Bill DawsonChief, Policy and Policy Compliance
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Bill DawsonChief, Policy and Policy Compliance
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Presentation to
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATIONHerndon, VA
14 September 2004
Presentation to
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATIONHerndon, VA
14 September 2004
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Our water infrastructure Our water infrastructure supports our quality of life. It supports our quality of life. It delivers:delivers:• prosperity • safety and protection• healthy ecosystems• commerce• usable water• energy• enjoyment
Meeting the Meeting the Nation’s NeedsNation’s Needs
Meeting the Meeting the Nation’s NeedsNation’s Needs
Economic Security = National SecurityEconomic Security = National Security
Our Quality of LifeOur Quality of LifeDepends on WaterDepends on Water
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Our Message to the Our Message to the American PeopleAmerican People
Our Message to the Our Message to the American PeopleAmerican People
• We have a vital role in the GlobalWar on Terror
• We support work that will provide for sustainability for the future, and address critical water resources infrastructure needs
• We execute, to best of our abilities, focusing on:• Contributing to national security• Energizing the economy• Enhancing our environment
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
StrengtheningStrengtheningOur SecurityOur Security
StrengtheningStrengtheningOur SecurityOur Security
• 40% of proposed budget supports U.S. commercial transportation network we use to deploy military vessels.
• Over 300 security reviews and assessments of our locks, dams, hydropower projects and other facilities.
• We improved security engineering capability and prioritized critical infrastructure and are implementing at 85 critical projects.
Corps experience and history of relief and support during natural disasters is proving invaluable as soldiers and civilians of USACE help rebuild Iraq.
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Strengthening Our Strengthening Our EconomyEconomy
Strengthening Our Strengthening Our EconomyEconomy
• U.S. navigation network critical to domestic trans-portation and international
trade. • Support for aging waterway
infrastructure critical.• Funding for flood control and storm damage
projects about 27% of budget.• Every $1 spent on flood control projects
prevents over $6 in damages
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Enhancing Our Enhancing Our EnvironmentEnvironment
Enhancing Our Enhancing Our EnvironmentEnvironment
19% of budget supports efforts to protect and restore the environment
All of our projects strive to adhere to the Corps Environmental Operating Principles
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Criticisms of UsCriticisms of UsCriticisms of UsCriticisms of Us
• Biased in favor of construction
• Non-transparent• Environmentally insensitive• Seeking inappropriate
growth into new mission areas
• Not treating partners as equals
• Too slow from problem identification to solution
• Losing technical capability
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
ChallengesChallengesChallengesChallenges
Environmental restoration – restoring nationally significant resources
Aging infrastructure – performance & safety implications
Balancing objectives – between traditional water resources demands & environmental or ecosystem goals
Minimizing institutional barriers – to efficient, effective water resources planning, decision making and management
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Challenge: Large Scale Challenge: Large Scale Environment RestorationEnvironment Restoration Challenge: Large Scale Challenge: Large Scale
Environment RestorationEnvironment Restoration
EvergladesCoastal LouisianaGreat LakesAnd More On the Way
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Challenge: Aging Water Challenge: Aging Water Resources InfrastructureResources Infrastructure
Challenge: Aging Water Challenge: Aging Water Resources InfrastructureResources Infrastructure
Investments in water resources infrastructure have declined in real terms
Aging infrastructure results in more frequent closures for repairs, decreased performance and costly delays
Unscheduled delays draw resources from scheduled maintenance
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Challenge:Challenge:Balancing ObjectivesBalancing Objectives
Challenge:Challenge:Balancing ObjectivesBalancing Objectives
Environment
Flood & CoastalStorm Damage
Reduction
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Challenge: Minimizing Challenge: Minimizing Institutional BarriersInstitutional Barriers
Challenge: Minimizing Challenge: Minimizing Institutional BarriersInstitutional Barriers
AuthoritiesPlanning ProcessesRelationshipsBudgeting Processes
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
What We Are DoingWhat We Are DoingWhat We Are DoingWhat We Are Doing
• HQ streamlining/elimination of layers of review
• Delegated post-authorization and reconnaissance report approval
• Planning improvements and model R&D
• Civil Works Strategic Plan• Environmental Advisory Board
and Operating Principles• Office of Water Project Review• WRDA Provisions• USACE 2012
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
ObjectivesObjectivesObjectivesObjectives
• Re-focus on mission objectives, not subordinate processes
• Streamline Project Review and Approval
• Leverage technology in project execution
• Enhance technical capability
• Save money• Become more flexible
and responsive
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
A USACE 2012A USACE 2012GlossaryGlossary
A USACE 2012A USACE 2012GlossaryGlossary
• RBC: Regional Business Center, a.k.a. Division; an extension of HQ with mission to leverage talents of subordinate districts, conduct regional-level interface.
• RIT: Regional Integration Team, at Washington HQ, one team for each of the 8 RBCs, integrating all disciplines and activities of HQ to enable RBCs and District to deliver products to our partners.
• CoP: Community of Practice: A grouping of Corps members at Washington, RBC and District level with similar interests (e.g., planning, environmental, public affairs, etc.) having frequent contact with each other to maintain professional skills at highest level.
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
CommunitiesCommunitiesof Practiceof Practice
Stakeholders
AcademiaProfessional/Trade
Organizations
Govt Agencies
IndustryBecoming a Learning Organization… Leveraging the Knowledge
Cross Functional PDT
PMPM
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
What Does This What Does This Mean for YOU?Mean for YOU?What Does This What Does This Mean for YOU?Mean for YOU?
• Decision-making authority closer to project execution
• Stronger collaborative partnerships
• Reduced project delivery costs• Common business practices • Broadened knowledge and
experience platforms• Enhanced technical capability
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Funding IssuesFunding IssuesFunding IssuesFunding Issues
• Funding shortfalls this year are more severe than at any point in the last 30 years– Reduced appropriations in “real dollars”– Virtual elimination of usable carry-over from prior
years– Impacts studies, construction, and operations and
maintenance
• How we are responding:– This year: “just in time” movement of $ and
national program reviews – “get by” in the short term
– Fundamental change in approach to budgeting . . . “a little for everyone” not working
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
Civil Works ProgramCivil Works Program($ Millions)($ Millions)
Civil Works ProgramCivil Works Program($ Millions)($ Millions)
FY03 FY04 FY04FY05 FY05 HouseExpended Budget Appropriation Budget Markup
Construction, Gen. 1,812 1,350 1,722 1,421.5 1,880Ops. & Maint., Gen. 2,135 1,939 1,968 1,925 1,980Gen. Investigations 148 100 117 90.5 145Miss. River & Tribs. 340 280 324 270 325Regulatory 141 144 140 150 140Flood/Coastal Emerg. * 37 70 * 0 50 0FUSRAP 145 140 140 140 190Gen. Expenses 147 171 160 167 167 Total Appropriation 4,905 4,194 4,571 4,215 4,827
* Flood Control & Coastal Emergencies includes $60 M FY03 supplemental, partially carried over into FY04
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
FY 04 AppropriationFY 04 Appropriationby Business Programby Business ProgramFY 04 AppropriationFY 04 Appropriationby Business Programby Business Program
NavEmerg MgtFCEnvi & RegWater SupHydroRecExec Dir
Navigation$1,816 M40%
Emergency Management$7 M 0.2%
Flood & StormDamage Reduction
$1,213 M27%
Environment& Regulatory$867 M19%
Hydropower
$246 M 5%
Recreation
$260 M 6%
Ex
ec
. Dir. &
Mg
mt.
$1
60
M 3
%
Water Supply $3 M 0.1%
Total = $4,571 M
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
• Priorities for funding, as well as amounts going to projects and activities, will vary greatly from that traditionally seen
• Priority to funds providing most value for money—performance metrics
• No business, account or regional element guaranteed a "pot"
• All activities will live by their performance
New for FY05: New for FY05: Performance-Based Performance-Based
BudgetingBudgeting
US ArmyUS ArmyCorps of EngineersCorps of Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineers
Budget – Way AheadBudget – Way Ahead
U.S. Army Corps of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineers
Budget – Way AheadBudget – Way Ahead• Continued operations in a fiscally constrained
environment• Refining performance and prioritization
measures as we develop FY 06 budget• Growing Congressional interest in 5-Year plan
to focus $ on high pay-off projects and hold back others