253 .366 .095 -.078 .299 .011 .025 .111 -.147
Ques12 .512 .096 .283 .283 .091 .181 -.018 .089 .290 .193 .215 -.011
Ques13 .467 .198 -.124 -.022 .068 -.069 .050 .463 -.079 .070 .418 .112
Ques14 .426 .156 -.097 .043 .111 -.004 .151 .208 .006 .537 .185 .030
Ques15 .611 .140 .195 .172 .071 .249 -.168 .059 -.090 .200 -.010 .235
Ques16 -.037 -.052 .168 .047 .109 .186 -.049 .009 .163 .729 .013 -.035
Ques17 .119 .136 .678 -.073 .183 .094 .012 .162 .060 .134 .150 .108
Ques18 .178 .069 .159 .075 .083 .114 .225 -.074 .101 .055 .733 -.068
Ques19 -.014 .040 .696 .079 -.157 .076 .034 -.053 .102 .088 .072 .048
Ques20 .289 .144 .606 .192 .112 .101 .183 .053 -.046 -.229 -.148 -.217
Ques21 .092 -.122 .166 .199 .093 .419 .311 .163 -.211 .332 .189 -.157
Ques22 -.087 .198 .462 .021 .301 -.132 .212 .280 -.054 .141 .171 .255
4. Key Performance Indicators
85
Ques23 .028 .022 .049 .037 .090 .041 -.040 .039 -.026 -.034 -.055 .869
Ques24 .123 .144 .139 -.015 -.024 .314 .117 .749 .120 .031 -.067 .074
Ques25 .067 .268 .190 .359 .019 .075 .221 .533 .068 .111 -.168 -.125
Ques26 .023 .400 .121 .004 .205 .644 .139 .048 -.004 .075 .264 -.074
Ques27 .217 .126 .119 .158 .068 .755 .074 .136 .077 .089 -.064 .116
Ques28 .011 -.059 .072 .016 .011 .187 .721 .270 .045 .005 .155 .048
Ques29 -.075 .419 -.008 .089 .060 .290 .275 .090 .490 .024 .104 -.080
Ques30 .056 .299 -.002 .188 .250 -.007 .543 -.029 .072 .121 .095 -.148
Ques31 .225 .404 .265 .041 -.202 .028 .413 -.086 -.002 -.199 .189 .135
Ques32 .211 .341 -.200 .025 .454 .392 .060 -.122 -.221 .047 .166 .230
Ques33 .200 .052 .168 .500 .357 .076 .242 .095 .040 -.024 -.136 .189
Ques34 .066 .660 .127 .048 -.022 .098 .073 .091 .116 .012 -.037 .254
Ques35 .107 .468 .066 .061 .102 -.034 .356 -.003 -.089 .486 -.090 -.007
Ques36 .222 .263 .402 .061 .091 .087 .434 .107 .154 .175 -.245 -.072
Ques37 .132 .662 .193 .195 .171 .081 .062 .045 -.026 .024 .061 -.118
Ques38 -.034 .750 .018 .251 .019 .128 -.053 .153 .004 .012 .053 -.047
Ques39 .131 .142 .117 .580 -.038 .348 .240 .270 .063 .090 -.039 .101
Ques40 .003 .255 .005 .801 .019 .077 -.014 .007 .020 -.032 .139 -.062
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 22 iterations.
Hence factors with a variance greater than 1.0 were included. In this research
there have been 12 factors which had eigenvalue greater than 1.0.
In research it was recommended that the factors extracted should account for
at least 60 percent of the variance. In this research the factors extracted
account for 65 percent of the variance.
4. Key Performance Indicators
86
4.2 Factors Identified after Factor Analysis
After following the various approaches mentioned above for determining the
number of factors, it was concluded that 12 factors were fulfilling the broad
requirements of factor determination. These 12 factors would act as Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs) of Information Systems. These 12 factors are
based on the consolidation of 40 variables that are put into assertive
statement form on 5-point Likert scale.
The variables and the converted factors are mentioned below:
Table 13 : Factors and the list of variables covered under each factor
Factor No.
Factor List of variables covered under each factor
1 Data Integrity &
Network Security • Management of data security by proper use of
login and password policy.
• Providing security to database against viruses.
• Protection to Bank’s network and server
infrastructure against intrusions and
malfunctioning.
• Establishment of secure communication
channels for remote access of system
applications.
• Proper system for capturing and logging
changes to master information.
• Maintenance of consistency and integrity of data
during migration of data.
• Proper mechanism to manage back date entries.
• Proper business continuity plan in case of
contingencies like server crash, etc.
2 Long Term
Planning • Easier trade with banks of other nations.
• Supports long term planning activities of the
bank.
• Easier to tap the right customer at the right
4. Key Performance Indicators
87
time.
3 Transactional
Effectiveness
• Reduced time per transaction or overall process
time.
• Simplified work processes leading to reduced
workload and paperwork and physical
movements.
• Proper handling of adjustments and corrections.
• Increase in level of customer satisfaction, hence
increase in satisfied customer base.
4 Resource
Utilization
• System for identifying abnormal transactions in
IS.
• Helps in creating new opportunities for cross-
selling and targeting products.
• Helps in reshaping jobs and workflows, hence
rightsizing the workforce.
• Easier and quicker to do performance appraisal
of the employees.
5 Data Management • Management of data administration by giving
access rights for data entry, verification, cancel,
reverse, view, etc.
• Reduced chances of error or irregularities in
transactions of customer accounts.
• Availability of internet banking facilities.
6 Flexibility for Data
Handling
• Increased flexibility and given multiple options for
handling data and evaluating information.
4. Key Performance Indicators
88
• Adaptable to changes in business dynamics in the
internal & external environment.
7 Cost Control
Management
• Reduced cost per transaction.
• Increase in Return on Investment on IS.
• Increase in percentage of online transactions.
• Improved decision-making by providing explicit
and clear reports in required format.
8 Flow of Information • Availability of documented procedures and user
manuals for all activities.
• Efficient flow of information inward or outward of
the organization.
• Enabling better communication among the
employees of various functional areas and
various branches.
9 E-Documentation • Availability of all information in electronic form
properly indexed, labeled and readily retrievable.
• Helps in optimal utilization of IT resources.
10 System Efficiency • Following banking standards for managing all entries
• Low downtime for IS applications.
• Removal of redundancy or duplication of work.
• Increase in data accuracy levels.
• Increased products and services innovation.
11 Backup Policy • Maintenance and monitoring of back-up logs per
data backup policy.
4. Key Performance Indicators
89
12 Customer
Satisfaction Level
• Increased percentage of existing customers of
the bank opting for new products and services
of bank.
So the 12 factors mentioned above will act as Key Performance Indicators of
IS. These 12 factors are ranked by the statistical tool as per the variance they
offer. These 12 factors or KPIs are listed in the rank of their importance as
mentioned below:
1. Data Integrity & Network Security
2. Long Term Planning
3. Transactional Effectiveness
4. Resource Utilization
5. Data Management
6. Flexibility for Data Handling
7. Cost Control Management
8. Flow of Information
9. E-Documentation
10. Information System Efficiency
11. Backup Policy
12. Customer Satisfaction Level
In banking there are varied factors that affect Information System
performance inclusive of factors mentioned above. The effectiveness of IS
could be proved only if it satisfies the needs of various stakeholders of
4. Key Performance Indicators
90
Table 14 : Factors and the list of statements covered under each factor
Factor No. Factor List of Statements covering each factor
1 Data Integrity &
Network Security
Statements No. 3, 5, 6, 8,11, 12, 13, 15
2 Long Term
Planning
Statements No. 34, 37, 38
3 Transactional
Effectiveness
Statements No. 17, 19, 20, 22
4 Resource
Utilization
Statements No. 7, 33, 39, 40
5 Data Management Statements No. 4, 9, 32
6 Flexibility for Data
Handling
Statements No. 26, 27
7 Cost Control
Management
Statements No. 28, 30, 31, 36
8 Flow of Information Statements No. 1, 24, 25
9 E-Documentation Statements No. 2, 29
10 System Efficiency Statements No. 14, 16, 18, 21, 35
11 Backup Policy Statement No. 10
12 Customer
Satisfaction Level
Statement No. 23
Information System in banks, i.e., Investor of IS, Developer of IS, Strategic
User of IS, the employee who is End user of IS, and Customer of bank who is
4. Key Performance Indicators
91
directly or indirectly affected by working of IS in bank. The Information System
used should be fully integrated in the functioning of bank. Whether the IS
implemented in bank is integrated and working effectively, it should be
performing on 3 fundamental areas. If the persons working in bank are
satisfied on it then it is fulfilling the needs of bank. These three questions will
also lead us toward categorizing Key Performance Indicators of IS in bank.
The questions are:
1. Whether the IS is technologically integrated?
(It means that whether technologically, the IS implemented in bank is
properly embedded in working of bank and meeting its all requirement of data
based transactions like size, speed, security and service.)
2. Whether the IS is functionally integrated?
(It means that whether the IS implemented in bank improves the
functionality of bank.)
3. Whether the IS is strategically integrated?
(It means that whether implementation of IS give strategic advantage to
bank anyway.)
If the Information System applied in the bank is meeting these three
specifications broadly, then it is effective for bank. For meeting these
specifications the KPIs identified above should be mapped into these three
categories of Technical, Functional and Strategic integration, and form the
basis on which the researcher can evaluate the effectiveness of Information
System in bank in post implementation scenario.
4. Key Performance Indicators
92
On the basis of literature review and discussion with academia and experts of
this domain, the categorization or classification of KPIs identified is mentioned
below:
Table 15 : Factors or KPIs as per contribution to broad category
S.No Category / Classification Key Performance Indicator(s)
1 Strategic Integration • Long Term Planning
• Resource Utilization
• Flexibility for Data Handling
• Cost Control Management
• Customer Satisfaction Level
2 Functional Integration • Transactional Effectiveness
• Data Management
• Flow of Information
• System Efficiency
3 Technical Integration • Data Integrity & Network Security
• E-Documentation
• Backup Policy
On the basis of above categorization a model had been proposed to evaluate
the performance of Information System in bank. The proposed model had
been explained in next chapter.
This chapter discusses that initially 71 parameters have been listed for
measuring the performance of Information System in post implementation
4. Key Performance Indicators
93
scenario in banking industry. Further it has been shown that through the pilot
survey and after doing necessary mergers, number of parameters has been
reduced to 40. After completion of main survey, factor analysis was applied. It
was found that there were 12 factors that could act as Key Performance
Indicators for evaluation of Information System in banking sector. These
factors were further classified in to 3 categories of Strategic Integration,
Functional Integration and Technical Integration.