+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Characterisation of Physico-Chemical Properties of …iaast.org/upload/5672A0514001.pdfsuitable for...

Characterisation of Physico-Chemical Properties of …iaast.org/upload/5672A0514001.pdfsuitable for...

Date post: 24-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: letu
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
10
AbstractThe physico-chemical characteristics as well as chemical composition of Arachis hypogaea shell (AHS) ash were evaluated by different techniques such as X-Ray fluorescence, X-Ray diffraction and thermo-gravimetry. The material, which is considered a by-product obtained from Groundnut shelling, was investigated as a potential fertilizer, energy source and as animal feeds. And this will provide a reasonable economic means to this waste in an environmentally friendly manner. To achieve this objective, Arachis hypogaea shell ash was applied to radish crop in a greenhouse pot experiment having 11kg at33:1 ratio in Irish moss peat in each treated pot (T) compared to the control pot (C). Most of the yield and yield component of the radish crop in the treated pot experiment increased compared to the control. KeywordsX-ray Defraction, X-ray Fluorescence, Thermo- gravimetric Analysis. I. INTRODUCTION Groundnut shells (Arachis hypogea L) are an agricultural by-product from an oilseed leguminous crop groundnut. Scientifically Groundnut is known as Arachis hypogaea, its origin was traced to Bolivia at the end of the Andes (Krapovickas, 1968 cited in Singh and Oswalt, 1995) extending to north Argentina (RamanathaRao, 1988 cited in Singh and Oswalt, 1995). The cultivated groundnut belong to the section Arachis and series amphiploidies and family fabaceae (Gegory et al 1973 cited in Singh and Oswalt, 1995).The species A.hypogaea” consist of two subspecies, ssp hypogaea and ssp fistigiata (Singh and Oswalt, 1995). Each of these two subspecies has two botanical varieties which give rise to four cultivated groundnut type according to Krapovickas and Rigoni (1960 cited in Sing and Oswalt, 1995) are as follows: 1. Arachis hypogaea hypogaea hypogaea Linn. 2. Arachis hypogaea hypogaea hirsute kohla. 3. Arachis hypogaea fistigiata fistigiata Waldron. 4. Arachis hypogaea fistigiata vulgaris Harz. Grandawa Musa Muhammed, Mai Idriss Alooma Polytechnic, Geidam, Yobe State, Nigeria. Email id: [email protected] The other different names by which peanut is called includes groundnut, monkey nut, earthnut, gobber, gobber pea, peanut vine, potato bean, wild bean, earth-ball, truffle, Bambara, Chang Sheng Guo (Long-life nuts), pygmy nut and pig nut (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994 cited in Singh and Oswalt, 1995). Groundnut is the second most important leguminous crop the world over after soy beans as it provides food for human and livestock and form valuable dietary protein component in the absence of meat (Redden et al, 2005 cited in Sim, E. W., 2011). Groundnut kernel contains 47-53% oil and 25-36% protein (Pop and Colab., 1986; Prasad et al., 2011). Groundnut is the third most abundantly cultivated oilseed in the world and plays an important role in the economy of these West African countries, including the Gambia, Nigeria Ghana and Senegal (Folagbade and George, 2010, Nwanosike, 2011). In Africa, groundnut is grown mainly in these countries, Nigeria, Gambia, Sudan, Senegal, Chad, Ghana Congo and Niger (Prasad et al, 2010). In 2007, the total harvested area for groundnut in Africa was 9.04 ha with a total production of 8.7 million metric tonnes. The average productivity index for Nigeria was reported to be1720kg/ha, 500kg/ha was reported for Sudan and 700kg/ha was given for Senegal. Up till now Groundnut is the major export product for Senegal and the Gambia, it was the major export commodity for Nigeria before the discovery of petroleum in the Niger delta area (Adeeko and Ajibola, 1990 cited in Olajide and Igbeka, 2002; Nwanosika, 2011). According to food and Agricultural report (2007 cited in Sim 2011), the World groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in-shell total harvested area in 2007 was 23.4 million ha with a total production of 34.9 million metric tonnes (mt). The report has also indicated the increase in the total harvested area for groundnut production in 2007 by 3.7 million ha compared to 1990, this was also accompanied by an increase in groundnut production by 11.7 million mt The world average productivity of groundnut in 2007 was about 1490kg/ha (FAO, 2007 cited in Sim, 2011). Groundnuts are predominately grown in the developing countries (Asia and Africa) which constitute 97% of the global area and 94% of the global production because the crops finds appropriate climate for optimum production in these parts of the world (Prasad, et al 2010). A recent study provides statistical evidence indicating the percentage of annual production of groundnut in Asia and Africa as (56% Characterisation of Physico-Chemical Properties of Arachis Hypogaea L. Shells (Groundnut) as Environmental Remidation Grandawa, Musa Mohammed Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 1
Transcript

Abstract—The physico-chemical characteristics as well as

chemical composition of Arachis hypogaea shell (AHS) ash were

evaluated by different techniques such as X-Ray fluorescence, X-Ray

diffraction and thermo-gravimetry. The material, which is considered

a by-product obtained from Groundnut shelling, was investigated as a

potential fertilizer, energy source and as animal feeds. And this will

provide a reasonable economic means to this waste in an

environmentally friendly manner. To achieve this objective, Arachis

hypogaea shell ash was applied to radish crop in a greenhouse pot

experiment having 11kg at33:1 ratio in Irish moss peat in each

treated pot (T) compared to the control pot (C). Most of the yield and

yield component of the radish crop in the treated pot experiment

increased compared to the control.

Keywords—X-ray Defraction, X-ray Fluorescence, Thermo-

gravimetric Analysis.

I. INTRODUCTION

Groundnut shells (Arachis hypogea L) are an agricultural

by-product from an oilseed leguminous crop groundnut.

Scientifically Groundnut is known as Arachis hypogaea, its

origin was traced to Bolivia at the end of the Andes

(Krapovickas, 1968 cited in Singh and Oswalt, 1995)

extending to north Argentina (RamanathaRao, 1988 cited in

Singh and Oswalt, 1995). The cultivated groundnut belong to

the section Arachis and series amphiploidies and family

fabaceae (Gegory et al 1973 cited in Singh and Oswalt,

1995).The species A.hypogaea” consist of two subspecies, ssp

hypogaea and ssp fistigiata (Singh and Oswalt, 1995). Each of

these two subspecies has two botanical varieties which give

rise to four cultivated groundnut type according to

Krapovickas and Rigoni (1960 cited in Sing and Oswalt,

1995) are as follows:

1. Arachis hypogaea hypogaea hypogaea Linn.

2. Arachis hypogaea hypogaea hirsute kohla.

3. Arachis hypogaea fistigiata fistigiata Waldron.

4. Arachis hypogaea fistigiata vulgaris Harz.

Grandawa Musa Muhammed, Mai Idriss Alooma Polytechnic, Geidam,

Yobe State, Nigeria. Email id: [email protected]

The other different names by which peanut is called

includes groundnut, monkey nut, earthnut, gobber, gobber

pea, peanut vine, potato bean, wild bean, earth-ball, truffle,

Bambara, Chang Sheng Guo (Long-life nuts), pygmy nut and

pig nut (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994 cited in Singh and

Oswalt, 1995).

Groundnut is the second most important leguminous crop

the world over after soy beans as it provides food for human

and livestock and form valuable dietary protein component in

the absence of meat (Redden et al, 2005 cited in Sim, E. W.,

2011). Groundnut kernel contains 47-53% oil and 25-36%

protein (Pop and Colab., 1986; Prasad et al., 2011).

Groundnut is the third most abundantly cultivated oilseed in

the world and plays an important role in the economy of these

West African countries, including the Gambia, Nigeria Ghana

and Senegal (Folagbade and George, 2010, Nwanosike,

2011). In Africa, groundnut is grown mainly in these

countries, Nigeria, Gambia, Sudan, Senegal, Chad, Ghana

Congo and Niger (Prasad et al, 2010). In 2007, the total

harvested area for groundnut in Africa was 9.04 ha with a

total production of 8.7 million metric tonnes. The average

productivity index for Nigeria was reported to be1720kg/ha,

500kg/ha was reported for Sudan and 700kg/ha was given for

Senegal. Up till now Groundnut is the major export product

for Senegal and the Gambia, it was the major export

commodity for Nigeria before the discovery of petroleum in

the Niger delta area (Adeeko and Ajibola, 1990 cited in

Olajide and Igbeka, 2002; Nwanosika, 2011).

According to food and Agricultural report (2007 cited in

Sim 2011), the World groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in-shell

total harvested area in 2007 was 23.4 million ha with a total

production of 34.9 million metric tonnes (mt). The report has

also indicated the increase in the total harvested area for

groundnut production in 2007 by 3.7 million ha compared to

1990, this was also accompanied by an increase in groundnut

production by 11.7 million mt The world average productivity

of groundnut in 2007 was about 1490kg/ha (FAO, 2007 cited

in Sim, 2011). Groundnuts are predominately grown in the

developing countries (Asia and Africa) which constitute 97%

of the global area and 94% of the global production because

the crops finds appropriate climate for optimum production in

these parts of the world (Prasad, et al 2010). A recent study

provides statistical evidence indicating the percentage of

annual production of groundnut in Asia and Africa as (56%

Characterisation of Physico-Chemical

Properties of Arachis Hypogaea L. Shells

(Groundnut) as Environmental Remidation Grandawa, Musa Mohammed

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 1

and 40% of the global area and 68% and 25% of the global

production, respectively. In 2007, Asia has been reported to

have the largest area of groundnut cultivation by contributing

67% of the total world production (Prasad et al 2010). The

total world production of peanut increased from 31.48 to

33.73 million metric tonnes of which groundnuts (Arachis

hypogaea) increased by 7.13% in the year 2010 (Georgalos,

2010 in Sim, E. W., 2011). Global peanut production has

increased to 35.88 million metric tonnes in 2011 (USDA,

2012, in Chang et al, 2012) which led to concern on

agricultural waste management problem as this high

production of peanut is accompanied by the generation of

significant quantity of waste in countries such as China, which

generates over 800 million tonnes of agricultural waste

annually (Yue, et al, 2009 in Sim, E. W., 2011).

Groundnut is an important subsistence food crops

throughout the tropics. In our contemporary societies it is

mainly grown for the kernel and edible oil and the meal

derived from them such as groundnut cake (Nwanosika, 2011)

a very popular a popular in my African village perspective and

the vegetative residue. Groundnut kernels, apart from oil and

protein; they also contain about 10-15% carbohydrate and are

rich in P; they are also a good source of vitamins B and E

(Hashim et al 1999 in Chun, j., 2002; Nautiyal, 2002).

Groundnuts are used in various forms, the oil which is the

cheapest of all types of vegetable oils and most extensively

used oil in many countries as cooking oil, manufacture of

margarine , preparation of salad (Weimer and Altes, 1998 in

Olajide and Igbeka, 2002).The is used widely all over Africa

as soup thickener (Atasie et al, 2009). The cake is used for

animal feedstock and as a fertilizer. The shells are the dry

pericarp of the mature pods contains chemical composition

cellulose, carbohydrate, protein, minerals and lipids (Reddy,

1988 in Nautiyal, 2002). The shells have been utilized in a

variety of application, such as source of activated carbon

(Shukia and Pai, 2005; Wilson et al, 2006; Ramteke and Wate,

2007). Groundnut shells are used as fuel when pelletized and

made as smokeless briquette (Blesa et al, 2001cited in

littlefiel, 2010; Harrel et al, 2010) as a soil conditioner, filler

in fertilizer and feeds, or is processed as substitutes for cork

and hardboard, or composting with the aid of lignin

composting bacteria (Esaki et al, 1986 in Nautiyal, 2002). The

foliage of groundnut crop is also serving as silage and forage

in livestock production especially during the rainy season

(Beuchat et al, 1992 in Nautiyal, 2002).Alabadan et al,

2006,in Falagbade and George, 2010) categorized Arachis

hypogaea shell ash with about 8.66% calcium oxide (CaO),

1.93% Iron oxide (Fe2o3), 6.12% magnesium oxide(MgO),

15.92 silicon oxide (SiO2) and 6.73% Aluminium

Oxide(Al2O3) under pozzolana. This composition makes it

suitable for application in concrete as a partial replacement for

cement with a measure of success achieved (Alabadan, 2005,

in Falagbade and George, 2010)

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United

Nations reported fear of the creation of significant waste

disposal problems around areas where agricultural waste, such

as groundnuts shells, are grown and/ or where they are

processed (FAO, 2005).The common methods of handling the

disposal of oilseed harvest residue such as groundnut shell is

mostly either by incineration, incorporation in soil on land

dumping. However, incineration method will emit smoke and

particulate matter, which causes air pollution. Incorporation of

agricultural waste into soil influences physical, biological and

chemical properties of soil (Osterli, 1972; Westendorf, 2000

in Sim, 2011). Therefore, it is necessary to develop improved

methods of managing the huge amount of peanut shells, which

poses a critical problem in waste management systems and

subsequently causes environmental pollution (Westendorf,

2000 in Sim, 2011). Transforming groundnut (Arachis

hypogeal) shells into a valuable raw material, ingredient or

product would be the better method to utilize them (Ebine,

1973; Crikenberger and Carawan, 1996 El-hagger, 2001;

Lesdema, et al, 2004; Kyriazaki and Whitten more, 2006;

Dongmezaetet al., 2009; Maheswari al., 2010 in Sim, 2011).

II. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The aim and objective of this research work is to analyze

Arachis hypogaea (groundnut) shell samples for their physico-

chemical properties, in order to determine its suitability as a

fertilizer as the best alternatives in curbing agricultural waste

problems and reducing waste management costs.

III. LITERATURE REVIEW

A. Review of Plants Nutrients

All plants require inorganic elements or minerals for their

life processes. Studies have indicated low organic matter

content and imbalance in nutrient supply by depletion of

essential micronutrient in an intensively cropped soil

especially in tropical soils due to indiscriminate use of

chemical fertilizer (Ronan, 2007). Arachis hypogeal shell ash

or charcoal can replace synthetic fertilizer as it can supply

macronutrients (C,H2,N2, P,K, Ca, Mg, and S) and

micronutrient(Mn, Cu, Zn, Mo, B, Cl2 and Fe) to the soil to

be used by crop (Ronan,2007).Macro and micro elements are

essential for plant growth (Fitzpatrick, 1974; Ronan, 2007).

Minerals that are needed by plants in a relatively large amount

are referred to as macro-elements, whereas minerals that are

needed by the plant in very small amounts are denoted micro-

elements or trace elements. Trace elements must be in correct

proportions to avoid deficiency and excessive presence.

Deficiency or excess of any one element affects plant growth.

Plants develop symptoms indicating nutrient starvation or

toxicity (Fitzpatrick, 1974; Ronan, 2007).

IV. REVIEW OF MACRO-NUTRIENT ELEMENTS FROM ASH

Although there have been many studies on the macro-

element release from plant residues biomass ashes, the

potential of Arachis hypogaea shell ash as macro-nutrient

fertilizer has not been widely investigated. Novak et al.

(2009) characterised Arachis hypogaea shell ash and

suggested its use as a fertiliser to supply variety of both macro

and micro elements to the soil. Multi-element release by

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 2

Arachis hypogaea shell ash could be an advantage when

utilised as fertilizer. Ronan (2007) described (K, Ca, Mg, P, S,

B, Cl, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Zn, Co, Na and Si) as plant

nutrient. Most trace elements exist in minerals as inclusions

or foreign’ ions as opposed to main structural elements and

are likely to be available in lesser quantities than macro-

nutrients. Each macronutrient element plays the following

specific function in plants: carbon C, hydrogen H2, and

oxygen (O2) are macro elements where C is derived from the

atmosphere, while the source H and O2 source is water

(Fitzpatrick, 1974; Ronan 2007). These elements form major

constituents of plant tissue. Nitrogen (N) is naturally derived

from the atmosphere or dead tissues. N is transformed for

plant utilization through nitrogen transformation, which

includes ammonification, nitrification, and nitrogen fixation.

Most plants absorb N in the form of ammonium or nitrate, the

fertilizer source of N are ammonium, nitrates compounds or

urea (Fitzpatrick, 1974). N deficiency in plants can lead to

loss of colour and stunted growth (Fitzpatrick, 1974) Calcium,

(Ca) a macronutrient, is necessary for the growth of meritem

in plants. Meristem is a region of active cell division in plants.

Ca deficiency results in malformation of the shoot tips, (i.e.

the growing parts in plants) and excessive Ca presence can

limit the availability of other nutrients. A major fertilizer

source of ca is gypsum (Fitzpatrick, 1974). Phosphorus (P) is

also a macronutrient element which is a constituent of plant

cell has a greater concentration in seeds. Phosphorus

deficiency in plants causes a purplish coloration at the

seedling stage, with yellowing of the plant leaves and stunted

growth. The fertilizer sources of phosphorus (P) included any

compound any compound containing phosphate, such as

bones (Fitzpatrick, 1974) Potassium,(K) is a macronutrient

essential in plant cell metabolic process. Its presence

influences the absorption of other elements by plants and is

also important in plants cell wall thickening by its ability to

translocate carbohydrate. Symptoms of K deficiency in plants

include yellowing of leaf tips and leaf margins. Fertilizer

source of K is potash, such as plant ash, (Fitzpatrick, 1974).

Magnesium (Mg) is a macronutrient which is active in enzyme

systems and form part of the chlorophyll in plants. (Mg) is

absorbed by plants in ionic form i.etheMg+2‘ion.Mg

deficiency causes discolouration and premature defoliation in

plants (Ranon,2007). Fertilizer sources of magnesium include

any magnesium compound, such as Epsom salts (magnesium

sulphate (MgSo4). Sulphur S, is a macronutrient for the plants

and is absorbed by plant in the sulphate (So4) form. S can be a

source of soil acidity. S deficiency causes younger leaves to

turn yellow and stunted growth in plants. The source of

fertilizer is any sulphate compound such as gypsum CaSO4

(Ranon, 2007)

V. REVIEW OF MICRONUTRIENTS

Iron (Fe), is a micronutrient absorbed by the plants in an

ion form through plants foliage and roots systems. Manganese

(Mn) also a micronutrient and plays a similar important

function like iron in enzyme systems and are necessary for the

synthesis of chlorophyll (Wild, 1993). These two elements

have interrelated activity, for instance, Fe can be inactivated

by an excess of Mn. Fe deficiency symptoms, known as Iron-

chlorosis, is only evident in old leaves which is observed as

yellowing, particularly in the intervene area. Mn deficiency is

similar to that of iron deficiency with the chlorisis more

pronounced, marked with the whole of the intervene area

where plant loses its green colour. The source of fertilizer for

iron is chelated iron compounds and the fertilizer source for

Mn is manganese compound i.e. where Fe is associated with

organic compounds (Fitzpatrick, 1974; Ronan, 2007). Boron

(B), is a micronutrient element and is absorbed by the plant in

the form of borate. B is important in Ca utilization and the

development of the various growing part of the plant. It is also

essential in N fixation into nodules of leguminous crops such

as beans. B deficiency leads to various conditions such as

heart rote of beet and internal cork in apples. Deficiency

symptoms include death of terminal buds of plants. The

fertilizer source is borax compounds. Copper (Cu) and Zinc

(Zn) are micronutrient elements. They are absorbed by plants

in ionic as CU+2and Zn+2Cu and Zn are all necessary for the

growth promoting substance in plants, as both form enzyme

systems. Cu deficiency in plant causes leaves to become dark

green. Plants have stunted growth and other symptoms include

rapid wilting and weak stalks. Zn deficiency symptoms vary

from plant to plant. Fertilizer source of Cu are Cu compounds

and Zn compound for zinc. Molybdenum (Mo) is absorbed by

plants in the form of the molybdate ion. It functions in the

reduction of nitrate in the plant to avoid nitrate accumulation.

Nitrate accumulation interferes with protein synthesis in

plants. Mo deficiency causes general yellowing of older

leaves at the bottom of plants and the rest of the plant appears

light green in colour. The fertilizer source of Mo are any

molybdate compounds (Fitzpatrick, 1974).Chlorine is

important as a micronutrient because it regulates the osmotic

pressure and cation balance in plants (Fitzpatrick, 1974)

VI. REVIEW ON ASH FERTILIZATION

Land use is optimized through technologies and

management practices. The contemporary practice in

agriculture is basically chemical based farming that can

contribute considerable to degradation of natural resources,

particularly soils. (Lopez et al 2009). Therefore, various

approaches have been tested on the use of available and

renewable resources of plant nutrients for complementing and

supplementing commercial fertilizers. As a result, efforts were

made to systematically evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of

organic residues, not only refurbishing soil productivity, but

also in promoting the efficiency of chemical fertilizers (Lopez

et al, 2009).

The combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in

crop production has been widely recognised as a way of

increasing yield and improving soil productivity. Agricultural

activities produce billions of tonnes of other materials long

regarded as waste. The main types of agricultural wastes are

crop residues and farm animal wastes. Meaningful

contributions to soil nutrient dynamic pool and beneficial

effects on subsequent crops have been reported when such

crop residues were returned to land and especially if the

residues are of immediate utilizable form. With appropriate

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 3

techniques, agricultural wastes can be recycled to produce an

important source of energy and natural fertilizers for crops.

Recycling agricultural wastes can help a developing country

to reduce its dependence on foreign energy supplies and raise

the standard of living in its rural areas.

Ash has been reported having good fertilisation

characteristics, because it supplies the nutrient element with

the exception of N to plants and can also functions as a liming

agent in soil. Wood and peat ash was to raise soil pH and

thereby enhancing microbial activity and N mineralization.

Artificial fertilizer has a shorter lasting growth of about 15

years and even shorter response periods of 4-5 years of PK

fertilizer compared to ash which has shown longer lasting

effect of 30-40 years (Lopez et al, 2009).

VII. REVIEW ON ASH AS SOIL CONDITIONER

Biomass ash has been recommended to be used directly as a

soil conditioner in different degraded soils, mainly for the

purpose of forestry and floriculture (Gosh, 2004; Lopez et al,

2009; Pandey, and Singh, 2010). However, the

recommendation for a large ash application to agricultural

soils in a region cannot be made, unless extensive trials are

conducted to establish a proper combination of ash with each

type of soil to establish its quality and safety. Additionally,

food-chain transfer studies for all potentially toxic elements

present in ash are needed to evaluate the effect of heavy

metals on human health. In future, attention should be given

on some important aspects related to ash incorporation to soil

including long-term studies on the impact of ash on soil

quality, soil fertility, soil health and continuous monitoring on

the properties of soil and ash.

A good understanding of how soil biota, especially earth

worm, responds to amendment of agricultural soil with ash is

required. Survival rate and function of soil micro-organisms

and soil burrows such as earth worms are documented as

valuable guides of soil health and fertility in agriculture. In

ecological terms, structural features of burrows are known to

have significant influences on hydrology, gas diffusion and

nutrient distribution (Bouma, 1991; Bouche’ and Al-Addan

1997; Bastardy et al., 2002).

Complex branching of burrows in soil were found to be

more efficient in conducting water into soil compared to a

simple burrows. Siddiqui and Singh, 204)) reported more

branching and concentration of burrows near the soil surface

in soil which is polluted with heavy metals, such as Cu, Cd,

Pb, and Zn, than in non- polluted soil. However, the effect on

the burrow characteristics of relatively low concentrations of

heavy metals, such as those applied to soil through the ash

addition has not been reported. Currently, Yunusa et al.

(2009) cited in Siddiqui and Singh, (2004) determined basic

structural features of burrows created by earthworms of native

megascolecid and exotic Aporrectodeatrapezoidesand found

that FA reduced the total volume of the burrow system (Vs)

by ≤ 39% for native species and 29% for the exotic species.

These reductions averaged 33% with addition of ash at 5 Mg

ha-1 and 39% at 25 Mg ha-1. The native earthworms

responded to treatment by burrowing deeper into the soil core

and away from the ash-tainted surface soil. The exotic species

reduced the depth of burrowing and remained close to the

surface. FA addition did not have significant effect on

tortuosity of the burrows for either earthworm species. A.

trapezoids created predominantly vertical burrows, while the

native megascolecid worms produced more horizontally

oriented burrows in addition to vertical ones. These

modifications of earthworm behaviour by FA addition to soil,

along with previous experience with plant growth, suggest

that an ash application rate of 5 Mg ha-1 is close to optimum

for routine agronomic applications. Similarly, Maity et al.

(2009) cited in Siddiqui and Singh,( 2004) revealed that ≤

50% of FA amendment does not apparently harm the

earthworm L. mauritii respect of their survival and growth. A

significant increase in tissue metallothionein level was

recorded in L. mauritii without tissue metal accumulation,

indicating that metallothionein is involved in scavenging free

radicals and reactive oxygen species metabolites. It is

concluded that this biochemical response observed in L.

Mauritii exposed to FA amended soil could be used as a

valuable tool for eco-toxicological field monitoring for other

ash application such groundnut shell ash.

VIII. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Collection and Treatment

The groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) samples were from the

Clint Williams Texoma peanut company, Madill,

Oklahoma73448USA.Company web site address:

http://www.manta.com/c/mmfpj80/clint-williams-co. 5kg of

the in shell groundnut samples were obtained from Starvley

Supermarket, Wolverhampton on 7/6/2012(Plate2.1a). The

kernels were removed out of the shells by hand shelling.

Approximately, 3.4kg of nut and 1.6kg of shells were

obtained. The Arachis hypogaea shells (Plate 2. 1b) were

brought to the Chemistry Laboratory, University of

Wolverhampton on 6 July 2012 for analysis. The AHS

laboratory samples were re-weighed using an electronic

balance.

IX. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF ARACHIS

HYPOGAEA SHELL SAMPLE

The moisture content of the Arachis hypogaea shells sample

was determined by using the Thermogravimetric method.

100g air dry weight of Arachis hypogaea shell sample was

weighed using electronic balance (Model College B52)

andplaced in the oven in an aluminium tray containers of

known weight at 105oC for 24hrs. Once dried, the samples

were transferred from the oven after cooling and re-weighed

to calculate the percentage moisture content The following

equation were applied in order to calculate the percentage

moisture content :

Percentage moisture content= (Wa- Wb/ Wa- Wc) x 100. Wa= Air dry weight of Arachis hypogaea shell (AHS) sample (g) Wb= Oven dry weight of Arachis hypogaea shell (AHS) sample (g)

WC= weight of aluminium foil (g)

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 4

The result is presented in Table I Ignition of the Arachis

hypogaea shell sample in Muffle furnace.

The organic matter content in the Arachis hypogaea shell

sample was burnt off by loss-on-ignition.100g of oven dried

(AHS) samples were used to perform the loss on ignition

technique to obtain the inorganic ash content of the AHS

sample. The dried samples were first burnt in the fume

cupboard to reduce the mass to an ash. The pre-burn ash was

placed in the weighed crucibles and were transferred into the

Muffle furnace (Model, Carbolite, England). The sample was

ignited in the furnace to 5000C for 1hour in order to burn off

all organic matter in the sample to obtain inorganic ash. The

ash sample was removed from the furnace and was placed in a

desiccator for 30mins to prevent re-absorption of moisture.

X. PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING THE POWDERED ARACHIS

HYPOGAEA SHELL (AHS) SAMPLE

A known amount of the oven dried Arachis hypogaea shell

samples were pulverized using a pulverizer

(Model.Pulverisette6, Fritsch). The samples were crushed

with pestle and mortar to reduce the particle size and were fed

into the two metal steel cylinders of the pulveriser.

Pulverization was carried at 5000 revolution per minute for 3

minutes.

XI. ANALYSIS OF WEIGHT LOSS OF ARACHIS HYPOGAEA

SHELL (AHS) SAMPLE AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES BY

THERMO-GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS (TGA)

Analysis was conducted to determine the moisture content

and volatile matter by a Thermo- Gravimetric Analyser

(ModelTGA7 Perkin Elmer). About 5-10 mg of the ignited

AHS sample was approximately weighed to fit the small

Platinum microbalance pan on the TGA equipment. A set

methodology was programmed into the TGA controller to

ensure the results obtained aligned with the objective. The

method was set as followed:

(i) Hold at 1 minute at 400C

(ii) Heat for 400C to 10000C at 400C/min with Nitrogen

flow rate at 20ml/min.

TGA procedure was followed to complete the analysis.

Result of the analysis was displayed in terms of

decomposition regime graph presented as (figure II)

XII. PREPARATION OF ARACHIS HYPOGAEA SHELL (AHS)

SAMPLE PELLET FOR X-RAY FLUORESCENCE (XRF)

ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS

8.5 g of AHS ash sample and 1.5g of wax binder was

weighed using an electronic balance and was mixed. The

mixture was compressed in a cylindrical mold at pressure (12

tonnes cm2) as described by Watson (1996) to form the ash

pellet in (Plate 2.5). Elemental analysis was performed on

Arachis hypogaea shell ash pellets using X-ray fluorescence

spectrometer (Model, XEPOS FROM SOECTRO). Result of

the analysis is presented in Table III.

XIII. PROCEDURE FOR X-RAY DIFFRACTION (RXD) ANALYSIS.

X-ray diffraction analysis of the AHS ash sample was

performed with an automated diffractometer (Model, Phillips

PPW 1729 from pan analytical) equipped with graphite

monochrometer using cu-ka radiation. The ash sample was

pressed into the sample holder, and then carefully placed in a

goniometer and was rotated at a maintained angle. The data

were collected on PC and was analyzed using a computerized

search and match procedure. Result are presented in (Figure

III).

XIV. POT EXPERIMENT

The aim of this experiment is to study the effect of Arachis

hypogaea shell ash sample on yield and yield components of

plants. The experiment was carried out in the green house unit

and the associated laboratory that houses the growth chamber

of the School of Applied Sciences, University of

Wolverhampton. The radish seeds used in this experiment was

provided by Dr. Malcolm Inman and was conducted under the

advice of Dr. Inman from 31 July -23 August 2012.

XV. MATERIAL

Irish moss Peat

10 plastic pots

Radish seed

Arachis hypogaea shell ash

Meter rule and maker

Laboratory record book

XVI. PROCEDURE FOR POT EXPERIMENT

Step1.435g of sieved air dry weight ofIrish moss peat was

mixed with 13g of Arachis hypogaea shell ash sample and

weighed into 5 plastic pot labelled (T) treated. Each pot was

filled with 89.6g mixture of Irish moss peat and Arachis

hypogaea ash sample at the ratio of 33:1.2 Another 5 plastic

pots was labelled control (U) untreated. Each pot was filled

with87g of peat.

Step2. Equal numbers of radish seeds were 23 sown in the

treated and the controlled pots by broadcasting followed by

slightly stirring of the Irish moss peat mixture.

Step3.The pots were covered and placed in the appropriate

area in the greenhouse, arranged randomly. The plants were

watered daily using a watering can.

Step 4.Measurement and observation of the following

parameters were made daily:

(i) Height of each plant in each pot

(ii) Colour of plant

(iii) Leaf number

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 5

XVII. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data obtained were subjected to the analysis of variance

.The means and standard deviation were compared by two

sample t-tests (p<0.05).

XVIII. OBSERVATION OF GERMINATION RATE OF PLANTS

On germination, comparison between the controlled and the

treated plants indicated the same rate of germination on 3

August 2012 day 6(Plate2. 8).

XIX. VISUAL COMPARISON OF GROWTH DIFFERENCE IN

PLANTS AFTER GERMINATION

Growth difference between the treated and the controlled

plant was observed on 6 August 2012. Visual difference in

growth is shown in plate2.9. A daily record of shoot height,

number of leaves and leaf colour of each plant was made.

XX. PLANT TRANSFER TO GROWTH CHAMBER

The plants were transferred from the greenhouse to growth

chambers in the laboratory on the on 10 August 2012 Day

11.The Greenhouse did not provide consistency in

environmental parameters due to seasonal variation in the

month of August. The growth chamber provides precise

control of environmental parameters involved in plant growth

temperature of 220C, humidity was less than 30%,

photoperiod and light intensity of 16 hours light and dark.

XXI. HARVESTING OF PLANT

1. The plants were harvested on 23 August 2012 Day 21

by gently pulling them out of the peat.

2. The potting mix were washed off from the root of each

plant.

3. The root of each plant, both the treated (T) and the

controlled (C) was separated from the shoot with

scissors and each root and shoot weights (both fresh

and oven dried) were weighed separately using an

electronic balance. TABLE I

PERCENTAGE OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF ARACHIS HYPOGAEA SHELLS

Trial Air dry

weight of

sample(g)

Oven dry weight of

sample (g) Difference(g)

1 100 88.30 11.70

2 100 88.20 11.80

3 100 88.30 11.70

Mean=11.73

Fig. 1 Thermo-Gravimetric Curve For Loss-On-Ignition For

Determination Of Percentage Moisture Content, Organic Matter And

Ash Content Of Ahs Sample At Different Temperatures.

TABLE II

THERMAL ANALYSIS AHS SHELL ASH

Sample Weight loss in percentage

1ststage Temperature

range 2nd

stage

Temper

ature

range

3rd

stage

Tempera

ture

range

AHS 30-100 200-500 500-700

TABLE III

CONCENTRATION LEVEL OF ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS NEEDED FOR PLANTS

GROWTH DETERMINED BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF ARACHIS

HYPOGAEA SHELL ASH OF MACRO-NUTRIENT AND MICRO-NUTRIENT

Macro-

nutrient Ca K P S Mg Na Cl

Conc. in

mg/kg 5.65 11.0 1.11 2.0 3.11 1.84 0.18

Micro-

nutrient

Mn Cu B Zn Mo Cr Fe

Con.in

mg/kg

0.28 0.02 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.09 1.15

Fig. 2 X-Ray diffraction pattern of Arachis hypogaea shells and ash

TABLE IV

RESULT OF PLANT PARAMETERS FROM GREENHOUSE POT EXPERIMENT (N=5)

Plant parameters Control (C) Treated(T) p-value

Height (cm)

Number of leaves

1.26±0.1282

0.8±0.066

4.26±0.012

2.5±5.01

<0.0001

<0.0001

The values are presented as means ±SD; Treated= plants

which were applied Arachis hypogaea ash; Control(C)=Plants

with no ash applied; p-value<0.005(n=5)

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 6

TABLE V

PLANT PARAMETERS FROM GREENHOUSE POT EXPERIMENT MEASURED AT 7

WEEKS POST TREATMENT

Note: These values are presented as mean± SD; Treated

(T)= Plant applied Arachishypogaea shell ash;

Control(C)=Plants without applied ash.

XXII. DISCUSSION

Thermo-gravimetric Analysis

The observed thermal behaviour (TG curve) of Arachis

hypogaea shell during thermal decomposition is shown (figure

III) shows the effect of different temperatures on the residual

weight percentage of AHS (Elenga et al, 2011cited in Cheng

et al, (2012.)For each heating rate there was initial mass loss

of about 9.7% of total weight recorded between 300C and

1500C due to release of moisture(Chen et al,2012; Hu et al,

2012). Thermal decomposition of AHS was determined to

begin at 1500C and considered essentially finished at 7000C.

Peak thermal degradation for hemicelluloses occur at 200,

292, 309,318, for heating rate of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 400C/min

respectively. Moisture content for the samples were < 12%,

and this fits the theoretical range of moisture content for all

low moisture food (Bradley, 1994; Crickenberger and

Carawan., 1996) recommended the suitability of materials for

swine food stuff to have moisture content within the range

found in Arachis hypogaea shell by this research work. Based

on this finding therefore, Arachis hypogaea shell can be

classified as low moisture agricultural by-product an

indication that it is safe from microbiological spoilage and

possible aflatoxin production by mould. Low moisture content

material has the advantage as it does not require exhaustive

drying processes which reduce cost of manufacturing animal

feedstuff. Thus, moisture content of by-products is an

important factor determining whether it is economical to be

utilized as animal feedstuffs (Weiss, 2011).

The increasing ashing temperature>1000C. leads to main

carbonization reaction begins to dominate, resulting in

declining content of ashes due to the sufficient combustion

leading to degradation of hemicelluloses in the AHS at 100-

3370C(figure 3.2). This agrees with Jankowski (2010) which

reported the degradation temperature of hemicelluloses starts

from 200-260 0C. Cellulose degradation occurs ~ 240-3500C

as Jankowski (2010) reported high cellulose content in peanut

shells, also in the literature, Lindsey and Turner (2019)

reported the presence of lignin in peanut shell. Lignin

degrades at 280-800 0C because it is thermally more stable

than hemicelluloses and cellulose (Kyriazaki and

Whittenmore, 2006; Singh et al., 2011).The ash content at

5000C was higher than those at 7000C because of the presence

of few combustible substances in the incomplete combustion

AHS at 5000C. It is evidence from this analysis that 5000C

was too low to prepare AHS ash. The weight loss observed

from degradation at 500-7000C was due to the inorganic

constituents such as, oxides of potassium and calcium, as

indicated in the XRD analysis. The inorganic constituents also

have importance on the weight loss of Arachis hypogaea shell

ash.

There was a significant weight loss between 200-7000C due

to degradation of organic matter which constitutes a greater

percentage of the biomass. At 7000C, the shell lost 89.58% its

weight because all the organic matter has been volatized at the

temperature beyond 5oo0C.The remain is the ash content of

the AHS sample is completely inorganic, as shown by XRF

analysis (Table III). Very low percentage of ash content

obtained impliedly shows high percentage of organic matter

content of Arachis hypogaea shells.

Any material with such significant percentage of organic

matter and low ash content according to Jenkins et al., (1998)

have higher heating values and therefore AHS can be suitable

for fuel.

X-Ray Flourescence (XRF) Analysis

The level of concentration of essential elements from

Arachis hypogaea shell ash obtained by X-Ray fluorescence

analysis is represented in Table III. The analysis was carried

out in duplicate. The data showed good reproducibility and

the coefficient of variation of each test is very low. The result

show high levels of both Macro and micro elements essential

for plant growth. The level of concentrations of Ca, P, K, Mg,

and S, which are classified as macronutrient according to

Fitzpatrick (1974) agree with the typical concentration

sufficient for plant growth listed by Epsin (1965; Campbell,

2000)

Phosphorus (P) Level in AHS Ash

The concentration level P found in AHS ash is 11mg/kg.

This level is according to Epsin (1965; Campbell, 2000)

sufficient for plants growth. Plant require P for the

development of ATP (energy), sugar, and nucleic acid.

Phosphorus also promotes rapid root development in seeds

planted in cool soils. It ensure vigorous early growth of

seedling, promotes seed formation and reproduction in plants

improves water use efficiency in plant and improves uniform

crop maturity and quality (Fitzpatrick, 1974; Grandson, 1987

in McCauley et al, 2009).

Potassium (K) Level in AHS Ash

The level of concentration of K in the AHS ash was

11mg/kg which is sufficient for plant growth. K is utilized by

plants in the activation of enzymes and co-enzymes and

photosynthesis. K helps to regulate stomata opening in plants

to prevent water loss during drought(ie it controls plant

respiration, protein formation by rapid promotion and efficient

conversion of nitrogen into protein and sugar transport, K

builds disease resistance in plants) ( Fitzpatrick, 1974;Mengel

and Kirkby, 2001 in McCauley et al, 2009).

Magnesium (Mg) Level in AHS Ash

Mg concentration level in AHS ash was 3.11 mg/kg which

is sufficient. Mg is the central molecule in chlorophyll and co-

factors for the production of energy in the form of ATP in

Plant parameters Control(C) Treated (T) p-value

Height of fresh shoot(cm) 1.26±0.012 4.26±0.1282 <0.0001

Height of fresh root(cm) 1.06±o.6 2.5±0.2 < 0.0001

Fresh weight of shoot (g) 6.03±0.024 16.71±6.32 <0.0001

Oven dry weight of shoot (g) 0.63±0.04 1.36±0.090 <0.0001

Oven dry weight of root(g) 0.32±0.008 0.45±0.03 <0.0001

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 7

plants, Mg act as P carrier in plant and it also promotes the

formation of fats and oil (Fitzpatrick, 1974; Jacobson and

Jasper, 1991 in McCauley et al, 2009).

Chlorine (Cl) Level in AHS Ash

Cl concentration was 1.8mg/kg in the ash sample. This level

agree with the level given as sufficient for plant growth. Cl is

required by plants for leaf turgor and photosynthesis

(Fitzpatrick, 1974; Engel et al. 2001 cited in McCauley et al

2001).

Sulphur (S) Level in AHS Ash

S concentration level was 2.0mg/kg which is sufficient

because the level agreement with value for plant growth

sufficiency level given by (Campbell,2002;Epsin, 2005).S is

an essential constituents of certain amino acids and protein in

plants, S help to maintain dark green colour in plants,

promotes the nodule formation on legumes, stimulates seed

production and encourages vigorous plant growth(Fitzpatrick,

1974;McCauley et al, 2009).

Calcium (Ca) Level in AHS Ash

Ca concentration level in the ash sample was 5.66mg/kg

this level is sufficient for plant growth as stated

by(Campbell,2002; Epsin, 2005).Ca is essential for cell wall

formation for strong cells, translocation of sugars, root hair

formation(i.e. feeder roots) Ca neutralized poisons produced

in plants and encourages seed and fruit production.

Micronutrient Element Concentration Level in AHS Ash

Microelements are required in small amounts and must be

present in correct proportions to prevent toxicity in plant. For

many plants, the sufficiency range between deficiency and

toxicity is narrow for micronutrient than macronutrient (Bady

and Weil, 1999 cited in McCauley et al 2009).

Manganese(Mn) Level in AHS Ash

Mn is classified as a micronutrient. Its concentration level is

0.28mg/kg in the ash sample. This level agree with the

sufficiency level 10-200ppm and lower than toxicity level

which is 50-200ppmaccording to Jones (1998), in McCauley

et al, 2009). The functions of Mn in plant are:

Aiding oxidation and respiration processes in plants.

Accelerates seed germination and plant maturity with

high crop yields.

Increase the availability of the macronutrient

elements P, K. and Ca.

Mn functions in photosynthesis, as it aids the

formation of chlorophyll.

Copper (Cu) Level in AHS Ash

Cu concentration level in ash was 0.02mg/kg. It is classified

as a micronutrient and required in small amounts by

plant.(Fitzpatrick,1974). The level is in agreement with

sufficiency and toxicity level stated by Jones (1998). Cu is

essential for intercellular metabolism and acts as an oxidizer

in plant processes.

Zinc (Zn) Level in AHS Ash

Zn concentration level was 0.03mg/kg and was also within

the sufficiency range and below the toxicity range. Zn is need

by plant for growth hormones, seed and grain production and

is essential in protein synthesis rate of maturing of seed and

plant height.

Molybdenum (Mo) Level in AHS Ash

Mo concentration level in ash was 0.002mg/kg. It is

classified as a micronutrient and required in small amount, by

plant. (Fitzpatrick,1974). The level agrees with sufficiency

and toxicity levels stated by Jones (1998). Mo performs the

following functions in plants:

Helps in protein synthesis.

Essential for legume nitrogen fixation.

Helps enzyme systems.

Aids the plant in N metabolism.

Boron (B) Level in AHS Ash

The concentration level is within the required sufficiency

range of 10-200ppm and is <50 ppm,>50ppm is the toxicity

range. B is essential to plants due to the following functions:

Aids in nodule and seed production.

Aids in calcium uptake and sugar production.

Aids the plant in terminal bud production thereby

enhancing growth and development.

Chlorine (Cl) Level in AHS Ash

Cl is classified as a micronutrient. Its concentration level

was 1.8 mg/kg in the ash sample. This level agrees with the

sufficiency level 10-200ppm and is lower than the toxicity

level, which is 50-200ppm according to Jones (1998 cited in

McCauley et al 2009). The functions of Cl in plant are:

It helps the plant in photosynthesis.

It controls water use efficiency in plant.

Aids crop maturity.

Help the plant with disease control.

Helps in sugar transportation.

Iron (Fe) level in AHS ash.

Fe concentration level in ash was 1.15mg/kg. It is classified as

a micronutrient and required in small amounts by

plants.(Fitzpatrick, 1974). The level agree with sufficiency

and toxicity level stated by Jones (1998). Fe is needed by

plants for chlorophyll synthesis (by acting as catalyst in

chlorophyll formation), plant metabolism and oxidation.

The X-Ray Diffraction ( XRD) Analysis Result

The XRD analysis result indicates the qualitative presence

of crystalline minerals in AHS ash (figure 3.4).XRD analysis

was conducted twice to ensure accuracy. XRD diffraction

patterns detected at various peaks in Figure 3.4 indicate many

crystalline phases. The oxide composition of the AHS ash is

as follows:

Cao 10.91%, Si0 K20, Si02 33.36%, Al203 6.73%, Mg0 4.72%,

SO3 6.40% k20+Na20 25.28% and C03 6.40%

Pot Experiment

A pot experiment using radish plants was conducted to

determine the suitability of Arachis hypogaea shell ash as

applied to each treatment at the beginning of the experiment.

After 21 days, the radish plants were harvested. Plants

parameters, including average height, fresh and dry weight of

shoot and roots of the control and the treated plants were

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 8

measured (Table IV and V). Table I shows significant

differences in plant parameters between the control (C) plants

and the treated (T) where the mean height of the control was

2.1cm after 21 days post germination. The treated (T) plants

recorded mean height of 4.2cm. We can speculate that the

significant growth difference between the control and the

treated plant may be attributed to nutrient delivery by the AHS

ash which show a sufficiency levels of macro and micro

nutrient element in (Table II) There was significant difference

between the weight of fresh shoot of control and the treated

(Table V) The weight of shoot from the treated was greater

than that of the control may be due to presence of high levels

of Mg in the treated delivered by the AHS ash as Mg is one of

the key element in chlorophyll structure (Fitzpatrick,1974)

XXIII. CONCLUSIONS

Arachis hypogaea shells are generally considered a waste

product. However, the presented findings show it is rich in

macro and micronutrients and contains high level of Ca, Mg,

K, P, Na, S and the micro-nutrients Mn, Cu, Zn, Mo, B, Cl.

and Fe. Utilization of AHS ash as organic fertilizer can also

save the cost of chemical fertilizer, along with minimising

environmental pollution. The Thermo-gravimetric analysis of

the AHS show low percentage moisture content indicating its

suitability as an animal feedstuff. AHS contain high carbon

content that is why there was significant weight loss during

gravimetric analysis at high temperatures leaving a very low

percentage of ash content which is purely inorganic, as shown

by XRD analysis. This high percentage of organic matter and

very low ash content shows that AHS can be utilised as fuel

for heating.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

My sincere gratitude to my research supervisors professor

Mike Fullen, Professor Craig Williams and Dr. Inman

Malcolm all of the School of applied Science, University of

Wolverhampton UK

REFERENCES

[1] Akinsanmi, O., (1995).Certificate Agricultural science.[online].Oxford

Universitpress.London[Accessed14July2012].Availableat:https://www.g

oogle.co.uk/#hl=en&sclient=psyab&q=akinsanmI+o+certificate+agricult

ural+science

[2] Atasie,V. V. N., Akinhanmi, T. F and Ojiodu, C.C (2009).Proximate

Analysis and Physico-Chemical Properties of Groundnut (Arachis

hypogaea L.) Journal of Nutrition 8

(2):194197[online[.[Accessed17Jul2012].Availableat:http://www.docsdr

ive.com/pdfs/ansinet/pjn/20094-197.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.194.197

[3] Adeniyi SA, Orjiekwe CL, Ehiagbonare JE (2009). Determination of

alkaloids and oxalates in some selected food samples in Nigeria. Afr. J.

Biotechnol.vol.8(1)pp.110-112[online].[Accessed 28 July 2012].

Available at

:<http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/viewFile/59747/48027>

[4] Bile, J.,(2010) Parts of peanut[online].[Accessed 20July 2012].Available

at: <http://www.ehow.com/list_7329750_parts-peanut-plant.html>

[5] Badey R.L., (1994).Moisture content and total solid analysis in

food[online].Newyork[Accessed 26 July

[6] 2012].Availableathttp://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=D9R

wcUKQsHsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Moisture+content+and+total+soli

d+analyz

[7] Campbell, C.R.,(200).Reference Sufficiency range ranges for plant

analysis in the southern hemisphere of the United States. Journal of

southern cooperative series bulletin.VOL.394[online].[Accessed 24 July

2012]. Available at :<http://www.clemson.edu/sera6/scsb394notoc.pdf

[8] Chun J.(2002).Vitamin E content and stability in peanut and peanut

product during processing and storage.[online]. A Ph. D. Thesis,

University of

GeorgiaAthens.[Accessed13August2012].Availableat:<http://athenaeum

.libs.uga.edu/bitstream/handle/10724/6397/chun_jiyeon_200212_phd.pd

f?sequence=1

[9] Chang, Y. P (2012) Anti-Oxidant capacity, nutritional and

phytochemicals content of peanut (Arachis hypogaea shells and roots

[online]. African Journal of Biotechnology. Volume 11(53) pp11547-

11551.[Accessed 20 July 2012].Available at:

<http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB

[10] Chen, D., Li, k., and Zhu, X., (2O12) Determination of effective

moisture diffusivity and activation energy for drying of powdered peanut

shell under isothermal condition. Journal of

bioresources.Vol.7(3)[online].[Accessed 12 August 2012].Available at :

<http://www.ncsu.edu/bioresources/BioRes_07/BioRes_07_3_3670_Ch

en_LZ_Moisture_Diffusivity_Peanut_Shell_Isothermal_2888.pdf>

[11] Demirbas, A., (2005). Effective temperature on pyrolysis products from

four nut shells Journal of applied and analytical pyrolysis.Vol.76(1-

2)285-289[online].[Accessed 30 July 2012].Available at

<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237006000064

[12] Dongmezaet E, Steinborn S, Francis G, Focken U, Becker K (2009).

Investigations on the nutrient and ant nutrient content of typical plants

used as fish feed in small scale aquaculture in the mountainous regions

of Northern Vietnam. Journal Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 149: 162-178

[13] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.04.012

[14] El-hagger,SM., Mounir, G., and Gennaro, L,.(2010). Agricultural waste

as energy source in developing countries. Journal of international centre

for high energy[online].[Accessed 24 July 2012].Available at :

<http://www2.hcmuaf.edu.vn/data/quoctuan/Agricultural%20waste%20a

s%20an%20energy%20source%20in%20developing%20countries(1).pd

f

[15] Epstein,E.,(1972).Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and

perspectives[online]. London.[Accessed 26 July 2012].Available at:

<Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.>.

[16] Fasina,O. O., (2007). Physical properties of peanut hull pellets. Journal

of bioresourcestechnology.Vol.99(2008)[online].[Accessed 12 July

2012]. Available at: <www.sciencedirect.com>

[17] Fitzpatrick, E. A., (1974). An introduction to soil science.Edinburgh:T.&

A. Constable Ltd.

[18] Folagbade,O.andGeorge,M.,(2010).Groundnutshellashstabilizationofbla

ckcottonsoil.EGJ

puplicationvol.15.PP415420[online].[Accessed4July2012].Availableat<:

https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&output

[19] Gosh,B.C., Mitras, B. N., Karmakar, S. and Swain D.K., (2004).Fly ash-

a potential source of soil amendment and component integrated plant

nutrient supply system. Fuel.Vol.84(2005)147-

1451[online].[Accessed23 July 2012]. Available at:

<www.sciencedirect.com>

[20] Harell., Diaz, N., Jayanathan, S,. Savilla, S. and Burwen, J., (2010).

Going Nuts.[online]. Developing peanut shell fuel briquettes for

household use in Malawi.CE290: Design sustainable development

spring 2010 [Accessed 17 July 2012]. Available at:

<http://energy.ibi.gov.HYPERLINK

"http://energy.ibi.gov.http//energy.lbl.gov/staff/gadgil/docs/2010/psb-

rpt-2010.pdf"http://energy.lbl.gov/staff/gadgil/docs/2010/psb-rpt-

2010.pdf

[21] Jenkin,B.M., Baxer L.L., Miles, T.R., (1998). Combustion properties of

biomass. Journal of fuel processing technology[online].54 pp.17-

46[Accessed 23 August2012]. Available

at:http://www.et.byu.edu/~tom/classes/733/ReadingMaterial/Jenkins-

Baxter.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(97)00059-3

[22] Kyriazaki, I. and Whittenmore, C.T,.(2006). Whittenmore science and

practice of pig production.[online].Oxford.Willeys Blackwell.[Accessed

23July 2012].http://www.amazon.com/Whittemores-Science-Practice-

Pig-Production/dp/1405124482

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 9

[23] Krapovickas, A., (1968). The origin, variability and spread of

groundnut(ArachishypogaeaL. ).In the domestication and exploitation of

animals (Uko, P.J.,and Falk, I.S.,).London., U.K., G. Duck Worth.

[24] Lopez, R., Padilla, E., Bachmann, S. and Eichler-Leobermann.Effect of

biomass ashes on plant nutrition in tropical and temperate regions.

Journal of agriculture and rural development in the tropics and sub

tropics vol.110 no.1 PP.51-60[online].[accessed 19 July 2012].Available

at: <https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=enHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/"sclient=psyabHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/"q=+Effect+of+biomass+ashes>

[25] Malik, R., Ramteke, D.S. and Wate, S.R., (2006). Adsorption of

malachite green on groundnut shell waste based powdered activated

carbon. Journal of waste management [online].vol.27 issue 9.PP.1129-

1138[online].[Accessed 18 July 2012]. Available at

:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X06002005

>

[26] Mitras, B.N., Karmakar, S. Swain, D. K. and Gosh, B.C., (2003). Fly–

ash a potential source of soil amendment and component of integrated

nutrient supply system[online].International ash utilization

symposium,center for applied energy research.Kentuky, USA [Accessed

20 August 2012].Available at: <http://www.flyash.info/2003/28mit.pdf>

[27] McCauley, A., Jones, C. and Jacobsen, J., (2009). Plant nutrient

functions and deficiency and toxicity functions.Nutrient management

module 9[online] 9 May 2009 PP.2-14[Accessed 12 August

2012].Available at:

<http://landresources.montana.edu/NM/Modules/Module9.pdf

[28] Nautiyal, P.C., (2002).Groundnut: Post

harvestoperation.Journalofnationalresearchcenterforgroundnut(ICAR)[o

nline].[Accessed31August2012].Availableat:<http://www.fao.org/filead

min/user_upload/inpho/docs/Post_Harvest_Compendium_-

_Groundnut.pdf>

[29] Maheswari, D.K., Vetriselvi, J., Saravananmuthu, R., Dhivaharam, V.,

Dhiva, S., Chandrasekaran, R.et al.(2010).Industrial exploitation of

organisms. New Delhi: I.K. International Pvt. Ltd.

[30] National Research council of USA ( 1989) in Sim, E.W., (2011)

Isolation and determination of anti-nutritional compounds from roots

and shells of peanut (Arachis Hypogae)[online]. Bsc Project, University

Tunku Abdurrahman.[Accessed 17 July 2012].

Availableat:<https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=h

pHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"hl=enHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"sugexp>

[31] Nwanosika,M.R.,(2011). Economic analysis of groundnut enterprises in

Rafi local government area of Niger state, Nigeria. International research

.Journal of applied and basic science[online] Vol.2(4)155-162[Accessed

24 July 2012]. Available at: <http://www.ecici.com>Novak, J.M., lsabel,

I., Xing, B., Gaskin, J. W., Steiner., Das, K.C., Ahmedna, M.,

Rehra,J.,Watts,D.W.,Busscer,W.J.,Schomberg,H.(2009).Characterisation

ofdesignerBiochar produced at different temperatures and their effect on

loamy soil. Annals of environmental science.vol.379(pp195-

206)[online].[Accessed18July2012].Availableat:<http://iris.lib.neu.edu/c

gi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028HYPERLINK

"http://iris.lib.neu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=aes"&

HYPERLINK

"http://iris.lib.neu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=aes"c

ontext=aes>

[32] Olajide, J.O., Igbeka, J.C., (2002). Some physical properties of

groundnut kernels. Journal of food engineering [online] vol.58pp.201-

204[Accessed 23 July 2012]. Available at:

<http://www.sciencedirect.co/science/article//pii/S0260877402003230

[33] Prada, P.V., Kakani, V.G., Upadhyaya,H. D.,(2010).Growth and

production of groundnuts[online].Journal of soil, plant growth and crop

production vol.II[Accessed 12 August 2012]. Available at:

<http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c10/E1-05A-19-00.

[34] RamanathaRoa, V., (1988).Botany. Page 24-64 in groundnut (Reddy, P.

S., ed). New Delhi. Indian council of cultural society.

[35] Ranon, E., (2007). Micro-Element in agriculture. Haifa grp publication.

August 2007.PP.40-48[online].[Accessed 20 August 2012].Available at:

<http://www.haifa-group.com/files/Articles/Micro_nutrients.pdf>

[36] Sim, E.W., (2011) Isolation and determination of anti-nutritional

compounds from roots

andshellsofpeanut(ArachisHypogaea)[online].BscProject,UniversityTun

kuAbdurahman.[Accessed17July2012].Availableat:<https://www.google

.co.uk/search?comlete/search? >

[37] Siddiqui, Z.A., Singh, l., (2004). Effects offly ash and soil micro-

organism on plants growth. Journal of plant disease and

protectionvol.112(2)pp.147-154[online].[Accessed 20 July, 2012].

Available at: <http://www.ulmer.de/Artikel.dll/2005-02-s146-155-

siddiqui-effects_NjIyNDY.PDF>

[38] Shukhla, S.R. and Pai R. S.,(2006).Absorption of Cu(II), Ni(II) and

Zn(II) on dye loaded groundnut shells and sawdust. Journal of

Separation and purification technology 43(1)pp.1-8 [online].[Accessed

20 July 2012].Available at <:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586604002485>

[39] Sud and Mahajan, 2011). Kinetics and equilibrium studies of Cr(VI)

metal ion remediation by Arachis hypogaea shells: A green approach.

Journal of bioresources.Vol.6(3) 3324-3338[online],[Accessed 23 July

2012].Available at

<http://www.ncsu.edu/bioresources/BioRes_06_3.html

[40] USDA (2012) World Agricultural Production. Retrieved from

http://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde/latest.pdf

[41] Weiss, E, A., (1983). In Nautiyal, P.C., (2002).Groundnut: Post harvest

operation. Journal of nationalresearchcenterforgroundnut

(ICAR)[online].[Accessed31August2012].Availableat:<http://www.fao.

org/fileadmin/user_upload/inpho/docs/Post_Harvest_Compendium_-

_Groundnut.pdf>

[42] William., Yang, H., Seo, C. W.,(2006). Selected absorption by selected

carbon made from peanut shells. Journal of Bio resources

technologyVol.97(18)pp.2266-2277[online].[Accessed 24 July

2012].Available at :

<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852405005225

[43] Wysong, R.L. (1992). In Sim, E.W., (2011) Isolation and determination

of anti-nutritional compounds from roots and shells of peanut (Arachis

Hypogaea).[online]. Bsc Project, University

TunkuAbdurahman.[Accessed 17 July 2012]. Available at:

<https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hpHYPERLI

NK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"hl=enHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"sugexp>

[44] Yue, G., Zhang, H, Zhao, C., &Luo, Z. (2009). In Sim, E.W., (2011)

Isolation and determination of anti-nutritional compounds from roots

and shells of peanut (Arachis Hypogaea)[online]. Bsc Project, University

TunkuAbdurahman.[Accessed 17 July 2012]. Available at:

<https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hpHYPERLI

NK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"hl=enHYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"&HYPERLINK

"https://www.google.co.uk/search?comlete/search?client=hp&hl=en&su

gexp"sugexp>

[45] Zhang, M., Ma, D., Kodama, H., Meng, Z., and Zhang,C.,(1999). Effects

of six steroidal saponins isolated from Anemarrhene rhizome on platelet

aggregation and haemolysis in human blood. Journal of clinical chimica

Acta.Vol.289 ISSUE1-2PP79-88[online].[Accessed 4 August 2012].

Available at

:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898199001606

>

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(99)00160-6

Int'l Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES’14) May 12-13, 2014 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17758/IAAST.A0514001 10


Recommended