CHAPTER 3
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PLANTATIONS
3.1. Introduction
In any irdustry or business organisation, the
personnel function contributes the main role. A manager, whether
he is in charge of production or marketing function, deals with
human beings and gets his job done through and with people. In
fact the importance of managing the human resources is
considered so great that some have defined., 'Management as
synonymous with personnel management'. Lawrence Appley
describes the manager's job is 'human relations job that functions
through several major activities and that human relation is the
beginning and the end ofthe management job "
3.1.1. Need for Human Resource Management
Human Resource Management is needed by any
organisation that want to be dynamic and growth oriented or to
succeed in a fast-changing environment. Organisations can
become dynamic and grow only through the effort and
competencies of their human resources. Personal policies can
keep the morale and motivation of employees high, but these
efforts are not enough to make the organisation dynamic and take
it in new directions. Employees' capabilities must continuously be
acquired, sharpened, and used. For this purpose an 'enabling'
organisational culture is essential. When employees use their
initiative, take risks, experiment, innovate and make things
I Lawrence.A.Appley. Management in Action. American Management Association. 1956.~19.
happen, the organisation may be said to have an ' enabling
culture'. 2
3.1.2. Personnel Management: Growth and Function in 1ndia3
The personnel function in India has been a product of
various factors, labour legislation being one of them. The
importance of labou_r . officer - - in India Industry was realised as_ ~~ ~~~ .. .- . a~
early as 1929, when the lioyal Commission on Labour was set up. ~-
~
-2~ ?..l~ ~ ~ ~
In 1931, the commission recommended the appointment of labour
officer.
During, the Second World War, the labour officer .--.- ~
~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~-.~%
(Industrial Relation Officers) in Bombay Mill Owner's ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ ~
~ ~
- -
Association was gener;dly incrested in handling welfare and _ ____- ._ -- w-F labour administration. This was there first step regarding labour u
L-- -
welfare in India.
9 After the Ildependence, the Government under the
/ revised Factories Act 1948 made it obligatory for the factories I'====.-
employing 50 or more workers to appoint welfare officers; Under
the Mines Act 1952, this limit for 500 workers, under the
Plantation Labour Act 1951, for 300 workers or more. These Acts
also prescribed the manner of their recruitment, their salaries and
conditions of service, ar,d list of duties to be performed by them. --. However, f i e appointment in
---A
industries remained - bolic, satisfying statutory
requirement without ary specific constructive role to play. The
'personnel man' who was initially known as 'welfare officer has
2 . Rao.T.V.et.aI (1986) p13.
3 .Repolt of the Committee of Lab0k.r Welfare. Delhi, 1969
moved to be known as "Labour Welfare Officer", personnel
management is changed to Human Resource Management.
3.1.3. Objectives of Personnel Department
An importxnt objective of every organisation is
survival, which implies the acceptance of the growth objective --- also. During a period o" time, an organisation losses some of its
-- employees through deaths, retirement, dismissal, and other
causes. These have to 3e replaced. Besides, as an organisation
grows, it requires more employees. The objectives of personnel
management can therefore be described as follows.
1. To attract and secure appropriate people capable of ,
performing effectively the organisation's specific task
2. To utilise human resource effectively.
3. To generate ma-cimurn individual development of the c? -.._ - ~ ~ -
people within the - ~- ~
organisation.
3.2. Human Resource Management in Plantations
Manpower planning is one of the important functions
in any organisation. Job analysis is the basis for manpower A -- - - L
planning. It seeks to discover what is expected from the person . on the j d o w the jol, is performed, the skill and experience
required and the opportunity for advancement
Labour, as factor of production is different from other
factors like material, machinery and money. The importance of -_ - - -
human factor in the efficient and successful management of
industrial enterprises led the manageme -think in terms of
providing some machinery for managi g men ' i ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p . ,/-
~~ -.
3.2.1. Special Features of Plantation Workers
The plantation has a distinct form of organisation,
which gives rise to cen.ain specific social relations. Plantations g t-;_C=-_= <
require large tracts of . cu --- tivable -- land and a large force. - -
- - The areas most suited for plantation crops were
scarsely populated ant1 hence local labour was not easily
available. Thus during the formative years, plantation faced the
problem of acute labour shortage. They had to depend on migrant
labour whose migration had to be induced by the planters.4
Workers were encouraged to migrate to the plantations with their
families. This served two purposes. First the planters wanted a
cheap labour that would be permanently settled in the plantations.
This could be achieved l ~ y encouraging families to migrate rather
than individuals. The entire family-males, females and children
worked on the plantations at wages determined by the planters
Second, family migration ensured that labour could be reproduced
which in turn would east: the problem of further recruitment in the
future.
As a result, almost the entire labour force in
plantation fields especally tea, coffee, cardomom and large
-- > rubber plantations (abo~e 100hectares) companies' immigrants. ------
Almost all these workers and their families ~ are now =anently -- - ._.._ _ - -~
settled in their respectivt: regions and have little contact with their-.~~
- C- - 1--
--- ~no&er speciality of plantations workers is 0
(sppralsal. T$ extent of appraisal of workers and staff depends L-- - upon the importance of the role they play in the management of
4 . Kanchan Sarkar, Economic&Politi :a1 Weekly, Dec.1998, p. L50
estates. The role of eacl field worker is not very important from
the point of management and therefore there is not much scope
for appraisal. Even when temporary workers are made
permanent, the scope for appraisal is limited because it is
generally made on the basis of seniority rather than on any other
consideration. In the cilse of supervisory and other personnel,
though there is no regularity of appraisal in any estate, it has been
agreed with ESUSI that unless there is any black mark in the
service records of the concerned person, his due promotion will
not be withheld. This has been the accepted practice in most
estates5
3.2.2 Recruitment System in Plantations
At governrlent, public, a private undertaking, the
first step that leads to employment is recruitment. There are 1
various categories of posts varying from different scales. Thus the
personnel department h,3s to frame proper recruitment rules for
each cadre of service and for every posts. Even in case of
government level recruitment by open competition, proper time
schedule has to be worked out in terms of time required by public
service commi~sion.~ S ~ I recruitment is an important matter of
personnel department.
3.2.2.1. Traditional System of Recruitment.
Recruitment had presented many problems in the
early days of plantation industry. The estates were developed in
remote areas often away from human habitations. This had to
- 5 .Ibid,pp116-140
6.B.K.J.Menon'. Same aspects of Pe~onnel administration in the states', New Delhi, Val.No.22.No.3
July-September, (1976) pp349-362.
7 . Haridas.V.(1975),ppl18-120.
lead to the recruitment of workers from outside. For this purpose
the estate management used the services of Kanganies. The
employers used to intimate their requirements of workers to
Kanganies who were paid some advance also. Workers brought
by a particular Kanganies worked under his supervision. The
employer in turn paid commission to the Kanganies called Head
Money. This was usually on the basis of the number of workers
brought by him.
But this Ka~ganies system had led to various abuses.
The question of abolishing this system was discussed at the 3rd
session of Industrial Committee on plantation in November 1950.
A committee appoinied by the Government of Kerala
recommended the total abolition of Kangani system and the
creation of a new cadre of Labour supervisors. The Kangani
system was completely abolished in 1962.'
The early l~lantations in Europe were run by slave
labour. After the slave trade was banned by British and France
indenture became the common mode of recruitment.
Scarcity of labour was only one of the reasons for
resorting to the recruitment of slave or indentured labour. In the
normal course when there is shortage of labour, wages increases
in order to attract more labour. For example wages of textile
labour in Mumbai incre ised from Rs. 7 and 12 annas per month in
1863 because the rapicly expanding industry was facing labour
shortage. During the same period, wages of tea plantations
workers in Assam remained static at Rs. 31 month despite acute
labour shortage9.
3.2.2.2. Present System of Recruitment
With the increase in settled population near the
plantations, recruitment From outside has become negligible. The
problem now is how to give employment to dependents of
existing workers who are too numerous. Estate management has
separate policies with regard to the recruitment of ordinary
workers and clerical, technical, supervisory and managerial
personnel. A minority of Indian estates makes recruitment of
workers from dependents. In these estates the trade unions have
been able to enforce a policy of recruitment exclusively from
dependents. This has been made either a part of agreements
between management and workers or practice evolved over the
years.
3.3. Analysis
This topic covers the present employment system of
rubber, tea and cardamom plantations in Kerala. It covers the area
such as the nature of wcak, women employees in estates, training,
personnel department, ~ar ious incentive schemes, trade unionism
in plantations, labour l~roblems in estates etc. Here a total of
16450 employees are taken into consideration includes 4930
rubber employees, 665C tea employees and 4870 from cardamom
employees.
3.3.1. Employment System in Plantations
Generally plantation field have four categories of ( \
workers, male, female, adolescent and children. Male and female * -
workers are those above the age of 18 years. Workers who are
more than 14 years olrl but below 18 years adolescents and
children are those below 14 years. Along with the high rate of
female employment, employment of children is another distinct
feature of plantations, but it is usually in tea plantations. The
plantation Labour Act 1e;;ally permits this.
Generally i r ~ plantation the recruitment of workers is ,-,
made either on a penrLanenfof a/r casual basis. The model d- c =---->
standing orders pre=ed for workmen by the Association of
Plantations of Kerala ( A P K ) define a permanent workman as one
who has been passed by their employer as fit for work and who
has been registered on the check roll for the period of contract,
and a causal worker f?pho is for work of a purely casual or
temporary character. ~ i i d a l workers are also called temporary
workers. The initial recruitment is often made as casual workers
and as and when permanent vacancies arise the casual workers are
appointed to these vacimcies. The following are the details of
employment system in plantations.
3.3.I.a. Rubber
In rubber plantations, the number of empbees. 7 -- - - -- ---
depends on the area under cultivation. Usually in small - .~~ ~ ~ - - ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~ -
plantations, (below looha.), the number of employees varies from
20 to 45; the rate of emrlloyment increases gradually according to
the size of the estates.I0
Unlike the other plantations such as tea,
cardamom etc., there is less number of migrants' employees in
rubber estates. There is no prescribed qualification for ordinary
I0 . Rubber, Kerala Bhasha Sahithya Institute, p30.
workers. Most of the employees are permanent employees.
Permanent employees are more found in large esates. The table
3.1 shows details of eml)loyment system in rubber estates.
Table No.3.1.Employment system in Rubber estates
Temporary employees
From the table it is observed that in large estates 80%
Total
594(20%)
902(46%)
1496
of the total employees are permanent, in small estates the
2970(100%)
1960(100%)
4930
permanent employees ale only 54%. It is analysed that casual or - -- ,-,
(Primary Data) (C.V. = 445.96; T.V. = 3.81; df=1; Sg. = 5%)
temporary employees are more in small estates. A chi-square is . -~ --- 'c
. - conducted by taking the null hypotheses is that there is no__-_ --_ _ _ _ - _ _ _-._ -
difference in the emploqment system followed in different size of
rubber plantations. Since the calculated value is much greater than
the table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded
that the employment system in different size of the rubber
plantations are different
3.3.1.b. Tea
Almost the entire labours in tea plantations are -:7 .--- AT-- ~ .
, ~~ ~-
immigrants and their descendents. All these workers and their ~~ ~~
, ~ ~ - ~ . - ~ ~-~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . ~~ ~- ~
~. - family members are now permanently settled in their respective
regions and they have little contact with their place of origins.
The numbers of permanent workers are more in tea plantations.
The table 3.2 shows the details of employment system in tea
plantations.
I I I . I 1 / Large 1 3579(92%) 1 3 11(8%) 1 3890 (100%)
Table No.3.2.Employnrent system in Tea plantations
I I I I 2 / Small I 2208(80?40) 1 552(20%) 1 2760(100%)
u I I I (Primary Data)(C.V=210.9f'; T.V. =3.841; Degrees of freedom=l; Level of significance =5%)
From the table it is observed that in large estates 92%
Total Permanent employees
are permanent employe^:^ and 8% are temporary employees. The
Temporary employees
ratio of permanent employees to temporary workers is 23:2. In the
case of small estates, 80% are permanent and balance is casual
workers (8:2). "--\.,
A Chi-square with Ho=There no ,-- -
difference in the size of
tea plantations. Since t h ~ calculated value is much higher than the
table value, the null hypotheses is rejected and it is concluded that
the employment system followed in large and small tea estates are
different.
3.3.l.c. Cardamom
In both large and small cardamom estates, one
person is required for maintaining 2.21 hectares. Most of the
employees in cardamom estates are permanent.
The details 3f the employment system in cardamom
plantations are shown in table 3.3.
Table No.3.3.Employmont system in Cardamom plantations
the total employees are permanent and 15% are casual employees.
In the case of small e:;tates 60% are permanent and 40% are
~
Total
2830(100%)
2040(100%) 4870
casual workers. So it 1s clear that the numbers of permanent
(primary Data)(C.V. =389.19 T.V-3.841; Degrees of freedom=l; Significance level = 5%)
From the table it is seen that in large estates 85% of
Temporary employee 425(15%)
816(40%) 1241
employees are higher in large plantations than small one. -3 -- .
A Chi-square is ( c d u c t e y w i t h Ho: there no
-.
Permanent employees :!405(85%) -
1224(60%) 3629
SI.No
1
2 3
difference in the employment W s followed in large and
Type of estates Large
Small Total
small Cardamom planta~:ions. Since the calculated value is greater
than table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded
that the employment system followed in large and small
Cardamom estates are different.
The table 3.4 shows the comparison of employment P5=%
[syste$ in Rubber, Tea and A Cardamom plantations. L- ' , ,
Table No.3.1.Employmenl (yslim> Rubber, Tea and Cardamom ,
I SI.No. / Type of ( Permanent / Temporary / Total Plantations
Rubber
Cardamom 4 Total
(Primary data)(C.V. =551.39; T.V. = 5.991; Degrees of freedom = 2; Significance
employees 3434(70%) 5787(87%) 3629(75%) 12850(78%)
employees 1496(30%) 863(13%) 1241(25%) 3600(22%)
4930 6650 4870 16450
From the table it is observed that out of the various
plantations, the number of permanent employees are higher in tea
(87%)followed by cardamom (75%) and rubber (70%).This is
because most of the eniployees in tea estates are permanently
settled in estates itself. hfore than 78% of the total employees are
permanent and only 22% casual workers (temporary).
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho: there no
difference in the emp1o:~ment system is followed in rubber, tea
and cardamom. Since the calculated value is much higher than the
table value, the null hypotheses is rejected and it is concluded that
the employment system 'ollowed in rubber, tea and cardomom are
different.
3.3.2. Women Employees in Plantations
The main rt:ason put forth by the employers for high
employment of women is that work in plantation is to a large
extent gender specific. In tea plantations, women are considered
more efficient in pluckir~g tealeaves. Men are better in other types
of work relating to maintenance of plantations. In reality the - -. . n
division of labour anlong the sexes is more a matter of ~ ~~ ~~~
-~~ ~ ~- -. - ~
~ ~~ ~- -.I
- - - ebq.6,"" ' convention. or more 1ikl:lv a belief. than a scientific realitv. The ,
~ - ~ - ~ ~~- ~~ ~.. ~ ~ <<-~-. 1
~ -~ ~~ ~~~
more important reason ibr the employment of women is because
of the family-based enlployment system in earlier stages. As
mentioned earlier, fam lies migrated to the plantations and all
members were engaged in work. This tradition has continued. In
fact the employers have used the widespread employment of
women as a means of keeping wages depressed. Family based -_qe
recruitment system 1s -- -- - ' &e main reason for the employment of women workers.
3.3.2. a. Rubber T In rubber plantations, the numgrs pf woman
c.- -- t-----__ emdoyees arr very low In large plantations, women employees -- ---2
are mainly e m p l o y e $ k y g field, while in small estates, they c-
are employed re-plating, ew-planting, fertilising field etc". +---- 2
Table No.3.5 shows the details of women employees in rubber
plantations.
Table No.3.5.Women Employment System in Rubber estates
I I I I 1 I Large 1 504(20%) 1 2376(80%) 1 2970(100%)
Male employees
I I I I
2 / Small 1 4!)0(25%) 1 1470(75%) 1 1960(100%)
Total employees
I I I 3 I Total -+mi 3 846 4930 - I I I
(Primary Data)(C.V. = I 7.2 17; T.V. = 3.84 1; Degrees of freedom= I ; Significance level = 5%)
From the table it can be seen that 20 % of the total -- employees in large estates are women workers and in the case of , /, -
'"'~t2& small estates 25% of the total employees are women employees. It
v-- ~ ~~ ~ .~ A #%!'I - A . is observed that women workers are more in small estates than G,-
large one.
A Chi-squa1.e test is conducted with Ho: there is no ~ ~ ~~
~.~ -- 9 , v q - difference in the womeri employment system followed in large
- ~ - - ~ - A_ --- .-
and small rubber estates. Since the calculated value is much . -- -- - - -- -. -
greater than the table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it
is concluded that the women employment system in large and
small rubber estates are different.
3.3.2.6. Tea
The number of women employees is very high in tea - '-. plantations compared to other plantations. In tea estates 6 m a n i
C___-
employees are considered more efficient in plucking of leaves
than men. Male worker;$ are mainly centered in maintenance of
plants and preparation oi'lands.
The table 3.15 points out the details of women-men
employees in tea estates.
Table No.3.6.Women Employment System in Tea plantations
Male Total employees employees
1 1 I I
2 I Small 1 1104(40%) 1 1656(60%) 1 2760(100%)
I I I I 1 I (Primary data)(C.V. =41.69; T.V. ~3 .841; Degrees of freedom=]; Significance level=5%)
From the table, it is seen that in large sector estates
I I I I
48% of the total employ~zes are women employees, but in the case
3 I Total / 2971
of small estates, only 40% of the total employees are women
employees. It is noticec that in large plantations, the number of
3679
woman employees are higher than small estates.
6650
A Chi-square: test is conducted with Ho=there is no ~~ - ~ .- ~
~~ ~
~~- - ~- ~-
difference in the wome:~ employment ~ s t e m in ~- larare -----A- and small ~
~- -, ~.~, ~ ~~
tea estates. &ce the calculated value is greater than the table . .--- value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is conclude that the
women employment s:rstem followed in large and small tea
estates are different.
3.3.2.c. Cardamom
Women employees in cardamom estates are mainly
engaged in fertilising process, plucking d collection for ? vegetative propagation etc. Compared
w
f i ! , *@. ,
number of women employees is low i __.-I_--__ --
c---- table 3.7 shows the details of women employees in cardamom
estates.
Table No.3.7.Women Employment system in Cardamom plantations.
I .%.NO I Type of I Women / Male / Total /
I 1 I I 2. 1 Small 1 5138(46%) 1 1102(54%) / 2040(100%)
employees
1840(65%) 2830(100%)
L I I I
(Primary Data)(C.V.=58.86;7'.V.=3.814;Deg~ees of freedom=l;Significance level
,
From the table it is seen that in large cardamom
estates, only 35% of the total employees are women workers and -_ --- '"1------
in small plantat%iis, 45% of the total workers are women .It is c-- - - . _ _ -. -
noticed thit compared to large estates more women employees are
4870 3. 1 Total 1 1928
found in small estates.
2942
A Chi-square test is conducted; with Ho = there ism __-~ ---~ ~- ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-~ .- . ~ . ~
difference in the . wom,:n -~ - ~ - employment system in large and small e~~ ~ ~ ~
estates .- of c a r d a m . Since the calculated value is more than the
table value, the null and it is concluded that
the women and small estates are
. different.
3.3.2.d. Comparison
details of women employment
system in Plantations crops
From the tsble, it is seen than compared to other
Male employees
1084(22%)
2971(45%)
1928(40%)
5983(36%)
plantations, women employees are more found in tea plantations
Total
(45%) followed by cardamom (40%) and rubber 22%).It is seen A .
(Primary data)(C.V. =660.58; 1'.V. =5.991; Degrees of freedom = I ; Significance
level = 5%)
3846(78%)
3679(55%)
2942(60%)
10467(64%)
that compared to tea and cardamom,
women workers in rubb1:r plantations. Out of the total employees, --
-women employees are only 36 %. - -
A chi-sqnlre test is conducted; Ho= there is no
4930(100%)
6650(100%)
4870(100%)
16450
- <-- difference in women employment system followed in rubber, tea c --
and cardamom plantations. Since the calculated value is greater
than table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded
that the women emplo!~ment system in different plantations are
different.
3.3.3. Nature of Work in Plantations
3.3.3.a. Rubber
In rubber estates, the nature of work involves some
skill. The main filec requires high skill is tapping. The *--- - -
development of the rubber industry mainly depends on tapping.
Only experienced worke:rs are appointed in tapping field." Other
fields work in rubber estates are fertilising. It requires less skill. . - ~~
~ ~ - ~ - ~ .~ . ~ - .
able^ 3.9 gives the nature of work in rubber estates. G
estates employees 3 % 1 832(28%) 1 356(12%) I2970(100%) I
in -- Rubbe~I_an@Cb11~ '. pdZT '
-- - -_C -
From the table it is observed that in large estates
Total Semi-
60 % workers are skilled workers, 28 % are semi-skilled and
Unskilled employees
Small 1058(51%)
12 % are unskilled. Semi-skilled and unskilled workers are
(Primary Data)(C.V. =58.32; T.V. =5.99; Degree of freedom=2; level of
392(20%)
748
510(26%)
mainly engaged in milisterial/office work. In small plantations,
1960(100%)
4930 m3 ' 1342
54 % of the total employees are skilled, 26 % are semi-skilled and
20 % are unskilled. Compared to large estates, unskilled workers
are more found in small plantations and semi skilled workers are
more found in large esl.ates.
A Chi-square test is conduct with Ho=there is no
difference in the naturz of work in large and small rubber estates.
Since the calculated v,ilue is greater than the table value, the null
hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the nature of work
in rubber plantations is different according to the size of the
estates.
3.3.3.6. Tea
The work in Tea plantation was highly skilled. Most of - the workers especially field workers were highly skilled. Plucking h-- --- -.__C__-
tealeaf is a skilled job This skill is hereditary one. The table C_-_ . - _ _--
shows 3.10 the details oj't ture of work in tea estates. IC $3
Table NO.^.+ Natuybf work in Tea plantations I
Semi- Un- Total skilled skilled
workers6 workers 195(5%) 39(1%) 3890(100%)
I I I I I I I
(Primary Data)(C.V=5.96; :'.V=5.99; Degrees of Freedom=2; Significance
I I I I I
From the table, it is observed that in both large and
3 I Total I 6278
small tea estates, most (of the employees are skilled followed by
semi-skilled employees.Un-skilled workers are few in tea estates.
319
In large sector estates 94 % are skilled workers and semi-skilled
workers are only 5 % followed by unskilled workers (l%).In - < & T , h i a 95 % wo~kers are skilled followed by semi-skilled
53
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho= there is no
6650
difference in nature of work in large and small tea estates. Since
the calculated value is less than the table value, the null
hypothesis is accepted and it is concluded that there is no
difference in the natur,: of work in large size and small size --;--- - - .-~
estates. -..- ~- -c - .
3.3.3.c. cardamom
The emp1oye:es in cardamom plantations are highly
skilled. The work in cardamom estates such as mulching,
manuarin preparation of nurseries, transplanting A the fields etc. requires high skill. Table 3.1
work in cardamom estays-,
Table N o . J . l l ~ k - y d w o r k in Cardamom plantations b~ Semi- Un- Total
workers skilled skilled
I I I I I
2 1 Small 1 1632(80°/0) 1 204(10%) 1 204(10%) 1 2040(100%) I I I I I
3 1 Total 1 4009 1 544 I317 / 4870 1 I I I I I I
(Primary Data)(C.V=71.895; T.V=5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; Level of
It is observed from the table that in large estates
84% of the total emploqees in cardamom estates are skilled, 12%
are semi-skilled. The ur -skilled workers are only 4% of the total
workers. In the case of :;mall estates 80% of the total workers are
skilled workers, 10% are semi-skilled and 10% are unskilled. So
it is analysed that the nature of work in cardamom estates are
highly skilled.
A Chi-squa-e is conducted with-s no I
difference in the naturt: of work in large and small cardamom
estates. Since the calculated is much greater than the table value,
the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the nature
of work in large and sm;ill cardamom plantations are different.
3.3.3. d. Comparison
The details of nature of work in each plantation - ~- - ~- ? ~
(rubber, tea and cardamom) ate shown in table.3.12.
I I I I I I I (Primary data)(C.V=2434.68; T.V=9.488; Degrees of freedom=4; Significance
Table No.3.lZ.Nature of work in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom plantations
From the tilble it is observed that the number of
skilled workers is mclre in tea estates (94%) followed by
lantations workers 2840(58%)
6278(94%)
Cardamom 4009(82%)
Total 1312:'(80%)
cardamom (82%). In the case of rubber estates only 58% are
Unskilled workers 748(15%)
53(1%)
3 17(7%)
Semi- skilled 1342(27%)
3 19(5%)
544(11%)
2205(13%)
skilled workers. Semi-skilled workers are more in rubber (27%)
followed by cardamom (11%) and tea (5%). The number of
unskilled workers are more in rubber (15%) followed by
cardamom (7%) and it is very few in tea estates (1%). and
Total
4930(100%)
6650(100%) -
4870(100%)
cardamom estates. Out of the total employees, 80% are skilled,
13% are semi-skilled and 7% are unskilled.
11 18(7%) 16450(100%)
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in the naturl: of work in rubber, tea and cardamom
plantations. Since the c:alculated value is much greater than the
table value, the null hyrlothesis is rejected and it is concluded that
the nature of work in ru~ber, tea and cardamom are different.
3.3.4. Training
After the 1,ecruitment of suitable persons, the next
personnel function is to arrange for their training. Training beings - about an improvement of the quality and quality of output by
increasing the skill of employees. Trained personnel will be able
to make much better ant1 more economical use of materials. It will
create a feeling among the workers that they are being cared for,
and the employee is *sincere to them. This will improve the
relations between the employers and employees.'3
3.3.4. I. Training in Plantations
At present, there are no training facilities available in, C J - ' ~ L --
plantations field. In some rubber estaes, Rubber Board give ---- A -- -.--
arrange some training facilities relating to tapping and in some - - -
lar@Fc~amom estates, Cardamom Growers Association gives
some training facilities. But in tea estates, there is no systematic (7 - -
training facilities are available now. - -- -. - - - L S ~ - 3.3.4.a. Rubber
In rubber pl mtations, the Rubber Board conduc some
training and demon~tration facilities. The Rubber c applng
Demonstrator attachec~ to each regional office visits plantations
and demonstrate to growers and tappers the scientific method of
tapping. For this, therr: are 23 tapping training schools run by the
Board at different plantation centers. Besides the Board conducts
various courses for short duration.I4~he table 3.13 the gives the
details of the training :system in rubber estates.
13 . William Mc Gehee el.al, Tn'zning in business &Industry (1961) p34, New York
14 .Rubber and its cultivation, RI bber Board(2000)p71
estates 41 % adopt systematic_train~cil i t ies relating to tapping - - - -/ - -- . and fertiliser usage anc in small estates only 30 % give some
Table 3.13.Training facilities in Rubber estates
-, --. ~
~ ~ . .. .. - ~ ~ . .- .~ . training. ( ---\ --
A Chi-Squa1.e is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in training system in adopted in large and small rubber
Total
50(100%)
50(100%)
100
S1.No Type of Systematic estates training
Large 20(4 1%)
Small 15(30%)
Total 3 5
plantations. Since the calculated value is less than the table value,
(Primary Data)(C.V=1.098; 1.V. =3.841; Degrees of freedom=l; Significance
level=5%)
From the table, it is observed that in large rubber
No training
30(59%)
35(70%)
65
the null hypothesis is accepted and it is concluded that there is no
difference in the trainng system adopted in large and small
rubber estates.
3.3.4.6. Tea
Now at present, there is no systematic training is .- available to workers ir tea estates. But, in some large hectare . ~
~~ ---- ~~. ~~~-~~~ ~
estates some training fr~cilities are provided relating to plucking
and processing of tea leilves.
The details of training are shown in table No.3.14.
From the bible it is observed that in large estates,
Table No.3.14.Training facilities in Tea estates.
12% provide some training facilities and 88% of them are not. In
SI.No estates
6(12%)
Small l ( l%)
Total 7
the case of small estates only 1% give some training facilities.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there 7 - - - -
difference in the training system i n y l rubber estates. F-------------- --.-- -
(Primary Data)(C.V=9.38; 1'.V. =3.84; Degree of freedom=l; Significance
level=5%)
No training
44(88%)
49(99%)
93
t . Since calculated value 1s greater than theoretical value, the null
Total
50(100%)
50(100%)
100
hypothesis is rejected and concludes that the training system in
large and small estates i:; different.
3.3.4.c. Cardamom
Presently few are available in
cardamom plantations. But undertakings, /-F' /'&me a aining ' ' facilities relating to re-planting, fertiliser usages
h. are available. Ir certain areas, Cardamom Growers'
Association conduct certain study classes, seminars etc. for their
workers. It helps them 10 develop the plantations in a systematic
way. The table 3.15 shows the details of training in cardomom
Table No.3.15.Training in Cardamom estates
Type of Training No Total estates system training
Large 6(13%) 44(87%) 50(100%)
Small 49(99%) 50(100%)
Total 7 93 100
(Primary Data)(C.V=3.82; T.V=3.84; Degrees of freedom=l; Level of significance=5%)
From the table it is observed that 13% of the large
training facilities and in the case of small estates /
b l % provide training system. A Chi-square is conducted with
Ho= there is no difference in thertraining system in large and - ~
/--- \--
small size cardamom c:states.%&e the calculated value is less
than the table value, the null hypotheses is accepted and it is
concluded that there i; no difference in the training system in
large and small cardamom estates.
3.3.4.d. Comparison
In the case of rubber plantations, there is no - C . ..
difference in the trairt,ing system in - - --
plantations and cardarnom plantations, there is no difference in
the training system in large and small estates. Table 3.16 shows
the details of the trailing system in rubber, tea and cardamom
plantations.
Table No: 3.16.Training system in Plantations.
I I I I
Total
100 100 - 100
No Training
65 93 93
lantations Rubber
- Cardamom
300
Training system
3 5 7 7
(Primary Data)(C.V=38.34: T.V=5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; Level of
25 1 4 Total 49
From the table, it is observed that 35% of the rubber
estates have training facilities followed by tea(7%) and
cardamom(7%) in eq'lal numbers. Herec&ber plantations -
provide some training facilities relating to tapping.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no . , ' ,
difference in the training facilities in rubber, tea and cardamom. ~~7 ~-
. -~ -~ -A~-~ -~ . -~ -~~ . - . Since the calculated value is thanthe table value, the null
hypotheses is rejected and concluded that the training facility in
different plantations crops are different.
3.3.5. Supervisory Staff in Plantations
The number oi'supervisory staff is different according to --. different crops. It depends on the total employment.'5 - - C
3.3.5. &Rubber
In rubber pl.mtations, the services of the supervisory
staff are mainly in the jield of tapping, sheet formation, fertiliser J 9 usage e t c it de ends m the total employment. m e table 3.17 uy . - - - - . ------- . -4
shows the details of supervisory in rubber plantations.
Staff in Rubber estates Number of Supervisory Staff
Up to 50 1-3
Above 200 17 above
(Primary Data) A .. From the i able it is observed that the estates having 2 -
the area upto 50 h e c t a r e s i r e s - 1 to 3 persons as supervisors, 3 ..., -- to 7 persons in estates m i n g the area between
50ha.-100ha.Estates having the area between 100ha. to 150ha. 1 requires 7 to 12 persons as supervisors and 12 to 17 persons are ' I needed in estates having area 150ha.to 200 ha.In case of estates
having above 200 hectares, 17 and above persons are required for I supervision. I 3.3.5.b. Tea
The number of supervisory staff is large in tea
plantation compared to other crops such as rubber, cardamom etc.
This is because the entire production of tea is based on systematic
plucking of leaf, syste~natic cutting of plant etc. So it requires a
systematic supervisior~. The table 3.18 shows the details of
supervisory staff in tea estates.
Table No.3.18.Supervisory Staff in Tea estates.
T x r r l Supervisory staff
A- I I (Primary data)
From the table, it is observed that estates having the
I I
area up to 50 hectares requires 1-9 nos.supervisory staff and it is
5
increased to 16 numbers where the estates having the area up to
100 hectares. In the case of third category (100-150hectares), the
Above200
number of supervisory staff is 16-23.Large estates having the area
30 and above.
between 150-200 hectares requires 23-30 supervisory staff and if
the area increased above 200 hectares, the number of supervisory
staff is also increased above 30.
3.3.5.c. Cardamom
The number of supervisory staff in cardamom estates -- is changed according to the place and area under cultivation. The C __-. - -
table 3.19 shows the supervisory staff pattern in cardamom
plantations.
Table No.3.19 Supervisory Staff in Cardamom Estates
1 Sl.No / Area (ha.) 1 Number .- of Supervisory Staff
1-5
-1 23 andabove I
(Primary Data)
From the table, it is observed that in cardamom
estates, upto 50 ha., 1 to 5 supervisory staff is required, and the
area between 50ha to lOOha., 5 to 10 persons are required. In the
case of estates having the area between 100 to 150ha. 10 to 16
persons are required. E:;tates having the area between 150ha. to
200ha.,16 to 23 persons are required.23 and above number of
persons are required in estates having more than 200ha.
3.3.5.d Comparison
Table 3.20 shows the Supervisory staff pattern in
Rubber, Tea and Cardatr~om Plantations.
Table No.3.20.Supewisory Staff in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom
Number of Supervisory Staff Rubber Tea Cardamom
Up to 50 1-3 1-9 1-5
50-100 3-7 9-16 5-10
100-150 7-12 16-23 10-16
above above I above / above (Primary Data)
From the analysis, it is observed that supervisory staff
is more required in tes. plantations than rubber and cardamom
estates. The number of supervisory staff is increased according to
the size of the estates.
3.3.6. The Personnel Department
Although in one sense evxoAe in an organisation is c- ~-~ ~
concerned with the personnel . function, in case of larger - . . ~~. . ~ ~ -~ -.
~ ~
-7-
organisations a special department is segregated -~ - to help line _____/------ ~~. ~ ~ ~
<management to secure the optimum use of personnel with the help
of the personnel department performing an advisory or a staff
function.I6 The increa:;e in the number of employees in an
organisation necessitates greater emphasis being placed on
personnel management as well as the adoption of standardised
procedure for employment and compensating plans. The
personnel department t ~ u s helps management in securing, using
and developing appropriate manpower to active the organisation's
objective.17
3.3.7. Personnel Department in Plantations
The persomiel department in plantations industry s.
deals with the recruitment method of employees, wage schemes, - - - _____----- .
various i ncen~ i "e<$c -n i emi i s ' welfare measures, trade
union influence in estate;; etc,
The personn:l department deals with the matters such
as incentives schemes, wage policy, training facilities and other
allowances to the employees.'8 Majority of the large estates
maintain personnel department and a personnel manager. Table
3.21 shows the details of personnel department and personnel
manager in rubber estates.
Table No.3.21.Personnel department structure in Rubber estates.
estates
I I I I I
1 / Large ( 6(1?1%) / 31(62%) 1 13(25%) 1 50(100%) I I I 1 I
2 I Small I 3(7%) 1 43(85%) 1 4(8%) 150(100%)
(primary Data)(C.V=7.69; 'T.V=5.99; Degrees of freedom=2; Significance
level=5%)
The table 3 21 shows that 13% of the large estates
I I I 1 I
have personnel departmc:nt only and 62% have personnel manager
only. 25% of the large estates have both. In the case of small
3 / Total ( 51
plantations, 7% have p:rsonnel department only and 85% have
17 74 100
personnel manager only and 8% have both. Most of the estates,
both large and small have personnel manager only. Compared to _Did jb; /\-.----- 't-------
smallholdings, both pe~sonnel and per=el manager are more &-P-,~W . , -- ~- __ exist in large sector estates._--
&-----
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in the personilel department structure in large and small
size of the rubber estti1:es. Since the calculated value is greater
than the table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is
concluded that the personnel department structure in large small
estates are different.
3.3.7.6. Tea
The personnel department in Tea estates deals with all
the matters relating to the employees such as training if any,
incentives and other benefits schemes, labour disputes etc. The
table 3.22 shows details of the personnel departments and
personnel managers in lea estates.
Table.No.3.22. Personnel department structure in Tea estates mmi Department manager
estates
I I I I I I I
(Primary Data)(C.V=34.08; I'.V=5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; Significance
I I I I I
From the table it is seen that in 5% of the large
estates and 2% of the small estates have only personnel
100 3 I Total I 3
department but not personnel manager. In such cases the general
manager looks the per:;onnel affairs of the employees. 15% of the
45 52
large estates and 75% ot'the small estates have personnel manager
only.80% of the large estates have both personnel department and
personnel manger, but i l the case of small estates only 23% have
both. From the analysis, it is clear that-in small estates, there is A.M.-
less number of personriel departments, but most of them have L --.- --- personnel manager only and large sector estates have both
personnel department arjd personnel manager. -
* -
A Chi-square: test is conducted with Ho= there is no
difference in the personriel department structure in large and small
tea estates. Since the calculated value is greater than the table
value, the null hypother,is is rejected and it is concluded that the
personnel department structure in large and small tea estates are
different.
3.3.7.c. Cardamom
In large ca~.damom plantations, there is a separate
department for personn":l affairs and a manager headed it. The
table 3.23 shows the details of personnel department in cardamom
estates.
Table No.3.23.Personnel department structure in Cardamom estates.
I I I I 2 I Small / 8(15%) / 41(82%) 1 1(2%) / 50(100%)
S1.No
1
Type Total
estates
I I I I 1 I 1 (Primary data)(C.V=59.87, T.\I=5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; Significance
I I I I I
From the table it is clear thatlo% of the large estates
3 1 Total 1 13
have personnel departm,:nt only and 15% have personnel manager
only. 75% of the large estates have both. But in the case of small
48 3 9 100
estates, 16% have per:;onnel department only and 82% have
personnel manager only and 2% have both. In large sector estates,
most of them have both personnel department and personnel
manager, but in smallholdings, most of them have personnel i~ -.
manager only. _~~ /
//-.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho= there is no . ~ - .. ~ ~ .~ . ~~ .
difference in the personnel department structure in large and small
cardamom estates. Sincc: the calculated value is greater than the
table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that
the personnel department structure in large and small cardamom
estates are different. ,--+ .
3.3.7.d Comparison
Table 3.24 shows the Personnel Departments pattern in
Rubber, Tea and Cardarr om estates.
From the table it is observed that, both personnel
Table No.3.24.Personnel Departments System in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom
department and personnt:l manager are more found in Tea estates
SI.No Type of Personnel
R 7 ; e n t
Y Rubber
Cardamom 13
4 Total 5 8
(52%). In rubber plan.ations, most of them have personnel
manager only 74%, 17% have both and 9% have personnel
(primary Data)(C.V=58.284; T V 4 . 4 8 , Degrees of freedom=4; Significance
Personnel Manager only
74
45
48
134
manager only. In the case of Cardamom estates 13% have only
Both
17
52
39
108
Total
100
100
100
300
Personnel Department and 48% have only Personnel Manager and
39% have both.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no C-----.-.-.. ----. ~ .A
_./--\_
difference in the ~ ~ n n e l department structure followed in -~ -- -- .~
~~ ~~. ---- _ -- -- I
rubber, tea and cardarnc~m plantations. Since the calculated value -. -------- -- - 1s greater than the table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and
it is concluded that the personnel department system followed in
different plantations are different.
3.3.8. Wage policy and incentive sche~nes.'~
The need :For well-conceived and effective wage
policy has been felt in India for long time in the past. With a large
working force that outnumbers the demand for labour from
industry, the Government naturally felt worried over the
miserably low remuneration at which workers were available to
industry. In 1928, the I.L.0 adopted the draft convention on
Minimum Wage fixing machinery. In 1931, the Royal
Commission on Labour made a reference to the low earnings of
the workers in the country. It referred to the irregularities and
malpractices in regard to the payment of wages to industrial
workers. In 1936, Paymc:nt of Wages Act was passed; it came into
force in March 1937. The Act applies only to those workers
whose earnings is less than Rs.4001 month. It requires that the
wages should be paid not late than the seventh day of the month. -
\ -- --A
3.3.8.1..Incentive Scltemes in Plantations.
The 50th Indian Labour Conference in 1957 put the
concept of a need-based minimum wages and other incentives
schemes in plantations,. According to them, a need-based
- 1 9 . V.Agnihotri, Evolution ofwage policy in India-Indian Labour Journal (1961) pI 149.
minimum wages must tace into account the minimum needs such
as food, clothing, fuel artd housing of three units of consumption
in plantations. But the employers' representatives on the wage
board strongly objected to the formula accepted by the Indian
Labour Conference. Thcy argued that since employment in the
plantations was family based, three units of consumption were too
high as every family had at least two workers. Hence they
suggested that only 1 .Sunits of consumption should be taken for
determining the incentives schemes and the need based minimum
wage.''
3.3.8.2. Remuneration of supervisory, clerical and other personnel in ,plantations. In plantations, the supervisory, clerical and other
personnel are paid weekly or monthly salary. The salaries and
other benefits are based on the agreement between UPASZ and
ESUSI. In addition to ss.lary, the agreement covers such matters
like details of bonus, annual increment, other allowance and
emoluments etc. They are also entitled to gratuity and Provident
Fund contribution, sickness benefits; travelling allowances, leave
with wages, and retirement benefits such as PF and gratuity. This
is common for emplojees and ~ u ~ e r i o r s . ' ~ ~ h e details of the
incentive schemes in plantations are as follows.
There was and upward movement of wage and
incentives after 1945 it1 Rubber plantation Industry. With the
inclusion of plantation industry in the schedule to Minimum
Wages Act 1948, wages and incentive schemes of rubber
20 Haridas.V, Plantations Management (1975) p13 1
21 lbtdp140
plantation worker also came within the spheres of State
Regulation. Accordingly in 1952 the state government of
Travancore-Cochin (now part of Kerala), Madras and Mysore
fixed minimum rates of wage for rubber plantation workers.
In 1974 the Government of Kerala revised wage by a
notification issued under Minimum Wages Act The notification
made changes in the payment of Dearness Allowance, which was
related to the cost of liv ng index of Ernakulam Center and would
be revised every three nionths. The plantation Labour Committee
of Kerala has had a successful history of negotiation of wages and
other matter during the last decades.22
In addition to wage, rubber plantation workers are
also entitled to get other benefits such as medical benefits, leave
with wage, provident Fund and gratuity. Women worker are
eligible for maternity benefits. The above benefits are usually
granted to permanent workers. The table 3.25 shows the various
incentives schemes adopted in rubber plantations in Kerala.
Table No.3.25.Incentivt. Schemes in Rubber plantations
Festival Annual Others estates Allowance Increment
(Primary Data)
From the table, it is observed that 98% of the large
estates give bonus, 60% provide festival allowance, 90% give
annual increment to their permanent employees and 58% give
other benefits such washing allowance, uniform allowance to
factory employees, and others at the time of school opening and
other important days eti:. In the case of small estates, 60% give
bonus, 41% provide festival allowance,52% give annual
increment and 14% give other benefits. Out of the various
incentives schemes, borms is the most important for both large
and small estates,
3.3.8.6. Tea
In tea plantations, the allowances and other schemes
are according to the rules provided by the Companies Act and the
agreements behveen the trade unions and management. Gratuity
and other benefits are provided by government rules. Most of the
tea estates provide varicus wage schemes and other incentives to
their employees. Most o F them provide bonus, followed by annual
increment. But it is given to Permanent employees only. The
table 3.26 shows the details of the incentive schemes provided in
the tea plantations.
the small estates provid~: bonus to their employees. In the case of
Table No.3.26.Incentive schemes in Tea estates
festival allowance, 82% of the large and 42% of the small estates
S1.No Type of Bonus estates
Large 49(99%)
Small 48(95%)
Total
give such incentives. The annual increment is provided by 95% of
the large and 80% of the small estates.60% of the large estates
(Primary Data)
It is noticed that 99% of the large estates and 95% of
Festival Allowance
41(82%)
21(42%)
62
provided other allowan~:es such as washing allowance, uniform
Annual Increment
47(95%)
40(80%)
87
Others
30(60%)
10(20%)
40
allowance etc. In the case of small estates only 20% provided
such facilities. From the analysis, it is clear that, out of the various
schemes, bonus is comrnon for all estates whether large or small
followed by annual incrc:ment.
3.3.8.c. Cardamom
All cardamc~m plantations provide incentives and
other benefits to their employees. Most of the large estates
provide a systematic wage scheme according to the minimum
wages Act. In small esi.ates (below 50 hectares), the bonus and
other benefits is declared by the management in proportionate
with the present system. The details of the incentive schemes are
shown in table 3.27.
Table No.3.27.Incentive schemes in Cardamom estates
estates
From the table it is observed that, 85% of the large
Large 43(8:5%)
Small 40(80%)
3. Total 83
estates provides bonus, 30% provide festival allowance, 85% give
Festival Allowance
annual increment to their permanent employees.40% provide
(Primary Data)
15(30%)
15(30%)
3 0
others such as washing allowance, uniform allowance, advance
Annual Increment
wages etc. In the case of small estates, 80%give bonus to their
employees, 30% give festival allowance, 75% give annual
Others
43(85%)
38(75%)
8 1
increment and 15% give other allowances such as uniform,
20(40%)
8(15%)
28
advance wages etc.Fron1 the analysis, it is clear that, most of the
estates both large and small give bonus and annual increment to
their employees.
3.3.8.d. Comparison
In all the three plantations, bonus provided to most of
the employees follow(:d by annual increments. But annual
increment is given only to permanent employees. Festival
allowance is provided by only the larges estates of rubber and tea
but in cardamom plantations, it is provided by both large and
small states in equal numbers. Table 3.28 shows the details of
incentive schemes in plantations.
Table No.3.28.Incenthes schemes in plantations
I I I I 2 1 Tea
L 97 62 87 40
Others
3 6 lantations
I 4 Total 1 259 t 142 I I
239 1 104
(Cardamom ~t 30 I I
II_l_-I-II_/ (primary data)
Festival allowance
50
81
From the table, it is observed that 97% of the tea
Annual Increment
7 1
2 8
estates provide bonus, 62% give festival allowance, 87% give
annual increment and Li0% provide other facilities. In the case of
rubber estates 79% give bonus, 50% give festival allowance, 71%
provide annual increment and 36% give other facilities. In the
case of cardamom, 83%provide bonus, 30% give festival
allowance, 81% give xnnual increment and 28% provide other
facilities. Out of the various incentives, most of the estates
provide bonus follo\;u.ed by annual increment and festival
allowance.
3.3.9. Other FacilitiesIBenefits in Plantations
3.3.9.a. Rubber
Besides the monitory benefits, the rubber plantations
provide some non-monitory benefits. It also depends on the area
under cultivation. Certain large plantations, estates schools are
provided for the children of their employees. The details of such
benefitsffacilities are shown in table no.3.29.
Table No.3.29.0ther benefitstFacilities in Rubber estates
It is observed from the table, that 30% of the large
estates provide accomn~odation facilities to their employees, 28%
provide recreational facilities such club, library facilities, reading
room etc. In the case of transport facilities, 15% of the large
estates give such facility, 12% give education facilities and all of
them give medical benefits to their employees. In the case of
smallholdings, none of them provide accommodation and
transportation facility.;:%of them give recreational facility and
2% give educational facility. Here also 100% give medical
benefits.
3.3.9.6. Tea
Besides monitory benefits, estates provide various
facilities or non-monitory benefits to their employees such as
accommodation, recreational facilities, education facilities,
medical benefits etc. Most of the large estates provided
SI.No
1
2
3
(Primary Data)
Type of
estates
Large
Small
Total
14(28%) 8(15%)
IS 15 8
Education
6(12%)
1(2%)
7
Medical benefits
50(100%)
50(100%)
100
accommodation facilitic:~ to their employees because usually in
large estates, most of the employees are outstation employees
who are permanently 3ettled in plantations itself. The estates
provide them accommodation facilities called Layam. Certain
large estates establish estates schools for their employee's
children. Some estates l~rovide estates club, games room, library
facilities etc. The table 3.30 shows the details of the benefits
schemes provided by the estates.
From the table it is observed that all the estates both
Table No.3.3O.Other Benetits1 Facilities provided by Tea plantations
large and small provide (100%) provide medical benefits. 64% of
estates
Small
the large estates provide accommodation, 40% of them provide
recreational facilities.22~% of them provide both transportation
facilities and educational benefits. In the case of small estates,4%
provide both accommodation facilities and recreational
facilities,l% provide transportation facilities and 8% give some
(Primary data)
Recreation
20(40%)
2(4%)
22
educational facilties.Lik~zwise the large estates, 100% of the small
holding also provide medical benefits.
Transport
l2(25%)
1(2%)
13
Education
12(25%)
4(8%)
16
Medical
Benefits
50(100%)
50(100%)
100
3.3.9.c. Cardamom
The table 3.31 shows the details of facilitieslbenefits
provided by the cardamom estates.
Table No.3.3l.Other benefits1Facilities in Cardamom estates. SI.No I Type of 1 Accommodation / llecreation I Transport I Education / Medical 1 . . 1 estates 1 1 I I 1 Benefits
1. 1 Large 1 25(50%) 1 :!0(40%) / 6(12%) 1 15(30%) 1 50(100%)
50(100%)
(Primary Data)
From the table it is observed that 50% of the large
sector estates provide accommodation facilities. Recreational
facilities such as club, reading room etc is provided by 40%, 12%
provide transportation and 30% educational facilities. All estates
provided medical facilities.
In the case of small estates 2% provide
accommodation facilities, 2% provide recreational facilities, none
of them provide transpoltation and education facilities and all of
them provide medical facilities.
3.3.9.d. Comparison
Compared t83 rubber and cardamom estates, most of
the tea plantations provide accommodation facilities. All
plantations provide medical facilities. Table 3.32.shows the
details benefitstfacilities provided by the plantations.
Table No.3.32.0ther benefitslfacilities in Plantations
Accommodation Recreation Transportation Education
Cardamom 26 2 1 15 100 (Primary Data)
From the table, it is seen that other benefits /
facilities are more providetl by tea plantations. In the case of
accommodation facilities tea plantations are followed by
cardamom and rubber. In the case of recreation and educational
facilities also, cardamom plantations stands second place
followed by rubber, but ill providing transportation facilities,
rubber stands second place followed by cardamom. But in all type
of plantations provide medic.al benefits to their employees.
3.3.10. Trade Unionism
The trade unions are the representative spokesmen of
organised labour and may be organised to achieve several objects - -
to further the cause of their members. They are usuafy organisez-
to achieve between wages for the workers, better working
conditions, welfare and dev1:lopment.
3.3.10.1. Trade Unionism in India.
The trade unioli activity in India made a beginning
even before the end of 19th century. Early in 1875, Mr. Sorabjee
shapurjeeZ3 started an agitation to draw attention of the
Government to the deplorable condition women and child labour
in industry. In 1890 Mr. N.M. ~akande , '~ himself a worker,
organised a meeting of 10000 workers as result of which weekly
holiday was granted to workmen in Bombay textile and mill-
owners for regular monthly payment of wages. In 1897 the
Society of Railway Servants was established. This was registered
under the Companies Act. In 1907, a Postal Union was organised.
One of the most significant developments of the period
was the association of h4ahatma Gandhl with Ahemmedabad
23 . Sorubjess Shapu jee, earliest trade upon activitist of India
24 . N.M.Lakande, Textstyle worker of Bombay textiles.
Textile Labour Association (ATLA) in its struggle against the
employers of ~hernedabad.~:'
3.3.10.2. Trade Unions in Plantations
If 50% or above of the total employees are members
of any of the trade union, then such estates is treated as active
trade union influenced estatc:s.
3.3.10.a Rubber
In most of the large estates, trade union plays an
important role in fixing the wage scheme, incentives schemes. In
small plantations, there is less influence of trade union. Table 3.33
reveals the trade union (size wise) influence in rubber plantations.
Table No.3.33.Trade Union Influence in Rubber estates
estates influence influence Large
I
Small t1~(30%>%>1~-35(70%) t50(100%)~1
level=5 %)
From the table it can be seen 60% of the large estates
are highly influenced with trade union. But in small estates only
30% have influenced with trade union.
A Clu-square lest is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in trade unionism in large and small rubber estates.
Since the calculated value is greater than table value and the result
is rejection of null hypotheses and it is concluded that there is no
difference in tradeunionism in large and small estates.
i 3
25 S.D.Punekar, Tradc unionism in India, ,123
(Primary Data)(C.V. 4.09; T.V=3.84; Degrees of freedom=l; Significance
Total 45 55 100
3.3.10.6. Tea
The trade union movement came to the tea. industry
at a family late stage, in 1946. Workers in this industry were
unfamiliar with the methods of collective bargaining for the first
75 years of it existence. However, after the 1950's the trade union
movement spread rapidly and at present there is hardly a
plantation where workers itre not under the influence of the
several trade unions. The table 3.34 shows the trade union
influence of tea plantation workers on the basis of size of the
estates.
Table No.3.34 Trade union Influence in Tea plantations
2. I Small 1 5(10%) 1 45(90%) / 50(100%)
I I I I I I (Primary Data)(C.V=70.67; T.V. =3.84; Degrees of freedom=l; Level of
I
From the table i t is noticed that in large plantations,
3 1 Total 1 52
trade union influence is vay high (95%). In the case of small
estates only 10% are influenced with trade union.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho= there is no
difference in the trade unionism in large and small estates of tea.
48
Since the calculated value is much greater than table value; the
100
null hypothesis is rejected artd it is concluded that the trade union
system in large and small tea estates are different
3.3.10. c. Cardamom
In large cardarnom estates the influence of trade
union is very high. In conipany sector and government sector
plantations, the trade union influence is higher than others such
partnership and individual :states. Table 3.35 shows the trade
union influence in cardamon1 estates.
Table No.3.35.Trade unionism in Cardamom plantations
(primary Data)(C V=70 96, T V=3 84, Degrees of freedom=l, level of
slgnificance=5%)
From the table, it is observed that in large estates
86% are very much influenced with trade union, 8% of the small
estates are influenced by trade union
A Chi-square telst is conducted with Ho=there is no
&fference in the trade unionism in large and small estates. Since
the calculated value is greater than table value, the null hypothesis
is rejected that the trade union influence in large and small estates
are different.
3.3.10. d. Comparison
In all the three type of plantations, the size of the
estates and trade union arc: greatly correlated. Table No.3.36
shows the details of trade unionism in plantations.
Table No.3.36.Trade Union in Plantations
I S1.No I Type of / Trade Union 1 Non- I Total I
Cardamom 100 Total 157 143 300
(Primary data)(C.V=l4.31; T.V=5.9!1; Degrees of freedom=2; Level of Significance=5%)
From the table, it is seen that trade unionism is more
found in tea estates (52%) followed by cardamom estates
(47%).In rubber plantations only 45% are influenced with trade
union.
A Chi-square is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in trade union influence in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom
plantations. Since the calculated value is greater than table value,
the result is rejection of null hypphotheses and concluded that
trade union influences irk R, T &C are different.
3.3.11. Employees required for land preparation
3.3.11.a. Rubber Estates
The number of employees required for land
preparation for rubbe], estates depend on the geographical
standards. Compared to Southern parts of Kerala, Malabar area
requires more manpower for land preparation because the
geographical structure in Travancore area is more suited for
Rubber cultivation than Malabar area.26 In malabar area, 2.5-3
persons are required foi one hectare. But in Middle Kerala, 1-2
persons are required for one hectare.
3.3.11.6. Tea
In tea plantation more handwork is necessary for
preparing new planting as well as re-planting. It is noticed that
2.5-3 persons are required for preparation of land (per hectares).
This is depending on the geographical speciality.
- 26 Rubber,Kerala Bhasha Sahitya Inslitute,p35
3.3.11.c. Cardamom
Usually in (cardamom estates, one person is required
for maintaining 2.21 hectares. This is depending on the area or
geographical structure of the land.
3.3.11.d. Comparison
In rubber estates, 1-2 persons are required for
maintaining one hectare. In the case of tea estates, 2.5-3 persons
are required for maintaining one hectare, but in cardamom
plantatations, one person maintains 2.21 hectares.
3.3.12. Sources of Employees
3.3.12.a. Rubber
Usually in smallholdings, the employees are from
local places. Out station employees are more found in large
estates only. Table 3.37 shows the sources of employment in
rubber plantations.
Table No.3.37 Source of employment in Rubber estates
Outstation Outstation Total employees locally
settled
I 1 446(15%) 89(3%) 2970(100%)
I I I I I J (Primary Data)(C.V. =214.12; T.V. = =5.99; Degrees of freedom=2; Level of
In the case of large estates, 82% employees are local
employees and 15% are outstation employee. Only 3% employees
are locally settled outstation employees. In small estates, 96% are
local employees, 3% we outstation employees and only 1% are
locally settled outstatio~i employees. From the analysis it is clear
that local employees are more in small estates.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in the source of employees in large and small estates.
Since the calculated value is much greater than the table value,
the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the size of
the rubber estates have very much influence on the source of
employment system.
3.3.12.b. Tea
In tea plalitations there are less number of local
employees; locally settled outstation employees and outstation
employees are more found than other type of plantations. Here the
workers are born hereditary. Most of the employees are settled in
the plantations itself. Local employees are very few in tea estates.
The table 3.38 shows the details of the sources of employees.
Table No.3.38 Sources of Employees in Tea estates
I SI.No 1 T v ~ e o f 1 Local I Out station I Out station 1 Total I em lo ees local1 settled I - I . %$*E$%?- 1248$64%) jm60q
Significance =5%)
Small 1104(400/(') "'- Total
From the tiible it is observed that in large estates, only
12% of the total empl,~yees are from local places, 24% from out
station and 64% are locally settled outstation employees. In the
case of small estates, 40% employees are from local places, 30%
(Primary Data)(C.V. =832.1,17; T.V. =5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; Level of
828(30%)
1762
are outsiders and 30% are locally settled outsiders. From this it is
828(30%)
3317
2760(100%)
6650
clear that locally settled outside employees are more found in
large estates.
A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho=there is no
difference in the sourc: of employment in large and small tea
estates. Since the calculated value is greater than table value, the
null hypothesis is rejecl.ed and it is concluded that the source in
large and small tea estates are different.
3.3.12.c. Cardamom
In small Cardamom estates, local employees are more
found. Outstation employees and locally settled outstation
employees are more in large estates. The table 3.39 shows the
details of the sources of employment in cardamom estates.
Table No.3.39 Sources of employment in Cardamom estates
~ s L N 6 0 u t s t a t i o n s estates emplc~yees employees
(Primary Data)(C.V=1530; T.V. -5.991; Degrees of freedom=2; level of
significance=5%)
From the table it is seen that 20% employees in large
estates are local employees, 25% of them are outstation
employees and 55% of the total employees are locally settled
outstation workers. In the case of small estates, 56% of the total
employees are local e~nployees, 38% are outstation employees
and 6% are locally settled outstation employees. It is analysed that
local employees are more in small estates and in large estates
Large 566(20%)
Small 1142(56%)
Total 1708
locally settled outstatio~l employees are more.
Outstation locally settled
Total
707(25%)
775(38%)
I482
1557(55%)
123(6%)
1680
2830(100%)
2040(100%)
4870
A Chi-squa1.e is conducted with Ho= there is no
difference in the source of employment in large and small estates.
Since the calculated vahe is greater than the table value, the null
hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the source of
employment in large ancl small cardamom estates are different.
3.3.12. d. Comparison
In rubber esatates, local employees are found more
than in tea and cardamom estates. In tea estates, the numbers of
locally settled outstation employees are high because migrant
employees are more in tea estates. The table 3.40 shows the
details of source of employment system in plantations..
From the tat'le, it is analysed that local employees are
Table No.3.40 Source of em loyment system in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom
more found in rubber pl~ntations followed by Cardamom estates.
Outstation employees are more found in Cardamom and the
locally settled outstation employees are more in tea plantations.
Local plantations employees
Cardamom 1708
4 Total 7596
A Chi-square, test is conducted with Ho= there is no
difference in the source of employment in rubber, tea and
(Primary Data)(C.V=5298.16; 'T.V=9.488; Degrees of freedom=4; Significance
level=5%)
Outstation employees
505
1762
1482
3 749
cardamom plantations. Since the calculated value is much greater
than the table value, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is
Outstations locally settled
108
3317
1680
5105
Total
4930
6650
4870
16450
concluded that the source of employment system in different
plantations are different.
3.3.13. StrikeILabo~~r disputes in Plantations
Compared to other type of industries, strikelother
labour problems are very few in plantations fields. The major
reason for disputes in l~lantation industries is mainly relating to
wagesz7. The following are the details of strikelother disputes in
plantations.
3.3.13.a Rubber
There is less number of strikesllabour disputes in
rubber plantations coml~ared to other industries during the last 3
years. Table No.3.41 shows the details of strikesllabour disputes
in rubber plantations.
12% is affected with strike and other labour problems. But in the
Table No.3.41 StrikelLock-outlother dispute in Rubber estates
case of small estates ordy8% is affected with strike other labour
problems. In large estates, strikes are more affected in
estates
Large 6(12%)
Small
Total 10
government estates and company form of estates. A Chi-square
test is conducted with Ho=there is no difference in the strikelother
(Primary Data)(C.V=. 444; T.'J=3.841; Degrees of freedom=l; Significance
level=5%)
From the tlble, it is observed that in large estates,
No Dispute
44(88%)
46(92%)
90
labour problems in large and small rubber estates. Since the
Total
50
50
100
calculated value is less than the table value, the hypothesis is
accepted and it is concluded that there is no difference in the
strike/other labour disputes' in large and small rubber estates.
3.3.13. b. Tea
The labour disputeslstrikes are more found in large
estates. Usually the main reason for disputes is relating to wage
policy of the management. Besides there are other reasons such as
lack of basic facilities like accommodations, medical facilities etc.
The table 3.42 shows the details of labour dispute in tea estates.
Table No.3.42 Strike/L,abour dispute in Tea estates
Type of Strikelother No Dispute =I-....i;qTI I I I t
1. I I I I
____i___- (Primary Data)(C.V=2.98; T.V. =3.841; Degrees of Freedom=l; Significance
I I I I
level=5%)
From the table it is clear that during the past 3 years
only 20% large estates are suffered from strike 1 other disputes. In
the case of small estate? 10% of them are suffered from strike I
Large
5(10%) 1 45(90%) 1 50 2.
disputes. A Chi-square test is conducted with Ho= there is no
10(20%) 1 40(80%) 1 50
Small
3.
difference in the strikelother labour disputes in large and small tea
Total
estates. Since the calcu1:ited value is less than the table value, the
100 15
null hypotheses is accepted and it is concluded that there is no
difference in strike1 other labour dispute in large and small tea
95
3.3.13.c. Cardamom
Compared to other type of plantations, there is less
number of strikes in carclamom plantations. The table 3.43 shows
the details of the labour ciispute on cardamom estates.
Table No.3.43 Strikenock-ouxmther labour dispute in Cardamom estates
I I I I
1 I Large I 5(10%) 45(90%) 50 1 S1.No Type
estates
I I I 1
(Primary Data)(C.V=.542; T.V. =3.841; Degrees of freedom=l; Significane level=5%)
From the table it is found that in large estates the
2 I Small I 3(6%) I I I 1
percentage of strikelother disputes in past 3 years are 10%. In the
Strikelother Disputes
3 1 Total 1 8
case of small estates, only 6% estates are affected by strikelother
47(94%)
disputes. A chi-square test is conducted with Ho= there is no
No Dispute
50
92
difference in the strikelother labour disputes in large and small
cardamom estates Since the calculated value is less than the table
Total
100
value, the null hypothesis is accepted and concluded that there no
difference in strikelother disputes in large and small cardamom
estates.
3.3.13.d. Comparisol~
The table 3.44 shows the details of strikelother
disputes in rubber, tea ar d cardamom plantations.
Table No.3.44 Strikelother Disputes in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom
Total
100 100 100 3 00
S1.No Type of lantations Rubber
Cardamom 4 Total
(Primary Data)(C.V=2.653; T.\I=5.991; DF=2; Sig=5%)
Strikelother Disputes
10 15 8
33
No Disputes
90 85 92
267
From the table, it is seen than, compared to other
plantations, strikeslother disputes are more in tea estates (15%)
followed by rubber (10%') and cardamom (8%). A Chi-square test
is conducted with Ho=there are no difference strikelother labour
problems in rubber, tea and cardamom. Since the calculated value
is less than table value, the null hypotheses is accepted and it is
concluded that there is no difference in the strikelother labour
problems in rubber, tea and cardamom plantations.
3.3.14. Scientific Human Resource Management and Productivity
In order lo measure the relationship between
scientific management practices in personnel aspects and
productivity of each crop, correlation test conducted by
considering three variables such as personnel department in
estates, personnel manager in estates and training facilities in the
estate. If an estate possesses all these variables, it is treated as
fully scientifically managed estates and assign three points. If two
or any one of the variables possessed, then two points are
assigned to such estates (Partial scientific management) and none
of the above variables are possessed, such estates will be assigned
one point. (Non-scientific management). This is the criteria for
conducting correlation t:st.
3.3.14. a. Rubber
The details of the correlation test conducted in rubber
plantations are given in table 3.45.
Table No.3.45 Correlation behveen HRM and Productivity in Rubber estates
(Primary data)
From the ..able, it is observed that 31 estates have
full scientific management (3points), 43 have partial scientific
management (2points) and 26 estates have no scientific
management in human resource aspects. The correlation value is
7156 and it is concluded that the scientific human resource
management and protluctivity of rubber estates are greatly
correlated.
3.3.14. b.Tea
(Primary data)
The correlation value is .759 and it is concluded that
the scientific human resources management in tea estates and the
productivity of tea are directly correlated.
3.3.14.c. Cardamom
Table No.3.47 Correlation between scientific HRM and productivity in cardamom estates
(Primary data)
The correlation value is ,7558.So it is observed that
the scientific managerrlent in personnel aspects in cardamom
estates and the productivity of cardamom are positively
correlated.
3.3.15. Scientific Human Resource Management in Rubber, Tea and Cardamom.
The scientific management practices relating to
personnel aspects are different in rubber, tea and cardamom. The
scientific management sractices in human resource aspects are
measured by considering three variables- personnel department,
personnel manager ancl training system in the estates. If all
variables are possessed by estates, then three points are assigned
to such estates, if two or any of them are possessed, then two
points are assigned to such estates and if none of them are
possessed, then one point is assigned to such estates. The details
of the scientific human management practices in rubber, tea and
cardamom are given in hble 3.46,
Table.No.3.48 Scientific human resources management in plantations
From the tasle, it is observed that 31% of the rubber
Rubber management
vr- 24
4 Total 100
estates have full scientific personnel management followed by
tea(28%) and cardamorn(22%).45% of the rubber estates have
Tea
(Primary Data)(C.V=7.877; T.'l=9.488; DF=5%; Sig=4)
28
36
36
100
partial scientific management and 24% have non scientific
Cardamom
22
36
42
100
Total
8 1
117
102
300
management in respect of personnel aspects. In the case of tea,
36% have partial scientilic human resource management and 36%
have not. In the case O F cardomom, 36% have partial scientific
management and 42% Pave not. It is observed that compared to
tea and cardomom, rubber estates have more scientific
management in respect cf human resource aspects.
A chi-squarr: test is conducted with Ho= there is no
difference in the management practices in human resources
aspects followed in rlbber, tea and cardamom. Since the
calculated value is less twn the table value, the null hypothesis is
accepted and it is concluded that there is no difference in the
management practices in human resources aspects followed in
rubber, tea and cardamom.
In order to test the effect of scientific human
resource management and productivity of rubber, tea and
cardamom, multiple regression test is conducted and from the
result it is observed that, human resource management practices
in tea estates have more significance with productivity than
rubber and cardamom. (The details of the test are shown in
Appendix 3)