Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | beatrix-cummings |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 2 times |
CLASS 3 OUTLINE
The Economics of Business
Harvard Extension SchoolInstructor: Bob WaylandTeaching Assistant: Natasha Wambebe
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
2
Revisit Class Two
Alchian and Demsetz, “Production, InformationCosts, and Economic Organization”How do Alchian and Demsetz differ from
Coase in explaining the origin of firms?What is a cooperative team, what are its
important characteristics?What do Alchian and Demsetz view as the
fundamental distinguishing characteristic of firms?
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
3
Revisit Class Two…
Alchian and Demsetz, continuedWhat role does shirking play? Why do people tend to shirk?Who meters and monitors the managers?How is management shirking discouraged?What compensation characteristic can be used
to distinguish types of firms?
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
4
Revisit Class Two continued…
Stigler, “The Division of Labor is Limited by theExtent of the Market”What is meant by vertical integration?How does vertical integration relate to “make-or-buy”What factor does Stigler focus on in
explaining the degree of vertical integration?How does the degree of vertical integration
sometimes change over the life of the firm? What insights into outsourcing can you derive
from Stigler’s analysis?
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
5
Nature vs. Nurture
Marshall, “The Mecca of the economist lies in economic biology rather than in economic dynamics.”
Tension between Darwinian and Newtonian systems perspective
Role of man versus nature in determining success
Management hubris e.g., “inventing the future”
Collins et al notion of super manager and super firm
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
6
In Search of Superfirm
Collins et al employ an exemplary firm process based on sorting databases for high performers
Statistical flaw of “selecting for the dependent variable” Leads to a very truncated distribution; no basis for
evaluating the larger population Not scientific
Does not test a hypothesis Does not examine range of variables, e.g. as in regression No dynamic model, no “if-then” capacity
Firm is not directly the unit of competition or selection
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
7
Uncertainty and Survival
Knight’s distinction between measurable risk and unmeasurable uncertainty
We cannot see the future but must still make decisions Uncertainty necessary for existence of economic profit* (No
profit if all can see the future.) Entrepreneur makes decisions under uncertainty and reaps the
rewards or losses (e.g. pays factors at current value, receives future value)
Eventually limits of survival are reached Entrepreneurial capacity is the ultimate fixed factor and he is not omniscient
Environment moves in unanticipated manner Prior adaptations inhibit reaction Others are found more fit and selected or adopted by the environment
* Profit or residual over and above the opportunity cost of capital necessary to attract it to the endeavor
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
8
Models and Judgment
Models are a way to capture and apply knowledge and experience May be informal or formal Seek to reduce the degree of uncertainty If system modeled is completely deterministic (“if-then”), quality of
prediction depends on knowledge of initial conditions and the continuity of system characteristics. E.g. Physics as expressed by LaPlace If system’s dynamics are very sensitive to initial conditions and those are
difficult to precisely measure, results are effectively uncertain (complexity) If a system produces emergent phenomena which are different from the
initial set, the outcome is not predictable But models also create an intellectual feedback loop and influence our
view of the world. Most applied models used in decision making under uncertainty implicitly
assume way too much certainty and a strict notion of equilibrium
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
9
Achieving Equilibriums vs. Tendencies
Simple physical systems tend to reach equilibrium quicklyComplex physical systems may take a long time, e.g. the
expansion of the universe. But, so far as we know, it will get to some sort of cold death equilibrium one day
Economics generally conceived as a quickly equilibrating system that is normally in equilibrium until disturbed whereupon it quickly finds a new equilibrium as illustrated by comparative statics
Austrian school didn’t accept the notion of a normal state of equilibrium and argued that there was only a tendency toward equilibrium
Evolutionary economics views the economy as having a tendency to equilibrium but there is no reason to believe it necessary to get there and the trip itself is very interesting
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
10
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory”
Alchian sets out an evolutionary approach todescribing firm behavior: Embodies principles of biological evolution and natural
selection (recall Marshall) Economic system is an adoptive mechanism that selects
from “exploratory” actions generated by adaptive pursuit of profits or success
Alchian establishes his notion of environmental adoption and then combines it with a notion of behavior under uncertainty and incomplete information
Under these conditions, people engage in adaptive, trial and error, imitative, innovative behavior
This contrasts starkly with the typical picture of foresight and perfect rationality often ascribed to economic actors
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
11
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
“Profit Maximization” Not a Guide to ActionUnder Uncertainty:Economic behavior was often modeled as being
undertaken by highly rational creatures with perfect foresight seeking optimum outcomes
Gerhard Tintner, a pioneering econometrician, argued that under uncertainty, the notion of “profit maximization” is meaningless
Without perfect foresight, i.e. certainty, there is no basis for profit maximization as a guide to behavior (of course with perfect foresight there is no need for “profit”)
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
12
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
Without perfect foresight, i.e. certainty, there is no basis for profit maximization as a guide to behavior
Without uncertainty there is no profitThe market can price risk but not uncertainty
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
13
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
Frank Knight’s famous distinction betweenrisk and uncertaintyRisk; known potential and measurable
outcomes and probabilitiesUncertainty; unknown outcomes and
probabilities Judgment; the phenomena that converts
uncertainty into basis for action (probably related to entrepreneurial capacity)
People differ wrt to judgmental capability Some specialize in offering judgment
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
14
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” (an aside)
Complexity theory provides perspective on flawed foresight:
The study of complex dynamical systems, aka science of surprise
Insight into why we are “surprised” Models fail us in depicting reality especially in the
presence of uncertainty
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
15
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” resumed
“Success Is Based On Results, Not Motivation”
Realized profits (not maximum) are the mark of success and ticket to continue playing
It doesn’t matter how they came about, their existence is sufficient
Success reflects relative superiority, doesn’t require motivation and may simply reflect luck
The environment selects (adopts) from among those offered on the basis of fitness
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
16
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
“Chance Or Luck Is One Method Of Achieving Success”
Conscious decision making is not necessary in a selective and adoptive environment
If a success factor is randomly acquired, e.g. an unplanned trip route that happens to include gas stations, the selection’s success is valid and can be explained
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
17
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
“Chance Does Not Imply Nondirected, Random Allocation Of Resources”
Borel’s illustration of the surprising persistence of some random games precludes ascribing longevity to foresight and rationality
Random horse race bettors will produce ex post set of perfect “forecasts”
A set of people acting with some foresight and motivation may not be distinguishable from a group of random actors
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
18
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
A chance-dominated model does not precludeprediction, explanation, or diagnoses: Realized requisites for survival under alternative
conditions permit statements about likely results under various situations
Economists like everyone else have 20-20 hindsight and can use their tools to explain past outcomes
It is not necessary that any particular firm change its behavior but only that the set of firms selected for the next round behave in a manner “fit” for environment
Questionnaire methods are often invalid tests of marginalist conditions. Responder may declare intentions different from marginalist behavior
but survivors will be those whose characteristics fit the new environment
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
19
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
“Individual Adapting Via Imitation And Trial and Error”
Firms will imitate successful behaviors, imitation of successful actions is a justifiable reaction. Adopting standard or orthodox rules of behavior, especially those of winners makes sense when: There may be no obvious criterion for the decision-
making Environmental variability may discourage new models The problem may be very complicated Uncertainty may make the problem intractable Superiority to rivals is crucial There may be no practicable trial-and-error mechanism
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
20
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
Imitation is a way to avoid making decisions and being accountable (“No one was ever fired for buying IBM”)
Much of the passion for “benchmarking” and “world-class practices” is based on avoiding a painful and risky analysis of options.
Much of innovation is accounted for by imperfect or flawed imitation resulting in unintended innovation (analogous to new characteristics emerging from DNA copying errors)
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
21
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
In addition to imitation, trial-and-error is a conscious form of adaptive behavior under uncertainty
Trial-and-error does not guarantee an eventual optimum will be reached
The near-sighted grasshopper may find a local maximum but not see the distant global maximum
Trial-and-error may work when the function is continually rising, without dips, to the optimum
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
22
Armen A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory” continued
“The economic counterparts of genetic heredity, mutations, and natural selection are imitation, innovation, and positive profits”
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
23
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Earlier interest in dynamics, disequilibrium, and trial-and-error searches for profitable positions was displaced by the notion of highly rational searches for optimum solutions
Interest revived with increasing interest in industries subject to technological disruption
Schumpeterian notions of continual disequilibrium and creative learning and destruction regained attention
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
24
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Nelson and Winter describe four characteristics of dynamic economic systems
Variety refers to the number of different approaches or models present at various rounds and subject to selection
Behavioral continuity is necessary to give selection validity. Selection from among randomly behaving actors is pointless.
Profit induced growth is necessary to equip the winners in one round with additional resources to contest the next
Limited path dependence rules out a powerful feed-back mechanism from quickly eliminating all but one player
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
25
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary
Theorizing in Economics”
In their section on competence, learning and routines, Nelson and Winter address what they call the “competence puzzle”
Dichotomy between competence exhibited in routinized actions and poor performance in novel situations or cases where complex logical analysis is called for
Competency can be acquired by learning and training involving short term feed back
Complex and effective behavior is routinized behavior Routines persist in part because they economize on learning
related costs and reduce frictions caused by unanticipated experimentation or novel behavior
The heart of the development puzzle is how incredibly complex technologies, systems, and organizations emerge – they evolve in incremental steps
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
26
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Nelson and Wilson argue that evolutionaryapproaches are more concerned with consistencywith current science of learning (as opposed to looking for evidence of consistency with rationalityassumptions)Separate parts of the brain are involved in mastering
routines and in engaging in complex rational analysisOnce learned, routines or skills are difficult to adjust
quickly (game example)Persistence of routines and inherited practices can and
often does inhibit adaptive behavior (e.g. Polaroid)
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
27
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Nelson and Winter describe Schumpeterian competition asevolutionary behavior:
Schumpeter was particularly interested in cases where change was driven by technological innovations
In models where internally generated innovation resulted in greater profitability and a cycle of innovation driven profitability resulted, there is a tendency toward concentration
When the technological innovations come from outside the industry, the tendency toward concentration is eliminated or greatly reduced
A distinction is drawn between “science-based” and “cumulative” innovation.
Science-based innovation tends to be external and offers no particular firm-specific advantage
Cumulative innovation tends to favor firms with well-funded and effective in-house R&D
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
28
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
The dominant design model of industry life cycles involves:
A new, unsettled technology stimulates a number of different views on how best to achieve its benefits
An early period of high levels of entry with many different models Firms continue to enter and try new approaches, failed attempts exit
(a high level of variety continues) Eventually methods and approaches converge on a dominant design Thereafter competition is less product-based and innovation efforts
shift toward process improvement As some firms become significantly more efficient, the rate of exit
increases and Finally a relatively few large firms remain The dominant design model has been tested and succeeded in
explaining industry structure and evolution in a number of sectorsNext week’s Klepper article provides a comprehensive exposition
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
29
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Incumbents are more at risk when the change is external, science-driven, and changes the architecture of the system
Incumbents can often weather change that comes from within the industry, is of the cumulative sort, and affects components of the system
The power of foresight in explaining technological innovation is surprisingly weak or absent.
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
30
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Nelson and Winter isolate some commoncharacteristics of new technology paths:A great deal of uncertainty prevails and expert
opinions have a wide varianceWinners and losers usually don’t emerge until
significant investments have been made in rival approaches
Anyone, in government or out, who believes they can pick winners among emerging technologies is ignorant of the history of technology and innovation and incredibly arrogant
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
31
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Technological advance is a source of disruptionand growth and the process displays certainfeatures:
Most scholars view it as an evolutionary system Industry structure and technology tend to co-evolve –
rapid growth and progress, stable period, followed by concentration when the technology matures
Technology involves both artifacts (practice) and a body of understanding which, over time, tend to advance together
Current efforts to define “innovation systems”
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
32
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, “Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics”
Evolutionary economic models are similar in manyrespects to those used in biology:
In contrast to the analytical engines of neoclassical modeling, evolutionary models often seek to replicate or explain patterns and paths
In a subject which assumes that foresight is rare and usually flawed, it is difficult to build “predictive” models
In general, evolutionary economics is more open and amenable to outside science and approaches. But it is not much more so than other new branches such as behavioral economics.
The rejection of the neoclassical assumptions of highly rational behavior and foresight accounts for most of the openness to other disciplines.
Incomplete without oral accompaniment
33
Next Week
Steven Klepper models a dynamic process of product sector evolution through the entry-exit-concentration cycle found in many industries
Provides a rigorous explanation for commonly observed “regularities” and especially the emergence of a “dominant design”
Forges a logical connection between innovation and business success over the product life cycle
Contains calculusSome people may find the more accessible but less
economically rigorous article “Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms” by Fernando F. Suarez and James M. Utterback in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 6 (Sep., 1995) helpful to read before Klepper.