+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... ·...

Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... ·...

Date post: 12-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Chemeca 2016 Design and Operation of High Voltage R&D Test Facility for Bushfire Mitigation Technologies Blake Stewart, Process Engineer at HRLTG Abstract ID: 3407027
Transcript
Page 1: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Chemeca 2016 Design and Operation of High Voltage R&D Test Facility for

Bushfire Mitigation Technologies

Blake Stewart, Process Engineer at HRLTG

Abstract ID: 3407027

Page 2: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

The Project:PBSP REFCL Technologies

HRL Technology Group (HRLTG) was contracted by the Victorian Government to

assist with several activities required to complete their Network Assets Project. This

project required power distribution businesses to install new network technologies

that will better control the faults in Victorian networks, which may cause fires.

HRLTG was involved with several critical studies throughout the project including:

• Ground Fault Trials at Frankston South Zone Sub Station in 2014

• Vegetation Fault Trials at Springvale West Zone Sub Station in 2015

• REFCL Field Trials at Kilmore South Zone Sub Station in 2015

Page 3: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

PBSP REFCL TechnologiesAbout the program

• Genesis of program and projects– 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent

recommendations– 2011 Powerline Bushfire Safety Program (PBSP) was established[1]

– PBSP initiated several projects, one being REFCL Technologies Trials

• HRLTG worked in a multi-disciplinary team to perform the following research activities as part of the REFCL trials:– Experimental program to assess the probability of bushfire ignition from

electric arc faults– Field trials to assess the effectiveness of protection equipment to reduce

bushfire ignition risks from:• Wire on ground faults on an actual network• Vegetation faults on an actual network

– Field trials to demonstrate the findings

Page 4: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

PBSP REFCL Technologies

• Rapid Earth Fault Current Limiter– REFCLs can detect phase-to-earth faults. They then cancel

the voltage on the fault within milliseconds of detecting it[2.]

– With modifications could they limit the voltage of the fault to below the point where it can start a fire

– Multi-wire powerlines make up about two thirds of all rural powerlines so an improvement to bushfire safety for these powerlines would be significant[3.]

Page 5: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

REFCL’s in action

• What REFCL’s do[2.]

Detect the fault, ascertain which phase is carrying the fault, compensate residual current (drop voltage close to zero), test if the fault still exists, identify which feeder the fault is on

Page 6: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Frankston Field Trials

• Initiating Ground Fault Ignitions– Specifically designed and built HV test facility

– Located adjacent to UE ZSS in Frankston South

Page 7: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Frankston Field Trials‘Wire on Ground’ Bushfire Ignition Probability Testing

– Impact velocity

– Soil and Grass Conditioning

– Bounce height

Page 8: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Springvale Vegetation TestingVegetation Conduction ‘Branch Touching Wire’ Bushfire Ignition Probability Testing

– Specifically designed and built HV test facility

– Located within UE ZSS in Springvale West

Page 9: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Springvale Vegetation TestingTest rig designed to replicate a tree branch contacting a live conductorIgnition probability impacted by:

• Species

• Moisture content

• Branch diameter

• Wind

Page 10: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

REFCL Technologies

Trials performed on a live network in Kilmore South to demonstrate REFCL performance • Both ground fault and

vegetation conduction

Page 11: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Safety Challenges -HV FacilityPerforming R&D testing using HV equipment on a live network introduced a number of safety and operational challenges

• Safety was the highest priority throughout all stages of the project

• Multiple layers of protection were built into each process

Page 12: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Safety Challenges -HV Facility• Both test spaces relied heavily on pneumatically driven pistons and an

interlocking system• An interlock on the entry door meant that the door could not be opened

until entry was safe• The final layer of protection was the use of earthing sticks, contact and

non-contact voltage testers, PPE and Electrical Access Permit’s• Other safety measures included the design and installation of a suitable

earth grid • All equipment and structures were earthed and connected to the local

earth grid at multiple locations• Radio transmitted surveillance cameras provided a live feed of the test

facility• Software and hardware protection systems were utilised• All supported by stringent procedures

Page 13: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Other Safety ChallengesApart from high voltage hazards there were risks associated with:

– Fires and hot surfaces, smoke, manual handing, hot atmosphere, cold atmosphere, insects, wildlife, automated equipment, trip hazards, low voltage electricity, high pressure, lighting, noise

– These hazards were managed through the production and review of JSEA’s and SOP’s as well as mandatory daily safety meetings

Unblemished safety record was maintained throughout all trials!

Page 14: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

Safety – Lessons Learned• Where possible install interlocks

– Make them visible (especially software/programed interlocks)

– Belt and braces

• Be thorough before design/commissioning– Complete SOP’s, JSEA’s, etc. and review them as the design

evolves

– Use experts

• Procedures and PPE are a last line of defence

Page 15: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

What was Achieved• Effective completion of all objectives

– Thousands of tests

– Over several years

– At multiple locations

• Outcomes allowed the Victorian Government to develop performance standards for REFCL’s with the aim of significantly reducing the risk of bushfire ignitions from powerlines

• The performance standards were included in the Electricity Safety (Bushfire Mitigation) Amendment Regulations 2016[4.]

which were enacted on 1 May 2016

Page 16: Chemeca 2016 - Amazon S3s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wh1.thewebconsole.com/wh/... · 2016-10-20 · – 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission and subsequent recommendations

References1. Victorian State Government (2016), Earth Resources Rapid Earth Fault Current Limiter (REFCL), Department of

Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria, Viewed 20th September 2016 <http://earthresources.vic.gov.au/energy/safety-and-emergencies/powerline-bushfire-safety-program/r-and-d/rapid-earth-fault-current-limiter>

2. Victorian State Government (2016), Earth Resources Powerline Bushfire Safety Program reducing the risk,Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria, Viewed 20th September 2016<http://earthresources.vic.gov.au/energy/safety-and-emergencies/powerline-bushfire-safety-program>

3. Marxsen T. (2014), REFCL Trial: Ignition Tests, Powerline Bushfire Safety Program, Victoria

4. Victorian State Government (2016), Earth Resources, Electrical Safety (Bushfire Mitigation) Further Amendment Regulations 2016, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria, Viewed 20th September 2016 < http://earthresources.vic.gov.au/energy/safety-and-emergencies/powerline-bushfire-safety-program/electricity-safety-bushfire-mitigation-further-amendment-regulations>

AcknowledgementsHRLTG would like to acknowledge the Victorian Government who financed the Network Asset Projectthrough various departments and agencies including the Department of Economic Development, Jobs,Transport and Resources (DEDJTR), Powerline Bushfire Safety Taskforce (PBST) and Powerline BushfireSafety Program (PBSP). We would also like to acknowledge Energy Safe Victoria (ESV) for funding theinitial risk assessment projects prior to the REFCL field trials. We would like to thank Tony Marxsen fromMarxsen Consulting for his leadership and expertise. Finally we would like to thank the various DistributionBusinesses who assisted with the design, commissioning and operation of the HV R&D test facility.


Recommended