1Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
Charge Collection in p-type Si Tracking Detectors
M.K. Petterson, R.F. Hurley, K. Arya, C. Betancourt, B. Colby, M. Gerling, C. Meyer, J. Pixley, T. Rice, H. F.-W. Sadrozinski
SCIPP, UC Santa Cruz ,1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95060
1) LHC Upgrade environment2) C-V and CCE after Proton/Pion Irradiation 3) Annealing after neutron irradiation4) Bias Dependence of collected charge5) Efficiency
2Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPFluence in Proposed sATLAS Tracker
sATLAS Fluences for 3000fb-1
1.E+12
1.E+13
1.E+14
1.E+15
1.E+16
1.E+17
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Radius R [cm]
Flu
en
ce
ne
q/c
m2
All: RTF Formulan (5cm poly)pionproton
ATLAS Radiation Taskforce http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/RADIATION/RadiationTF_document.html
5 - 10 x LHC Fluence
Mix of n, p, depending on radius R
Pixels
Radial Distributionof Sensors determined by Occupancy < 2%
ShortStrips
LongStrips
Design fluences for sensors (includes 2x safety factor) :Innermost Pixel Layer: 1*1016 neq/cm2 Outert Pixel Layers: 3*1015 neq/cm2 Short strips: 1*1015 neq/cm2 Long strips: 4*1014 neq/cm2
Strips damage largely due to neutrons
Pixels Damage due to neutrons+pions:need high fluence proton irradiations
3Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPRD50 Test Sensors
RD50 Common Micron (6”)
4” : Micron CNM IRST
ATLAS Upgrade HPK (6”)
4Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
RD50 MICRON 6” project
MCz (n-p) MCz(n-n), (p-n) Fz (n-p) Fz (n-n), (p-n)
V(FD) [V] 520 220 75 95
Resitivity 1.9 kcm 1.4 kcm 13 kcm 3.3 kcm
Orientation <100> <100> <100> <100>
Neutron and Proton and Pion (Aug. ’07 ) irradiation of SSD and Diodes
•36 processed , 20 received•Fz (Topsil) and MCz (Okmetic) wafers of p&n type material•n-on-n, n-on-p, p-on-n structures (pixels, strips, diodes)
Strips: ATLAS strips geometry 80 m pitch (w/p~1/3)Pads: 5 x 5 mm2 , multiple guard rings
5Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPCharge collection CCE in p-type MCz
after Proton IrradiationMedQ vs. Bias
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Bias Voltage
Med
Q [
fC]
2552-6-9-1 n-on-pMcz 1.3e14
2552-7-13 N-on-P MCz(Micron) Pre-rad
Curious: large loss of charge at small fluence
6Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
Bias Dependence of Efficiency, CCE, Singles Proton Irradiation 1.3e14
eff @ 1fC
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 100 200 300 400 500
MedQ
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 100 200 300 400 500
Saturation:Efficiency before Median pulse heightMedian pulse height = Single rate
Efficiency @ 1 fC
Median Charge
Count Rate @ 1 fC
7Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPC-V and CCE in MCz (Protons 1.3e14)
CV comparison
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Bias Voltage [V]
1/C
[1/
pF
]
C/1
MedQ norm
Agreement between low T– Low f 1/C-V and CCE less perfect than seen before in n-type FZ
SMART p-on-n FZ 187
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 200 400 600 800Voltage [V]
Co
llec
ted
Ch
arg
e [
fC]
1/C 10kHz;+ 22°C1/C 10kHz; -11°C1/C 400Hz; -11°CCharge median value
M.K. Petterson et al., NIMA 583, 189 (2007)
C-V taken at -20oC and 450Hz
1/C overestimates the depletion voltage
8Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
p MCz proton irradiation
0.0E+00
5.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.5E-04
2.0E-04
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Bias Voltage [V]
1/C
^2
[1/p
F^
2]
pre-rad1e 14proton
4e 14proton
Protons & P-type: Compare FZ and MCz
p-type FZ:Monotonic Increase in Full Depletion Voltage:Monotonic Introduction of AcceptorsMaterial becomes more p-typeIntroduction rate not constant? Donor removal?
p FZ: proton irradiation
0.E+00
2.E-04
4.E-04
6.E-04
8.E-04
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Bias Voltage [V]
1/C
^2
[1/p
F^
2]
pre-rad1e 14proton3e 14proton
p-type MCzNon-Monotonic Increase in depletion voltage:Introduction of DonorsMaterial becomes initially more n-type: Type inversion?Large initial donor introduction rate
9Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPPions & P-type: Compare FZ and MCz
Micron: 1e14 Pion Irradiated SSD
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.0007
0.0008
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Bias Voltage [V]
1/C
[1
/pF
]
pre-rad 3-1 2551-2
p FZ 1e14 3-1 2551-2
p MCz pre-rad 2552-6
n-p MCz 1e14 3-4 2552-6
Same as for Protons: MCz and FZ different!CCE should be interesting!
10Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
NEG. SPACE CHARGEAcceptors
POS. SPACE CHARGEDonors
New Wafer Scorecard?• Materials: Neff = Neff0+g*eq
• For p-type: need Neff0 low: high resistivity• For n-type, need Neff0 high: low resistivity
We are analyzing more proton and pion data to verify that donors are produced in p MCzFZ and Mcz data verified for neutron irradiation:Radiation damage in MCz different for protons and neutron irradiation?
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
FZ-p,n DOFZ-p,n MCz - n? MCz - p EpiSi-p,n
gc [
10-2
cm
-1]
24 GeV Protons
reactor neutrons
11Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPAnnealing of p-type FZ and DOFZ sensors (n irradiated)
Annealing of Micron Detectors (neutrons, 500V Bias)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1 10 100 1000 10000
Anneal time (min)
Med Q
@500V
(e-)
N-on-P FZ (Micron) Φ=5e14 neutron 2551-7-9N-on-N MCz (Micron) Φ=1e15 neutron 2553-11-11N-on-P FZ (Micron) Φ=1e15 neutron 2551-7-11N-on-P MCz (Micron) 1e15 neutron 2552-7-11N-on-P MCz (Micron) Φ=5e14 neutron 2552-7-9
12Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPCCE vs. Annealing (n irradiated)
At sLHC fluences for p-type sensors, the entire annealing process is much less pronounced. than for n type FZ.It opens the possibility that sensors need to be cooled only during operations to control the leakage current, but not during beam-off time to prevent anti-annealing
Annealing of Micron Detectors: 800V
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1 10 100 1000 10000
Anneal time (min)
Med
Q @
80
0V
(e-)
N-on-P FZ (Micron) F =5e14 neutron 2551-7-9N-on-N MCz (Micron) F =1e15 neutron 2553-11-11N-on-P FZ (Micron) F =1e15 neutron 2551-7-11N-on-P MCz (Micron) 1e15 neutron 2552-7-11(p-on- n MCz1.7e 15 neutron)SMART 176-7
13Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPCCE in neutron Irradiated SSD
Bias Voltage 800V
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0.0E+00 5.0E+14 1.0E+15 1.5E+15 2.0E+15 2.5E+15 3.0E+15
Fluence [neq/cm2]
Me
dia
n Q
[e-
]n-on-p FZ 2551-7n-on-p FZ 1000 min annn-on-n MCz 2553-11n-on-n MCz 1000min annp-on-n MCz 176-7p-on-n MCz 1000 min annn-on-p Mcz 2552-7n-on-p Mcz 1000min p-on-n Epi SMARTp-on-n MCz SMARTn-on-p Fz SMART
SMART data from A. Messineo (Pisa), Epi(150um) at ~ 300V
14Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPPCharge Collection in Irradiated SSD
Bias Voltage 800V
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0.0E+00 5.0E+14 1.0E+15 1.5E+15 2.0E+15 2.5E+15 3.0E+15
Fluence [neq/cm2]
Me
dia
n
Q [
e-]
n-on-p FZ 2551-7n-on-p FZ 1000 min annn-on-n MCz 2553-11n-on-n MCz 1000min annp-on-n MCz 176-7p-on-n MCz 1000 min annn-on-p Mcz 2552-7n-on-p Mcz 1000min p-on-n Epi SMARTp-on-n MCz SMARTn-on-p Fz SMARTCassecassecasse protons
P-on-n MCz and FZ strip sensors not sufficiently radiation-hard for the sLHCP-on-n Epi (150 m) is better alternative
15Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
Peak and Median Q @ 800V
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1.E+14 1.E+15 1.E+16
Fluence [neq/cm2]
Co
llec
ted
Ch
arg
e Q
[e-
]
SCIPP n-on-p FZ 2551-7 n irr (prel
SCIPP n-on-p FZ n irr 1000 min ann (prel
Casse NIM A n-on-p FZ p irr
SCIPP n-on-n MCz 2553-11 n irr (prel
SCIPP n-on-n MCz n irr 1000min ann (prel
SCIPP p-on-n MCz 176-7 n irr (prel
SCIPP p-on-n MCz n irr 1000 min ann. (prel
.Casse IEEE 07n-on-p FZ n irr
SCIPP: Binary, Median, StripsCasse: Analog, Peak, Strips
N-on-p strip sensors are sufficiently radiation-hard for the sLHC
Charge Collection in Irradiated SSD
p-on-n Mcz
Long StripsS/N > 10
Short StripsS/N > 10 n-on-p FZ
16Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
N-on-p strip sensors are sufficiently radiation-hard for the sLHC ?
Charge Collection in Upgrade Strips ATLAS bias voltage is constraint to < 500V (cables!).
Peak and Median Q @ 500V
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1.E+14 1.E+15 1.E+16
Fluence [neq/cm2]
Co
llec
ted
Ch
arg
e Q
[e-
]SCIPP n-on-p FZ 2551-7 n irr (prel
SCIPP n-on-p FZ n irr annealed (prel
Casse n-on-p FZ n-irr. IEEE07
Ljubljana n-on-p FZ pad 2551-7 n irr (prel
Ljubljana n-on-p Mcz pad 2552-7 n irr(prel
Casse NIM A n-on-p FZ p irr
SCIPP n-on-n MCz 2553-11 n irr (prel
SCIPP n-on-n MCz n irr ann. 80 min (prel
SCIPP n-on-n MCz n irr ann. 1000 min (prel
.Casse IEEE 07n-onp nirrLong StripsS/N = 10
Short StripsS/N = 10
SCIPP: Binary, Median, StripsCasse: Analog, Peak, StripsLjubljana: Analog, Peak, Pads
17Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Median Pulse Height vs. Efficiency(n-on-p FZ, 5e14 n)
D
G
B
E
Bias Voltage [V]
Pre-rad
5e14 n
Efficiency Median Q Fluence
Long strips efficient at 1fC threshold
Efficiency vs. Collected Charge
• For tracking sensors with binary readout, the figure of merit is not the collected charge, but the efficiency.
• 100% efficiency is reached at a signal-to-noise ratio of S/N ≈ 10, S/Thr > 2
• For long strips (5e14 cm-2) with a signal of about 14ke, the usual threshold of 1fC = 6400 e can be used.
18Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Median Pulse Height vs. Efficiency(n-on-p FZ, 1e15 n)
D
J
B
H
Med
ian
Cha
rge
Col
lect
ed [e
-]
Efficien
cy at 1
fC T
hreshold
Bias Voltage [V]
Pre-rad
1e15 n
Efficiency Median Q Fluence
Short strips efficient if threshold can be lowered
Efficiency vs. Collected Charge
• For short strips (1e15 cm-
2) with a signal of about 8ke, the efficiency at 500V is only 70%.
• The threshold needs to be reduced to about 4500 e, i.e. electronics must be designed for a noise of ~700e.
19Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
Much progress with p-type sensors, both in production and understanding
Difference between proton/pion and neutron radiation damage in MCz.P-type: FZ seems to be more predictable than MCz.Good annealing behavior for CCE in p-typeN-on-n has good CCE.
Long strips will work with 1 fC threshold at 500V (ATLAS).Short strips need lowered threshold at 500V (ATLAS).
Conclusions
20Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, Barcelona April 14, 2008
SCIPPSCIPP
Thanks to
RD50 collaborators in Ljubljana, Louvain, CERN, Karlsruhe, PSI, UCSC for carrying out the irradiations.
Collaboration with SMART, Liverpool, Ljubljana.
Acknowledgments