CICALICS Academy and Workshop 2017
Aug. 24-30, 2017
Tsinghua University
Background
The initiative of CICALICS is built upon the experience by academia in innovation studies. The experience
shows that innovation studies can be greatly strengthened when scholars form China and overseas
networks and organize research and training together. The topic of innovation studies has received
increasing support from the political level, from policy makers and business managers and an increasing
number of universities and research institutes has established innovation studies groups or research
centers.
What is CICALICS
The purpose of CICALICS is to be a meeting place for scholars of innovation from innovation studies and
centers in China and using CICALICS to reach and be a member of the global community of innovation
researchers through GLOBALICS (Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and
Competence Building Systems) among others. Another purpose of CICALICS is research training of young
scholars and doctoral students.
The mission of CICALICS includes the following:
1. Invite a limited number of outstanding international innovation scholars to become CICALICS members
which form the outer circle.
2. Create an open national-level network of Chinese innovation scholars – and public administrators /
policy makers which form the inner circle.
3. Central nodes in both the inner and outer circle are the centers for innovation research at Tsinghua
Research Center for Technological Innovation (RCTI), Zhejiang University National Institute of
Innovation Management (NIIM), and the Sino-Danish Center for education and research (SDC) with
University of Chinese Academy of Science.
4. The network organizes two annual events on late August.
• An annual CICALICS Workshop. The 2 days’ workshop normally invites some international scholars,
together with more Chinese participants. The workshop is at time combined with public lectures on
innovation management and policy issues.
• An annual CICALICS Academy, delivering research training to Ph.D. students from China and from
abroad. CICALICS Academy invites both international and Chinese scholars as lecturers, some of
whom would be invited from among the participants in CICALICS Workshop.
Schedule of CICALICS Academy
Morning Session Afternoon Session
August 24
(Thursday)
Room 418
8: 00-8:50am 9:00-12:00am 1:45-5:00pm 6:30-9:30pm
Registration (8:00-
8:30am)
Opening and Group
Picture (8:30-8:50am)
(Prof. Jin Chen)
Firms, complementary
assets and the natural
environment
(Prof. John Ulhoi)
Can a 150 years old
company act like a
start-up?
(Mr. Gerardo MAZZEO,
Global Innovation
Director, Nestle)
Venue: Tsinghua x-lab
What constitutes a
scientific contribution
and scientific impact in
business
administration
(Prof. John Ulhoi)
August 25
(Friday)
Room 418
8: 30-10:00am 10:30-12:00am 1:30-3:00pm 3:30-5:00pm
The institutional foundations of innovation and entrepreneurship
(Prof. Wesley Sine)
CICALICS 2017 Workshop, August 26 ~ 27, 2017 (Saturday & Sunday)
8: 30-10:00am 10:30-12:00am 1:30-3:00pm 3:30-5:00pm
August 28
(Monday)
Room 215
How to run a survey
(Prof. Anthony Arundel)
How to run a survey
(Prof. Anthony Arundel)
Students presentation
(Bohao LI & Wen
LIU)
Students presentation
(Xiao CHEN & Xiuling
LIU)
August 29
(Tuesday)
Room 215
Innovation and
Intellectual Property
Management
(Prof. Can HUANG)
Innovation and
Intellectual Property
Management
(Prof. Can HUANG)
Students presentation
(Po-Hsuan CHEN &
Xiaoting HU)
Students presentation
(Kou KOU & Boxu
YANG)
August 30
(Wednesday)
Room 215
MNCs and innovation
(Prof. Zhenzhen XIE)
MNCs and innovation
(Prof. Zhenzhen XIE)
Meet a better you as
PhD goes on
(Jiamin Zhang)
General discussion &
Closing Session
DATE TIME SESSION CHAIR Presentor Title
8:30 - 9:00
9:00 - 9:15 Open Shulin Gu CICALICS Introduction
9:15 - 10:00Wesley
SineEntrepreneurship & the Institutional Environment
10:00 - 10:45 Can Huang Management Transformation of Huawei
10:45 - 11:00
11:00 - 11:30Anthony
ArundelManaging risk in public sector innovation
11:30 - 12:00 Shulin GuRelationship between Science and Technology--A
Lasting-Daunting Difficulty of STI Policy in China
12:00 - 12:30Olav
SorensenWho dominate the global value system?
12:30 - 14:00
TIME SESSION Presentor Discussant Title
14:00 - 14:30Zhenzhen
XieKent Jensen
Shall an Entrepreneur Choose Business Idea Source to
Match his/her Background? The Contingent Role of
Institutional Environment
14:30 - 15:00Jingjing
Guo
Shahamak
Rezaei
User interaction and new venture growth: the
mediating role of new product development
15:00 - 15:30
Chair:
Anthony
ArundelKent Jensen Can Huang
Early coupling of export-, innovation-, and growth
aspirations: Embedded in nascent entrepreneurs’
networks and institutions
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 16:30
Innovation
and
Globalization
Jun JinOlav
Sorensen
How Overseas R&D Centre to Maximize the Benefits
after cross-board M&A: Case of CEVT of Geely
Group
17:00 - 17:30Chair:
Can Huang
Jianghua
Zhou
Zhenzhen
XieExporting, foreign equity and firm innovation
TIME SESSION CHAIR Presentor Title
16:30 - 17:00Keynote
SpeechesCan Huang Jiang Yu Digital Innovation under Chinese Context
Keynote
SpeechesCan Huang
Innovation
and
Entrepreneur
ship
Have a nice first CICALICS Workshop day !
CICALICS WORKSHOP (August 26-27, 2017) PROGRAM
Room 418, Shunde Building, Tsinghua University SEM
Registration of CICALICS Workshop, Outside of Room 418,
Shunde Building,Tsinghua University
Coffee Break
LUNCH
Jizhen LiKeynote
Speeches
Aug. 26,
2017
Saturday
Coffee Break
CICALICS WORKSHOP (August 26-27, 2017) PROGRAM
Room 418, Shunde Building, Tsinghua University SEM
DATE TIME SESSION CHAIR Presentor Title
Jason Gao Qooco Entrepreneur journey and China strategy
David
Topolewski Qooco global strategy and future rollout planning
Victoria MuQooco products/technologies entry barrier and Scale
globally
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 10:50
10:50 - 11:30Company
PresentationJizhen LI
Chen
ZhaoThe Ultimate Global Innovation Platform
11:30 - 12:00
12:00 - 13:30
TIME SESSION Presentor Discussant Title
13:30 - 14:00 Xiao Chen Bohao Li
How Do Innovation Capabilities of Industrial Cluster
Evolve in the Context of E-Commerce?: A Case Study
from China
14:00 - 14:30Peder Veng
SøbergShulin Gu Technical Knowledge Creation
14:30 - 15:00
Chair:
Jun Jin Bohao LIAnthony
Arundel
A Review Paper for Measuring Design as the Indicator
of Innovation and Structural Transformation: The
Middle-income Trap Perspective
15:00 - 15:30
15:30 - 16:00 Wei GaoJianghua
Zhou
Absorptive Capacity, Cooperation Stability and the
Effect of Innovation Policies: A Case Study of the
Wind Power Industry in China
16:00 - 16:30Po-Hsuan
ChenJun Jin
The evolution of universities in Taiwan’s system of
innovation (1986-2015): the co-patent analysis
16:30 - 17:00Chair:
Shulin GuJunguang
GaoKou Kou
Business collaboration benefiting innovation in small
enterprises
TIME SESSION CHAIR Presentor Title
17:00 - 17:30Keynote
Speeches Shulin Gu
Xiangdong
ChenPatent value
17:30 - 18:00
Innovation
Policy and
System
Coffee Break
Coffee Break
LUNCH
Innovation
and
Capabilities
Company
Presentation
Comments from Jason Gao and Q&A
9:00 - 10:00
Comments from Chen Zhao and Q&A
Jizhen Li
CICALICS Closing Ceremony
Aug. 27,
2017
Sunday
President of the Organising Committee
JIN CHEN, professor of Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and
Strategy in Tsinghua School of Economics and Management. He is also the
Director of Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University.
He received his Bachelor from Zhejiang University in 1989; and Ph.D. in
Management Engineering in the Department of Management also from Zhejiang
University in 1994. He went to MIT Sloan School of Management in 1998 as a
visiting scholar. In 2000, he went to SPRU of Sussex University as a visiting fellow.
Prof. CHEN Jin has been awarded the Outstanding Youth Fund in 2002 by National
Science Foundation of China. In 2009, he was selected for the China’s National
Talents Project. In 2014, he was honored as a distinguished professor of Chang
Jiang scholars, and actually he is the first Chang Jiang scholar in the field of
China’s technological innovation management. His research and teaching mainly
focuses on management of technological innovation.
Prof. CHEN Jin is the editor-in-chief of International Journal of Innovation Studies.
He also serves as the member of editor committee of lot of Journals
Vice-president of the Organising Committee
Jizhen Li, associate Professor of Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship
and Strategy in Tsinghua School of Economics and Management. He is also the
Vice Director of Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University
Jizhen holds a PhD(2002) in Management Science, a MA in Management Science,
and BE(1997) both in Automobile Engineering and Industrial Engineering from the
Tsinghua University. He visited MIT Sloan School of Management as an
International Faculty Fellow for half a year in 2006.
His research interests include management of technological innovation, science &
technology policy, project management, and SMEs Innovation and
Entrepreneurship.
As Principal Investigator, he has finished or is working on more than 20 research
projects, include six research projects funded by NSF of China. He has published
more than 80 journal articles (mainly in Chinese).
Keynote Speakers
Shulin GU, Research Professor at the Institute of Science and Development
Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
She serves also as Advisory Professor at Tsinghua University and Zhejiang
University. In international academic sphere she has had been Globelics (The
Global Network for the Economics of Learning, Innovation and Competence
Building System) Scientific) Board member and now is GLOBELICS Constitution
Committee member. She is also as advisory board member of several international
academic journals. She had worked as Senior Research Fellow at UNU/INTECH
(United Nations University Institute for New Technologies, now UNU/MERIT,
Maastricht, the Netherlands) (1992—2000), and served as a Visiting Professor,
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University(2000-2007).
Her research areas include: S&T policy, S&T system reform in China, innovation
and development studies, innovation policy, institutional change, inclusive and
“green” innovation.
Wesley Sine,Professor of management and organizations at Johnson
Graduate School of Management, Cornell University. He is also the Founding
Director of Cornell Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
His research focuses on the emergence of new economic sectors and
entrepreneurship. His research context includes the United States, Latin America,
and the Middle East. He explores issues related to institutional change, industry
and technology evolution, technology entrepreneurship, and new venture structure
and strategy. He has examined a diverse set of economic sectors ranging from the
electric power industry to the emergence of the Internet. Teaching interests include
entrepreneurship, commercializing university technology, new venture growth, the
management of technology and innovation, and organizational change. He has
consulted and taught executives in Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East.
Prof. Sine has published, provisionally accepted, or papers forthcoming in the
following journals: Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management
Journal, Management Science, Organization Science, Strategic Management
Journal, and Research Policy. Sine is currently a senior editor at Organization
Science and is the book review editor at Administrative Science Quarterly.
Can Huang, Professor, Head of Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship
and Strategy, and Co-Director of Institute for Intellectual Property Management at
School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
He is a member of the Chinese expert group of the U.S.-China Innovation Dialogue
under the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, a member of advisory
board of Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University,
CIPRUN Intellectual Property Management Research Center, University of
Electronic Science and Technology of China, and the Asia Pacific Innovation
Conference. He is also a member of the editorial advisory boards of Science and
Public Policy, NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, African
Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Science and
Management (KeXue Yu Guan Li) and UNESCO Science Report (2015 Edition).
Earlier from 2007 to 2013 he was a Research Fellow and subsequently a Senior
Research Fellow at United Nations University-MERIT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
He holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Management from the University of Aveiro, Aveiro,
Portugal, an M.S. in Engineering and a B.A. in Economics from Renmin University
of China, Beijing, China. He was a visiting research fellow at the Technology Policy
and Assessment Center, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, the United States in 2006. After studying and working in Europe and the
United States for 11 years, he returned to China to join Zhejiang University in
September 2013.
Anthony Arundel, Professor of Innovation at the Australian Innovation
Research Centre (AIRC) at the University of Tasmania and concurrently a
Professorial Fellow at UNU-MERIT, a joint research institute of the United Nations
University and the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands. His research
interests include the innovative activities of firms and public administrative
agencies, the transfer of knowledge between universities and firms, the
socioeconomics of biotechnology, environmental innovation, innovation policy, and
the development of indicators for measuring innovation. He has been involved in
the design and statistical analysis of several largescale questionnaire surveys
including the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) in Europe, several European
Innobarometer surveys, the Australian Public Sector Innovation Indicators (APSII)
survey and the Tasmanian Innovation Census. Recent research has focused on
innovation in the public sector and on the use of innovation survey data for
economic development purposes in regional Australia.
Olav Jull Sørensen, Professor of International Business at Aalborg University
since 1991 and Head of the International Business Centre (IBC) since its
establishment in 1984.
His main research interests are: the internationalisation of companies,
international/global industrial dynamics and value chains, internationalisation and
innovation and governmentbusiness partnership. The topics are being researched
in a developed market perspective as well as a developing/transition country
perspective. He has been a lead scholar in research, capacity building and
educational projects in Africa (Ghana and Tanzania), Eastern Europe (Lithuania
and Russia), and Asia (Vietnam and China).
He is a member of the Academic Council for Social Sciences, Aalborg University
and the Council of the Department of Business and Management, and from 2010
to 2015, he has been the co-director of the Sino-Danish Center (SDC)-Innovation
Management program in China comprising a graduate program, a research
program as well as collaboration with the business community in China.
Jiang Yu, Professor of School of Policy and Management, University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences(UCAS) . He is also the Professor of Institutes of Sciences
and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Prof. Yu is also the Director of
Research Center of Network Innovation and Development, UCAS.
Prof. Yu has worked as the Royal Society International Fellow in Cambridge
University. His main research interest is science policy, digital innovation, industry
evolution and innovation.
Prof. Yu has got the international funding programs from EU-7th Framework project
and Sino-US. innovation collaboration project. He is China’s core expert for EU-
China Innovation Summit and Sino-Germany Innovation Dialogue during 2014-
2017. He has undertaken many strategic research projects for the central
government agencies like MOST, NDRC and SAAC. He also got the Best Paper
Award in IAMOT(International Association for Management of Technology) 2006
Conference.
http://www.iamot.org/
Qooco (巧口) is the leading China-centred global mobile education firm focused on solving the widespread
problem of lots of time spent learning English, but getting no results. The cause of this problem? Less than daily
practice and inadequate feedback. Through Qooco’s proprietary interactive speech analytics and AI technologies,
Qooco has successfully delivered great learner results – spoken English fluency - throughout Asia, a first for a China-
based company.
For thousands of learners, Qooco has consistently delivered superior outcomes more quickly and at far lower costs
than others. Demanding luxury service brands, such as Mandarin Oriental and Four Seasons, insist on using Qooco
for employee assessment and training.
With deep experience in linguistics and speech technologies, Qooco has developed the most advanced speech
technologies for spoken English language learning. Combine that with gamification and huge amounts of data for
AI, Qooco has a powerful adaptive learning platform. Together with certified US English teachers available on
demand, Qooco provides a highly engaging experience, driving long term usage, which is critical for successful
language learning.
Qooco’s mix of B2B2C and B2C is complementary, resulting in improved financial performance and more customer
leads for enterprise customers and superior student outcomes, at a cost that is affordable in tier 5 cities.
A game-changer.
Dr. Jason Gao, Chairman of Qooco China. In the last seven years, Dr. Gao has
focused on building the Qooco China business, strategy, and teams. Dr. Gao has
extensive experience in software development as well. Dr. Gao earned his MS
and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Brigham Young University and BS in Industry
Management Engineering, Tongji University in Shanghai.
David Topolewskiis, CEO of Qooco, where he is responsible for business
development, technology development, and strategy. A strong proponent of m-
learning, Mr. Topolewski has pursued the development of blended learning
solutions, combining technology and teachers, to reach the underserved and
provide new life opportunities through education. He has worked at numerous
technology, design, and investment banking firms. Mr. Topolewski earned his BA
in Economics at Yale University and his MBA at the Wharton School, at the
University of Pennsylvania.
Victoria Mu, President and CTO. With over fifteen years of software
development experience in delivering commercial applications and solutions to the
market, Ms. Mu has responsibility for Qooco product development. She has worked
at IBM, Ticketmaster, and other tech companies. Ms. Mu earned her BS at TongJi
University in Shanghai and her MS at Brigham Young University.
Chen Zhao
Managing Partner (China CEO)
Chen is currently spearheading Plug and Play Tech Center's startup accelerator
and investment initiatives in China. He manages a team that are specialized in both
growing local technology startups and helping cutting edge global companies enter
into and expand their businesses in China market. Since 2013, Plug and Play
China has been in operation in 8 cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Suzhou, Hangzhou,
Zhengzhou, Xi’an, Chongqing and Shenzhen), and Chen’s led and participated in
investment and cross-border acceleration of over 60 startups in both China and the
U.S., including Intviu.com, Xberts.com, iDareX.com, Vocore.io, Lepow, Acton,
Kadho, Crazybaby, etc. Prior to Plug and Play, Chen worked as the team lead and
Sr. Software Engineer at Investment Technology Group (NYSE:ITG), where he led
a development team in designing and implementing various Equity and Foreign
Exchange trading analytics applications for institutional investment firms. Chen
holds an MBA from UCLA Anderson School of Management, MS from USC and BS
from Beihang University in Computer Science.
Xiangdong CHEN, professor at the School of Economics and Management,
Beihang University, Beijing, China,
In the fields of international technology transfer and innovation studies, he teaches
subjects in recent years include international economics, international finance,
international business management, international technology transfer, and
innovation management; his major research fields in recent years are in Intellectual
Property Management, patent evaluation, patent based emerging technologies,
university-industrial technology transfer, and regional as well as national innovation
system.
He got his doctor degree on Economics and Social Science, from Dept. of Social
Science, University of Potsdam, Germany. He is also a Visiting Scholar at
Manchester Business School, UK. 1992-1993; Visiting Professor at Nante
Graduate School of Management, France. 1999;Visiting Professor at University
of Potsdam, Germany; 2001, 2009; Visiting Research Fellow at City University of
Hong Kong, China, 2003, 2004, 2009; Visiting Professor at NISTEP, Japan; 2006;
Visiting Professor at KIEP, Korea. 2007
Professor Chen was invited as Keynote Speaker at numbers of international
conferences and workshops in USA, Germany, Canada, Netherland, United
Kingdom, Brazil, Finland, Sweden, Japan, Korea, and China.
Papers Abstract
User interaction and new venture growth: the mediating role of
new product development
Sustainable innovation activities often do not stand alone; they sometimes require interdependent innovations on the
part of other actors within the innovation ecosystem (Adner, 2006; Adner & Kapoor, 2010; Still et al, 2014). Users can be
included as one important part of the innovation ecosystem. When involving users in the innovation process, firms are able
to articulate sticky and difficult-to-transfer customer needs into concrete product specifications (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2006;
von Hippel, 2001), which further enhance their profitability and growth. For new ventures, interacting jointly with users
can channel their energies towards efficient and speedy innovation decision making (Lumpkin & Dess, 1995) and
overcome the liability of newness (Stinchcombe, 1965). Considering the importance of user interaction for new venture
growth, one key research question then is as follows: how user interaction affects new venture growth?
Despite the increasing significance, this issue has not been sufficiently addressed within existing research thus far.
First, prior research on user interaction is mainly set in the context of dominant firms or established firms (Gawer &
Cusumano, 2002; Hienerth et al., 2014; Iansiti & Levien, 2004; Foss et al., 2011; Lilien et al. 2002; Urban & von Hippel,
1988). However, little academic research has focused on user interaction undertaken by new ventures, of which user
interaction pattern might be quite different. Dominant firms or established firms have more sufficient organization slack
to support their indigenous innovation and growth (Guo et al., 2015); whereas new ventures have limited and often
specialized assets and resources (Larraneta et al., 2012), and they may interact with users more actively to create innovative
products and services. Besides, new ventures do not possess complex and multiple product lines as dominant firms or
established firms have, they will provide a relatively pure context to connect the links between pre-commercialization
engagement and commercialization outcome (Clarysse et al., 2014; Heirman & Clarysse, 2007). Second, there is still much
work to be conducted to explore how user interaction affect firm growth in a more integrated and systematic way (Gemser
& Perks, 2015). On one hand, we argue that previous focus on bilateral interactions between users and firms should be
shifted toward exploring joint interaction with different types of users and investigating the distinct extent of user
involvement during innovation process. On the other hand, referring to Knudsen (2007) and von Hippel (2001), we
demonstrate that new product development plays a prominent mediating role between the relationship of user interaction
and new venture growth.
To bridge these gaps, we demonstrate how user interaction affects new venture growth through new product
development. To be specific, we focus on two components of user interaction: the breadth and the depth. Similar to Laursen
& Salter (2006), the breadth of user interaction is defined as the number of different types of users involving in the
interaction process of solving problems collectively, while the depth of user interaction refers to the extent to which users
are deeply engaged in firms’ innovation process. Together these two variables reflect the openness of firms’ interactions
with users. We assert that when both the breadth and the depth of user interaction functions effectively, new ventures will
be able to enhance the number of new product development and the speed of new product development, and further
improve growth performance.
This paper makes a contribution through investigating the openness of user interactions on the basis of breadth and
depth dimensions, and this categorization can help fully capture how user interaction exerts distinctive influence on new
ventures growth. Besides, through demonstrating the mediating role of new product development between user interaction
and new venture growth, this study sheds light on the value capture mechanism of new ventures (Moore, 1996; Iansiti &
Levien, 2004; Adner, 2006; Ritala et al., 2013).
Early coupling of export-, innovation-, and growth aspirations: Embedded in nascent
entrepreneurs’ networks and institutions
Abstract
Global business goes hand in hand with innovation and growth, frequently. These pursuits are often
created jointly during start-up of a business, expectedly, and they may be embedded in networks. The
purpose is to account for how transnational and local networks around entrepreneurs are enhancing and
constraining the early coupling of export, innovation and growth-aspirations, and how the coupling of
these aspirations is further embedded in institutions in society. The question is addressed with a globally
representative sample of entrepreneurs, surveyed for the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Efforts to
export, to innovate and to grow are found to be created together, often already during conception of
businesses, with a coupling that is loose rather than tight. This coupling is promoted by entrepreneurial
networking in the transnational sphere and in the sphere of business operations, but is diminished by
networking in the private sphere. The coupling is further embedded in institutions in society. The quality
of institutions promotes an early coupling among entrepreneurs’ export, innovation and growth
aspirations, and enhances the benefits of transnational and operational networks, but aggravates the
detriment of private sphere networking for a strong coupling.
Exporting, Foreign Equity and Firm Innovation
This study focuses on the effect of foreign equity and exporting on a focal firm’s innovation performance,
as well as the moderating effects of state ownership and innovation capability. We find that the foreign
equity has a J-curved impact on firms’ innovation performance, while exporting has a positive linear
effect on firm’s innovation performance. We also find evidence that in such an international innovation
projects, the state ownership and innovation capability of a firm can positively moderate the foreign
equity/exporting performance relationships.
Innovation performance
Exporting
Innovation capability
State ownership
Foreignequity
Conceptual Framework and Research Model
How Do Innovation Capabilities of Industrial Cluster Evolve in the
Context of E-Commerce?: A Case Study from China
Abstract
The amount of e-commerce conducted has grown exponentially as the development of internet. So far,
some studies focus on the impacts of e-commerce on competitiveness on the level of enterprises.
However, many researchers pay little attention to this topic on the industrial clusters level. The
mechanisms between development of e-commerce and industrial clusters have not been discovered yet.
As vital sources of national competiveness, industrial clusters play a pivotal role in the development of
industry. In the context of e-commerce, some clusters can leverage the openness, ease of use, and
transactional efficiencies it brings about to improve their innovation capabilities and subsequently
improve the competitiveness. But some don’t gain advantages from it. Because the fact that knowledge
spillover and the motive of imitation, enterprises in industrial cluster has a high risk of product
homogeneity and intense price competition. In the long run, their innovation capabilities may be
impaired.
This paper explores how different industrial clusters confront the new conditions and how their
innovation capabilities evolve in the context of e-commerce using case from China.
Absorptive Capacity, Cooperation Stability and the Effect of Innovation Policies:
A Case Study of the Wind Power Industry in China
Abstract
Establishing appropriate policies to promote stable cooperation in the area of open innovation policy
constitutes an urgent problem for both current theoretical research. Moreover, practical operation in this
field. The absorption ability, cooperation frequency and technology value of an enterprise directly influence
the choice of partners, thereby affecting the stability of cooperation. By constructing a dynamic game model
and taking policy into consideration, this paper analyzes the influence of absorptive capacity, cooperation
frequency and technology value factors on cooperation stability and detects the role and effect of the policy
on the innovation process by introduction of stochastic simulation. Only when the value of absorptive
capability and technology exceeds a certain threshold, can policy funding improve the probability of
positive cooperation behavior of enterprises, otherwise it will exacerbate non-cooperative behavior. By
reducing the subjectivity of the test process and objectively presenting random process, this study provides
a valid theoretical basis for the selection of open innovation policy tools and action points.
The evolution of universities in Taiwan’s system of innovation (1986-2015):
the co-patent analysis
Abstract
This paper examines the co-evolutions among institutions, triple-helix interactions, and performance in
Taiwan’s system of innovation over last three decades. Especially, it focuses on the co-evolution between
institutions and university-centric triple-helix interactions. Based on dataset of the university co-patents
granted in the 1986-2015 USPTO, the evolution of university-centric interactions in Taiwan’s system of
innovation is investigated. The paper further utilized the patent analysis and network analysis to
demonstrate interactions among universities, industries, and research institutes. The results not only
demonstrate the coevolution among university, industry, and research institute within Taiwan’s system of
innovation, but also show the impact of triple-helix interactions on the transformation of industrial and
technological development. The paper concludes that the Taiwanese universities have gradually
transformed from the loose-coupled, interactive to dense network-typed systemic interactions during the
past three decades, and the triple-helix interactions co-evolve with industrial transformation in Taiwan’s
innovation system. Some managerial and policy implications are provided.
Business collaboration benefiting innovation in small enterprises:
China compared to Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria and Thailand
Abstract
Purpose. – Innovation in society benefits from collaboration among the participants in the national
innovation system (NIS), notably the firms. Indeed, an ongoing institutional change in the NIS is the
promotion of collaboration. The question is whether the benefit of collaboration for innovation of
small enterprises in China is typical or exceptionally different from other developing countries.
Research design and data. – China is compared to Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand and Nigeria, where
comparable and large surveys have recently been performed by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor,
with measures of business collaboration and innovation, amenable to hierarchical linear modeling,
with direct effect of collaboration on innovation, moderated by country, so as to discern differences in
benefit.
Findings. – The benefit of collaboration for innovation of small firms in China is found to be
negligible, like in Brazil and Indonesia, whereas the benefit is substantial in Thailand and in Nigeria.
The benefit is interpreted as resulting from quality of institutions, which is associated with wealth in a
society.
Contributions. – The findings contribute to understanding collaboration as a systemic property
benefiting innovation of small firms in society, with an embeddedness in institutions that moderates
the benefit, in China and in other developing countries.
Research Centre for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University
Tsinghua University Research Centre for Technological Innovation (RCTI) was founded in March 2000,
developed out of the major-subject of Management of Technological Economics, Tsinghua University,
headed by Professor Emeritus Jiaji Fu, who is one of the forerunners in conducting research on
technological innovation. In 2004, RCTI was conferred as Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social
Science in Universities by Ministry of Education. The current director of RCTI is Professor Chen Jin.
From 2007 to 2016, based on major real problems on China’s Innovation and Development, RCTI aimed
at the international forefront of discipline, conducted a number of high level scientific researches and
obtained a series of remarkable achievements. The researchers in RCTI have undertook more than 50
projects funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, 17 key Projects of Key Research Institute
of Humanities and Social Science in Universities by Ministry of Education, and have already published
1500 papers in total, and more than 90 books.
RCTI has cooperated with several famous research in globe, e.g. SPRU (Science Policy Research Unit,
University of Sussex, UK), The Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), and well-known
enterprises, e.g. CRRC Corporation, Haier Group, Midea Group.
The vision of RCTI is to further enhance academic research standards while keep innovate current
institutional system in order to become a world first-rate research institution and think tank which has
influential academic papers in internationally authoritative academic journals. RCTI will construct long-
term institutionalized cooperation with internal research institutions for top of the class scientific
collaborations to produce ground-breaking research outcomes that is influential to both the country and
outside world. RCTI aims to assist in critical governmental decision making process and give our research
results as a form of support, and also to provide guidance to corporations in their practice of innovation
management to generate both social and economic benefits.