+ All Categories
Home > Documents > cheeseman6e_ch11

cheeseman6e_ch11

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: amreen-khan
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    1/21

    11 - 1 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Chapter 11

    Consideration and Equity

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    2/21

    11 - 2 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Consideration

    Consideration

    something oflegal value given inexchange for a promise.

    Consideration is a necessaryelement for the existence ofa contract.

    Common types of

    consideration are: A tangible payment (money or

    property); or

    Performance of an act (e.g.,

    providing legal services).

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    3/21

    11 - 3 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Consideration (continued)

    Consideration consists oftwo elements:

    1. Something of legal value

    must be given; and2. There must be a bargained-

    for exchange.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    4/21

    11 - 4 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Legal Value

    Something of legal valuemust be given.

    Under the modern law ofcontracts, a contract isconsidered supported bylegal value if:

    1. The promisee suffers a legal

    detriment; or2. The promisorreceives a legal

    benefit.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    5/21

    11 - 5 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Bargained-for Exchange

    To be enforceable, acontract must arise from abargained-for exchange.

    Exchange that parties engage

    in that leads to an enforceablecontract.

    Gift or gratuitous promise an unenforceable promisebecause it lacksconsideration.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    6/21

    11 - 6 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    The Use of Output and RequirementsContracts in Business There are two special types

    of business contracts thatspecifically allow a greaterdegree of uncertainty

    concerning consideration:

    Output Contracts

    Requirements Contracts

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    7/2111 - 7Prentice Hall, 2001 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman 7

    Contemporary BusinessEnvironment

    NominalConsideration

    Best EffortsContracts

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    8/2111 - 8 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Contracts Lacking Consideration

    IllegalConsideration Illusory

    Promise

    MoralObligation

    PreexistingDuty

    PastConsideration

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    9/2111 - 9 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Illegal Consideration

    Illegal consideration apromise to refrain from doingan illegal act.

    Such a promise will notsupport a contract.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    10/2111 - 10 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Illusory Promise

    Illusory promise

    a contractinto which both parties enter,but one or both of the partiescan choose not to perform

    their contractual obligations.

    Thus, the contract lacksconsideration.

    Such promises areunenforceable.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    11/2111 - 11 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Moral Obligation

    Promises made out of asense of moral obligation orhonor lack consideration.

    Moral consideration is nottreated as legalconsideration.

    Such promises are

    unenforceable in most states.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    12/2111 - 12 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Preexisting Duty

    Preexisting duty

    a promiselacks consideration if aperson promises to performan act or do something he or

    she is already under anobligation to do.

    The promise is unenforceable

    because no newconsideration has beengiven.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    13/2111 - 13 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Preexisting Duty (continued)

    The preexisting duty rulearises when one of theparties to an existingcontract seeks to change

    the terms of the contractduring the course of itsperformance.

    Such midstream changes areunenforceable.

    The parties have apreexisting duty to perform

    according to the original

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    14/2111 - 14 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Preexisting Duty (continued)

    Sometimes a party to acontract runs into substantialunforeseen difficulties whileperforming his or her

    contractual duties.

    The contract can bemodified and enforced

    without new considerationbeing given.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    15/2111 - 15 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Past Consideration

    Problems of pastconsideration often arisewhen a party to a contractpromises to pay additional

    compensation for work donein the past.

    Past consideration (e.g., prior

    acts) will not support a newcontract.

    New consideration must begiven.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    16/2111 - 16

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Concept Summary: Promises LackingConsideration

    Type ofConsideration

    Description of Promise

    Illegal

    consideration

    Promise to refrain from doing an illegal act.

    Illusory promise Promise where one or both parties can

    choose not to perform their obligation.

    Moral obligation Promise made out of a sense of moral

    obligation or honor or love or affection.

    Some states enforce these types of

    contracts.

    Preexisting duty Promise based on the preexisting duty of

    the promisee to perform. The promise is

    enforceable if (1) the parties rescind the

    contract and enter into a new contract, or

    (2) there are unforeseen difficulties.

    Past Promise based on the past performance of

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    17/2111 - 17

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Settlement of Claims

    The law promotes thevoluntary settlement ofdisputed claims.

    Settlement:

    Saves judicial resources, and

    Serves the interests of theparties entering into thesettlement

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    18/2111 - 18

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Settlement of Claims (continued)

    Accord

    an agreementwhereby the parties agree toaccept something differentin satisfaction of the original

    contract.

    Satisfaction theperformance of the accord.

    If the accord is not satisfied,the other party can sue toenforce either the accord orthe original contract.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    19/2111 - 19

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Promissory Estoppel

    Promissory estoppel(detrimental reliance)

    A doctrine that prevents the

    withdrawal of a promise by apromisor if it will adversely

    affect a promisee who has

    adjusted his or her position in

    justifiable reliance on thepromise.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    20/2111 - 20

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Promissory Estoppel (continued)

    For the doctrine ofpromissory estoppel to beapplied, the followingelements must be shown:

    1. The promisor made apromise.

    2. The promisor should have

    reasonably expected toinduce the promisee to relyon the promise.

  • 8/3/2019 cheeseman6e_ch11

    21/2111 21

    2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman

    Promissory Estoppel (continued)

    3. The promisee actually reliedon the promise andengaged in an action orforbearance of a right of a

    definite and substantialnature.

    4. Injustice would be caused if

    the promise were notenforced.