/
t CiEOSICi Inc. /1j EXPERTS-CONSEILS EN GEOPHYSIQUE
Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd.
Project 246.01
August 23rd, 2004
Induced Polarization survey
Hemlo 1 Property,
Bomby Lake Area
42 C/12
Work Report
Simon Tshimbalanga, Eng.
3700, boul. de la Chaudiere, Sainte-Fay (Quebec), G1X 487 Telephone: (418) 877-7382 Telecopieur: (418) 877-4054
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. IN'fRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2
2. PROPERTY, LOCALICA TION, ACCESS, OWNERSHIP AND CLAIMS ................................................................................................................... 2
3. PREVIOUS WORKS IN THIS AREA ......... H ........ u ..................................... ~ .. ....... 3
4. PROPERTY GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 3
5. FIELD WORK, PROCEDURE AND INSTRUMENTS ......................................... 3
6. INDUCED POLARIZATION (lP) SURVEY ......................................................... .4
6.1 Purpose of the IP survey ................................................................................ .4
6.2 Presentation of results ..................................................................................... 5
6.3 Usefulness of the Normalized Chargeability .................................................. 6
6.4 Probability ofIP anomalies ............................................................................ 6
7. DESCRIPTION OF THE IP SURVEY ................................................................... 7
7.1 Resistivity ....................................................................................................... 7
7.2 Chargeability ................................................................................................... 7
7.3 Normalized chargeability ................................................................................ 8
7.4 Description ofIP anomalies ............................................................................ 8
8. DISCUSSION OF THE IP RESULTS ..................................................................... 8
9. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 9
LIST OF MAPS
DESCRIPTION TABLE OF IP ANOMALIES
LOCATION MAP
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
CLAIM MAP and CLAIM ABSTRACTS
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
GEOSIG Inc.
2
1. INTRODUCTION
At the request of Mr. Ray Skogsberg, from Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd., an Induced Polarization (IP) survey was run in August 2004 on the Hemlo 1 Property by GEOSIG INC., a consulting firm in geophysics. This property is located in Bomby Lake Area, northern Ontario. The survey was carried out to determine if there is any specific response in testing the extension of the Corona gold-bearing horizon.
This report is a technical report that describes only the geophysical surveys.
2. PROPERTY, LOCATION, ACCESS, OWNERSHIP AND CLAIMS
The Hemlo 1 Property is located in Bomby township (3173), east of Marathon, Ontario. The survey property is located in Bomby Lake area, in Thunder Bay Mining Division. The central part of the grid is approximately located at UTM (zone 15, NAD 83) coordinates 5 394 625mN and 582 750mB. From Thunder Bay, the Property can be easily reached via highway 17 then via the Yellow Brick Road, 1 km east of Hemlo, approximately 330 km east of Thunder Bay, Ontario. The grid can be accessed by the drill road crossing the claim. (See Location Map ).
One unpatented claim block, TB 3011091 makes up the Hemio 1 Property (see Claim Map). The claims are owned by Ray Skogsberg (35%) and Kenneth Lambert (65%).
GEOSIG Inc.
- 3 -
3. PREVIOUS WORKS IN THIS AREA
No known exploration work was conducted on the property prior to 1982.
1982 - Arctic Red Resources Corp. conducted geophysical, geochemical and geological surveys over the property.
1983 - Arctic Red Resources Corp. drilled one hole (DDH AR-l) to test the extension of the Corona gold-bearing horizon. The only interesting mineralization encountered in the hole was intersected between 1 833.6 and 1 834.1 m, in which a sericitic siliceous unit contained minor molybdenite mineralization.
2004 - Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd., conducted a geophysical survey over the property. A grid was cut over the above-mentioned claim and a magnetic survey was carried out on the property.
4. PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The northeast portion of the claim block is underlain by a massive equigranular grey granite (the Cedar Lake pluton), which contains magnetite. The other parts of the claim is underlain by metasediments, consisting predominantly of metasiltstones
5. FIELD WORK, PROCEDURE AND INSTRUMENTS
The grid extends in a SE-NW direction with NE-SW lines from 0+50N to 5+60N, with 50 m between each line. A base line intersects the grid at 0+00. Lines were cut for a total of 4.3 km.
The IP survey covered approximately 3 km of grid lines that includes lines 1 +OON to 5+ ION. Lines 0+50N and 5+60N were too short to be covered by the IP. The length of lines covered by the IP survey varies from 175 meters to 425 meters.
The preliminary results were processed on the field for a quality controL
The Induced Polarization method was performed in the time domain mode with a standard waveform: 2 seconds ON, 2 seconds OFF. We used a dipole-dipole array, with a = 25m electrode spacing and n = 1 to 6 separations. Readings were taken every 25 meters.
GeOSIG Inc.
- 4 -
Steel pin electrodes were used for the receiver and the transmitter. On the receiver electrode spreads, pots electrodes (filled with a Copper Sulphate solution) were used in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The following equipment was used:
Receiver: Elrec-6 built by IRISIBRGM, sin 108
Transmitter: T3P 207 1.4 KW built by Instrumentation GDD Inc.
The receiver read out chargeability (M) within 0.1 msec on ten windows, which were added up with the following formula:
NORMALIZED IP CURVE (Newmont standard IP decay curve):
N = (l60M 1 K1+ 160M2K2 + 160M)KJ ~ 160M4K4 + 160MSKS + 160M6K6 + 160M7K7 + 160Mg K8 +
160M9K9 + !60MlOK]0)f 1600.
Pierre Simoneau, geol. Msc. was the party chief and he was assisted by Georges Tiliki, eng. and the following technicians:
- Mathieu Bolduc, Technician
- Mamert Khorto, Technician
- Jason Chedore, Technician
- Seppo Tapio, Technician
The report was written by Simon Tshimbalanga, eng. Maps and pseudo-sections were interpreted by Pierre Simoneau and finalized by Donald Saindon.
6. INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP) SURVEY
6.1 Purpose of the IP survey
An IP survey is usually done in order to detect conductive and/or polarizable materials such as sulfides or graphite. Therefore, the survey consists in measuring the chargeability (M) and the apparent resistivity (R) along the grid lines surveyed.
Theoretically, the resistivity map should pinpoint conductive sulfides or graphite bodies. In reality, resistivity maps usually reflect variations in the conductivity and thickness of the overburden. The chargeability (M) measurements do allow the detection of sulfides or graphite bodies, either massive or disseminated, as the overburden seldom if ever shows any chargeability.
GEOSIG Inc.
- 5 -
In areas of variable overburden conductivity, chargeability "anomalies", even over massive sulfide bodies, are subdued where the surface conductivities are high. Readings may be lower over sulfide bodies covered by clays (as low as 3 msec) than over non-mineralized but highly resistive volcanic outcrops (10 to 20 msec). To interpret an IP survey with such variations, both sets of measurements, chargeability and resistivity, must therefore be studied together. This is why we prepared normalized chargeability (NC) maps as they better reflect the actual distribution of sulfides and other polarizable materials. Resistivity and raw chargeability maps are also drawn.
6.2 Presentation of results The results of the survey are presented at a 1: 1 500 scale. On map # 6491, we plotted the three profiles at the following scales:
Chargeability (M) Surface resistivity (R)
5 msec/cm Logarithmic scale:
1 to 1 000000 Q-m, 1 cm per decade 1000 Q-meters centred on the line
Normalized chargeability (NC) 5 mhosec/cm
The localization of IP conductors is mostly based on the shape of the NC profiles, which were calculated from M and R with the following formula:
NC R
where: NC R M Vp I a n 9,58
= 9,58 * M/vR = 1C * a * n (n+ 1) * (n+ 2) * Vp/I, dipole-dipole array
normalized chargeability, mhosec = apparent surface resistivity, Q-meters = chargeability read on the receiver display, msec. = voltage between receiver electrodes, mvolts
current transmitted, milli-amperes electrode spacing, meters
= number of separations = normalization factor
We gave the name of mho sec to the normalized chargeability as it is obtained by multiplying the conductivity (IIR) measured in mhos by the chargeability (milliseconds), or mhosec. By combining those two parameters, we created the new name, mhosec.
GEOSIG Inc.
- 6 -
The resistivity, chargeability and normalized chargeability, also at the first separation, have been contoured and they respectively appear on maps # 6492, 6493 and 6494. The results are also presented as colour contoured pseudo-sections at the 1: 1 500 scale. The interpretation of the IP survey is based on the pseudo-sections, which was then transferred on the profiles.
6.3 Usefulness of the Normalized Chargeability An IP survey consists in measuring the apparent resistivity and chargeability between four electrodes in order to predict the distribution of sulfides and other polarizable materials such as graphite. From those two parameters, we calculate the Normalized Chargeability (NC) using the formulas mentioned above. In areas of variable overburden conductivity, the application of the NC filter compensates for the high background chargeability observed in areas of high resistivity (outcrops or outcrops covered by very thin overburden) or the extremely low background chargeability observed in areas of swamps and conductive overburden.
The purpose of the exercise is to refine the NC so that a given mass of sulfides is represented by an anomaly of, at least, very approximately the same amplitude, whatever the nature and depth of the surface overburden.
6.4 Probability of IP anomalies In an attempt to clarifY our reports, we add one parameter to the description of each anomaly. In geophysics, we may express the probability that a bedrock source anomaly exists. Here is an explanation of that parameter we will use to better describe the anomalies of our surveys:
- A 0.9 probability indicates that the anomaly is actually present in the bedrock and that it will be intersected in more than nine out of ten attempted drill holes. A miss on such an anomaly means that there is either a mistake in chaining, or that the drill hole crossed the anomaly through a dyke, a faulted offset, or a local "barren" hole. Anyone with experience in a mine will testifY that such occurrences can occasionally happen.
- A 0.5 probability means that the signature of the anomaly is somewhat doubtful, the signal-to-noise ratio is less than 3, either because the overburden is deep or because of the interference of an adjacent stronger anomaly. The probability that the anomaly corresponds to a target is therefore lowered to a point where only one in two of such drill holes will hit a target. For example, if a target is small but of cylindrical shape, a drill hole collared too far away may completely miss the anomaly if the cylinder has a lateral rake. Any target having a 0.5 probability should be drilled if the local geology is favourable or if targets are few or far
GEOSIG Inc.
- 7 -
between. Out of the thousands of drill holes that we have recommended up to now, only six have resulted in mining operations. For three out of these six mines, the first drill hole was spotted on a doubtful anomaly where the probability was about 0.5 or, in other words, there was only one chance out of two to explain the anomaly by a bedrock source. And yet, most DDH are drilled on anomalies that have a probability of 0.9.
- A 0.2 probability means that, on the average, only one drill hole in five will intersect a sulfide concentration important enough to explain the anomaly. It is often much better to drill such weak IP anomalies if the geology is favourable than to select diamond drill targets at random, or even to select magnetic anomalies or VLF targets. When comparing targets for example, we believe that the probability is much less than 0.1, that an "average" magnetic anomaly will correspond to sulfides or graphite and, if we consider VLF anomalies in clay areas, the probability is lower than 0.05, or hardly better than luck. However, VLF anomalies where the overburden is resistive may be just as reliable as MaxMin or Pulse surveys in outcrop areas, or where the overburden is non conductive.
7. DESCRIPTION OF THE IP SURVEY
7.1 Resistivity
The apparent resistivity on this area varies from less than 18 Q-meters to more than 15 000 Q-meters and there is no evident background value since the resistivity seems to show a gradient increasing from southwest to northeast. As mentioned earlier, the resistivity maps usually reflect variations in the conductivity and thickness of the overburden. Nevertheless, the variation of the resistivity on an IP survey is also often associated with the different types of rocks where the overburden is shallow.
7.2 Chargeability
The background chargeability stands around 4.5 msec and the anomalies stand out of the background.
GEOSIG Inc.
- 8 -
7.3 Normalized chargeability The background NC value is around 0.5 mhosec. Generally, with such a low reference level, even small amounts of sulfides give a clear anomaly. The application of the normalized chargeability filter shows its utility here. Indeed, it compensates for the high background chargeability observed in the central part of the grid, all along the base line.
The individual anomalies are described in the table below.
7.4 Description of IP anomalies
For this survey, we have been able to localize and describe 3 IP anomalies. The annexed table summarizes the main characteristics of the IP anomalies of this survey. In the priority given in the description table, only the geophysical characteristics are considered.
8. DISCUSSION OF THE IP RESULTS
The three IP anomalies detected on this property seem to be closely related to geological structures. Indeed, IP-I extends in the vicinity of the contact of a Metasediments and a Metasediments with Hematite units. IP-2 seems to follow closely the contact between the Cedar Lake Pluton and a Metasediments unit and, IP-3 corresponds to an inferred Granitic dyke. All three anomalies could be related to sulphide mineralization.
IP anomalies axis IP-1 and IP-2 show discontinuity that probably reflects structural effects like faults. The discontinuity on IP-I occurs between lines 2+50N and 3+00N and the one on IP-2 is located between lines 2+00N and 2+50N.
The drill hole (DOH AR-1) done in 1983 by Arctic Red Resources Corp. to test the extension of the Corona gold-bearing horizon seems to have missed IP-2 anomaly but it could have intersected IP-I. The only interesting mineralization encountered in the hole was intersected between 1 833.6 and 1 834.1 m, in which a sericitic siliceous unit contained minor molybdenite mineralization.
GEOSIG Inc,
9. CONCLUSION
This geophysical campaign gave interesting information about the Hemlo 1 Property and the decision to perform an IP survey on this property comes out as a judicious one.
The IP survey carried out on this property led to the detection and description of 3 anomalies. Most of the IP anomalies on the Hemlo 1 Property seem to be related to geological structures.
Although not all IP anomalies will lead to economic discoveries, the results obtained in this area make this method one of the best with regard to the quality of targets versus prospecting costs.
In order to better quality the anomalies it would be important to match all the former exploration results with the type of IP anomaly encountered. However, it has been proven in many cases that even weak anomalies may indicate the presence of interesting mineralization content. Therefore, all the IP anomalies, even the weak one should be investigated either by drilling or by stripping and trenching.
GEOSIG Inc.
LIST OF MAPS
Scale: 1: 1 500
I M # ap T't1 I e
I 6491 IP survey Profiles and Po stings
6492 IP survey Resistivity
6493 IP survey Chargeability !
6494 IP survey Normalized Chargeability
CiEOSICi Inc.
GEOSIG Inc.
Description table of IP anomalies - Hemlo 1 Property
# From To Length Target IP Resis. NC Proba- Prio- Comments Ln/Stn Ln/Stn (m) Ln/Stn (msec) (Q-m) (mhosec) bility rity
I back I back I back
IP-l 2+00N 5+JON 310 3+50N 9.1/3.5 1651 1 gradient 2.1/0.5 0.7 2 Increase ofIP corresponding to a drop of resistivity. I+OOW O+12E O+25W The drop of Resistivity is mostly evident in depth.
Extends very close to a geological contact between two different units of Metasediments. Possible extension to the northeast.
IP-2 J+OON 4+10N 310 3+00N 52.0/5 18/> 5K 118/0.5 0.9 1 Very strong increase ofIP showing a very strong O+62E O+87E O+62E resistivity drop. The anomaly seems to correspond to
the geological contact between the Cedar Lake Pluton unit and a Metasediments unit. Possible extension to both sides.
IP-3 I+OON 2+00N 100 2+00N 16/5 8414 1 uniform 1.6 I 0.5 0.7 1 Medium IP anomaly occurring in a higher resistivity O+OOE O+37E O+37E area. IP-3 corresponds to an inferred Granitic dyke.
Possible extension to the southeast.
HEMLO 1 PROPERTY Superior Lake
j \
\ l
MAP
I ~'
/ I )
"
CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATIONS
J, Simon Tshimbalanga, 1064, rue du Domaine, Cap-Rouge, Quebec, hereby certifY:
1. I am a graduate ofUniversite Laval at Quebec (1979) with an Engineer degree in Geology.
2. I have been employed as an exploration Engineer and Geologist on a full time basis since 1977.
3. I am presently employed as a project Geologist with GEOSIG Inc. of 3700 Chaudiere Blvd., Sainte-Foy, Quebec, since 1980.
4. I own no direct, indirect or expect to receive any contingent interests in the subject properties or shares or securities of Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd.
5. I am a member of l'Ordre Des Ingenieurs du Quebec (OIQ), the Association Professionnelle des Geologues et Geophysiciens du Quebec (APGGQ), and of the (AEMQ) Association de l'Exploration Miniere du Quebec.
6. I have disclosed in this report all relevant material which, to the best of my knowledge, might have a bearing on the viability of the project and the recommendations presented.
<::-::::---7 ~L--t=
Simon Tshimbalanga, Eng.
Geosig Inc.
Dated at Sainte-Foy, Quebec, this 23th day of August 2004
GSOSIG Inc.
, .. - --_ .. ... ,_._ .. _---.... .",-- --_ .... ..-...... ---,------
Olf]1OlUO -------CA NADA
~_'AIIEA _. ~--'''----o D o • • o
• ~
-.-
-
-,-0 ...... _-0 ---0 ---0 _ .. _-0 ---0 ----~ 0 _ .. _-
~ ---~ ---~ 8 ----8 ----r-~-, __ L.!'!"'..J ,-_ .. , -.. -,.<~.;
=
CLAIM MAP
CLAIM NUMBER: Unit Size: Township/Area: Lot Description: Staker: Recorded Holder: Recording Date: Due Date: Work Required: Total Applied: Work Performed:
Mining Lands - Mining Claims Summary
TB 3011091 1 BOMBY (G-3173) \r\n SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD (1000152) SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD ( 35.00 %) 2003-Aug-26 2005-Aug-26 400 o o
Total Reserve: 0 Present Work Assignment: 0 Claim Bank: 0 Claim Status:
CLAIM NUMBER: Unit Size: Township/Area: Lot Description: Staker: Recorded Holder: Recording Date: Due Date: Work Required: Total Applied: Work Performed: Total Reserve:
ACTIVE
TB 3011091 1 BOMBY (G-3173) \r\n SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD (1000152) LAMBERT, KENNETH HENRY ( 65. 00 %)
2003-1'.ug-26 2005-Aug-26 400 o o o
Present Work Assignment: 0 Claim Bank: 0 Claim Status: ACTIVE
© Copyright 2001 Queen's Printe:r for Ontario
This information is provided as a public service, but we cannot guarantee that the information is current or accurate. Readers should verifY the information before acting on it.
GEOSIG Inc.
The Tx II 1400-W I.P. Transmitter Specifications
GENERAL • Size: 21 x 34 x 39 cm • Weight: approximately 20 kg • Operating temperature: -40·C to 65·C
ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS • Used for time-domain LP.: 2 sec. ON, 2 sec. OFF • Output current range: 0.005 to 10 A • Output voltage range: 150 to 2000 V
CONTROLS • Power ON/OFF • Output voltage range switch: 150 V. 350 V. 500 V,
700 V, 1000 V, 1400 V, 2000 V
DISPLAYS • Output current LCD: reads to ± 0.001 A • Standard LCD heater for very cold weather • Total protection against short circuits even at zero
(0) ohms • Indicator lamps:
- High voltage ON/OFF - Output overcurrent - Generator over or undervoltage - Overheating - Logic failure - Open loop protection
POWER • Recommended motor/generator set:
standard 120 V /60 Hz backpackable Honda generator (650.1400, or 1900 W)
GOO Instrumentation GDD inc.
3700, boul. de la Chaudiere Sainle-Foy (Quebec) Canada G1X4B7
Tel. : (418) 877-4249 Fax: (418) 877-4054
E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.gddinstrumentation.com
t .. ,: ... . ', I:~. .
ELREC 6
MULTI CHANNEL IP/RESISTIVITY RECEIVER
Features
'. ... Six simultaneous dipoles ',. +> Twenty programmable chargeability windows > ~)< High accuracy and sensitivity
General
ELREC 6 is a six dipole Time Domain Induced Polarization/Resistivity Receiver designed for high productivity surveys in mineral and groundwater exploration
ELREC 6 has been designed for being both a user friendly and very sensitive IP/Resistivity receiver.
ELREC 6 is available in 2 models: the first option includes 20 programmable windows in Time Domain mode, the second provides both 10 programmable windows in Time Domain mode as well as the Frequency Domain mode.
Six dipoles
6 channels of the receiver permit to measure 6 dipoles simultaneously, which provides a high efficiency in the field.
Twenty programmable windows
Beside the classical preset logarithmic and arithmetic modes, ELREC 6 also offers up to 20 fully independent programmable windows which the operator can define by himself according to the way he wants to sample the IP
RES IP NC IP RES Line 1+00 N '00"1 "', '" -'" r'OOK , , I , , I Dipole-Dipo~kroy , . ~---.... , . , 1 , ...... . .. /~ ... ... . . ... ,
~ , .". - ........ - . -' . ,
0 no 0
'OOo~ , -----"------------- \. ,
~ 1000 oJ 0 . . .
La C?J ~ , T , I , ,
I , , , , , , 1 , . .. ........... ,
~ , , , , , , ,
0'" 25M
10J , ,
l ,a
, , , -30J ~-30 '"
, -30 -30 n - 1.2,3,4,5 ,6
"'*po;t
TOPOGRAPHY TOPOGRAP HY Profi l es N=1
RES ISTIVITY Q<I!!' ¥' Q<l!!E RESISTIV ITY (OHM-") ... " . .~, ,. I. I~ • ... (OHM-M)
logcri1hmic Contou 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5 , 10, .. ...
n-' no' n-2 n- 2
Instrum ents Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS # 108 n-3 n- 3 no. n-' Tx: TX- IJ GDD # 207 no' no' Generator: HONDA 200 0 W n:6 n:6
Field Work by Pierre Simoneau
INTERPRETATION CHARGEAB ILI TY ""'. ¥' "SOE CHARGEABI LI TY , ,
St(on~ increase in ,lP.( 0 .9> P > 0.7) (msec) ' .1 ••• I .' 1.1 7.1 I.' U " (rnsooc) - WI h ecreosed resistivity n_1 ... n- I n-2 n- 2 W.e~ d~fineQ jP.anamoz ( 0. 7 >P> 0.4 )
Wit ou resls IVlty deer ase. n- 3 n-3 no. no' = poor~ . d~fired.IP (0.4> P > 0.2) no' no' no r SIStivl Y signature.
n-6 n-6 IP-3 IP-2 SCALE 1 :2500
INTERPRETATION '7' INTERPRETATION Line 1+00 N
NORMALISED ""'. 00<Xl ~E NOR ~AL I SED , , CHARGEAB IL ITY . ~ .~ .~ •• • • . N • 2.7 CHARpEAB ILITY Golden Meadow Explor.
CN.C"",.58/SQRT(Res;') n_1 n- I CN=CH.g ! 58/SQRT{Resis)
n- 2 n-2 INDUCED POLARIZATION
Hemlo 1 Property n-' n- ' Bomby Township no. n-' no' no' Dote: 04/ 08/14 NTS.: 42C/ 12 n- ' n-6 Interprete by. P. Simoneau GeoI . Msc .
GEOSIG INC BOSO o ware or • 0 Cltmctls
• 4 RES IP NC NC IP RES I Line 1+50 N 100><, '0_ " 30 _30 r'OOK
I , , I
I I , , I I " ' . I Oipole-Oipo~ Pm:Jy I _-_ I \. j J L f I
.~._ . . ---. . ..-. ___ .-.:.,.. ......... .. .... ........ .. ' ,. ........ .. .. /0 I
I I . . . ' , < I I Q "' Q
I -- _______ " ________ -- ____ 'f... . Y "_
I
10001 OJ Q ." .... ... / .... a La ~1000 M ~ I _/ . I
I I , I I I , , ,
j J L f , , . . . . . . .. . .................... . , , , , , I I
, a'" 25M , , , , , , , ,
,oJ - 30.J - 30 - 30 L-30 LIO ' ' n - 1,2.3,4,5.6 -"",poi<
TOPOGRAPHY TOPOGRAPHY Prof il es N~l
RESISTIVITY '!j!! W '!'I"w "'fJl '!'I'" lip:! E RES ISTIVITY (00 .... ") ... 741t II. 1247 ,~ ,. ... el .. "" ,~
(OH .... ") ~.1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, "
"-, "-, "-2 "-2 "-, "-3
Instruments Rx: ELREC6 IRIS # 108
"-. "-. Tx: TX- II GOD # 207
"-5 "-5 Generator: HON DA 2000 W ""s n=6
Field Work by . Pierre Simoneau
INTERPRETATION CHARGEABILITY ""'. OtfDw "'fJl O1'E "'" , CHARGEABILITY , ,
Sjmn~ increase in.lP . ~ 0.9> P > 0.7) (m",,) ••• .. , ••• ••• ... I.' 1.1 " • " 1.1 (m",,) - WI ecreosed reslstlv ty "-, "-, "_2 "-2 w~~ defineQ IP.anamo~ ( 0.7 >P> 0.4 )
WI out resls IVlty deer ase. ",' ",' "-. "-, = poorly.d~fi!ed.IP (0.4> P> 0.2) "'5 ", 5 no reslstlvl Y signature,
"-s ", s IP-3 IP-2 SCALE 1 :2500
INTERPRETATION ISS' INTERPRETATION , Line 1+50 N
NORMALISED 1+pl W a.5O. "'fJl GtfDE "'" , NORMALISED , , C HARG EAB I LITY •• .m . ~ •• • • •• " ... 1.1 .~ CHARGEABILITY Golden Meadow Explor,
CN=CH09.58/SQRT(R ... ) "" ""
QI,I",CIitS .58,/9:lRT{Resis) INDUCED POLARIZATION
"'2 "'2 Hemlo 1 Property "_3 ",3 Bomby Township "'. "'. "'5 "'5 Dele: D4/~14 NTS. : 42C/12
"-s ",s Interpret by P. Simoneau Geol. Msc.
GEOSIG INC eoso o wore or • 0 clences
RES '00"1
I 1
1000i
IP 30,
I , , , , , 0 ' ,
I , , , , , I 1
lOJ - 30J
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIVITY (aH ..... M)
CHARGEABILITY (msec)
INTERPRETATION
NORMALISED CHARGEABILITY
NC 30 , , ,
. . , . ' ... ~ : . . .. :.,...:..:.....;..~:..:...:...:./....-.~-.. ~-. '''/. . ... : ..... - '" / ------------------""' .. ~ .
o - -- --- --- . . . . . . . \- .. : .. \ . /
. .. , : // ..,.. -30
"., ,., ,· 3 ,., ,., ,-,
,~. ~. ~. ~ u ., ,. u u u u u u
n-l 5.4 ,., "·3 " .. ,., ".,
IP-l I r:;=;=J
''l'' • .~ .10 .40 . ~ 1.1 .eo .50 .10
,-- ... ,
IP-2
O+f'O E a •
"
'.J ()II .. C~9. 58/SQRT(Resis) n-1
eoso 0 wore or e a
,., ,., ,., ,., ".,
CI8nces
NC 30
o
IP r 30 , , , , , I , 0 r I I I , I
RES ,'00' I r ~ 'ooo I r
-30 I
~-30 LlO
,., ,., ,·3 ,., ,., ,.,
,., ,., ,·3 ,., ,., ,.,
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIVITY (aH"-I.4)
CHARGEABILITY (msec)
INTERPRETATION
NORMALIS ED CHARG EAB ILITY
n-' CN-~.58"FRT(Re9is) ,., ,·3 ,., ,., ,.,
Line 2+50 N CApde-Dipole hroj o no o
a"" 25M
n - 1,2,3,4,5.6
Prof il es N=l
~.1, 1.5, 2 , 3, 5, 7. 5, 10, ..
Instruments Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS # 108 TX: TX- II GOD # 207
Generator: HONDA 2000 W
Field Work by . Pie r re Simoneau
-=
=
INTERPRETATION
SIr.onQ increose in ,1p. ( 0.9 > P > 0.7 ) With crecreosed resistiVity
W~II define4 /p.onomoly ( 0.7 >P> 0.4 ) without resls IVIty decrease.
Poorly.defined.IP (0.4> P > 0.2) no resistivity signature.
SCALE 1 :2500
Line 2+50 N
Golden Meadow Explor. INDUCED POLARIZATION
Hem 10 1 Property 80mby Township
Dote: 04/08/14 NTS. : 42C/12 Interpreted by: P. Simoneau Geo!. Msc.
GEOSIG INC
RES 100'1
1 1
lOaai
1
1 lOJ
TOPOGRAPHY
IP Ja, , , ,
1 , , a ' , , , ,
1 , , -30J
NC Ja
a
-30
.... -, ' I ' , . , ,
RESISTIVITY (OHM-M)
n _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ •• • _ • • _
CHARGEABILITY (msec)
INTERPRETATION
NORMALISED CHARG EAB ILITY
CN::CHt9.58/SCRf(Resis)
60S0 0 ware or e a
,., "., ".J "., "-, n=6
5.7 5.3 U 7.1 !t.3 B
n-l 5.7
"., ".J "-, "-, "-6
,., ".,
.110 .eo
7.' 1.3
7.t 7.' ' . ,
8 a.o
IP-1 I~ I I
•• I ... .,:
.50 .. \.1IO,_ ~ , 1'O ~,40
"-J .; I .. :t.. ... . ",, ___ •• I .eo \ :..~. .•
"c. " .11 .to "., ~ ... . 70 ,SO , ,-,
clences
OtfDE "'" , , U 7.7 l' 5.4 2.2
IP-2
,<00 , '''' , , , .40 .110 1.1 .IIC 25 U . 110 .40
-30
,-, ,., , . J ,., ,., ,-6
,., ,., ,., ,., ,., ,· 6
,., ,., ,.J , .. ,., ,. 6
IP .Ja ,
RES
rlOOK , , , , , ' a I-, , , , , ,
1
r 11000 r 1
~-30
r LlO
TOPOGRAPHY
RESIST IVITY (OHM-M)
CHARGEAB ILITY ("""")
INTERPRETATION
NORMALISED CHARGEABILITY
CN=CH,g. sa/SORT(R";,)
'1
Line 2+00 N Dipole-Dipole May o no
, , , , " '
o
.. /1 o:::25M , , , , 6
'... n =- 1 ,2,3,4,5,
Profiles N= 1
Logorittrric Cootws.1 . 1.5. 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ..
Instruments Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS # 108 TX: TX-II GDD # 207
Generator : HONDA 2000 W
Fie ld Work by Pierre Simoneau
-=
INTERPRETATION
Strang increase in IP [0.9> P> 0.7) WI h oecreased resistivity
W~II defineQ If. anamaly ( 0.7 >P> 0.4 ) without resistivity decrease.
Paorly.dlfined.IP (0.4> P > 0.2) no resistivity signature.
SCALE 1 :2500
Line 2+00 N
Golden Meadow Explor . INDUCED POLARIZATION
Hemlo 1 Property Bomby Township
Dote: 04/08/14 NlS.: 42C/12 Interpreted by: P. Simoneau Geol . Msc.
GEOSIG INC
RES ,p NC NC ,p RES Line 3+00 N lOOK..., '0, '0 '0 ,'0 r- 1OOK
I , ,. , I , ,. , Oipde-Oipole PrrCIj j , , ,
~ 1 .. .. .... . ..... . , I , . ------ , I a no a ,
- .;.=~---.:.---- ~~~--~~-----~------,
1000~ 0 ' 0 \ 0 ' 0 ~ 1000 ~ r!J , , ....
" I , ....... _;:" , I , , , , j , ,
~ ,
" V , ,
1 ' ..... , . . ... . ..... , , , I , , I
, , , 0:::< 25 M , , , ,
v ' , 10J -30..! ~-30 L 10
, .' n - , ,2,.3,4,5,6 -'0 -JO pbt """-
TOPOGRAPHY TOPOGRAPHY Profiles N = 1
RESIST IVITY '!j!1w l+~W I!j!1W '!'i!!w ¥' '!'i!! ' RESISTIV ITY (OHM-M) "" ... II~ ... ., ., "" "" .. ,m ~" " II. (OHM-M)
l.ogcriItTnC CroIDlzs.1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ..
"_1 ~7 1 4~r~/ge 4114 "-1
"-, "-, Instruments Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS # "-, 21.2/'" "-, 108
"-. "-. Tx : TX-I I GOD #207
"-5 "-5 Generator: HONDA 2000 W n=6 n=6
Field Work by Pierre Simoneau
INTERPRETATION CHARGEABILITY '!j!1' ''l'' • ,.00 • """ . 0700 0750 , CHARGEABIL ITY , , , ,
Sl[on~ increase in .lp. ~ 0.9 > P > 0.7 ) (m"",) u u u ,., 1.7 , .• .. , ••• , .. u ... ~ " (m,.,,) - WI h ecreased reslstl" ty
"-, u "-1
"-, ••• "-, Wff~ d!fineQ r anoma~ I 0.7 >P> 0.4 ) WI ou resls IVlty deer a e. "., ... "-,
" .. , .. "-. = Poorly.d~fined.lP (0 .4 > P > 0.2) "-, , "-, ne resistivity signature.
"E' "0' IP-1 IP-2 SCALE 1 :2500
INTERPRETATION ~. = IN TERPRETATION Line 3+00 N
NORMALISED ,..,w ''''' W ,..,. "'" . ¥' ~E NORMAL ISED , , , ,
CHARGEABILITY .~ .~ .. , .~ . " ... .~ .~ .90 '18 II GHARGEABIL ITY Golden Meadow Explor. CN=C~9. 58/SCRT(Resis) "-1 "- 1 CN~CH"'. 58/SCRT(R",.)
- - -'" ... -- - INDUCED POLARIZATION "-, .711 .10, .40 }fIJ "-, Hemlo 1 Property , ' "-, ,50 - _ .10 .XI/ I "-, Bomby Town ship , , , "-. .W ." .~ "-. ,
Date: G4/~13 NTS.: 42C/12 "-5 ... .~ , "-5
"E' "-. Interpret by: P. Simoneau Geol. Msc.
GEOSIG INC eoso o ware or • a clences
RES 100K,
I j I
1000~
I j I
IP '0_ , , , , , , , o. , , , , , , ,
NC JO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:.-.- .. /'\. / . . . --_ ........ . ........- .
NC '0
: : : : // _ .... _______ ~ ___ __ ... ..: .. / r --.- _______ :-.,;
o "'':'':':''; .:..:.;..: ~ ...... . • . " . 0
IP _'0 , , , , , , , ,0 , , , , , ,
RES r- 100K
I ~ I ~'OOO
f ,oJ -JO.J -'0 I -'0
, L. - 30 L,O
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIVI TY (OHM-M)
CHARGEABILI TY (msec)
INTERPRETATION
NORMAL ISED CHARGEABILITY
•. •. •. . .' ~ . . . ~ - -- - - .
n-' 1271 118'1 """:~
0- 2
0-' 0-' 0-' "=6
0-' 0-5
o-s
Hi"" '1'"
.110 ,Ill 1.1 1.1
3 ' .1 8.5 1
IP-l I$"S$'SS' I
. 110 2.1 1.1 .70
O4fOE U ' .1 •
IP- 2
• 70 1.2 • CN"'CHfg.58/SQRT(Resi9) n-'
eoso 0 ware or e a
0-2
0-' 0-' 0-5
o-s
cl~nces
0-' 0-' o-s
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIVITY (OHM-M)
CHARG EABILITY (msec)
,
INTER PRETA TlO N
NORMALI SED CHARG EABILITY
n-l CN=C!-+Io9. 58/SORT(Resis)
0-2
0-' 0-' 0-' o- S
Line 3+50 N Oipde--Dipole May o 00 o
, ' , " \", ~" o=25M , '
.... ' n - 1,2,3.4,5,6 ,..pai1t
Profiles N= 1
logaittrn. ~.1 , 1.5, 2 , 3, 5 , 7.5, 10, ..
Instruments Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS # 108 Tx: TX- II GDD # 207
Generator: HONDA 2000 W
Field Work by Pierre Simoneau
-=
INTERPRETATION
StronQ increose in,lP.( 0.9> P > 0.7) with <fecreased resistivity
W~II d~fine4IP' onomoly ( 0.7 >P> 0.4 ) without resls IVlty decrease.
Poorly.d~fined .lP (0.4> P > 0.2) no resistivity signature.
SCALE 1 : 2500
Line 3+50 N
Golden Meadow Explor . INDUCED POLARIZATION
Hemlo 1 Property Bomby Township
Date: 04/08/13 NTS.: 42C/12 Interpreted by: P. Simoneau Geel. Msc.
GEOSIG INC
RES 100K
1 1 1
1000~
IP 30, , , , , , ,
0 ' , , , , , , , 1
1 10J -JO~
TOPOGRAPH Y
RESIST IVITY (OHM-M)
CHARGEABIL ITY (m"",)
I NTERPRETATION
NORMAL ISED CHARGEABILITY
NC 30
o
-30
0-' 0-2
0-' 0-' 0- 5
n=6
0-' 0- 4
0- 5
0-'
CN=CHt9.58/SORT(Resis) n- '
0-' 0-' 0-5
0-'
.. ....... . ... . .. .. ..:....: . . .. .. ..,:...:..-, / . . . - --- .
L- . -- ----- -, ---........-:-- '----- . --- .. ' ,
, NC 30
: : : :'5{/ -----.- ----- . • ... . I '"
. . . . .. . . . , '- . " \ 0
IP r 30 , , , , , , ' 0 r , , , , , ,
RE1S
r'OOK 1
r 1'000 r 1
, , -30 L-30
r Lo
W _ 00 •• _ _ _ _ _ •
u u u u u u u u ~
••• •. ,
.70 .ao .110 .to
I.' 1.1
IP-1 ~
• 70 .eo
IP-2
"
0-'
0-2
0- 3
0-' 0- 5
n=6
0-' 0-3
0-' 0-5
0-'
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIVITY (OHM--M)
CHARGEAB I LITY i(msec)
INTERPRETAT ION
NORMALISED CHARiGEAB I LITY
n- ' CN=Cf#9I,58!SQRT(Resis)
0- 2
0- 3
0-' 0- 5
0-'
eoso 0 wore or e 0 clences
Line 4+10 N Dipole-Dipde hray a 00 a
, , , , " '
" // c =25M , , ' II' n - 1,2,.3,4,5,6
p rof2 s . N=~ 04 4 4
l1Jg<Yitt-rr<: ~_~. 1, 1.5, 2 , 3, 5, 7.5, 10, .. ~,~rs.
Instruments Rx : ELREC-6 IRIS # 108 Tx: TX - II GDD # 207
Generator: HONDA 2000 W
Fie ld Work by Pierre S imoneau
-=
=
INTERPRETATION
Strong increose in .IpJ 0.9 > P > 0.7 ) WI h Cfecreosed resistivity
W~II defineQ If .onomoly ( 0.7 >P> 0.4 ) without resls IVlty decreo~e.
Poorly.defined ,l P (0.4> P > 0.2) no resistivity signature,
SCALE 1 :2500
Line 4+10 N
Golden Meadow Explor . INDUCED POLATIZATION
Hemlo 1 Property Bomby Township
Dote: 04/06/13 NTS.: 42C/12 Interpreted by: P. Simoneau Geol. Msc.
GEOSIG INC
RES IP NC NC IP RES I Line 4+60 N '00., JO, JO :JO r JO r 100K
I , ,
I , , Dipole-Dipole Nroy j
, , f , ' ................ ,
I , 1-,' -.--- ,
I 0 no 0 -- -, . .. . .. . , -~--- . "--~-
, ooo~ 0 ' 0 0 ' 0 ~ ,ooo M r::!J , r
I , ,
I , , , , j
, , f
, , , ...... , , , , I
, , I
, , 0"" 25M , , , , , ,
,oJ -30...! -30 -30 !..-JO L,o ' ' n - 1,2,3,4,5.6 • ,..,at
TOPOGRAPHY TOPOGRAPHY Profiles N = 1
RESISTIVITY '!'I'!w "'I" ~ E RESIS~ IV ITY (OHM-M) '"'
.., "" ... "" .. ,
(0"'l-M) ~.1 , 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ..
"-, ,-, "-, "-,
Instruments Rx : ELREC-6 IRIS # "-3 ,-3 108
"-, ,-, Tx: TX-I I GDD # 207 "-5 ,-5 Generator: HONDA 2000 W n=6 , -6
Fie ld Work by Pierre Simoneau
INTERPRETATION C HARG EABI LITY "'" . 0000 """ E CHARGEABILITY , , ,
Stmn~ increose in.lP.( 0,9> P > 0.7) (m"",) l.t ••• ••• .., ••• ••• (m_) - WI h ecreased resistIVity ,-, ,-, ,-, ,-, w~~ defineQ IP.onomo~ I 0.7 >P> 0.4 )
WI out resistivity decr a e, ,-3 ,-3 ,-, ,-, = poor~.d!fir:d .l P (0.4> P > 0.2) ,-5 ,-5 110 r SlstlVI signature.
,-6 ,-6 IP-1 SCALE 1 :2500
INTERPRETATION - IN TERP 1 ETATIO N , , Line 4+60 N
NORMALISED ~. 0000 Ot?JE NORMALISED , CHARGEABILITY .~ .~ '.l .., .~ . ~ CHARGEABILITY Golden Meadow Explor .
CN:CH09 .58/SC1RT(R ... ) "-, ,-, CN=CH09.58/SCRT(ReSs)
"-, ,-, INDUCED POLARIZATION Hemlo 1 Property "-3 ,-3 80mby Township "-, ,-,
"-5 ,-5 Date: 04/~13 NTS.: 42C/12 "_6 "-6 Interpret by: P. Simoneau Geol. Msc.
GEOSIG INC e050 o wore or • a clences
RES lOOK ....
I j I
lOOOJ
I j I
,p ,,, , , , , , , o. , , , , , , ,
NC NC 30 30
--:~ -=:-:~~-::-:: a a
IP RES _30 ... .100K ,
I , , l , , I , , LlOOO cO , I , , l , , I , ,
lOJ -30.J -30 -30 L-JO LlO
TOPOGRAPHY
RESISTIV ITY Q>l!!w "'P' (aHM-")
.. , "" ... "" "" ", ' .. .., ... "" ",2 "" (r~~ "-3
"-, " ",5 ,
n:6
CHARGEABILITY Q>l!!W "'P' (msec)
.., '-' ... ... 7
"-, I. ;. /' U~7
"' 2 .~ . . "'3 s. u . U
"" .1 J.
"'5
"'S
IP-l INTERPRETATION Isssssl
NORMAL ISED CHARGEABILITY • SO .50 1.1
(}.J=CHt9.5B/SQRT(Resis) n .. 1
eoso 0 ware or e a
"" ",5
"'S
clences
", ' "'2
", 3
"" "'5 n=6
"'1
",' "-3
"" ", 5
"'S
TOPOGRAPHY
RESIST IVI TY (OHM""")
CHARGEABILITY (msec)
INTERPRETATION
NORMALISED CHARGEA81L1TY
",' CN=CH09.58/SQf(Resis)
",' "'5 ",S
Line 5+10 N Dipoe-Dipole kray 0 no 0
~ I!J , , , , , , , , , , c = 25 M , '"
, n - 1,2,3,4,5,6
pbtporl
~.1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ..
Instruments Rx: ELREC-6 IRIS #108 Tx: TX-II GDD # 207
Generator: HONDA 2000 W
Fie ld Work by : Pierre Simoneau
-=
=
INTERPRETATION
SIlang increase in .IP. ( 0.9 > P > 0.7 ) WI h 6ecreosed resistivity
Well defineQ If.onomoly (0.7 >P> 0.4) without resistIVity decrease.
Poorly.defined.IP (0.4> P > 0.2) no resistivity signature.
SCALE 1 :2500
Line 5+10 N
Golden Meadow Explor . INDUCED POLARIZATION
Hemlo 1 Property Bomby Township
Dote: 04/08/13 NTS.: 42C/12 Interpreted by: P. Simoneau Geol. Msc.
GEOSIG INC
300W 250W 200W 150W 100W 50W 0 50E 100E 150E 200E 250E z FT~--------~~--------~~--------~~~------~~~--------~~--------~r---------~~--------~~~--------~~--------~~--------~~------'m
g #4 g m z
z o L() L()
z o o L()
z o L() '<I-
z o o '<I-
z o Lf1 n
z o o n
z o L() N
z o o N
z o Lf1
z o o
z o L()
o
L N
#3
300W
+ +
+ +
+ +
L 410 N
+ +
N
'I,
L 250 N.j-
+ L
+
+
+
+
250W
+
+
HWY 17 +
+
200W
+
+
L N
+
L 1
L 1.iJD N
+
150W
+
L 510 N
--i r .
+
+
+
100W
L 560 N
L N
L 560 N
+ + +
-1
L 510 N
+ + •• j",
+
+
•
+ L 50 N +
+ + #2
50W
Sca le 1: 1500 o 25 50 75 100
(metres)
+ +
+ +
L 460 N
+ +
L 41 0 N
+ +
L 350 ~
+l300 N +
L N +
L 150 ~
L 100 ~ +
+ +
+ +
150E 200E
+
+
+
+
#1
+
+
+
-tL 200 N
+
+
+
+
250
U1 U1 o z
U1 o o z
-!>U1 o Z
-!>o o z
UJ U1 o z
UJ o o z
N U1 o Z
N o o Z
U1 o z
o o z
U1 o z
o
100000 80000 60000 40000
18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 9000 BOOO 7000 6000 5000 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000
900 BOO 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 70 40 10
Geophysica l L egend
Strong increase in IP with decreased resistivity ( 0.9 ) P ) 0.7 )
iSS S S S j We ll defined IP anomaly without resistivity decrease ( 0.7 > P > 0.4 )
, ... .... - .... .... ....
Tx= TX- II
Poo rl y defi ned IP ano mal y ( 0. 4 > P > 0.2 )
no res istivity signature
IP Axis
INSTRUM ENTS
no . 207 1400 W Rx = ELREC-6 no. GENERATOR= HONDA
by GDD 108 2000
Instrumentation (IRIS)
W
INDUCED POLARIZA TION SURVEY
Re sistiv ity A=25m N=12
MAP
PROJ ECT
·H emlo 1 Project FOR
Mead(Q)w Geosig
PROJ ECT Hemlo DATE
Executed by Pierre Simoneau, geol. 08 - 2004 -------------------T OWNSHI P Bomby
--~~----------
DIST RIC T
N. T .S.
Thunde r Bay, Ontario
42 C/12
Geomatic by Pierre Simoneau Donald Saindon 08-2004
Interpreted by Pierre Simoneau 08-2004
Mop no
Project no
6492
246 .01
300W 250W 200W 150W 100W 50W 0 50E 100E 150E 200E 250E zrr~------~~~------~~--------~~------~~~------~~--------~--------~~~------~~--------~~------~~~------~~------,m
8 #4 8 ~ z ~
z o l() l()
z o o l()
z o l() ~
z o o ~
z o l() n
z o o n
z o l() N
z o o N
z o l() ~
z o o ~
z o l()
o
L N
#3
300W
+ +
+ +
+ +
L 410 N
+ +
L 250 Nt-
+ L
+ + L 1
+ +
HWY 17 + +
+ +
250W 200W
+ +
L 510 N
+
L N
+
+ +
. ,
- " ','
L 1ljO N
+
+ +
150W 100W
L 560 N
, '" .,. "
+
+
" . IP-l
L N
50W
25 -
. . , I.' •
o
f'l c: Z f'l
•
2
Scale 1: 1500 25 50
(metres)
L 560 N
+ +
-1
L 510 N
+ +
! +
+
+ L 50 N +
+ +
50E 100E
75 100
~
N o f'l
+
+
L 460 N
+
L 410 N
+
L 350 I\lj--
+l 300 N
L . N
OJ'' ... ,
L 100 I\lj--
+
+
150E
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
-fl- 200 N
L 150 I\lj-- +
+ +
+ +
+ +
200E 250E
U1 U1 o z
U1 o o z
+> U1 o z
+> o o z
t-J U1 o Z
t-J o o Z
N U1 o Z
N o o Z
-U1 o z
-o o z
U1 o z
o
80,0 70.0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30.0 25.5
21. ° 16, 5 10.0 7.5 7,0 6,5 6,0 5.5 5,0 4 .5 4,0 3.5 3,0 2.5 2.3 2.2 2,1 I' 2 . 0 I,
1.8 1.7 1. 5 1. 4 1.3 1 . 1 1 ,0 0,8 0,7 0.6 0.4 ' 0,3 0.1 0.0
-2,0 --
Geophysical Lege nd
Strong increase in IP with decreased resistivity ( 0.9 ) P ) 0.7 )
IS S ss S1 We ll defined IP anomaly without resistivity decrease ( 0.7 > P > 0.4 )
Poorly defin ed IP anomaly - no resistivity sig nature ( 0.4 > P > 0.2 )
""".. ..... IP Ax is .... - ... .... ...
INSTRUMENTS
Tx:: TX- II no, 207 1400 W by GOD Instrumentation Rx:: ELREC-6 no , 108 (IRIS)
GENERATOR:: HONDA 2000 W
INDUCED POLAR IZA TION SURVEY MAP Norma lized
A=25m Chargeability
N=I 2. 304 PROJECT
HemIo 1 P:roject FOR
Meadow \ltl"L~ TV~ifBJY Geosig
CONSULTING-EXPERTS IN GEOPHYSICS
PROJECT Hemlo ~--------------
TOWNSHIP Bomby ----~------------
DISTR ICT
N,TS,
Thunder BaYI Ontario
42 C/12
DATE
Executed by Pierre Simoneou1 geoL 08 -2004
Geomatic by Pierre Simoneou Dona ld Soindon 08 -2004
Interpreted by Pierre Simoneau 08-2004
Mop no Project no
6494
246,01
4
", . ",.
w o If) N
w o o N
w o If)
w o o
w o If)
o
~ o If)
~ o o ~
~ o If) ~
~ o o N
~ o If) N
/
600N
/
BASELINE
z o <D
'" -'
550N
+
+
+
+ z o u:; -'
--0 C OJ en OJ
.---J
o u (J)
>-. -.e: DO OJ
('J
500N
+
+
+
+
z o ill v -'
TL 120
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
E , E
-<= o
(f)
a::
"0
"Q
"Q
"Q
Q
450N
+
+
+
~
u OJ 0>
E
[L
S2
~)
~ ::;: :;; o ~ ~ L o ~
U
~
• N
-;; E L o
Z
~
~ "" -----
u
'" "' o ..c: E
z u
g
""'
>,
"= > :;= <n <n (])
L
-0 ClJ V)
o ClJ L U ClJ
-0
-'= "= :3
CL
ClJ <n o ClJ L '-' ClJ
-0
>,
"= >
:;= V)
V)
ClJ L
-+:::J a
-'= "= :3
>,
o E a c
c::- 0
-q-r-
'" V)tSl CL •
tSl a
ClJ L :::J
-+o c:: en <n
>-, :-!:: > = <n <n ClJ L
a c::
>-,
<> E o C a
CL -N
-0 tSl ClJ c:: /'..
<n
X
CJ)
I:z w ::2 =:l a:: l(/)
:z ' ...... -- I I o I I I ,,-
/-....--..../ , ~ ~
o ClJ /'.. L
~ CL
-0 /'.. ClJ c:: CL
c;:: c;:: ClJCL
-0
<:t:
I{) ,
o -,-
Ng
:S £ :g ~
0> .~ ~ . L • c, 0:
<J
400N
+ .,.-
I{) ,
Q ,
==tl:::
.0-... / "
350N
+
/ ".". + / +"
/'..
en en co ~tSl
-+-(J) -
ClJ /'.. -0
r--
a; tSl
5-
/'..
>'", L OtSl o
CL _
I ~ ~ 300N
+
+
G.-
, , I \ \
250N
+
+
200lN
z
8 04
::f-
/ " ." /" 22
/ "" 3576 f ;; /" ~ , . " , \
/ z ."." ' / 0 '" 5.4 ' \
/ g ."." z 15201 ~·4 // z + 21- +"*- " I
/ ' 0 0 ---l ........... . I I . ~ "' " 'III
/ ~ n t ',, ' "b} / -' -' '''. 1 1823 l{J· ~ / . "' T "","- \ '/
+ + 25.Ej
"- -
"- " /' 28.7· 17.~
, , /
/ "- j/
5.8 C\2 6.0 ~ ).' 9.1 I.... / 93 2 ~ 676 _Q.6, 1 762 ".6) 5223 ((,q <.... / '+ ' l 'l "-+ ,...... / + . ~ : ~ : -I- , ~ "- ,/ ~
1/ ,, ' t--I 'I , I '-v~ '. . / 7. 8 - ·' -~ 51 6. 0' 54 dd 6 ~e \.390 ~ ,
32.2"~ ~ ~~ 1\
~ 5093 10" 6787 ~. 6665 ,.61 4437 ,' , SOlS rfir 1 ~88 7.6 / AUI "II:~ ~ -'I 'I " ,' \ e'l ,, /
,7 ' ! I I I I I I I , /' / : 'I " 1 ' " \ -, I . I
/ '" I 9.51 \ 8 .3 ' I 6.9. , 47 J B 0 J,~ / . 3206' . 489 , 1. ~ 5465 ' )0 I 866 ,0,6 ) 5757 ,,~.61 1346 "Olli '1 . I I ~ I 'I I I ; I , I I
/ " " " I , , '
c:: o
:;= a
-+co ClJ
E :::J
-i=(J)
~ rr: 5
o 0 o 0 <.:J CD 0
>-,
-= ON
« 500
o o
c:: :z o ::c
"'t.O , " urr: w O
I'--- rr: fo -.l « C\J w rr: w
" :z a x W c:: rr: <.:J
, X f-
" x f-
150N
+
21-o
"' -'
4.7. 15132 Iq· 3 I
" I
>-w > 0::: =:J (f)
:z: o I« N 0::: « ---.J o D-
o w U =:J o :z:
en en c:
0--
-+en o
(L
-0 c: o
en Q)
4-o L
(L
D... <I: :::;:
~
~ o ct,)
1\ Z
E l{) (\J 1\
«
01
~ o ~
It F'I\
Q ~
~
~
Q F""'='I
El ~
:t: lt.) W J o a:: [L
o
~ ~
I
~ ~
~
~ ~
F"Q ~ e,)
~ ~ e,)
~
~
g§ ~ l.i...
100N 50N o
+
+
21-o o
-'
TL 120 E
+
+
+
+
z o
'" -'
+
+
+
+
+
+
""'" '''.
/ .. I' I " '{ I I : / : I ' i\ . " \ . '\ J , I /; _ 0'1 ' 0 .4 1 8.7" 0 8'(1 ' 7. -, 6. 1.;- 1 1) . .. -1 6.~ - , 8. 1"" 1 . ~ // 3456,,1:1 3493 1: 6759 ~ : I 4881 " :! 5829 :8/ ____ 12985 ~.5 I 15750 ,~4 ) 15958 0:.4 / 13859 ~0 : 6 J //
:-l-l-~' ' I ' I '/ ' -- 1' 1 OJ I ' / , I : ' / / ~ " " , 0 "" /
. 3.9" 1 5 .5 'J 6.5 ' 9 1 ~ 6.81 , " 75 : I 5.9 ' / 6.8 ' / 6.31 ' / / "" 426 ~. 444 q'l 4307 ~.~ 1651 I' , 3671 f:? ~ 12414 0,6 / 474 ~.~ 724 ,,0~ 6 \ 4751 ~q /
'" · , , I I I ~ " . ' / ' \ ' , \ / " + .' ~ " t+ ", + , ", 0" C , T'"'I -, \ -, ./
z o '" '" -'
. , I I ' I ' I , "" ' / ' \ ' , \ / ". 4" i ~ J L ,,' 6 3. ,, ' ? 6.1 . , ' ) " 7 ' 1 5.- ~ 6. ,, ' \ 5. " /
" . 3661 0. 3336 O. 3110 ~'r 1065J .8 1029 .P ~7 ~ \ 9419 . ~.5 ) 9140 .0,.6 7152·
Q·6
/ z/
+
+
+
+
" . -' /_1 , ," ,,,' " / I , 0'
" '/ I, ~ I ~ 1-'-1 " / ' ~ , I /" '" -' /u ~ ~ I t--I '" ,, ' / " ./-' " " - , , I, ' , I ' / . . , , ", / '" 48 / 8 ~. "I'I. 1 2" 1 0 .6 <C 81 1'0 ' 7.7 ' 1'1 6. 1 ' ~ . 61 '9Id~ /
'" 239 -~ 6 '1 991 \ --.J 5704 :-, I 407 , ' \ 741 c, 2584 ' /' . '" / ' U' , 1,1 " d- + l,\+ I ,~ L, I L, /
z 'l." ' ~ , L I ' I , 1 • I / ~ . 4.2 1 -'~ 11 1.7 4. , ' 6.7 1 1 \ 9'1 ' , ./ "' ". 3204 ~. 09 ' . '-62 r1.0 7434 ~.5 J 7474 .6 6839 1.0 / -' TL 1-20 W ' ! ¥ " . TL 120 W
" I 'I :1 I .
" ~ , I Ii "/ ' I / "z ' , , I' ? ' / '", 3.7 b.b ' b .8 1 :o~.4 5 .• ~.61 / '2'" 277 " 107 642 ,,~ I / ~ . I, ' " . z -'~ + , ~ ,1 J\ -lil / 8-. ' I" " / ~
". 3 4 4 '1 5. 1 . ' \ 5 6 "l /-' " . 1271 '0.8 1198 ,~.2 5531 0.6 3076 ' O.~ ./ ". ,, " I / " ", . . I', ?
" ,~ ,,' I /:;s "." 4.9 i '\ 5.4 'd / ~
. 2694 0.\3 290 .~ / ' -' z " 'I . o , ' / ~ + " IH I / ~ . , .
-' ". 4 ·11 ./ ~ ~ OB /
. /
" ~
+
+ + + +
" z h ".0 / ~ llJ.. / -' -', / + " -I- / " z .
' " 0 / '" "' / " ~ ./
+ + + + + +
" z / '"", / ~. n /
+
r-----+ ---->-3: ::r::
+
+
+
+
a
u c
I---l
01 ...-I
(f)
o CD
CJ
'" '-' in >r a. 8 (!)
w o If)
N
w o o N
w o If)
w o o
w o If)
~ o If)
:;:: o o
:;:: o If)
:;:: o o N
~ o If) N
-," ==tl::: / ~~ " / ~ ~ g t t t t t t "0 t t t t t t g
N009 NOgg NOOg NOgt NOOt NOg£ NOO£ NOg?: NOD?: NOg L NOO L NOg 0
<t w 0 I- 0 <{ (\.j o ,
CO o -0 ~
=> o a.> c
'" E U5
a.> ~ ~ a.>
a::: >.
-D
" Q) -+
:::J U Q)
X W
o E Q)
:::c
fU W ~
o a:: 0.....
<t <t o 0 o 0 (\.j (\.j , , CO CO o 0
=> => o co 0 ~ 0 ~ co ~ co '" c '" E"o E
(J) V) US ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ co ~ ~ '" ~ 0: 0 0::::
>. -D
u -+o E o Q)
<.!)
o L o
-+c: o
o l1J
>. -D
" Q) -+-
Q)
L Q L Q)
-+c:
L N
>. Q) " -D " u E ~ o ~ N
l1J I- "
D:::c (f) z 3: o I-
IU a: I(f)
o
(f)
Iz
o o
'" r--
o 00 1O'"
'" 0", ON (/)
o
'" 04
~ w
1: ID
-5
o ())10 " <t to (\.j
o
o c
c -+u <l>
CL "O' o L
2 D...
,
300W 250W 200W 150W 100W 50W 0 50E 100E 150E 200E 250E zrr~------~~~------~~~------~~~------~~~------~~----------~--------~~--------~~~------~~~------~~--------~~------' m
g #4 g ~ z
~
z o L{) L{)
z o o L{)
z o L{) v
z o o v
z o L{) n
z o o n
z o L{) N
z o o N
z o L{) ~
z o o ~
z o L{)
o
L N
#3
300W
+ +
+ +
+ +
L 410 N
+ +
L 250 Nt
+ L
+ + L 150
+ +
HWY 17 + +
+ +
250W 200W
+ +
L 510 N
+ -< r .
L
+
+
i '0' I
. ,"
L lljD N
+
+
150W 100W
L 560 N
+
,"" ' , ' I .".
," ... ;;
1 ~ "'.' J
1-V-1
"" ~ , ','
L N
'--;
50W
25 - o
<J)
p Z r'l
•
2
Scale 1 :1500 25 50
(metres)
L 560 N
+
-1
+
+'
~-2
+ L 50 N
+
50E
75 100
+
L 510 N
+
+
+
+
+
100E
N o
'"
+
+
L 460 N
+
L 410 N
+
L 350 Nt
+L 300 N
L N
I, I",
" :
L 100 Nt
+
+
150E
+
+
+
+
#1
+
+
'"
L 150 Nt
+
+
+
200E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
fL 200 N
+
+
+
+
250E
U1 U1 o z
U1 o o z
.j>. U1 o z
.j>. o o z
GJ U1 o Z
GJ o o z
N U1 o Z
N o e z
~
U1 o Z
~
o o z
U1 o z
o
80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 15 . 0 14.0 13.0 12.0 11,0 10.0 . 9.0 B.O 7.0 6.0 5.B 5.6 5.4 .
5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4. 2 4 .0 . 3,7 3.5 3.2 2.B 2.5 . 2.1 1. B 1 . 4 1 . 1 0.7 0.4 0.0
- 2.0 .
Geophys ical Legend
Strong increase in IP with decreased resisti vity ( 0.9 > P > 0. 7 )
ISS S S S1 We ll defined IP anoma ly without resistivity dec rease ( 0.7 > P > 0.4 )
, .... .... - ... .... ...
Poor ly defined IP anomaly - no resistivity signature ( 0.4 > P > 0.2 )
IP Axis
INSTRUMENTS
Tx:: TX- II no, 207 1400 W by GDD Instrumentation Rx:: ELREC-6 no, 108 (IRIS) GENERA TOR:: HONDA 2000 W
INDUCED POLARIZA TION SURVEY MAP Chargeability 2.30444
A=25m N=I PROJ ECT
Hem!o 1 Project FOR
Meadow ~~s.mBIi~'!::" ,, __ ' ~~,~~ ,_ ,Jj-EJ I , ,~ I )
. ~LttlltJjli I." Geosig I nCe CONSULTING- EXPERTS IN' GEOPHYSICS
PROJ ECT Hemlo ----------------TOWNSHIP Bomby
----~------------
DISTRICT
N.T.S.
Thunder Boy, Ontario
42 C/12
DATE
Executed by Pierre Simoneou, geo !. 08-2004
Geomotic by Pierre Simoneau Donald Saindon 08-2004
Interpreted by Pierre Simoneau 08-2004
Map no
Projee! no 6493
246.01
June 18, 2004
Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd.
MAGNETOMETRIC SURVEY
HEMLO 1 PROPERTY
Humby Lake Area 42 C 13
Work Report
Pierre Simoneau, geol. M.Sc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... I
2. PROPERTY, LOCATION AND ACCESS .................................................................................. 1
3. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND CLAIMS ................................................................................. 1
4. PROPERTY GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 2
5. PREVIOUS WORK ..................................................................................................................... 2
6. FIELD WORK AND PROCEDURE ............................................................................................ 2
7. MAGNETOMETRIC SURVEY .................................................................................................. 2
7.1 Process of data and work .................................................................................................. 2
7.2 Presentation of the results ................................................................................................. 3
7.3 Interpretation of the magnetic survey ................................................................................ 3
8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 3
1. INTRODUCTION
At the request of Mr. Ray Skogsberg., from Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd, a magneto metric survey was carried on the Hemlo 1 Property to determine if there is any specific response in testing the extension of the Corona gold-bearing horizon. A grid was cut over the claim and the survey was done by Mike Melany. This report was made to interpret the magnetic survey.
2. PROPERTY, LOCATION AND ACCESS
The Hemlo 1 Property was accessed via the YelIow Brick Road 1 km east of Hemlo, approximately 330 km east of Thunder Bay, Ontario. The grid can be accessed by the drill road crossing the claim.
)J Nakina ~
<;:J
()LY:>o~ v Terrace Bay
o Superior loke
Figure 1: Location map of the property.
3. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND CLAIMS
One unpatented claim block, TB 3011091 make up the Hemlo 1 Property ( figure 2). The claims are owned by Ray Skogsberg (35%) and Kenneth Lambert (65%).
- 2-
4. PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The north-east portion of the claim block is underlain by a massive equigranular grey granite ( the Cedar Lake pluton) which contains magnetite. The other parts of the claim is underlain by metasedments, consisting predominantly of metasiltstones
5. PREVIOUS WORK
No known exploration work was conducted on the property prior to 1982.
1982 - Arctic Red Resources Corp. conducted geophysical, geochemical and geological surveys over the property.
1983 - Arctic Red Resources Corp. drilled one hole (DDH AR-1) to test the extension of the Corona gold-bearing horizon. The only interesting mineralization encountered in the hole was intersected between 1 833.6 and 1 834.1 m, in which a sericitic siliceous unit contained minor mo lybdenite mineralization.
6. FIELD WORK AND PROCEDURE
The work was contracted to Mike Melaney from MTEC of Murillo.
The grid extends in a SE-NW direction with NE-SW lines from 0+50N to 5+60N, with 50 m between each line. A base line intersects the grid at 0+00. Lines were cut for a total of 4.3 km.
The readings were talken with registration of the stations at each 5 m readings along all the lines including the Base Line (BL ) and the Tie Lines ( TL ).
7. MAGNETOMETRIC SURVEY
7.1 Process of data and work
The measurements for the magnetic total field were taken in a mobile mag mode with a one (4) second sampling readings and label readings taken each 5 meters.
A GSM-19 was used on the field. The magnetic readings have been automatically corrected for diurnal variations when the data was dumped.
7.2 Presentation of the results
Geophysical data was processed and presented on maps using the computer software program Geosoft. The maps were finalized by Paul Neilsen.
- 3 -
The magnetic results are presented on a profile map and a total field contour map at the metric scale of 1 : 1 500.
The property magnetic background is around 58 500 gammas with a maximum of 63464 gammas and a minimum of 54 808 gammas.
7.3 Interpretation of the magnetic survey
The high magnetic anomaly covering the northeast part of the claim block correspond to the Cedar Lake pluton that have a very high content of magnetite around the edge of the intrusion. (see figure 2 ).
The second magnetic anomaly is going along the baseline from the claim post No 2 and correspond to a granite dyke that crosses the road.
The third magnetic anomaly that follows the Tie Line 120W correspond to a series of metasediments containing hematite.
8. CONCLUSION and RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the geophysical survey on this mining property bring a satisfactory conclusion. Three (3) magnetic anomalies are located near the surface.
Some ofthe magnetic anomalies could give a weak IP response. This could be a result of the magnetite in the pluton or the hematite in the metasediments. In the old drill hole, a minor mineralized zone was seen at 1800 feet deep_ That wne could be at the surface too. An Induce Polarization (IP) survey could see such a zone near the surface and therefore an IP survey is recommended.
Highway 17
Figure 2. Interpretation Map.
o 50 100 150 200m ! ! ! ! I
Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd. Geology Interpretation Map
from Magnetic survey and drill hole
CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATIONS
2 !3v444 • I, Pierre Simoneau of 396 Brant Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, hereby certifY:
1. I am a graduate of University of Quebec at Chicoutimi (1987) with a Master degree in Earth Sciences M.Sc.
2. I have been employed as an exploration geologist and geophysicist on a full time basis since 1987, prior to that as a geological assistant for four field seasons.
3. I am presently employed as a project geophysicist and geologist with GBOSIG Inc. of 3700 Chaudiere Blvd., Sainte-Foy, Quebec, since 1991.
4. I own no direct, indirect or expect to receive any contingent interests in the subject properties or shares or securities of Golden Meadow Exploration Ltd .
5. I am a member of the Order of Geologists of Quebec (OGQ), a member of the (APQ) Association des Prospecteurs du Quebec, a member of the (NWOP A) Northwestern Ontario Prospector Association and a member of the CIM.
6. I have disclosed in this report all relevant material which, to the best of my knowledge, might have a bearing on the viability of the project and the recommendations presented.
Pierre Simoneau, M.Sc. geoL geoph.
Geosig Inc.
Dated at Thunder Bay, Ontario, this 19th day of June, 2004
CLAIM NUMBER: Unit Size: Townsh.i.p/Area: Lot Description: Staker: Recorded Holder: Recording Date: Due Date: Work Required: Total Applied: Work Performed: Total Reserve:
Mining Lands - Mining Claims Summary
TB 3011091 1 BOMBY (G-3173) \r\n SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD (1000152) SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD ( 35.00 %) 2003-Aug-26 2005-Aug-26 400 o o o
Present Work Assignment: 0 Cl.aim Bank: 0 Cl.aim Status:
CLAIM NUMBER: Unit Size: Township/Area: Lot Description: Staker: Recorded Hol.der: Recording Date: Due Date: Work Required: Total Appl.ied: Work Performed: Total. Reserve:
ACTIVE
TB 3011091 1 BOMBY (G-3173) \r\n SKOGSBERG, RAY DONALD (1000152) LAMBERT , l<ENNETH HENRY ( 65 • 00 %)
2003-Aug- 26 2005-Aug-26 400 o o o
Present Work Assignment: 0 Claim Bank: 0 Cl.aim Status: ACTIVE
© Copyright 2001 Queen's Printer for Ontario
This information is provided as a public service, but we cannot guarantee that the information is current or accurate. Readers should veritY the information before acting on it.
Appendix A
Claim Abstracts and Claim Map
~ , j -- _ ' ,_L ••••
-
• )"J" "f- - ,-
,~ f,'
-
,"""
,.1 ...
, ---_._---_ ... _--_ ... _----_.-- ----
•
• ---~
-
..... ·IJ
... - .. -_ .. - '-'''-'''-'''''---''''~ ....... ,_ .... _----,-,------
O NTA.<UO C ANADA
- -----== Mining Land T",,~ ..
'" TOWNSHIP I AREA BOIIBI'
AOM,"ISTRATIYE OIIilltICT8/ DI\II _ _
-.;_ _Il0l' ~~l\oogiIrJ~ THUNDERBIIY ~oI_._DIoOrIot W~W~
- -_ . • ---" --0 ...... -
-•
--
--@ _ .. _o .... _ ... ~ -_ ... til _ ... _-l:!1 ----... ["l --,---m _.-W ........ _-~ ---0 ---I:'I a
_. ___ w_ B ----
----_ ... -
""'- .-_ .. _----'- =~:::.-..::..-;;:-,.-.. , -... - _ ... _ ... _---... ,_ .... ____ ..... _ . ....... rw --..... - .--..... .. _ ........ _ ....... ""' .... _ .... _ .. _,-------_._--
2S()W 20('W is .-,--'t------------- ---+ C) (0
z u+-10 LO
7
6 +-lC)
z 0+ In rot)
Z D + o r>J
z ~; +-
7 () + 10
0+
30CW
+
+
+
" " " " " + L 20'a~
"
+-
+
HWY +
+
2SC]VV
"
+
+
+
I
" " " " " " +- L 150'N
+
17 +
+
200vV
" "
ISOW ,
+-
+
+
1 ,
" " " " L 'go N
+-
1 50\/1/
"
'OOW r,i1\N --.' .. J \ \ o 50F IOOF l~()L 2~JO[ , - ----- r- ---- ----'1----- ,--.. -------,-I-------T-----··
1
+ +-
+
, ,
, 1
"
#4 M
, I
+ t
L 560 N
+
/ T
I
, 1 I
/ I----'l~+___t---+---t---!---+I-i_I----+---1--+---!--- ~-,t---t--+- - + j j- ~ j
- / / " " r "
~ -" N o " / " / "" /
+- L '5~ +,-f---+---+---+-f---+--+---t---c '/-'-1/ ..,J.. 5 N
"" / " / " - / " / "" /
+- " / " -- "- +-
·OOW
+- +
+
~ 510 N
+
N o
/
+
+-
/
/ /
L 1'!iD N
/ /
+-
+
+-
+
+
+
UK/ .1 /~-I-----I---
v/ ( /
K-r-->r\--__ /
I 1
j. . t-- -+--+--
+-
+
. DUe
--j r ~
N o f'1
1 ,
100 ~
+
+
. I .. 1 ~)CI f-
L 150 ~
+
+
()()[
+
+
+-
+-
+
+-
-f1- 200 N
+-
+
+
.1
2'50E
en o o z
(~
en o z
-i' o o z
C.·J o o z
I",,) o o z
,.n C) Z
t::..)
o z
en o z
el : 1 2b 0 25 50 10n .. --
GOLDEN MEADOW EXPLORATION LTD. GROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
HEMLO PROPERTY PROFILED TOTAL FIELD DATA PROF l_E SC/\LEI em =1 OOCI nT
SURVEY BY: MTEC GEOPHYSICS INC. -~---~-__ - __ =-=============================_=_=--====.-=--=--=--'-'---"'--'==~__'_'__'__'_'__'__'_=~~~"___'__'_~_'_'___=~="____'__'__'_"_______'_'___'_=____"_"=~==_c.=.-=--=-=--.=_=====~==================='J
600N
W 0 + If) N
w gf-+ 0-
LL
:?Sf-+
w 8f-+
W~-L o I If)
o
s: o o
s: o If)
s: 81+ N
s: OL...L If) 0J
BASELINE
550N
+-
+-
+-
z 0 <D if]
+-598 r94 590 594-
, 615
z o <D If)
-"
+-
+-
+-
+-
SOON
+
+
+
z + 0
«)
-'
If)
-'
+
+
+
So o gt~ t t
N009 NOSS NOOS
z 0 <D ... ..J
TL 120
450N 400N 350N 300N 250N 200N I
z 0 0 N
+ + + + + i--.,-
:::J:I:::
0" / " / '0-. + +/ +" + +
/ "" / '
/ '" / " " / z "
/ 0 ",
/ 0 "z n "
+ // z +- T i-- "l /
0 0 I' ~ '" 631 "
/'" n 1918 " <q '" ..J ...... 0 "' _ 0"""", OX) '" _ m '" '" 0 ",.oJ. _ r-.. '" OX) 0 '" "'" "' '" 0 ONN~~NN~ro~vm~~~~m~~~~~ID~~~N~O~ n.nv~~~O~r~~~~~~~~
/':: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~~;:: g ~ :-! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ '7 ~~ ;: 12 ' , " 1856 71S 1137 965 3631 592 1264 809 2243 704 1432 459
1~ -351" 1334 " , 1353 ,
~"
"
150N 100N I
+
T o
'" ..J
I
+
+-
z o o
..J iW-l-IO'lf"'. ..... N<OV ..... ,... &1.i!~a;~~f.::~~g
796 TL 120 E
12tf-; 741f- 1939 + 382 966 557 2139 i 423 2283 "
988 1178 1468 1828 1932 ~46
875 968
876 524 2110 t 592 720 575 1247 939 689 588 709 .,.. 1152 651 605 777 143 I 649 629 681 t 1572 623 615 669 ' 1726 640 601 638 -'-1710 611 596 -947 6071- 58i- -2358
584 794 -3202 769 + -982 784 ' -125 701 .;.. 262 616 449
1800
109 100 147 147 273 239
'186 144
~;~~" " 781 " " 584 , 642 871
1119 1147 1268 871 1638 ,1610 -3292
-163b-- " -242 " 157 ,
50N I
+-
+-
+-
+-
z o If)
i--',T 1037
'-1-635
1628"
g
In r-..
o 00 101D
(l)
o "' (.) N
If)
o
ID N
0
+
~
if> e
" -S
+
+
+-
+
600 T 507
-23 74 355 500 503 524
984 " 897" 0-J
+ -'
+ +
593 590 595 600 594 588 592 585 588 580 578 579 579
590 568 ~~mNm~~~N~~~NW~_~WV
835 "" r-..::::j::j:::: ail> - '" <0 '" - OX) "'-...,. ~g,"'''"'-'''''''''O, mm--. " 1.0 CD tD I() II) I{)..- " ~~~~~~~~~~~~gw~~~~~ 77'>1 I I I I
586 1553 t 596 785 /, 547 .,- 548 i 603 725 ./ //' 552 ,-.,., . 546 T 61 I 720 /
~ V) t~ t~ ~ 560 0 549 684 677 / / ~~ ~ 636 ~ ~ 5~ ~6 ~ / 582 ~ I 577 545 626 /
584 0 1569 547 650 / 563 n 579 538 / 585 618 553 / 587 597 571 ~ 579 584 561 /'"'
~ ~ r'~ ~ /-' ~6 ~ ~ / 59 I <r: 586 665 . 612 -.J 578 554 / /
626 U ~583 595 / 626 590 662 _ ~ 6~/
:oil .. 0 N '" '" '" '" '" 1l!I-&- OX) ... '" ,... <0 co 0> 62.f ~ri!; f1l :g ~ ill :g iIl:1l Qal:g [0 :g ;:2 :£ is ~ sU2
, ·579 TL 120 W
601 612 597 597 601 599 598 602 604 589 586 583 582 583 586 592 584 589 586 582 577 577 586 620 586 581
n
1· 589 575 592 587 603 607 605 595 585 609 596 592 592 609
1587 I 575 . 574
t576 584
p81
1588 579 578 574
+
./ +-
z g.. ..J
+
+-
584 587
+
1'--+ ~
>-5: I
+-
+-
+
+
~1
~f
::::> Ct~
• C\l
l' p.--'-"
1~
w o o N
I, I o If)
w o o
W o If)
o
So o tD
s: o o
s: o tD
s: o o 0J
s: o If) 0J
So
t t t t Xl t t t t t t jg NOSt NOOt NOS[ NOO£ NOSZ NOOZ NOSl NOOl NOg 0
o ~ Z o ~ n::: o -.J (L
X w
3: o o L5 :::;!
z w o -.J o G
LJ > et: ~ => « U1 Cl et:~Cl wa::::..J t--w w wo..~ol.&.. Oa::::..J tJo..~ zoo (')..Jt-«::!:Cl ::!:WW OIlZ (f) => 0 o a.. et: (')
~
~(.) ~~
S:2 ~
'c a: g @ o ~ OCJ If) t) , , !.JJ ~ ~ 2 ~ C§ }.:
co
~ g§ V)
r------~ - .-~ - -.---
~,OOW ) =-) Cl I/,/ z ~----~~------r--' 01-+ + 0' cD , ,
6l+ In en
z 0 C) In
z c} c-)
-T
z o o 'Cj
-7
+
+
o + o "'"
L
o + u)
+
+
-t-
-+
+
+
200W '---'
+
+
+
+
L 410 N
+
+
HWY 17 z 0+ + + [n
0+ + +
'" L 150""
'" '"
150W ,
+
+
+
'" "-'" "-
L 1.qD N
+
/
'" "-
IODW , .. _---_.
+
L 560 N
+ /
/ /
/ /
L 510 N / /
/ 4--< / '/
/t:; / :;:
CLAIM
"-
, "j OOI/'i
5CiVv
+ -.~-----
#4 M
/ /
3011091
l
'~iOW
0 ~CF -T-- .-... ~ .. '--'-
t + rn 1> (!) r'l ,-z r'l
00 99 >; ~ +
0
100F l~CL ,
+ +
+ +
+
'" '" '" '"
300 N I /
/ /
/
\
150E
200E ,
+
+
+
+
'" '" ",+
'" '" '" V /
/
+/ /
/ /
/ /
/
+
L 150 Nt-
+
250E ,
+
+
+
+
+
#1
+
+
+
-tJ- 200 N
+
+
0) 0 0 Z
U1 : ... TI 0 z
U1 0 0 z
+ (jl 0 2
+ 0 ( )
L
I CJ 01
"0 ~
l~
I
L, 0 0 2
z
Ie:;; --< c) 12 I
o C) Z
GOLDEN MEADOW EXPLORATION LTD. GROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
HEMLO PROPERTY CONTOURED TOTAL FIELD DATA
-
,'::C',JTOUF; I~HERVAL SO, 200, 1 ',;00 n I :/tJ;t!E/Jv
SURVEY BY: MTEC GEOPHYSICS INC. " j
