+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their ...

Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their ...

Date post: 05-Nov-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
37
Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle Regulatory Challenges in Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Topic 2: Measurement and characterization of nanomaterials Topical Scientific Workshop, ECHA, Helsinki, 2014-10-23/24 Michael Stintz Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering
Transcript

Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle

Regulatory Challenges in Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Topic 2: Measurement and characterization of nanomaterials Topical Scientific Workshop, ECHA, Helsinki, 2014-10-23/24

Michael Stintz Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 2

First defined – Release from powders

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 3

Published studies on nano-object release into air suffer more or less from three problems, i.e. a consistent terminology, standardized metrological procedures and the kind of data evaluation. Thus, a quantitative comparison between the different studies was often impossible, if necessary parameters are missing. This hinders also the conclusion on real exposure situations.

To fill this gap, ISO/TC 229/JWG 2/PG 10 has developed in a first step the technical specification ISO/TS 12025:2012, which is a general framework for determining airborne release of nano-objects from nanostructured powders by means of aerosol analysis.

The TS provides information on the methodology for nano-object release quantification that covers beside necessary measurands and process parameters also the presentation of measurement results by specific release numbers. It supports also standardization of nano-object release testing of nanocomposites, e.g. by abrasion procedures.

Nanoparticle Release Testing

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 4

ISO/TS 12025:2012, Nanotechnologies — Quantification of nano-object release from powders by generation of aerosols

nano-object number release total number of nano-objects, released from a sample as a consequence of a disturbance nano-object release rate total number of nano-objects, released per second as a consequence of a disturbance mass specific nano-object number release Nano-object number release, divided by the mass of the sample before the disturbance

Symbol Quantity SI Unit

n nano-object number release dimensionless

nt nano-object release rate s-1

cn nano-object aerosol number concentration m-3

nm mass specific nano-object number release kg-1

Vt aerosol volume flow rate m3 s-1

Definition of Nanoparticle Release

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

DMAw/ neutralizer

CPC

APS

OPC

SMPS

HEPAfilter

Vortex Shaker

Make-up air

Cyclone

Cyclone

HEPAfilter

Compressed dry air

Flowmeter

Valve

Dilution

HEPAfilter

PumpFlowmeter

Valve

CPC

Compressed dry air

HEPAfilter

Flowmeter

Valve

Exce

ss

2.5 μmcut

15 μmcut

Informative Example Vortex Shaker method

Nanoparticle Release from Powders

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 6

Limits from workplace background: Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Schneider T: Sanding dust from nanoparticlecontaining paints: physical characterisation. J Phys: Conf Ser 2009, 151:012048. Kuhlbusch et al.: Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review, Göhler, Stintz: 4. Nanoparticle release studies under laboratory conditions Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2011, 8:22

Workplace Measurement

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 7

Nanocomposites testing under lab conditions

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Nr. 8

1. Test Setup TUD

Abrasion test under particle free atmosphere

Taber Abraser for stressing samples

Detection of aerosol particle emission with SMPS

Additional, microscopic investigations

CEFIC Workshop June 2008 in Brussels:

J. Aerosol Science, 2009, Vol 40, No 3, pp 209-217.

Vorbau M, Hillemann L and Stintz M, TU Dresden: Method for the characterization of the abrasion induced nanoparticle release into air from surface coatings

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Nanosafe November 2008 in Grenoble: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 170 (2009) 012014 Arnaud Guiot, Luana Golanski and François Tardif CEA-Liten: Measurement of nanoparticle removal by abrasion

Nr. 9

1. Test Setup CEA

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

nanoparticle release characterization for exposure assessment no harmonized methodology data comparability is very limited complex metrological challenge

objective risk assessment by systematic exposure characterization in laboratory qualitative & quantitative particle release characterization (Göhler et. al. 2010) 2 projects based on sanding of artificially aged/weathered nano-composites

Göhler, Stintz et al. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 429 (2013) 012045.

sample supply

sample treatment

aerosol sampling

aerosol sampling

background aerosol

phys. & chem. prop. type of quantity

instruments

measurands type of quantity

transferability

comparability

sample preparation

aerosolgeneration

aerosol conditioning

aerosol analysis

dataevaluation

sample conditioning

characterization

sample selection

General Release Test Cycle, e.g. Sanding

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 10

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

sample chamber

blower blower

humidifier

heater

filter

ventilation circuit

xenon-arc lamp cooling

controller

UVA-Lamps

detectors

Materials - Sample preparation & conditioning Project A

sample production / preparation coatings: squeegee application oak, alumina, fiber cement substrates

sample conditioning artificial aging (EN 927-3:2006, dry) UV-A radiation (351 nm) without irrigation duration: 2000 h (PUA, UVA, ACA)

Project B

sample production / preparation squeegee application on alumina (coatings) injection molding (composites)

sample conditioning artificial weathering (ISO 11341:2004) filtered xenon arc radiation (300-400 nm) 102 min illumination & 18 min irrigation duration: 2500 h (ACB) / 2000 h (PPB)

Xen

otes

t Bet

a LM

Q-U

V

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 11

Nanoparticle Release Test - Sanding

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Materials - Sample characterization Project A

sample surface analyses specular gloss measurement SEM-analyses

sample surface condition darkening of non-doped PUA, UVA

brightening of ZnO-doped coatings delamination of PUA (alumina)

Project B

sample surface analyses specular gloss measurement SEM-analyses

sample surface condition PPB showed crack formation with isolated matrix

fragments and deeper penetration (50 µm-250 µm) as ACB

PU*-Fe2O3

PU-Fe2O3

PU*-ZnO

PU-ZnO

PU*

PU

aged

p

art

no

n a

ged

p

art

non-weathered surface

weathered surface

sample cross section (50 x)

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 12

Nanoparticle Release Test - Sanding

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

sanding process apparatus of Göhler et al. (2010) particle free environment sampling of all emissions sampling at particle source

Experimental details - Experimental apparatus

Göhler et al. (2010) Ann. Occup. Hyg.; 54(6): 615-624.

process parameters 2010: industrial sanding process project A: comparability with 2010 project B – ACB: sanding only within weathered

region of the samples (< 5 µm) project B – PPB: avoidance of thermal particle

generation parameter 2010 A

SC SC ACB PPB

sanding area [cm²] 13.0 10.4 10.4 10.4sample speed [mm/min] 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0sanding time [s] 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0face velocity [m/s] 3.9 4.8 4.9 4.9normal force [N] 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5paper graining [-] P600 P600 P1200 P240rotational velocity [m/s] 1.83 1.83 1.83 0.73cutting velocity ratio [-] 366 366 366 146cutting power [W] 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.5

B

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 13

Nanoparticle Release Test - Sanding

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Results - Data evaluation aerosol measurement data particle number concentration without additional information not suitable as release parameter number-weighted particle size distributions

independent release parameter fractional particle release numbers nA (e.g. x ≤ 100 nm, x< 10 µm, x ≥ 1 µm) relation to stressed area area specific release numbers [104…105 (particles ≤ 100 nm) /cm²]

0.005 0.05 0.5 5 50

0.00E+00

4.00E+02

8.00E+02

1.20E+03

1.60E+03

2.00E+03

0.0E+00

4.0E+02

8.0E+02

1.2E+03

1.6E+03

2.0E+03

0.005 0.05 0.5 5 50

aerodynamic particle diameter [µm]

c n·q

0*=

dc n

/dlo

gx

[cm

-3]

electrical mobility diameter [µm]

EEPSAPS

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 14

Nanoparticle Release Test - Sanding

Göhler, Stintz et al. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 429 (2013) 012045.

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 15

ISO/TC 256 NWIP:2014 Pigments and extenders — Determination of experimentally simulated nano-object release from paints, varnishes and pigmented plastics Scope This standard specifies a method for experimental determination of the release of nanoscale pigments and extenders into the environment following an abrasive stress of paints, varnishes and pigmented plastics. The method is used to evaluate if and how many particles of defined size and distribution under stress (type and height of applied energy) are released from surfaces and emitted into the environment. The samples may be aged, weathered or otherwise conditioned to simulate the whole lifecycle.

Now – ISO/TC 256 Standardization project

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 16

Göhler, Stintz: Granulometric characterization of airborne particulate release during spray application of nanoparticle-doped coatings. J Nanopart Res (2014) 16:2520

Nanoparticle Release Test - Spraying

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 17

Whole setup scheme for spray application, aerosol conditioning and characterization

Nanoparticle Release Test - Spraying

APS3321

ESP

-3 kV / +13 kV0.3 L∙min-1

3 L∙min-1

P

Kr85

3077

flow splitter

0.3 L∙min-1

CPC 23022A

EEPS3090

DDS560

compressed air supply

blower≤ 400 L·min-1

aerosol generation

aerosol conditioning

aerosol characterization

MFMM40211

2.5 bar

VKL10

VKL10

HEPA-filter

Kr85

3077

HEPA-filter

10 L∙min-1

5.0 L∙min-1

2.7 L∙min-1

2.3 L∙min-1

1-5 L∙min-1

spray-channel

spray module (no. 2)

exhaust, atmospherically decoupled

HEPA-filter

2.5 bar

HEPA-filter

P

compressed air supply

HEPA-filter

two-waystopcock

2.5 bar

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

TEM-image of a synthetic and fractal SiO2-aggregat (≈ 500 nm) containing sintered nanoscale primary particles (≈ 18 nm)

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 18

Example: Nanostructured Particles

100 nm

2000 nm

SEM-image of a dried spray droplet (≈ 5µm) made of acrylate topcoat with embedded TiO2 pigment particles (≈ 200 nm) and embedded iron oxide nanoparticles (< 100 nm)

which fulfil the EC recommendation on the definition of nanomaterials.

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 19

Standardizing: Particle measurement + Sample treatment process (+) Scenario (aging, weathering) (+)

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ISO/TC 24/SC 4 „Particle Characterization” “vertically”, measurement methodology oriented

ISO/TC 229 „Nanotechnologies“ “horizontally”, interdisciplinary, application oriented

CEN/TC 352 „Nanotechnologies“

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 20

Standardization/TC Structure

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Standardization in nanoparticle characterization is performed in 15 Working Groups within ISO/TC 24/SC 4. Additionally to imaging methods for morphology inspection of single particles, aerosol measurement devices have some benefits for exposure analysis compared with particle measurement techniques for liquid dispersions (i.e. emulsions, suspensions or combinations of them), for instance the ability of providing absolute count numbers or the independency from specific material properties (e.g. from the index of refraction).

A fundamental aerosol measurement principle that allows the characterization of particles down to a view nanometre is the electrical mobility analysis as described within ISO 15900:2009. One problem from metrological view, which still exists for aerosol measurement technology, is the lack of a concentration reference material. An important step in this direction represents the international standard draft (DIS) ISO/DIS 27891:2013 for the calibration of condensation counters.

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 21

Nanoparticles in Aerosols

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

In the field of liquid dispersion characterization, a fundamental challenge is the characterization of the dispersion stability, i.e. “the absence of change in specified properties over a given timescale”. Therefore, the technical report ISO/TR 13097:2013 was issued by WG 16, which describes two different approaches to determine relative property changes.

Especially in larger cluster research projects, dealing with fate, exposure and hazard of nanomaterials the sample preparation turned out to be the deciding step, e.g. for risk assessment of TiO2.

Zeta potential measurement proved to be a necessary tool for checking dilution and stabilization protocols. Therefore, WG 17 issued methods for zeta potential determination within ISO 13099, which consists currently of two standards and one final draft of an ISO standard (FDIS).

Respecting the preparation preconditions comparable and reproducible particle or agglomerate size measurement by centrifugal sedimentation or hydrodynamic mobility analysis (e.g. by dynamic light scattering - DLS) can be achieved.

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 22

Nanoparticles in Suspensions

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

WG 1 "Representation of analysis data" WG 2 "Sedimentation, Classification" WG 3 "Pore Size distribution, porosity" WG 5 "Electrical sensing zone methods" WG 6 "Laser diffraction methods" WG 7 "Dynamic light scattering" WG 8 "Image Analysis methods" WG 9 "Single Particle light interaction methods" WG 10 "Small angle X-ray scattering" WG 11 "Sample preparation" WG 12 "Electrical mobility and number concentration analysis for aerosol particles" WG 14 "Acoustic methods" WG 15 "Focused scanning beam techniques" WG 16 “Characterisation of particle dispersion in liquids” WG 17 "Methods for zeta potential determination"

(16 P-Members, 12 O-Members, Liaison to ISO TC 229 and CEN TC 352)

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 23

ISO/TC 24/SC 4 Particle Characterization

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Concept of particle number concentration standard (detection efficiency determin.)

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 24

ISO/FDIS 27891:2014 Aerosol particle number concentration — Calibration of condensation particle number counters

optical detector

condensation chamber

WG 12 Aerosol Measurement

Condensation

Particle Counter

Optical Particle Counter

10 nm 100 nm 1000 nm

Aerosol

Electrometer

1 cm-3

100 cm-3

10000 cm-3

1 nm

Part

icle

Con

cent

ratio

n

Particle Size

ISO 15900:2009 Determin. of particle size distribution — Differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol particles

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 25

Nanoparticle Double Layer Interaction

K. Schießl, F. Babick et al. Advanced Powder Technology 23 (2012) 139–147

WG 17 Zeta Potential Measurement

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 26

Nowack et al.: Potential release scenarios for carbon nanotubes used in composites, Environment International 59 (2013) 1–11

CNT Composites - Scenarios

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

From characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle: - Particle size distribution and concentration alone are not sufficient - Sample amount related quantities (e.g. numbers) and also larger particle

size ranges for plausibility balancing are necessary

- Sample treatment processes can be more important than sample material

- Matrix and nanoparticle embedding properties are important - Nanoparticle release from non-nanomaterials like polymer matrices

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 27

Results

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

For characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle: - Methodology is now available and subject of international standardization. - World wide community has test methods adopted and validation and ILC

started. - Estimation of potential release (Precaution) on basis of TEM-images of

prepared nano-object structures is not longer a sound scientific basis. (Apart from granulometric analyses by imaging methods (SEM, TEM), the

metrological determination of characteristic properties allowing the classification of a material as a nanomaterial in accordance with the recommendation of the European Commission is still a complex scientific and technical challenge.)

The measurement of aggregate/agglomerate size distributions under defined conditions (e.g. dispersing procedures, release scenarios) is essential for characterizing particulate systems.

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 28

Conclusions

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 29

Thank you!

Attachments for further information: Nanosafetycluster ILSI NanoRelease Consumer Products NANOfutures

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

Nanomaterials from release to exposure Kai Savolainen (coordinator), Ulrika Backman, Derk Brouwer, Bengt Fadeel, Teresa Fernandes, Thomas Kuhlbusch, Robert Landsiedel, Iseult Lynch, and Lea Pylkkänen: Nanosafety in Europe 2015-2025: Towards Safe and Sustainable Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Innovations. 2013 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, http://www.nanosafetycluster.eu/news/83/66/Nanosafety-in-Europe-2015---2025.html

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 30

NanoSafetyCluster: Study 2013

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

1. Production Possible release during production may occur through leaks into water and air in closed systems or open production processes.

(NANOSH,CarboSafe, nanoGEM) 2. Handling and use Handling and use covers several process-related stages e.g. handling of powders, diffuse emission from production plants, mechanical treatment of nanomaterials 3. Aging Aging encompasses all processes taking place in the environment such as selective degradation, wash-out, increased brittleness of the material

General processes and areas of possible release and exposure:

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 31

NanoSafetyCluster Study 2013

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

4. End of Life (EoL) End of Life activities refer to activities related to i) re-use or recycling; ii) waste treatment, and iii) disposal. In particular, during high energy processes, the release of nano-objects may not be excluded. The required research priorities on exposure, transportation and life cycle include: - Mechanistic understanding of processes determining the release of ENM. - Understanding the transformation and transport of ENM. - Understanding workplace, consumer and environmental exposure.

http://www.nanosafetycluster.eu ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 32

General processes and areas of possible release and exposure:

NanoSafetyCluster Study 2013

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

http://www.ilsi.org/ResearchFoundation/RSIA/Pages/NanoRelease1.aspx

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 33

Actually: Spread into Worldwide Community

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 34

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 35

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 36

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering

ECHA Workshop 2014-10-23 M. Stintz: Characterisation of nanomaterial release during their lifecycle 37

Cross-ETP Coordination Initiative on nanotechnology

COMPONENTS ASSEMBLERS

(Products & Services)

TOOLS

MODELLING & DESIGN

MATERIALS

METROLOGY

END-USERS

(customers, public)

END OF LIFE

Standards for QSARs & modelling

techniques

Standards for exposure assessment and safe

handling

Standards for material

characterisation

Standards for commercial

specifications for trading

Standards for measurement

methods

Standards for safety testing

e.g. of cosmetics

Standards for waste handling

& treatment

Safety & Sustainability Key Node

General Value Chain: Mapping for Standards Courtesy of Rob Aitken, Key Node Leader: Safety and Sustainability

NANOfutures („Value4Nano“): WG Standardization WG-Chairs: Michael Stintz, Daniel Bernard, Gianfranco Coletti

Life Cycle of Nanomaterials – Standards needed

http://www.nanofutures.eu


Recommended