Chapter 5 of Ngqura/Final... · Chapter 5 : Issues, Comments and Responses Trail Final Scoping...

P r o p o s e d e x t e n s i o n t o t h e c o n t a i n e r b e r t h a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n a d m i n i s t r a t i o n c r a f t b a s i n a t t h e P o r t o f N g q u r a

Chapter 5 : Issues, Comments and Responses Trail

F i n a l S c o p i n g R e p o r t – C S I R , A p r i l 2 0 0 7

Chapter 5:

Issues, Comments and Responses Trail

P a g e i




P a g e ii

Issues, Comments and Responses Trail

5. ISSUES, COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TRAIL ___________ 5-1

5.1 Introduction _________________________________________________________5-1

5.2 Issues and responses _________________________________________________5-1 5.2.1 Issues related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil ____________________ 5-3 5.2.2 Socio-economic issues ________________________________________________ 5-6 5.2.3 EIA and public participation process ______________________________________ 5-8 5.2.4 Project planning, design and implementation _______________________________ 5-9

5.3 Specific issues to be addressed in specialist studies ________________________5-12 5.3.1 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on marine ecology, sediment toxicology and

dredging __________________________________________________________ 5-12 5.3.2 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on traffic and transportation ___________ 5-12 5.3.3 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on socio-economic impacts ___________ 5-13

5.4 Comments and Responses on the Draft Scoping Report _____________________5-13 5.4.1 Issues related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil ___________________ 5-14 5.4.2 Socio Economic Issues _______________________________________________ 5-20 5.4.3 Issues Related to the Traffic Impact Assessment ___________________________ 5-24 5.4.4 EIA and Public Participation ___________________________________________ 5-25 5.4.5 Project Planning, Design and Implementation______________________________ 5-26

Box 5.1: Approach to identifying key issues........................................................................................ 5-2




P a g e 5-1

5. ISSUES, COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TRAIL

5.1 Introduction

This chapter consists of three sections:

Identification of issues at the outset of the scoping process (i.e. before the release of the Draft Scoping Report), in order to set the scope for this EIA process, and associated responses from the EIA team and the project proponent (Section 5.2);

Scope of issues to be addressed in the specialist studies undertaken as part of this scoping process (Section 5.3), based on the identification of key issues;

Comments raised by I&APs in response to the release and communication of the findings of the Draft Scoping Report (which included the findings of the specialist studies), and associated responses from the EIA team and the project proponent (Section 5.4).

5.2 Issues and responses

A primary objective of Scoping is to review all issues raised and to identify those issues that need to be included within the scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment process. This section presents all environmental issues associated with the proposed project that have been raised through consultation with I&APs undertaken prior to the release of the Draft Scoping Report; and identifies those that are considered key issues requiring more detailed investigation and assessment. To appreciate the context in which these issues have been raised, the reader is referred to Appendices D and F which provide notes from meetings and correspondence received from stakeholders. Responses to issues have been provided by the CSIR team and the project proponents (Transnet). The issues raised by I&APs have been grouped as follows (number of issues raised is shown in brackets):

Issues related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil (14 issues) Socio-economic issues (15 issues) EIA and public participation process (6 issues) Project planning, design and implementation (12 issues).

Based on the issues raised through Scoping (Section 5.2), as well as inputs from the authorities, the EIA team and the project proponent, a summary of the key issues that require further investigation and assessment are provided in Section 5.3. These issues formed the basis for setting the scope of work for the three Specialist Studies undertaken as part of this EIA process.




P a g e 5-2

Box 5.1 Approach to identifying key issues

To guide this process of reviewing issues and identifying the key issues, the following questions are asked:

1. Whether or not the issue raised falls within the scope and responsibility of this EIA process for the additional activities being proposed at the Port of Ngqura by Transnet. If the issue is outside the scope of this EIA process, it is not considered further, with clear justification provided for this decision.

2. Whether or not sufficient information is available to respond to the issue or concern raised without further specialist investigation.

If sufficient information is already available, then the issue can be responded to directly

in the scoping meetings and reporting, without the need for further specialist investigations.

If sufficient information is not readily available, then further technical and/or specialist inputs are required to source relevant information in order to be able to address this issue as part of the EIA process. In the case of this EIA process, this review led to three additional specialist studies being required, these being the studies on Marine ecology, sediment toxicology and dredging (Chapter 6), Traffic and transportation (Chapter 7), and Socio-economic impacts (Chapter 8). The marine study draws on the Sediment Analysis and Assessment Data Report undertaken as part of this EIA process in order to source current baseline information (Appendix G).

Furthermore, the following principles are applied when identifying key issues and conducting the subsequent environmental impact assessment:

Focus on the key issues and associated impacts.

Maximise the use of existing information.

Adopt an impacts-driven approach that seeks to understand the impact pathways and ultimate receptors of impacts (e.g. instead of only focusing on the impact of dredge spoil disposal on, for example, the water column, to try to extrapolate the potential effect on marine species and ultimately on resource users such as the fishing industry).




P a g e 5-3

5.2.1 Issues related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil

NO. ISSUES RAISED DATE COMMENTATOR RESPONSE

1 My main concern is the effect of turbidity from the disposal material on the clarity of water. This will impact on the squid fishery since squid use visual communication in their spawning behaviour. The Marine ecology specialist study should include a component measuring levels of turbidity, spread of turbidity in the bay, and duration of turbidity levels. I do not know if that was done for the original study? Changes in the size distribution of squid in Algoa Bay have been noted, with squid maturing at much smaller sizes. This has not been related to Coega directly, but is of concern.

Email, 13 Nov 2006

Dr Ane Oosthuizen, SANParks

Addressed as part of the Marine ecology study (Chapter 6) – Please refer section 6.3.2.2 for details on turbidity effects in the bay. Potential impacts on squid spawning (section 6.4.2.2.2) and on the effects of turbidity on squid (section 6.4.2.2.3) are also investigated.

2 Dredging and land excavation to create an area for the container terminal and haulage of the dredge material is likely to cause dust pollution i) would you furnish the Assistant Manager (Mr Titima, Air Pollution and Noise Control) with proposed measures to abate dust nuisance which may effect surrounding industrial and residential areas. ii) It would be appreciated if a copy of recent air quality monitoring results including dust monitoring could be forwarded to the above.

Emailed, 27 Oct 2006

Mr Nodwela, NMBM Environmental Health

The NMMM is included as an I&AP and will be sent all relevant information pertaining to this environmental assessment. Mr Titima has been added to the I&AP register.

3 Was a survey conducted at the offshore disposal site after the original port construction to determine the effects of the dumping?

Faxed, 23 Oct 2006

Capt A Kampfer, SA Navy Hydrographic Office

Yes surveys were conducted at the disposal site after dredging and results are included in the annual monitoring reports produced for NPA. References include Klages et al, 2006, Klages and Bornman, 2005 and Klages and Bornman 2003.

4 When you start digging for the two berths will the water not flow into the dry areas and how will this impact on the dredging of the existing rock wall.

9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting No. The construction of the two berths in the dry includes putting in place a clay barrier which prevents water within the port from flowing into the area of construction (\refer to section 2.1.1. for further details).

5 The additional dredging & disposal will require a permit. 9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting Yes it will. A process of obtaining a permit has already been initiated by Transnet with DEAT MCM.

6 Has an alternative disposal site for dredge material been 9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting Yes an alternative disposal site in deeper water was




P a g e 5-4


investigated? Need to include this in the EIA as per London protocol. Also need to look at the cumulative effect and not just volume as from the first two berths.

investigated (in the original EIA, CES 2001). The potential use of this alternative site was reviewed as part the current EIA process with the conclusion reached that the existing site is environmentally more suitable (Refer to section 2.2.3)

7 What alternative sites are being assessed for the disposal of the dredge spoil? It is understood that no alternative sites are being assessed?

Pub Mtg, 25 Oct 2006

Johan Brink, Coega Development Corporation

See response above

8 Where will the material that will be taken out from the dry area be disposed of? Will trucks be used?

9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting The material as excavated in the dry for the construction of the quay wall will be used as back-filling behind the new quay walls, as well as the levelling off of the area behind the quay wall. It is unlikely that any of this material will be spoiled. The core and armour rock in the temporary bund (at the additional container terminals) will be utilised for the Coega river revetment.

9 There is a need to create a balance between the economics of disposal of the dredge spoil and negative environmental impacts.



Agreed. The use of the site in deeper water would add to the costs of dredging operations, nonetheless the existing site is considered preferable from an environmental perspective notwithstanding the economic imperatives. Refer to section 2.2.3 for more information.

10 The impact of the dredge spoil on the dynamics of the Sundays River mouth and the ecology of the Sundays River as a spawning ground for fish needs to be assessed? It is thought that the previous deposits of dredge spoil may have resulted in more frequent closure of the Sundays River mouth and a negative impact on fish stocks in the river. Should construction result in a negative affect on the Sundays River, what remedial action can be taken?


Chris Jordaan, Colchester

The construction of the Port of Ngqura has temporarily interrupted the natural movement in the surfzone, which has a net movement along the shoreline in an easterly direction. As a result, one can currently observe minor beach erosion immediately east of the eastern breakwater. However, the sand by-pass system, which is being commissioned early in 2007, will restore this natural sediment movement. Subsequently, the Port structure is not expected to result in any significant impact on the sediment movement along the shoreline in the vicinity of the Sundays River mouth. It needs to be




P a g e 5-5


borne in mind that river mouths are highly dynamic and affected by numerous factors, extending from wind and wave conditions through to catchment management.

11 Is there a possibility that, should the dredge spoil have resulted in the closure of the Sundays River Mouth, that the mouth can be dredged open?



Monitoring of the offshore dredge disposal site (refer to Figure 6.3 in Chapter 6) shows that the material deposited offshore has remained within the boundary of the disposal site. Bearing in mind that the Sundays River mouth is approximately 17km from the closest corner of the offshore disposal site, it is not expected that the dredge material reached the Sundays River mouth, influencing mouth closure.

12 It is understood that the sand bypass system at the Port is not yet in operation. When will it come into operation? What affect has the non operation of the sand bypass system had on the port basin and will further dredging of the basin be required as a result of this? What will be the impact on the Sundays River mouth as a result of the sand bypass system?


Chris Rhodes

Yes, the sand bypass is not currently operational. The net movement of sediment in the surf zone is eastwards and therefore the unavailability of the sand bypass system has resulted in a build-up of sand against the western breakwater and a slight erosion of the beach at the eastern breakwater. This situation is expected to be remedied when the sand-bypass comes into operation in early 2007.

13 Will the dredge spoil be deposited at the same off-shore site as previously used? What has been the affect on marine ecology from the dredge spoil previously deposited at this site?


Chris Rhodes

Yes. Marine ecology surveys were conducted at the disposal site after dredging and results are included in the annual monitoring reports produced for NPA. References include Klages et al, 2006, Klages and Bornman, 2005 and Klages and Bornman 2003. Also refer to section 6.3

14 What will be the impacts from dust on the Colchester community? Pub Mtg, 25 Oct 2006

Patrick Nodwele, NMBay Municipality

No dust impacts on Colchester as a direct result of the proposed developments is expected.




P a g e 5-6

5.2.2 Socio-economic issues


1 What will be the benefits to communities for the construction of the container terminal? How many jobs will be created by the project?

16 Nov 2006 Mlungisi Hina, Langa Meeting

Socio-Economic benefits are discussed in detail in Chapter 8. Approximately 840 - 960 jobs during construction (peak labour requirements) and in the order of 320 jobs will be available when the container terminal is fully operational.

2 Will there be any opportunities for SMME’s? 16 Nov 2006 Mlungisi Hina, Langa Meeting

Yes and actions to maximise use of SMME’s has been highlighted in Chapter 8.

3 Will there be a specific requirement for local people to be employed in the running and operation of the container terminal?

16 Nov 2006 Mlungisi Hina, Langa Meeting

Yes provided that people required for operation of the port are locally available. Measures to promote use of local labour are provided in section 8.5.1.

4 The port expansion will be supported by the number of jobs that are created. Will local people be employed or will people from outside the area be brought in to work on the project?

7 Nov 2006 WE Mandla, Motherwell Meeting

See comment above.1

5 What skills will be required for employment and will training be provided to ensure the employment of local people?

7 Nov 2006 WE Mandla, Motherwell Meeting

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to section 8.5.1

6 Unemployment levels in the area are high. Is there a training programme to facilitate the employment of local people?

7 Nov 2006 ME Stemele, Motherwell Meeting

It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to section 8.5.1

7 What opportunities will be created or SMME’s? 9 Nov 2006 Monwabisi Gans, SANCO Meeting

Actions to maximise use of SMME’s have been highlighted in Chapter 8.

8 How many jobs will be created by the project and will training be provided for local people to be employed during the operational phases for the container terminal?

7 Nov 2006 Belinda Gqozo, Zwide Meeting

Approximately 840 - 960 jobs during construction (peak labour requirements) and in the order of 320 jobs will be available when the container terminal is fully operational.

9 What opportunities will there be for SMME’s? Will attempts be made to involve them in the delivery of containers?

7 Nov 2006 Zanele Madyosi, Zwide Meeting

Actions to maximise use of SMME’s have been highlighted in Chapter 8.

10 How many jobs will be created by the project during construction and operational phases?

8 Nov 2006 Cllr Makoni, Kwazakele & New Brighton Meeting

Approximately 840 - 960 jobs during construction (peak labour requirements) and in the order of 320 jobs will be available when the container terminal is fully operational




P a g e 5-7


11 Is there a specific requirement on the recruitment of local people to run the container terminal or will training be provided?

8 Nov 2006 Cllr Makoni, Kwazakele & New Brighton Meeting

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to section 8.5.1

12 What type of job opportunities would be available? 8 Nov 2006 Cllr Ranyele, Kwazakele & New Brighton Meeting

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. At this stage the specific job requirements have not been determined.

13 Will this project open opportunities for the local people or will existing personnel be used?

8 Nov 2006 Cllr Ranyele, Kwazakele & New Brighton Meeting

Both existing personnel and local people will have opportunities of being employed.

14 Will there be any opportunities for SMME’s in the transportation and delivery of containers?

8 Nov 2006 Khuselwa Faku, Kwazakele & New Brighton Meeting

Actions to maximise use of SMME’s have been highlighted in Chapter 8. Note that Transnet are not directly involved in road haulage of containers.

15 The development of a container terminal, and more specifically a hub port for east-west trade, has been mooted for about 10 years. There was a commercial initiative by P&O Nedlloyd/TCI in the late 1990’s but other priorities found favour. It is understood that the proposed container terminal will primarily service trade to and from Gauteng and a rail service will be provided to facilitate this. Eventually, the current container terminal in the Port of PE will be phased out and the implementation of the plans for holistic development of that port and the historic centre of the city can proceed. For the foreseeable future, volumes of container traffic which will be generated by the Metropolitan area and the Coega IDZ will not be sufficient to justify a major container terminal at Coega. Hence, the terminal needs to be considered in the light of servicing Gauteng, if that is cost effective, and preferably the hub port concept. The challenge with just servicing Gauteng is that rail slots are taken up by container trains and there is no capacity for bringing additional manganese ore for export and beneficiation,

Written comment, 6 Dec 2006

Andrea von Holdt, Coega Development Corporation

Comments noted. The challenges of balancing existing and future rail and port usage will have to be addressed by Transnet as part of their on-going planning and operational management.




P a g e 5-8


and volumes of chromite, iron ore, coal and fluxes also for beneficiation.

5.2.3 EIA and public participation process


1 As you are aware, iGas is involved (with Eskom) in a project to set up an LNG terminal and CCGT power plant adjacent to the proposed craft basin and we need to be kept informed of developments which may affect our plans.

Email, 19 Oct 2006

Dr Michael J Ellman, iGas

This I&AP was placed on the project database and provided with the Background Information Document on the project.

2 Why wasn’t the admin craft basin done in phase 1? 9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting At the time of conducting the overall Port EIA (CES 2001), it was proposed that service vessels would be accommodated within the harbour in PE. Recent development trends require that the service vessels are located with the Port of Ngqura.

3 Meetings like the one at the PE City Hall are also required in the areas like Motherwell. The City Hall is too far for people from these areas to travel and they need to be informed of the project and provided an opportunity to give their input into the project.



In order to ensure the participation from organizations in communities, one-on-one meetings are held with identified groups.

4 The specialist studies need to assess the potential impacts of the development on the islands.



Yes. The potential impacts on the islands have been investigated and the impacts are described in Chapter 6.

5 What is the outcome of previous marine monitoring studies during and after construction of the existing port structures; and will these results be taken into account in the assessment of impacts from this additional dredging and disposal?



A summary of the outcomes of recent Marine monitoring studies are provided in section 6.2., which provides a baseline on which future impacts can be assessed.

6 What infrastructure and services will be required by the Port and are these taken into account in the environmental impact assessment process?



An overview of the project description is provided in Chapter 2 and forms the basis for this EIA.




P a g e 5-9

5.2.4 Project planning, design and implementation


1 When will the project start? 7 Nov 2006 Mr ME Stemele, Motherwell Meeting

Construction due to start mid to latter part of 2007. Refer to Chapter 2 for details.

2 You have indicated that the Port will be open and operational in 2009. Does this mean fully operational and when in 2009 will it be opened?


Wendy Lester, PERCCI

Construction is planned to be completed by end 2009. Refer to Table 2.1 in Chapter 2.

3 Will the rocks be coming from Coega Kop Quarry? The haul road has been rehabilitated between Coega Kop Quarry and the port. Will Neptune road be used?

9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting No core or armour rock will be sourced from the Coega Kop quarry. The existing stockpile of overburden (i.e. left over rock, not large enough to be used as armour rock) at the Coega Kop quarry will be crushed and transported via Neptune Road for use as concrete aggregate within the port. The core and armour rock will be sourced from a commercial quarry.

4 The proposed container berth has temporary rock armour protection. Has it been investigated that the rock be used as a possible source? Do you plan on using the existing rock rather than source other rock?

9 Nov 2006 Coega ELC Meeting The armour rock in the temporary berm at the container berth will be used for the Coega River revetment. Refer to section 2.2.1

5 What area of the port is proposed to be paved? Pub Mtg, 25 Oct 2006


The area behind the container berth as shown in Figure 2.3 in Chapter 2

6 Will the paving consist of brick or concrete? Pub Mtg, 25 Oct 2006

Mark Marshall, NMBM Conservation

A concrete slab of 430 mm thickness will be used.

7 It is understood that the concept master plan for the Port of Ngura is under consideration by Transnet Projects, NPA, SAPO and Spoornet. That plan is currently not aligned with The IDZ’s Master Plan and, more importantly, does not address the requirements of potential investors in the IDZ.



Commented noted. Alignment of planning between Transnet and CDC is beyond the scope of this EIA.




P a g e 5-10


Further, there are likely to be requirements for rail mashalling yards in the IDZ and additional space for logistics operations. All such requirements need to be holistically planned as there are other imperatives in the IDZ.

8 It is understood that NPA is intending to provide infrastructure such as roads and storm water management within the port precinct. However, it is also understood that the NPA is requiring other bodies to provide and manage utility services to tenants/ concessionaires in the Port. Such tenants/ concessionaires include SAPO for the initial container terminal, Alcan for the aluminium receiving and out loading facilities and iGas for the LNG receiving facilities. NPA have advised that they will provide their own utility services distribution networks and hence integration of utility services provisions will be problematic and there may well be duplication.



In line with the promulgated Port Bill, it is the intention that the services to the various tenants not be provided by the NPA due to the inability to recover the costs associated with the maintenance thereof, particularly with respect to power supply. The preliminary design for the electrical reticulation makes provision for the separate metering of power to the tenants without impacting upon the reticulation or duplication thereof. This is covered in the original ROD and not an issue with regard to the current EIA process.

9 Once a properly integrated and aligned Master Plan for the Coega Project is available, a properly integrated and aligned infrastructure and utility services plan can be prepared. The implementation of that plan then needs to be considered from a legal, financial and commercial perspective. It is problematic to service tenants/ concessionaires cost-effectively unless the entity responsible for utility services provisions is party to all NPA’s engagements with such tenants/ concessionaires. A private entity may not prefer electrically powered Rail Mounted Gantries which are currently being considered by TP/ SAPO/ NPA for the first two container berths. The entity responsible for utility services provisions cannot be expected to subsidize Transnet’s operations.



It will not be practical to sub-divide the container terminal, therefore with SAPO operating the first two berths, it will also operate the additional two berths, noting that the rail terminal that is supported by the RMG must be constructed along the full length of the terminal in order to facilitate the size of trains, i.e. 50 wagons.

10 The mandate of the CDC is to ensure the integrated development and servicing of the Coega IDZ and the servicing of the Port of Ngqura is not specifically included. The CDC’s mandate will need to be extended before servicing of the port precinct can even be considered by the CDC.



This is a matter that needs to be taken by CDC and NPA and is outside of the scope of this EIA.




P a g e 5-11


11 The planning of the port precinct does not seem to have been done holistically to take account of possible adjacent developments. The draft Scoping Report for the CIP Project indicates a possible sea water cooling intake near the root of the eastern breakwater. Further, the LNG Berth, the cryogenic pipelines and the LNG storage facilities, and their concomitant infrastructure and utility services do no seem to have been integrated into the planning of the Administration Craft Basin.



The positioning of the administration craft basin was based on strong engineering grounds and the available realistic information at the time, with the Port of Ngqura Master Planning process running concurrently with the engineering study. The layout of the container terminal was incorporated into the Master Planning exercise to the extent that the work to be constructed would not be abortive.

12 The project is supported. 9 Nov 2006 Mike Bonya, SANCO Meeting

Noted.




P a g e 5-12

5.3 Specific issues to be addressed in specialist studies

This section provides a summary of the key issues that require further investigation and assessment. These issues formed the basis for setting the scope of work for the three Specialist Studies undertaken as part of this EIA process. 5.3.1 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on marine ecology, sediment

toxicology and dredging

The study will include the following: Identify the type and location of habitats and important species/taxa that may be sensitive

to, or disturbed by, the proposed activities. Identify the specific stress agents associated with the proposed developments, the

marine ecological receptors of the disturbance(s). Assess the impacts of the proposed development on the marine biota (including benthic

fauna and flora, marine mammals and seabirds) of Algoa Bay through, e.g. turbidity, re-suspension of contaminants in dredge spoil and inundation.

Assess the potential impact on mariculture and squid fisheries. Provide an update on the environmental baseline at the off-shore disposal site using

recent monitoring reports. 5.3.2 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on traffic and transportation

During Construction:

The disposal of spoil material to locations to be advised via road based transport. The identification of sources for, and the transportation of construction materials from

source to the port. Transport of these materials on the existing road network if required. Assessment of ability of existing Coega Kop haul road to accommodate additional

material transportation if required. Possible transport of ship-to-shore container cranes and container handling equipment

via road (abnormal loads) including identification of routes for this purpose. Construction worker transport requirements.

During Operations:

Transport of containers via road to various points. Trip generation of admin basin activities and impact on road network.




P a g e 5-13

5.3.3 Issues addressed in the Specialist Study on socio-economic impacts

Employment opportunities during construction and operation. Investigating opportunities for SMME’s, local labour, training and skills development. Effects on users of coastal waters (eg. fisherman, recreational sports and marine traffic). Effects on marine and coastal ecotourism.

5.4 Comments and Responses on the Draft Scoping Report

This EIA process has been designed and conducted in a manner intended to provide sufficient information to enable the authorities to reach a Record of Decision at the end of the Scoping phase. The Draft Scoping Report therefore included the results of specialist studies and an assessment of predicted impacts. The Draft Scoping Report was released on the 5 February 2007 for a 30 day review period. The Comments and Responses Trail below contains the comments received from interested and affected parties during the review period. To appreciate the context in which these comments have been made, the reader is referred to Appendices D and F which provide notes from meetings and correspondence received from stakeholders. Responses to issues have been provided by the CSIR team and the project proponents (Transnet). The comments received from I&APs have been grouped as follows (number of issues raised is shown in brackets):

Issues related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil (27 issues) Socio-economic issues (25 issues) Traffic and transportation issues (5 issues) EIA and public participation process (6 issues) Project planning, design and implementation (20 issues).




P a g e 5-14

5.4.1 Comments related to dredging and the disposal of dredge spoil

NO. COMMENTS RAISED DATE COMMENTATOR RESPONSE

1 Our suspicion is that the increased sediment load from dredging for the first phase of the Ngqura harbour has led to the silting up of the Sundays River Mouth. Will additional dredging not exacerbate the problem? Is it possible that the dredger used for dredging the harbour be used to open the Sundays River Mouth?

Pub Mtg 15 Feb 2007

Chris Jordaan The construction of the Port of Ngqura has temporarily interrupted the natural movement of sediment in the surfzone, which has a net movement along the shoreline in an easterly direction. As a result, one can currently observe minor beach erosion immediately east of the eastern breakwater. However, the sand by-pass system, which is being commissioned early in 2007, will restore this natural sediment movement. Subsequently, the Port structure is not expected to result in any significant impact on the sediment movement along the shoreline in the vicinity of the Sundays River mouth. It needs to be borne in mind that river mouths are highly dynamic and affected by numerous factors, extending from wind and wave conditions through to catchment management.

2 If dredging vessel traffic will impact on the PE Port traffic, will it not similarly impact on Ngqura Port traffic?

Coega ELC Mtg 6 Feb

2007

Andries Struwig

The Ngqura port traffic will receive priority with regards to the dredging operations; and all dredging movements within the port and to the disposal site will be carefully managed with the port harbour master. The anticipated port traffic conditions will be included in the tender documentation in order to ensure that the tenderers comprehend the impact of the operational port.

3 What is the best estimate for the time period during which dredging will take place? Whales come close inshore during August to October. What are the potential impacts of dredging on these animals? Will the dredging time period coincide with increased whale abundance in the Bay?

Coega ELC Mtg, 6 Feb

2007

Paul Martin It is estimated that dredging may take approximately 4 to 5 months for each activity, i.e. the administration craft basin and quay wall extension, excluding the mobilisation of dredgers to the site. The type of dredgers used for the operations will be different, as will be the timing of the operations, and they will therefore be procured separately. Internationally, suitable dredgers are currently in short supply and when Transnet procures such dredgers they




P a g e 5-15


may not have the opportunity to stipulate a limited time period for when they will need the dredger. Therefore, at this stage it is not possible to indicate when they will be available. Also refer to the response to Question 25 on the potential impact of dredge disposal on Southern Right whales.

4 A beach replenishment program is planned North End beach for 2009 – 2010. Can the dredge spoil from the container berth not be used in this area rather than being dumped out at sea?


2007

Paul Martin, Nelson Mandela Municipality, Environmental Services Business Unit

This will need to form part of separate EIA study to determine if this is an acceptable solution, taking into consideration environmental, technical and financial criteria. Beach nourishment requires a particular grade of sediment (coarse sandy material). Cores taken by Transnet indicate that a significant portion of the material to be removed by the proposed dredging at Ngqura is siltstone, sandstone and sandy silt, which is not necessarily suitable for beach nourishment. Bearing in mind the above constraints, it is recommended that Transnet and NMMM’s Environmental Services Business Unit remain in communication regarding the potential opportunities for such use of material in a manner that doesn’t compromise either project.

5 At the time that dredging takes place additional disposal opportunities may become available. These opportunities should be considered at such time.


2007

Leon Els Comment noted and brought to the attention of Transnet.

6 Could some of the dredge material not be used elsewhere in construction activities?


2007

Feroza Albertus-Stanley

The basic port infrastructure and necessary land reclamation would have already been completed during the original port and 1st phase of the container terminal completion, therefore the requirement for additional fill material at this advanced stage of the project is unlikely.

7 It appears that the construction of the port it will not impact on the Swartkops River.

Net Mtg 28 Feb 2007

Alan Withers Swartkops Trust

Noted with thanks.




P a g e 5-16


8 Has an assessment been done on the impacts associated with the disposal of the dredge spoil from phase one of the port construction?

Net Mtg 28 Feb 2007


Yes, surveys were conducted at the disposal site after dredging and results are included in the annual monitoring reports produced for NPA. References include Klages et al, 2006, Klages and Bornman, 2005 and Klages and Bornman 2003.

9 Have any post contractual surveys been done on the impacts on the Sundays River taking into account that the public have noted changes in the Sundays River Mouth?

Net Mtg 28 Feb 2007


The construction of the Port of Ngqura has temporarily interrupted the natural movement in the surfzone, which has a net movement along the shoreline in an easterly direction. As a result, one can currently observe minor beach erosion immediately east of the eastern breakwater. However, the sand by-pass system, which is being commissioned early in 2007, will restore this natural sediment movement. Subsequently, the Port structure is not expected to result in any significant impact on the sediment movement along the shoreline in the vicinity of the Sundays River mouth. It needs to be borne in mind that river mouths are highly dynamic and affected by numerous factors, extending from wind and wave conditions through to catchment management.

10 What is the impact on the Sundays River Mouth considering that the sandy bypass system is currently not operating?

Net Mtg 28 Feb 2007


See response to comment #9 above

11 What are the levels of arsenic in the dredge spoil and will this impact on the marine environment?

Net Mtg, 7 Feb 2007

Ane Oosthuizen, SANParks

Sampling of Arsenic (As) was included in the CSIR sediment analysis (Appendix G), which informed the marine specialist study (Chapter 6 of FSR). This sampling found that, for 42 samples within the port area, all were well below the London Convention Special Care Level of 30-150 mg/kg except one deep vibro-core sample from a depth of 21.5 to 23.0 m (Section 6.3.2.1 of FSR). Taking into account mixing of sediments during dredging, the probability of deleterious effects on biota appears remote and therefore the potential impact is assessed to be low (Section 6.4.2.1.4. of FSR).




P a g e 5-17


12 The preferred mitigatory measure to limit negative impacts on the penguins would be to limit dredging to the period when they are moulting.

Net Mtg, 7 Feb 2007


Yes. This period is when the penguins are not dependent on the islands for feeding and would be the ideal time to conduct the dredge operations.

13 When you say impact on marine life, oyster beds specifically are not mentioned, how will the construction process impact on oyster beds and oysters washing up on shore? Has the assessment specifically taken into account the potential negative impacts on oysters and oyster beds? We have a license to collect oysters and mussels on this stretch of coast and would like to know the potential negative impacts on oyster beds in this area as a result of the disposal of the dredge spoil.

Tel Consultation 12 Feb 2007

Kate Crews

It is likely that the oyster species being referred to is Striostrea margaritacea. This is a common species and occurs mainly on rock surfaces from low water springs to ~5m depth (Branch et al 1994). Oysters, and bivalves in general, appear to be able to withstand high turbidity as suspended sediment (sub-lethal effects may be generated at 100 mg/l suspended sediment concentrations and above whilst lethal effects appear to occur after prolonged exposure (3 weeks) to concentrations > 10 000mg/l (Clarke and Wilber 2000). The restricted depth range of S. margaritacea indicate that it is unlikely to be affected by dumped dredge spoil (offshore dump site) as suspended sediment concentrations >100mg/l are expected to be restricted to the immediate vicinity of the dredge spoil dump site. Monitoring of suspended sediment concentrations in the dredge area during the initial dredging phase indicated maximum suspended sediment concentrations of ~50mg/l. Therefore it is considered unlikely that there will be suspended sediment effects on either oysters or mussels during the proposed dredging.

14 With the first phase of the construction process we noted a dramatic difference in the shore line, especially sanding up of the beaches. When will the sand bypass system be put into action, what will be the impact of this on oyster beds.

Tel Consultation, 12 Feb 2007

Kate Crews The net movement of sediment in the surf zone is eastwards and therefore the unavailability of the sand bypass system over the past year resulted in a build-up of sand against the western breakwater and a slight erosion of the beach at the eastern breakwater. This situation is expected to be remedied when the sand-bypass comes into operation in early 2007.




P a g e 5-18


15 It is ideal that the existing dredge disposal site is used and disposal is done during the moulting season.

Net Mtg, 12 Feb 2007

Morgan Griffiths, Wildlife & Environment Society of SA

Comment noted. This is a key management action emerging from the Scoping Study.

16 Can the dredge spoil not be used to replenish the beach on the eastern breakwater, which is quite eroded?



The replenishment of the eastern beach will take place progressively as the sand bypass system becomes operational in early 2007. It will be important to remove extra material that has built up along the western breakwater due to the sand bypass not being operational, in order to facilitate the optimal operation of the jet pumping.

17 How many dredgers will be used for dredging? It is recommended that the dredge spoil is disposed of on the up-current end of the disposal site, not off the site, in keeping with the natural long shore drift of the area.



It is envisaged that two separate dredgers will be used for the purposes of dredging the quays and the administration craft basin. The aim, when disposing of material at the offshore site, will be to keep spoil within the designated site boundary and to fill the existing “hollows” in order to maintain an even bottom topography, as best as possible.

18 Will the dredge spoil not impact on the marine environment?

Despatch Alliance, Net Mtg, 12 Feb

2007

Ronnie Sampson

The impacts associated with the disposal of dredge spoil are covered in detail in Chapter 6 of this report (Marine Ecology Specialist Report). All potential impacts on the Marine environment have been assessed and where applicable mitigation has been proposed to minimize negative impacts.

19 Will the dredging not impact on the marine environment? Are there any specific marine species that would be negatively affected during dredging?

Kwa Nobuhle Alliance, Net Mtg, 13 Feb

2007

Bukelwa Stuurman

See comment above.

20 What will be the impacts on the marine environment from the project?

Kwa Langa Alliance, Net Mtg, 12 Feb

2007

Mziyanda Mooi

See comment above




P a g e 5-19


21 What was the impact on the penguins and the abalone farm from the phase one construction process and the disposal of the dredge spoil? The project must take into account previous experience to minimize negative impacts.

Motherwell Alliance, Net Mtg, 14 Feb

2007

Nomthunzi Rula See comment above

22 Will the dredge spoil impact on air quality in the area? Motherwell Alliance, Net Mtg, 14 Feb

2007

Stella Ntongana

No. There are no air quality related issues of concern with the disposal of the dredge spoil. See Chapter 6 on potential impacts of disposal of dredge spoil for other potential impacts.

23 What will be the impact on the marine environment during dredging?


2007

Nomabhele September

The impacts associated with the disposal of dredge spoil are covered in detail in Chapter 6 of this report (Marine Ecology Specialist Report). All potential impacts on the Marine environment have been assessed and where applicable mitigation has been proposed to minimize negative impacts.

24 Is the decline of Penguins an international concern or local and is it not caused by the developments that are happening in the area? The development must take into account the impact on penguins. Penguins are a natural beauty of this area that must be protected.

SANCO Metro Region, Net Mtg, 22 Feb

2007

Eric Kakana

This concern is addressed as part of the Marine ecology study (Chapter 6), which recognises the decline of the African Penguin as being an issue of international significance.

25 Impact on Southern Right Whales in the bay Aug-Oct has not been identified as a potential impact (the area off Coega / Bluewater Bay is the best area for them). In 2006 few whales visited the bay, though there were more than usual on the South Coast (Schoenmakerskop, etc). I can only assume that increased turbidity / freshwater after the 4 Aug flood could have been the cause of this. Is there any information available on the impact of turbidity on SR Whales? This impact could be wholly mitigated by avoiding the period 1 Aug - mid-Oct for dredging.

Email, 6 Feb 2007

Dr Paul Martin, Business Unit Manager: Environmental Services, Nelson Mandela Municipality

There does not appear to be any observational literature on the effects of turbidity on southern right whales. It may be that they will avoid turbid water but unsystematic observations of these whales in Walker Bay (Hermanus) indicate that they do not actively avoid turbid water flowing out of the Klein River mouth or wave generated turbid water in other regions of the bay.

26 North End beach re-nourishment project may be in place by 2009/2010 when the dredging is proposed. Dropping of suitable material just North of the existing PE harbour could

Email, 6 Feb 2007

Dr Paul Martin, Business Unit Manager:

Refer to response to Comment #4 above. It also needs to be borne in mind that the increased distance to the North End beach will impact significantly on the cost of the




P a g e 5-20


assist rapid re-nourishment once the proposed offshore reefs / groynes are in place. The impacts associated with dumping dredge material for this project would be subject to a separate EIA & need not be included in your report. However, a comment on the suitability of the fill as beach nourishment material would be appropriate.

Environmental Services Nelson Mandela Municipality

dredging material disposal.

27 My concern is that when dredging starts the loose sand will drift downstream and possibly add to filling and blocking of the Sundays River Mouth which is very close to the project and already choking currently and blocking access to fish in and out of the river as well as boats.

Written Comment


Monitoring of the offshore dredge disposal site (refer to Figure 6.3 in Chapter 6) shows that the material deposited offshore has remained within the boundary of the disposal site. Bearing in mind that the Sundays River mouth is approximately 17km from the closest corner of the offshore disposal site, it is not expected that the dredge material reached the Sundays River mouth, influencing mouth closure.

5.4.2 Socio-Economic Comments


1 The involvement of SMME’S for the construction process must be built into the construction contracts of the successful bidders.


2007

Ronnie Sampson

Agreed and actions to maximise use of SMME’s has been highlighted in Chapter 8.

2 During the employment process there is a need to spread employment opportunities to include people from Despatch as they are also part of the database.


2007

Siyabulela Rawula

Actions to maximise use of local labour have been highlighted in Chapter 8. Transnet will aim to maximise employment opportunities through the use of the CDC labour services.




P a g e 5-21


3 The project is supported as it will ensure the participation of SMME’s.


2007

Cllr Bomvana

Noted with thanks.

4 In order to mitigate the impact of HIV/AIDS, training of institutions in this field to educate workers should be considered.


2007

Cllr Bomvana

Actions to minimise impacts of HIV/AIDS are covered in Chapter 8. Measures such as providing training are incorporated in the specialist study.

5 Is there a breakdown of how many disabled will be employed by the project? Is there a process in place to enforce laws to ensure that disabled people are employed?


2007

Themba Ndandani

No. All local labour is employed in accordance with the zone labour agreement by the contractors, with the assistance of the CDC.

6 Is there a specific age group that would be employed on the project?


2007

Themba Ndandani All local labour is employed in accordance with the zone labour agreement by the contractors, with the assistance of the CDC.

7 Job opportunities must be spread throughout the Metro to ensure everyone has the opportunity to get employment.


2007

Nomsa Booi

Actions to maximise use of local labour are covered in Chapter 8 (Socio-Economic Specialist Study).

8 During employment there is a need to focus on young people and to utilize the Councilors’ offices to create awareness around the employment database.


2007

Fungile Kume

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to Section 8.5 of FSR.

9 The utilization of the database is correct but there is a need to monitor the fair distribution of employment opportunities on the project especially in the Motherwell area.

ANC Regional

Alliance, Net Mtg 20 Feb

2007

Vuyo Toto

All local labour is employed in accordance with the zone labour agreement by the contractors, with the assistance of the CDC.




P a g e 5-22


10 Will training be based on the needs of the project or will it be done for all people registered on the database? Training must be linked with learnerships for people to gain experience.

ANC Regional


2007

Vuyo Toto

It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to Section 8.5.1 of FSR.

11 On what basis have the 960 jobs been calculated, is this cumulative or will 960 people be employed from start to finish of the construction process?


2007

Z Stock

960 jobs is the maximum construction employment figure (for a 4 month peak period). Approximately 1,5 million man-hours of work opportunity will be created during the construction period.

12 The utilization of the employment database is supported but there is a need to update the database to ensure people are still interested and want to be kept informed of training opportunities.


2007

Mziyanda Mooi

Comment noted.

13 The database used by CDC for employment should use local or Ward councillors during recruitment of individuals in Motherwell. Information sharing must take place on the recruitment process. The current contractors on site are making use of their own personnel and the Motherwell community must be involved in all the activities.


2007

Tony Nonkonyana All local labour is employed in accordance with the zone labour agreement by the contractors, with the assistance of the CDC.

14 What skills will be needed by employees for this project? There is a need for skills training and the transfer of skills to individuals in the community. SMME’s should be used for this.


2007

Sandile Twani

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment. Refer to Section 8.5.1 of FSR.

15 A mobile or a permanent clinic should be in place at the construction village as part HIV/AIDS management.


2007

Nomthunzi Rula The CDC has a clinic at their recruitment centre in the IDZ. This is a free service (provided by CDC) to people employed in the IDZ, whether employed by the CDC or through contract work in the IDZ/for the CDC. It is not available to the general public. Motherwell has a clinic for the general public. CDC does not have plans to construct a clinic in the Coega Village.




P a g e 5-23


16 There is a need to involve SMME contractors from the Uitenhage area in the project. They should be allocated a share of the development.


2007

T Ngaphi

Agreed. Actions to maximise use of SMME’s have been highlighted in Chapter 8.

17 Will employment guidelines take into account people that are between pensionable age and the youth?


2007

Mgcini Mejane

A broad breakdown of skills required is provided in Table 8.1. It is recommended that training be provided to promote local employment regardless of age. Refer to Section 8.5.1.

18 What mechanism will be used to ensure that people from Kwa Langa also benefit from the project and employment?


2007

Z Stock

All local labour is employed in accordance with the zone labour agreement by the contractors, with the assistance of the CDC.

19 The process for training must be communicated to individuals on the database.


2007

Stella Ntongana

Agreed and it is envisaged that CDC will perform this function.

20 Training of individuals must take into account the needs of potential tenants before it is implemented. All trainees must be placed after training is complete.


2007

Zoleka Mxoli

The nature of the project is focussed on large civil and marine structures and training will be largely focussed on the civil engineering industry, which does for form part of the future port operations.

21 There must be a clear monitoring programme for training and employment of individuals both during and post construction.


2007

Nomonde Tokota

During construction phase the CDC labour and business management services are responsible for the training and development of the contractor’s local labour as well as monitoring and control of all local labour opportunities on the project through the LBMS. For post construction, Transnet allocates a percentage of labour cost to training annually and each employee has a personal development and training plan that is reviewed annually




P a g e 5-24


22 Skills training must be linked up with JIPSA (Joint Initiative on Priority Skills) in order to ensure that people are absorbed by the market on completion of the project.

SANCO Metro

Region, Net Mtg, 22 Feb

2007

Cllr Monde Mtanga

The construction phase skills development is done through the CDC recruitment facility. CDC performs labour preparation pre-placement. At project demobilisation the effected local labour will return to the Coega labour pool for placement on further projects.

23 When the project starts it must consider black construction companies first, it should assist them with training so they know what is happening.

Written comment

Monwabisi Gans Actions to maximise use of SMME’s have been highlighted in Chapter 8.

24 The Coega project is closest to Motherwell and as such the labour force should be coming from Motherwell, this is not happening.

Written Comment

Tony Nonkonyana Siyalanda Cleaning Enterprise

Noted. Chapter 8 includes recommendations for using local labour, with emphasis on utilising neighbouring areas (such as Motherwell). Contractors will employ local labour in accordance with the zone labour agreement and with the assistance of CDC.

25 Crime is bred by poverty and if we are to alleviate crime projects like Coega should be extensively labour intensive, e.g. machinery can be imported and assembled locally. The project should breed spin offs in other businesses like, laundries, cafeterias, dye and screw makers.

Written Comment

Tony Nonkonyana Siyalanda Cleaning Enterprise

The size and specialist nature of the concrete and marine construction as included in the scope limits the opportunity of labour intensive construction with respect to the quay wall and administration craft basin construction.

5.4.3 Comments Related to the Traffic Impact Assessment


1 To what extent did the traffic impact assessment consider the levels of service that the current transport infrastructure can deliver to business centres in the interior of SA (e.g. Gauteng)?

Pub Mtg, 15 Feb 2007

Tom Kelly

The traffic impact assessment was focussed on the immediate infrastructure, whilst the rail infrastructure to Gauteng was studied during the feasibility study.

2 What measures will Transnet put in place to ensure that overloading and unsafe transport practices are prevented?


Tom Kelly

The responsibility with respect to overloading and unsafe road transportation be outside the scope of Transnet and remain the responsibility of the local road authorities.




P a g e 5-25


3 Will the port of Ngqura be able to handle the receiving and offloading of abnormal loads (e.g. cranes)?


Tom Kelly

The container terminal expansion that forms the basis of the EIA will utilise the existing infrastructure as constructed under the original port of Ngqura RoD. The port infrastructure is focussed on dry and liquid bulk and container traffic.

4 How much of the container traffic will be transported by road, and how much by rail?


Tom Kelly

The estimated traffic volumes are contained in the Traffic Impact Study (Chapter 7). Please refer to Table 7.2 for estimates of road traffic conveying containers. Rail traffic is fixed at approximately 300 000 TEU per annum.

5 There is a need to make provision for the above harbour to accommodate abnormal traffic. We should be looking to be able to accommodate loads in and out of at least 6 meter wide and 6 meter high, and 150 ton capacity. Will a route out exist with the currant bridge network, or will an abnormal access route need to be provided?

Email comment, 12

Feb 2007

Johan Gustafson, Material Handling Consultant

The container terminal expansion that forms the basis of the EIA will utilise the existing infrastructure as constructed under the original port of Ngqura RoD. The port infrastructure is focussed on dry and liquid bulk and container traffic.

5.4.4 EIA and Public Participation


1 In the next round of the process there is a need to translate the summary document into Afrikaans as there are Afrikaans speaking people in the area.


2007

Cllr Greef

The documentation for the EIA process is produced predominantly in English. Translation into Afrikaans in future will be considered.

2 The presentation you have given is most welcome. The report must be placed in all Kwa Nobuhle libraries as well.


2007

Cllr Bomvana

A copy of the Final Scoping Report will be placed in a Library in Kwa Nobuhle.




P a g e 5-26


3 We welcome the presentation; the ANC will discuss the project and make a submission.

ANC Regional


2007

Vuyo Toto

This comment is noted, but no submission was received.

4 We welcome the presentation, the COSATU affiliates will be given the information and a comprehensive submission will be made.

COSATU Uitenhage, Net Mtg, 13 Feb 2007

Thembinkosi Stemele

This comment is noted but not submission was received.

5 Why did the previous studies not anticipate the need to expand the port and the impacts on the marine environment?


2007

Simon April

Future port expansions were considered from the outset, but are being required sooner than expected due the rate of growth in container transportation, both internationally and nationally, exceeding previous predictions.

6 Please keep up the good work you are doing and organize more workshops in order to create more awareness about environmental impact processes.

Written Comment

Monde Mtanga, SANCO Regional Executive

We thank you for your comment. One on one meetings and focus group meetings will continue to play a key role in the sharing of information and the development of the capacity of I&APs around Environmental Impact Assessment processes.

5.4.5 Project Planning, Design and Implementation


1 Will the railway line be a double or a single line and where will it be located?


Mike Clarke The railway line as included in the original port construction RoD is focussed specifically with respect to the construction of the marshalling yard at Coega Station and connection to the container terminal. The connecting rail line is a single line.




P a g e 5-27


2 Is there a possibility of extending the current railway line between PE and Alexandria (passing through Colchester) in order to deliver goods to, for example, Grahamstown?


Chris Jordaan

The railway line as included in the original port construction RoD is focussed specifically with respect to the construction of the marshalling yard at Coega Station and connection to the container terminal.

3 How will Transnet ensure that rail transport delivers freight to centers in the interior of SA (e.g. Gauteng) fast enough to be economically competitive with road transport?


Tom Kelly

The rail transportation of the containers will be undertaken as part of a ring fenced operation within Spoornet through utilising dedicated locomotives and wagons for the Ngqura container terminal specifically. The feasibility study has focussed on minimising the turnaround times of the trains from Ngqura to City Deep.

4 How different are the approach channel positions for the two ports?

Coega ELC Mtg, 6 Feb 2007

Andries Struwig The approach channels to the Ports of Ngqura and PE are different, taking into account the design wave and wind directions. There is a single approach channel to the additional two container berths.

5 How is Transnet going to monitor the introduction of alien organisms to the marine environment?

Net Mtg, 7 Feb 2007


This has been addressed as part of the Marine ecology specialist study. Mitigation for impacts associated with alien marine organisms are covered in section 6.4.4.2.8

6 The involvement of the Uitenhage chamber of business in the project during and post construction will be appreciated.

Kwa Nobuhle Alliance, Net Mtg, 13

Feb 2007

Cllr Bomvana

The use of the CIDB tender guidelines provide for a transparent and fair tendering basis for the projects included in the container terminal construction. Targeted engagement of specific business chambers is not included in the tender process.

7 When will the project start? Is it possible that it will start in 2007 after the EIA process?

Kwa Nobuhle Alliance, Net Mtg, 13

Feb 2007

Bishop L Koli

Construction due to start mid to latter part of 2007. Refer to Chapter 2 for details.

8 The creation of jobs by the project is welcomed.

SANCO Metro Region, Net Mtg, 22

Feb 2007

Eric Kakana

Noted with thanks.

9 The training programme must be communicated to all stakeholders in the area. This will help in the dissemination of information to the community.


Feb 2007

Thembekile Jonga

Noted with thanks




P a g e 5-28


10 The IDZ and port expansion are welcome and appreciated as they will create employment opportunities for communities which can minimize the high rate of crime in the area. The project appears to balance environmental impacts and social needs.


Feb 2007

Cllr Monde Mtanga

Noted with thanks.

11 Will the existing port activities be relocated to the port of Ngqura?

Motherwell Alliance, Net Mtg, 14 Feb 2007

Nomabhele September

The existing container terminal at the port of PE will remain operational and the capacity of the terminal capped at approximately 400 000 TEUs per annum, whilst the Ngqura container terminal will accommodate the additional global growth in container traffic.

12 How will you ensure the safety of workers at the port during the construction process?

Kwa Langa Alliance, Net Mtg, 12 Feb 2007

Mziyanda Mooi

It is envisaged that Health and Safety conditions and issues will be captured and addressed into the sub-contracting agreements with the overall construction companies. They will be included in the tender and final contractual agreements and form a critical part of the adjudications as well as construction supervision phase.

13 What is the future of the existing port? Will it continue to operate normally even after the Port of Ngqura is operational?


Tony Nonkonyana

The existing container terminal at the port of PE will remain operational and the capacity of the terminal capped at approximately 400 000 TEUs per annum, whilst the Ngqura container terminal will accommodate the additional global growth in container traffic.

14 Job creation is appreciated but the offices of the Ward Councillors should be used for communication regarding the registration of individuals on the CDC database, information sharing and training opportunities that are offered.


Nomasomi Matinise

CDC has a communication strategy (entitled Interim Communication Strategy, Sept-Dec 2006) which amongst other things, details the process of communication around job creation and registration on CDC’s job database. CDC communicates any information regarding registration on the database, via the Ward Councillors of Motherwell and Wells Estate. CDC also holds “road shows”, whereby information is disseminated at shopping centers and other public places.

15 The use of cooperatives in the development, during construction and operation of the port is encouraged.


Stella Ntongana

Comment noted.




P a g e 5-29


16 As long as the project does not interfere with the environment it can continue as jobs need to be provided.

Faxed comment, 5 March 2007

Dudley Jacko Comment noted.

17 The community of ward 15 supports the project as it will create jobs opportunities for disadvantaged people, woman and the disabled. Our councilor will support the CDC’s labour management and ensure recruitment through the ward committees of the ward.

Written Comment Mzwandile Mbanga, Ward Committee Ward 15

Comment noted.

18 I would like it when the project starts if you would consider the Motherwell community first.

Written comment Monwabisi Gans Actions to maximise use of local labour are covered in chapter 8 (Socio-Economic Study).

19 The people of Nelson Mandela Bay must benefit through job creation as long as the environment is protected and waste is disposed of in the right place.

Written Comment Thembekile Jonga, SANCO Nelsona Mandela Region

Comment noted

20 Everything concerned in my opinion is covered. Fax Comment, 7 Mar 2007

Felicity Weldshot, Lakeside Community Coop

Comment noted.

Date post:	14-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	3 times
Download:	0 times

Chapter 5 of Ngqura/Final... · Chapter 5 : Issues, Comments and Responses Trail Final Scoping...

Documents