Thomson South-Western Wagner & Hollenbeck 5e
1
ChapterChapter Eleven Eleven
Power,Politics,
And Conflict
2
Chapter Overview This chapter examines the following topics:
– Power in Organizations• Interpersonal Sources of Power• Conformity Responses to Interpersonal Power• A Model of Interpersonal Power: Assessment• Structural Sources of Power• The Critical Contingencies Models: Assessment
– Politics and Political Processes• Personality and Politics• Conditions That Stimulate Politics• Political Tactics• Managing Destructive Politics
– Conflict in Organizations• Is Conflict Necessarily Bad?• Conditions That Stimulate Conflict• Effects of Conflict
– Negotiation and Restructuring• Managing Diverging Interests• Managing Structural Interdependence
3
Introduction Power, politics, and conflict in
firms can increase productivity and efficiency or reduce them substantially
Understanding power, politics, and conflict is critical to managerial success and survival in today’s business organizations
4
Power in Organizations Power is the ability both to
influence the conduct of others and to resist unwanted influence in return
According to David McClelland, people are driven to gain and use power by a need for power
This need for power can have several different affects on the way people think and behave
5
Interpersonal Sources of Power In their pioneering
research, John French and Bertram Raven identified the major bases or sources of power in organizations– Reward power: based
on the ability to allocate desirable outcomes
– Coercive power: based on the distribution of undesirable outcomes
– Legitimate power: based on norms, values, and beliefs that teach that particular people have the legitimate right to govern or influence others
– Referent (or charismatic) power: possessed by someone who is highly admired
– Expert power: derives from the possession of expertise, knowledge, and talent
6
Conformity Responses to Interpersonal Power
Three distinctly different types of reactions are likely to occur as people respond to attempts to influence their behavior
– Compliance: ensues when people conform to the wishes or directives of others so as to acquire favorable outcomes for themselves in return
– Identification: occurs when people accept the direction or influence of others because they identify with the power holders and seek to maintain relationships with them
– Internalization: people may adopt others’ attitudes and behaviors because this course of action satisfies their personal needs or those attitudes and behaviors are congruent with their personal values
7
A Model of Interpersonal Power: Assessment
French and Raven describe the different kinds of interpersonal power used in organization and Kelman identifies how people respond to this use
Although valuable as a tool for understanding power and its consequences, the model integrating these ideas is not without fault
– Questions arise as to whether the five bases of power are completely independent or whether they are so closely interrelated as to be virtually indistinguishable
The idea that reward, coercive, and legitimate power often derive from company policies and procedures has led some researchers to subsume these three types of power in a single category labeled organizational power
Similarly, because expert and referent power are both based on personal expertise and charisma, they are sometimes lumped together into the category of personal power
The model created by joining French and Raven’s classification scheme with Kelman’s theory is useful in analyzing social influence and interpersonal power
8
Structural Sources of Power
Power also derives from the structure of patterned work activities and flows of information found in every organization
Characteristics of organizations that shape power relations include:– Uncertainty reduction– Substitutability– Centrality
These three variables combine to form the critical contingencies model of power
9
Uncertainty ReductionSubstitutability
Critical contingencies are the things that an organization and its various parts need to accomplish organizational goals and continue surviving
Ways to reduce uncertainty include:– Resource control– Information control– Decision-making control
Reducing uncertainty depends partly on their substitutability
If others can serve as substitutes and reduce uncertainty, then individuals or departments that need help in coping can turn to a variety of sources for aid
The less substitutability present in a situation, the more likely that a particular person or group will be able to amass power
10
Centrality
The ability of a person or group to acquire power is also influenced by its centrality or its position within the flow of work in the organization
11
The Critical Contingencies Model: Assessment
Research strongly supports the critical contingencies model’s suggestion that power is a function of uncertainty reduction, substitutability, and centrality
An intriguing piece of evidence supporting the critical contingencies model was discovered by Michel Crozier– Government-owned tobacco company example
The critical contingencies model appears to describe the structural bases of power quite accurately
Its utility for contemporary managers lies in the observation that the roots of power lie in the ability to solve crucial organizational problems
12
Politics and Political Processes Politics can be defined as activities in
which individuals or groups engage so as to acquire and use power to advance their own interests
In essence, politics is power in action Although political behavior can be
disruptive, it is not necessarily bad Politics can enhance organizational
well-being by ridding companies of familiar but dysfunctional ways of doing things
Research indicates that politicking does occur and has measurable effects on organizational behavior
13
Personality and Politics Researchers have suggested that people who
exhibit the personality characteristic of machiavellianism, the tendency to seek to control other people through opportunistic, manipulative behavior, may also be inclined toward politics
Studies have indicated that self-conscious people may be less likely than others to become involved in office politics because they fear being singled out as a focus of public attention and being evaluated negatively for engaging in politics
14
Conditions That Stimulate Politics
Certain conditions encourage political activity in organizations:– Uncertainty– Organizational size– Hierarchical level– Membership heterogeneity– Decision importance
Politicking is more prevalent in larger organizations than small ones and more common among middle and upper managers
Important decisions stimulate more politics than unimportant decisions
15
Political Tactics When personal characteristics
and surrounding conditions favor them, a variety of political tactics may surface
Each tactic is intended to increase the power of one person or group relative to others
When power increases, so does the likelihood that the person or group will be able to seek out and acquire self-interested gains
16
Acquiring Interpersonal Power: Forming Affiliations
Acquiring Structural Power: Controlling Critical Resources
Forming coalitions or political affiliations with each other represents an important way for people to increase their power and pursue political gain beyond their individual grasp
In cooptation, former rivals become transformed into allies, often by involving them in planning and decision-making processes
Ingratiation, the use of praise and compliments to gain favor and acceptance of others, and impression management, involves behaving in ways intended to build a positive image, can be used to build and maintain political relationships
Controlling the supply of a critical resource gives people power over those whose success or survival depends on having that resource
Political players often attempt to control access to important resources, information, and the people who are the sources of important information or expertise
To succeed as a political tactic, controlling access to important resources, information, or people requires eliminating substitutes for these critical resources and discrediting alternative definitions of what is critical
17
Negative Politics If all else fails, a person may gain the
political upper hand by attacking or blaming others or making them scapegoats for failures
Another tactic is to denigrate or belittle others’ accomplishments
Either approach involves a direct attack on the interpersonal sources of power that others might possess in an attempt to weaken their political positions
Negative politicking can justify the creation of substitute sources of critical resources or information or reduction of the degree of centrality enjoyed by a person or group
18
Managing Destructive Politics Some of the consequences when people band
together, hoard resources, or belittle each other for no other reason than to get their own way include:– Morale may suffer– Battle lines between contending individuals or
groups may impede important interactions– Energy that should be go into productive activities
may be spent on planning attacks and counterattacks
Controlling political behavior is a major part of every manager’s job
19
Managing Destructive Politics Managing destructive politics
includes:– Setting an example– Communicating openly– Reducing uncertainty– Managing informal coalitions and
cliques– Confronting political game players– Anticipating the emergence of
damaging politics
20
Conflict in Organizations Conflict, a process of opposition
and confrontation that can occur in organizations between either individuals or groups, occurs when parties exercise power in the pursuit of valued goals or objectives and obstruct the progress of other parties
The keys in this definition include the idea that conflict involves the use of power in confrontation, that it is a process, and is a problem managers must be able to control
21
Is Conflict Necessarily Bad?Conditions That Stimulate Conflict
Conflict might seem inherently undesirable, but contemporary theorists argue that conflict is not necessarily bad
Current research suggests that conflict is often functional, having positive effects
Conflict can serve as a red flag signaling the need for change
For conflict to occur, three key conditions must exist:– Interdependence: where there is
dependence on each other for assistance, information, feedback, or other coordinative relations
– Political indeterminism: the political pecking order is unclear and subject to question
– Divergence: there must be differences or disagreements worth fighting over
Other conditions contributing to conflict include: time orientations, resource allocations, practices used to evaluate and reward, status discrepancies, jurisdictional disputes, and differing values, assumptions, and general perceptions
22
Effects of Conflict Conflict affects relationships
among people and groups in many ways:– Increased group cohesiveness– Stimulates an emphasis on task
performance– Submission to autocratic
leadership– Structural rigidity– “We-they” attitudes– Distorted perceptions of opposing
groups– Decrease in communication
23
Negotiation and Restructuring A variety of conflict-management
techniques have been developed to help resolve conflict and deal with the negative effects
In general, these techniques are of two types, bargaining and negotiation procedures that focus on managing divergence among the interests of conflicting parties and restructuring techniques that focus on managing interdependence between conflicting individuals and groups
24
Managing Diverging Interests Bargaining between conflicting parties consists of
offers, counteroffers, and concessions Negotiation is the process in which the parties decide
what each will give and take in the exchange Five general approaches to managing divergent
interests exist that are characterized by different mixes of assertiveness and cooperativeness:– Competition– Accommodation– Avoidance– Collaboration– Compromise
The appropriateness of each of these approaches depends on the situation and the time pressure for a negotiated settlement
25
Managing Structural Interdependence Conflict requires
interdependence It can be managed or
resolved by restructuring the connections that tie conflicting parties together
Ways to accomplish this goal include:– Develop superordinate
goals– Expanding the supply of
critical resources– Clarify existing
relationships
– Modifying existing structural relationships
• Decoupling mechanisms of slack resources and self-contained tasks
• Unit-linking mechanisms:
• Network information systems
• Lateral linkage devices:
• Liaison position• Representative
groups: task force and standing committees
26
Managing Structural Interdependence
When neither liaison positions nor representative groups solve intergroup conflict problems, a third type of linkage device called an integrating manager, can be used
In rare instances a fourth type of lateral linkage device called the matrix organization structure is employed