Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | muhammad-uzair |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 34
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
1/34
3/17/13
class III malocclusion
)/ )
)/ )
)/ )
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
2/34
3/17/13
Content: 1.introduction 2.etiology 3.skeletal and dental factors
4.occlusal feature
5.classification
6.treatment 7.surgical treatment
8. future innovative techniques for class III treatment
9.Conclusion10.Reference
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
3/34
3/17/13
Introduction
The Skeletal
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
4/34
3/17/13
inter-occlusal relationship with the teeth in the retruded contactposition.The british standards definition of class III incisor relationshipincludes those malocclusions where the lower incisor edge occludesanterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors.Anteroposterior 'sagittal discrepancy in here is less than normal or
possesses a ve vertical relationship, if dentally then the O.J. =1mmor less up to ve, and if a skeletal classIII discrepancy then the ANBangle =1degree and less depend upon severity.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
5/34
3/17/13
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
6/34
3/17/13
Etiology :
1.early closure of the nasomaxillary complexsutures in certain syndromes.
2.hereditary ,small size maxilla and big size
mandible.3.collapsed maxilla for cleft lip and palate
patients.
4.mouth breathing individuals.
5.environmental,collapse of maxilla occur when
extraction of multiple permanent teeth occur
earl in life.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
7/34
3/17/13
Skeletal pattern:
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
8/34
3/17/13
Mandibular, maxillary ,and cranial base factors make acombined :contribution to the underlying classIII skeletalthrough
1.Usually Class III associated with along mandible
2.forward placement of the glenoid fossa positioning themandible more anteriorly
3.short and/or retrognathic maxilla
4.short anterior cranial base or a combination of these.
the vertical relationship of the skeletal bases varies fromincreased to average or reduced and is generally reflectedin the depth of overbite, which may alter depending onthe pattern of facial growth. Where this is vertical rather
than horizontal ,an anterior open bite is likely.Commonly ,a transverse discrepancy exists in the dentalbase relationship because of the narrow maxillary andwider mandibular bases ,although this is often worsened
by the classIII skeletal pattern.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
9/34
3/17/13
SOFT TISSUE:
The soft tissue surrounding play a very minor effect
in the etiology of class III malocclusion whencompared with their effect in class II malocclusion.
Where the lips competent, the lips and tongue induse
retroclination of the lower incisors and prolination ofthe upper incisors (dentoalveolar compensation).
Where the lower anterior facial height is increased
the lower lips are frequently incompetent, with anadaptive tongue thrust on swallowing which may
procline the lower incisors.
In sagittal direction except in sever skeletal III cases
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
10/34
3/17/13
DENTAL FACTORS:
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
11/34
3/17/13
Crowding is more common and more sever inthe upper than in the lower arch ,oftenresulting from the difference in length and
width of the arches. The upper frequently isshort and narrow compared with a longer andwider lower arch.
OCCLUSAL FEATURE:
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
12/34
3/17/13
1.The lower incisor edge lie anterior to thecingulum plateau of the upper incisors, the overjet isreduced or reversed' (british standards institute
classification) 2.The overbite may be increased ,average ,or
reduced. Where the vertical facial proportions areincreased ,there is often an anterior open bite.
3.Frequently, the upper incisors are proclined andthe lower incisors retroclined, compensating for theunderlying classIII skeletal pattern.
4.Upper arch crowding is common, often becauseof a short and narrow dental base, while the lowerarch is more commonly aligned or spaced.
5.Crossbite of the labial and/or buccal segments arecommon resultin from the underl in classIII
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
13/34
3/17/13
THE MAIN VARIANTS IN VE SAGITTAL
OR CL III are:
1. Degree of skeletal discrepancy.2. Degree of improper anterior teeth position and
inclinations that lead to a ve o.j.
3. If there are other discrepancies rather than sagittal
in the other two directions or within the arch.
.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
14/34
3/17/13
Many classifications of severity of class III had been reviewed, theaccepted one as follow:-
1.mild CL III 'dental' :
O.J. is purely dental due to different axial inclination of U/Lanterior teeth or one of them ,O.J.=(0,-1,-2 mm)
2. moderate CLIII 'dento-skeletal' :
In which the cause of the reverse O.J. may be attributed partly tojaws and the other part to teeth together O.J.=
(-1,-2,-3 mm)
3.sever CL III 'SKELETAL' :
In which the cause of the reverse O.J. is a result of improperpositions i.e. the maxilla is retruded and the mandible is protruded
'one of them or both '. in this situation orthognathic surgery is thesolution of this discrepancy with the help of the orthodontist.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
15/34
3/17/13
TREATMENT OF CL III MALOCCLUSION:-
Treatment Planning:
Consider the degree of 1.anteroposterior and vertical
skeletal discrepancy,
2. the potential direction and extent of future facial
growth, 3.incisor inclinations,the amount of overbite, 4.the ability to achieve edgeto-edge incisor relationship, 5.and the degree of upper and lower arch crowding.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
16/34
3/17/13
According to the classification the treatment of type 3 bysurgery while type 1&2 the postural can be treatedorthodontically alone after removing or treating the cause
by:-
1.proclination of upper anterior teeth
2.retroclination of lower anterior teeth
The amount of both movement may be limited oraccepted or one of them .
such movement can be performed by removableappliance via:
R Z i f li i
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
17/34
3/17/13
a. R.Z.springs for proclination or screws . b.Hawley arch for retroclination &also can be
done by fixed appliance
3 th f l iii l ti
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
18/34
3/17/13
3.the use of class iii elastics
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
19/34
3/17/13
That are attached to U/L fixed appliances
extending from the upper molars to lower canines,
that when the patient open and close the mouth
there will be a stretching thus a reciprocal teeth
movement will occur by sliding the upper arch
anteriorly and the lower arch posteriorly.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
20/34
3/17/13
4.Treatment by growth modification:
Myofunctional appliances:-
REVERSE-PULL
HEADGEAR
'trade mark' Chin Cap
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
21/34
3/17/13
Long time ago the age of 8 years was regarded as the
time when an individual meet the orthodontist for the
first time to evaluate his/her condition. Nowadays the
age is 4 years where the orthodontist can predict thatthe patient will develop a malocclusion in the future
and especially CLIII susceptible individuals.
The 'trade mark' Chin Cap is preventive myofunctionalappliance that is used to prevent ,modify or break the
unwanted downward and forward growth of the
mandible by directing the force by the chin cap across
the growth center of the mandible "condyle"back ward
and upward bilaterally. the time elapsed to wear the
chin cap is 12-16 hours per day and should last until
adulthood or late adolescent by the age of 15-16 years.
REVERSE PULL h d Al k f k i
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
22/34
3/17/13
REVERSE-PULL headgear Also known as a face-mask, isused to apply an anteriorly directed force via elastics, on themaxillary teeth and maxilla. Although some have claimedthat this appliance can change the position of maxilla, averycooperative patient is necessary in view of the prolongeddaily wear equired, often over several years. Nevertheless,this technique is occasionally useful in the management ofclass iii malocclusion ,particularly those associated with acleft lip and palate anomaly, and also in cases of hypodontiawhere forward movement of the buccal starting point to usethe chin cap can be done as soon as the lower permanentincisors erupt ,and even we can use it before puberty to
assist treatment of cl iii.segment teeth to close space isdesirable.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
23/34
3/17/13
is one of the series of frankle appliance that is used tocorrect cl iii as soon as possible if the case demands the
use of such appliance. Again it can be used as early as 7
years if the patient can tolerate its use.
In treatment of cl iii the correction of the OB &OJ &the
canine relationship beside the correction of the crowding
&x-bite if present is more important than the correction
of the molar relationship. if an additional malocclusion
feature is associated (compartment A) then the line of
treatment is modified to overcome and treat the casesimultaneously, i.e. post. x-bite ,open bite others.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
24/34
3/17/13
5."postural class III" :
Pre treatment
Si th b d b t th l CL I l ti d th
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
25/34
3/17/13
Since the borders between the normal CL I relation and the
abnormal CL III cases and in such cases a cl I at the
primary dentition and when the eruption of permanent
dentition take place especially the anterior teeth, theyappear edge to edge and then a translocated to a reverse
O.J. relationship, such postural relationship (centric
occlusion not coincident with the centric relation) i.e.
when the dentist guide the mandible to the centric
occlusion only a premature contact occur in the incisors
leaving the posterior teeth with no occlusion and when a
maximum posterior occlusion is needed to grind the foodthe mandible is shifted anteriorly and a reverse O.J. which
is the cross bite.
The treatment in this case is simple if done as earl as
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
26/34
3/17/13
The treatment in this case is simple if done as early as
possible when discovered and give an excellent results by
correcting the reverse O.J. by using a fixed or removable
appliance . In patients presenting with a deep overbite, amandibular Hawley appliance with an anterior labial bow
can be used to prevent forward movement of the lower
incisors during bite jumping. In most cases crossbite
correction is maintained by the overbite, and no retention
appliance is necessary.
Post treatment
Severe Class III skeletal pattern:
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
27/34
3/17/13
Severe Class III skeletal pattern:
Surgical treatment:
the prensece of a reduced overbite or an anterior open bite preclude
orthodontics alone, and surgery is necessary to correct the underlyingskeletal discrepancy. That surgery is almost required if the value for
the ANB angle is below -4 and the inclination of the upper incisors to
the mandibular plane is less than 83*. The cephlometric finding
should be considered and the patient's facial appearance. With thosepatients who have sever skeletal pattern with lack of overbite, a
surgical approach should be explored before any permanent
extractions are carried out, and preferably before any appliance
treatment. The reason for this is that management of class iii
malocclusions by orthodontics alone involves dento-alveolar
compensation for the underlying skeletal pattern.Any dento-alveolar
compensation must first be removed or reduced.
For example if lower premolars are extracted in an attempt to retract
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
28/34
3/17/13
For example, if lower premolars are extracted in an attempt to retract
the lower labial segment but this fails and a surgical approach is
subsequently necessary, the presurgical orthodontic phase will
probably involve proclination of the incisors to a more average
inclination with reopening of the extraction spaces. This is a
frustrating experience for both patient and operator.
The prevalence of class III malocclusion in our community is less
when compared with the class II malocclusion ,it's prevalence from
3% to 7% as a maximum occurrence.
FUTURE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
29/34
3/17/13
FUTURE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR
CLASS III TREATMENT 1.Distraction Osteogenesis to Advance the Maxilla:
Distraction osteogenesis has recently been used to simulate a Le Fort I
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
30/34
3/17/13
Distraction osteogenesis has recently been used to simulate a Le Fort I
maxillary advancement and anterior segmental repositioning. An
incomplete osteotomy placed above the canine and molar roots was
performed through a vestibular incision. Pterygomaxillary disjunction
and dissection of the nasal floor and septum were not performed.
Distraction forces were placed on the maxilla by a reverse-pull
headgear and an intraoral orthopedic appliance to advance the maxilla
8 to 12 mm. An incomplete osteotomy placed above the canine and
molar roots was performed through a vestibular incision.Pterygomaxillary disjunction and dissection of the nasal floor and
septum were not performed. Distraction forces were placed on the
maxilla by a reverse-pull headgear and an intraoral orthopedic
appliance to advance the maxilla 8 to 12 mm.
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
31/34
3/17/13
2.Dental Onplants to Provide Absolute Anchorage for Maxillary
Protraction:
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
32/34
3/17/13
One of the limitations in
maxillary protraction withtooth-borne anchorage
devices such as expansion
appliances and palatalarches is the loss of dental
anchorage (i e C l i
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
33/34
3/17/13
Conclusion: At the end of this period in all cases the
correction of anterior crossbite and the
elimination of the mandibular displacement
were obtained, The goals of this approachare as follows:
1.prevents unfavourable growth especially
mandibular protrusion; irreversible, soft
tissue 2.prevents habits such as
bruxism;
7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01
34/34
3/17/13
Thankyou.
thankyou.