of 23
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
1/23
LttQ /,
Q'f\\0 City of Troy
u ~
REVISED
NOTICE 1-23-20
15 TO
DD
COMMITTEE
TROY
CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL
100 S. MARKET STREET, TROY, OHIO
Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 5:00 P
Recreation Parks CommiHee
(Heath [Chm.],
Oda
Tremblay)
1 Provide a
recommendation to
Council
regarding
authorizing the Recreation Board
to enter
into
an
agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services
to
perform the feasibility study for a second
sheet
of
ice at Hobart Arena at a cost not
to
exceed 50,000.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015, 6:00
P
Community Economic Development CommiHee
Twiss
[Chm.], Kendall, Schweser)
1. Provide a
recommendation
to Council regarding
Ordinance
No. 0-1-2015, the rezoning of 40
parcels (former Hobart
Bros./ITW
factory site and parking lots) from M-2, Light Industrial District, to
OC- 1, Office Commercial District.
Other Committees/items may
be added.
1-21-2015
Rev. 1-23-2015
cc:
Council
Mayor
Mr. Titterington
Mr. Livingston
Mr. Stickel
Department
Heads
Chamber of
Commerce
Bd of
Education
media
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
2/23
RECRE TION
P RKS
COMMITTEE
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
3/23
~ t Q / ,
Qb\
City
of Troy
u ~
TO:
Mrs. Baker, President of Council
MEMORANDUM
Patrick E. J Titterington
-
...
100 S. Market Street
P. 0 Box 3003
Troy
, Ohio 45373
www
.
troyohio gov
phone:
937)
335-1725
fax:
937)
339-8601
patri ck. i ttering on @troyohio.
gov
FROM: Patrick E.
J.
Titterington, Director of Public Service and Safety
DATE: January
23,
2015
SUBJECT:
UTHORIZING GREEMENT WITH CROSSRO DS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
FE SIBILITY STUDY FOR SECOND SHEET OF I E FOR HOB RT REN
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Recreation Board
be
authorized to enter into a professional services agreement with Crossroads
Consulting Services of Tampa, Florida to perform a Feasibility Study related to a second sheet of ice at the Hobart
Arena at a cost not to exceed $50,000.
BACKGROUND:
The July 28, 2014, report of the Committee of the Whole regarding the Riverfront Development Project, included
the recommendation of:
While not a matter of legislation, based on the interest in the stand-alone second sheet of ice option,
several members of Council asked that the 2015 budget include funds related to a feasibility study and a
study of the economic impact such a facility could bring to the Troy community, as well as exploring funding
partnerships.
$50,000 was included
in
the 2015 Hobart Arena Budget for that feasibility study. The Recreation Director has
recommended that the firm of Crossroads Consulting Services of Tampa, Florida be authorized to perform the
feasibility study. This
is
the firm that Council authorized to perform the Hobart Arena Study at the end of 2013 and,
as a part of the study, already has some information relating to a second sheet of ice. At the January 21 meeting of
the Recreation Board, the Board supported the recommendation of the Recreation Director and approved a motion
that the Recreation Board recommends that Troy City Council authorize the Board to enter into a professional
services agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services to perform a feasibility study related to a second sheet of
ice at a cost not to exceed $50,000. The scope of services will include a market demand analysis, profile an
inventory of ice rinks
in
the region, survey user groups and develop
an
estimate of usage, assess operating
impact, develop a financial pro forma and cost benefit analysis, and develop a conceptual design and cost analysis.
The feasibility study does not provide a final design or cost estimates based
on
that design. The estimated time
frame to perform the feasibility study
is
about four months.
REQUESTED ACTION:
It would be appreciated if you would assign to a Committee of Council considering legislation authorizing the
Recreation Board to enter into an agreement with Crossroads Consulting Services to perform the feasibility study
for a second sheet of ice at Hobart Arena at a cost not to exceed $50,000.
Cc: Mayor Beamish
K.
Siler
Recreation Board
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
4/23
COMMUNITY
E ONOMI
DEVELOPMENT
OMMITTEE
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
5/23
1st rd
CITY
OF
TROY, OHIO
ORDINANCE No _=
--=--1-=20.:..::: 15
- ===O=R=DI=N=A=NCE
CHANGING THE ZONING OF FORTY (40)
I
PARCELS
IN
THE CITY OF TROY, OHIO FROM M-2,
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
I
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO OC-1, OFFICE-
I
WHEREAS, a request for zoning change was presented to the Planning
Commission
of
the City
of
Troy, Ohio, to rezone forty (40) parcels in the City
of
Troy,
abutting
N.
Elm Street, W. Water Street, W. Main Street, and
N.
Adams Street at the
site
of
the former Hobart Brothers factory and parking lots, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City
of
Troy, Ohio, has reviewed
the plan and recommended approval, and
WHEREAS, at least thirty days notice of the public hearing
of
said change has
been provided in a newspaper
of
general circulation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council
of
the City
of
Troy,
Oh
io
as follows:
SECTION 1: That the zoning be changed from M-2. Light Industrial District to
OC-
1
Office Commercial District, for the forty (40) parcels
of
real estate abutting
N.
Elm
Street,
W.
Water Street, W. Main Street, and
N.
Adams Street at the site
of
the former
Hobart Brothers factory and parking lots as shown on the Exhibit A attached hereto.
SECTION II: That this Ordinance shall be effective at the earliest date allowed by
law:
Adopted:.
_________
President
of
Council
Approved:_________
At test :
Clerk
of
Council
Mayor
j
i
i
---
---- --
-
-.
---
____/
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
6/23
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
7/23
.
. .
t Q / ,
Qt\\ City of Troy
u ~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mrs. Baker, President, Troy City Council
Sue Knight, for the Troy Planning Commission
December 11, 2014
REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REZONING
APPLICATION-
600
WEST
MAIN
STREET (40 PARCELS TOTAL) FROM TO M-2 LIGHT-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO OC-1, OFFICE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; THE AREA
PROPOSED
TO BE REZONED CONSISTS OF TEN
PARCELS
LOCATED ALONG NORTH ELM STREET (BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET
AND WEST
WATER
STREET ,
FIVE
PARCELS
LOCATED ALONG
THE
INTERSECTION OF WEST WATER
STREET
AND
ADAMS
STREET,
AND 25 PARCELS THAT ENCOMPASS THE 600 WEST
MAIN
STREET LOCATION.
On December 10, 2014, the Troy Planning Commission considered the rezoning of 40 parcels that make up the
former ITW/Hobart Brothers site,
with
the general address of 600 West Main Street, from the zoning
of
M-2, Light
Industrial District, to the zoning
of
OC-1, Office-Commercial District. The owner of the property
is
the Hobart
Brothers Company; the City of Troy is the applicant.
Ten parcels are located along North Elm Street (between Washington Street and West Water Street), five parcels
are located along the intersection of West Water Street and Adams Street,
and 25
parcels encompass the 600
West Main Street location.
The Commission had received a report of City staff, which was reviewed as part
of the
meeting discussion. A
copy
of
the packet provided
to
the Commission is attached.
It was commented at the meeting that the City reached out to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that
will complement the commercial district and respect the nearby residential uses. Staff reviewed with the
Commission that the proposed OC-lOffice-Commercial District zoning will
fit
best into this mixed use area, as OC-
1 zoning is designed to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting of groupings of
professional type uses, and the district is designed and intended
to
act
as
a buffer and is intended
to be
mapped
along major thoroughfares as a transitional area between nonresidential and residential uses. The OC-1 zoning
does not permit residential development in this district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second
story or above. Further, the OC-1 district limits commercial uses that are envisioned
to
prevent disruption to the
surrounding existing residential neighborhoods and the
OC-1
zoning will protect the surrounding residences from
the more intensive uses that are currently allowed in the M-2 zoning district. The Comprehensive Plan s Future
Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows this area
as
it
currently is (industrial) and the surrounding land uses to remain the
same, as a mix
of
commercial, government, residential and recreational
uses.
Retaining the industrial zoning does
not fit well
with
the adjoining mix of uses. Staff advised the Commission
of
the staff opinion
that
adjoining
properties will benefit from the positive impact
of
the proposed
OC-1
zoning as
it
permits the greatest flexibility
to the reuse
of
the property while complementing the existing commercial uses and protecting the surrounding
residential zoning districts. The owner concurs with the rezoning
to
OC-1.
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
8/23
MEMO
PAGE TWO
The Planning Commission determined
not to
hold a public hearing on this rezoning application.
By
unanimous vote, the Troy Planning Commission recommends to Troy City Council
th t
the rezoning request
identified as 600 West Main Street (40 parcels total) from to M-2, Light-Industrial District,
to
OC-1 Office
Commercial District,
be
approved, based on the findings
of
staff that:
The proposed rezoning
is
consistent
with
the Zoning Code s intent
to
separate incompatible land
uses;
The proposed rezoning will C
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
9/23
TO: Troy Planning Commission
FROM:
Planning staff
.
DATE: Decem
.
ber 1 _.2014.
SUBJECT:
Rezoning: 600 West Main Street Surrounding Properties
OWNER: Hobart Brothers Company
APPLICANT: City
of
Troy
BACKGROUND
The City of Troy has applied, on behalf of Hobart Brothers Company, for Planning
Commission to consider the rezoning of 40 parcels from the M-2 Light-Industrial District
to the OC-1 Office-Commercial District. A list
of
the parcels, as well as, a map
highlighting the parcels of the proposed rezoning has been attached to this report.
The area
of
the rezoning is broken into 10 parcels located along North Elm Street
(between Washington Street and West Water Street), five parcels along the intersection
of West Water Street and Adams Street, and 25 parcels that encompass the 600 West
Main Street location.
The surrounding zoning districts include B-2 General Business District to the south, a
mixture of B-2 General Business District and R-7 Multi-Family to the east, R-6 Two
Family Residential to the west, and M-2 Light-Industrial to the north.
DISCUSSION
The razing of the old Hobart Brothers building has left an opportunity for redevelopment
in the heart of our community. This area was once dominated by industrial uses but has
since grown into a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The City has reached out
to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that will complement the commercial
district and respect the nearby residential uses. A rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial
district to the OC-1 Office-Commercial district will fit harmoniously into this mixed use
area.
The Zoning Code describes the OC-1 Office-Commercial district as designed to
accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting of groupings
of
professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic and
similar uses. This district is designed and intended to act as a buffer and is intended
to
be mapped along major thoroughfares as a transitional area between nonresidential and
residential uses. The OC-1 district does not permit residential development in this
district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second story or above.
The OC-1 district limits commercial uses that are envisioned to prevent disruption to the
surrounding existing residential neighborhoods and the rezoning will protect the
surrounding residences from the more intensive uses that are currently allowed in
theM
2 zoning district. Attached to this report are the permitted uses
s
described by the OC-1
zoning district and the M-2 zoning district
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
10/23
The Comprehensive Plan s Future Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows this area as it currently
is (industrial) and the surrounding land uses to remain the same,
as a mix of commercial,
government, residential and recreational uses. The industrial use does not fit well with
the adjoining mix ofuses.
t
is staffs opinion that adjoining properties will benefit from the positive impact of the
proposed rezoning. The proposed OC 1 district permits the greatest flexibility to the
reuse
of
the property while complementing the existing commercial uses and protecting
the surrounding residential zoning districts.
n reviewing a rezoning proposal, Section 1139.07 outlines the criteria on which to
base decisions:
A)
Whether the change in classification would be consistent with the intent nd purpose
of
his Zoning Code.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with Zoning Code. As described in the Zoning
Code, the purpose
of
the OC-1 District is to accommodate a mixture
of
office and
commercial uses and is designed and intended to act as a buffet. The OC-1 district is
intended to be mapped between nonresidential and residential uses.
B)
Whether the
proposed
amendment is made necessary because
of
changed or changing
conditions in the area affected, and,
i
o, the nature
o
uch changed or changing
conditions.
The proposed amendment is a result of the razing of the former Hobart Brother s building
which was used to house an industrial use. This provides an opportunity for
redevelopment in the downtown area
to
can promote commercial use but also respect the
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
C) Whether the uses that would be permitted on the property
i
t were reclassified
would
be
compatible with the uses permitted on other property in the immediate vicinity.
Commercial uses would be permitted on this property and is permitted on surrounding
commercial properties already in existence. The intent is to eliminate the intrusive
industrial uses and create a buffer for the adjoining commercial residential zoning
districts.
D) Whether adequate utility, sewer,
nd
water facilities,
nd ll
other needed public
services exist
or
can
be provided
to serve the uses that
would
be permitted on a property
i
t were reclassified.
All utilities are provided.
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
11/23
E) The amount
of
vacant land that currently has the same zoning classification as is
proposed or the subject property, particularly in the vicinity of he subject property, and
any special circumstances, in any, that make a substantial p rt of uch vacant land
unavailable for development.
In
the vicinity o the subject property, there is no available vacant land with the
OC 1
zoning classification.
F) Whether the proposed amendment would correct an error in the application of his
Zoning Code as applied t
the subject property.
Not applicable in this request.
PUBLIC HEARING
Due to the straight forward nature o the rezoning request and the fact that City Council is
required to hold a public hearing i the request proceeds on, staff does not feel that a
public hearing before the Planning Commission is warranted.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval o the
rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial Zoning district to the OC-1 Office-Commercial
district, based on the following:
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Zoning Code s intent to separate
incompatible land uses; and
o The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts
and provide flexibility for future development; and
o The OC-1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial
zoning district to the surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
12/23
Scheduled Planning Commission Meeting
(Held every 2nd and 4th Wednesday
of
the month at
3:30p
.m.)
Office Use Only
Date Filed
Date Requested:
Applicant(s) scheduled on the agenda will be notified
Accepted
by
Filing Fee Pd.
Receipt#
APPLICATION IS DUE TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO MEETING
APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENT
CITY OF TROY PLANNING COMMISSION
(MUST BE
lYPED
OR PRINTED LEGIBLY
IN
BLACK INK)
:
r
(READ SECTION 1139 OF THE ZONING CODE E F O ~ E COMPI,.ETING AP-PliCATION)
.
. .
'
.
.
An application for an amendment to the City of Troy, Ohio
o ~ i r i g
Code
t h ~ f
would .
i a r i ~ e
the. h i ~ g c i a ~ s l f i c a t i o n for
the property located at ~ J j
N.
(l' Bin 1/fetl .} iMVll'f (fk f ct/r .. . i. . . ..
( treet Address)
being lot number(s)
qo ff iiA } ro tt
from
(IJ- 1
to
0,-l
(P'rceldentincat ion Number) ( E x i s t t n g Z o n ~ Classification) ( P r o p o s ~ oning Classification).
OWNER
Name
~ i k i - - - l o l ' b J ~ , ' - 4 1 - - k - - - : f 1 . . : . . . . 1 1 J r a ~ ~ f . . t , ' l l - ; r - - f - J ~ ~ ~ ~ F P i l - ' i ~ ~ . L - r -
Address - w - ~ - \ l - ' ( ) 1 1 _ _ . l r i ~ ' - ~ - - - ' f V l ~ { ) I ( U . , ~ ~'--4;J,_._-.;._
r.IF
City
State = = C ~ l . . : . . . . & < ~ J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~
Zip Code _ Y ~ - ~ - 7 - ' - ' 3 ' 7
PhoneNo.
Fax No.
The applicant is the
/JJJhctiMtl
/lc pnj.
State th:: ' it tkSiof
the applicant)
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLL
OW
ING:
APPLICANT
Name
_ _ _ . . { t ~ ' ~ J y _ . . . . , G ~ 1 f - - - - . L . l o . f t U z , _ _ , _ V
Address _ _ _ _ . _ . } ( 1 ~ ( , _ _ 1
J ~ . _ [ V ) ~ l l . : . . . . . : l o o r ( R " ' - Q . . . ~ - - - ' - J .
C.IL..-h
City
- ~ . . r 4 1 U f r ~ - - - - - - - - -
State
____..a4-'u
Zip Code
- - - L ~ . L . . . : l p ~ 1 ; - 7 i ~ - - - - - -
Phone No. _ _ _ _ . . 3 : : . . . _ z c . . _ ~ 9'--' = - - - 7 ~ ~ 8 : : . _ . . _ 1
Fax No.
_:J.......:....r__ _ , _ ~ f ? . - "q ....f-1------
of
the property, which is subject to this application.
1. The reasons for seeking a change in the zoning classification or zoning text: Attach as EXHIBIT A.
2.
The legal description of land proposed to be reclassified: Attach as EXHIBIT B ..
3. A site plan prepared by a registered engineer, surveyor or architect
in
duplicate drawn to such scale as to clearly
show:
a. The actual dimensions of the subject property according to the recorded plat of such property, lot
numbers, it's present zoning classification, existing and proposed uses: Attach as EXHIBIT
C .
b. The present zoning classification of all surrounding lands located within two hundred and fifty (250) feet
of the land proposed to be reclassified: Attach as EXHIBIT
D
..
c.
A list (see example)
of
the names, addresses, and lot numbers
of
the owners
of
property within a radius
of two hundred and fifty (250) feet from the parcel or parcels of land proposed to be reclassified:
Attach as EXHIBIT E
.
i.
Include one (1) copy
of
County Tax Maps
ii.
Include two (2) sets
of
mailing labels
4. 2 complete sets (Exhibits A-E) reproducible in a format no larger than
11
x17
5. Filing Fee
of
$150.00 made payable to the City of Troy
Page 1 of 2
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
13/23
I HEREBY
DEPOSE
AND SAY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND
THE
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN A
Tf iE EXHIBITS
PREPARED
BY ME AND TRANSMITTED H E R E _ W _ I T H 0 A i ~ r E ~ ~
_ R U . . . . . = ; i 2 1 = . : ~ -
~ ~ - - - - - - - -
L (Applicant Signatu
Subscribed and sworn to before me this j - day ~ C . 8 & , 8 , 20J :f:_
My Commission E x p i r e s ~ - f ~ . , J . . J
S
2 -D Z
,
1
1 , ,
(Month/Date/Year)
Pu
\ j ' ~ @ JAMES A. DANDO Notary Public
d
J
~ ~ ~ ~ \ * ~
lnandfortheStateofOhio
~ - 1 _ , _ _ - = : . .
....
- - . : : . . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - -
EMy
Commission
Expires Apr. 17 2017 (Notary Publ
Recorded in Miami County
{For Office Use
Only
Do Not Write Below This Line)
REQUIRED DOCUMENTS:
EXHIBIT A Reasons
for
Zoning Reclassification
-+-- - -
EXHIBIT B Legal Description
-+-- - -
EXHIBIT C Site Plan: lot dimensions, lot numbers, current zoning, exist ing and proposed uses
-+-- - -
EXHIBIT D Site Map with Zoning & Owners within 250 feet of parcel
EXHIBIT E Property Owners List within 250 feet of parcel
-+-- - -
Labels Two (2) Sets of Mailing Labels of Property Owners
Copies Fifteen (15) Complete Sets in a reproducible format 11 x17
Map(s) One (1) County Tax Map(s)
Filing Fee Check issued to City of Troy for 150.00
- + - - - : - - : - : : : - - . - - ~
Additional
Documentation
{List):
PLANNING COMMISSION DISPOSITION:
1
PUBLIC HEARING DATE
1
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL DISPOSITION:
1st Reading:
2 d:
3rd:
PUBLIC HEARING DATE
COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
Approved:
Denied: CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Ordinance Number:
Effective
Date:
Revised 10/25/11
Page 2 of 2
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
14/23
i i t i ~ 6 ~ o
l
f
d Pa trick E. J.
il f
le
il
hglon _
~ r ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
;
j
, D ir
ector of
Public S
ervice
Safety
il
1
00
S.
Mark
et Street, P.
0
Box 3003
~ t U J n .
Troy,
Ohio
45373-7303
:S.:?;::J c.;
::: p h
one:
(937) 335-1725/fax: (937) 339-860 I
t i t t e r i n g t o n t r o y o h i o g o v
November 25,2014
Mr. Rodney L. Jones
Director
of
Real Estate and Controller
lllinois Tool Works, Inc.
3600
West Lake Avenue
Glenview, IL
60026-1215
Dear Mr. Jones:
To follow up with our conversation last week, the City ofTroy is interested in initiating the rezoning of he
parcels that collectively make
up
the site
of
the former Dlinois Tool Works ITW)/Hobart Brothers
manufacturing facility at 600 West Main Street. Those
31
parcels a map
of
which is attached hereto) are
currently zoned
M 2
Light Industrial District, which as you know is not compatible
with
the surrowuiing
properties and uses. The City desires to rezone those parcels to OC-1 Office Commercial District,
which
would allow compatible uses, as evidenced
y
the list ofPrincipal Permitted Uses that is also attached.
I am requesting your signature below to demonstrate that ITW does not object to the City rezoning those
parcels. Please note that the rezoning process will be completed y the City ofTroy at no cost to ITW.
Sincerely,
Patrick E.
J.
Titterington
Director ofPublic Service and Safety
Illinois Tool Works does not object
t
the City of Troy Ohio initiating t its
sole cost the rezoning
of
he properties identified on the attached map.
attachments
cc:
Michael
L.
Beamish, Mayor
Jim Livingston, Law Director
Jim Dando, Development Director
J.C. Wallace, CEO/President, Troy Development Council
ate
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
15/23
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
16/23
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
17/23
Exhibit A
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
18/23
OC-1 Principal Permitted Uses
Accountant s office.
Adult Family Home.
Apparel stores - retail sales.
Architect s office.
Art galleries and museums.
Artist, sculptor and composer studios.
Attorney s office.
Automobile parking garages.
Automobile parking lots.
Banks and financial institutions.
Barber and beauty shops.
Bed and breakfast.
Business, civic, fraternal association and labor meeting rooms .
Business and technical schools.
Day-care centers.
Drug stores - retail sales.
Engineer s office.
Family Home
Florists.
Food stores - retail sales.
Foster Family Home.
Gift shops.
Government buildings, structures,
or
premises
Health studios and clubs.
Insurance agent s office.
Jewelry- retail sales.
Libraries.
Medical and dental laboratories.
Medical and dental office/clinic.
Mortuaries and funeral parlors.
Newsstand
retail sales.
Nursing homes.
Photo studios.
Private clubs.
Professional Offices not otherwise mentioned.
Public parks, playgrounds and community centers.
Public utility.
Real estate broker s office.
Residential use on second story or above.
Retail and service uses.
Schools
primary, intermediate and
secondary
publ ic or private.
Seamstress and tailor.
Veterinary office -
o
boarding.
M-2
Principal
Permitted Uses
Agricultural implement sales and service.
Agricultural uses.
Auction sales.
Automobile fuel dispensing station.
Automobile parking garages.
Automobile parking lots.
Automobile repair garages - including body work.
Bakeries - wholesale sales.
Beverage distributors and bottling plants.
Printing, publishing, binding and typesetting
plants.
Private clubs.
Public utility.
Railroad stations, depots, train yards,
classification yards and team tracks.
Research and engineering laboratories.
Sales offices and service centers.
Sawing and planning mills.
Sexually oriented business.
Sign painting and manufacture.
Bone, canvas, cellophane, clay, cloth, cork, feathers, felt - Stone products processing and manufacturing.
manufacturing , assembling, compounding,
or
treatment (or any
Building material sales and storage facilities .
Carpentry shops.
Cash advance businesses.
Cement block and formed products manufacturing.
Cold storage plants.
Commercial greenhouses and nurseries.
Contractor sales, storage and equipment yards .
Crematoriums (pet and human).
Dairy and food product processing and packaging .
Driver training schools (trucks).
Dry cleaning - commercial.
Electrical and electronic products, components and equipment -
manufacturing, assemblinp; or repair.
Equipment rental services, including cars, trucks and trailers .
Exterminating services.
Fiber, fur, glass, hair, hom, leather, paper, plastics, rubber, precious or
semi-precious stone or metal, sheet metal, shell, textiles , tobacco, wax,
Food brokers - retail, wholesale and storage without processing.
Frozen food lockers.
Garden stores.
Government buildings, structures, or premises used exclusively be
federal, state, county, township,
or
municipal p;ovemments for public
Government buildings, structures, or premises used exclusively by
federal. state, county. township or municipal governments for public
Heating, A/C, electric and plumbing sales, service and repair.
Liquid fuel, petroleum products, petroleum, and volatile oils - bulk
storage stations in accordance with Section 1143.18(g) hereof.
Machine shops, tool and die shops.
Machinery and heavy equipment rental, sales and storage.
Manufacturing, assembling or repair of medical, dental, optical and
similar precision instruments
or
appliances .
Meat processing and packaging, exclusive of slaughtering.
Medical and dental laboratories.
Metal products, excluding structural steel and foundry products or
product from previously prepared materials manufacturing,
Moving and storage companies.
Musical instruments - manufacturing, assembling or repair.
Novelties, toys and rubber products - manufacturing, assembling or
repair.
Pawn shops.
Pharmaceutical products, including cosmetics, toiletries and perfumes,
but excluding the manufacture of soap from raw materials or products
Pool Halls.
Tattoo parlors.
Truck fuel dispensing stations.
Truck repair facility.
Truck sales and service.
Truck washing facility.
Trucking and motor freight terminals.
Watches and clocks, including clock operated
devices - manufacturing, assembling
or
repair.
Water filtration plants and pumping stations.
Wholesale houses, warehouse and other storage
facilities
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
19/23
OC1 Office Commercial District us s not permitted in
t he M 2 Zoning District
Accountan
t
s office.
Adult Family
Home
.
Apparel stores - retail sales.
Architect s office.
Art
galleries and museums.
Artist, sculptor and composer studios.
Attorney s office.
Banks and financial institutions.
Barber and beauty shops.
Bed
and breakfast.
Business, civic, fraternal association and labor meeting rooms .
Business and technical schools.
Day-care centers.
Drug stores - retail sales.
Engineer s office.
Family Home
Florists.
Food stores - retail sales.
Foster Family Home
.
Gift shops.
Health studios and clubs.
Insurance agent s office.
Jewelry- retail sales.
Libraries.
Medical and dental office/clinic.
Mortuaries and funeral parlors.
Newsstand-
retail sales.
Nursing homes.
Photo studios.
Professional Offices not otherwise mentioned
Public parks, playgrounds and community centers.
Real estate broker s office.
Res idential use on second story
or
above.
Retail and service uses.
Schools - primary, intermediate and
secondary-
public or private.
Seamstress and tailor.
Veterinary office - no boarding.
M 2 LightIndustrial District us s not permitted in the OC
1 Zoning District
Agricultural implement sales and service.
Agricultural uses.
Auction sales.
Automobile fuel dispensing station.
Automobile repair garages - including body work
Bakeries - wholesale sales.
Beverage distributors and bottling plants .
Pharmaceutical products, including cosmetics, toiletries
and perfumes. but excluding the manufacture of soap from
Pool Halls.
Printing, publishing, binding and typesetting plants.
Railroad stations, depots, train yards, classification yards
and team tracks.
Research and engineering laboratories.
Sales offices and service centers.
Sawing an d planning mills.
Bone
, canvas, ceUophane, clay, cloth, cork, feathers, felt - Sexually oriented business.
manufacturing. assembling. compounding,
or
treatment (or any
Building material sales and storage facilities.
Carpentry shops.
Cash advance businesses.
Cement block and formed products manufacturing.
Cold storage plants.
Commercial greenhouses and nurseries.
Contractor sales, storage and equipment yards.
Crematoriums (pet and human).
Dairy and food product processing and packaging.
Driver training schools (trucks).
Dry cleaning
-commercial
.
Electrical and electronic products, components and equipment -
manufacturing, assembling
or
repair.
Equipment rental services, including cars, trucks and trailers.
Exterminating services.
Fiber, fur, glass, hair, hom, leather, paper, plastics, rubber, precious
or
semi-precious stone
or metal
sheet metal.
she
. textiles. tobacco.
Food brokers - retail, wholesale and storage without processing.
Frozen food lockers.
Garden stores.
Heating,
NC
electric and plumbing sales, service and repair.
Liquid
f u ~
petroleum products, petroleum, and volatile oils - bulk
storage stations in accordance with Section 1143.18(g) hereof.
Machine shops, tool and die shops.
Machinery and heavy equipment rental, sales and storage.
Manufacturing, assembling
or
repair
of
medical,
e n ~
optical and
similar precision instruments
or
appliances.
Meat processing and packaging, exclusive of slaughtering.
Metal products, excluding structural steel and foundry products or
product from previously prepared materials - manufacturing,
Moving and storage companies.
Musical instruments - manufacturing, assembling or repair.
Novelties, toys and rubber products - manufacturing, assembling
or
repair.
Pawn shops.
Sign painting and manufacture.
Stone products processing and manufacturing.
Tattoo parlors.
Truck fuel dispensing stations.
Truck repair facility.
Truck sales and service.
Truck washing facility.
Trucking and motor freight terminals.
Watches and clocks, including clock operated devices -
manufacturing. assembling or repair.
Water
filtration plants and pumping stations.
Wholesale houses, warehouse and other storage facilities
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
20/23
LIST OF P RCELS SSOCI TED WITH REZONING OF HOBART PROPERTY ON WEST
MAIN STREET
: No.
Parcel
Owner
P r o ~ e r t ~ d d r e s s
.. MaiUngAddress
LandUse
. Acr
1
008 003610
HOB RT BROTHERS
CO
600W MAIN ST 600 W MAIN ST TROY
OH
45373
330 2.9
2
008 003380
HOB RT BROTHERS
CO
ADAMSST
D MS T TROY
OH 45373
330 0.0
3
008 004950
HOB RT
BROTHERS CO ELM
ST ELM STTROY OH 45373
330
0.1
4
008 004960
HOB RT BROTHERS
CO
ELMST
ELM ST
TROY
OH 45373
330
0.3
5
008 004980
HOB RT
BROTHERS CO ELM
ST ElM ST
TROY
OH 45373
330
0.0
6
008 004990
HOB RT BROTHERS
CO
ELM ST ELM STTROY OH 45373
330 0.1
7
008 005010 HOB RT BROTHERS
CO
ELM
ST
ELM
ST TROY OH
45373
330
0.1
8
008 005020
HOB RT
BROTHERS CO ELM
ST
ELM
ST TROY OH
45373
330
0.1
9
008 005030
HOB RT
BROTHERS
CO
ELM
ST ELM ST
TROY
OH 45373
330
0.1
10
008 005040 HOB RT BROTHERS CO
ELM
ST
ELM ST
TROY OH
45373
330
0.1
11
008 005060
HOB RT
BROTHERS CO
ELM ST ELM STTROY OH
45373
330
0.0
12
008 005070
HOB RT BROTHERS
CO ELM ST
ELM ST TROY OH 45373
330
0.1
13
008 005075 HOB RT BROTHERS CO
ELM
ST
ELM ST
TROY OH
45373
330 .
0.2
14 008 005080
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
ElM ST
ElM
STTROYOH 45373
330 0.2
15
008 003370 HOB RT
BROTHERS
CO
J CKSON ST J CKSON ST TROY OH 45373
330 0
16
008 091220
HOB RT BROTHERS CO WMAINST MAIN STTROYOH 45373
330
0.7
17 008 005090
HOB RT
BROTHERS
CO
N ElM ST
N ElM ST TROY OH 45373
330
0.1
18 008 005100
HOB RT
BROTHERS
CO
N
ElM
ST
N ElM STTROY
OH
45373 330 0.1
19
008 005110 HOB RT BROTHERS
CO N ElM ST N ElM STTROY OH 45373
330 0.1
20
008 005460 HOB RT BROTHERS
CO N ElM ST N ElM ST TROY
OH
45373
330
0.2
21
008 008480 HOB RT BROTHERS
CO N ElM
ST
N ElM ST TROY
OH
45373
320
0.2
22
008 008490
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
N ElM ST N ElM ST TROY
OH
45373
330 0.2
23
008 008500
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
N ElM
ST N ElM
ST
TROY
OH
45373
330 0.2
24
008 :004940
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WMAINST
W MAIN STTROYOH 45373
330
.0.11
25
008 Q04955 HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WMAINST
400 ETR D SQ TROY OH 45373
330 0.48
26 008 003350
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WATERST
W TER STTROY
OH
45373
330
0
27
008 003390
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WATERST
W TER ST TROY OH 45373
330 0.08
28
008 003410
HOB RT
BROTHERS CO WATERST
W TER
STTROY OH 45373
330 0
29 008 003600 HOB RT BROTHERS
CO WATERST
W TER STTROY OH
45373
330 0.59
30 008 004995
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WATERST
400 ETR D SQ TROY OH 45373
330 0.49
31
008 005050
HOB RT BROTHERS CO
WATERST
W TER STTROY OH 45373
330 0.04
TOT
L
CRES 8.65
Note:
List does not include 9 unidentified parcels numbers
located
within the address
of
600
W
Main St.
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
21/23
December
10
2014
A meeting of the Troy Planning Commission was held Wednesday, December 10 2014, at 3:30p.m. in
second floor conference room, City Hall, Vice-Chairman Thomas Force presiding. Also present were
membe
Mahan, Titterington, Johnson, McGarry, and Beamish; Planning Staff T Davis, S Brandon and D Puckett.
The minutes of the November 12, 2014 meeting were approved.
REZONING REQUEST - 600 WEST MAIN STREET (40 PARCELS TOTAL) FROM TO M-2. LIG
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. TO OC-1, OFFICE-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; THE AREA PROPOSED TO
REZONED CONSISTS OF TEN PARCELS LOCATED ALONG NORTH ELM STREET (BETWE
WASHINGTON STREET AND WEST WATER STREET). FIVE PARCELS LOCATED ALONG T
INTERSECTION
OF
WEST WATER STREET AND ADAMS STREET, AND 25 PARCELS THAT ENCOMPA
THE 600 WEST MAIN STREET LOCATION; OWNER IS HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY; APPLICANT
CITY OF TROY. Mr. Davis commented that the City of Troy on behalf of Hobart Brothers Company has reques
the rezoning of 40 parcels from the M-2 Light-Industrial District to the OC-1 Office-Commercial District; the repor
staff (attached to original minutes) includes a list of the parcels (nine of which do not have parcels number due
prior replat and being built over), a map highlighting the parcels of the proposed rezoning; and information relate
the allowed uses under both zoning categories. It
is
noted that this includes the location of the recently demolish
Hobart Brothers/ITW factory complex that carried the address of 600 West Main Street. He further reported that
surrounding zoning districts include B-2 General Business District
to
the south, a mixture of B-2 General Busin
District and R-7 Multi-Family to the east, R-6 Two-Family Residential to the west, and M-2 Light-Industrial to
north; the razing of the old Hobart Brothers building has left an opportunity for redevelopment
in
the heart of
community; this area was once dominated by industrial uses but has since grown into a mixture of commercial a
residential uses, the City has reached out to the property owner for a rezoning of the area that will complement
commercial district and respect the nearby residential uses; a rezoning from the M-2 Light-Industrial district
to
OC-1
Office-Commercial district will fit harmoniously into this mixed use area; the Zoning Code describes the OC
Office-Commercial district as designed to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses consisting
groupings
of
professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting, clerical, stenographic and similar use
this district
is
designed and intended to act as a buffer and is intended to
be
mapped along major thoroughfares
a transitional area between nonresidential and residential uses; the OC-1 district does not permit residen
development in this district; however, it does allow residential uses on the second story or above; the OC-1 dist
limits commercial uses that are envisioned to prevent disruption to the surrounding existing residen
neighborhoods and the rezoning will protect the surrounding residences from the more intensive uses that
currently allowed
in
the M-2 zoning district; the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use (Figure 14-2) shows t
area as
it
currently
is
(industrial) and the surrounding land uses
to
remain the same,
as
a mix of commerc
government, residential and recreational uses; the industrial use does not fit well with the adjoining mix of uses; a
it
is
staff's opinion that adjoining properties will benefit from the positive impact of the proposed rezoning as
proposed OC-1 district permits the greatest flexibility to the reuse of the property while complementing the exist
commercial uses and protecting the surrounding residential zoning districts. Regarding the Section 1139
outlines the criteria on which
to
base decisions, staff reported:
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
22/23
A)
Whether the change
in
classification would be consistent with
the
intent and purpose of this Zoning Code
The proposed rezoning is consistent with Zoning Code.
As
described in
th
Zoning Code, the purpose of the
OC 1
District
is
to accommodate a mixture of office and commercial uses and is designed and intended to a
as a buffet. The OC 1 district is intended to be mapped between nonresidential and residential uses.
B)
Whether the proposed amendment is made necessary because
of
changed or changing conditions in the
area affected, and, if
so
the nature
of
such changed
or
changing conditions.
The proposed amendment
is
a result of the razing of the former Hobart Brother s building which was used
to
house an industrial
use.
This provides
an
opportunity for redevelopment in the downtown area to can promo
commercial use but also respect the surrounding residential neighborhoods.
C) Whether the uses that would be permitted on the property if t were reclassif ied would be compatible with
the uses permitted on other property in the immediate vicinity.
Commercial uses would
be
permitted on this property and is permitted on surrounding commercial properties
already
in
existence. The intent
is
to eliminate the intrusive industrial uses and create a buffer for the adjoini
commercial residential zoning districts.
D) Whether adequate utility, sewer, and water facilities, and all other needed public services exist or can be
provided
to
serve the uses that would be permitted on a property if t were reclassified.
All utilities are provided.
E)
The
amount
of
vacant land that currently has the same zoning classification as is proposed for the subjec
property, particularly in the vicinity of he subject property, and any special circumstances, in any, that make
substantial part ofsuch vacant land unavailable for development.
In
the vicinity of the subject property, there is no available vacant land with the
OC 1
zoning classification.
F) Whether the proposed amendment would correct an error in the application of this Zoning Code s applie
to the subject property.
Not applicable
in
this request.
Staff did not recommend a public hearing be held by the Commission due to the straightforward nature o
the rezoning request and the fact that City Council is required to hold a public hearing if the request proceeds on.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning from the M-2 Lig
Industrial Zoning district to the
OC 1
Office-Commercial district, based on the following:
o The proposed rezoning
is
consistent with the Zoning Code s intent to separate incompatible land uses; an
o The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts and provide flexibility
future development; and
o The OC 1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial zoning district to
surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.
Discussion: Mr. Force asked about the Troy Lumber Property, located adjacent to the site of the propos
rezoning, and was advised that Mr. Goodall, owner of Troy Lumber, now owns that site; that he was contac
about being included
in
the rezoning and advised that while
he
supported the redevelopment of the site, at this ti
he did not want
to
include his property in the area proposed to be rezoned.
In
response to Mayor Beamish, it w
stated that as
OC 1
allows residential units
on
a second floor, this could
be
a benefit for the land
to be
m
marketable and the OR zoning permits uses that may
be
more disruptive to the neighborhood. Mr. McGarry stat
he was pleased to see that the city is taking the initiative on this rezoning proposal.
8/9/2019 City Council Committee Meetings (1/27/2015)
23/23
PUBLIC HEARING: A motion was made by Mayor Beamish, seconded by Mrs. Mahan, that the Plan
Commission not holds a public hearing, noting that one will
be
held by Council.
MOTION PASSED, UNANIMOUS VOT
REZONING REQUEST: A motion was made by
Mr.
McGarry, seconded by Mrs. Johnson, that
Planning Commission recommends to Troy City Council that the rezoning request identified as 600 West M
Street (40 parcels total) from
to
M-2, Light-Industrial District, to OC-1 Office-Commercial District,
be
appro
based on the findings
o
staff that:
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Zoning Code s intent
to
separate incompatible land uses; a
The proposed rezoning will complement the existing commercial zoning districts and provide flexibility
future development; and
o The OC-1 zoning district will act as a buffer from the surrounding commercial zoning district to
surrounding residentially zoned neighborhoods.
MOTION PASSED, UNANIMOUS VOT