Chugai Next Generation Factory Concept:Implementation of Continuous Manufacturing Technologies to Bio Pharmaceutical DS Manufacturing
CMC strategy forum Japan2018.12.04
CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.Yasufumi Ueda, Ph.D
1
Contents
Introduction Chugai Next Generation Factory Concept Enabling Technologies and Preliminary Data Hurdles Need to Overcome
2
History of Chugai Bio API manufacturing
Single Use facility
10kL x 2 (2002~2010)
2.5kL x 4(1990~)
1990 Epogen ® JP launch
2005 Actemra® JP launch(CD)
2010 Actemura® US launch(RA)2009 Actemra® EU launch(RA)
1994 Granocyte® EU launch
1991 Neutrogin® JP launch
10kL x6 (2006~)
2kL x 2 (2013~)2kL x 2 (2015~)
Early and Late stage clinical and commercial mfg
2011 Actemra® site addition (RA)
4 2(2016~)
2008 Actemra® JP Applicaition Expansion(RA)
Over 25years, more than 2000 lots !
2013Actemra® SC launch(RA)
Large Stainless facility
3
Current Chugai BiomanufacturingFacility Portfolio
Single useflexible facilityfor multi products in clinical phase Multi product facility
for small to middle scale various demands
Dedicated large scale facility for high demand product
4
New Concept of Production
“Next Generation
Factory”
Cost Pressure
Market Globalization
Demand Variability
Innovative Technology
Current situation and Future challenge facing Biologics production
Ultra-Low Cost Manufacturing for High-variety & Low-amount of Products
• Bio science and technology (Target integration, single-use, etc)
• ICT (Big data, AI, etc)
• Precision and Personalized healthcare
• Various target & molecular formats
• Medical financial difficulty• Severe competition (e.g.
Bio-similar)
• Global supply chain• Emerging market
5
Scope of Next Generation Factory
6
Target Process for NGF, “End to End”Adopt continuous process for fermentation, purification, and Drug Product filling,together with In-line testing for automated process control and real-time release.
“End to End” seamless production from raw material to finish product release
Reduced number & size of equipment, and operators.
Current Process(Fed-batch Culture/Batch Purification)
NGF Process(Perfusion Culture/Continuous Purification, DP)
Fermenter Scale2000 L x 3~6
Fermentation & Harvest Purification
Fermenter Scale (Single-Use)500 L
Batch Process Flow Chart
Column Diameter40~100 cm
Column Diameter (Pre-pack)5~10 cm
Continuous Process Flow Chart
Tank1Tank2Tank3
UF/DFPolish2
Culture
CaptureHarvest
CultureHarvestCapturePolish1UF/DF
Ferm. Harvest Purification Filling
Filling
7
Concept of NGF
Manufacturing amount per year (kg)
Manufacturing cost comparison
10000 L Stainless Steel
Lowering cost , while increasing speed and flexibility
2000 L Single Use500 L NGF
Man
ufac
turin
g co
st (U
SD /g
Mab
)
8
Target numbers of NGF
Low cost manufacturing $100~$400/g → $10-$50/g Delay decision-making on capital investment Fit production scale at right time depending on business environment
Low initial investment Short construction period Low running cost Demand flexibility
1/4 1/2 1/3UK3 $336M → NGF $75M UK3 36M → NGF 12-18M
10-1000 kg/y
ModularSmall ProductivityModular design with ‘box in box’ reconfigurable factory concept
Scale down the facility sizeSmaller equipment, smaller footprint
Batch to continuousHigher productivity in smaller facility
Automation and reduce FTEs
Right decision, right time!
9
Examples of Enabling Technologies
In-line monitoring
Orchestration system
Demand monitoring
Automation
Robotics Multi-column chromatography system
Perfusion culture
Cell line development
Real time release
Data management system
ICT AI
PAT
Continuous filtrationContinuous UFDF
Continuous virus inactivation
Single use
Modular facility engineering
In-line conditioning
We are looking for corroborative partners who have advanced technologies in various fields and cooperate to build NGF with us.
Media development
Novel purification material and device
Direct DP Filling
>> Case Study
Buffer management
>> Case Study
10
In-house Case Study of Perfusion Cultivation
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44
Viab
ility
(%)
VCD
(×10
^5 c
ells
/mL)
Capa
cita
nce
(pF/
cm)
Cultute time (day)
Cell growth result of 1L scale perfusion culture
Target by 20204-5 g/L/dayCurrent
average 1-2 g/L/day
Medium development
Cell line development
Culture method optimization
We have successfully maintained the viable cell density at 700x105 cells/mL for 45 days in a 1 L scale perfusion cultivation system. We are aiming to increase productivity up to 4-5 g/L/day by 2020.
11
Continuous5-column system
Continuous3-column system Batch
System
Resin MabSelect SuRe pcc MabSelect SuRe pcc MabSelect SuRe
HCCF conc. 9.16 g/L * 9.29 g/L * 2.03 g/L
Column height (vol.) 2.5 cm x 5(5 ml x 5)
2.5 cm x 3(5 ml x 3)
20 cm(15.7 ml)
Load Flow rate 270 cm/h 150 cm/h 150 cm/h
IgG binding capacity 62 g/L resin 60 g/L resin 30 g/L resin
Yield** 91% 87% 93%
Number of cycles 378 cycle/day(75 cycle/1 column)
176 cycle/day(58 cycle/1 column) 7 cycle/day
Purification amount 4.7 kg IgG/L-resin/day
3.5 kg IgG/L-resin/day
0.21 kg IgG/L-resin/day
Multicolumn chromatography for Protein A affinity step * concentrated by SP-TFF
X 22
22 times higher productivity was demonstrated by implementing BioSMB, MabSelect SuRePCC and SP-TFF.
in-house data
12
Technical Hurdles in NGF concept
13
• Is Surge Tank necessary ?• How to integrate and control all steps inc.
IT and PAT ?• How to implement virus inactivation step ?• Is MCCS necessary for the polishing steps ?• How to implement filters to remove
precipitation ?
Chrom.1 Chrom.2
Concept of
Surge Tank
Konstantinov and Cooney, ISCMP 2014
whitepaper 4
How to connect USP and DSP, and each DSP steps ?
14
• How to manage max capacity load in scale-down model ?
• Does this twin model work ?
Or?
How to set up Scale-down model for MCCS to validate the process ?
15
Continuous virus filtration
VF step is difficult to be scaled down in continuous process (e.g. filter changing, sanitization, Integrity test…)
Enough membrane size is necessary to be operated in continuous process without filter changing
Is this switching idea
acceptable ?VF by TFF ?
16
UF/DF & Conditioning
Continuous way with single pass TFF and in line DF disposable devices
Semi-continuous way with conventional UF filter Automated conditioning system with PAT
Which way is simpler and more cost effective?
17
Technical Regulatory Hurdles in NGF concept
18
State of Control and unit operation
• How can we define and manage ‘State of Control’ ?• How to manage rejection from the process ?• Definition of ‘Batch’ and ‘Lot’• Relating to PAT (online monitoring)… Is IPC necessary ? Is DS release testing necessary (if DS and DP conducted
continuously) ?
19
Virus safety and virus clearance study design
• How to define maximum cultivation days (CAL study) ?• How to perform virus inactivation step ?• How long will we perform VF study ?• How much samples do we need to prepare enough virus
spiking material ?• Can virus be active and keep good quality during whole study
time ? • Do we need laboratory-scale MCCS in CRO ?
20
Other Thoughts…
• How to implement additional factor ‘Time’ for process validation and characterization study ?
• More strict bioburden and endotoxin control with ‘Time’• Single use equipment reliability (with ‘Time’)• System complexity (a lot of valves and total control) and
durability (periodic maintenance frequency and contents)• Documents Batch record contents (set-up, monitoring, IPC item,
release item) How does CoA look like ?
• OOS and trouble control (no way of return and no rescue ?)
21
We are still have a lot of ‘How’ questions but….
• International Symposium of Continuous manfaucturing of Pharmaceuticals 2014 white paper 4: Published
• BPOG continuous bioprocessing roadmap white paper (https://www.biophorum.com/): Close to be published
• A-Mab Continuous bioprocessing QbD:Will be Published on 1Q 2019
• ICH Q13 Working group• JPMA, AMED, PMDA, J-PDA, FDA etc…
Currently a lot of working groups and white paper
preparation regarding continuous manufacturing is
on going and it will help us a lot !!!
22
Thank you for your attention !Do you have questions and comments ?
Rheinfall in
Switzerland
23
Appendix
24
Biomanufacturing trend and perspective
SpeedCost Flexibility
Payer Cost Pressure Precision and Personalized Medicine
Outcome pursuance Biosimilars
Severe competitionEmerging markets
Non IgG new type products
Demand variability
NGF, Next Generation Factory
Scale Distributed
Large scale stainless steel bioreactor Middle scale single use bioreactor
20 years ago 10 years ago to present
- Low titer < 1g/L- Normal IgG- Block busters- High demand - Stainless steel- Dedicated facility
- High titer 5-10 g/L- Engineered antibody- Rare disease - Low demand - Single-use technology- Multi-product facility
Cost Pressure, Uncertainty, Technology Advancement and Market Growth
25
Perfusion Cultivation■Supply media in constant speed and extract the same amount of Perfusate■Keep the cultivation status as consistent and the cell produce MAbcontinuously ■Productivity/Time is high
Media
Cell bleeding FiltrateMAb
Cell retention device
Perfusate(Cell+MAb)
Perfusate(Cell)
Sen Xu, Biotechnol. Prog., 33:867–878, 2017
26
Mono Column Multi Column
PoolLoad
Equibration
Elute
Regeneration
Waste
Waste
Waste
Multi Column Chromatography System (MCCS)
27