Cheshire and Warrington
SUBREGIONAL Transport Strategy
Delivering and Sustaining a £35bn
Economy
.
1
CONTENTS
Foreword 3
Cheshire and Warrington Matters 4
Transformation to a £35bn economy 5
A network focused on maximising economic performance 6
An interconnected sub-region 7
Future investment for rail infrastructure 9
Enhancing existing success 10Enhancing existing success 10
Additional local network investment demands 12
Additional strategic network investment demands 13
Linking jobs and homes to centres of population growth 14
Delivering our strategy and making the case 15
Summary 16
Next steps 17
2
Foreword
With a 30% GVA per head advantage over any other economy in the North of
England, and with a diversified, export-led economy of £20bn, investing in
Cheshire and Warrington Matters.
Transport is key to our current success and, as this strategy demonstrates,
investment in transport will continue to be central to realising our ambition.
We want to capitalise on Cheshire and Warrington’s current strengths as a
place of high-value jobs, as a source of skilled-labour, as an attractive place to
live, with a buoyant housing market, and as a internationally-orientated, high-
technology economy.
We want to complement our neighbouring northern cities, and to promote
UK Plc on the international stage. And the result of our approach will be to
deliver £15bn per annum economic growth.
We need to start today, because for years our transport network has been
developing too slowly and is inferior compared to other economies that are as
successful as Cheshire and Warrington in the South East.
Our priorities reflect the ambition of the Cheshire and Warrington LEP to look
outside our area and connect into the two major cities of Liverpool and
Manchester through the Atlantic Gateway (what Lord Heseltine and Sir Terry
Leahy termed ‘Britain’s Second Engine of Growth’), and a Science Corridor
linking key centres of excellence such as Thornton, Daresbury, Birchwood and
Alderley Park into the science and research community in Manchester. But
which also provides direct benefits to One North by enabling North Wales and
the North Staffordshire conurbation to be directly integrated with the
proposals by virtue of enhanced connectivity and our pivotal location at the
heart of the action.
We need to maximise the potential in our region of HS2 and HS3, to provide
early, quick wins to the whole of our sub-region, and most importantly, to the
rest of the North of England. So connectivity and improvements to these hubs
needs to take shape now, working closely with our strategic partners in Our strategy shows, this vision is achievable, with viable sites, and that
growth to this extent can be realised. Indeed, Cheshire grew faster than any
other northern city or area during 2013-2014.
Delivering a £15bn increase in the economy per annum means delivering a
transport network that can support an additional 100,000 jobs, and requires
an ambitious, integrated and planned approach towards infrastructure
investment.
needs to take shape now, working closely with our strategic partners in
Network Rail, the Highways Agency and neighbouring LEP’s.
And we want to emphasise that this is just the start of the process.
The second stage of work will be to take the degree of change identified here
and turn it into packages of investment to realise our ambition.
Christine Gaskill
Michael E Jones
Philip Cox
3
Cheshire and Warrington
Matters
Cheshire and Warrington outperforms
all other areas in the North in terms of
GVA per head, with:
Ø With close to 1m people.
Ø A £20bn economy - bigger than
Leeds, Sheffield and Newcastle.
Ø With a diversified, hi-tech
manufacturing and economic base,
Cheshire and Warrington has a strong economy,
and currently outperforms all other areas of the
North in terms of Gross Value Added per head.
With close to 1m people, our economic strength
is founded on a diverse manufacturing, research
and internationally-orientated economy. Our
GVA is £20bn (2014), with 430,000 jobs.
So with a GVA per head greater than that of
Manchester, Liverpool or any area of the North,
investment in Cheshire and Warrington Matters.
As the transport strategy makes clear, and as
evidenced from recent growth adjacent to our
key transport arteries, transport connectivity has
been key to Cheshire and Warrington’s current
success.
GVA / head as a percentage of the
national average:
Cheshire and Warrington = 113%
Greater Manchester= 89%
Liverpool= 79%
Sheffield = 71%
manufacturing and economic base,
complementing Manchester and
Liverpool.
A Transport Strategy to A Transport Strategy to
Connect, Enhance and Connect, Enhance and
Invest in Existing SuccessInvest in Existing Success
It is also clear that connectivity equals jobs. So
continued investment in transport is crucial to
growing the economy by a further £15bn per
annum by 2030.
Investment in all aspects of transport is vital to
unlock high-value employment sites, to further
drive growth in export-led and diversified
manufacturing, to maximise productivity gains
and agglomeration, and to ensure ease of access
to jobs – both existing and in the future.
The greatest returns from investment in transport
will be achieved by targeted action in existing
areas of success.
In Cheshire and Warrington.
4
Transformation to a £35bn economy
Unlocks an additional 174,000 Jobs; or,
Unlocks an additional 100,000 Jobs +14%
increase in productivity from transport & skills
per job by 2030, or,
Unlocks an additional 70,000 Jobs +20%
increase in productivity from transport & skills
To move from a £20bn economy to a £35bn
economy in 2030 means delivering a transport
network that can support an additional
174,000 jobs. Or it requires a 14% increase in
productivity (arising from improved transport,
skills and education) combined with 100,000
new jobs.
In terms of the role transport plays in achieving
this growth, transport schemes can either
directly unlock growth, or enhance connectivity
and drive the productivity of existing business
and industry. Or they can do both.
By stimulating business investment and
innovation through economies of scale, thereby
enabling firms to access a larger labour pool,
increase competitiveness on the national and
international state, and reduce business and
trading costs, and while also ensuring local
people with the right skills can access the right
Four key spatial
priorities for growth:
Ø Atlantic Gateway
Ø Science Corridor
Ø High Growth City
Ø Energy Cluster
increase in productivity from transport & skills
per job by 2030people with the right skills can access the right
jobs in the right place.
But even if we’re successful on the skills side,
we still need transport investment to capitalise
on Cheshire and Warrington’s current
advantages: as a place of high-value jobs; as a
source of skilled-labour; as an attractive place
to live with high quality housing; and, as a
vibrant tourist and cultural offer.
As this strategy demonstrates, the £35bn vision
is achievable. Indeed, Cheshire grew faster
than any other Northern City or area during
2013-2014.
But even so, we will be stronger still as part of
an interconnected North. We want to
complement Liverpool and Manchester, and be
highly connected in a Northern Powerhouse. 5
£35bn
As shown opposite, there is already a strong
spine of existing regional and national
connectivity in Cheshire and Warrington that
helps to drives high-value employment, above
average GVA per head and diversified inward
investment in the sub-region.
As the transport analysis in Cheshire and
Warrington’s Strategic Economic Plan makes
clear, our people and businesses benefit from
long established linkages to Manchester and
Liverpool, their city centres, higher education
and innovation assets, as well as strong
economic links to the North Staffordshire
conurbation and Wales.
As a result, our transport network is generally
well connected by road and rail north-south,
and east-west in the northern part of the sub-
region.region.
But elsewhere, in the sub-region east-west
connectivity is poor, by all modes.
And even where good connectivity exists on the
M6, M62,and M56, this spine of connectivity is
congested and fragile in terms of its resilience.
When it fails, not only does connectivity become
impaired, but our sub-regional centres are
paralysed with congestion.
And on the rail side, frequencies and journey
times are poor compared to both other parts
of the UK, and international comparatives.
Much of the rail network is in need of
modernisation, with poor service patterns, line
capacity issues, and poor quality rolling stock. There is already a strong spine of existing regional and national
connectivity that drives high-value employment, above average
GVA and diversified inward investment.
There is already a strong spine of existing regional and national
connectivity that drives high-value employment, above average
GVA and diversified inward investment. 6
A network focused on maximising
economic performance
ü Fast, frequent connectivity between sub-
regional centres for people and freight
ü Travel by car and sustainable modes within 30
minutes between key centres
ü Reliable journey times, with all growth areas
within 1 hour, door-to-door, from all parts of
Cheshire and Warrington, and key economic
centres
EUROPEAN & UK BEST
PRACTICE CHECKLIST:
It’s fair to say that if we were designing a
network from scratch, and to maximise economic
performance of our region, we’d probably do
things differently.
Making the leap to that £35bn economy requires a
number of essential ingredients, and as part of our
work we have reviewed a range of national and
international examples of best practice to develop
a checklist of requirements, shown opposite.
These are based on international comparatives
such as the Randstad in the Netherlands, the
Rhine/Ruhr Region of Germany, One North, and
DfT research. With further evidence on transport
connectivity, accessibility and capacity issues
holding the Cheshire and Warrington economy
back detailed in the evidence base appendices.
These show that being able to support and sustain
a further £15bn of economic output per annum
requires:centres
ü Support existing areas of success through:
ü Dedicated, high-quality inter-urban
corridors to Manchester, Liverpool,
Wales, Birmingham and Yorkshire
ü Direct linkages to London and the UK’s
top city economies
ü Fast, reliable connectivity to key
international gateways
ü Resolve existing pinch points and capacity
issues
requires:
ü Dedicated corridors as part of a functional
transport hierarchy between our major
centres, for passengers, and for freight.
ü High-frequency connectivity to and from our
key sub-regional centres, all less than 30
minutes away.
ü All main national hubs, markets, gateways and
ports under that critical hour “economically
productive” door-to-door travel time, from all
parts of Cheshire and Warrington.
These objectives and principles are clearly
aligned with the strategic direction of One North
and Transport for the North; but they also
enhance and capitalise on the economic
advantages of Cheshire and Warrington to realise
the ambition of the Northern Powerhouse on the
national and international stage.
7
An interconnected sub-region
- Vital For One North, North Wales and the North Staffordshire conurbation
- With an effective transport hierarchy for business
and industry
Manchester
Airport
Liverpool Hub
Manchester
Hub
Leeds
hub
Warrington
To achieve the £35bn economy, we need to
transform our transport networks through
strategic opportunities for Cheshire and
Warrington that complement Liverpool,
Manchester and One North.
We also need to connect North Wales, North
Staffordshire conurbation, Merseyside and
Birmingham. Merseyside, North Wales and
Stoke add a further 1m people to our
economic potential, and a further £17bn of
current GVA.
Our strategy drives inward investment and
agglomeration benefits for Liverpool,
Manchester, North Wales and Stoke, as well as
for Cheshire and Warrington.
As an enhanced Northern Powerhouse, with
Crewe and Warrington, being “real agents of
Wigan
Preston
Scotland
Airport
Crewe NW
HS2 Hub
Sheffield
hub
Warrington
HS3 Hub
North Wales
Crewe and Warrington, being “real agents of
change”, to use Sir David Higgins’ terminology,
through HS2 and HS3 connectivity to One
North.
Our approach spreads benefits earlier and
faster to our city and neighbouring economies
by connecting Crewe effectively with One
North.
And enhances national connectivity and
growth via HS3 at Warrington, while
maximising the potential of Chester as gateway
to Merseyside, Deeside and North Wales.
We will maximise capacity and connectivity
benefits to unlock strategic sites in the Atlantic
Gateway, High Growth City and the Science
Corridor.
Chester
Gateway Hub
Stoke
Birmingham
London
8
Crewe & Warrington: real
agents of changein the sub-region
KEY
Cheshire and
Warrington hubs
Other major hubs
Warrington
HS3 Hub
Liverpool
Hub
Chester
Gateway
HubNorth Wales
Manchester
Hub
Future investment for rail infrastructure- to deliver faster, better connected journeys, with greater
capacity (additional details in rail appendices B & C)
Stoke
Crewe NW
HS2 Hub
KEY
New Service / Line
Upgraded Lines
Electrification
Conversion from Freight
9
Enhancing existing success
ü Resolve existing pinchpoints
Highway examples include:
M6 J16-19, M53 and M56 Smart
Motorways
M62 J8
Warrington Waterfront
A556, M6 J17, A55/A483, A494/A550
ü Unlock growth areas and enhance connectivity
and capacity to/from strategic sites
To achieve the £15bn per annum uplift in our
economy, we will firstly need to resolve
existing pinchpoints and unlock our growth
areas.
Many such schemes are already underway, or
are committed in terms of funding across all
modes. We need to ensure that transport
enhancements continue in the early years of
our strategy.
These project are being delivered locally, but
also by the Highways Agency, Network Rail, and
in collaboration with local authorities in
adjacent LEPs.
We will capitalise on this success to bring
forward investment that will:
ü transform connectivity across, and to and
Congleton Relief Road
Chester Central
A500 Improvements
A54 to Radnor ParkWarrington Waterfront
A556, M6 J17, A55/A483, A494/A550
A6 MARR- A555
Public transport and active
travel examples include:
Northern Hub
NW electrification
Warrington West Station
Birchwood Station access
and improvements
Platform lengthening
CLC improvements
LSTF and active mode
proposals
ü transform connectivity across, and to and
from, the Atlantic Gateway World Trade
Corridor focused on Warrington, Chester,
Ellesmere Port, and Deeside;
ü unlock the opportunity that is High Growth
City focused on Crewe and connected Mid-
Cheshire towns and facilitate delivery of the
HS2 Crewe Hub Station; and
ü improve access to unlock priority high value
job creation, in the Science Corridor namely
at Alderley Park, Booths Park, Hurdsfield,
Jodrell Bank, Daresbury, Thornton, Radbroke
Hall and Waters Wilmslow.
With these schemes representing the first step
to that £35bn economy, in the early years of
our strategy.
10
A54 to Radnor Park
Middlewich Eastern Bypass
Critical maintenance
To achieve our £35bn economy, we need to grow
our current area of transport advantage to
incorporate the SEP growth priorities within our
sub-region. We also need to grow and enhance
our advantage outwards to other adjacent cities
and neighbouring authorities to drive productivity
and agglomeration benefits.
Cheshire and Warrington already has a range of
highway network schemes to support and unlock
growth in their Local Plans. Examples such as
Warrington Waterfront, A34 improvements, M62
J8 in Warrington, A55 and Western Access
improvements around Chester, and potential
Northwich and Winsford improvements are all good
examples of this.
Strategic improvements such as Warrington West
Station, Crewe Station, CLC electrification and other
rail capacity improvements noted earlier are of
equal importance.
Science Corridor
equal importance.
But more is required, because across Atlantic
Gateway, High Growth City and Science Corridor
there are 134,000 jobs to be unlocked by 2030.
The Atlantic Gateway and High Growth City in their
totality have the potential to create two of the
most important growth centres outside the South
East of England. They are, therefore, the LEP’s clear
priorities for major transport infrastructure
investment followed by investment to better
connect the Science Corridor.
However, the majority of these sites are closely
located to our existing spine of congested
transport routes. So whilst viable, the £15bn per
annum of economic benefit associated with these
priorities is being held back by our sub-standard
transport network.
Total Potential for 134,000 Jobs by 2030:
Atlantic Gateway: 49,000
High Growth City 48,000
Science Corridor: 37,00011
Additional local network demand
requiring investment To unlock and meet the SEP growth, we need
a transport network that can allow for up to a
35% increase on current demands for
movements between some of our key
centres.
Spatial modelling shows the greatest increases
are linked to the spatial pattern of job and
housing growth in Middlewich, Winsford and
Crewe, with significant growth in Macclesfield,
Warrington and Ellesmere Port.
It is important to note that this reflects
demand by all modes.
Whilst also being overlaid with our existing
network constraints, and capacity problems.Crewe
Middlewich & Winsford
% G
row
th i
n D
em
an
d f
or
Mo
ve
me
nt
+32%
+31%
With SEP
to 2030
network constraints, and capacity problems.
So growth of 14% growth in Warrington, 15%
in Macclesfield, 35% in Crewe, and 9% in
Chester is likely to be challenging to achieve.
And with 134,000 jobs we need to not just
split the investment between our growth
areas, but have a greater share of funding
nationally.
By comparison, Manchester is forecast to have
an extra 100,000 jobs by 2026.
Macclesfield
Ellesmere Port
Warrington
Chester
% G
row
th i
n D
em
an
d f
or
Mo
ve
me
nt
+31%
+19%
+15%
+14%
+9%
12
£35bn
Strategic Road Network
Typical Cheshire and Warrington Interurban
Corridors
Rail Network
Additional strategic network demand
requiring investment
Cheshire and Warrington’s inter-urban arteries
are important too.
Spatial modelling shows the growth in jobs and
houses associated with the SEP Growth requires
the delivery of a network that can support a 40%
increase in demand on the M6, and M62
corridors. And a 30-35% increase in demand
through corridors such as Congleton, Winsford,
Middlewich, the M53 / M56, and Alderley Edge.
It follows that investment in the full range of
transport planning solutions will need to be
deployed to meet this challenge.
Modelling highlights key pressures on all rail lines,
with the greatest increases found on routes
to/from Warrington, Crewe to Macclesfield and
Congleton, stations on the Mid-Cheshire Line, and
Chester to Manchester, Ellesmere-Port and
Liverpool.
+40%
+30-35%
+60%Rail Network
Freight
Liverpool.
Highways Agency and Network Rail forecasting
predicts an increase of 70% in freight via Liverpool
Superport, and a 25% increase in freight demands
elsewhere in Cheshire and Warrington.
Our strategy needs to ensure that the majority of
this growth in travel demand is by rail, rather
than road. It needs to be linked to the
investment described previously, as part of Rail
North.
Finally, there needs to be early, direct access
to/from HS2, HS3, and Manchester Airport, to
maximise economic gains and provide enhanced
sub-regional links along each of our lines that are
not achieving their full economic potential.
In the long term, increased usage will reduce the
subsidy requirements.
+60%
+70% to Liverpool
+25% in Cheshire and
Warrington
13
£35bn
HS3
Hub
Linking jobs to homes and centres of population
growthOur Strategy needs to be sustainable,
promote integrated land uses and active
travel, and reduce the need to travel in the
first place.
Our strategy seeks to overcome existing gaps
in our rail, public transport, and local
sustainable networks, and support the high-
quality environment demanded by high-value
employers.
In particular, we need to overcome present
gaps in public transport connectivity between
Crewe and Macclesfield, the Mid-Cheshire
Line, Chester and Ellesmere Port to Liverpool
and Manchester, and Macclesfield to Alderley
Edge/ Northwich.
LiverpoolManchester
NW HS2
Hub
We also need to connect jobs to population
growth, and national opportunity from HS2,
HS3, and to/from Manchester airport and our
international gateways is also a priority (as
indicated by the blue arrows).
However, our analysis of housing locations as
part of the SEP shows a similar spatial pattern
to that of jobs, but with significantly lower
growth in the Science Corridor.
So to be sustainable, our transport strategy
also needs to ensure effective access by all
modes to/from the Science Corridor, and to
prevent extended travel distances, especially
by car (as indicated by the red arrows).
Chester
Gateway
Hub
Key:Existing Links (requiring improvement)
Strategic Transport Gaps
Stoke
North
Wales
14Residential growth area
Science corridor
Unlock
Transform
Delivering our strategy & making
the case
As our strategy noted at the outset, we need
to enhance connectivity compared to where
we are today as well as unlocking and
catering for growth.
In so doing, achieving transformational
investment in Cheshire and Warrington, and
to drive One North.
So we need to start campaigning for
investment to deliver the network required for
an achievable £35bn economy.
And we need to start today, not tomorrow.
Our analysis, supported by that of the SEP,
highest GVA values per head in Northern
England and strong economic growth over the
Resolve
England and strong economic growth over the
past few years tangibly demonstrates that
providing the right investment in our
transport systems would deliver
unprecedented change to better connect
people and jobs.
Through this strategy we will develop an
exemplary transport network that delivers
£15bn of growth per annum; engages and
collaborates with our delivery partners, and
neighbours; enhances national and
international competitiveness; fosters inward
investment ,and helps rebalance the national
economy.
Our strategy therefore benefits our own local
communities , those of our neighbours, and
the country as a whole.
15
The following organisations will be engaged and
involved in delivery of this strategy:
Ø Department for Transport
Ø Highways Agency
Ø Transport for the North
Ø HS2, Network Rail & Rail North
Ø Sustrans
Ø Cheshire East, Cheshire West, and Warrington
Ø Welsh Government/ Llywodraeth Cymru
Ø TfGM
Ø MDA, North Staffordshire and neighbouring
authorities£35bn
Summary
ü A £35bn economy is achievable.
ü Major growth is north-south, and east-west on existing
axis, along with Science Corridor
ü There is a need to drive strategic opportunities
ü Gaps in local transport remain
ü Transport investment is best located in successful
Our strategy will ensure the additional
infrastructure, connectivity and capacity
required to unlock the £15bn per annum
increase described in the Strategy Economic
Plan.
Our economy is bigger than Sheffield, Leeds
or Newcastle, and with a 30% GVA per head
advantage over other parts of the North, we
believe investment in Cheshire and
Warrington Matters.
Investing in our existing success will
maximising our contribution to the North.
To One North.
To Transport for the North.ü Transport investment is best located in successful
economies… Like Ours.
To Transport for the North.
And to UK Plc.
Making sure that transport investment is
targeted in the most successful economies.
In economies like ours.
16
£35bn
Stage 1: Written report & sign-off by next LTB MeetingStage 1: Written report & sign-off by next LTB Meeting
Stage 1b: Making the case for this network and
investment
Stage 1b: Making the case for this network and
investment
Stage 2: Developing priority corridors for further
analysis & option appraisal
Stage 2: Developing priority corridors for further
analysis & option appraisal
Next stepsWorking with partners across the North and
the national agencies, the next stage of work is
to ensure that all transport options to meet
this challenge, across all modes, are duly
considered as part of the LEP’s investment
programme.
Investment in key schemes is needed to unlock
growth, and we have prepared a strong
strategic case to help us achieve our ambitions.
Between now and Summer 2015, we will
develop this strategy into a phased investment
programme based on an economically driven
option sifting process that is also sufficiently
robust to be used by partner agencies to
develop holistic, integrated investment
decisions.
analysis & option appraisalanalysis & option appraisal
To find the optimal schemes linked to our growth
objectives
To find the optimal schemes linked to our growth
objectives
To continue with scheme delivery to transform our network to
achieve a £35bn economy.
To continue with scheme delivery to transform our network to
achieve a £35bn economy.
Our process will identify the optimal schemes
linked to Cheshire and Warrington’s objectives,
which are inextricably linked with those same
objectives of One North, North Wales, Stoke
and Staffordshire, and UK Plc.
Our focus will be: making sure transport
investment is targeted on the most successful
areas of our sub-region; unlocking the greatest
economic potential; and driving productivity
and agglomeration economies with our
neighbours.
These are the key points on which higher
productivity per job, and attracting higher-value
inward investment are founded.
17
APPENDICES
Section A - Evidence Base
Section B - Rail
Section C - Rail Freight
Section D - 2011 Census- Trends Analysis & Comparisons Against 2001
18
Cheshire & Warrington SUBREGIONAL
Transport Strategy
A- Evidence Base
.
19
CURRENT CONGESTION HOTSPOTS- Cheshire & Warrington(Google API Data) 20
Atlantic Gateway
Science Corridor
The Larger the Circle the Greater the
Number of Jobs.
Light Blue Indicates SEP Growth; Dark
Blue Local Plan Growth
The Larger the Circle the Greater the
Number of Jobs.
Light Blue Indicates SEP Growth; Dark
Blue Local Plan Growth
Total Potential for
134,000 Jobs:
Atlantic Gateway: 49,000
High Growth City 48,000
Science Corridor: 37,000
Total Potential for
134,000 Jobs:
Atlantic Gateway: 49,000
High Growth City 48,000
Science Corridor: 37,000
Total Potential for
134,000 Jobs to 2030:
Cheshire East: 76,000
Warrington: 38,000
Cheshire West: 20,000
Total Potential for
134,000 Jobs to 2030:
Cheshire East: 76,000
Warrington: 38,000
Cheshire West: 20,000
High Growth
City
21
CURRENT CHESHIRE & WARRINGTON SUBREGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY TO ONE NORTH (Defined as Liverpool, Manchester, Manchester Airport, Sheffield & Leeds, within 60
minutes) 22
CURRENT SUBREGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY TO MANCHESTER
(Within 60 minutes) 23
CURRENT SUBREGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY TO LIVERPOOL
(Within 60 minutes) 24
CURRENT SUBREGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY TO BIRMINGHAM
(Within 60 minutes) 25
GRAVITY MODEL USED TO FORECAST
CHANGES
M6
M62
M56
M53
M53
M6
A537
A556
A51/54/556
A49/533
River Mersey
River Mersey
A6/523
A56 A34
A34
M6A553
23
36
29
27
41
44
37
29
36
42
35
35
40
M58
13
M61
33
M62 24
Manchester
Internal
Wigan/The North
Internal
Warrington
14%Liverpool
Internal
Ellesmere Port
15%
Northwich
13%
Knutsford
7%
Wilmslow
8%
Macclesfield
19%
GRAVITY MODEL USED TO FORECAST DEMAND CHANGES- BACKGROUND LOCAL PLAN + SEP GROWTH26
Link Flow Name
Corridor Label Scenario 2
A Road/Motorway classification
Internal/External Settlement Flow
% Trips Internal to Settlement Mode
2030 Transformational Grow th
AADF
Road
2030 Transformational Growth AADF
Road Trips
B1832052 Transport for Lancashire Growth Strategy:
Forecast Traffic Movements along Corridors Between Hubs
A536
A534
M6
A51/A41A530
A54
A55
A500
A34
M6A553
46
30
40
31
47
24
42
41
35
30
48
36
XX
North Wales
Internal
Chester
9%
Mi ddlewich &
Winsford
32%
Birmingham
Internal
Crewe
31%
Stoke
Internal
Congleton
20%
0
WITHOUT THE SEP BY 2030 (DfT, HA & NR Forecasts)
Car Demand 21%
Delays 33% Motorways (55%)
Speeds -4% Motorways (-5%)
• 70% in freight via Liverpool Superport
• 23% in freight demands through C&W
Rail Demand: Low Scenario 30%
Rail Demand: High Scenario 65%
27
Additional Daily Demand With SEP Outcomes & Background
Growth to 2030
Middlewich & Winsford +32%
Crewe +31%
Macclesfield +19%
THE IMPACTS OF SEP GROWTH: Subregional Centres
Ellesmere Port +15%
Warrington +14%
Chester +9%
28
Additional Daily Demand With SEP Outcomes & Background
Growth to 2030
Macclesfield- Knutsford/M6 +42%
M6 +41%
M62 Warrington- Manchester +41%
Knutsford/ Alderley Edge- Manchester +40%
Crewe-Congleton-Macclesfield +38%
M56 +36%
THE IMPACTS OF SEP GROWTH: Key Corridors
M56 +36%
Chester- Northwich/ Winsford +36%
Crewe- Middlewich/ Winsford +30%
Chester-Crewe +30%
M62 Warrington- Liverpool +24%
29
Cheshire & Warrington SUBREGIONAL
Transport Strategy
B- Rail
.
30
Our ask:Proposed schemes designed to support the growth of rail passenger volumes in Cheshire,
Warrington and surrounding areas fall into the following groups:
• HS2 & HS3;
• North of England Programmes;
• Refranchising of Northern Rail and TransPennine Express; and
• Specific Cheshire and Warrington improvements, lettered A to J
• Other plans and aspirations – as noted in the following pages, numbered 1 to 12
31
A
B
C D
E
F
G
MAP ILLUSTRATING LOCATION OF CURRENTLY PROPOSED RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCEMENTS TO
SUPPORT PASSENGER GROWTH IN CHESHIRE & WARRINGTON
A
B
C
32
D
H
I
J
A - J
HS2 & HS3
Significant features of plans to extend HS2 through to the North West with implications for the LEP area include:
❶ The latest HS2 report advocates a new high speed station to the south of Crewe. Previously plans includedutilising the existing West Coast main line station via a junction at Basford with the HS2 line continuing norththrough a tunnel below the station.
❷ A new interchange station at the northern side of Manchester Airport.
❸ An upgraded station at Manchester Piccadilly linking the existing and HS2 concourses. It is planned to have at least four new HS2 platforms.
33
Delivery of North of England Programmes
Programme of upgrades scheduled for completion in 2019. Overall benefits include the ability to operate an additional 700 trains per day and an extra 44 million passenger journeys annually. The Northern Hub caters for the entire north of England with benefits planned as far East as Newcastle and Hull and Chester and Liverpool in the West.
❹ Ordsall Chord Plans include a new section of railway to the north west of Castlefield Junction. This will link both Castlefieldand Deal Street connecting Manchester’s Victoria, Oxford Road and Piccadilly stations for the first time. To be operational by December 2016.
Benefits:• Two additional fast trains per hour between Manchester Victoria and Liverpool plus a journey time improvement of 10-
15 minutes;15 minutes;• Six fast trains per hour between Leeds and Manchester opposed to the current four per hour;• A new direct Manchester Airport service via the city centre;• Faster journey times to Hull, Newcastle and the North East; and• Trains between Manchester Airport, Leeds, Bradford, Rochdale, Newcastle and other train services across the North
will no longer need to reverse at Manchester Piccadilly. A consequence of the planned changes is the current Liverpool to North East TransPennine Express transferring from Manchester Piccadilly and the CLC route to Manchester Victoria and the Chat Moss route. The consequence of withdrawing the Liverpool/Piccadilly service will be to halve the fast service between Liverpool, Warrington and Manchester Piccadilly therefore effectively losing one fast service per hour to Warrington.
34
North of England Programmes
❺ New platforms and / or station capacity improvements at Liverpool Lime Street, Manchester Piccadilly, Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester Victoria & Manchester Airport.
• Manchester Piccadilly Station capacity increase by providing two new through platforms, (15 and 16), which will improve station capacity and platform acceptance times from four to three minutes. The new platforms will also facilitate four new through services to Oxford Road and one freight path to Trafford Park. Construction is expected to be completed for the December 2018 timetable;
• Manchester Oxford Road: Platform lengthening and reconfiguration of signalling and infrastructure to operate longer eight car trains;
• Manchester Victoria: Extensive station refurbishment and the remodelling of the Metrolink infrastructure from two to three tracks and associated platform capacity. The project is scheduled to be completed in 2015; and
• Manchester Airport: Construction of a fourth new platform which will increase station capacity.
❻ Chat Moss Route Capacity ImprovementThe scheme will provide line capacity improvements between Huyton to Ruby by adding a new line and improving capacity and facilities at Huyton and Ruby stations. The objective of the scheme is to facilitate:•Additional fast trains between Manchester and Liverpool which will be able to overtake local stopping services;•More frequent services between Liverpool and Preston without impacting on existing freight and local services; and•Additional alternative route options during maintenance closures
35
North of England Programmes
❼ Enhancements to Facilitate journey Time Improvements between Wrexham, Chester and Warrington
Route infrastructure improvements to increase line speed will result in shorter journey times. A new Chester to Manchester Airport services and a targeted reduction in journey times to Manchester by up to 23 minutes will also be an output of the overall Northern Hub scheme.
In May 2014 Network Rail closed the route at Chriselton tunnel for several days to resolve an ongoing flooding problem which had been causing reliability problems between Chester and Crewe.
A number of enhancements are also being made to the railway infrastructure between Wrexham and Chester which will increase the lines speed profile. This includes:
• Doubling 5.5 miles of track specifically between Rossett and Saltney Junctions;• Doubling 5.5 miles of track specifically between Rossett and Saltney Junctions;• Various track enhancements to increase line speeds; and• The upgrading of four level crossings to facilitate line speed improvements
Line speed enhancements with the objective of reducing journey times. At Rochdale station a third platform will be added to allow terminating Manchester services keep clear of the main line. This will facilitate trains going beyond Rochdale by reducing line congestion and improving through line capacity for the benefit of Cheshire and Warrington.
36
North West Electrification
❽ Electrification of routes across the north west including:
• Preston to Blackpool by May 2016• Manchester Victoria to Preston by December 2016• Oxenholme to Windermere and Wigan to Lostock dates are to be announced
Trans Pennine Electrification
❾ Electrification of Routes to Stalybridge from Manchester Victoria and Manchester Piccadilly
North of England Programmes
❾ Electrification of Routes to Stalybridge from Manchester Victoria and Manchester Piccadilly
• Manchester and Guide Bridge to Stalybridge by December 2016; and• Full electrification between Manchester, Leeds and York by December 2018 which will link up with the York and Leeds
electrified lines
North West Train Lengthening
❿ Currently in development Network Rail are considering increasing usable platform lengths at a number of stations across the north west, including: stations on the CLC route between Chester and Manchester (Mouldsworth, Delamere, Cuddington, Greenbank & Plumley) and the CLC route between Liverpool and Manchester (Widnes & Warrington Central). The initiative is aligned with the delivery of HLOS metrics relating to projected increases in passenger patronage.
37
Other Plans & Future Aspirations
⓫ Hope Valley Line/Marple Line (forms part of the Northern Hub scheme)
Between Dore and Grindleford two new freight loops are being constructed along with double tracking the current single line at Dore Junction. A new platform, including an overbridge and lifts, at Dore will be commissioned to accommodate the double track. The work will increase route capacity and reduce journey times between Sheffield and Manchester as faster passenger services will be able to overtake slower moving freight services.
At Chinley station a new overtaking loop is to be constructed along with the ability to terminate Manchester trains without blocking the main line. Trains going beyond Chinley can overtake terminating trains therefore reducing line congestion and increasing opportunities to run additional services.
⓬ Calder Valley (forms part of the Northern Hub scheme) with direct services Chester to Leeds via Calder Valley.
congestion and increasing opportunities to run additional services.
Marple Line speed enhancements with the objective of reducing journey times.
38
Specific Cheshire and Warrington improvements
A Crewe to Holyhead Electrification [electrification]
B Wrexham Central to Bidston Electrification (extension of DC Lines) [electrification]
C Chester to Acton Grange Junction Electrification [electrification]
D Mid Cheshire line electrification and journey time improvements [electrification and upgraded lines]
E CLC Liverpool-Warrington-Manchester line electrification and journey time improvements [electrification and
upgraded lines]
F Rail link to Manchester Airport from CLC Route at Mobberley [new line]
G Frodsham Junction to Halton Junction enhancements and introduction of Liverpool to Chester and Hooton (via
39
Northern Rail and TransPennine Express Refranchising
G Frodsham Junction to Halton Junction enhancements and introduction of Liverpool to Chester and Hooton (via
Ellesmere Port) passenger services [new service and upgraded line]
H Saltney Junction to Wrexham General doubling and line speed improvements (approved scheme) [upgraded lines]
I Improved Connectivity for Winsford, Hartford & Acton Bridge Stations [upgraded lines]
J Northwich / Middlewich / Sandbach (Chord Line) Enhancements and Reintroduction of Passenger Services
[conversion from freight]
Double tracking of parts of the route and increasing current capacity levels by 100%. Train speeds expected to attain 90 mph in some sections.
Cheshire & Warrington SUBREGIONAL
Transport Strategy
C- Rail Freight
.
40
Proposed schemes designed to support the growth of rail-freight in Cheshire,
Warrington and surrounding areas fall into two main groups:
• Schemes currently being considered by Network Rail as part of their strategic
“Northern Ports & Trans Pennine Freight Capacity” study.
• Other schemes for the development of new rail-served terminals required for
delivery of our strategy.
Our ask:
41
MAP ILLUSTRATING LOCATION OF CURRENTLY PROPOSED RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCEMENTS TO
SUPPORT FREIGHT GROWTH IN CHESHIRE & WARRINGTON 42
Northern Ports & Trans Pennine Freight Capacity Proposals
The Strategic Freight Network Steering Group has identified the need to improve capacity and infrastructure capabilityfor freight trains along the Trans Pennine corridor. To accommodate projected growth in the intermodal, waste to energyand biomass sectors improvements are required in the following areas:
• Signalling and permanent way enhancements that provide additional network capacity.
• Improvements in loading gauge.• Elimination of freight specific speed restrictions.• Provision of loops to accommodate freight trains up to 775m in length .• The electrification of the route via Diggle and other initiatives designed to
increase the frequency of TransPennine passenger services also mean that action will need to be taken to safeguard capacity for freight.
❶ Bootle Branch Capacity Enhancements including:
Doubling of connection with NR infrastructure at Regent RoadProvision of additional signalling between Regent Road & Bootle Branch Jnc.Increasing line speed from 20 to 40mphImproved run round facilities at Edge Hill Down Wapping
The following schemes are being considered as part of the above programme:
43
Northern Ports & Trans Pennine Freight Capacity Proposals
❺ Calder Valley Enhancements:
Proposals to improve infrastructure to the east of Manchester.
❹ Northwich Viaduct Line speed Improvements.
❷ Earlestown West to South Doubling including:
Introduction of improved signalling arrangements.
❸ Hartford CLC Junction Line speed Improvement.
Proposals to improve infrastructure to the east of Manchester.
❻ Diggle TransPennine Route Enhancements including:
Proposals to eliminate speed restrictions applicable to trains conveying heavy axleweight vehicles.Provision of loops to accommodate freight trains of up to 775m in length.
44
Northern Ports & Trans Pennine Freight Capacity Proposals
❽ Knowsley Freight Terminal Enhancements:
Improved head-shunt arrangements.
❼ Hope Valley Enhancements:
Reinstatement / enhancement of looping facilities at Chinley, Bamford & Grindleford.
It should be emphasised that the above schemes have only been slated for further development and
analysis and it is likely that only those schemes offering the best economic return will be developed
during the course of CP5/6.
❾ Heaton Norris Junction Line speed Improvement
45
Cheshire & Warrington Schemes:
The following schemes are also being considered and are at various stages of development. All three
schemes relate to rail served terminals that are key economic drivers in our SEP, and are being developed by
Peel Ports.
❾ Heaton Norris Junction Line speed Improvement.
❿ Port Ince (accessed via the former connection at Helsby West Cheshire Junction).
⓬Port Salford (initially a west facing connection on to the Chat Moss lines at Barton Moss).
⓫ Port Warrington (accessed via Walton Old Junction sidings).
46
Cheshire & Warrington SUBREGIONAL
Transport Strategy
D- 2011 Census- Trends Analysis &
Comparisons against 2001
.
47
Cheshire East – Train• More people are using Cheshire East as an origin
rather than a destination.
• Inflows are roughly 2x higher by 2011.
• Manchester has shown a fourfold increase in inflows
becoming the highest inflow (overtaking Stockport).
• Westminster has risen 6 places from 9th to 3rd highest
outflow.
Cheshire East - TrainCheshire East - Train
Location Inflow Outflow Sum Net Change
Manchester 409 1875 2,284 -1466
Stockport 292 329 621 -37
Cheshire West & Chester 167 107 274 60
Westminster, City of London 2 169 171 -167
Birmingham 17 153 170 -136
Liverpool 61 97 158 -36
Trafford 57 99 156 -42
Salford 57 93 150 -36
Stoke-On-Trent 59 91 150 -32
Warrington 50 42 92 8
Shropshire 38 31 69 7
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 47 20 67 27
1,256 3,106 4,362 -1,85048
Cheshire East – Bus
• Bus travel shows the smallest change between 2001 and
2011 of all groups (a net change increase of 45).
• The top 5 inflows origins haven't changed, however
Manchester has risen from 3rd to 2nd (pushing Cheshire
West and Chester down a place).
• Commuting outside the UK has now reached the top 10
outflows.
Cheshire East - Bus
Location Inflow Outflow Sum Net Change
Stockport 268 112 380 156
Manchester 239 70 309 169
Cheshire West & Chester 139 136 275 3
Stoke-On-Trent 111 66 177 45
High Peak 65 57 122 8
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 92 25 117 67
Warrington 18 83 101 -65
Stafforshire Moorlands 87 6 93 81
Trafford 56 29 85 27
Tameside 54 1 55 53
Sheffield 28 1 29 27
Outside the UK 0 16 16 -16
Newport 1 13 14 -12
1,158 615 1,773 543 49
Cheshire East – Car (Driver)
• This was the predominant method of travel for both
years.
• Net change has now became a gain. Largely due to
the ~15% inflow increase.
• Highest outflow has changed from Manchester
(now 2nd) to Cheshire West & Chester. The Lowest
outflow has changed from Tameside (no longer in
the top 10) to Shropshire.
Cheshire East - Driving a car or van
Location Inflow Outflow Sum Net Change
Cheshire West & Chester 7983 7033 15,016 950
Stockport 7178 5846 13,024 1332
Manchester 3059 6941 10,000 -3882
Stoke-On-Trent 3199 3649 6,848 -450
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 3978 2389 6,367 1589
Trafford 2501 3190 5,691 -689
Stafforshire Moorlands 3225 769 3,994 2456
Warrington 1819 1845 3,664 -26
High Peak 1487 705 2,192 782
Shropshire 984 734 1,718 250
Salford 596 1105 1,701 -509
36,009 34,206 70,215 1,803 50
Cheshire West & Chester –
Train• Wirral is the highest inflow origin being roughly 3x higher
than Flintshire in 2001 and Liverpool in 2011.
• Flintshire has dropped from 2nd highest inflow to 5th from
2001 to 2011.
• Liverpool has moved up to the highest outflow location
by 2011.
Cheshire West & Chester - Train
Location Inflow Outflow SumNet
ChangeLocation Inflow Outflow Sum
Change
Liverpool 188 773 961 -585
Wirral 463 200 663 263
Manchester 52 396 448 -344
Cheshire East 107 167 274 -60
Wrexham 92 38 130 54
Warrington 26 93 119 -67
Flintshire 83 30 113 53
Sefton 47 39 86 8
Halton 39 31 70 8
Denbighshire 54 11 65 43
Trafford 9 55 64 -46
Westminster, City of London 0 62 62 -62
Conwy 46 2 48 44
Birmingham 6 32 38 -26
1,212 1,929 3,141 -71751
Cheshire West & Chester –
Bus• Bus travel has shown the smallest change overall with a net
change decrease of 47.
• Knowsley and Sefton are no longer in the top 10 inflows (9th
and 10th respectively) having been replaced by Denbighshire
and Stoke-On-Trent.
• Flintshire’s inflows are around 3x higher than the next highest
inflow.
• People commuting outside the UK from Cheshire West and
Chester has risen to 29 from 0 (and up to 9th).
Cheshire West & Chester - Bus
Location InflowOutflo
wSum Net Change
Flintshire 967 245 1,212 722
Wirral 265 190 455 75
Wrexham 265 46 311 219
Cheshire East 136 139 275 -3
Halton 114 37 151 77
Liverpool 72 68 140 4
Warrington 50 40 90 10
Manchester 30 17 47 13
Harrogate 0 35 35 -35
Outside UK 0 29 29 0
Denbighshire 15 2 17 13
Stoke-On-Trent 12 3 15 9
1,926 851 2,777 1,104 52
Cheshire West & Chester –
Car (Driver)
• Driving is the most predominant method of commuting.
• Overall outflow has shown the lowest change (overall
changing by only 18).
• The top 3 outflows and inflows remain unchanged
between 2001 and 2011.
Cheshire West & Chester - Driving a car or van
Location Inflow Outflow Sum Net Change
Flintshire 8552 6477 15,029 2075
Cheshire East 7033 7983 15,016 -950
Wirral 8368 5247 13,615 3121
Warrington 2158 3445 5,603 -1287
Halton 2216 3366 5,582 -1150
Wrexham 2540 2047 4,587 493
Liverpool 1230 2653 3,883 -1423
Manchester 565 2283 2,848 -1718
Trafford 639 1514 2,153 -875
Denbighshire 802 387 1,189 415
Stockport 462 645 1,107 -183
34,565 36,047 70,612 -1,482 53
Warrington – Train
• Manchester’s outflows increased by around 50%. They
are over twice as high as the next highest outflows
(Liverpool) for both 2001 and 2011.
• Halton had the highest net change for both 2001 and
2011. Manchester the lowest.
• Westminster rises to 6th highest outflow (previously it was
not in the top 10).
Warrington - TrainWarrington - Train
Location Inflow Outflow SumNet
Change
Manchester 184 743 927 -559
Liverpool 262 267 529 -5
Halton 185 25 210 160
St Helens 129 12 141 117
Cheshire West & Chester 93 26 119 67
Salford 51 64 115 -13
Wigan 70 23 93 47
Cheshire East 42 50 92 -8
Trafford 38 41 79 -3
Wirral 51 11 62 40
Knowsley 42 3 45 39
Westminster, City of
London2 39 41 -37
1149 1304 2453 -15554
Warrington – Bus
• There is a ~30% increase in inflows between 2001 and
2011.
• Halton had both the highest inflows and outflows by 2011
(St Helens had higher inflows in 2001).
• Cheshire Easts’ inflows increased 5.5x and raised this
origin from 10th to 5th.
Warrington - Bus
Location Inflow Outflow SumNet
Change
Halton 366 142 508 224
St Helens 298 63 361 235
Wigan 249 43 292 206
Liverpool 147 33 180 114
Manchester 62 51 113 11
Trafford 30 78 108 -48
Cheshire East 83 18 101 65
Cheshire West & Chester 41 51 92 -10
Salford 53 24 77 29
Knowsley 62 13 75 49
1391 516 1907 875 55
Warrington – Car (Driver)
• There is roughly a 10% increase in car drivers from 2001 to
2011.
• Halton’s net change increases 6.7x. It also has both the 3rd
highest inflows and highest outflows for 2001 and 2011.
• Sefton drops from the 10 highest inflows, with
Manchester rising to 9th.
Warrington - Driving a car or van
Location Inflow Outflow SumNet
Change
Halton 4572 4055 8,627 517
St Helens 5566 2236 7,802 3330
Wigan 5657 1788 7,445 3869
Cheshire West & Chester 3445 2158 5,603 1287
Liverpool 2520 2224 4,744 296
Manchester 1408 3180 4,588 -1772
Trafford 1698 2881 4,579 -1183
Cheshire East 1845 1819 3,664 26
Salford 1429 1920 3,349 -491
Knowsley 1197 1050 2,247 147
29337 23311 52648 6026
56