20
CHAPTER - II
DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF INCOME-
TAX IN INDIA
2.1 Introduction:
Income-tax is a tax of Central Government which is collected by
taxing income earned by the persons. For the purpose, the Central
Government has passed a separate Act i.e. Income-Tax Act, 1961 under
which the procedures of taxing the incomes of the persons and collection
of income-tax has been envisaged. The Act gives definition of ‘person’
and explains how its residential status should be decided. Tax incidence
on an assessee depends on his residential status. The Central Government
under its yearly financial budget decides the rates of income-tax to be
charged on taxable income of ‘person’. For the proper administration and
collection of income-tax, the government has formed a separate
department known as Income-Tax Department which is solely
responsible for collection of income-tax and completing all the
procedures in this regard.
2.2 Indian Tax System
India has a well developed three tired tax structure. It comprises of the
Central Government, the State Governments and Local Bodies (includes
Gram-Panchayat, Municipal Corporations, and Corporations). In
accordance with the provisions of Indian Constitution the power to levy
and collect taxes is entrusted to these bodies. Accordingly these bodies
are empowered to levy and collect following taxes.
21
� Central Government -
� Income-Tax (except agricultural income-tax)
� Corporate Tax
� Custom Duties
� Central Excise Duty
� Sales Tax
- Value Added Tax (on inter-state sale of goods)
- Service Tax
� Tax on Capital Gain
� Securities Transaction Tax
� Service Tax
� State Governments -
� Sales Tax (on inside state sale of goods)
� Land Revenue
� Taxes on Agricultural Income
� Stamp Duty (on transfer of property)
� State Excise (on manufacture of alcohol)
� Duty on Entertainment
� Profession Tax
� Local Bodies -
� Property Tax or Building Tax
� Octroi
� Tax on Markets
� Tax or user charges for utilities (e.g. water supply, drainage,
etc.)
22
2.3 Historical Review
India is presumed to be one of the oldest civilizations of the world.
Various references from the Hindu dharmashastra and its literature has
shown that there was a taxation in one or another form from very
beginning of the civilization, though the nature, scope and objectives
were different at different stages of its development. The evaluation of
income-tax in India can be studied in the following stages:
• Vedic Period
During Vedic period there are references which show that
taxes were collected in one form or another. King was the
sovereign authority to levy and collect tax. Tax collected from
public formed part of State’s Revenue. The references about
sacrifice, argument for progressive taxation are found in the
Institute of ‘Manu’. Near about 1200 B.C. Manu had said that
equal severity upon every individual is required to make the burden
of taxes equal1.
In those days the largest share of public revenue was from a
share of the agricultural produce. Certain taxes on commerce, a
trifling were levied on street traders. No references of imposition of
super income-tax found in this period.
• Mauryan Period
During Mauryan Period, taxation had got importance for
meeting the expenses of administration. The well-known ‘Kautilya
Neeti’ was presented by Arya Chanakya (Kautilya) in which the
reference of a well planned and systematic approach to levy and
collect taxes for the state exchequer is found. Land tax, taxes on
houses in cities, contributions for maintenance of troops during
23
war, duties on sale of goods in markets, taxes on imports and
exports and other taxes on incomes of persons engaged in
professions other than agriculture were some of the taxes
introduced by Kautilya2.
• Period of Kings and the Rulers:
During the days of kings and the rulers taxes were not
collected for the development of the economy, but were imposed
and collected much for personal needs of the kings and
maintenance of army for internal peace and protection from foreign
aggression.
• Mughal Period:
During Mughal period demand on agricultural produce was
the main source of State’s Revenue. It was 1/5th of the Gross
Produce. Other revenue heads were import duties, State’s share in
the spoils of the war, imposts on mines and treasure troves, etc.3
‘Aurangazeb’, one of the Mughal Emperor taxed ‘ziziya’
Kar on all kaffirs (non-believers).
Evidences found show that the Mughal Emperor ‘Akbar’,
had taxed boatmen for the waves they made on the river water.
It reveals that indigenous governments ruled in India were
well familiar with direct taxation.
• Period of East India Company:
During the period of East India Company, land revenue was
the main source of revenue. During this period tax system was
designed to protect and enlarge the interest of the East India
Company and the British Crown.
24
• British Colonial Period:
In India, Sir James Wilson for the first time, imposed
‘Income-Tax; in the year 1860. This tax was introduced to meet the
losses suffered by Military Mutiny of 1857. At that time charging
income-tax was very simple matter. Thereafter various minor
amendments were made to ‘Income-Tax’. And finally in the year
1886 a new ‘Act’ was passed which properly framed ‘Income-Tax
System’. Under the act income-tax was charged on a flat rate of 5%
over the income Rs. 2000/- with a rate of 4% on salaries between
Rs. 500/- to Rs. 2000/-. At the same rate ‘Interest on Securities’
was also taxed.4
In 1916, eight different rates of tax were prescribed for different
income groups. In 1917, additional income-tax was introduced as
‘Super tax’. A peculiar feature of this Act was the tax on the
income of a year is calculated and collected in the same year itself.
However, in 1922, the All India Income-Tax Committee
recommended and passed ‘The Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922’.
Under this Act, in 1924 the Central Board of Revenue was
established. In 1939 considerable and significant amendments were
made to this Act. One of the important amendments is ‘slab rate
system’ for charging income-tax was introduced on the
recommendations of the ‘Income-Tax Enquiry Committee (1936).5
4. Period of Independence
� Period of mixed economy: (1947-1991)
After Independence India has accepted mixed economy
structure for its economic development under which five year plans
were introduced for the purpose of economic development and
equal distribution of wealth among the people.
25
Though various amendments were made in Income-Tax Act,
the basic structure of income-tax was remained technically
unaltered. The taxation imposed was built on British Model.
Therefore after independence in 1947, it was expected to undergo a
fundamental change.
After Independence India had become an independent
democratic republic nation. It is governed in terms of the
constitution which came into force on 26th Jan, 1950.
In 1953-54 the Taxation Enquiry Commission estimated tax
evasion of Rs. 50 crores, while Prof. Nicholas Kaldor estimated it
as Rs. 200-300 crores. Kaldor suggested to thorough and
comprehensive reform of Indian tax system. Accordingly in 1956
Indian Government referred Income-Tax Act, 1922 to Law
Commission. In the mean time the government appointed the
Direct Taxes Administration Enquiry Committee to simplify the
Act and to prevent tax evasion. Afterwards The Central Board of
Revenue appointed a separate committee to consider the reports
both of the Law commission as well as the Direct Taxes
Administration Enquiry Committee. After the study of both the
reports in April 1961 in consultation with the Ministry of Law, the
Income-Tax Bill, 1961 was introduced in Parliament which was
passed in September, 1961 and the Income-Tax Act, 1961 came
into force.6
� Period of New Economic Reforms: ( after 1991)
Income-Tax Act, 1961 is in operation for about half of a
century with additions, alterations, modifications, insertions,
omissions, explanations and with supporting Schedules to the Act
for various reasons like requirement for additional revenue,
26
simplification of tax law, decisions at a number of court cases,
changing economic and political situation, recommendations made
by a number of Enquiry Committee and economics.
Since year 1991, Indian tax system has under gone a drastic
change in accordance with liberal economic policy and WTO
commitments of the country. The government set up a special
committee, the Raja Chelliah Committee on Tax Reforms, to
review the country's tax system. This committee recommended, to
reduce customs and excise duties, to lower corporate tax rates, to
levy taxes on services like insurance, telephones etc., to simplify
income-tax return filing procedures. Government approved various
committees and commissions with various goals and objectives.
Marginal tax rate and number of rate categories were reduced since
1991-92 and better compliance is to be achieved. In 1996-97, MAT
(minimum alternate tax) is introduced due to which ‘zero tax’
companies were minimized. Number of company assessees were
increased with increase in direct tax revenue to government. TDS
(tax deducted at source) is also an important reform due to which
‘hard to tax’ group came under tax net.7
The performance of income-tax can be evaluated, in relation
to direct tax collection and number of assessees. The following
table no. 2.1 demonstrates the trends in direct tax collection
classifying the same into corporate tax, personal income-tax and
other direct tax.
27
Table No. 2.1
Direct Taxes Collection
(amounts in crores Rs.)
Actual Collection Financial
Year Corporate Tax Income-Tax Other Direct Tax
Total
1996-97 18567 18234 2094 38895
1997-98 20016 17101 11163 48280
1998-99 24529 20240 1831 46600
1999-00 30692 25655 1612 57959
2000-01 35696 31764 845 68305
2001-02 36609 32004 585 69198
2002-03 46172 36866 50 83088
2003-04 63562 41386 140 105088
2004-05 82680 49268 823 132771
2005-06 101277 63630 301 165208
2006-07 144318 85548 315 230181
2007-08 192911 118904 387 312202
2008-09 213823 123967 422 338212
Source:
http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/archive/AHBUPD1901_2010.pdf
From table no. 2.1 it can be seen that income-tax revenue to
total tax revenue of the Government, is increasing continuously.
Per capita tax revenue is also improving steadily. It can be seen
that personal income-tax was reduced to Rs.17101 crores in 1997-
98 from Rs.18234 crores in 1996-97 due to ‘tax evasion’ cases.
Remedial actions were taken for ‘tax evasion’ and thereafter
personal income-tax is increasing continuously. The foregoing
table no. 2.2 shows that with the increase in direct tax revenue of
the government, number of assessees also has gone up by 2.80
28
times between the period 1996-97 and 2008-09. Total number of
assessees were 1,16,43,543 in the year 1996-97 which are
increased to 3,26,50,627 in the year 2008-09. The details are as
under:
Table No. 2.2
Number of Effective Assessees
Year Co. Individual H.U.F. Firms Trusts Others Total
1996-97 227228 9761426 412470 1158319 49629 34471 11643543
1997-98 274319 11194953 437251 1172647 51865 36701 13167736
1998-99 295327 15135956 469730 1228023 83847 41328 17254211
1999-00 309627 17653745 507843 1272217 87165 46427 19877024
2000-01 334261 20662926 553194 1336861 63999 51035 23002276
2001-02 349185 23734413 607519 1378706 97272 58784 26225879
2002-03 365124 25935556 644489 1345232 117304 57224 28464929
2003-04 372483 26624224 654848 1338613 154276 57952 29202396
2004-05 373165 24792990 620468 1235373 71375 65190 27158561
2005-06 382021 27370659 642759 1234424 74543 58077 29762483
2006-07 398014 29355248 761439 1241642 75610 71184 31903137
2007-08 498066 30868243 780853 1368373 74077 73189 33662801
2008-09 327674 30101260 768845 1310849 71145 70854 32650627
Source: http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/archive/AHBUPD1901_2010.pdf
Due to economic reforms growth rate of economic development
has increased. Standard of living of people is also increased as their
earnings are increased. From the table no.2.2 it can be easily observed
that number of assessees are increasing continuously. Majority of these
assessees are availing services from tax consultants in compliance of tax
matters.
The present study is restricted to individual, partnership firm and
company assessees. Income-tax related to individual assessee is called as
29
‘Personal Income-Tax’ and income-tax related to company assessee is
called as ‘Corporate Tax’. Tax rates in details are as under:
2.4 Personal Income-Tax
The income-tax is levied and collected according to the residential
status of an assessee. While levying income-tax the principles of
progressive, regressive or proportional are used. A progressive tax levies
progressively higher tax rates as earnings reach higher levels. A
regressive tax levies income up to a certain amount, e.g. tax on first Rs.
1,00,000/- earned. Flat tax method taxes all earnings at the same rate. For
different types of income different methods of taxation may be used.
In India up to 31st March 1939, ‘higher the income, higher the rate’
i.e. tax is to be charged on whole amount of total income at the rate
applicable to the step in which the total income falls. Thereafter ‘Slab
System of Taxation’ method is adopted. In this method income is divided
in different slabs and there is a separate rate of tax for separate slab.
Initially in this ‘slab system’ two sets of income groups were provided
one pertaining to ‘income-tax-payers’ and the other pertaining to the
‘super tax-payers’ where in the tax-payers were divided into income-tax-
payers whose total income was below Rs. 25,000/- and super tax-payers
whose income was above Rs. 25,000/- and charged accordingly at two
separate rates.8 This system continued until the assessment year 1965-66
when super tax was merged into income-tax and nine slabs were
provided. The first slab was of income below Rs. 5,000/- and maximum
tax of 65 % is for income above Rs. 70,000/-. This Tax structure
continued till the assessment year 1968-69. In 1969-70 slabs and slab
rates were revised. For this year maximum marginal rate of 75 % was
prescribed for incomes exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-. In 1971-72, first time
‘NIL’ slab was introduced. But the marginal rate of income-tax including
30
surcharge was the highest at 97.75 % on income exceeding Rs.
2,00,000/-. In assessment year 1975-76 again slabs and slab rates were
revised on the recommendations of ‘The Direct Taxes Enquiry
Committee’ headed by Justice K.N. Wanchoo. Marginal rate of tax
including surcharge has been reduced to 67.5% and continued to be same
till assessment year 1984-85. This rate was reduced to 61.875% in 1985-
86 and to 50% in assessment year 1986-878.
Though the rates of taxation imposed were very high, the yield was
not proportionately high. Tax evasion was the principal reason. Salaried
group, who cannot conceal its income, was the only honest tax-payer
group. Due to high rates of income-tax economy witnessed extensive tax
evasion and rise of black money. As such, as a policy matter there has
been continuous reduction in income-tax rates. Policy was adopted during
last two decades to avoid tax evasion and rise in black money.
In the assessment year 1992-93, the exemption limit was Rs.
22,000/- and maximum 50% tax was levied on the income above Rs.
1,00,000/-. In 1995-96, the exemption limit was Rs. 35000/-. In
assessment year 1998-99 exemption limit was raised to Rs. 40,000/- and
above Rs. 1,50,000/- 30% tax was levied. The exemption limit was raised
to Rs. 50000/- in 1999-2000. This limit was again raised to Rs. 1,00,000/-
in 2005-06. In the assessment year 2008-09 exemption limit was Rs.
1,10,000/- and maximum 30% tax was levied on the income above Rs.
2,50,000/-. In the year 2009-10 exemption limit was Rs. 1,50,000/- and
maximum 30% tax was calculated on the income above Rs. 5,00,000/-.
For assessment year 2010-11 exemption limit was 1,60,000/- and the
maximum tax was of 30% on the income above Rs. 5,00,000/-. For
assessment year 2011-12 exemption limit was 1,60,000/- and the
maximum tax was of 30% on the income above Rs. 8,00,000/-. In
31
addition to this certain percent of tax on total tax of the assessee is levied
as super tax and education cess9.
2.5 Income-tax rates for partnership firms:
In Income-Tax Act, ‘firm’, ‘partner’ and ‘partnership’ have the
separate meaning, but while calculating the taxable income of the firm,
any interest, salary, commission, bonus or other remuneration paid to any
partner is not allowed as deduction. Firm’s total income shall be
calculated as like ‘profits and gains of business or profession’. For this
purpose Act contains certain deductions which are expressly allowable
from firm’s income. The Act also contains certain expenses which are
expressly disallowable. With these there are some other deductions which
are allowable on the basis of general commercial principles. Income
earned by the firm from the source other than business income is to be
added in the income of the firm and the total taxable income of the firm
can be achieved. Whole amount of profit earned by the firm is taxable.
Previously there were slabs for rate of income-tax for partnership
firms too. For assessment years 1977-78 to 1979-80 first Rs. 1,000/- were
tax free, next Rs. 24,000/- were taxed at 5% and income above Rs. one
lakh was taxed at 24%. Thereafter in assessment years 1980-81 to 1982-
83 Rs.10,000/- were tax free. Nowadays all the firms are taxable at flat
rate of income-tax. Rate of income-tax for partnership firm from
assessment year 1993-94 to 2011-1210
are as follows:
Table No. 2.3
Income-Tax Rates for Partnership Firm
A.Y.1993-94 to 2011-12
Year Rate of Income-Tax
1993-94 to 1997-98 40%
1998-99 to 2005-06 35%
2006-07 to 2011-12 30%
32
2.6 Corporate Tax:
Corporate tax is the most important tax of all direct taxes imposed
by central government. It is a tax imposed on the income of the
companies. The rates of corporation tax were different for domestic
companies and foreign companies. There are no slabs as in personal
income-tax. Income of the companies is taxed at flat rate.
The rates of corporate tax were quite high till the year 1991, but
after adoption of new economic policies in the year 1991, to stimulate
growth process and to achieve foreign investments, rates of corporate tax
were reduced gradually. During the assessment years 1992-93 to 1994-95
rate of income-tax was 45%, which was reduced to 40% in 1995-96. This
rate was continued up to assessment year 1997-98. In the assessment year
1998-99 this rate was reduced to 35% and again in 2005-06 the rate of
corporate tax was reduced to 30 % and till then it was pegged at 30%.11
2.7 Tax Revenue of the Central Government:
The tax revenue collected by the Central Government of India
contains both types of taxes i.e. direct tax and indirect tax. Direct taxes
include share of income-tax along with the proportionate share of each
type of tax in total tax revenue of the Government. The details of last 40
years can be seen from the following table no. 2.4
33
Table No. 2.4
Central Government Tax Trends: 1972-73 to 2011-12
(amounts in Rs. crores)
Year Total
Direct Tax
% in
Total Tax
Total
Indirect Tax
% in
Total Tax
Total Central
Tax Revenue
1972-73 752 21.84 2691 78.16 3443
1977-78 1742 24.67 5319 75.33 7060
1982-83 2723 20.92 10294 79.08 13017
1987-88 4100 14.64 23915 85.36 28015
1992-93 12075 22.34 41969 77.66 54044
1997-98 27172 28.40 68500 71.60 95672
2002-03 61612 38.86 96932 61.14 158544
2003-04 76590 40.96 110392 59.04 186982
2004-05 95944 42.68 128854 57.32 224798
2005-06 120692 44.66 149572 55.34 270264
2006-07 169738 48.33 181444 51.67 351182
2007-08 231509 52.68 208001 47.32 439547
2008-09 248152 55.98 195169 44.02 443319
2009-10 271623 59.50 184913 40.50 456536
2010-
11(RE)
314606 55.81 249080 44.19 563685
2011-
12(BE)
373413 56.20 291045 43.80 664457
Note:
i) Total Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes include Other Taxes.
ii) Data for 2010-11 are Revised Estimate and Data for 2011-12 are
Budgeted Estimates.
Sources:
http://fincomindia.nic.in/ShowContentOne.aspx?id=27&Section=1
34
2.8 Income-Tax Administration
From very imposition of income-tax by British rulers in India in the
year 1860, the income-tax was administered and collected by the
Provincial Government till the year 1922. In 1922, when a separate
Income-Tax Act was passed, separate provisions for administration were
made. It was made under which ‘Board of Inland Revenue’ was provided
to perform the duty of making rules and administering the tax. In 1924,
this Board was replaced by ‘Central Board of Revenue’12
. With the
growing complexity of income-tax administration ‘Central Board of
Direct Taxes’ was constituted under ‘Central Board of Revenue, 1963.
‘Central Board of Direct Taxes is the apex body in the Administration of
income-tax. It works under the Finance Ministry. It executes all those
functions prescribed under the Act as well as entrusted by the Finance
Ministry. It consists of a number of members appointed by the Central
Government. It has certain powers conferred upon it by the Income-Tax
Act. The board for proper administration of the Act may issue such
orders, instructions and directions to other income-tax authorities as it
may deem fit. For efficient management of work of assessment and
collection of revenue it may issue general or special orders to be followed
by Income-Tax Authority.
Functional Area:
The Board has divided its functions under three subordinate
authorities viz. administration, assessment and judicial for its proper
working. Table No. 2. 5 given below shows the hierarchy of authorities.13
35
Table No. 2.5
Central Board of Direct Taxes
For Administration For Assessment For appeals
Director General of Chief Commissioner of
Income-Tax Income-Tax
Director of Commissioner of
Income-Tax Income-Tax
Joint Director of Joint Commissioner of
Income-Tax Income-Tax
Assistant Director of Assistant Commissioner Commissioner of
Income-Tax of Income-Tax (A.O.) Income-Tax(Appeals)
Income-Tax Officer (A.O.) Joint Commissioner of
Tax recovery Officer Income-Tax (Appeals)
Inspector of Income-Tax
36
Administration:
Administrative authorities look into the matter of proper
administration of Income-Tax Act, 1961.
Assessment:
Assessment authorities make assessment, collects tax revenue.
Appeals:
Judicial authorities hear and dispose off the appeals against
judgments of Income-Tax Officers.
Director General (DGIT) or Chief Commissioner (CCIT)
Director General of Income Tax (DGIT) or Chief Commissioner of
Income Tax (CCIT) are appointed by Central Government and perform
the functions assigned by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. They can
appoint income-tax authorities below the rank of Assistant
Commissioner. They can exercise powers of a court for making any
enquiry or investigation into concealment.
Commissioner of Income-Tax or Directors of Income-Tax
Commissioner of Income-Tax or Directors of Income-Tax are
appointed by the Central Government. They can appoint, assign
jurisdiction and functions to Inspecting Assistant commissioners and
Income-Tax Officers and can give instructions to them. They have
powers like making enquiry, transferring of cases, search and seizure etc.
Joint Commissioners
Joint Commissioners are also appointed by central government.
Their main duty is to detect tax evasion and supervise subordinate
37
officers. They have powers of making enquiry, call information, survey,
search and seizure etc.
Commissioners (For Appeals)
The Commissioners of Income-Tax (Appeals) is an appellate
authority. It is appointed by the Central Government for disposal of
Appeals. They have powers regarding discovery of evidence, call for
information, inspect registers of companies etc.
Income-Tax Officers
Class-I Income-Tax Officers are appointed by the central
government and class-II officers are appointed by Commissioner of
Income-Tax. They perform their functions within the jurisdiction of
Assistant Directors or Assistant Commissioners. They have power of
discovery and production of evidence, search and seizure, survey, make
assessment, grant refund etc.
Inspectors of Income-Tax
Inspectors of Income-Tax are appointed by the Commissioner of
Income-Tax. They are subordinate to Income-Tax officer and other
higher authorities under whom they work and perform functions assigned
to them by superiors.
2.9 Important Concepts and Definitions:
1. Assessment Year
Assessment year means a period of 12 months commencing on
1st April and ending on 31
st March of the subsequent year. Income
earned in financial year is taxed in assessment year. Assessment year
succeeds the financial year.
38
2. Accounting Year / Financial year / Previous Year
Accounting Year or Financial year is also known as ‘previous
year’. It means the year immediately preceding the assessment year.
Generally previous year consists period of 12 months, only in case of
newly set up during the financial year business, this period shall be
beginning on the date of setting up of the business and ending with
the said financial year.
3. ‘Assessee’ :
An ‘assessee’ is a person:
i. From whom any tax is payable under the Act
ii. From whom any other sum of money (such as interest or penalty) is
payable under the Act
iii. Against whom any proceedings under the Act have been initiated for
the assessment of his income or loss or of amount of refund due to
him
iv. Who is deemed to be an assessee i.e. representative assessee such as
guardian of a minor or manager of a lunatic or agent of a non-
resident
v. Who is deemed to be an assessee in default i.e. a person who has
failed to discharge any obligation under the Act e.g. deduction of tax
at source, payment of advance tax etc.
In simple terms an ‘assessee’ is a person who is liable to pay
income-tax, interest and / or penalty for his own income or income
of other person. The term ‘assessee’ also includes the person
whoever failed to follow any obligation under the Act.
39
4. Assessment
Term ‘assessment’ is not defined in Income-Tax Act, 1961. The
Act only states that it includes ‘re-assessment’.
Assessment means computation of total income earned or loss
suffered by the assessee during the financial year and the amount of
tax payable by him or refund payable to him.
5. ‘Income’:
According to section 2(24) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 ‘income’
includes:
i. Profit and gains
ii. Dividend
iii. Voluntary contributions received by charitable institutions, religious
trusts, research associations etc.
iv. Any allowance granted to employees
v. The value of any perquisite or profit in lieu of salary taxable under
the ‘salaries’
vi. The value of benefit or perquisite obtained by a director or a person
substantially interested in a company
vii. Income chargeable under the head ‘profits and gains of business or
profession’
viii. Capital gain
ix. Profit and gains of insurance carried on by Mutual Insurance
Company or by a co-operative society, computed in accordance with
provisions of section 44 of the Act.
x. Winning from lotteries, betting, cross-word puzzles, gambling, horse
race etc. It includes prizes won in TV / game shows
xi. Employers contribution to provident fund or super-annuation fund or
other such fluids
40
xii. Any sum received under Keyman Insurance Scheme including bonus
xiii. The contribution made by the central government in the previous
year to the account of employees under a pension scheme referred to
in section 80 CCD
xiv. Cash gifts received from non-relatives exceeding Rs. 50000/-. From
01-10-2009 immovable property, movable property transferred
without or with inadequate consideration is taxable in the hands of
recipient (donee)
The definition of ‘income’ lists the items which are treated as
income. This definition is not an exhaustive, but an inclusive one. It
means any other kind of earnings not mentioned in the list of income
is also to be included and to be treated as income.
6. ‘Person’ :
The term ‘person’ includes -
i. An Individual
ii. A Hindu Undivided Family
iii. Partnership Firm
iv. A Company
v. An Association of Persons
vi. A Local Authority
vii. Every Artificial Judicial Person
The definition of ‘person’ given by the Act is very simple. It
includes natural human beings as ‘individuals’ and other persons
who are established under various Acts.
Legal status of the assessee i.e. whether the assessee is a firm or
company or artificial judicial person etc., is very important in
41
determining assessee’s tax liability. The tax rates are different
for different legal status of the assessees.
7. Total Income:
According to Income-Tax Act, incomes earned are classified and
assessed under five heads viz;
i. Income from salary
ii. Income from house property
iii. Profits and gains from business or profession
iv. Capital gain and
v. Income from other sources
Total of these five income heads is called as ‘Gross Total Income’.
8. Taxable Income:
After claiming deductions under chapter VI-A from gross total
income, ‘Taxable Income’ of the assessee is arrived at. This is
explained in the following table no. 2.6
42
Table No. 2.6
Computation of Taxable Income
Name of the Assessee :
Status :
P.A.N. :
Assessment Year :
Previous Year :
Particulars Rs.
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
Income from salary
Income from house property
Profits and gains from business or profession
Capital gain
Income from other sources
Gross Total Income
Less: Deductions under chapter VI-A (if any)
TAXABLE TOTAL INCOME ***
43
REFERENCES:
1. Vinay Kumar (1988), Tax System in India and Role of Income-Tax,
Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi. (page 25)
2. National Website of Income-Tax Department of India
3. Vinay Kumar (1988), Tax System in India and Role of Income-Tax,
Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi. (page 25)
4. Mehrotra H.C.(1969), Income-Tax Law and Accounts, Sahitya
Bhavan, Agra-3 (page 1)
5. Lakhotia Ram Niwas (1974), Elements of Indian Income-Tax, Asha
Publishing House, Calcutta-19 (page 1)
6. Harjeet Kaur (1992), Taxation and Development Finance in India,
Classical Publishing Company, New Delhi. (page 129)
7. htpp:// www.indolink.com/consulate/iebo/tax.htm
8. Vinay Kumar (1988), Tax System in India and Role of Income-Tax,
Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi. (page 136)
9. Ready Reckoners:
� Shri. V.G. Mehta, Shri. N.V. Mehta (For A.Y. 1977-78, A.Y.
1979-80 to 86-87), Shri Kuber Publishing House, Bombay
� Raman Bissa (For A.Y. 2005-06), Taxcom (India), Jodhpur
(page 397-399)
10. Ready Reckoners:
� Mehta V.G., Mehta N.V.(For A.Y. 1977-78, A.Y. 1979-80 to
86-87), Shri Kuber Publishing House, Bombay
� Raman Bissa (For A.Y. 2005-06), Taxcom (India), Jodhpur
(page 399)
11. Ready Reckoner:
� Raman Bissa (For A.Y. 2005-06), Taxcom (India), Jodhpur
(page 399-400)
44
12. Vinay Kumar (1988), Tax System in India and Role of Income-Tax,
Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi. (page 166)
13. Herekar P.M., Kulkarni S.S. (2010), A Simple Approach to Income-
Tax (A.Y. 2010-11), Phadake Prakashan, Kolhapur (page 462)
45