+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter 9

Chapter 9

Date post: 05-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: jodie
View: 38 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Chapter 9. The Texas Judiciary. The Texas Judiciary. Texas Court System. All State Judges Elected Significant difference from federal judges Subject to voter “punishment” Less freedom to make unpopular decisions Risk losing office if voters disagree with their legal interpretations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
38
Chapter 9 The Texas Judiciary
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 9

Chapter 9The Texas Judiciary

Page 2: Chapter 9

The Texas Judiciary

Page 3: Chapter 9

Texas Court System

• All State Judges Elected– Significant difference from federal judges

• Subject to voter “punishment”– Less freedom to make unpopular decisions– Risk losing office if voters disagree with

their legal interpretations• Less mix of party and ideology

– All Texas high court judges GOP since 1999

Page 4: Chapter 9

Texas Court System

• Two “highest courts” in the state– Texas State Supreme Court

•Highest court for civil cases•9 elected Judges, 6-year terms

– Texas Criminal Court of Appeals•Highest court for criminal cases•9 elected Judges, 6-year terms

– Neither out-ranks the other•Their cases never overlap

Page 5: Chapter 9

Texas Court System

Page 6: Chapter 9

Highest Court Composition(2012)

TX Supreme Court: 9 Justices, all GOP– 2 Women– 1 Hispanic– 2 African American (including Chief Justice)

TX Court Criminal Appeals: 9 Justices, all GOP– 5 Women– 1 Hispanic

Median age 49–55 (across both courts)– Younger, more diverse relative to U.S. Supreme

Court

Page 7: Chapter 9

Court Structure

Local Courts

Supreme Court

State Appeals Courts

County Courts

Criminal Appeals Court

Automatic AppealDeath Penalty Cases

Trivia: municipal courts average 7 million cases per year.

Page 8: Chapter 9

Court Structure

Page 9: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• Appellate Courts v. Trial Courts– Trial Courts

•Learn the facts•Determine how the law applies•Trial courts are where trials actually occur

– Appellate Courts•Panel of judges, no juries•Focus only on application of law, process, procedures•If new facts or flawed trial, send case back to trial

court

Page 10: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• Appellate Courts– Texas has 14 state appellate courts

• Geographically distributed• Appeals courts hear both civil and criminal• Cases heard by three judge panel

– Recall that appeals courts do not hear all cases that are appealed, only those determined to have merit.

Page 11: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• District Courts: major trial courts in Texas• 456 district courts geographically distributed

– Accommodate local volume– Large population counties many district courts

•Ex: Harris County (Houston) has 59, Dallas has 48

• Vast majority of cases are not appealed• Unlike appellate courts, district courts hear

all cases that come before them

Page 12: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• County Courts– County judges deal with county laws– Preside over county commissioners court

•Responsible for administration of county government

– Also take appeals from municipal courts• In many areas, despite the name, county

judges are mostly administrators.– In counties with small populations, county judge is

essentially equivalent of mayor

Page 13: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• Statutory County Courts at Law– These courts take certain (less serious)

cases that would otherwise be heard in district courts

– Jurisdiction varies depending on the county• Statutory Probate Courts

– Probate or guardianship cases

Page 14: Chapter 9

Court Structure

• Justice of the Peace– Deal with minor violations, mostly involving

traffic– Minor civil law cases– Small claims courts

• Most Justices of the Peace are not lawyers

Page 15: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Civil Law: contractual relationships between parties– Includes legally binding business relationships– Includes legally binding personal relationships

•Adoptions, divorces, marriages– Business remedies: monetary compensation

for failure to uphold a contract– Personal remedies: terms of relationship union

or dissolution (whichever is the case)

Page 16: Chapter 9

Legal Process

Page 17: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Criminal Law– Concerned with violations of the law

• Government is always the plaintiff– Individuals do not sue in criminal court– The state is the party pursing the case

• Wide variation possible punishment – Fines, public service, imprisonment, death

Page 18: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Civil cases– Plaintiff lawyers on contingency (outcome based)– Defense attorneys hourly

• Criminal cases– Plaintiff attorneys are government employees– Defense attorneys hourly OR gov’t provided

• Vast Range Legal Representation– experience, firm/gov’t resources,

caseload/priority

Page 19: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Grand Juries• Hear preliminary felony offense cases• Determine whether enough evidence to

proceed with prosecution trial• Do not establish guilt or innocence

– Only focused on whether enough evidence up front that a jury could be convinced to convict.

• Protects citizens from political persecution

Page 20: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Two distinctly different thresholds for determining guilt or innocence – Criminal Trial: guilt beyond a reasonable

doubt– Civil Trial: preponderance of the evidence

• Feasible for a defendant to lose a civil trial but be found not guilty in a criminal one.

Page 21: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Sentencing in Felony Criminal Cases– Sentencing occurs in separate trial– Allows evidence not used during trial– Victim statements invited– Mitigating circumstances defendant’s background

•Introduced at sentencing phase only

• All of above differs from federal felony process

Page 22: Chapter 9

Legal Process

• Legal grounds for losing side to appeal– Trial was unjustly conducted

•An appeals court can order the case be retried•If new evidence surfaces, can appeal for new

trial–Appeals courts never hear new evidence

– Can appeal that a law is unconstitutional

• All capitol cases are automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Page 23: Chapter 9

How Judges Are Selected

Page 24: Chapter 9
Page 25: Chapter 9

Percentage of Judges Obtaining Their Position

Initially through Appointment

Page 26: Chapter 9

How Judges Are Selected

• Texans elect many, many judges.• Most voters know little about judicial

candidates, and use candidate party affiliation to make their vote choices.

• Voters often vote “straight party,” punching one place on the ballot to vote for all nominees of their party.

Page 27: Chapter 9

How Judges Are Selected

Page 28: Chapter 9

How Judges Are Selected

• Name Recognition– Biggest challenge, public largely unfamiliar

with any judge names– Usually have not held office (other than

judgeships, which are rather obscure to public)

• Party Affiliation• Support from local legal community• Party support

Page 29: Chapter 9

How Judges Are Selected

• How should judges be selected?– Options include elections, appointments,

retention elections, and hybrids of each• What do we want from a good judge?

– Tension between legal interpretation and public opinion

• Could our ideal system (however one defines that) get approved by legislature and voters?

Page 30: Chapter 9

WHO ARE TEXANS?

Vote Share of Gubernatorial Candidates and District Judges, 2010

SOURCE: Data are from the appropriate County Clerk office. Note: Percentages are all two-party vote share. “Mean GOP (or Dem.) District Judge” is the mean vote share for all Republican (or Democratic) district judge candidates in that country. *

Page 31: Chapter 9

WHO ARE TEXANS?

Vote Share of Gubernatorial Candidates and District Judges, 2010

SOURCE: Data are from the appropriate County Clerk office. Note: Percentages are all two-party vote share. “Mean GOP (or Dem.) District Judge” is the mean vote share for all Republican (or Democratic) district judge candidates in that country. *

Page 32: Chapter 9
Page 33: Chapter 9

Civil Cases Disposed Of byTexas Courts

Page 34: Chapter 9

Public Opinion Quiz

Should candidates for the Texas judiciary run in nonpartisan elections where candidates do not declare party affiliation in campaigns or on the election ballot?

a. Judges should run without any party affiliation.b. Keep as is, where judges run with clear party

affiliations.

Page 35: Chapter 9

Public Opinion Quiz

Should Texas have one supreme court forboth state civil and criminal cases?

a. Yes, Texas should follow the U.S. Supreme Court model, and have one supreme court.

b. No, keep as is with two supreme courts

Page 36: Chapter 9

Public Opinion Quiz

Should Texas elect all state judges?

a. Yes, keep as is, voters elect all state judges.

b. No, governor should appoint all state judges.

c. Governor should appoint supreme court judges, the rest can remain elected.

Page 37: Chapter 9

Public Opinion Quiz

Should Texas judges make decisions based onwhat voters prefer, or what the law dictates

(even if unpopular with voters)?

a.Judges should make decisions based on what voters prefer.

b.Judges should make decisions based only on the law, without regard for public opinion.

Page 38: Chapter 9

Public Opinion Quiz

Should Texas supreme courts be elected via single member districts (all geographic regions have representation), or should they remain remain at-large contests?a. Change to single-member districts to assure

statewide representation on both courts.b. Keep at-large contests so voters can choose

several judges from same part of the state if they prefer.


Recommended