BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofitpublishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access tocritical research.
Classification, natural history, and evolution ofNeorthopleurinae Opitz (Coleoptera, Cleridae). Part III. TheGenera Agaphalera Opitz, Allochotes Westwood, KataspinulaOpitz, Lebasiella Spinola, Loedelia Lucas, Patuleius Fairmaire,Rifkindius Opitz, and Romanaeclerus WinklerAuthor(s): Weston OpitzSource: Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 89(4):244-258. 2013.Published By: Pacific Coast Entomological SocietyDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3956/2013-20.1URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3956/2013-20.1
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in thebiological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable onlineplatform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations,museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated contentindicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercialuse. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to theindividual publisher as copyright holder.
Classification, natural history, and evolution of Neorthopleurinae Opitz(Coleoptera, Cleridae). Part III. The Genera Agaphalera Opitz,
Allochotes Westwood, Kataspinula Opitz, Lebasiella Spinola, LoedeliaLucas, Patuleius Fairmaire, Rifkindius Opitz, and
Romanaeclerus Winkler
WESTON OPITZ
Kansas Wesleyan University, Department of Biology, 100 East Claflin Avenue,
Salina, Kansas 67401-6196 U.S.A.
e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. A treatise involving eight genera that form a monophyletic group within
Neorthopleurinae is presented. Three new species of the subfamily are described: Agaphalera
corallina, sp. nov., A. cymatilis, sp. nov., and Loedelia westcotti, sp. nov. An intergeneric
phylogeny is proposed and a key to genera is included. Keys to the species of Agaphalera Opitz2009b and Loedelia Lucas 1920 are included.
Key Words. Coleoptera, Cleridae, Neorthopleurinae, checkered beetles, new species,
taxonomy, phylogeny.
INTRODUCTION
This is the third of a series of works that attempts to make better known the
checkered beetle taxa of subfamily Neorthopleurinae Opitz. In essence, the work
represents a spinoff project from a more comprehensive treatise that reassesses the
subfamilial classification of World Cleridae (Opitz 2010). The eight genera treated
herein form a monophyletic group among the 22 genera that comprise the
Neorthopleurinae Opitz. The more speciose genus of this monophyletic group,
Allochotes Westwood 1875, is currently under revision by other authors. For now,
keys are provided of the less speciose genera to which new species are added.
SPECIMENS AND METHODS
This study is based on 169 specimens. The species descriptions are brief while the
generic characteristics are comprehensively described by Opitz (2009b). Generic level
morphological diversity is extensive among many groups of the Cleridae, whereas
species level diversity in often minimal. The species concept follows Standfuss (1896:
115) and Mayr (1963: 19). Methods involving dissection, measurements, descriptive
terminology, and techniques of illustrations follow Opitz (2010: 35).
Specimens are deposited in the British Museum of Natural History (BMNH)
(Maxwell V. L. Barclay), California Academy of Sciences (CASC) (David H.
Kavanaugh), California State Collection of Arthropods (CSCA) (Stephen Gaimari),
Canadian Museum of Nature (CMNC) (Robert S. Anderson), Field Museum of
Natural History (FMNH) (James H. Boone), Florida State Collection of Arthropods
(FSCA) (Michael Thomas, Paul E. Skelley), Jacques Rifkind Collection (JNRC),
Kansas University-Biodiversity Institute (SEMC) (Zachary Falin), Museum d’His-
toire Naturelle (MNHN) (Antoine Mantilleri), Texas A & M University (TAMU)
(Edward G. Riley), University of California, Riverside (UCRC) (Doug Yanega), Utah
THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST89(4):244–258, (2013)
State University (EMUS) (Carol D. VanDohlen), Weston Opitz Collection (WOPC),
and William F. Barr Entomology Museum (WFBM) (Frank W. Merickel).
PHYLOGENETICS OF GENERA
The tenets involving phylogenetic analysis follow Hennig (1966) and the character
matrix (Table 1) was analyzed via NONA (Goloboff 2003) in combination with
Winclada version 1.00.08 (Nixon 2002). The analysis resulted in a single tree
(Fig. 25), which involves 20 steps, index of consistency of 100, and an index of
retention of 100. Heuristic analysis [maximum tree (hold)] 5 100, number of
replications 9 (mult) 5 100, and multiple TBR (mult max) was used.
CHARACTER STATES
Twenty morphological and two geographical character states were used to analyze
the evolutionary relationships among the eight genera included in this treatise.
Outgroups involve the remaining 14 genera of Neorthopleurinae (Opitz 2009b).
Character states assessed ‘‘0’’ are considered plesiotypic (Tuomikosky 1967), while
those evaluated as ‘‘1’’ are judged apotypic (Table 1). Methods that involve
determination of the evolutionary states of characters are amply noted in Ekis (now
Opitz) (1977: 166) and Nixon and Carpenter (1993: 413).
Table 1. Character matrix for 22 morphological characters of genera included in this study.
Taxa Characters
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Outgroup 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Agaphalera 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0Allochotes 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Kataspinula 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lebasiella 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Loedelia 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Patuleius 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rifkindius 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0Romanaeclerus 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Character 0 Pronototergostenal suture: (0) complete; (1) not complete
Character 1 Shape of postgular process: (0) not petiolate; (1) petiolate
Character 2 Body form: (0) oblong long; (1) oblong shortCharacter 3 Ovipositor: (0) not very long; (1) very long
Character 4 Epipleuron: (0) not partially inflexed; (1) partially inflexed
Character 5 Distribution: (0) Old World; (1) New World
Character 6 Asetiferous punctations: (0) seriate; (1) aseriate
Character 7 Hind body form: (0) not oval; (1) oval
Character 8 Elytral humerus: (0) not bulging; (1) bulging
Character 9 Phallic plate: (0) not spinous; (1) spinous
Character 10 Land: (0) continental; (1) insularCharacter 11 Epipleuron: (0) not extensively ridged; (1) extensively ridged
Character 12 Apex of tibiae: (0) without bifid setae; (1) with bifid setae
Character 13 Phallic membrane: (0) without spines; (1) with spines
Character 14 Tibial spur formula: (0) 2-2-2; (1) 1-1-1
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 245
KEY TO GENERA
1. Last maxillary palpomere digitiform. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Last maxillary palpomere not digitiform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2. Elytral asetiferous punctations aseriate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
- Elytral asetiferous punctations seriate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Seventh antennomere larger than eight (Mexico) . . . . . Rifkindius Opitz 2009b
- Seventh antennomere not larger than eight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Extremity of prointercoxal process triangular; pronotal projections nearly
touch prointercoxal process; forebody yellow (Costa Rica, Honduras,
Mexico, Nicaragua, U.S.A.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lebasiella Spinola 1844
- Extremity of prointercoxal process not triangular; pronotal projections
distant from prointercoxal process; forebody black (Mexico) . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kataspinula Opitz 2009b
5. Epipleuron inflexed; funicular antennomeres not widened (Madagas-
car) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patuleius Fairmaire 1902
- Epipleuron not inflexed, in ventral position; funicular antennomeres
widened (Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cote D’Ivoire,
Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Sao Tome, South Africa, Tanzania). . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Romanaeclerus Winkler 1960
6. Body rotund; antenna serrate (Bhutan, Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, China,
India, Japan, Malaysia, Nepal, North Vietnam, New Guinea, Philippines,Sri Lanka, Sumatra) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allochotes Westwood 1875
- Body not rotund; antenna not serrate, capitates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Tarsal unguis bifid (Mexico, U.S.A.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia Lucas 1920
- Tarsal unguis not bifid (Mexico) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agaphalera Opitz 2009b
TAXONOMY
One intent of this publication is to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among
the eight genera listed in the title. The phylogeny of the other 14 genera of
Neorthopleurinae is presented in part II of this series of publications (Opitz in
preparation) whose purpose is to bring to light Neorthopleurinae systematics. The
genera included in this work were recently described and copiously illustrated
elsewhere (Opitz 2009b). In this treatise I make known generic level phylogenetics,
increase the species inventory of Neorthopleurinae by three, and present for the firsttime keys of the known species of Agaphalera and Loedelia. A generic description of
Agaphalera and Loedelia is provided to assure a continuance of understanding of
those generic-level characteristics relevant to the new species descriptions. Rifkindius
and Kataspinula remain monotypic. It needs to be clarified that Opitz (2009b: 185,
Character 15 Intraspicular plate: (0) present; (1) absent
Character 16 Dorsal plate of phallobase: (0) not elongated; (1) elongated
Character 17 Funicular antennomere 5: (0) not larger than six; (1) larger than six
Character 18 Tegmen: (0) lobed distally; (1) not lobed distallyCharacter 19 Antennomeres 9 and 10: (0) not acuminate anterodistally; (1) acuminate
anterodistally
Character 20 Basal denticle: (0) small; (1) large
Character 21 Unguis: (0) not bifid; (1) bifid
246 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
2010: 50) erroneously noted that the tarsal pulvillar formula for Romanaeclerus asbeing 0-0-0, when in fact it is 2-2-2 (Opitz 2009a). Taxonomically, what remains to be
done with this monophyletic branch of Neorthopleurinae is to comprehensively
revise the Asiatic genus Allochotes and the Madagascan genus Patuleius.
Agaphalera Opitz (Opitz 2009b:142)
(Figs. 2, 3, 7–10, 13–15, 19, 21, 22)
Type Species. Lebasiella janthina LeConte 1866:99.
Diagnosis. Specimens of Agaphalera resemble superficially those of Loedelia. But,
in Agaphalera specimens the denticle of the unguis is large and somewhat truncate
(Fig. 19) not acuminate as in specimens of Loedelia (Fig. 20).
Figure 1. Habitus of Loedelia maculicollis (LeConte).
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 247
Description. Size: Length 3.2–5.5 mm; width 1.4–2.4 mm. Form (Figs. 21, 22):
Oblong short, robust, deep bodied, about 2 times longer than broad. Vestiture: Disc
of cranium and pronotum densely vested with stout setae, elytra vested only with 1usetae. Head (Fig. 13): Cranium subspheroid, frons very wide, indented with shallow
setiferous punctations, latter not widely separated; gula (Fig. 15) very small, process
short, narrow, and minutely forked; labrum short, medial incision curvate concave;
mandible, body short, anterior, medial, and posterior dens well developed, penicillus
well developed; maxilla, laterolacinia present, terminal palpomere subsecuriform
(Fig. 14); labium, terminal palpomere narrow triangular; eyes small, finely facetted;
antenna (Figs. 2, 3) capitate, capitulum lax and short, capitular antennomeres 9 and
Figures 2–12. Various organs. 2–4 Antennae. 2) Agaphalara cymatilis. 3) A. corallina. 4)Loedelia westcotti. 5–6) Mesodermal reproductive organs of Loedelia maculicollis (5 male, 6 female).7–12) Aedeagi. 7–8) Agaphalera corallina (7 phallus, 8 tegmen). 9–10) A. cymatilis (9 phallus, 10tegmen). 11–12) Loedelia westcotti (11 phallus, 12 tegmen).
248 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
10 subacuminate at their anterodistal angle. Thorax: Pronotum transverse, convex,
side margins evenly rounded, sculptured with very small round setiferous
punctations, prointercoxal process not expanded distally; pronotal projections
short, do not contact prointercoxal process; elytron sculptured with small asetiferous
Figures 13–15. Various organs of Agaphalera janthina. 13) Head. 14) Mouthparts. 15)Gular process.
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 249
punctations, latter aseriate, 1u setae always adjacent to asetiferous punctations, 2usetae absent, epipleural fold expanded in proximal half and extended to elytral distaltwo-thirds; metendosternite with furcal lamina; legs, tibial spur formula 2-2-2, tarsal
pulvillar formula 3-3-3, unguis with large truncate denticle. Abdomen: Aedeagus
shorter than length of abdomen, phallobasic lobes minutely fimbriate; lateral plates
Figures 16–18. Various organs of Loedelia mexicana. 16) Head. 17) Mouthparts. 18) Gular process.
250 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
of spicular fork acuminated laterally, spicular apodemes fused, interspicular plate
minute and rod-shaped; ovipositor, ventral and dorsal laminae multilobed, laminal
rod present; distal margin of pygidium and 6th visible sternite rounded, not incised.
Alimentary Canal: Stomodaeal valve comprised of 4 primary lobes. Mesodermal
Male Internal Reproductive Organs: No information available. Mesodermal Female
Internal Reproductive Organs: No information available.
Agaphalera corallina, sp. nov.
(Figs. 3, 7, 8, 21)
Holotype -. Mexico, Puebla, Hwy. 190, 7 km SSE Acatlan, 1280 m, 5 July 1992,
C. L. Bellamy, colls. (LACM).
Paratypes. Ten specimens. Mexico: Guerrero: 9.6 km NE Tixtla, 16-VII-1984, J.
Woolley (WOPC, 2); 9.6 km E Xochipala, 18-VII-1985, J. B. Wooley (WOPC, 1):
Puebla: Hwy. 190, 7 km SSE Acatlan, 5-VII-1992, 1280 m, C. L. Bellamy (JNRC, 3;
WOPC 2); idem, R. L. Wescott (WOPC, 1): Morelos: Tlaquiltenango, Huaxtla,
Figures 19–20. Ungues. 19) Agaphalera janthina. 20) Loedelia mexicana.
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 251
18 37486u N, 99 05642u W, Selva Baja Caducifolia, Golpeando vegetacion, 22-VII-
2009, V. H. Toledo (JNRC, 1).
Diagnosis. Specimens of this species resemble superficially the members of
Agaphalera cymatilis, sp. nov., but in specimens of A. corallina the epipleural margins
are subconvex, whereas in cymatilis specimens the epipleural margins are subparallel.
Description. Size: Length 5.0 mm; width 2.0 mm. Form (Fig. 21): Integumental
Color: Antennae and terminal palpomeres brown, forebody and legs yellow-brown,tarsi infuscated, elytra, pterothoracic venter, and abdomen dark blue. Integumental
Structure: Cranium and pronotum minutely punctated; elytral surface punctations
shallow, punctations aseriate; antenna capitate, capitulum short and lax, funicular
Figures 21–24. Habiti. 21) Agaphalera corallina. 22) A. cymatilis. 23) Loedelia westcotti. 24)Loedelia westcotti.
252 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
antennomeres subfiliform; pronotum convex, side margins slightly convex;
epipleural margins somewhat parallel in basal half, then rapidly incurved towards
apex. Male Genitalia (Figs. 7, 8): Aedeagus slightly sclerotized; tegmen bilobed
distally, lobes fimbriate; phallic apex digitiform; phallobasic rod large and cordate;
phallobasic apodeme broadly dilated distally.
Variation. The elytral punctations are slightly more pronounced in one specimen
from Acatlan.
Etymology. The trivial name corallinus (5 coral-red) is a Latin adjective. I refer to
the coloration of the forebody of this beetle.
Agaphalera cymatilis, sp. nov.
(Figs. 2, 9, 10, 22)
Holotype U. Mexico, Colima, Lago La Maria, 41009, 22 July 1995, beating Acacia,
J. Rifkind, A. Reifschneider, colls. (LACM).
Paratypes. Seven specimens. Mexico: Colima: Lago La Maria, 22-VII-1995, beatingAcacia, 1250 m, J. Rifkind, A. Reifschneider (WOPC, 1): Jalisco: 12 km S Autlan, 16-
VII-1990, E. Giesbert (WOPC, 1): Nayarit: 15 km N of Chapalilla, 24-VII-1993, beating
Acacia pennatula, oak/pine forest, Rifkind, Bellamy, Reifschneider (WOPC, 1); idem,
25-VII-1993 (JNRC, 2): Jalisco: 12 km S Autlan, 16-VII-1990, E. Giersbert (FSCA, 2).
Diagnosis. See previous species.
Description. Size: Length 5.0 mm; width 1.8 mm. Form (Fig. 22): IntegumentalColor: Antennae (Fig. 2) and terminal palpomeres brown, forebody yellow-brown,
legs brown, elytra, pterothoracic venter, and abdomen dark blue. Integumental
Structure: Cranium and pronotum minutely punctated; elytral surface deeply
punctated, punctations aseriate; antenna capitate, capitulum short and lax, funicular
antennomeres subfiliform; pronotum convex, side margins strongly convex;
epipleural margins somewhat parallel in basal three-fourths, then gradually incurved
towards apex. Male Genitalia (Figs. 9, 10): Aedeagus slightly sclerotized; tegmen
bilobed distally, lobes fimbriate; phallic apex digitiform; phallobasic rod small andcordate; phallobasic apodeme broadly dilated distally.
Variation. The mesoscutellum and legs of one of the paratypes are yellow-brown.
Etymology. The trivial name cymatilis (5 blue) is a Latin adjective. I refer to the
predominantly blue coloration of this beetle.
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF AGAPHALARA OPITZ
1. Pronotum yellow-brown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Pronotum blue-black. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Epipleural margins subparallel; hindbody somewhat rectangulate (Fig. 22)
(Mexico) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Agaphalera cymatilis, sp. nov.
- Epipleural margins subconvex; hindbody somewhat oval (Fig. 21) (Mexico). . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Agaphalera corallina, sp. nov.
3. Elytral humeral angle yellow-brown (Mexico). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agaphalera quadrimaculata (Pic 1939)
- Elytral humeral angle blue-black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Elytral disc with a violaceous tinge, never with yellow macula (Mexico). . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agaphalera janthina (LeConte 1866)
- Elytral disc with blue tinge, often with yellow macula (Mexico). . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agaphalera unimaculata (Pic 1940)
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 253
Loedelia Lucas 1920:380
(Figs. 1, 4–6, 11, 12, 16–18, 20, 23, 24)
Type species. Necrobioides mexicana Gahan 1910:76; Wolcott 1947:88; Corporaal
1950:312; Opitz 2002:280, 2009b:161.
Necrobioides Gahan 1910:76.
Diagnosis. Within Neorthopleurinae, only in members of Loedelia is the denticle of
the ungues acuminate (Fig. 20).
Description. Size: Length 5.0–6.0 mm; width 2.0–3.0 mm. Form (Fig. 1): Oblong
short, robust, deep body, about 2 times longer than broad. Vestiture: Disc of
cranium and pronotum densely vested with stout setae, elytra vested only with 1usetae. Head (Fig. 16): Cranium subspheroid, frons very wide, indented with very
small setiferous punctations, latter widely separated; gula (Fig. 18) very small,
sutures oblique, gular process short, narrow, and minutely forked; labrum short,
medial incision curvate concave, medial tormal processes transverse confluent,
epipharyngeal plate not distinguishable; mandible, body short, anterior, medial, and
posterior dens well developed, penicillus very well-developed; maxilla, laterolacinia
present, terminal palpomere subsecuriform (Fig. 17); labium, terminal palpomere
narrow triangular; eyes small, very finely facetted; antenna (Fig. 4) capitate,
capitulum lax and short. Thorax: Pronotum transverse, convex, side margins evenly
rounded, sculptured with very small round setiferous punctations, prointercoxal
process not expanded distally; pronotal projections short, do not contact
prointercoxal process; elytron sculptured with small circular asetiferous punctations,
latter aseriate, elytral 1u setae always adjacent to asetiferous punctations, 2u setae
absent; epipleural fold expanded in proximal half and extended to elytral distal two-
thirds; metendosternite with very small furcal lamina, furcal anterior plate extended;
legs, tibial spur formula 2-2-2, tarsal pulvillar formula 3-3-3, unguis bifid, basal
denticle acuminate. Abdomen: Aedeagus (Figs. 11, 12) shorter than length of
abdomen, phallobasic lobes profusely fimbriate; apices of spicular fork lateral plates
broadened, spicular apodemes fused together, intraspicular plate minute and rod-
shaped; ovipositor, ventral and dorsal laminae multilobed, laminal rod not present;
distal margin of pygidium and 6th visible sternite rounded, not incised. Alimentary
Canal: Six cryptonephridial Malpighian tubules. Mesodermal Male Internal
Reproductive Organs (Fig. 5): Two pairs of accessory glands, medial pair biramous.
Mesodermal Female Internal Reproductive Organs (Fig. 6): Spermathecal capsule
barrel shaped, well sclerotized, spermathecal gland attached to apex of spermathecal
capsule.
Loedelia westcotti, sp. nov.
(Figs. 11, 12, 23, 24)
Holotype -. Mexico, Baja Calif. SUR, SE Shore Bahia Concepcion, 23-IV-1985,
beat Prosopis in bloom, R. L. Westcott collector (CASC).
Paratypes. Nine specimens. Mexico: Baja California Sur: SE Shore Bahia
Concepcion, 23-IV-1985, beat Prosopis in bloom, R. L. Westcott (JNRC, 1; WFBM,
2; WOPC, 3); idem, 1.2 rd. mi. E Rosario, 5-IX-1988, blacklight, E. G. Riley
(TAMU, 2; WOPC, 1).
Diagnosis. In the members of this species the elytral disc is mostly yellow-brown,
which is unique in the genus.
254 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
Description. Size: Length 5.5 mm; width 2.2 mm. Form (Figs. 23): Integumental
Color: Antennae, tarsi, and terminal palpomeres dark brown, remainder of
integument mostly yellow-brown, and with infuscation on cranial vertex, large area
of pronotal disc, distally on femora, mesepisternum, metepisternum, elytral disc
heavily infuscated at humeral angle, sutural margin near and including mesoscu-
tellum, and before elytral apex. Integumental Structure: Cranium and pronotum
minutely punctated; elytral surface punctations shallow, punctations aseriate,
interstitial spaces arenose; antenna capitate, capitulum short and lax, funicular
antennomeres subfiliform; pronotum convex, side margins slightly convex;
epipleural margins somewhat convex. Male Genitalia (Figs. 11, 12): Aedeagus
slightly sclerotized; tegmen bilobed distally, lobes fimbriate; phallic apex digitiform;
phallobasic rod large and bifid distally.
Variation. The expression of the black infuscations on the elytral and pronotal disc
is very variable. Sometimes this infuscation on the elytra is reduced to small
midbasal macula (Fig. 24).
Etymology. The trivial name is a dedicative epithet to honor Richard L. Westcott
for his many contributions to field Entomology.
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF LOEDELIA LUCAS
1. Pronotum concolorous dark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
- Pronotum bicolorous or completely yellow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Elytral disc concolorous, blue-black often with a violaceous tinge (Mexico). . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia mexicana (Gahan 1910)
- Elytral disc bicolorous, mostly black, with a yellow macula (Mexico). . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia peninsularis Barr 1950
3. Elytral disc mostly yellow-brown (Figs. 23 and 24) (Mexico) . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia westcotti, sp. nov.
- Elytral disc entirely dark colored . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Pronotal disc mostly yellow-brown and with a central spheroid macula
(U.S.A.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia discoidea (LeConte 1881)
- Pronotal disc variously infuscated, infuscation usually extended from
anterior margin of pronotum (Mexico, U.S.A.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loedelia maculicollis (LeConte 1874)
EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS
Perhaps the most outstanding information intrinsic in the phylogenetic hypothesis
of the taxa in this treatise (Fig. 25) is their clear separation into two geographical
components; the Old World genera and the New World genera. Such distributional
and evolutionary relationship evidence suggest that the taxa under consideration
have had an extensive evolutionary history that might have extend back to an era
when the continents were amassed into the great ancient Southern Hemisphere
land mass known as Gondwanaland. The evolution and diversification of these
neorthopleurines are probably linked to ancient angiosperm proliferations and to the
rise of ancient forests of gymnosperms. It is widely known that as a group the
Cleridae is mostly xylophilous (Balduf 1935) and that angiosperms flourished and
radiated throughout Gondwanaland (White 1988). Other discussions that link
ancestral Cleridae to a probable Gondwanan origin is found in Opitz (2003).
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 255
There are two synapotypies (Kavanaugh 1978, Opitz 2007) that link the generic
taxa treated herein to their sister outgroup, a petiolate shape of the post-gular
process and incomplete pronotosternal. The first divergence of the Gondwanan
ancestor (ancestral species A) produced a line of neorthopleurines in which the
ovipositor became greatly lengthened [the outgroup, Dermestoides generic group
(Opitz, in press)]. The second line (ancestral species B) evolved an oblong-short body
and became dichotomously distributed. The Old World group generated taxa
towards ancestor C, in which the epipleuron became inflexed, whereas in the New
World genera the elytral punctations became aseriate. Subsequently ancestor C
proliferated the Romanaeclerus group in which the apex of the tibiae generated bifid
setae. This ancestor also generated progenitor D in which the hind body took on a
more oval shape. Then ancestral species D diverged toward the Allochotes group, in
Figure 25. Phylogenetic diagram of genera.
256 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)
which the humerus became bulgy and the phallic plate spinous, and the Madagascan
Patuleius group, in which the epipleuron became extensively ridged.
The ancestral stock of the New World taxa (ancestral species E) proliferated the
Mexican Agaphalera group, characterized by a large basal denticle and the anterodistal
angle of antennomere 9 and 10 became subacuminate. Ancestor E also generated
ancestor F, which eventually evolved the progenitors of the Loedelia group, in which
the unguis became bifid, and the progenitors of ancestor G. The latter evolved theMexican Kataspinula group, in which the phallic membrane evolved two rows of
spines, and progenitor H. Ancestral species H generated the Lebasiella group. Among
these species, the intraspicular plate was lost and the dorsal plate of the phallobase
became elongated. The monotypic Rifkindius group forms the complementary stock, in
which the tegminal lobes were lost and funicular antennomere 5 enlarged.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My gratitude to John Dorshorst for his review of the manuscript and to Gregory
Zolnerowich (Kansas State University) for providing SEM time.
LITERATURE CITED
Balduf, W. V. 1935. The Bionomics of Entomophagous Coleoptera. John S. Swift, New York, 220 pp.
Barr, W. F. 1950. Contributions towards a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California.No. 12. Coleoptera: Cleridae. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, FourthSeries 24(12):485–519.
Corporaal, J. B. 1950. Cleridae. In: W. D. Hincks (Ed.). Coleopterorum Catalogus Supplementa,Pars 23 (editio secunda). W. Junk, Gravenhage, 373 pp.
Ekis, G. 1977. Classification, phylogeny, and zoogeography of the checkered beetle genus Perilypus(Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 227:1–38.
Fairmaire, L. 1902. Materiaux pour la faune coleopterique de la region malgache. Annales de laSociete Entomologique de France 71:530–568.
Gahan, C. J. 1910. Notes on the Cleridae and descriptions of some new genera and species of thisfamily of Coleoptera. Annals and Magazine Natural History 5(8):55–76.
Goloboff, P. A. 2003. NONA version 2.0. A tree searching program. Privately distributed by theauthor.
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University Press, Urbana, Illinois, 263 pp.Kavanaugh, D. H. 1978. Hennigian phylogenetics in contemporary systematic: principles, methods,
and uses, pp. 139–150. In: Biosystematics in Agriculture. Beltsville Symposia in AgriculturalResearch, 2, Allenheld, Osmun and Company, Halstead Press, New York, New York.
LeConte, J. L. 1866. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part I. Smithsonian MiscellaneousCollection 6(167):1–177.
LeConte, J. L. 1874. Descriptions of new Coleoptera chiefly from the Pacific slope of NorthAmerica. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 5:43–72.
LeConte, J. L. 1881. Descriptions of new species. In: J. L. LeConte & G. H. Horn, Description ofnew species of North American Coleoptera. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science7:74–77.
Lucas, R. 1920. Catalogus alphabeticus generum et subgenerum Coleopterorum orbis terrariumTotius (famil., trib., subtr., sect. incl.) Pars. 1. Archiv fuer Naturgeschite 84 (Abt. A):289–448.
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 797 pp.
Nixon, K. C. 2002. Winclada version 1.00.08. Privatetly published by the author.Nixon, C. N. & J. A. Carpenter. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9:413–426.
Opitz, W. 2002. Family 73. Cleridae Latrielle 1804, pp. 267–280. In: R. H. Arnett Jr, M. C. Thomas,P. E. Skelley & J. H. Frank (Eds.). American Beetles, Volume 2. Boca Raton. CRC Press,Gainesville, xiv + 861 pp.
Opitz, W. 2003. Spermatophores and spermatophore producing internal organs of Cleridae(Coleoptera: Clerinae): Their biological and phylogenetic implications. The ColeopteristsBulletin 57(2):167–190.
2013 OPITZ: TAXONOMY OF NEORTHOPLEURINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) 257
Opitz, W. 2007. Classification, natural history, and evolution of Epiphloeinae (Coleoptera,Cleridae). Part IV. The genera Pyticeroides Kuwert, 1894 and Diapromeces Opitz, 1997.Entomologica Basilensia et Collectionis Frey 29:77–166.
Opitz, W. 2009a. Revision of the African checkered beetle genus Romanaeclerus Winkler, 1960(Coleoptera: Cleridae: Korynetinae). Journal of Afrotropical Zoology 5:53–70.
Opitz, W. 2009b. Classification, natural history, and evolution of Neorthopleurinae subfa.nov.(Coleoptera, Cleridae) Part I. Generic composition of the subfamily and key to genera.Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey 31:135–207.
Opitz, W. 2010. Classification, natural history, phylogeny, and subfamily composition of theCleridae and generic content of the subfamilies (Coleoptera: Cleroidea). EntomologicaBasiliensia et Collectionis Frey 32:31–128.
Opitz, W. (in press). Classification, natural history, and evolution of Neorthopleurinae Opitz(Coleoptera, Cleridae) Part II. The Dermestoides generic group. Giornale Italiano diEntomologia.
Pic, M. 1939. Mutations et nouveautes diverses. Melanges exotico-Entomologiques 71:1–36.Pic, M. 1940. Diagnoses de Coleopteres exotiques. L’Echange, Revue Linneenne 56(482):10–12.Standfuss, M. 1896. Handbuch der palaarktischen Gross-Schmetterlinge fur Forscher und Sammler.
Gustav Fischer, Jena, 392 pp.Tuomikosky, R. 1976. Notes on some principles of phylogenetic systematics. Annales Entomologici
Fennici 33(3):137–147.Westwood, J. O. 1875. Description of a new genus of clerideous Coleoptera from the Malayan
Archipelago. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London Part II, 1852:241–242.White, M. E. 1988. The Greening of Gondwana. Reed Books, New South Wales, 256 pp.Wolcott, A. B. 1947. Catalogue of North American beetles of the family Cleridae. Fieldiana:
Zoology 32(2):61–105.
258 THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 89(4)