+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Date post: 19-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: job-fisher
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Child Spacing  Close spacing and high fertility are a significant determinant of poor health of mothers and infants – and impacts the health and socio- economic well being of families
15
Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Child Spacing in MCH Programs

Harriet Stanley, [email protected]

Page 2: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Overview

Impact of child spacing on the health of women and children;

FP services in development countries: what we’ve learned

Women’s choices Looking Ahead

Page 3: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Child Spacing

Close spacing and high fertility are a significant determinant of poor health of mothers and infants – and impacts the health and socio-economic well being of families

Page 4: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Mothers

Avoid unsafe abortion; Limit health risks of pregnancy and

childbirth; Limit births to healthiest ages; Limit number of births.

Page 5: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Children

Spacing increases chances of survival significantly;

Healthier birth weights, healthier babies;

Assures babies are adequately breastfed.

Page 6: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Reducing Excess Fertility

Family planning; Delayed marriage; Prolonged breastfeeding; Abortion

Page 7: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Traditional Approaches to Child Spacing

There are many examples of traditional practices that promoted birth spacing:

Women lives with own family; Polygamy; Importance of breastfeeding period.

Page 8: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Changing Trends

In surveys, women report lower desired than actual fertility or that their last birth was unwanted. Even more report that they want no more children. If they do, they want to wait a significant period of time.

Page 9: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Trends

Last 30 years, % couples using contraception from 10% to 50%;

Fertility dropped from average of 6 to 4 children per woman;

FP and socio-economic development both play role to some degree

Page 10: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Family Planning Programs – what we’ve learned

At service delivery level – demand, access, choice of methods, client-centered quality, communication.

At program Admin level – leadership, R&D.

At gov’t policy level – political commitment, financial resources.

Page 11: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Meeting people’s Needs

“Setting targets for contraceptive ‘acceptors’ is not the road to family planning success. Rather, if people

are given the opportunity, they choose family planning when it

meets their needs.”

Page 12: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Field Programs – focus on availability, access and quality

Availability

Page 13: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Field Programs cont’d

Access – understanding the barriers: Distance, time and cost; Gender, caste and class; Economic; Cultural;

Page 14: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Field Programs cont’d

Quality Skilled providers –

at all levels; Safe clinical

practices; Effective

counseling;

Page 15: Child Spacing in MCH Programs Harriet Stanley, PhD

Challenges

Meeting remaining unmet need; Reaching young, unmarried women; Increasing men’s involvement; Linking to broader RH services


Recommended