Date post: | 27-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jesse-cruz |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Characteristics of Congenital Hearing Loss
Barbara S. Herrmann, Ph.D. CCC-AAudiology Department
Massachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryHarvard Medical School
Examine outcomes of UNHS
For one metropolitan nursery:
What types/degrees of hearing loss are being identified in newborns referred by UNHS
What happens to those hearing losses over the first few months/years
My UNHS Background:
Data presented: From UNHS program at Massachusetts
General Hospital Initiated NICU screening in 1981, UNHS
in 1997 Follow-up evaluation at Massachusetts
Eye and Ear Infirmary Audiology Department scheduled within 1 to 3 weeks of hospital discharge
If hearing loss, usually next evaluation at 4 months of age
UNHS Flow in Massachusetts
Hearing ScreenAudiologist Supervise
EBC
Notify ParentPediatrician
Notify ParentPediatrician
Make F/UAppt
Pass
Refer
Discharge
DPHPass
ReferDPH Parent
Liason
Keep F/UAppt
Phone Call to Parent
Critical Elements for Critical Elements for SuccessSuccess
Hearing ScreenAudiologist Supervise
EBC
Notify ParentPediatrician
Notify ParentPediatrician
Make F/UAppt
Pass
Refer
Discharge
DPHPass
ReferDPH Parent
Liason
Keep F/UAppt
Phone Call to Parent
1
3
2
4
5
Screening Protocol at MGH
ALGO Infant Hearing Screeners (ALGO I to ALGO 3i)
Audiologists or Technicians 35 dB HL shaped-click at 37/sec over 25
msec analysis time. Custom ear couplers. Electrode montage; Vertex (+), Nape (-),
Forehead (ground). Single Screen
All MGH Nursery: 2000 to 2005N=21,613 babies
Bilateral Pass97.9%
UnilateralRefer1.5%
Bilateral Refer0.6%
Bilateral Pass
Unilateral Refer
Bilateral Refer
Bilateral Pass98.1%
UnilateralRefer1.5%
Bilateral Refer0.4%
Bilateral Pass95.2%
Bilateral Refer3.1% Unilateral
Refer1.7%
MGH Level 1N=19,252
MGH Level 3N=1,371
MGH Statistics by Nursery Level
Follow-up between 1 and 4 weeks after discharge
Bone-Conduction
Right Ear Threshold
Left Ear Threshold
AER Estimated Audiogram
First follow-up test
Normal Hearing65%
Hearing Loss35%
N=393 of 455 refers(12% transferred or lost to follow-up)
Normal hearing = AER thresholds of 20 dB HL or better
First follow-up by refer type
Bilateral Refers Unilateral Refers
Type of Neonatal Hearing Loss
19%
4%
24%
13%
4%1%
11%
24% Bilateral Sensorineural
Bilateral Mixed
Bilateral Conductive
Bilateral Unknown
Unilateral Sensorineural
Unilateral Mixed
Unilateral Conductive
Unilateral Unknown
Percent of Babies with Hearing Loss ( N=135)
Incidence of Hearing Loss overall - 0.6%Incidence of sensorineural loss – 0.15%
60% bilateral loss; 40% unilateral loss
Degree of Hearing loss: Classified by threshold at 2000 Hz toneburst
Classification rules: Normal: 20 dB HL or better at 2000 and
4000 Hz Borderline: 25 db HL Mild: 30 to 40 dB HL Moderate: 45 dB to 65 dB HL Severe: 75 to 85 dB HL Profound: 90 dB HL or greater
No response at 102 dB HL
Borderline Mild
Moderate Severe Profound
Range of thresholds for each degree
Degree of Hearing Loss: all loss ears
N=215 ears
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
23% 28% 32% 5% 12%
51% of refers have 2000 Hz thresholds between 25 and 40 dB HL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
Sensorineural/Mixed Conductive/Unknown
Degree of Hearing Loss: by type
N=215 ears
3%
21%
20%
3%10%
20%
7% 12% 2%
2%
65% conductive/unknown type35% known sensorineural component
Further details:
Unknown or type not determined
Conductive hearing losses
Sensorineural / mixed hearing loss
Insight into current issues
Unknown/ Type not determined
Degree of loss for Unknown/ Type not determined
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
56% 20% 18%3% 3%
N=66 ears
Primarily symmetric
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Left ear
Right ear
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
Conductive hearing loss
Right masked bone
Conductive hearing lossConductive hearing loss
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
10% 46% 41% 3%
N=71 ears
Again, primarily symmetric
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Left ear
Right ear
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
Sensorineural/Mixed Conductive/Unknown
Conductive and Unknown ears similar, so have grouped them
3%
21%
20%
3%10%
20%
7% 12% 2%
2%
65% of all loss are conductive or unknown origin: 41% of those are mild or better
What have we learned About 60% of ears with conductive or
type not determined hearing loss identified within 1 month of newborn screen have mild or borderline degree of loss.
Most of the babies have similar degrees of loss in each ear
Sensorineural / Mixed Losses
Sensorineural / Mixed Loss Ears
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
8% 20% 36% 9% 28%
N=76 ears
Again, mostly symmetric
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
What have we learned
66% of ears with sensorineural hearing loss identified within 1 month of newborn screen have moderate hearing losses or better.
30% of sensorineural hearing loss identified by UNHS have hearing thresholds better than 40 dB HL
What happens over time…. Infants scheduled for another AER
evaluation three months after initial test After that usually seen at 3 month
intervals using behavioral audiometry Many with borderline hearing do not
keep appointment Have re-evaluation data for 65 of 135
infants
0
5
10
15
20
25
Normal Better No Change Poorer
Conductive/Unknow n Sensorineural/Mixed
Sensorineural / Mixed Losses
N=65 babies
46%
26%
22%
7%9%
82%
9%
Most conductive losses resolve to normal within 3 monthsMost sensorineural loss do not change
Questions that have arisen in UNHS Are we identifying mild losses with ABR?
What about unilateral refers with bilateral loss?
Will any screening technique catch all losses?
Should we follow unilateral refers?
Are we identifying mild losses with ABR?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Borderline Mild Moderate Severe Profound
8% 20% 36% 9% 28%
N=76 ears
Yes
First follow-up at 2 days, now 18 monthshearing stable
First follow-up at 3 days, now 7 years hearing stable
Bilateral ReferBilateral Refer
What about unilateral refers with bilateral loss?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
BilateralCond_Unkn
BilateralSens_M ixed
UnilateralCond_Unkn
UnilateralSens_M ixed
Bilateral Refer Unilateral Refer
3 cases of sensorineural/mixed loss on first follow-up in this cohort
Case 1 and Case 2
No response left ear at 85 dB HL
Identified at 3 weeks, now 3 years oldHearing stable
Identified at 6 weeks, now 12 monthsHearing stable
Case 3
First AER Follow-up AER
Which was correct – the screen or first follow-up bone?
Will any screening technique catch all losses?
ABR bilateral refers; present OAEs
First follow-up by refer type
Bilateral Refers Unilateral Refers
Should we follow unilateral refers?
Yes
Unilateral ReferAge 6 months
First BehavioralAge 1 year
YES
Age 2.6 years Age 3.5 years
Things to keep in mind….
Fluctuating conductive always an issue in follow-up studies
3 weeks of age 5 months of age
Fluctuating conductive always an issue in follow-up studies
5 months of age 8 months of age
Fluctuating conductive always an issue in follow-up studies
Lots of confusion over earphones…..
ALGO ear coupler has the least variation from baby to baby than any earphone
Voss andHerrmann2005
What we have learned: 66% of bilateral refers have hearing loss at about one month
80% of unilateral refers have normal hearing at about 1 month.
About 60 to 65% of ears with hearing loss are conductive.
About 60% of ears with conductive or type not determined hearing loss identified within 1 month of newborn screen have mild or borderline degree of loss.
66% of ears with sensorineural hearing loss identified within 1 month of newborn screen have moderate hearing losses or better.
30% of sensorineural hearing loss identified by UNHS are borderline of mild (hearing thresholds better than 40 dB HL)
Most of the babies have similar degrees of loss in each ear
What else...
Almost half of the conductive hearing losses are normal by 3 months of age.
Most sensorineural hearing losses do not change over first few years.
We are identifying mild losses with ABR.
Unilateral refers with bilateral loss tend to be borderline cases
No current screening technique catch all losses; one must chose which to miss.
We should follow unilateral refers