Decisions Report - Chapter 5 Special Character Zones, 9 July 2014
Page 1 of 133
Chapter 5 Special Character Zones and Appendix 4 Decisions
5 Special Character Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Noel Henry & Joan Breed
617.001 5 Special Character Zones
Oppose Amend Provisions in Rule 5 Special Character Zones relating density, building height and earthworks for development in the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area. Amend the design guide for the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Area. Amend the zoning of the area to General Residential Zone.
Reject Defer
1. The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5 relating to Lake Waiwhakareke is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Through the Rotokauri Structure Plan it was established that area surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke and the Ridgelines running along the western boundary of Rotokauri has special character that warranted retention. The development of the provisions within the Special Character Zone aim to protect this area from inappropriate urban development that would destroy the character created by these features. Likewise, the development of the Lake Waiwhakareke Design Guide aims to promote good urban design that protects the character of the area as well as ensuring good quality urban development that complements the area.
2. The matter in relation to the zoning is deferred and will be reconvened at a later date.
Gary Richard Wiseman
941.001 5 Special Character Zones
Oppose Amend the provisions within Section 5 (Special Character Zones) in relation to development within Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area by increasing the minimum area to 600m2 for all building activity, amending the minimum number of storeys from two to one, deleting the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape provisions and replacing them with normal residential provisions.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5 relating to Lake Waiwhakareke is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Through the Rotokauri Structure Plan it was established that area surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke and the Ridgelines running along the western boundary of Rotokauri has special character that warranted retention. The development of the provisions within the Special Character Zone aim to protect this area from inappropriate urban development that would destroy the character created by these features. Likewise, the development of the Lake Waiwhakareke Design Guide aims to promote good urban design that protects the character of the area as well as ensuring good quality urban development that complements the area.
Melanie Jane Wiseman
958.002 5 Special Character Zones
Oppose Amend the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area to increase the minimum area to 600m2 for all building activity, amend the minimum number of storeys from two to one, make amendments to the design guide, and delete the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Area so that the area is dealt with as General Residential.
Reject Defer
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5 relating to Lake Waiwhakareke is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Through the Rotokauri Structure Plan it was established that area surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke and the Ridgelines running along the western boundary of Rotokauri has special character that warranted retention. The development of the provisions within the Special Character Zone aim to protect this area from inappropriate urban development that would destroy the character created by these features. Likewise, the development of the Lake Waiwhakareke Design Guide aims to promote good urban design that protects the character of the area as well as ensuring good quality urban development that complements the area.
The matter in relation to the zoning is deferred and will be reconvened at a later date.
The House Movers Section of New Zealand Heavy Haulage Association (Inc), Prestige Building Removals Ltd, Willcox Building Removals Ltd and The House Movers (Rotorua) Ltd (together referred to as "House Movers")
1167.002 5 Special Character Zones
Oppose Delete, replace or amend all objectives, policies rules and methods in Chapter 5 and elsewhere relating to Special Character Zones/Dwelling Control Areas that regulates removal and relocation in a “dwelling control area” as a discretionary activity.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5 relating to ‘dwelling control area’ is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Not support the intent of Section 6(f) of the RMA The purpose of the “Dwelling Control Area” is to ensure that the distinct character found in Hamilton East is protected. The main elements of this character being the building style of the pre-1940 dwellings, the relationship to the street the dwellings have, and the setback which creates a distinct streetscape. A Discretionary Activity status has been placed on the demolition and relocation of pre-1940 dwellings located within the Dwelling Control Area as shown in Figure 4-1 in Appendix 4 to ensure that proper consideration is given to the impact the demolition or removal of a pre-1940 dwelling will have on the character of the area. The demolition or relocation of all other dwellings within the Dwelling Control Area is a permitted activity. In considering the above it is not appropriate to make changes as the current provision supports the intent of the objectives and policies of Chapter 5 and Section 6(f) of the RMA.
The New Zealand Historic Places Trust
1196.007 5 Special Character Zones
Support Retain the Special Character Zones with their supporting objectives, polices and rules within chapter 5 - Special Character Zones.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the retention of Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted in part as it would
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.003 5 Special Character Zones
Support Retain Special Character Zones. Accept in part
The submission point seeking the retention of Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted in part as it would
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 2 of 133
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.003) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.003) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Lance Harvey 1212.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6 of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.002
Oppose Reject The submission point (1212.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Charles Lowe Hyde Ruwhiu
1213.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.003
Oppose Reject The submission point (1213.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Peter S Thomson 1214.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.004
Oppose Reject The submission point (1214.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Anthony Poutu 1215.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.005
Oppose Reject The submission point (1215.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Wayne Rikki Douglas Te Kira
1216.002 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.006
Oppose Reject The submission point (1216.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Rawiri Hemi 1217.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.007
Oppose Reject The submission point (1217.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Winifred Rose Hemi
1218.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand
FS256.008
Oppose Reject The submission point (1218.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 3 of 133
Corporation
Sharianne Hinemoa Hemi
1219.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.009
Oppose Reject The submission point (1219.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jared Ezra Hemi 1220.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.010
Oppose Reject The submission point (1220.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Ngawati Smiler 1221.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.011
Oppose Reject The submission point (1221.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth Daniels
1222.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.012
Oppose Reject The submission point (1222.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Rawiri Russell Hemi
1223.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.013
Oppose Reject The submission point (1223.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Edmund Wilson 1227.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.014
Oppose Reject The submission point (1227.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Hira Te Rangipumanmao Selwyn
1246.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.015
Oppose Reject The submission point (1246.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Tiwini Hemi 1259.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 4 of 133
characteristics of special areas. Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.016
Oppose Reject The submission point (1259.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Hene Chase 1260.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.017
Oppose Reject The submission point (1260.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
David John Thomson
1261.001 5 Special Character Zones
Support Supports the creation of Special Character Zones to protect, maintain and enhance the characteristics of special areas.
Accept The submission point supporting the Special Character Zones in Chapter 5 is accepted as it:
Supports the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Supports section 6(f) of the RMA
Supports the RPS
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.018
Oppose Reject The submission point (1261.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
5.1 Purpose
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Francis Fitzpatrick 407.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jared Vaughan Ormsby
408.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Dean Westerlund 409.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Maroni John Westerlund
410.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Glenn Burgess 411.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jeff Nikoia 412.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District)
413.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Mark Green 414.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jody Walters 415.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Toni Elkington 416.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Dale Pateriki Anderson
417.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby
418.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Wayne Rogers 919.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Anthony Shaun 930.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set Accept in The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 5 of 133
Wilson out in 5.1 Purpose part with no fundamental change in its intent.
Guy Anthony Perrett
933.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Pauline Norma O'Brien
936.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Estonie Jean Funaki
939.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
E'stonie Jean Petersen
942.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Bruce Alafoki Kaufana
944.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Heather Margaret Kaufana
947.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jared Edward Coromandel
948.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel
950.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
David Edward Coromandel
952.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
IFan Wu 954.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Airini Forbes 956.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lei Sarkovich 964.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Boyd Sarkovich 965.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Gavin Sarkovich 969.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Patsy Karene 970.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Wero Karena 971.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Holly Lin 973.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Karen Hoki Parker 975.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Patrick Taitoko 997.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lavinia Maria Taitoko
998.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi
999.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Erina Dee & Tony Osborne
1000.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Daniel Parker 1001.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Tony Elkington 1028.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 6 of 133
John A Kendall 1029.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Megan Kendall 1031.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
The Errol John Kendall Family -
1033.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Rei Kendall (Kendall Family)
1034.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jenna Walmsley 1035.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe)
1036.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Joe Hay (Hay Family)
1037.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Te Waata R Greening
1038.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Matai Christian Parata Family
1039.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Susan Elizabeth Thomson
1041.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Colby Osborne 1042.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Anton Osborne 1043.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Kendall Graham 1044.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Romana Graham 1045.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Vicki Wihongi 1046.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ashton Frew 1047.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Pamela Mabel Heremaia
1048.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Kylie Michelle Birks
1049.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.016 5.1 Purpose Support in part
Support the inclusions of special character and heritage areas in the District Plan. But 5.1e) incorrectly characterises all the city’s Special Character Areas as ‘primarily for residential purposes’ and this is not the case for the Temple View Character Area. Elsewhere in 5.1 the same inaccurate characterisation can also be found, either explicitly or implicitly e.g. 5.1c). Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Amend text to place a stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play within character
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1. is accepted in part as it would
Provide clarity to the plan user
Historic Heritage is more appropriately addressed via Chapter 19 See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 7 of 133
areas and the importance given to their ongoing protection.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.029
Oppose Reject The submission point (1050.016) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Helen Judith Thomson
1052.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Rebecca Hippolite 1053.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Alexandra Dee 1054.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Julie Nicole Morley 1055.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Velroy Crystal Matthews
1056.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola
1057.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ann Bella Johnson 1058.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere
1060.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Alan Francis Thomson
1061.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ariana Murphy 1062.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Darnie Eden Paraha
1063.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Rachel Elizabeth Thomson
1064.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Debbie Solomon 1065.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Alisha Willis 1066.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Marsden Boyd Gaabdora
1067.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Mikala T Watene 1069.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Harrisson Balabat Jull
1070.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Emmeline Sunnex 1071.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
William Kent Money (Envision Team)
1072.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 8 of 133
Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management)
1074.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Garrick Wayne Parr
1075.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Owen Purcell 1076.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Noeleen Blanche Forbes
1077.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
George Kaka 1078.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Janie Edwards 1079.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs
1080.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith
1081.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Shirley T Rago 1085.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Peihana Owen 1086.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Edna Mabel Johnson
1087.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
R Andrew Joseph 1088.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Marie Pere Joseph 1089.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Kristen Hartley 1090.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Deborah Leigh Brunton
1091.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ken Williams 1092.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Brian Smith (Spotswood)
1095.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Marama Mete 1096.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Roena McCarthy 1097.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Alice Brown-Haenga
1100.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 9 of 133
Ringihia Te Aroha Watene
1101.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Charlotte W Timu 1102.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1103.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Annetta Margaret Peihopa
1105.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Desiree Joyce Park 1107.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Raymond Russell Park
1114.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu
1116.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Peter Mete-Smith 1118.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Laitohi Elkington 1119.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Brian James Hollis 1120.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Patricia Helen Going
1121.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1124.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes
1125.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Myra Wineera 1127.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka Warwick
1128.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ivory Tangaroa 1129.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Te Naera Tangaroa
1130.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Googie Pirika Whatu Apiti
1155.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Milford Rogers Hamon
1156.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Niall Baker 1158.019 5.1 Purpose Support in part
Amend Chapter 5 to accurately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Amend text to also place a stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play within character areas and the importance of their ongoing protection.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1. is accepted in part as it would
Provide clarity to the plan user
Historic Heritage is more appropriately addressed via Chapter 19 See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.05
Oppose Reject. The submission point (1050.016) to which the further submission relates has been accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 10 of 133
Pahemata Kay Apiti
1160.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Percy Te Hira 1162.001 5.1 Purpose Support Retain Rule 5.1 supports the Special Character Zones
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Reihana Patrick Nuku
1172.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Talmadge Temuera Harris
1173.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Luana Wikitoria Paki
1174.001 5.1 Purpose Support Retain Rule 5.1 supports the Special Character Zones
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
John Charles Paki 1175.001 5.1 Purpose Support Retain Rule 5.1 supports the Special Character Zones
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Hata Tipoki 1176.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Kahuwaero Katene 1177.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Mere Marnie Edwards (The NZ Labour Missionary Assn Charitable Trust)
1178.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Kathleen Joyce Tipoki
1179.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Evan H Smith 1180.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Eve McAnnalley 1181.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Casey Mania Haeata
1182.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
James Ratana (Genesis Energy)
1183.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ashley Rangitane Hiki Haeata
1184.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Verdon Anthony Bartlett
1185.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Douglas Kanuela Strother
1186.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Robert Andrew Joseph
1187.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Mark Brian Hague 1188.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Leslie R Newman 1189.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Strantz Dalton Wihongi
1190.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Hineawe Hapuku 1191.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Ripeka Hapuku 1192.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 11 of 133
Quintin A Hapuku 1193.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jordyn D H Smith 1194.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa Kershaw-Smiler
1197.005 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Pirihi Te Ohaki (Bill) Ruwhiu
1210.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Maxwell George Horsford
1225.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
John Hoani Uru Katene
1228.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jeanette Katene 1229.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Scott McAnnalley 1230.004 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Jenna Maria Burgess
1231.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Hana Mariea Haeata
1232.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lana Charrell Kershaw-Ryan (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1233.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Esta Vernice Metekingi
1234.002 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Lillian Winifred Kershaw
1235.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Charlotte Esther Ferris
1236.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Chick Tarawa-Rameka (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1237.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
Thomas Tamai Kershaw
1238.001 5.1 Purpose Support Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Accept in part
The submission point supports the intent of 5.1. However it is accepted in part as its wording has been modified as a result of other submission points with no fundamental change in its intent.
5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups)
247.001 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Support in part
Amend 5.1.1.1 b) to include reference to low-density and medium-density development and historical infilling and construction of apartments to better acknowledge the current moderate housing density (not low density as stated in the plan).
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1.1.1 b) is accepted in part as it would:
Support the intent of the Objectives and policies
More fairly describe the environment.
Russelle Knaap 690.002 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Oppose Delete 5.1.1.1 Purpose statement - Special Residential Zone - Claudelands West
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1.1.1 is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
The statement is considered appropriate to reflect the zone purpose.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 12 of 133
New Zealand Historic Places Trust (General Manager)
FS182.003
Oppose Accept The submission point (690.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.046
Oppose Accept The submission point (690.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.006 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Oppose Amend 5.1.1.1 b) the description of Claudelands West to include activities such as businesses, flats, railway line etc that affect the character of the area. Amend 5.1.1.1 c) by deleting reference to preserving existing character and allow for high density residential development.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1.1.1 b) and c) is accepted in part as:
Amending 5.1.1.1b support the objectives and polices of the Plan
Deletion of 5.1.1.1c would not support the objectives and policies of the Plan
The Claudelands West Area is considered important to the fabric of the City. It clearly has a mix of activities around the fringes of the area, along with containing a variety of housing stock, single and second dwellings and apartment blocks. All of these elements represent housing developments that add to the character of what’s deemed to be the Claudelands West Area today.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.027
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.006) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.006 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Oppose Amend 5.1.1.1b) to mention the existence of many businesses, sausage flats, the railway line and arterial roads in the area, and to acknowledge that these significantly affect the character and amenity of Claudelands West. Amend 5.1.1.1c) to refer to the development of Claudelands West as a high density residential and mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.1.1.1 b) and c) is accepted in part as:
Amending 5.1.1.1b support the objectives and polices of the Plan
Deletion of 5.1.1.1c would not support the objectives and policies of the Plan
The Claudelands West Area is considered important to the fabric of the City. It clearly has a mix of activities around the fringes of the area, along with containing a variety of housing stock, single and second dwellings and apartment blocks. All of these elements represent housing developments that add to the character of what’s deemed to be the Claudelands West Area today.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.008
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.006) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
5.1.1.2 Hamilton East
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Russelle Knaap 690.003 5.1.1.2 Hamilton East
Oppose Delete Purpose Statement 5.1.1.2 (Hamilton East).
Reject The submission point seeking the removal of Hamilton East from the Special Character Zone is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan The aim of including Hamilton East within the Special Character Zone is to continue to protect the already indentified special character. The Hamilton East area was introduced into the Operative District Plan through Variation 20 which aims to maintain and enhance the distinctive character and amenity values found in Hamilton East. The provisions recognise the existing environment within Hamilton East. It does not seek to stop development occurring, rather to manage how development occurs to ensure it is in keeping with the character of the area. The standards for Hamilton East form a permitted baseline and any development proposal that is unable to meet these standards would be considered through a resource consent process. As a result development proposals may be granted or declined as appropriate on a case by case basis. Therefore the provisions associated with Hamilton East allow for the development of properties to meet today’s lifestyle.
Housing New Zealand Corporation
FS256.019
Support Reject The submission point (690.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Area
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.017 5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Area
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.1.1.3d) The Dwelling Control Area by either linking it to objectives, policies and rules OR delete. Confirm if "Soldier Cottages" warrant scheduling as heritage items.
Reject The submission seek the amendment to Dwelling Control Area is rejected based on:
Contrary to the objectives and polices The ‘Soldiers’ Cottages’ are a group of Californian bungalow-style dwellings constructed between 1922 and 1935 and are situated within the Hamilton East high density area. These dwellings were determined through Variation 20 “Managing Change and Character in Hamilton East” to the now Operative
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 13 of 133
District Plan as having visual and architectural character and unity that was worth protection. These houses are, under the Operative District Plan afforded a degree of protection through character protection provision in that plan. They are the same provisions as proposed in the Proposed District Plan. The protection is via character provisions rather than heritage due to a number of these dwellings having been modified, which has meant they do not warrant scheduling as heritage items. Notwithstanding this, it is considered that these buildings as a collective should be protected, and so to provide this grouping of dwellings protection an exception has been made to the Dwelling Control Area (Policy 5.2.3 e)) incorporating them. As a result, alterations and additions forward of the front building line are a restricted discretionary activity (Rule 5.3.1) and removal or demolition a discretionary activity (Rule 5.3.1 kk).
Niall Baker 1158.020 5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Area
Support in part
Delete or Amend Rule 5.1.1.3d) - The Dwelling Control Area, by linking it to Objectives, policies and rules. Clarify if "Soldier Cottages" warrant scheduling as heritage items.
Reject The submission seek the amendment to Dwelling Control Area is rejected based on:
Contrary to the objectives and polices The ‘Soldiers’ Cottages’ are a group of Californian bungalow-style dwellings constructed between 1922 and 1935 and are situated within the Hamilton East high density area. These dwellings were determined through Variation 20 “Managing Change and Character in Hamilton East” to the now Operative District Plan as having visual and architectural character and unity that was worth protection. These houses are, under the Operative District Plan afforded a degree of protection through character protection provision in that plan. They are the same provisions as proposed in the Proposed District Plan. The protection is via character provisions rather than heritage due to a number of these dwellings having been modified, which has meant they do not warrant scheduling as heritage items. Notwithstanding this, it is considered that these buildings as a collective should be protected, and so to provide this grouping of dwellings protection an exception has been made to the Dwelling Control Area (Policy 5.2.3 e)) incorporating them. As a result, alterations and additions forward of the front building line are a restricted discretionary activity (Rule 5.3.1) and removal or demolition a discretionary activity (Rule 5.3.1 kk).
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.017 5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Area
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.1.1.3 c) by correcting the reference to 4-1.
Accept The submission point seek the amendment to Rule 5.1.1.3 c) is accepted as it would:
Improve plan use and correctly reference. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Russelle Knaap 690.018 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Oppose Do not adopt 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone. Reject The submission seeking that 5.1.2 not be adopted is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
It being contrary to sections 5 and 6 of the RMA
Special heritage areas have been identified for their historic importance as well as their architectural significance within the City, and in case of Hayes Paddock nationally. The Council is required under Section 6 of the RMA to protect heritage within the City and have done so through the identification of individual heritage items as well as grouping of buildings which encapsulate the historic heritage of the City. Council has protected these areas through the creation of special heritage zones. The provisions that are associated with these areas do not prevent the on-going use of these houses to a standard that meets the needs of today’s society, however, development needs to be sensitive to the heritage values.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.047
Oppose Accept The submission point (690.018) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.018 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Oppose Relocate 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone to Chapter 19 Historic Heritage.
Reject The submission seeking that 5.1.2 relocated is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
It being contrary to sections 5 and 6 of the RMA
Relates better to special character zone objectives and policies.
Chapter 19 Historic Heritage dealt with specific Heritage buildings, Structures and Sites while the Special Character Chapter deals with specific areas that have special character which includes heritage values. The Special Heritage Zones recognizes the heritage of these areas but also identifies other factors that influence the character and historic context of these areas. However, whilst not all buildings within these heritage areas are listed as individual heritage items or have specific heritage value they all still contribute to the overall heritage value of the area. Rule 5.1.2 provides provisions that ensure the retention of the heritage values of these areas but also the character that non-heritage items also contribute.
Niall Baker 1158.021 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Oppose Amend the plan so 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone is included within to Chapter 19 Historic Heritage.
Reject The submission seeking that 5.1.2 not be adopted is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan.
It being contrary to sections 5 and 6 of the RMA
Relates better to special character zone objectives and policies.
Special heritage areas have been identified for their historic importance as well as their architectural significance within the City, and in case of Hayes Paddock nationally. The Council is required under Section 6 of the RMA to protect heritage within the City and have done so through the identification of
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 14 of 133
individual heritage items as well as grouping of buildings which encapsulate the historic heritage of the City. Council has protected these areas through the creation of special heritage zones. The provisions that are associated with these areas do not prevent the on-going use of these houses to a standard that meets the needs of today’s society, however, development needs to be sensitive to the heritage values.
5.1.2.1 Frankton Railway Village
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point
FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
The New Zealand Historic Places Trust
1196.008 5.1.2.1 Frankton Railway Village
Support Retain 5.1.2.1 Purpose Statement for Frankton Railway Village.
Accept The submission point supporting the inclusions of Frankton Railway Village is accepted as it
Supports the intent of the objectives and polices of the plan.
Supports the intent of Section 6 of the RMA
5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Barry Laurence Flay 350.003 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Support Retain Rule 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone Accept in part
The submission seeking the retention of 5.1.3 is accepted in part as another submission point has been accepted which seeks amendments.
George William Holland
840.004 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Support Amend 5.1.3 Special Natural Area to ensure that development around Lake Waiwhakareke does not impact on the Lake with particular attention given to drainage, plantings and animals.
Reject The submission point seek amendments to Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area be rejected as it:
Would not improve the intent of the plan
Adequate protection is provided through current provisions The Lake Waiwhakareke Heritage Park has been identified as an important natural feature and accordingly development around the lake has been managed through the Special Natural Area. The objectives and policies encourages planting schemes on the surrounding land that will complement the park as well as ensure that development is consistent with the Lake Wawhakareke Landscape Character Area Design Guide, whose purpose is to protect and enhance the special character of the Lake Waiwhakareke area. The inclusion of control over activities within or affecting the Peat Lakes, Wetlands and Peat Lake Catchments that would provide further controls over activities such as vegetation removal, earthworks, and stormwater disposal that may have an impact on the Lake Waiwhakareke Reserve have been considered as part of the Natural Environments Chapter. The inclusion of these provisions would provide the controls sought by the submitter to protect Lake Waiwhakareke.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.018 5.1.3.1 Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area
Support in part
Amend 5.1.3.1b) to ensure it refers to the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area.
Accept The submission seeking the amendment to 5.1.3.1 b) is accepted as this would:
Improve clarity of the plan and intent of the provision. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Robert W. Belbin 291.006 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.014
Support Accept The submission point (291.006) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Francis Fitzpatrick 407.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jared Vaughan Ormsby
408.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Dean Westerlund 409.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Maroni John Westerlund
410.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Glenn Burgess 411.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jeff Nikoia 412.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 15 of 133
Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District)
413.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Mark Green 414.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jody Walters 415.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Toni Elkington 416.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Dale Pateriki Anderson
417.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby
418.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rakaipaka Puriri 898.001 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Oppose Include posts on blog www.saveccnz.wordpress.com as independent submissions against 5.1.4 Temple View Zone.
Reject The submission point is rejected as it does not support the intent of the Temple View Character Area
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.026
Oppose Accept The submission point (898.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Wayne Rogers 919.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Anthony Shaun Wilson
930.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4.
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Guy Anthony Perrett 933.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Pauline Norma O'Brien
936.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Estonie Jean Funaki 939.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
E'stonie Jean Petersen
942.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Bruce Alafoki Kaufana
944.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Heather Margaret Kaufana
947.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jared Edward Coromandel
948.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel
950.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
David Edward Coromandel
952.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
IFan Wu 954.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Airini Forbes 956.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lei Sarkovich 964.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Boyd Sarkovich 965.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 16 of 133
Gavin Sarkovich 969.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Patsy Karene 970.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Wero Karena 971.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Karen Hoki Parker 975.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Patrick Taitoko 997.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lavinia Maria Taitoko
998.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi
999.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Erina Dee & Tony Osborne
1000.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Daniel Parker 1001.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Tony Elkington 1028.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
John A Kendall 1029.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Megan Kendall 1031.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
The Errol John Kendall Family -
1033.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rei Kendall (Kendall Family)
1034.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jenna Walmsley 1035.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe)
1036.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Joe Hay (Hay Family) 1037.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Te Waata R Greening
1038.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Matai Christian Parata Family
1039.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Susan Elizabeth Thomson
1041.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Colby Osborne 1042.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Anton Osborne 1043.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Kendall Graham 1044.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Romana Graham 1045.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Vicki Wihongi 1046.002 5.1.4 Temple Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 17 of 133
View Zone 5.1.4
Ashton Frew 1047.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Pamela Mabel Heremaia
1048.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Kylie Michelle Birks 1049.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Helen Judith Thomson
1052.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rebecca Hippolite 1053.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Alexandra Dee 1054.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Julie Nicole Morley 1055.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Velroy Crystal Matthews
1056.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola
1057.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ann Bella Johnson 1058.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere
1060.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Alan Francis Thomson
1061.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ariana Murphy 1062.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Darnie Eden Paraha 1063.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rachel Elizabeth Thomson
1064.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Debbie Solomon 1065.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Alisha Willis 1066.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Marsden Boyd Gaabdora
1067.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Mikala T Watene 1069.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Harrisson Balabat Jull
1070.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Emmeline Sunnex 1071.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
William Kent Money (Envision Team)
1072.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 18 of 133
Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management)
1074.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Garrick Wayne Parr 1075.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Owen Purcell 1076.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Noeleen Blanche Forbes
1077.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
George Kaka 1078.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Janie Edwards 1079.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs
1080.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith
1081.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Shirley T Rago 1085.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Peihana Owen 1086.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Edna Mabel Johnson
1087.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
R Andrew Joseph 1088.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Marie Pere Joseph 1089.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Kristen Hartley 1090.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 be accepted
Deborah Leigh Brunton
1091.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ken Williams 1092.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Brian Smith (Spotswood)
1095.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Marama Mete 1096.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Roena McCarthy 1097.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Alice Brown-Haenga 1100.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 19 of 133
Ringihia Te Aroha Watene
1101.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Charlotte W Timu 1102.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Edna Rivers Poulava 1103.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Annetta Margaret Peihopa
1105.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Desiree Joyce Park 1107.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Raymond Russell Park
1114.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu
1116.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Peter Mete-Smith 1118.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Laitohi Elkington 1119.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Brian James Hollis 1120.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Patricia Helen Going 1121.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Edna Rivers Poulava 1124.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes
1125.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Myra Wineera 1127.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka Warwick
1128.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ivory Tangaroa 1129.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Te Naera Tangaroa 1130.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Googie Pirika Whatu Apiti
1155.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Milford Rogers Hamon
1156.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Pahemata Kay Apiti 1160.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Percy Te Hira 1162.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Reihana Patrick Nuku
1172.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Talmadge Temuera Harris
1173.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Luana Wikitoria Paki 1174.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
John Charles Paki 1175.002 5.1.4 Temple Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 20 of 133
View Zone 5.1.4
Hata Tipoki 1176.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Kahuwaero Katene 1177.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Mere Marnie Edwards (The NZ Labour Missionary Assn Charitable Trust)
1178.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Kathleen Joyce Tipoki
1179.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Evan H Smith 1180.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Eve McAnnalley 1181.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Casey Mania Haeata 1182.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
James Ratana (Genesis Energy)
1183.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ashley Rangitane Hiki Haeata
1184.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Verdon Anthony Bartlett
1185.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Douglas Kanuela Strother
1186.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Robert Andrew Joseph
1187.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Mark Brian Hague 1188.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Leslie R Newman 1189.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Strantz Dalton Wihongi
1190.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Hineawe Hapuku 1191.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Ripeka Hapuku 1192.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Quintin A Hapuku 1193.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jordyn D H Smith 1194.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
The New Zealand Historic Places Trust
1196.009 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Village Heritage Area.
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.06
Support Accept The submission point (1201.004) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa Kershaw-
1197.006 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 21 of 133
Smiler
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.004 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.004) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1201.004) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.003
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1201.004) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Jodhi Ponga 1205.001 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support in part
No relief sought, except to ensure consultation with the Temple View Community
Accept in part
The submission point supports 5.1.4 but seeks no relief therefore has been accepted in part.
Pirihi Te Ohaki (Bill) Ruwhiu
1210.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lance Harvey 1212.003 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Charles Lowe Hyde Ruwhiu
1213.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Peter S Thomson 1214.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Anthony Poutu 1215.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Wayne Rikki Douglas Te Kira
1216.003 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rawiri Hemi 1217.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Winifred Rose Hemi 1218.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Sharianne Hinemoa Hemi
1219.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Oppose Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept in part
The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted in part
Jared Ezra Hemi 1220.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Oppose Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept in part
The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted in part
Ngawati Smiler 1221.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth Daniels
1222.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Rawiri Russell Hemi 1223.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Maxwell George Horsford
1225.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Edmund Wilson 1227.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
John Hoani Uru Katene
1228.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Jeanette Katene 1229.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Scott McAnnalley 1230.001 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 22 of 133
Jenna Maria Burgess 1231.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Hana Mariea Haeata 1232.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lana Charrell Kershaw-Ryan (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1233.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Esta Vernice Metekingi
1234.001 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Lillian Winifred Kershaw
1235.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Charlotte Esther Ferris
1236.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Chick Tarawa-Rameka (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1237.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Thomas Tamai Kershaw
1238.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Hira Te Rangipumanmao Selwyn
1246.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Tiwini Hemi 1259.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Hene Chase 1260.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
Hene Chase 1260.003 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
David John Thomson 1261.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Accept The submission point seeks the retention of 5.1.4 is accepted
5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Area
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Holly Lin 973.002 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Area
Support Support the Temple View Heritage Area set out in 5.1.4.1.
Accept The submission point supporting 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Area is accepted based on:
supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
supports the intent of Section 6 of the RMA
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.019 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Area
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and instead develop a Structure Plan for Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of 4-5 Temple View is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
There would be a loss of clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.03
Oppose Accept The submission point (1050.019) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Bruce William Gordon
FS258.004
Support Reject The submission point (1050.019) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Niall Baker 1158.022 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Area
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts, and develop a Structure Plan for Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of 4-5 Temple View is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
There would be a loss of clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 23 of 133
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.051
Oppose Accept The submission point (1158.022) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudia Anne Rebecca Mason
278.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Allow the demolition of current buildings owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Allow for new buildings that retain the distinctive character of Temple View.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Whilst there has been a reduction in the number of Comprehensive Development Plans from three to two the approach has been refined from having both CDP’s and precincts to only having CDP’s, inclusion of key site information and the addition of general zoning information within the surrounding area context. The streamlining of the CDP areas will assist in ensuring the special character and development in the area is still maintained and enhanced.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5
New Zealand Historic Places Trust (General Manager)
FS182.001
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (278.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (278.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Robert W. Belbin 291.010 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Retain Rule 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.015
Support Accept in Part
The submission point (291.010) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Francis Fitzpatrick 407.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jared Vaughan Ormsby
408.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Dean Westerlund 409.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Maroni John Westerlund
410.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Glenn Burgess 411.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 24 of 133
Area 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jeff Nikoia 412.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Harry Peter Gaastra (Taranaki District)
413.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Mark Green 414.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jody Walters 415.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Toni Elkington 416.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Dale Pateriki Anderson
417.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Wi Te Kawepo Ormsby
418.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Wayne Rogers 919.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Anthony Shaun Wilson
930.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Guy Anthony Perrett
933.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 25 of 133
Pauline Norma O'Brien
936.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Estonie Jean Funaki
939.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
E'stonie Jean Petersen
942.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Bruce Alafoki Kaufana
944.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Heather Margaret Kaufana
947.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jared Edward Coromandel
948.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel
950.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
David Edward Coromandel
952.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
IFan Wu 954.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive development plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is Accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage
Airini Forbes 956.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lei Sarkovich 964.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 26 of 133
Boyd Sarkovich 965.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Gavin Sarkovich 969.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Patsy Karene 970.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Wero Karena 971.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Holly Lin 973.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
College Old Boys Rugby League Club
974.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose Oppose map Figure 4-5 and all supporting clauses. Oppose Mixed Use CDP and the Community Facilities CDP as set out in 5.1.4.2. c), h) and i). Increase the heritage ranking of all heritage items within the Temple View Area and require the LDS Church to retain and re-purpose the listed heritage buildings. Undertake a long-term CDP for all of its landholdings in and around Temple View.
Accept in Part
The submission point is accepted in part as although opposing Figure 4-5 and the specifics of activities being identified through the changes to 5.1.4.2 nc) h) i) as a result of other submissions points their concerns are partly addressed.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.027
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (974.001) to which the Further Submission relates has been accepted in part
Karen Hoki Parker 975.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Patrick Taitoko 997.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lavinia Maria Taitoko
998.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lynette Ramari 999.003 5.1.4.2 Temple Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Accept in The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 27 of 133
Kauluwehi View Character Area
Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Part It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Erina Dee & Tony Osborne
1000.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Daniel Parker 1001.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Tony Elkington 1028.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
John A Kendall 1029.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Megan Kendall 1031.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Errol John Kendall Family -
1033.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rei Kendall (Kendall Family)
1034.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jenna Walmsley 1035.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe)
1036.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Joe Hay (Hay Family)
1037.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 28 of 133
Te Waata R Greening
1038.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Matai Christian Parata Family
1039.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Susan Elizabeth Thomson
1041.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Colby Osborne 1042.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Anton Osborne 1043.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Kendall Graham 1044.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Romana Graham 1045.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Vicki Wihongi 1046.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ashton Frew 1047.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Pamela Mabel Heremaia
1048.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Kylie Michelle Birks
1049.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 29 of 133
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.020 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and develop a Structure Plan for Temple View.5.1.4.2. Amend plan so the Temple View Character Area is elevated to a Heritage Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the deletion of Figure 4-5 and amendment to the PDP to elevate Temple View Character Area to a Heritage Area is accepted in part based on:
Deleting Figure 4-5 would be contrary to the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 assist with the submitters concerns over it being overly descriptive.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.031
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (1050.020) to which the Further Submission relates has been accepted in part
Bruce William Gordon
FS258.005
Support Accept in Part
The submission point (1050.020) to which the Further Submission relates has been accepted in part
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in Part
The submission point (1050.020) to which the Further Submission relates has been accepted in part
Helen Judith Thomson
1052.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rebecca Hippolite 1053.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Alexandra Dee 1054.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Julie Nicole Morley 1055.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Velroy Crystal Matthews
1056.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola
1057.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ann Bella Johnson 1058.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere
1060.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 30 of 133
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Alan Francis Thomson
1061.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ariana Murphy 1062.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Darnie Eden Paraha
1063.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rachel Elizabeth Thomson
1064.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Debbie Solomon 1065.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Alisha Willis 1066.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Marsden Boyd Gaabdora
1067.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Mikala T Watene 1069.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Harrisson Balabat Jull
1070.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Emmeline Sunnex 1071.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 31 of 133
Area 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
William Kent Money (Envision Team)
1072.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management)
1074.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Garrick Wayne Parr
1075.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Owen Purcell 1076.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Noeleen Blanche Forbes
1077.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
George Kaka 1078.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Janie Edwards 1079.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs
1080.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith
1081.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 32 of 133
Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Shirley T Rago 1085.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Peihana Owen 1086.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Edna Mabel Johnson
1087.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
R Andrew Joseph 1088.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Marie Pere Joseph 1089.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Kristen Hartley 1090.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Deborah Leigh Brunton
1091.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ken Williams 1092.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 33 of 133
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Brian Smith (Spotswood)
1095.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Marama Mete 1096.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Roena McCarthy 1097.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hata Puriri (Temple View Heritage Society)
1098.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose Amend 5.1.4.2 to extend the Temple Heritage Precinct by including the Temple View Character Area. Amend Appendix 1.5 to add Historic heritage to the information requirements for preparing Comprehensive Development Plans to ensure the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources addressed. Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts. Council to ask the owners maintain the special character of the area by preserving the David O McKay building for use as a Stake Centre. Council to ensure the owners of the buildings and their representatives “take all reasonable and proper care to keep in a state of good order and repair all buildings and other permanent improvements forming part of the Board's property”. Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can be repurposed. Amend the Plan to rezone the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd from ‘future residential’ to residential. Council encourages the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community organisations regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds. Council does not approve changes to
Reject Reject Accept in part Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the deletion of Figure 4-5 and amendment to the PDP to elevate Temple View Character Area to a Heritage Area is rejected based on:
Contrary to the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 that assist with the submitter’s concerns over it being overly descriptive.
The submission point seeking the deletion of Figure 4-5 and amendment to the PDP to elevate Temple View Character Area to a Heritage Area is accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Assist with the submitters concerns over it being overly descriptive. The submission point seeking preservation of the David O Mckay Building is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking owners to take care of buildings is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking owners to consult with community is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking rezoning of land for future residential is rejected based on:
Better done through the development of a structure plan. The submission point seeking the use of facilities by community organisations is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 34 of 133
Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and additional landscaping
The submission point seeking Council does not approve changes to roading be rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.037
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1098.001) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Alice Brown-Haenga
1100.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ringihia Te Aroha Watene
1101.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Charlotte W Timu 1102.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1103.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Annetta Margaret Peihopa
1105.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Desiree Joyce Park 1107.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Raymond Russell Park
1114.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu
1116.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Peter Mete-Smith 1118.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Laitohi Elkington 1119.003 5.1.4.2 Temple Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Accept in The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 35 of 133
View Character Area
Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Part It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Brian James Hollis 1120.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Patricia Helen Going
1121.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1124.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes
1125.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Myra Wineera 1127.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka Warwick
1128.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ivory Tangaroa 1129.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Te Naera Tangaroa
1130.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Googie Pirika Whatu Apiti
1155.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Milford Rogers Hamon
1156.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 36 of 133
Niall Baker 1158.023 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 and remove references to CDPs at Temple View within Chapter 5. Develop a Structure Plan for Temple View.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the deletion of Figure 4-5 and amendment to the PDP to elevate Temple View Character Area to a Heritage Area is accepted in part based on:
Deleting Figure 4-5 would be contrary to the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 assist with the submitters concerns over it being overly descriptive.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.052
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1158.023) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Pahemata Kay Apiti
1160.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Percy Te Hira 1162.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Elizabeth Patricia Witehira
1165.002 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose 1) Delete reference to Mixed Use and Community Facilities Comprehensive Development Plan in 5.1.4.2 c), h) and i).
2) Retain and re-purpose the heritage listed buildings.
3) Delete 5.1.4.2 f), the Stake Centre on the teacher housing site will destroy the distinctive gateway approach to the Temple.
4) Retain the special character of the teacher housing corridor and reject the realignment of Tuhikaramea Road.
5) Increase the heritage ranking of H106, H107, H109, H133, H134 and H135 from Ranking B to Ranking A in Schedule 8A.
6) List the Matthew Cowley Building and the feature wall and Mendenhall Library as Ranking A in Schedule 8A: Built Heritage.
Accept Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the deletion of reference to CDPs accepted based on:
Supports the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 that assist with the submitters concerns over it being overly descriptive. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5. The submission point seeking retention and repurpose of heritage buildings is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Better suited to be dealt with through resource consent process The submission point seeking deletion of 5.1.4.2 f) is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the objectives and polices The submission point seeking retention of special character of Teacher Housing and opposing road works is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Better suited to be dealt with through resource consent process Submission point is being dealt with in Historic Heritage S42A report Submission point is being dealt with in Historic Heritage S42A report
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.058
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1165.002) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Pita Witehira 1166.004 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Oppose Delete reference to Mixed Use and Community Facilities Comprehensive Development Plan in 5.1.4.2 c), h) and i). 2) Retain and re-purpose the heritage listed buildings.
Accept Reject
The submission point seeking the deletion of reference to CDPs accepted based on:
Supports the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 that assist with the submitter’s concerns over it being overly descriptive. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5. The submission point seeking retention and repurpose of heritage buildings is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Better suited to be dealt with through resource consent process
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 37 of 133
3) Delete 5.1.4.2 f), the Stake Centre on the teacher housing site will destroy the distinctive gateway approach to the Temple. 4) Retain the special character of the teacher housing corridor and reject the realignment of Tuhikaramea Road. 5) Increase the heritage ranking of H106, H107, H109, H133, H134 and H135 from Ranking B to Ranking A in Schedule 8A. 6) List the Matthew Cowley Building and the feature wall and Mendenhall Library as Ranking A in Schedule 8A: Built Heritage. 7) Require the LDS undergo consultation and to comply with requirements of LDS Act.
Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking deletion of 5.1.4.2 f) is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the objectives and polices The submission point seeking retention of special character of Teacher Housing and opposing road works is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Better suited to be dealt with through resource consent process
Submission point is being dealt with in Historic Heritage S42A report Submission point is being dealt with in Historic Heritage S42A report The submission point seeking LDS to consult and comply with LDS Act is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.059
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1166.004) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Reihana Patrick Nuku
1172.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Talmadge Temuera Harris
1173.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Luana Wikitoria Paki
1174.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
John Charles Paki 1175.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hata Tipoki 1176.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Kahuwaero Katene 1177.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 38 of 133
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Mere Marnie Edwards (The NZ Labour Missionary Assn Charitable Trust)
1178.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Kathleen Joyce Tipoki
1179.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Evan H Smith 1180.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Eve McAnnalley 1181.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Casey Mania Haeata
1182.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
James Ratana (Genesis Energy)
1183.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ashley Rangitane Hiki Haeata
1184.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Verdon Anthony Bartlett
1185.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Douglas Kanuela Strother
1186.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Robert Andrew Joseph
1187.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Mark Brian Hague 1188.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 39 of 133
Area 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area. Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Leslie R Newman 1189.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Strantz Dalton Wihongi
1190.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hineawe Hapuku 1191.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ripeka Hapuku 1192.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Quintin A Hapuku 1193.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jordyn D H Smith 1194.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa Kershaw-Smiler
1197.007 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.005 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support in part
Amend the explanations in 5.1.4.2 d), e), f), and g) to provide greater clarity on character and values for the Temple View Character Area, as set out in the submission. Retain 5.1.4.2 h).
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 the amendment to 5.1.4.2.d) e) f) and g) is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Improve clarity and improve usability of the plan.
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
It ensures the CDP process is not considered a predetermined process
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1201.005) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1201.005) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.004
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission (1201.005) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Pirihi Te Ohaki 1210.003 5.1.4.2 Temple Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Accept in The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 40 of 133
(Bill) Ruwhiu View Character Area
Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Part It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lance Harvey 1212.002 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Charles Lowe Hyde Ruwhiu
1213.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Peter S Thomson 1214.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Anthony Poutu 1215.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Wayne Rikki Douglas Te Kira
1216.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rawiri Hemi 1217.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Winifred Rose Hemi
1218.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Sharianne Hinemoa Hemi
1219.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jared Ezra Hemi 1220.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Ngawati Smiler 1221.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 41 of 133
Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth Daniels
1222.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rawiri Russell Hemi
1223.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Maxwell George Horsford
1225.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Edmund Wilson 1227.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
John Hoani Uru Katene
1228.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jeanette Katene 1229.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Scott McAnnalley 1230.002 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Jenna Maria Burgess
1231.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hana Mariea Haeata
1232.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lana Charrell Kershaw-Ryan (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1233.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Esta Vernice Metekingi
1234.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 42 of 133
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lillian Winifred Kershaw
1235.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Charlotte Esther Ferris
1236.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Chick Tarawa-Rameka (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1237.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Thomas Tamai Kershaw
1238.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hira Te Rangipumanmao Selwyn
1246.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Tiwini Hemi 1259.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hene Chase 1260.004 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
David John Thomson
1261.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area
Support Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point supporting the Comprehensive Development Plan and precincts in 5.1.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
It supports the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Waikato Chamber of Commerce
698.006 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones
Support in part
Amend 5.2 Objectives and Policies 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6 and 5.2.7 - Special Character Zones - by replacing the word "shall" with "must have regard to".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2 is accepted in part based on:
Changes sought by other submitters seeking the use of the word ‘Should’
Would support the intent of the Plan
Providing clear guidance to plan users See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Environmental Research Institute, University of
1008.007 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character
Support in part
Amend Policy 5.2.5a i) and add a new policy 5.2.1f) protecting and enhancing Lake Waiwhakareke.
Accept
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.5 a) i) is accepted in part based on:
Policy relating to Lake Waiwhakareke better located in 5.2.5 a)
Support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 43 of 133
Waikato Zones
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.021 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones
Support in part
Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Provide stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Chapter 5 is rejected based on:
Chapter 5 identifies and describes all current special character areas through the purpose and objectives and policies.
The Historic Heritage role is described in the Purpose and Objectives and Policies and linked to Chapter 19
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.032
Oppose Accept The submission point (1050.021) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Niall Baker 1158.024 5.2 Objectives and Policies Special Character Zones
Support in part
Amend Chapter 5 to accurately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Provide stronger emphasis on the defining role of historic heritage.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Chapter 5 is rejected based on:
Chapter 5 identifies and describes all current special character areas through the purpose and objectives and policies.
The Historic Heritage role is described in the Purpose and Objectives and Policies and linked to Chapter 19
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.053
Oppose Accept The submission point (1158.024) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.008 5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in part
Amend Policy 5.2.1a as set out in the submission to address development in the Peacocke Structure Plan area, and include a new policy under Objective 5.2.1 as set out in the submission, along with an additional statement in the Explanation section. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. Alternatively the Peacocke area should have its own chapter rather than trying to apply objectives and policies that are genuinely design for ‘special character areas’.
Accept Reject
The submission point seeking the amendment to Policy 5.2.1 is accepted as it would
Better align the policies with the intended development of the Peacocke Special Character Zone. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5. The submission point seeking the introduction of a new Chapter for Peacocke is rejected as it would
Not support the intent of the objectives of the Plan.
Currently the Peacocke area has a rural nature and is zoned as Peacocke Future Urban Area under the Operative District Plan. The Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy identifies the Peacockes Area as one of the City’s main residential growth nodes with development expected to occur, as outlined in HUGS around 2030. The intention has always been that the development within the Peacockes area would take on an urban form. Through the settlement of the appeals to Variation 14 (Peacocke Structure Plan) to the Operative District Plan a number of distinctive natural character were also identified, being the gully area, hill area and terrace area along the Waikato River. These features having been incorporated into a set of enabling plan provisions to allow urban development while protecting the character features of the area. The proposed plan has adopted these development provisions to ensure that the natural character features are translated into the development of the area and not be completely destroyed by development.
Waikato Regional Council
714.024 5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in part
Amend Policy 5.2.1e to delete the words 'wherever possible', and Include new policy 5.2.1f under Objective 5.2.1 (Special Character Zones) regarding the protection and enhancement of Lake Waiwhakareke.
Accept Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.1 e) is accepted as it would
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintain the plan’s framework and workability
Provide plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5. The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.1 e) is accepted in part as it would
Support the protection of Lake Waiwhakareke
Introduced under Objective 5.2.5 Special Natural Zone.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.012
Oppose Reject The submission point (714.024) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Property Council New Zealand
938.042 5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.1a, b, d and e by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.1 a) b) d) and e) be accepted in part based on:
Supporting the intent of the Plan
Maintaining the plan’s framework and workability
Providing plan users with a clear guidance as to the importance of the particular objective and policies
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 44 of 133
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.042.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.042.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.042.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.044 5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose Amend 5.2.1 Objectives and Policies All Special Character Zones by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.1 is accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
New Zealand Transport Agency
924.043 5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in part
Amend Policy 5.2.2a)iv) of Objective 5.2.2 All Special Character Zones to broaden the scope to include the effect of noise generated from roads.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.2 a) iv) is accepted based on:
Support the intent of the Objectives 5.2.2
Provided clear guidance on the potential noise effects See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Property Council New Zealand
938.043 5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose Amend Policy 5.2.2a by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.2 is accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.043.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.043.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.043.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.045 5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose Amend 5.2.2 Objectives and Policies all Special Character Zones by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.2 is accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Property Council 938.044 5.2.3 Objective Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.3a, d, f, g and h by Accept in The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is Accepted in part based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 45 of 133
New Zealand and Policies Special Residential Zone
replacing the word "shall" with "should". part Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.044.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.044.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.044.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.046 5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.3 Objectives and Policies Special Residential Zone by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is Accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.007 5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone
Oppose 5.2.3 Objective and policies Amend objective 5.2.3 and its associated policies, so that they do not apply to Claudelands West; Add new Objective 5.2.3A specifically for Claudelands West; Delete policies 5.2.3e, 5.2.3f and 5.2.3g.
Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.028
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.007 5.2.3 Objective and Policies Special Residential Zone
Oppose Amend Objective 5.2.3 and its associated policies so that they do not apply to Claudelands West. Include a new objective relating to Claudelands West and its development as a high density residential and mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City. Delete Policy 5.2.3e regarding pre-1940 dwellings and streetscape facades in the Dwelling Control Area, Pre-1939 dwellings in Claudelands West, and add any individual buildings of genuine heritage value to Schedule 8A. Replace Policy 5.2.3f regarding compatibility with houses constructed before 1939 in
Reject Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA The submission point seeking a new policy be included in 5.2.3 is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 e) is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Section 6 of the RMA The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.3 f) is rejected as it:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 46 of 133
Claudelands West, with a policy that requires new buildings be compatible with their immediate surroundings, and the compact city policy. Delete Policy 5.2.3 regarding non-residential activities.
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the intent of Sections 5 and 6 of the RMA
5.2.4 Objective and Policies Special Heritage Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Property Council New Zealand
938.045 5.2.4 Objective and Policies Special Heritage Zone
Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.4a, b, c and d by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.4 is accepted in part based on:
Supporting the intent of the Plan
Maintaining the plan’s framework and workability
Providing plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.045.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.045.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.045.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.047 5.2.4 Objective and Policies Special Heritage Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.4 Objectives and Policies Special Heritage Zone by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.4 is accepted in part based on:
Supporting the intent of the Plan
Maintaining the plan’s framework and workability
Providing plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Waikato Regional Council
714.025 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone
Support in part
Amend Objective 5.2.5 Special Natural Zone to delete the words 'where possible', Amend associated Policy 5.2.5a) to provide wording as set out in the submission relating to protecting and enhancing ecological connections to Lake Waiwhakareke.
Accept Accept
The submission point seeking the amendment to Objective 5.2.5 is Accepted based on:
Supporting the intent of the Plan
Meeting the requirements of the RMA and RPS The submission point seeking the amendment to Objective 5.2.5 a) i) is Accepted based on:
Supporting the intent of the Objectives 5.2.5 of the Plan
Meeting the requirements of the RMA and RPS See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Property Council New Zealand
938.046 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone
Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.5a and 5.2.5b by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.5 is Accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.046.
Peter John Findlay, et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.046.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 47 of 133
Peter John Findlay, et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.046.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.048 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.5 Objectives and Policies Special Natural Zone by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accepted in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.5 is Accepted in part based on:
Supports the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Generation Zero Waikato
1284.012 5.2.5 Objective and Policies Special Natural Zone
Support in part
Supports the establishment of Special Natural Zone Policies 5.2.5a i) and ii).
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Objective 5.2.5 a) i) and ii) is Accepted based on:
Supports the intent of the Objectives 5.2.5 of the Plan
Meets the requirements of the RMA and RPS
490 Grey Ltd as the Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for Living Ltd
FS266.005
Oppose Reject FS266.005 is not relevant to submission point 1284.012
5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Rakaipaka Puriri 63.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area be declined.
Reject The submission point seeking all zoning and land use changes in Temple View is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.013
Oppose Accept The submission point (63.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Claudia Anne Rebecca Mason
278.003 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support Retain 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone. Allow for the demolition of current buildings. New buildings and landscapes to have regard to the special character of the area.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the retention of 5.2.6 is accepted in part as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
Other submitter has sought changes to Rule 5.2.6
New Zealand Historic Places Trust (General Manager)
FS182.002
Oppose Reject The submission point (278.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001 Oppose Reject The submission point (278.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Maari Rose Thompson
739.001 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.021
Oppose Accept The submission point (739.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Chris Thompson 744.001 5.2.6 Objective Support Prohibit the following activities within the Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 48 of 133
and Policies Temple View Zone
in part former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.022
Oppose Accept The submission point (744.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Stella Neale Kenyon 745.001 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities, within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling, alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.023
Oppose Accept The submission point (739.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Property Council New Zealand
938.047 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.6a to 5.2.6j by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accepted in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.6 is Accepted in part based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.047.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.047.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.047.
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.022 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.6 Objectives and Policies -Temple View, so that it is consistent with other special character areas so it promotes special character and heritage value rather than development. Do not promote the development plan.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.6 is Accepted in part based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Provided clear guidance on the potential development of the area while still protecting historic heritage See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.033
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (1050.022) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Helena Maddison 1133.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
FS180.038
Oppose Accept The submission point (1133.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 49 of 133
Trust Board
Genevieve Van Eden
1134.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.039
Oppose Accept The submission point (1134.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Eileen Phillips 1137.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.04
Oppose Accept The submission point (1137.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Sue Nikora 1138.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.041
Oppose Accept The submission point (1138.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Kasmin Joy Nikora 1139.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.042
Oppose Accept The submission point (1139.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Janelle Moana Nikora
1140.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.043
Oppose Accept The submission point (1140.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Sheree Mere Nikora 1141.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 50 of 133
related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.044
Oppose Accept The submission point (1141.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Wallace Raiti Peter Reihana
1143.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.046
Oppose Accept The submission point (1143.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Te Rina Noelani Ngawaka
1144.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.047
Oppose Accept The submission point (1144.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Lynette Cassidy 1145.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.048
Oppose Accept The submission point (1145.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Christine Makata 1147.002 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Prohibit the following activities of Sunday play and trading; gambling; alcohol consumption; use of tobacco products; and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; within the former CCNZ campus Temple View.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.049
Oppose Accept The submission point (1147.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Niall Baker 1158.025 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone, so that they are consistent with provisions of the other special character areas.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it is
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.054
Oppose Accept The submission point (1158.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 51 of 133
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.006 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Delete OR Amend Policy Objective 5.2.6b) of Temple View Zone to shift the emphasis from 'compatible' to 'sensitive'.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.6 b)is accepted as it
Provides a clear intent of the policy and support objective 5.2.6.
Better supports the intent of the Plan
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.006) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.006) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.005
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.006) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.049 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.6 Objectives and Policies Temple View Zone by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.6 is Accepted in part based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Rakaipaka Puriri 63.001 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area should be declined based on the treatment of their own church members and the shift from a school that benefits tens of thousands to a development that will only benefits the wealthy.
Reject The submission point seeking all zoning and land use changes in Temple View is rejected as it would
Not support the objectives and polices of the Plan.
The issues raised are not ones that can be considered through the RMA process and are best addresses through discussions within the Church Community.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.012
Oppose Accept The submission point (63.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Property Council New Zealand
938.048 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend Policies 5.2.7a to 5.2.7j by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.7 is accepted in part based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.048.
Peter John Findlay, el-al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.048.
Peter John Findlay, el-al(Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.048.
College Old Boys Rugby League Club
974.003 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Support in part
Proposes to prohibit the sale on the former CCNZ campus area of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products, prohibit the use of tobacco and alcohol, and prohibit all Sunday play, which are not in keeping with the current special character of the former CCNZ campus area.
Reject The submission point seeking the control over activities within Temple View is rejected as it
Not within the scope of the 1st
schedule process
The Church of FS180.028 Oppose Accept The submission point (974.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 52 of 133
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.023 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.7 Objectives and Policies Temple View so that it is consistent with other special character areas so that it is focused on special character and heritage values not development. Do not promote the development plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.7 is rejected as it
Does not support the intent of the Plan
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.034
Oppose Accept The submission point (1050.023) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Niall Baker 1158.026 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.7 Objectives and Policies Temple View Zone, so that they are consistent with the provisions of the other special character areas and do not promote a redevelopment plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.7 is rejected as it
Does not support the intent of the Plan
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.055
Oppose Accept The submission point (1158.026) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.007 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Delete Policy 5.2.7h regarding the demolition, removal or alteration of buildings in the Temple View Zone. Amend Policy 5.2.7j so that heritage buildings in the Temple View Zone are used and developed in a manner that maintains their heritage values.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.7 is accepted based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Allows for the on going use of the land while still ensuring the retention of character See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.007) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.007) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.006
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.007) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.050 5.2.7 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend 5.2.7 Objectives and Policies Temple View Zone by replacing "shall" with "should".
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.2.7 is accepted in part based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the importance of the particular objective and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Matthew Taylor 266.005 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.2.8 Objectives and Policies Peacocke Character Zone to include new policy relating to separate pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.2.8 is rejected based on:
More of a rule than an objective or policy.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.001
Oppose Accept The submission that this further submission FS 284.016 oppose has been rejected
The Adare Company Ltd
482.009 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke
Support in part
Amend Policy 5.2.8d (Objective and Policies - Peacocke Character Zone) to include reference to the Master Plan Process and
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.2.8 d) is accepted based on:
Will provide for the better administration of the Plan
Support the intent of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 53 of 133
Character Zone amend explanation of Objective 5.2.8. Peacocke Character Zone to refer to infrastructure capacity limitations. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
J.C Johnson Family Trust
635.001 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone
Oppose Amend Policy 5.2.8d of the Peacocke Character Zone Objective 5.2.8 to include reference to the Master Plan process.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.2.8 d) is accepted based on:
Will provide for the better administration of the Plan
Support the intent of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.006
Support Accept The submission that this further submission FS 284.016 oppose has been accepted
Rex Hannam 935.002 5.2.8 Objective and Policies Peacocke Character Zone
Support Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the retention of Rule 5.2.8 is accepted in part as other submitters have requested changes to Rule 5.2.8.
5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Waikato Regional Council
714.026 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table
Oppose Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to the special natural zone to enable assessment of subdivision and development impacts on ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by triggering assessment against the design guide in section 1.4.4 OR rezone the ecological stream connection (and an appropriate buffer width) into Lake Waiwhakareke to Natural Open Space Zone.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5 including 5.4.13 and Appendix 1.4.7.
Rex Hannam 935.003 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table
Support Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area.
Accept in Part
The submission point seeking the retention of Rule 5.3 – 5.6 is accepted in part as other submitters have requested changes to Rule 5.3 to 5.6
Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato
1008.008 5.3 Rules – Activity Status Table
Oppose Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone, OR identify the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5 including 5.4.13 and Appendix 1.4.7.
5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups)
247.004 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Support in part
Amend 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones relating to Claudelands West as follows: 5.3.1 a - Accessory buildings on the front of properties in Claudelands West should be restricted discretionary activities. Include Claudelands West in the Dwelling
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is accepted based on:
Supporting the intent of the objectives and policies
Ensuring the retention of the Character of the area See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5. The Plan gives a clear direction of the expected activity mix in the special residential zone. Plus, in the Claudelands West area the secondary layer of direction, the activity status, protecting the character formed by the large number of buildings constructed before 1940. However, this could presently be too loosely addressed via the activity status listed in 5.3.1. As identified by Alexander Elliot, it is considered that the existing activity status weakens the policy direction for the area. The objective and policy direction in 5.2 has already been addressed in this report and confirmed as being the most
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 54 of 133
Control Area in Appendix 4. Change section c, in relation to Claudelands West, so all new buildings and alterations on front-facing aspects be RD. Make Apartments NC in Claudelands West, as proposed. Make duplex dwellings NC in Claudelands West, as proposed.
appropriate. Any change to Rule 5.3.1 should not liberalise the activity mix but tighten it to avoid being contrary to the policy framework. Accordingly, a new Rule 5.3.1d is to be inserted to specifically address that the activity status for accessory buildings, additions and alterations as restricted discretionary to ensure protection of the character elements of the area.
Property Council New Zealand
938.049 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose Amend Rules 5.3.1 k)-n) to ensure consistency and certainty with regard to the Activity Status of Managed Care Facilities. Retain Rule 5.3.1z) regarding offices (other than home based business)
Reject Accept
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is rejected as it :
Does not support the intent of the objectives and policies Under Rule 5.3.1 it clearly indicates that a Managed Care Facility for up to 9 residents (Rule 5.3.1 k) would be a permitted activity while a managed care facility beyond that would be a discretionary activity (Rules 5.3.1l) and 5.3.1n). This approach is also consistent with the manner in which managed care facilities are addressed in the Residential zones. The submitter seeks the retention of the Rule be accepted as no other submitter seeks to change the rule.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.027
Oppose Reject FS242.027 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.027
Oppose Reject FS277.027 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.024 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected. Remove the Permitted activity status in 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones for demolition of non-residential buildings in Special Character and Heritage Areas.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan
Hamilton Central Business Association
1115.006 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Support Retain Rule 5.3.1 z) Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones as offices should be discouraged in residential areas.
Accept The submitter seeks the retention of the Rule is accepted as no other submitter seeks to change the rule.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.008 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose 5.3.1 Activity Status Table – Amend the list of activities to promote development of Claudelands West as a future high density residential and mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City as set out in the
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the objectives and policies
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 55 of 133
submission.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.029
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.008) that this further submission oppose has been rejected.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.019 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Support in part
Amend 5.3.1 j), k) and mm) Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones as outlined as tracked changes in the submission.
Accept The submission point seeking the introduction of provisions relating to duplex dwelling in Hayes Paddock and the removal of pre-1939 dwellings within Claudeland West is accepted as it would :
Support the intent of the associated Special Residential Zone objectives and policies
Be consistent with the intent of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Niall Baker 1158.027 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose Amend Chapter 5 to accurately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and protected within the Plan. Amend 5.3.1 Activity Status - Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones by removing the Permitted Activity status for demolition of non-residential buildings.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.051 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose Amend 5.3.1 k) to n) within Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones, relating to managed care facilities to clarify and make consistent the activity status; AND retain 5.3.1 z).
Reject Accept
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the objectives and policies The retention of the Rule is accepted as no other submitter seeks to change the rule.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.008 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Oppose Amend Rule 5.3.1 to promote development of Claudelands West as a future high density residential and mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City. Amend Rules 5.3.1a), b), c), d), f) , g, h), i), j), s), w), x), y), aa), cc), dd) so that new buildings, accessory buildings, alterations and additions, apartments, ancillary residential units and structures, detached dwellings (including second and subsequent dwellings), duplex dwellings, childcare facilities (up to 50 children), health care services, home based businesses, home stay accommodation, places of assembly, restaurants, show homes, visitor accommodation, and indoor recreation centres, are Permitted Activities in the Special Residential Zone: Amend Rule 5.3.1 t) so that childcare facilities for 51 or more children are a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Special Residential Zone Amend Rule 5.3.1 u) so that dairies are a Controlled Activity in the Special Residential Zone Amend Rules 5.3.1 v), z) and bb) so that Tertiary education and specialised training facility, Offices (other than as a home-based business) and Retail activity (other than as a restaurant or home-based business) are Discretionary Activities in the Special
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the objectives and policies
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 56 of 133
Residential Zone.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.009
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.008) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Generation Zero Waikato
1284.014 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones
Support in part
Amend 5.3.1 h) Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones, so that new detached dwellings have a restricted discretionary activity status, taking into account factors P4, R9 and S1.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3.1 is rejected as it does not support the intent of the objectives and policies Under the proposed plan, the establishment of new detached dwellings within the Special Residential Zone and Special Natural Zone are permitted. It is not the intent of the plan to make development within these area overly onerous but rather to ensure that development retains the character of the area through compliance with the General Standards set out in Rule 5.4. It is considered that the introduction of a restricted discretionary activity status would not support the overall intent of the Plan. While, new dwellings within the Special Heriatge Zone are already classed a discretionary activity, this recognises the important of retaining the heritage value of the area.
490 Grey Ltd as the Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for Living Ltd
FS266.005
Oppose Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.049.
5.3.2 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type
Summary Decision Reasoning
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.025 5.3.2 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Oppose Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2 to remove the reference to Comprehensive Development Plans is accepted in part:as the changes to the activity table as a result of submission 1146.020 removing the CDP as an activity and relocating into Rule 5.3.2.2 and 5.3.3.2 will improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.035
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1050.025) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process within the Peacocke Character Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.010 5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process within the Peacocke Character Zone
Support in part
Add new clause to Rule 5.3.2.1 Master Plan - Process within the Peacocke Character Area - as follows: d) Land use consents required under Rule 5.4.1.3 shall be incorporated into the consent process for the Master Plan as Discretionary Activities. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accept The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.1 is accepted as it will:
Supports the intent of the Objectives and Polices of the plan
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
The changes to the activity table, removing the CDP as an activity and relocating into Rule 5.3.2.2 ensures Rules are not ultra vires to the Act (Environment Court Interim Decision No.[2014] NZEnvC93).
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.020 5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process within the Peacocke Character Zone
Support in part
Amend 5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process within the Peacocke Character Zone, by clarifying the relationship between the master plan and resource consent process.
Accept The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.1 is accepted as it will:
Supports the intent of the Objectives and Polices of the plan
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.3.2.2 Comprehensive Development Plan – Process within the Temple View Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Barry Harris 1146.021 5.3.2.2 Support in Amend 5.3.2.2 Comprehensive Accept The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.1 is accepted as it will improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 57 of 133
(Hamilton City Council)
Comprehensive Development Plan – Process within the Temple View Zone
part Development Plan – Process within the Temple View Zone, to clarify the relationship between the resource consent process and the Comprehensive Development Plan.
The decoupling of Temple View Zone from Rule 5.3.2.2 as notified and reformatting the provisions for both Temple View Zone and Peacocke Character Zones does not change the expected outcomes of the provisions; and it continues to support the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan. The changes to the activity table, removing the cap as an activity and relocating, referencing it in Rule 5.3.3.2 (Decision Version) ensures rule is not ultra vires to the Act (Environment Court Interim Decision No. [2014] NZEnvC 93). See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Niall Baker 1158.028 5.3.2.2 Comprehensive Development Plan – Process within the Temple View Zone
Oppose Delete all references to the CDPs for Temple View in Chapter 5 so as to avoid prejudicing future decision making and consent processes.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.1 is accepted in part as the changes to the activity table, as a result of submission 1146.020 removing the CDP as an activity and relocating it into Rule 5.3.3.2 will improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan users.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.056
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1158.028) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.011 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities by: amending clause a) as set out in the submission to set up a 3-part rule where separate approval for development is only required where development is inconsistent with an approved Master Plan; deleting clause b); amending clause c) for clarification purposes as set out in the submission, and deleting clause f).
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.3 is accepted in part as it will:
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Other submitters have sought changes to Rule 5.3.2.3 See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
J.C Johnson Family Trust
635.005 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities
Support in part
That Council provides an undertaking to guarantee that the provisions of Rule 5.3.2.3 (Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities) when applied will operate in a manner consistent with that agreed and settled via previous Environment Court mediation and the consent order entered into.
Reject The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.3 is rejected as it will:
The intent of the Environment Court Consent Order is still retained
Other submitters have sought changes to Rule 5.3.2.3
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.007
Support Reject The submission point (1201.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.022 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities
Support in part
Amend 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities, as outlined as tracked changes in the submission.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.3 is accepted in part as it will:
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Other submitters have sought changes to Rule 5.3.2.3
The changes to the activity table, removing the cap as an activity and relocating, referencing it in Rule 5.3.3.2 (Decision Version) ensures rule is not ultra vires to the Act (Environment Court Interim Decision No. [2014] NZEnvC 93).
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.026
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1146.022) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 58 of 133
The Adare Company Ltd
482.012 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones. Label each column A, B, C. Amend the headings for the Peacocke Character Area to read follows: - In the absence of a Master Plan; - Forming part of the Master Plan process and approval; - Not provided for in, or inconsistent with, an approved Master Plan. Amend the category status for all activities in the Column B (the second column) from RD or NC to D. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.4 is accepted in part as it will:
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Other submitters have sought changes to Rule 5.3.2.4 See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
J.C Johnson Family Trust
635.006 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Oppose Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones. That Council initiates a variation to the Proposed District Plan after undertaking full and meaningful consultation with stakeholders to ensure that the provisions relevant to the Peacocke Character Zone reflect the true intent and spirit of the mediated settlement embodied in the Environment Court Consent Order, or in the alternative That all activities identified in the “with a approved master plan” column be provided for as controlled activities provided that they were approved as part of the master plan process.
Reject The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.4 is rejected as it:
The intent of the Operative District Plan and the Environment Court Consent Order is retained
Has been addressed in the relief sought by other submission points
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.008
Support Reject The submission point (1201.003) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.023 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Support in part
Amend 5.3.2.4 ao) to reflect correct numbering; amend 5.3.2.4 with the column headings provided in the submission; and amend the wording within the Peacocke Character Zone so the relationship between the master plan and consent process are clear.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.4 is accepted in part as it will:
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Other submitters have sought changes to Rule 5.3.2.4 See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.027
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1146.023) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.008 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 o) and p) to correctly reference the Temple Heritage Precinct. Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 kk) so that changes in use once the Temple Comprehensive
Accept in Part
The submission seeking the amendment to 5.3.2.4 is accepted in part as it will:
Improve the administration of the plan and clarity for plan user
Supports the intent of the objectives and policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 59 of 133
Development Plan has been implemented is a Discretionary Activity.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject FS275.001is not relevant to submission point 1201.008.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in part
The submission point (1201.008) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
5.4 Rules – General Standards
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Waikato Regional Council
714.027 5.4 Rules – General Standards
Oppose Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 to enable assessment of subdivision and development impacts on ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by triggering assessment against the design guide in section 1.4.4, or rezone the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5 including 5.4.13 and Appendix 1.4.7.
Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato
1008.009 5.4 Rules – General Standards
Oppose Amend rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone OR identify the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.3 and 5.4 is rejected based on:
The relief sought is addressed in other parts of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5 including 5.4.13 and Appendix 1.4.7.
5.4.1 Density Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups)
247.005 5.4.1 Density Support in part
Amend 5.4.1 Density Table 5.4.1a by increasing site area for detached dwellings on rear lots in Claudelands West to 600m2. Retain other provisions restricting density in the Claudelands West area.
Accept The submission is accepted as it supports the retention of the rule.
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 b) is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices
The submission is accepted as it supports the retention of the rule.
The Adare Company Ltd
482.013 5.4.1 Density Oppose Remove Table 5.4.1b (Density – Peacocke Character Area) and remove cross-reference to Table 5.4.1b in Table 5.4.1a. and add new provision to 5.4.1. (Density) such that in the Peacocke Character Area the residential unit net site area shall be consistent with the thresholds set out in an approved Master Plan. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 b) is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices As the Master Plan process is a Discretionary activity and the intention is for the Master Plan to set the develop standards specific to each neighbourhood, the Standards set out in 5.4.1 b), and the Peacocke Structure Plan are a guideline for the preparation and assessment of the Master Plan. However, as activities can still be proposed without a Master plan as a non-complying activity the inclusion of general standards would allow assessing any application to have a baseline to assess the appropriateness of any activity within the Peacocke Area. Therefore Table 5.4.1 b) is retained.
Janice Ann Verran 854.001 5.4.1 Density Oppose Amend 5.4.1 Density within the Special Character Zones by increasing the minimum area for all building activities to 600m2.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices As part of the development of the Rotokauri Structure Plan the ‘Rotokauri Western Hills Landscape Study’, prepared by Boffa Miskell Ltd in 2007 established that the topogarphy found along the western boundary of Rotokauri was significant in the context of the character of the Rotokauri growth cell
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 60 of 133
as an identifable hill area. The study assisted in the analysis to determine the appropriate lots size for this area that would not undermine the character created by the topography. It is considered that the formation and development of lots of 800m² is required to address and protect the topography from inapproapriate urban development. It is not considered that lots of between 600-750m² would not provide sufficient visual separation between buildings on the hill slopes to enable the visual retention of the topographical character of the area.
Max Walker Verran 855.001 5.4.1 Density Oppose Amend 5.4.1 Density by increasing the minimum area required for all building activity to 600m2.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 b) is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices
As part of the development of the Rotokauri Structure Plan the ‘Rotokauri Western Hills Landscape Study’, prepared by Boffa Miskell Ltd in 2007 established that the topogarphy found along the western boundary of Rotokauri was significant in the context of the character of the Rotokauri growth cell as an identifable hill area. The study assisted in the analysis to determine the appropriate lots size for this area that would not undermine the character created by the topography. It is considered that the formation and development of lots of 800m² is required to address and protect the topography from inapproapriate urban development. It is not considered that lots of between 600-750m² would not provide sufficient visual separation between buildings on the hill slopes to enable the visual retention of the topographical character of the area.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.024
Oppose Accept The submission point (855.001) to which the further submission relates has been rejected..
Lynette Joyce Williams
1050.026 5.4.1 Density Oppose 5.4.1 Density - Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 to delete the reference to CDPs accepted in part based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.036
Oppose Accept in part
The submission point (1050.026) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Hounsell Holdings Ltd
1104.023 5.4.1 Density Oppose 5.4.1 Density - Amend 5.4.1a)a) and 5.4.1a)b) relating to Ridgeline Character Area by reducing the minimum net site area from 800m2 to 600m2.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 is rejected based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices As part of the development of the Rotokauri Structure Plan the ‘Rotokauri Western Hills Landscape Study’, prepared by Boffa Miskell Ltd in 2007 established that the topogarphy found along the western boundary of Rotokauri was significant in the context of the character of the Rotokauri growth cell as an identifable hill area. The study assisted in the analysis to determine the appropriate lots size for this area that would not undermine the character created by the topography. It is considered that the formation and development of lots of 800m² is required to address and protect the topography from inapproapriate urban development. It is not considered that lots of between 600-750m² would not provide sufficient visual separation between buildings on the hill slopes to enable the visual retention of the topographical character of the area.
Niall Baker 1158.029 5.4.1 Density Oppose Delete all references to the CDPs for Temple View in Chapter 5 so as to avoid prejudicing future decision making and consent processes.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 to delete the reference to CDPs accepted in part based on:
Would not support the associated objectives and polices
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.057
Oppose Accepted in part
The submission point (1158.029) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Hamilton JV Investment Company Ltd
1170.023 5.4.1 Density Oppose Amend 5.4.1 Density, by reducing minimum net site area to 600m2 in the Special Natural Zone (Ridgeline Character Area).
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.1 is rejected based on: Would not support the associated objectives and polices As part of the development of the Rotokauri Structure Plan the ‘Rotokauri Western Hills Landscape Study’, prepared by Boffa Miskell Ltd in 2007 established that the topogarphy found along the western boundary of Rotokauri was significant in the context of the character of the Rotokauri growth cell as an identifable hill area. The study assisted in the analysis to determine the appropriate lots size for this area that would not undermine the character created by the topography. It is considered that the formation and development of lots of 800m² is required to address and protect the topography from inapproapriate urban development. It is not considered that lots of between 600-750m² would not provide sufficient visual separation between buildings on the hill slopes to enable the visual retention of the topographical character of the area.
5.4.10 Buildings and Activities within the Temple View
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands 1126.024 5.4.10 Buildings and Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.10 Buildings and Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.10 is rejected based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 61 of 133
Property Trust Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area
Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Would not support the intent of the associated objectives and polices
This rule is solely focused on Temple View. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to insert a Claudelands focus
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.010 5.4.10 Buildings and Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.10 f) to allow more flexibility for new building forms, as set out in the submission.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.10 is accepted based on:
Would support the associated objectives and polices
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.010) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.010) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.008
Oppose Reject The submission point (1201.010) to which the further submission relates has been accepted.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.017 5.4.10 Buildings and Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.10 is rejected based on:
Would not support the intent of the associated objectives and polices
Generation Zero Waikato
1284.015 5.4.10 Buildings and Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.10 f) Buildings and Activities within the Temple View Character Area and Temple View Heritage Area, should take into consideration conditions C9, C20, J1, P4, R7, R9 and S1.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.10 is rejected based on:
Would add unnecessary duplication of processes to the administration of the plan
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.061
Oppose Accept The submission point (1284.015) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
490 Grey Ltd as the Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for Living Ltd
FS266.005
Oppose Reject FS266.005 is not relevant to submission point 1284.015.
5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
John Elliott Stevenson
18.010 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Support in part
Remove Rule 5.4.11. b) iv in relation to the location of outdoor living areas
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule b) iv) from Rule 5.4.11 and Figure 5.4.11 e) is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Would not maintain the plan’s framework and workability
Would not provide a clear guidance of the intent of the Rule 5.4.11 It is considered that the orientation of the outdoor living area is important to ensure the end users have an enhanced on-site amenity. Nevertheless, if an applicant wishes to place greater importance on another standard which requires the position of the outdoor living area, other than in a northern direction the resource consent process would enable consideration of the proposal to ensure good quality outcomes are ultimately achieved
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 62 of 133
Property Council New Zealand
938.054 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.11 b) (iv) (Outdoor Living Area) and Figure 5.4.11e
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule b) iv) from Rule 5.4.11 and Figure 5.4.11 e) is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Would not maintain the plan’s framework and workability
Would not provide a clear guidance of the intent of the Rule 5.4.11 It is considered that the orientation of the outdoor living area is important to ensure the end users have an enhanced on-site amenity. Nevertheless, if an applicant wishes to place greater importance on another standard which requires the position of the outdoor living area, other than in a northern direction the resource consent process would enable consideration of the proposal to ensure good quality outcomes are ultimately achieved
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.054.
Peter John Findlay, el-al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.054.
Peter John Findlay, el-al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.054.
Rotokauri Developments Ltd
1015.010 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose Delete (b) (iv) from Rule 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area. Consequential amendment: Delete Figure 5.4.11e.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule b) iv) from Rule 5.4.11 and Figure 5.4.11 e) is rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Would not maintain the plan’s framework and workability
Would not provide a clear guidance of the intent of the Rule 5.4.11 It is considered that the orientation of the outdoor living area is important to ensure the end users have an enhanced on-site amenity. Nevertheless, if an applicant wishes to place greater importance on another standard which requires the position of the outdoor living area, other than in a northern direction the resource consent process would enable consideration of the proposal to ensure good quality outcomes are ultimately achieved
Hounsell Holdings Limited
FS248.003
Support Rejects The submission point (1015.010) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Hamilton JV Investments Limited
FS254.006
Support Reject The submission point (1015.010) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.025 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.11 in respect of Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices
The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflect those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly. It is important to retain the special character focus and avoid modifying any development provisions which would not support the policy framework.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.038
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.025) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.025 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Support in part
Amend Figure 5.4.11e to provide clarity for plan users on the location of Outdoor Living Areas.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Figure 5.4.11 e) is accepted based on:
Support the intent of the Plan
Maintains the plan’s framework and workability
Provides plan users with a clear guidance of the intent of the associates provisions See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.056 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.11b) iv) and Figure 5.4.11e regarding outdoor living areas.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule b) iv) from Rule 5.4.11 and Figure 5.4.11 e) be rejected based on:
Does not support the intent of the Plan
Would not maintain the plan’s framework and workability
Would not provide a clear guidance of the intent of the Rule 5.4.11 The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflect those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly. It is important to retain the special character focus and avoid modifying any development
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 63 of 133
provisions which would not support the policy framework.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.018 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.11 in respect of Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.018
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.018) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.12 Service Areas
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.026 5.4.12 Service Areas Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.12 Service Areas in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.12 in respect of Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflect those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.039
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.026) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.019 5.4.12 Service Areas Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.12 in respect of Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflects those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.019
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.019) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.2 Site Coverage
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
John Elliott Stevenson
18.006 5.4.2 Site Coverage Support in part
Change site coverage for the Special Residential Zone, Clause 5.4.2 from 35% to 40%.
Reject The submission point seeking the change in the site coverage in Rule 5.4.2 is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices The provision relating to site coverage has been introduced from the Operative District Plan. As part of the development of the Hamilton East Residential Character Zone it was established that the existing site coverage was low. The intent of the reduced site coverage is to ensure that the current low density development that forms part of the character of these areas is retained.
The Adare Company Ltd
482.014 5.4.2 Site Coverage Support in part
Amend the tables for Rule 5.4.2 (Site Coverage) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone to read as follows: "Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns (Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area).
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the inclusion of a reference to the Peacocke Master Plan process in Rule 5.4.2 is accepted in part based on:
Would improve the administration of the Plan
Better located at the start of Rule 5.4
Support the intent of the Master Plan Process The standards along with the detail contained in the Peacocke Structure Plan are seen as a guideline for the preparation and assessment of the Master Plan. Accordingly, all the standards associated with the Peacocke Zone would be considered as criteria for the assessment of the Master Plan Process and then as standards after the Master Plan has been approved. Therefore, it is considered that the reference proposed by the submitter would be better located before Rule 5.4.1. Therefore reference has been included in Rule 5.4 linking the Standards to the Master Plan Process as assessment criteria as shown in the Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 64 of 133
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.009 5.4.2 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.2-12 in respect of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the change in the site coverage in Rule 5.4.2 with respect to Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflects those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.03
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.009 5.4.2 Site Coverage Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the change in the site coverage in Rule 5.4.2 with respect to Claudelands West is rejected based on:
Does not Support the intent of the Plan
Does not support the objectives and polices The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflects those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.01
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
John Elliott Stevenson
18.007 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting.
Reject The submission point seeking removal of 5.4.3 is rejected based on:
Would not ensure good on-site amenity,
The removal of the rule is not in accordance with Objectives and Policies Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and planting assists with the sustainability of the natural resources of the City by ensuring that a degree of stormwater runoff is recharged into the natural system rather than having all stormwater channeled through the public infrastructure (i.e. reticulated stormwater pipes and detention ponds).
The Adare Company Ltd
482.015 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Support in part
Amend the table in Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone to read as follows: "Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns (Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area) Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the inclusion of a reference to the Peacocke Master Plan process in Rule 5.4.3 is accepted in part based on:
Would improve the administration of the Plan
Better located at the start of Rule 5.4
Support the intent of the Master Plan Process See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Property Council New Zealand
938.050 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.3a) to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) to be planted in grass, shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures 5.4.3a and 4.4.3b.
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.3 is accepted in part based on:
Ensuring good on-site amenity,
Enabling wider flexibility as to how a resident can utilise the frontage of their site.
The suggested modifications are in accordance with Objectives and Policies. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 65 of 133
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Peter John Findlay, el-al(Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Peter John Findlay, el-al(Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Rotokauri Developments Ltd
1015.008 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.3. Permeable Surface and Planting by increasing area of front setback required to be planted in grass, shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.3 is accepted in part based on:
Ensuring good on-site amenity,
Enabling wider flexibility as to how a resident can utilise the frontage of their site.
The suggested modifications are in accordance with Objectives and Policies. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.017 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking removal of 5.4.3 is rejected based on:
Would not ensure good on-site amenity,
The removal of the rule is not in accordance with Objectives and Policies Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and planting assists with the sustainability of the natural resources of the City by ensuring that a degree of stormwater runoff is recharged into the natural system rather than having all stormwater channeled through the public infrastructure (i.e. reticulated stormwater pipes and detention ponds).
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.031
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.017) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.052 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Amend Rule 4.3 a) Permeable Surface and Planting to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) to be planted in grass, shrubs or trees AND consequential amendments to delete figure 5.4.3a and 4.4.3b.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.3 is accepted in part based on:
Ensuring good on-site amenity,
Enabling wider flexibility as to how a resident can utilise the frontage of their site.
The suggested modifications are in accordance with Objectives and Policies. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.010 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking removal of 5.4.3 is rejected based on:
Would not ensure good on-site amenity,
The removal of the rule is not in accordance with Objectives and Policies
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.011
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.010) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.4 Building Height
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups)
247.010 5.4.4 Building Height Support in part
Support 7m maximum building height in Claudelands West Special Residential Zone in Table 5.4.4. a. Amend Table 5.4.4b (Building height – Temple View and Peacocke Character Zones) so that it refers to 5.4.4a to correct an error.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.4 is accepted based on:
Supports the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
The Adare Company Ltd
482.016 5.4.4 Building Height Support in part
Amend the table in Rule 5.4.4 (Building Height) to include reference to the
Accept in part
The submission point seeking the inclusion of a reference to the Peacocke Master Plan process in Rule 5.4.4 is accepted in part based on:
Would improve the administration of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 66 of 133
Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Better located at the start of Rule 5.4
Support the intent of the Master Plan Process See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Janice Ann Verran 854.005 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4 Building Height to minimum of 1 storey.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.4.4 is rejected based on:
Relief sought is addressed in the plan
Max Walker Verran 855.004 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4. Building Height be amended to minimum of 1 storey.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to 5.4.4 is rejected based on:
Relief sought is addressed in the plan
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.025
Oppose Accept The submission point (855.004) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.018 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4 Building Height in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.4 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflect those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.032
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.018) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.009 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.4b) by increasing the maximum building height for the Stake Centre Precinct to 16m and correcting the reference to Rule 5.4.4a).
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.4 b) is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Accept The submission point (1201.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Accept The submission point (1201.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.007
Oppose Accept The submission point (1201.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.011 5.4.4 Building Height Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.4 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.012
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.011) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.019 5.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.5 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflects those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.033
Oppose Accept The submission point (1129.019) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 67 of 133
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.012 5.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.5 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character The development provisions set out in the PDP for the special character areas reflects those for general residential while having full regard to the specific character of the area and accommodating those accordingly.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.013
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.012) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
John Elliott Stevenson
18.008 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.6 a) to be the same as for the building setbacks rule in the General Residential zone (Rule 4.4.6); and Amend Rule 5.4.6c) to allow garages and carports facing a transport corridor to have a 0m setback.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Potential to impact on safety of the transport network.
Starship Trauma Service
182.020 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.6 a) and b) (Building Setbacks) so that the minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport be 6m (to accommodate one vehicle).
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Potential to impact on safety of the transport network. Overall the setback rules for the Special Character Zones reflect those set in the Operative District Plan along with the general rules set out in Chapter 4 Residential Zones in the proposed plan. To address the same issues raised in the Residential Chapter Council obtained expert transportation advice from Gray Matter Ltd. Gray Matter has advised that there needs to be sufficient space for vehicle queuing to ensure there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor of vehicles queuing or manoeuvring to access off street parking (i.e. in the residential setting access into a garage). A 6m queuing length ensures that a car can be parked with no impact on the transport corridor. However, it is important to also address setbacks to reflect the actual nature of the transport corridor, recognising the lower traffic volumes expected on these corridors. Gray Matter have also advised that the minimum 3m setbacks in the PDP would support the studies into driveway runovers which identify higher risks associated with long driveways and driveways existing onto local roads or cul-de-sacs. Nevertheless, Gray Matter has stated that the corridors that carry higher traffic volumes at higher speeds must have an increased queuing setback. 8m for garaging and 5m for all other buildings set in the PDP is therefore appropriate. The provisions regarding building setback within the Special Residential and Heritage Zones of the Special Character area are such to also ensure that the placement of garages does not negatively impact on the special character of these areas as well as ensuring that there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor. Accordingly, there is no need to alter the setbacks from a transportation corridor to maintain the community’s wellbeing.
Alexander Elliott (Claudelands Neighbourhood Support Groups)
247.007 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support Retain 5.4.6a (Building setbacks) in relation to Claudelands West.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is accepted based on:
Support the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Simon Puttick Friar 294.002 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks to make the setback for building facing a transport corridor 5m.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character Potential to impact on safety of the transport network
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.019
Oppose Accept The submission point (294.002) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
The Adare Company Ltd
482.017 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.6 (Building Setbacks) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accepted in part
The submission point seeking the inclusion of a reference to the Peacocke Master Plan process in Rule 5.4.6 is accepted in part based on:
Would improve the administration of the Plan
Better located at the start of Rule 5.4
Support the intent of the Master Plan Process See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Waikato Child and 1003.031 5.4.6 Building Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setback to Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is rejected based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 68 of 133
Youth Mortality Review Group
Setbacks reflect a minimum distance from transport corridor to front of garage or carport be 6m.
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Potential to impact on safety of the transport network. Overall the setback rules for the Special Character Zones reflect those set in the Operative District Plan along with the general rules set out in Chapter 4 Residential Zones in the proposed plan. To address the same issues raised in the Residential Chapter Council obtained expert transportation advice from Gray Matter Ltd. Gray Matter has advised that there needs to be sufficient space for vehicle queuing to ensure there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor of vehicles queuing or manoeuvring to access off street parking (i.e. in the residential setting access into a garage). A 6m queuing length ensures that a car can be parked with no impact on the transport corridor. However, it is important to also address setbacks to reflect the actual nature of the transport corridor, recognising the lower traffic volumes expected on these corridors. Gray Matter have also advised that the minimum 3m setbacks in the PDP would support the studies into driveway runovers which identify higher risks associated with long driveways and driveways existing onto local roads or cul-de-sacs. Nevertheless, Gray Matter has stated that the corridors that carry higher traffic volumes at higher speeds must have an increased queuing setback. 8m for garaging and 5m for all other buildings set in the PDP is therefore appropriate. The provisions regarding building setback within the Special Residential and Heritage Zones of the Special Character area are such to also ensure that the placement of garages does not negatively impact on the special character of these areas as well as ensuring that there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor. Accordingly, there is no need to alter the setbacks from a transportation corridor to maintain the community’s wellbeing.
Elizabeth de Jong 1010.003 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks, remove b).
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Potential to impact on safety of the transport network. Overall the setback rules for the Special Character Zones reflect those set in the Operative District Plan along with the general rules set out in Chapter 4 Residential Zones in the proposed plan. To address the same issues raised in the Residential Chapter Council obtained expert transportation advice from Gray Matter Ltd. Gray Matter has advised that there needs to be sufficient space for vehicle queuing to ensure there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor of vehicles queuing or manoeuvring to access off street parking (i.e. in the residential setting access into a garage). A 6m queuing length ensures that a car can be parked with no impact on the transport corridor. However, it is important to also address setbacks to reflect the actual nature of the transport corridor, recognising the lower traffic volumes expected on these corridors. Gray Matter have also advised that the minimum 3m setbacks in the PDP would support the studies into driveway runovers which identify higher risks associated with long driveways and driveways existing onto local roads or cul-de-sacs. Nevertheless, Gray Matter has stated that the corridors that carry higher traffic volumes at higher speeds must have an increased queuing setback. 8m for garaging and 5m for all other buildings set in the PDP is therefore appropriate. The provisions regarding building setback within the Special Residential and Heritage Zones of the Special Character area are such to also ensure that the placement of garages does not negatively impact on the special character of these areas as well as ensuring that there are no adverse effects on the transport corridor. Accordingly, there is no need to alter the setbacks from a transportation corridor to maintain the community’s wellbeing.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.020 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose Amend rules 5.4.6 Building Setback in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 in respect to Claudelands West Area is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.034
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.020) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.013 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.6 in respect to Claudelands West Area is rejected based on:
Opposes the intent of the objectives and policies for special character
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.014
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.020) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 69 of 133
Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd
30.003 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.7(b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private.
Accept in Part
The retention of Rule 5.4.7 in its modified form is important to ensure there is a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design that complements the public interface of the community without hindering individual design. The deletion of 5.4.7c) and d) address the concerns raised by submitters as to the actual ability for a solid door to convincingly promote for better passive surveillance and a safer community or the ability for individual preference to make a home individual. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Simon Puttick Friar 294.003 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private clause b).
Accept in Part
The retention of Rule 5.4.7 in its modified form is important to ensure there is a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design that complements the public interface of the community without hindering individual design. The deletion of 5.4.7c) and d) address the concerns raised by submitters as to the actual ability for a solid door to convincingly promote for better passive surveillance and a safer community or the ability for individual preference to make a home individual. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.02
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point (294.003) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
The Adare Company Ltd
482.018 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.7 (Interface Between Public and Private) as well as associated Figures.
Accept in Part
The retention of Rule 5.4.7 in its modified form is important to ensure there is a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design that complements the public interface of the community without hindering individual design. The deletion of 5.4.7c) and d) address the concerns raised by submitters as to the actual ability for a solid door to convincingly promote for better passive surveillance and a safer community or the ability for individual preference to make a home individual. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Property Council New Zealand
938.051 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.7b) to allow for garages to be located forward of the front building line where the wall facing the street consists of at least 20% glazed materials. Delete 4.4.7 c).
Accept in Part
The retention of Rule 5.4.7 in its modified form is important to ensure there is a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design that complements the public interface of the community without hindering individual design. The deletion of 5.4.7c) and d) address the concerns raised by submitters as to the actual ability for a solid door to convincingly promote for better passive surveillance and a safer community or the ability for individual preference to make a home individual. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Peter John Findlay, el al(Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.051.
Elizabeth de Jong 1010.002 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Remove b), e), and f) from rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Accept in Part
The retention of Rule 5.4.7 in its modified form is important to ensure there is a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design that complements the public interface of the community without hindering individual design. The deletion of 5.4.7c) and d) address the concerns raised by submitters as to the actual ability for a solid door to convincingly promote for better passive surveillance and a safer community or the ability for individual preference to make a home individual. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rotokauri Developments Ltd
1015.009 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Amend (b) of rule 5.4.7 to allow garages forwards of the dwelling and delete 5.4.7 (d).
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.7 is accepted based on:
Would provide a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design is accessible to all of the community.
Ensure the retention of the special character of the identified areas
Supports the Plan’s policy direction. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Hounsell Holdings Limited
FS248.002
Support Accept The submission point (1015.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Hamilton JV Investments Limited
FS254.005
Support Accept The submission point (1015.009) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 70 of 133
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.021 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Amend rules 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.7 is rejected based on:
Ensure the retention of the special character of the identified areas
Would be contrary to the Plan’s policy direction.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.035
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.021) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.024 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Support in part
Amend 5.4.7b) Interface Between Public and Private and the relevant assessment criteria to incorporate greater design flexibility for public/private interfaces.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.7 is accepted based on:
Would provide a suite of provisions to enable good quality urban design is accessible to all of the community.
Ensure the retention of the special character of the identified areas
Supports the Plan’s policy direction.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.053 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Amend 5.4.7(b) Interface Between Public and Private, to allow for garages to be located forward of the front building line where the wall facing the street consists of at least 20% glazed materials.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.7 b) and the deletion of 4.4.7 c) is accepted as it would:
Assist with the site development flexibility while ensuring the integrity of the Plan’s policy direction is maintained.
Support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.014 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.4.7 is rejected based on:
Ensure the retention of the special character of the identified areas
Would be contrary to the Plan’s policy direction.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.015
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.014) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.4.8 Fences and Walls Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
John Elliott Stevenson
18.009 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Ian Kenneth Bridge 231.005 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Delete Rule 5.4.8 c) Fences and Walls. Fences of a minimum height of 1.8m should be the rule for all open spaces adjacent to residences, schools, play-centres etc.
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
The Adare Company Ltd
482.019 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Remove Rule 5.4.8 (Fences and Walls) including associated figures. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Russelle Knaap 690.004 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Delete 5.4.8 Fences and Walls and retain provisions within Operative District Plan.
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Property Council New Zealand
938.052 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.8 a) regarding Fences and Walls by deleting reference to "boundary".
Accept in part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 71 of 133
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.052.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.052.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.052.
Elizabeth de Jong 1010.005 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Remove b) and c) i) from rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.022 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls in respect of the Claudelands West Area of the Special Residential Zone to provide for high density high rise residential development.
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.036
Oppose Accept in Part
FS286.036 is accepted as submission 1126.022 is accepted in part.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.054 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.4.8a) Fences and Walls by deleting the word "boundary".
Accept in part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.015 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Accept in Part
The modification of this rule by deleting all design and dimension provisions ensures people can provide for their individual visual privacy and acoustic mitigation.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.016
Oppose Accept in Part
FS286.016 is accepted as submission 1282.015 is accepted in part.
5.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Property Council New Zealand
938.053 5.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.9 Residential Building - Separation and Privacy - to allow for reduction in setback in certain circumstances as per the Operative District Plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.9 is rejected based on:
Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.053.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.053.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.053.
Claudelands 1126.023 5.4.9 Residential Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.9 is rejected based on:
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 72 of 133
Property Trust Buildings – Separation and Privacy
Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.037
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.023) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.055 5.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy
Oppose Amend Rule 5.4.9 Residential Building - Separation and Privacy - to allow for reduction in setback in certain circumstances as per the Operative District Plan.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.3 is rejected based on: Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.016 5.4.9 Residential Buildings – Separation and Privacy
Oppose Amend Rules 5.4.2 to 5.4.12 in the Special Residential Zone (Claudelands West) to provide for high density residential and mixed use development supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City, with high site coverage and small or no side yards.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.4.9 is rejected based on:
Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.017
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.016) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.5.10 Visitor Accommodation
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.011 5.5.10 Visitor Accommodation
Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.10 Visitor Accommodation.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.3 is rejected based on:
Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan The submitters have not provided any detail as to why they consider the visitor accommodation provisions are too restrictive, nor have they offered any alternative other than seeking the deletion of the rule. Deleting the rule in its entirety may be problematic. It is an activity listed in the activity list not only under Claudelands West but also within the other special character zones as either a discretionary or non-complying activity. And, if the rule was deleted there would be no guidance as to the acceptable parameters for the establishment of such a development within the special character zone, nor would there be any consistency in the establishment parameters for non-residential activities between those residential areas within the special character zones and the residential zones.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.041
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.011) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.013 5.5.10 Visitor Accommodation
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.10a) to remove the maximum occupancy for Visitor Accommodation in the Accommodation and Servicing Precinct of the Temple Comprehensive Development Plan area in Appendix 4, Figure 4-5.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.3 a) is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy
The submitters have not provided any detail as to why they consider the visitor accommodation provisions are too restrictive, nor have they offered any alternative other than seeking the deletion of the rule. Deleting the rule in its entirety may be problematic. It is an activity listed in the activity list not only under Claudelands West but also within the other special character zones as either a discretionary or non-complying activity. And, if the rule was deleted there would be no guidance as to the acceptable parameters for the establishment of such a development within the special character zone, nor would there be any consistency in the establishment parameters for non-residential activities between those residential areas within the special character zones and the residential zones.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject FS275.001 is not relevant to submission point 1201.013.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.021 5.5.10 Visitor Accommodation
Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.10 relating to Visitor Accommodation.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.3 is rejected based on:
Would be contrary to the objectives and policies of the Plan
The submitters have not provided any detail as to why they consider the visitor accommodation provisions are too restrictive, nor have they offered any
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 73 of 133
alternative other than seeking the deletion of the rule. Deleting the rule in its entirety may be problematic. It is an activity listed in the activity list not only under Claudelands West but also within the other special character zones as either a discretionary or non-complying activity. And, if the rule was deleted there would be no guidance as to the acceptable parameters for the establishment of such a development within the special character zone, nor would there be any consistency in the establishment parameters for non-residential activities between those residential areas within the special character zones and the residential zones.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.021
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.021) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.5.11 Retail activities within the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.020 5.5.11 Retail activities within the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone
Oppose Amend Rule (b) of 5.5.11 (Retail Activities within the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone) to only reference Business Zones 5 and 7. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Accept The submission seeking amendment to 5.5.11 is accepted as it would:
Improve the administration of the plan
Support the objectives and policies of the plan.
Be consistent with the intent of the Peacocke Structure Plan and Chapter 6 Business Zones.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
5.5.2 Childcare Facility Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.010 5.5.2 Childcare Facility
Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.2 Childcare Facilities Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.3 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.04
Oppose Accept The submission point (1126.010) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.020 5.5.2 Childcare Facility
Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.2 related to Childcare Facilities.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.3 a) is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.02
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.020) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
5.5.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary
Decision Reasoning
Robert W. Belbin 291.012 5.5.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.3a) (Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship) by increasing gross floor area of all buildings.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.3 a) is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy The section 32 analysis clearly identifies the need to limit the size to that similar to a large dwelling to maintain the character of the special character areas. The restriction on the size would also ensure that activities carried out on the site are appropriate with the surrounding character areas. Restricting the floor area of community facilities within the Character areas achieves the associated objectives by ensuring amenity and character is retained and that larger community facilities are located in more appropriate business or industrial zones. The submitters do not refer specifically to one of the Special Character areas however as development with Peacocke and Temple View are subject to either a Master Plan process or a Comprehensive Development Plan process (as a Discretionary Activity) the size of any community facility proposed would be assessed via either of these processes to determine the effects and appropriateness. Any proposed community facility outside of this process would need to be controlled to ensure that integrity of the Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan processes as well as ensuring the retention of the character of the area.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.016
Support Reject The submission point (291.012) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 74 of 133
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.026 5.5.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.5.3 c) of Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship with regards to hours and frequency of special events.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.3 c)is accepted based on:
Assist with the interpretation of Rule 5.5.3 and the general administration of the Plan. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.011 5.5.3 Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.3a) Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship, by increasing Maximum Gross Floor Area to 500m2.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.3 a) is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy The section 32 analysis clearly identifies the need to limit the size to that similar to a large dwelling to maintain the character of the special character areas. The restriction on the size would also ensure that activities carried out on the site are appropriate with the surrounding character areas. Restricting the floor area of community facilities within the Character areas achieves the associated objectives by ensuring amenity and character is retained and that larger community facilities are located in more appropriate business or industrial zones. The submitters do not refer specifically to one of the Special Character areas however as development with Peacocke and Temple View are subject to either a Master Plan process or a Comprehensive Development Plan process (as a Discretionary Activity) the size of any community facility proposed would be assessed via either of these processes to determine the effects and appropriateness. Any proposed community facility outside of this process would need to be controlled to ensure that integrity of the Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan processes as well as ensuring the retention of the character of the area.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject FS275.001 is not relevant to submission point 1201.011.
5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Robert W. Belbin 291.014 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 Home-based Business to include home -based professional services as Permitted.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.5 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
A key principle of the proposed plan is to ensure that a residential area is dominated by residential living which is why only the provision of small scale
business operations are permitted to enables people, who wish to establish a small scale business can do that from their residential site where they
actually reside. This also ensures that the size and scale of a home base business is managed along with the residential needs of the occupants, and fits
within the residential environment. And, in the Special character zones, Rule 5.5.5 sets out the parameters to ensure such an activity also does not impact
on the amenity found within the special character areas.
It is important to ensure that the business hierarchy approach of the plan is not eroded through leakage of business activities into the residential areas. This
has occurred in the past with detrimental effects on the business zoned areas of the City, along with eroding the residential amenity of some residential
areas, and including the amenity of the special character areas. Therefore, it is essential that the parameters for home-based business do not stray into a
more quasi business establishment on a residential site without being fully assessed against the objectives and policies of the plan
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.017
Support Reject The submission point (291.014) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.012 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5a) vi for Home-based Businesses to provide for professional services as a Permitted Activity.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.5 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
A key principle of the proposed plan is to ensure that a residential area is dominated by residential living which is why only the provision of small scale
business operations are permitted to enables people, who wish to establish a small scale business can do that from their residential site where they
actually reside. This also ensures that the size and scale of a home base business is managed along with the residential needs of the occupants, and fits
within the residential environment. And, in the Special character zones, Rule 5.5.5 sets out the parameters to ensure such an activity also does not impact
on the amenity found within the special character areas.
It is important to ensure that the business hierarchy approach of the plan is not eroded through leakage of business activities into the residential areas. This
has occurred in the past with detrimental effects on the business zoned areas of the City, along with eroding the residential amenity of some residential
areas, and including the amenity of the special character areas. Therefore, it is essential that the parameters for home-based business do not stray into a
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 75 of 133
more quasi business establishment on a residential site without being fully assessed against the objectives and policies of the plan.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject FS275.001 is not relevant to submission point 1201.012.
Property Council New Zealand
938.055 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 a) (i) relating to number of people allowed to be employed in a home-based business.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.5 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
A key principle of the proposed plan is to ensure that a residential area is dominated by residential living which is why only the provision of small scale
business operations are permitted to enables people, who wish to establish a small scale business can do that from their residential site where they
actually reside. This also ensures that the size and scale of a home base business is managed along with the residential needs of the occupants, and fits
within the residential environment. And, in the Special character zones, Rule 5.5.5 sets out the parameters to ensure such an activity also does not impact
on the amenity found within the special character areas.
It is important to ensure that the business hierarchy approach of the plan is not eroded through leakage of business activities into the residential areas. This
has occurred in the past with detrimental effects on the business zoned areas of the City, along with eroding the residential amenity of some residential
areas, and including the amenity of the special character areas. Therefore, it is essential that the parameters for home-based business do not stray into a
more quasi business establishment on a residential site without being fully assessed against the objectives and policies of the plan.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.055.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.055.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.055.
Hamilton Central Business Association
1115.005 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 (a) to allow for the employment of people other than people residing on the site.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.5 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
A key principle of the proposed plan is to ensure that a residential area is dominated by residential living which is why only the provision of small scale
business operations are permitted to enables people, who wish to establish a small scale business can do that from their residential site where they
actually reside. This also ensures that the size and scale of a home base business is managed along with the residential needs of the occupants, and fits
within the residential environment. And, in the Special character zones, Rule 5.5.5 sets out the parameters to ensure such an activity also does not impact
on the amenity found within the special character areas.
It is important to ensure that the business hierarchy approach of the plan is not eroded through leakage of business activities into the residential areas. This
has occurred in the past with detrimental effects on the business zoned areas of the City, along with eroding the residential amenity of some residential
areas, and including the amenity of the special character areas. Therefore, it is essential that the parameters for home-based business do not stray into a
more quasi business establishment on a residential site without being fully assessed against the objectives and policies of the plan.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.057 5.5.5 Home-based Businesses
Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.5 a) i) Home-based Businesses, by requiring at least one person, including the principal operator to reside on the site.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.5.5 is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
A key principle of the proposed plan is to ensure that a residential area is dominated by residential living which is why only the provision of small scale
business operations are permitted to enables people, who wish to establish a small scale business can do that from their residential site where they
actually reside. This also ensures that the size and scale of a home base business is managed along with the residential needs of the occupants, and fits
within the residential environment. And, in the Special character zones, Rule 5.5.5 sets out the parameters to ensure such an activity also does not impact
on the amenity found within the special character areas.
It is important to ensure that the business hierarchy approach of the plan is not eroded through leakage of business activities into the residential areas. This
has occurred in the past with detrimental effects on the business zoned areas of the City, along with eroding the residential amenity of some residential
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 76 of 133
areas, and including the amenity of the special character areas. Therefore, it is essential that the parameters for home-based business do not stray into a
more quasi business establishment on a residential site without being fully assessed against the objectives and policies of the plan.
5.5.8 Show Homes
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Property Council New Zealand
938.056 5.5.8 Show Homes Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.8 c) as no timeframe for the duration of a show home is necessary.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.8 c) is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP. It is recognised that show homes, especially in new subdivisions areas of either Special Natural Areas or Peacocke within the Special Character zones, are important for the marketing and sale of dwellings/sites in these areas. Nevertheless, with the overarching policy direction of the plan to ensure that the residential areas have only limited commercial activities the management of show homes is necessary. This is clearly outlined in the s.32 report which states that in considering the efficient and effectiveness of the Rule 5.5.8 its has been determined that the rule achieves objectives 5.2.1, 5.2.3 and 5.2.5 by: “ ensuring residential activities remain the dominant activity; activities are compatible with residential amenity; residential amenity is retained” Accordingly, to ensure the rule achieves the anticipated outcomes of those above mentioned objectives, is it important to manage the duration of a residential dwelling being used as a showhome. Therefore, although it is considered appropriate at the outset of the release of a new subdivision area to contain showhomes, it is not considered appropriate long term.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.056.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.056.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.056.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.058 5.5.8 Show Homes Oppose Delete Rule 5.5.8 a) iii) relating to Show Homes.
Reject The submission point seeking the deletion of Rule 5.5.8 a) iii is rejected based on:
The amendments sought are contrary to the policy direction of the PDP.
5.5.9 Rest Homes
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Property Council New Zealand
938.057 5.5.9 Rest Homes Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.9c) to specify what the individual minimum outdoor living requirements area is.
Accept in Part
The amendment sought will assist with plan administration.
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.057.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.057.
Peter John Findlay, el al(Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.057.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.027 5.5.9 Rest Homes Support in part
Amend 5.5.9 d) Rest Homes, to clarify that outdoor living shall be provided communally.
Accept The amendment sought would assist in the administration of the PDP. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.059 5.5.9 Rest Homes Oppose Amend Rule 5.5.9 c) Rest Homes, to specify outdoor living area requirements.
Accept in Part
The amendment sought would assist in the administration of the PDP.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 77 of 133
5 Special Character Zones
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.021 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria
Oppose Amend Rule a) (xxxvii) in 5.6 (Restricted Discretionary Activities: Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria) to delete I24 and re-number it ZA9 (to reflect renumbering requested under separate submission point to remove Peacocke area from the Heritage heading umbrella), and to delete point F3 (relating to a Centre Vitality Assessment Report).
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.6 is accepted based on:
Would assist in the administration of the PDP.
See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
New Zealand Transport Agency
924.044 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria
Support in part
Amend matters of discretion in Rule 5.6 (Special Character Zones) relating to any sensitive activity to include reverse sensitivity assessment criteria, and amend the following activities xx, xxvi, xxvii – xxxii, xxxv – xxxvii within Rule 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to include transportation assessment criteria.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.6 is rejected based on:
would not provide any benefit to the administration of the Plan
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.022
Oppose Accept The submission point (924.044) to which the further submission relates has been rejected.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.012 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria
Oppose Delete Rule 5.6. Add new text to incorporate the full text of relevant matters of discretion. Amend Chapter 5 to make childcare centres and restaurants permitted activities.
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.6 is rejected based on:
would not provide any benefit to the administration of the Plan
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.022 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria
Oppose Replace Rule 5.6 (and equivalent rules in other chapters) with new text to incorporate the full text of relevant matters of discretion. Amend Rule 5.3 that childcare centres and restaurants are Permitted Activities and convert relevant matters from Rule 5.6 into development standards in Rule 5.4. Amend Rule 5.6 to clarify all matters of discretion that are not clearly definable and do not have defined outcomes, reconsider the matters of discretion on urban design, with a view to simplifying the approach, reducing jargon, and clarifying the practical outcomes sought and retain only the matters of discretion that are necessary to give effect to objectives and policies.
Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.6 is rejected based on:
would not provide any benefit to the administration of the Plan The activity status for non residential activities within the Character zones are reflective of those in the Residential zones to ensure consistency and intent with the overall business hierarchy approach of the proposed plan and the ensure the predominant activity in these zones is residential. See Decisions for Appendix 1 Assessment Criteria
Generation Zero Waikato
1284.013 5.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria
Support in part
Amend Rule 5.6a) xxiv so that C9, C20, J1, P4, R7, R9 and S1 are relevant matters for new building and development not complying with Rule 5.4.10f). Amend Rule 5.6a) i to x so that
Reject The submission point seeking the amendment to Rule 5.6 is rejected based on:
Would not provide any benefit to the administration of the Plan
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 78 of 133
S1 and P4 are relevant matters.
490 Grey Ltd as the Trustee of the BDL Commercial Investment Trust and Homes for Living Ltd
FS266.005
Oppose Reject FS266.005 is not relevant to submission point 1284.013.
5.7 Notification Rule
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Robert W. Belbin 291.015 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Amend Rule 5.7 Notification Rule by making notification of and approval from affected persons a requirement.
Reject The submission seeking the amendment Rule 5.7 is reject ted as it would:
Not support the intent of the plan Chapter 1 Rule 1.1.9 sets out that unless otherwise stated in the District Plan the notification provisions of the RMA apply. Rule 19.6 in Chapter 19 identifies a number of Restricted Discretionary activities that will be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Decisions on Chapter 1: Plan Over view has resulted in the ruling 1.1.9 be amended to allow the consideration of identified parties as potential affected parties’ regardless if the provisions state that no notification or neighbours consent is required. It is considered that these amendments address the concerns raised by submitters.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
FS180.018
Oppose Accept The submission point which FS180.018 opposes was been rejected.
The Adare Company Ltd
FS272.002
Oppose Accept The submission point which FS272.002 opposes was been rejected.
Property Council New Zealand
938.058 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 (District Plan Administration) with a view of streamlining and simplifying.
See Decisions for Appendix 1 Assessment Criteria
Andrew Yeoman FS2.012
Support Reject FS2.012 is not relevant to submission point 938.058.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Baruchel Developments Ltd)
FS242.001
Support Reject FS242.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.058.
Peter John Findlay, el al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd)
FS277.001
Support Reject FS277.001 is not relevant to submission point 938.058.
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.013 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 5.7 Notification Rule and include a rule containing a clear statement under s77D of the RMA specifying the activities for which notification is required.
Reject The submission seeking the deletion of Rule 5.7 is rejected as it would:
Not support the intent of the plan Chapter 1 Rule 1.1.9 sets out that unless otherwise stated in the District Plan the notification provisions of the RMA apply. Rule 19.6 in Chapter 19 identifies a number of Restricted Discretionary activities that will be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Decisions on Chapter 1: Plan Over view has resulted in the ruling 1.1.9 be amended to allow the consideration of identified parties as potential affected parties’ regardless if the provisions state that no notification or neighbours consent is required. It is considered that these amendments address the concerns raised by submitters.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.042
Oppose Accept The submission point which FS286.042 opposes was been rejected.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.014 5.7 Notification Rule Support Retain Rule 5.7 Notification Rule. Accept The submission seeking the retention of Rule 5.7 is accepted as it would:
Support the intent of the plan Chapter 1 Rule 1.1.9 sets out that unless otherwise stated in the District Plan the notification provisions of the RMA apply. Rule 19.6 in Chapter 19 identifies a number of Restricted Discretionary activities that will be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Decisions on Chapter 1: Plan Over view has resulted in the ruling 1.1.9 be amended to allow the consideration of identified parties as potential affected parties’
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 79 of 133
regardless if the provisions state that no notification or neighbours consent is required. It is considered that these amendments address the concerns raised by submitters.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject FS275.001 is not relevant to submission point 1201.014.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Reject The submission point which FS279.001 opposes was been accepted.
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.009
Oppose Reject The submission point which FS284.009 opposes was been accepted.
McCracken Surveys Limited
1206.060 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Oppose Rule 5.7 Notification. Reject The submission seeking the review of Volume 2, Appendix 1be referred.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.023 5.7 Notification Rule Oppose Delete Rule 5.7 Notification Rule and substitute a rule containing a clear statement under s77D of the Resource Management Act specifying the activities for which the council - (a) must give public notification of an application for a resource consent: (b) is precluded from giving public notification of an application for a resource consent: (c) is precluded from giving limited notification of an application for a resource consent.
Reject The submission seeking the deletion of Rule 5.7 is reject ted as it would:
Not support the intent of the plan Chapter 1 Rule 1.1.9 sets out that unless otherwise stated in the District Plan the notification provisions of the RMA apply. Rule 19.6 in Chapter 19 identifies a number of Restricted Discretionary activities that will be considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons. Decisions on Chapter 1: Plan Over view has resulted in the ruling 1.1.9 be amended to allow the consideration of identified parties as potential affected parties’ regardless if the provisions state that no notification or neighbours consent is required. It is considered that these amendments address the concerns raised by submitters.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.022
Oppose Accept The submission point which FS286.005 opposes was been accepted in part.
Features Map
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.003 Features Map 37B Oppose Amend Map 37B to exclude existing business and medium density residential development from Claudelands West Area.
Accept in Part
The submission seeking the amendment to the Claudelands West Area boundary is accepted in part as it would:
Support the intent of the objectives and policies
Ensure the protection of the special character in Claudelands West
Better reflect the character of the area along Grey Street See Tracked Changes for Appendix 17.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.003
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point which FS286.005 opposes was been accepted in part.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and Claudelands Property Trust
1282.003 Features Map 37B Oppose Amend Map 37B to exclude from the Claudelands West Area the sites of existing businesses and medium density residential development. In particular exclude 729, 731, and 737 Grey St from the Claudelands West Area.
Accept in Part
The submission seeking the amendment to the Claudelands West Area boundary is accepted in part as it would:
Support the intent of the objectives and policies
Ensure the protection of the special character in Claudelands West
Better reflect the character of the area along Grey Street
See Tracked Changes for Appendix 17.
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.005
Oppose Accept in Part
The submission point which FS286.005 opposes was been accepted in part.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.142 Features Map 43B Support in part
Amend Features Map 43B to include 'Railway Park' (Lot 1 DP S37471) as part of the Frankton Railway village. Also,
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Features Map 43B is accepted as this would:
Improve the administration of the plan.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 80 of 133
add Flood Hazard Areas to parts of Empire and High Streets (transport corridor only).
See Tracked Changes for Appendix 17.
Barry Harris (Hamilton City Council)
1146.146 Features Map 45B Support in part
Rezone to Business 7 Zone on the corner of Jellicoe Drive and Plunkett Terrace into the Hayes Paddock Special Heritage Zone.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Features Map 45B is accepted as this would:
Improve the administration of the plan. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 17.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.020 Features Map 60B Support Retain Features Map 60B as it relates to Temple View.
Accept The submission seeking the retention of Features Map 60 as it relates to Temple View is accepted as this:
Supports the intent of the Objectives and Polices of the plan
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The future submission point FS 275.001 does not relate to the submission ant therefore is out of scope.
Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Claire Millington 65.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ukinga AkaitiPonga
66.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Delma Murray-Macgregor
67.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jodhi Vanessa Ponga
68.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jill Atkinson 89.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Matthew Shane Watene
90.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Duane Skyes 91.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shawney mei Atarangi Kahi
92.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Myles Aidan Tipene Watene
93.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Susan Pahuru 94.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 81 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Neesha Pahuru 95.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gabrielle Wilson 96.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Aroha Pahuru 97.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rosemary Gordon 98.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Janine Mere Siteine
99.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Herangi Searancke
100.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Moses Christopher Armstrong (CCNZ Alumni President)
101.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tessa Siteine 102.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Justin Sonnenberg 103.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Andy Lee 104.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Myles Watene 105.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Stacey Scirkovich 106.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vanessa Armstrong
107.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 82 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Ora Neill Kohe 108.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alma Ruth Paewai Kohe
109.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Merieanna Graham
110.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kareve Harata Witehira
111.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lady King 112.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Maria Koroheke 113.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tuini Koroheke 114.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kara Ivy Witehira 115.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kare Eva Pompey 116.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gwen Kepa 117.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Katarina Koroheke 118.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Arthur Tupou Hettig
119.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kiritahi Koroheke 120.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 83 of 133
Terekia Rewiki James Koroheke
121.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Kieran Hettig 122.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tau Moeke 123.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Heinrich Hettig 124.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lahaina Moeke 125.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Michael Wilson 126.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Elletta Rachel Hettig
127.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tainan Evarn Watene
128.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rebecca Cutler 129.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Renata Immanuel Kahuroa
130.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Devonshire (Te Wharekura Rakaumanga)
131.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Quintin Glenford Hapuku
132.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rebecca Hapuku 133.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Edwin Skinner 134.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 84 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gavin Talmage Joseph Scirkovich
135.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Natalie Renee McNamara
136.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pera Ratana 137.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Billy Grey 138.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Khan Major 139.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pawhaure Brown 140.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pania Waikai 141.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
R Henry 142.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jonelle Henry 143.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Renata Whitley 144.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rave Anthony 145.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tirohia Smith 146.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Flu Waikai 147.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 85 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Herawini Rangi (Taniwharau Rugby League Club)
148.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Neil T Rose 149.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Misty Kama 150.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pera Paeka 151.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Laisa Kama 152.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jackson Robin Takiari (Te Iti Rearea RLC)
153.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Senae Mitchell 154.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Colin John Jowles (INwork NZ)
155.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Stuart Poulava 156.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kimberly Rose 157.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Yvette K Rose 158.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ray Bourne (Waikato Referees Association)
159.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Awa Anderson 160.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 86 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Leonard Reid (NZRL)
161.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Zoram Watene 162.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Waimarie Hare (Tigers)
163.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Willy Beazley 164.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jaden Paekan 165.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
TeUranga Waikou 166.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sash Stosic (Upper Central Zone of NZRL Inc.)
167.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Baz Paama 168.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robert W. Belbin 291.022 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jodi N. Belbin 298.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Grace McCarthy 302.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kenneth F Alexander
384.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose A directive be issued for all building demolition in Temple View be halted until the Ngapuhi heritage submission is fully investigated.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lenna Maria Alexander
385.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 87 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Jason Brown 386.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Murray Keith McDonald
387.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robyn & Rodney Dallin
388.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Michael Seth Rose 389.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ewen Macdonald 390.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Manu Waa 391.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Cherry Wainer 392.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Greg Harmeling 393.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ricky Shurtz 394.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mandy Bishop 395.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Fred H Hughes 396.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynn Shomers 397.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ernie Ritz 398.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 88 of 133
Sarah Shurtz 399.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nakeya Quezada (Ez-Pawn)
400.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tony Matthews (Tracvity)
401.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rebecca Harris 402.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Fannie Ritz 403.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Missy Shurtz 404.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Evangeline Donlon 405.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Francis Fitzpatrick 407.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jared Vaughan Ormsby
408.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dean Westerlund 409.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Maroni John Westerlund
410.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Glenn Burgess 411.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jeff Nikoia 412.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Harry Peter 413.004 Figure 4-5 Temple Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 89 of 133
Gaastra (Taranaki District)
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mark Green 414.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jody Walters 415.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Toni Elkington 416.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dale Pateriki Anderson
417.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vicky Shurtz 420.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kim Shurtz 421.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Diana Shurtz 422.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Linda Shurtz 423.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robert Christmas (M&R)
424.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jeff Bartholomew 425.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joyce Brock 426.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dolores Barnhill 427.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Esteban Tirado 428.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 90 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Amanda Sue Ruiz (Tracvity)
429.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charles Wallace Jr 430.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Paul Raymond Clever
431.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Talbot T Snow 432.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Don Childers 433.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Margaret Corina Sosa
434.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Edward Garza 435.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Elizabeth Costanzo 436.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Christopher Simmerman
437.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Michelle Lyon 438.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Steve Easley 439.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rhonda O'Hearon 440.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rosie Ibarra 441.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 91 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Veronica Gaiza 442.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Luis Garcia 443.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Elbert Brown 444.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John G Hughes 445.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Juliah Albulet 446.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jane Macdonald 447.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vilma McCreadie 448.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peter George McCheyne
449.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynette Ann McCheyne
450.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lesley Lomas 451.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shea Margaret Lawrence
452.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Suzanne Kyd 453.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Trevor- Charles Te Metera Kohu
454.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 92 of 133
Jordan Kiro 455.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Miriama Kingi 456.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ina Margaret Kilburn
457.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kylie Hohaia 458.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Jordan Herbert
459.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Colene Herbert 460.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Yana Leah Hemi 461.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Richard Grant Herewini
462.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Roimata Hazel Hall 463.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kingi Dennis 464.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jane Griffin 465.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Whare Dewes 466.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mylee Gordon 467.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Heidi-Anna Ruth 468.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 93 of 133
Gordon View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rewa Pahemata Ruthina Tipu Dewes
469.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Keaohiwahiwaofaluanui Kelsey Daniels
470.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jordan Dennis 471.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hillary Daniels 472.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Benjamin Dean Bryers
474.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kellie Brown 475.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mark Bramley 476.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Christine Bradley 477.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Colin Leslie Bradley 478.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hemi Arthur 479.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Yorana Arthur 480.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bruce Gordon 483.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Figure 4.5:Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts - as set out in the submission: Seeks the recognition of the significant historical, religious, educational, social, and cultural values of the Temple View
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 94 of 133
community as a whole; Delete reference to Temple View Character Area and replace with a Heritage precinct; Recognise that there has been and still is an implicit social contract between the Church and the community in Temple View; The Envision Team/developers need to repurpose all of the current Campus buildings and housing as part of a Heritage precinct.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in part
The submission point (483.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Mectildah Chikwiri 484.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peter O'Donnell 485.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mary Jefferson 486.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tracey Bell 487.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Craig Ormond 488.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Warren Salon 489.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ernie Le Heron 490.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kasey McCarty 491.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Debra Phillip 492.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rob Jacobs 493.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 95 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Pauline Gaudin 494.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robert E Rihehert 495.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Huiariki Watene 496.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Brian D Joyce 497.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jocelyn Gush 498.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nikeita Campbell 499.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Herani Ware 500.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ora Going Richardson
501.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vatia Toetagata (Auckland Council)
502.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ota Tuaen (Te Wananga)
503.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kevin Kewena Tamahou
504.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Margaret Kahui 505.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Francis Peri Adams 506.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 96 of 133
Charles Sunnex 507.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Andrew Kelvin James
508.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Cedric T Kingi Ngarotata
509.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
David Robert Searle
510.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wendy Joy Sales 511.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Murdoch Jason Tahere
512.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Zan Te Wakaiti Southon
513.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nicola Hamon 514.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Takiri Zan Southon 515.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rutha Lucy Southon
516.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sydney Taka Smith 517.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tina Ann Rose-Dutton
518.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jackie Macdonald 519.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ammon Kerry 520.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 97 of 133
Shaun Preiss Rose View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Deane Pinny 521.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Phillip Shane Ikunui Rose
522.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kelly Pere 523.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Audrey Pere 524.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Terina Lee Nin 525.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tahir Loy Nin 526.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rosina Aliana Nin 527.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Daphne Parsons 528.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ally Turner 529.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Transfield 530.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pania Lee Nin 531.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Annitta Nin 532.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Yi Li 533.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 98 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shui Li 534.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Zhuoying Shi 535.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Maraea Mita 536.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pamela Joy McLanachan
537.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Yi Li 538.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts; Do not allow any more shops in Temple View.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bruce William Gordon
FS258.001
Support Accept in part
The submission point (538.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in part
The submission point (538.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Dorothy Betty Belbin
544.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lisa-Marie Watene 545.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Carol Anne Allan 546.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tashena Marie Waru
547.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Cheyanne Alys Southon
548.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lennox James Southon
549.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Daniel Rei Nin 550.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 99 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jasmine Tunstall 551.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Emma Watene 552.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tipare Wharepapa 553.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Adele Wirepa 554.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Arnold David Stoneley
555.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shannon Asalele Ta'ala
556.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kimberley Ruth Tahere
557.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Colleen Taylor 558.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
George Tenwolde 559.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jamaal Tuia 560.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lucy Tuia 561.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Errin Jay Nin 562.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wallace Raiti Peter Reihana
563.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 100 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Amanda Smiler 564.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kristen Smith 565.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Brenda Price 566.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rebecca Nonoa 567.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rachael Nonoa 568.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kasmin Joy Nikora 569.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ashley Nikora 570.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Folau Paea Tukanua Ngaw
571.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kerianne Moana Newman
576.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alfreda Olive Marshall
578.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marama Karen Leslie Marshall
579.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hamish Paul McArthur
580.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Megan Rona Kaho 582.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 101 of 133
Denise Howell 584.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jamie Hemi 585.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jo Leah Takuna Hemi-Nicholson
586.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Apikara Hemi 587.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ripeka C Fruean 588.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Apihei Hemi 589.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Otis J Fruean 590.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nathaniel Beets 591.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Richard Grey-Edwards
592.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kimberley Beets 593.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
James Enoka Tapsell
594.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Carolyn Suzan Nin 611.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bruce William Gordon
FS258.002
Support Accept in part
The submission point (611.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in part
The submission point (611.001) to which the further submission relates has been accepted in part.
Cherie Clark 613.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 102 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Seanna Carlile-Clark
614.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dale Clark 616.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dean Gauthern 618.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Carly Gauthern 619.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ariane Emma & Stephen Keola Josephs
621.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vivienne Shona Evelyn Cammock
622.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tasi Ann Cammock 623.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charlotte Cammock
624.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Conway Tarawhiti Bradley
625.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tania Rangirangi Mariana Enoka
626.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mavis Ruth Duncan
627.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lloyd Elder Duncan 628.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Julienne Elizabeth Duncan
636.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 103 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Susan Cribb 637.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
David Anthony Pazi-Cope (Blackout Electrical)
638.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Aimee Carlile-Clark 639.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shane Carlile 640.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gaylynn Leigh Tunstall
641.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Valerie Clark 642.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kevin Harold Tunstall
643.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Theresa Albert (Granddaughter of labour missionary)
644.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Margaret Watene (College Old Bous Rugby League Charitable Trust)
645.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peti Hinewetea Transfield
646.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Linda Ormsby 647.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jaimee Davies 648.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Luke Ormsby 649.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 104 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Ralph Roland Hamon
650.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lindsay Hixon Hamon
651.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sherrill Macdonald Hamon
652.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Janna June Margaret Fesolai
653.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jared Worth Pease 654.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Amelia Edith Pearse
655.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nathan Graeme Hamon
656.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robert Gordon 657.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Isaac Roland Hamon
658.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Belinda R Albulet 659.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Heather Hine (Tracvity)
660.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Katanna Green (Tracvity)
661.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joshua Montomery (Dollar Flash)
662.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 105 of 133
Corey Dunham 663.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mellissa Castello 664.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joy Jackson (Dollar Flash)
665.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Walter Kevin Ware 666.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kevin Matthew Wenz
667.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kenneth Rasor 668.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Neil Westerlund Jr
669.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marina Jane Westerlund
670.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nihe Matilda Warwick
672.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lisa Wilson 673.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shaun Eketona 674.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Richard Herbig 675.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Meri Blakey 676.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Paulette Leef 677.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 106 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charmaine Walker-Eketone
678.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ryan Stacey Harris 679.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lani Awhimai Michele Emery
680.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Maroea Gaylene Harris
681.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rakaipaka Harris 682.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alysha Ann Reti 683.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Penni-Marie Harris 684.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rinaira Gaylene Horsford
685.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Renaira Gaylene Harris
686.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ra Harris 687.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sean Harris 688.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sharen Reti 689.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kel Ormsby 699.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 107 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Carl Ormsby 700.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vincent Matthew Heke
710.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nathalie Lordemans
711.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Darren Siteine 712.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sherry Watene 713.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ike Ihaka Ormsby 715.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Malakai Watene-Zelezniak (College Old Boys Rugby League)
716.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lee-anne Paama (COB League)
717.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Britani Watene-Zelezniak
718.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alexandra Randell 719.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rawiri Wayne King 720.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lucinda Atkinson 721.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jeremy Atkinson 722.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 108 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Dora Ballantyne 723.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Patrice Marama Arkins
724.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tara Elissa Arkins 725.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Clarissa Charlotte Arkins
726.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jonathon William Arkins
727.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Richard Thomas Arkins
728.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Samuel Whiteford Arkins
729.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bethanie Jane Smith
730.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bruce William Arkins
731.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Penelope Jane Arkins
732.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Debbie Lorraine Neilson
734.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joanne Vowles 735.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alfa Blondy Kepu (Youth Justice North-Korowai & Manaaki, CYFS)
736.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 109 of 133
Kerryn Etika 737.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Summer Kershaw 738.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ngamhe Te Amo 740.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Barry Dean Clark 741.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Neesha Pahuru 742.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mike Burton 743.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Chris Thompson 744.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support in part
Figure 4-5: Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts - Seek controls over certain retail and recreational activities occurring on the former CCNZ campus through the introduction of specific planning provisions/overlays by : - prohibiting the sale of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products; - prohibiting all Sunday Trading and Sunday Play (organised sports practices and games on Sunday); - prohibiting all gambling including housie, lotto, raffles, pokies, scratches etc and the building of casinos; - restrict Sunday Activities on the former CCNZ campus area to quiet family-type activities (which is in keeping with the current special character of the area where Sunday is treated as a day of rest, for families to spend time together while engaging in quiet family time).
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Courtney Skinner 746.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pamela Umuhozu 747.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 110 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Leilani Uili 748.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Myles Watene 749.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Westly Te haki Howard
750.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Raechel Anne Popping
751.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Casey Clarke 752.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Samuel Nowacki 753.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jackie Noki Tainui 754.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jake Wheki 755.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Michaela Powell 756.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Randall Tannea Kite
757.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Channeary Yean 758.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peter Clarke 759.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Philip Siteine 760.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 111 of 133
Brandon Kipa 765.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Christine L Forbes 766.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joseph Hans Hartog
767.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Matthew Lester Simon
768.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marilyn Bigland 770.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Cyril Gudeeon 773.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lillian Singers 774.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Barbara Reneti 775.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Stephen Reneti 776.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Reihana Patrick Nuku
778.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Terry Snipler 781.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mark Metekingi 786.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ariel Piripi Metekingi
787.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nigel Ballantyne 788.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 112 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Aaron Atkinson 789.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Philip Ballantyne 790.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Melanie Ballantyne
792.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marilyn Cecil Hayward
794.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tanya Lisa Whitehead
795.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Fiona Maxine Greenwood
796.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Justin Greenwood 798.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lisa Jayne Bust 803.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Aaron Dixon 804.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hinemoa Peke-Manawaiti
805.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Levi-Che Ngawaka 807.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Erana Roa 809.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Malaea Cossey 810.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 113 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precinct. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Waihanea Katarina Timu
811.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sheree Fryer 812.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
O. Raihania Timu 813.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynnette Vincent 815.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
George Hape Chase
816.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peni Rachel Golder 817.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kay Warrender 818.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Delaine & Cyril Gudgeon
819.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sherry Te Amohaere Watene
820.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Suzanne Ings 821.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jarom Gudgeon 823.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jenny Jenkins 824.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ruth Robinson (Nemesys Ltd)
826.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 114 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Myles Aidan Watene
828.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Eric Oler 829.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gretchen Cume 830.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jamey Etika 833.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Eddie Willison 834.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Richard Grant Herewini
836.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Baz Paama 837.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wayne Rogers 919.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Anthony Shaun Wilson
930.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Guy Anthony Perrett
933.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pauline Norma O'Brien
936.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Estonie Jean Funaki
939.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
E'stonie Jean Petersen
942.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 115 of 133
Bruce Alafoki Kaufana
944.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Heather Margaret Kaufana
947.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jared Edward Coromandel
948.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Fay Ataarahiora Coromandel
950.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
David Edward Coromandel
952.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
IFan Wu 954.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Airini Forbes 956.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lei Sarkovich 964.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Boyd Sarkovich 965.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Gavin Sarkovich 969.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Patsy Karene 970.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wero Karena 971.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Holly Lin 973.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
College Old Boys 974.002 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose the inclusion of the map Figure Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 116 of 133
Rugby League Club View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts along with the activities being proposed within each of the Areas/Precincts; Seeks the creation of a 'Smoke Free, Alcohol Free, and No Sunday Trade/Play Precinct' over the entire Church College Campus and Temple grounds; Seeks the zoning of the current sports ground, grandstand and hilled area be recreational.
part Reject Reject
See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4. The submission point seeking the creation of a smoke Free, Alcohol Free area over the entire Church College Campus is rejected based on:
Outsde the scope of the 1st
Schedule process and cannot be considered as part of the District Plan The submission seeking the rezoning of the sports fields be rejected based on:
Contrary to the intent of the objectives and policies
Better dealt with through the Comprehensive Development Plan process
Karen Hoki Parker 975.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jay R Illsley 980.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tyrone Jade Kareitiana
982.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Soleil McDonald 983.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Desmond Hetiri Te Tuhi
985.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tahuata Nelson Minhinnick
986.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ron Phillips 987.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Toni Swney 988.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bethenee Witt 989.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Reremoana Nelson
990.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 117 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Carol Turahui 991.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pierce Isaac Te Ngakau Te Moni
992.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Duane Sykes (C.O.B. Rugby League)
993.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Eleni Tuitama (C.O.B. Rugby League)
994.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Darren Siteine 995.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Stephanie Phillips 996.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Patrick Taitoko 997.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lavinia Maria Taitoko
998.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynette Ramari Kauluwehi
999.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Erina Dee & Tony Osborne
1000.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Daniel Parker 1001.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tony Elkington 1028.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John A Kendall 1029.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 118 of 133
Megan Kendall 1031.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
The Errol John Kendall Family -
1033.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rei Kendall (Kendall Family)
1034.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jenna Walmsley 1035.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alby Tate (The Lost Tribe)
1036.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joe Hay (Hay Family)
1037.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Waata R Greening
1038.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Matai Christian Parata Family
1039.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Susan Elizabeth Thomson
1041.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Colby Osborne 1042.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Anton Osborne 1043.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kendall Graham 1044.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Romana Graham 1045.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Vicki Wihongi 1046.004 Figure 4-5 Temple Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 119 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ashton Frew 1047.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pamela Mabel Heremaia
1048.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kylie Michelle Birks
1049.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Helen Judith Thomson
1052.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rebecca Hippolite 1053.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alexandra Dee 1054.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Julie Nicole Morley 1055.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Velroy Crystal Matthews
1056.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Celeste Sarah Judith Mulipola
1057.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ann Bella Johnson 1058.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Moana Adalene Malissa Rarere
1060.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alan Francis Thomson
1061.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ariana Murphy 1062.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 120 of 133
Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Areas and Precincts. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Darnie Eden Paraha
1063.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rachel Elizabeth Thomson
1064.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Debbie Solomon 1065.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Alisha Willis 1066.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marsden Boyd Gaabdora
1067.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dave Hurae Moeke 1068.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mikala T Watene 1069.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Harrisson Balabat Jull
1070.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Emmeline Sunnex 1071.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
William Kent Money (Envision Team)
1072.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ruth Lynne Hamon 1073.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Amanda Gayle Watts (Auckland Central Facilities Management)
1074.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Garrick Wayne Parr
1075.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 121 of 133
Areas and Precincts
Owen Purcell 1076.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Noeleen Blanche Forbes
1077.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
George Kaka 1078.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Janie Edwards 1079.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku Briggs
1080.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peter Marere Kaio Mete-Smith
1081.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lincoln Ivan Reid 1082.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tripoli Daniel Tuau 1084.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Shirley T Rago 1085.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peihana Owen 1086.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Edna Mabel Johnson
1087.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
R Andrew Joseph 1088.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marie Pere Joseph 1089.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 122 of 133
Kristen Hartley 1090.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Deborah Leigh Brunton
1091.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ken Williams 1092.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jill Patricia Tuau 1093.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Brian Smith (Spotswood)
1095.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Marama Mete 1096.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Roena McCarthy 1097.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hata Puriri (Temple View Heritage Society)
1098.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Amend 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area by including the area into the Temple Heritage Precinct. Add Historic heritage to the list of information requirements for those parties preparing Comprehensive Development Plans in order to ensure that applicants are aware of the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources. Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts. Seeks Council to ask the owners to make the changes to the David O McKay building that will enable it to be repurposed as a Stake Centre. Seeks Council to ensure that the owners of the buildings and their representatives, “take all reasonable and proper care to keep in a state of good order and repair all buildings and
Reject Reject Accept in part Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the deletion of Figure 4-5 and amendment to the PDP to elevate Temple View Character Area to a Heritage Area is rejected based on:
Contrary to the intent of the objectives and policies of the Plan
The existing application of Heritage and character mechanism in the plan is in accordance with Section 6 of the RMA,
The amendments proposed to 5.1.4.2 that assists with the submitter’s concerns over it being overly descriptive. Historic Heritage is dealt with under Chapter 19. The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4. The submission point seeking preservation of the David O Mckay Building is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking owners to take care of buildings is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 123 of 133
other permanent improvements forming part of the Board's property”. Seeks Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can be repurposed. Seeks the rezoning of the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd that is currently zoned ‘future residential’ as residential. Seeks Council to encourage the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community organisations regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds. Opposes changes to Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and additional landscaping.
Reject Reject Reject Reject
The submission point seeking owners to consult with community is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking rezoning of land for future residential is rejected based on:
Better done through the development of a structure plan. The submission point seeking owners to consider requests of local sports groups is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process. The submission point seeking council not approve changes to roading is rejected based on:
Out side scope of 1st
schedule process.
Alice Brown-Haenga
1100.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ringihia Te Aroha Watene
1101.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charlotte W Timu 1102.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1103.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Annetta Margaret Peihopa
1105.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Desiree Joyce Park 1107.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Raymond Russell Park
1114.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Waikaraka Emily Ruwhiu
1116.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 124 of 133
Peter Mete-Smith 1118.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Laitohi Elkington 1119.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Brian James Hollis 1120.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Patricia Helen Going
1121.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Edna Rivers Poulava
1124.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Manaoterangi Ernest Forbes
1125.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Myra Wineera 1127.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka Warwick
1128.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ivory Tangaroa 1129.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Naera Tangaroa
1130.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Helena Maddison 1133.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Genevieve Van Eden
1134.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Eileen Phillips 1137.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sue Nikora 1138.001 Figure 4-5 Temple Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 125 of 133
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kasmin Joy Nikora 1139.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Janelle Moana Nikora
1140.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sheree Mere Nikora
1141.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wallace Raiti Peter Reihana
1143.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Te Rina Noelani Ngawaka
1144.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lynette Cassidy 1145.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Christine Makata 1147.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Googie Pirika Whatu Apiti
1155.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Milford Rogers Hamon
1156.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pahemata Kay Apiti
1160.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Percy Te Hira 1162.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Elizabeth Patricia Witehira
1165.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Undertake an assessment of buildings within the former Church College of New Zealand campus and teacher
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4. Submission point dealt with in Chapter 19 Historic Heritage
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 126 of 133
housing for inclusion within Schedule 8A: Built Heritage (structure, buildings and associated sites).
Pita Witehira 1166.003 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts. Undertake an assessment of buildings in the former Church College of New Zealand campus and teacher housing to be included in Schedule 8A: Built Heritage (structures, buildings and associated sites).
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4. Submission point dealt with in Chapter 19 Historic Heritage
Reihana Patrick Nuku
1172.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Talmadge Temuera Harris
1173.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Luana Wikitoria Paki
1174.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
John Charles Paki 1175.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hata Tipoki 1176.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kahuwaero Katene 1177.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mere Marnie Edwards (The NZ Labour Missionary Assn Charitable Trust)
1178.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Kathleen Joyce Tipoki
1179.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Evan H Smith 1180.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Eve McAnnalley 1181.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 127 of 133
Casey Mania Haeata
1182.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
James Ratana (Genesis Energy)
1183.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ashley Rangitane Hiki Haeata
1184.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Verdon Anthony Bartlett
1185.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Douglas Kanuela Strother
1186.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Robert Andrew Joseph
1187.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mark Brian Hague 1188.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Leslie R Newman 1189.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Strantz Dalton Wihongi
1190.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hineawe Hapuku 1191.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ripeka Hapuku 1192.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Quntin A Hapuku 1193.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa Kershaw-Smiler
1197.008 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
The Church of 1201.022 Figure 4-5 Temple Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 128 of 133
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Accept in part
The submission (1201.022) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Oppose Accept in part
The submission (1201.022) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.015
Oppose Accept in part
The submission (1201.022) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Dean Alexander Crafar (Equlation)
1203.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jodhi Ponga 1205.003 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Pirihi Te Ohaki (Bill) Ruwhiu
1210.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lance Harvey 1212.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charles Lowe Hyde Ruwhiu
1213.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Peter S Thomson 1214.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Anthony Poutu 1215.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Wayne Rikki Douglas Te Kira
1216.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rawiri Hemi 1217.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Winifred Rose Hemi
1218.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Sharianne Hinemoa Hemi
1219.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 129 of 133
Jared Ezra Hemi 1220.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Ngawati Smiler 1221.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth Daniels
1222.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Rawiri Russell Hemi
1223.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Maxwell George Horsford
1225.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Meiana Jenelle Gray
1226.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Bruce William Gordon
FS258.003
Support Accept in Part
The submission (1226.001) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Jodhi Ponga FS279.001
Support Accept in Part
The submission (1226.001) to which this further submission relates has been accepted in part
Edmund Wilson 1227.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Joihn Hoani Uru Katene
1228.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jeanette Katene 1229.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Scott McAnnalley 1230.003 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Jenna Maria Burgess
1231.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hana Mariea Haeata
1232.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lana Charrell 1233.004 Figure 4-5 Temple Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Accept in The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 130 of 133
Kershaw-Ryan (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
part See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Esta Vernice Metekingi
1234.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Lillian Winifred Kershaw
1235.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Charlotte Esther Ferris
1236.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Chick Tarawa-Rameka (Kershaw Training Enterprises)
1237.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Thomas Tamai Kershaw
1238.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Hira Te Rangipumanmao Selwyn
1246.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Tiwini Hemi 1259.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
David John Thomson
1261.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Support Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Dennis Harris 1272.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Mary Elizabeth Hamon
1276.001 Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts
Oppose Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Accept in part
The submission supports the intent of the objectives and polices and provides guidance on the potential development of the area See Tracked Changes for Appendix 4.
Figure 4-6 Temple View Shafts and Temple Entrance
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.023 Figure 4-6 Temple View Shafts and Temple Entrance
Support in part
Amend Figure 4-6 Temple View Shaft and Temple Entrance as set out in the submission.
Accept The submission point seeking the amendment to Figure 4-6 is accepted based on:
Supports the objectives and policies of the plan
Improves the administration of the plan. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 5.
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001 Oppose Reject This further submission does not specifically relate to submission 1201.023 and therefore is out of scope of this submission point.
Temple View FS284.016 Oppose Reject The submission that this further submission FS 284.016 oppose has been accepted
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 131 of 133
Heritage Society
Zoning Map
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
Janice Ann Verran 854.004 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Max Walker Verran 855.005 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Michelle Le Prou 201.001 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network - Confirm Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Myra Evans-McLeod 219.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A-Obtrusive to outlook. Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Barry Laurence Flay 350.004 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan -Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
William Wie & Patricia Tekore Moana
352.004 Zoning Map 33A Support in part
Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Noel Henry & Joan Breed
617.002 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Amend Map 33A by rezoning 173 Rotokauri Road (Lot 2 DP 425316) to Residential Zone.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Barry James Crawshaw
870.001 Zoning Map 33A Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Confirm future reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Gary Richard Wiseman
941.002 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A-retain Lot 2 DP 425316 as residential and amend Lot 2 DP 425316 173 Rotokauri Rd from residential to residential reserve.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Melanie Jane Wiseman
958.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A- retain a residential zoning on Lot 2 DP 425316 and rezone Lot 2 DP 425316, 173 Rotokauri Road from Residential to Residential reserve.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Iris & Fred Bryant 972.001 Zoning Map 33A Oppose Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan-confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Geoff C 12.001 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Change the zoning between the Railway and O'Neil Street to encourage better use.
Reject The submission seeking a change in the zoning has been rejected as it does not:
Align with the objectives and policies of the Plan
Claudelands Property Trust
1126.002 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Map 37A- rezone sites of City Limits childcare and the Casalinga café from Special Residential Zone to either Business zone 2 or 7; Amend to change the area of the Special Residential Zone at Claudelands.
Reject
See Decision report for Chapter 6 The submission point seeking the change in the zoning is rejected as it
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.004
Oppose Reject FS286.004 is accepted in part as submission 1126.002 is rejected.
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and
1282.002 Zoning Map 37A Oppose Amend Map 37A by rezoning 729, 731, and 737 Grey St, from Special
See Decision report for Chapter 6
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 132 of 133
Claudelands Property Trust
Residential Zone to either Business 2 Zone (Events Facilities Fringe) or Business 7 Zone. Amend Map 37A to change the boundaries of the Special Residential Zone at Claudelands by removing existing businesses and medium density residential development and align with the description in 5.1.1.1. Amend zoning map 37A to change the zone (except River Road and George Street) to Residential Intensification Zone, with amendments to the Plan to make childcare centres, visitor accommodation and other business uses Permitted Activities in this area.
Reject Reject
The submission point seeking the amendment to the Special Character Area is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan The submission point seeking the amendment to the zoning on Map 37A is rejected as it:
Does not support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan
Alexander Elliot (Claudelands Residents)
FS286.002
Oppose Accept The submission point (1282.002) which this further submission opposes has been rejected.
Hamilton East Community Trust
1013.004 Zoning Map 46A Support in part
Map 46A-rezone the area surrounding Steele Park to a mixed use of commercial fringe and residential.
See Decision report for Chapter 6.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.019 Zoning Map 60A Support Retain Map 60A as it relates to the Temple View Zone.
Accept The matter regarding the confirmation of the zoning raised in the submission point is already provided for within the Plan, so no amendments are necessary
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001
Oppose Reject The further Submission point relating to submission (1201.019) is out of scope.
Charles Joseph Peter McPherson
173.001 Zoning Maps Support Map 33A-Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 DP 425315 (Corner of Baverstock Road and Rotokauri Road) as part of the Lake Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Part as shown on Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
Charles Joseph Peter McPherson
174.001 Zoning Maps Support Map 33A-Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date.
1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.025
Peacocke Special Character Zone
Support in part
Amend 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment by renumber and relocate I16 to I24 relating to Peacocke Special Character Zone.
Accept The submission seeking amendment to Appendix 1 – 1.2 is accepted as this would
Improve plan usability
Improve clarity of the Plan See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1.
New Zealand Transport Agency
924.170
Peacocke Special Character Zone
Support in part
Retain Appendix 1.2 I18 and I19 Peacocke Special Character Zone regarding landscape taking into account the effects of development on the proposed arterial transport corridors with an amendment to clarify whether ‘Peacocke Special Character Zone’ should come under ‘Heritage Values’.
Accept in part
The submission seeking the retention of Appendix 1.2 I18 and I19 and the amendment to Appendix 1-1.2 of the plan is accepted in part as it would:
Be effected by changes sought by other submitters
Support the intent of the Objectives and Policies of the Plan.
Improve plan use
Improve clarity of the Plan
See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1.
Decisions Report – Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, 9 July 2014
Page 133 of 133
1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Adare Company Ltd
482.030 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods
Support in part
Amend Paragraph 3 of Appendix 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone.
Accept The submission seeking the amendment to 1.5.19 is accepted as it would:
Improve the administration of the Plan
Improve Usability of the plan. See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1.
New Zealand Transport Agency
924.196 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods
Support Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.19 a) to g) - Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone Neighbourhoods.
Accept in Part
The submission seeking the retention of 1.5.19 a) to g) is accepted in part as it:
Supports the intent of the objectives and policies within the Plan.
1.4 Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria
Sub. Name FS. Name
Sub. Point FS. Point
Plan Provision Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board
1201.021 1.4 Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria
Support in part
Amend Appendix 1.4 – Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria by adding a Temple View Zone - Urban Design Guide as set out in the submission.
See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1
Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001 Oppose Reject This further submission does not relate to the submission point (1201.021)
Temple View Heritage Society
FS284.014
Oppose See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1.