+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge...

ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge...

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
14
ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources
Transcript
Page 1: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

ClaiMakerKnowledge Media Institute

Open University, UK

Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources

Page 2: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

ClaiMaker: Making scholarly claims on the semantic Web (interpretive connections

between sources)

improves on

How can we express the (contestable) view that the work reported in Document B improves on a proposal in Document A?

Page 3: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Document A

Page 4: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Document B

Page 5: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Document A:

A key passage

Page 6: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

In ClaiMaker, the analyst creates and links a new concept to Document A that encapsulates the key passage

Page 7: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Document A:

Another key passage of interest

Page 8: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

In ClaiMaker, the analyst has now added two concepts to Document A

Page 9: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Once the analyst has added concepts for Document B (or perhaps someone else has already added them), the connection between them can be made.

Page 10: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

ClaiMaker provides a menu-based interface offering a set of relational types based on scholarly argumentation

Page 11: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

ClaiMaker provides novel services to review the claims that have been made in the literature: What documents agree with Document A?

Page 12: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

ClaiMaker provides novel services to review the claims that have been made in the literature: What links have been made to and from Document A ?

Page 13: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Visualizing the ‘lineage’ (intellectual history) of the top concept Tool provides zooming, rotation, focusing and filtering

Interactive visualization in Ceryle (KMi, Open U., UK), extending TouchGraph(Alex Shapiro)

Page 14: ClaiMaker Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK Illustrative slides showing how knowledge claims can be made between web resources.

Visualizing Argumentation (2002, in press), Springer

www.VisualizingArgumentation.info

Argument mapping for scholarly publishing, scientific and public policy debates, education, teamwork, and organisational memory

Afterword: Doug Engelbart


Recommended