+ All Categories
Home > Documents > classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: muhammad-uzair
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 34

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    1/34

    3/17/13

    class III malocclusion

    )/ )

    )/ )

    )/ )

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    2/34

    3/17/13

    Content: 1.introduction 2.etiology 3.skeletal and dental factors

    4.occlusal feature

    5.classification

    6.treatment 7.surgical treatment

    8. future innovative techniques for class III treatment

    9.Conclusion10.Reference

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    3/34

    3/17/13

    Introduction

    The Skeletal

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    4/34

    3/17/13

    inter-occlusal relationship with the teeth in the retruded contactposition.The british standards definition of class III incisor relationshipincludes those malocclusions where the lower incisor edge occludesanterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors.Anteroposterior 'sagittal discrepancy in here is less than normal or

    possesses a ve vertical relationship, if dentally then the O.J. =1mmor less up to ve, and if a skeletal classIII discrepancy then the ANBangle =1degree and less depend upon severity.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    5/34

    3/17/13

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    6/34

    3/17/13

    Etiology :

    1.early closure of the nasomaxillary complexsutures in certain syndromes.

    2.hereditary ,small size maxilla and big size

    mandible.3.collapsed maxilla for cleft lip and palate

    patients.

    4.mouth breathing individuals.

    5.environmental,collapse of maxilla occur when

    extraction of multiple permanent teeth occur

    earl in life.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    7/34

    3/17/13

    Skeletal pattern:

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    8/34

    3/17/13

    Mandibular, maxillary ,and cranial base factors make acombined :contribution to the underlying classIII skeletalthrough

    1.Usually Class III associated with along mandible

    2.forward placement of the glenoid fossa positioning themandible more anteriorly

    3.short and/or retrognathic maxilla

    4.short anterior cranial base or a combination of these.

    the vertical relationship of the skeletal bases varies fromincreased to average or reduced and is generally reflectedin the depth of overbite, which may alter depending onthe pattern of facial growth. Where this is vertical rather

    than horizontal ,an anterior open bite is likely.Commonly ,a transverse discrepancy exists in the dentalbase relationship because of the narrow maxillary andwider mandibular bases ,although this is often worsened

    by the classIII skeletal pattern.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    9/34

    3/17/13

    SOFT TISSUE:

    The soft tissue surrounding play a very minor effect

    in the etiology of class III malocclusion whencompared with their effect in class II malocclusion.

    Where the lips competent, the lips and tongue induse

    retroclination of the lower incisors and prolination ofthe upper incisors (dentoalveolar compensation).

    Where the lower anterior facial height is increased

    the lower lips are frequently incompetent, with anadaptive tongue thrust on swallowing which may

    procline the lower incisors.

    In sagittal direction except in sever skeletal III cases

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    10/34

    3/17/13

    DENTAL FACTORS:

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    11/34

    3/17/13

    Crowding is more common and more sever inthe upper than in the lower arch ,oftenresulting from the difference in length and

    width of the arches. The upper frequently isshort and narrow compared with a longer andwider lower arch.

    OCCLUSAL FEATURE:

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    12/34

    3/17/13

    1.The lower incisor edge lie anterior to thecingulum plateau of the upper incisors, the overjet isreduced or reversed' (british standards institute

    classification) 2.The overbite may be increased ,average ,or

    reduced. Where the vertical facial proportions areincreased ,there is often an anterior open bite.

    3.Frequently, the upper incisors are proclined andthe lower incisors retroclined, compensating for theunderlying classIII skeletal pattern.

    4.Upper arch crowding is common, often becauseof a short and narrow dental base, while the lowerarch is more commonly aligned or spaced.

    5.Crossbite of the labial and/or buccal segments arecommon resultin from the underl in classIII

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    13/34

    3/17/13

    THE MAIN VARIANTS IN VE SAGITTAL

    OR CL III are:

    1. Degree of skeletal discrepancy.2. Degree of improper anterior teeth position and

    inclinations that lead to a ve o.j.

    3. If there are other discrepancies rather than sagittal

    in the other two directions or within the arch.

    .

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    14/34

    3/17/13

    Many classifications of severity of class III had been reviewed, theaccepted one as follow:-

    1.mild CL III 'dental' :

    O.J. is purely dental due to different axial inclination of U/Lanterior teeth or one of them ,O.J.=(0,-1,-2 mm)

    2. moderate CLIII 'dento-skeletal' :

    In which the cause of the reverse O.J. may be attributed partly tojaws and the other part to teeth together O.J.=

    (-1,-2,-3 mm)

    3.sever CL III 'SKELETAL' :

    In which the cause of the reverse O.J. is a result of improperpositions i.e. the maxilla is retruded and the mandible is protruded

    'one of them or both '. in this situation orthognathic surgery is thesolution of this discrepancy with the help of the orthodontist.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    15/34

    3/17/13

    TREATMENT OF CL III MALOCCLUSION:-

    Treatment Planning:

    Consider the degree of 1.anteroposterior and vertical

    skeletal discrepancy,

    2. the potential direction and extent of future facial

    growth, 3.incisor inclinations,the amount of overbite, 4.the ability to achieve edgeto-edge incisor relationship, 5.and the degree of upper and lower arch crowding.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    16/34

    3/17/13

    According to the classification the treatment of type 3 bysurgery while type 1&2 the postural can be treatedorthodontically alone after removing or treating the cause

    by:-

    1.proclination of upper anterior teeth

    2.retroclination of lower anterior teeth

    The amount of both movement may be limited oraccepted or one of them .

    such movement can be performed by removableappliance via:

    R Z i f li i

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    17/34

    3/17/13

    a. R.Z.springs for proclination or screws . b.Hawley arch for retroclination &also can be

    done by fixed appliance

    3 th f l iii l ti

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    18/34

    3/17/13

    3.the use of class iii elastics

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    19/34

    3/17/13

    That are attached to U/L fixed appliances

    extending from the upper molars to lower canines,

    that when the patient open and close the mouth

    there will be a stretching thus a reciprocal teeth

    movement will occur by sliding the upper arch

    anteriorly and the lower arch posteriorly.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    20/34

    3/17/13

    4.Treatment by growth modification:

    Myofunctional appliances:-

    REVERSE-PULL

    HEADGEAR

    'trade mark' Chin Cap

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    21/34

    3/17/13

    Long time ago the age of 8 years was regarded as the

    time when an individual meet the orthodontist for the

    first time to evaluate his/her condition. Nowadays the

    age is 4 years where the orthodontist can predict thatthe patient will develop a malocclusion in the future

    and especially CLIII susceptible individuals.

    The 'trade mark' Chin Cap is preventive myofunctionalappliance that is used to prevent ,modify or break the

    unwanted downward and forward growth of the

    mandible by directing the force by the chin cap across

    the growth center of the mandible "condyle"back ward

    and upward bilaterally. the time elapsed to wear the

    chin cap is 12-16 hours per day and should last until

    adulthood or late adolescent by the age of 15-16 years.

    REVERSE PULL h d Al k f k i

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    22/34

    3/17/13

    REVERSE-PULL headgear Also known as a face-mask, isused to apply an anteriorly directed force via elastics, on themaxillary teeth and maxilla. Although some have claimedthat this appliance can change the position of maxilla, averycooperative patient is necessary in view of the prolongeddaily wear equired, often over several years. Nevertheless,this technique is occasionally useful in the management ofclass iii malocclusion ,particularly those associated with acleft lip and palate anomaly, and also in cases of hypodontiawhere forward movement of the buccal starting point to usethe chin cap can be done as soon as the lower permanentincisors erupt ,and even we can use it before puberty to

    assist treatment of cl iii.segment teeth to close space isdesirable.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    23/34

    3/17/13

    is one of the series of frankle appliance that is used tocorrect cl iii as soon as possible if the case demands the

    use of such appliance. Again it can be used as early as 7

    years if the patient can tolerate its use.

    In treatment of cl iii the correction of the OB &OJ &the

    canine relationship beside the correction of the crowding

    &x-bite if present is more important than the correction

    of the molar relationship. if an additional malocclusion

    feature is associated (compartment A) then the line of

    treatment is modified to overcome and treat the casesimultaneously, i.e. post. x-bite ,open bite others.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    24/34

    3/17/13

    5."postural class III" :

    Pre treatment

    Si th b d b t th l CL I l ti d th

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    25/34

    3/17/13

    Since the borders between the normal CL I relation and the

    abnormal CL III cases and in such cases a cl I at the

    primary dentition and when the eruption of permanent

    dentition take place especially the anterior teeth, theyappear edge to edge and then a translocated to a reverse

    O.J. relationship, such postural relationship (centric

    occlusion not coincident with the centric relation) i.e.

    when the dentist guide the mandible to the centric

    occlusion only a premature contact occur in the incisors

    leaving the posterior teeth with no occlusion and when a

    maximum posterior occlusion is needed to grind the foodthe mandible is shifted anteriorly and a reverse O.J. which

    is the cross bite.

    The treatment in this case is simple if done as earl as

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    26/34

    3/17/13

    The treatment in this case is simple if done as early as

    possible when discovered and give an excellent results by

    correcting the reverse O.J. by using a fixed or removable

    appliance . In patients presenting with a deep overbite, amandibular Hawley appliance with an anterior labial bow

    can be used to prevent forward movement of the lower

    incisors during bite jumping. In most cases crossbite

    correction is maintained by the overbite, and no retention

    appliance is necessary.

    Post treatment

    Severe Class III skeletal pattern:

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    27/34

    3/17/13

    Severe Class III skeletal pattern:

    Surgical treatment:

    the prensece of a reduced overbite or an anterior open bite preclude

    orthodontics alone, and surgery is necessary to correct the underlyingskeletal discrepancy. That surgery is almost required if the value for

    the ANB angle is below -4 and the inclination of the upper incisors to

    the mandibular plane is less than 83*. The cephlometric finding

    should be considered and the patient's facial appearance. With thosepatients who have sever skeletal pattern with lack of overbite, a

    surgical approach should be explored before any permanent

    extractions are carried out, and preferably before any appliance

    treatment. The reason for this is that management of class iii

    malocclusions by orthodontics alone involves dento-alveolar

    compensation for the underlying skeletal pattern.Any dento-alveolar

    compensation must first be removed or reduced.

    For example if lower premolars are extracted in an attempt to retract

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    28/34

    3/17/13

    For example, if lower premolars are extracted in an attempt to retract

    the lower labial segment but this fails and a surgical approach is

    subsequently necessary, the presurgical orthodontic phase will

    probably involve proclination of the incisors to a more average

    inclination with reopening of the extraction spaces. This is a

    frustrating experience for both patient and operator.

    The prevalence of class III malocclusion in our community is less

    when compared with the class II malocclusion ,it's prevalence from

    3% to 7% as a maximum occurrence.

    FUTURE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    29/34

    3/17/13

    FUTURE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR

    CLASS III TREATMENT 1.Distraction Osteogenesis to Advance the Maxilla:

    Distraction osteogenesis has recently been used to simulate a Le Fort I

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    30/34

    3/17/13

    Distraction osteogenesis has recently been used to simulate a Le Fort I

    maxillary advancement and anterior segmental repositioning. An

    incomplete osteotomy placed above the canine and molar roots was

    performed through a vestibular incision. Pterygomaxillary disjunction

    and dissection of the nasal floor and septum were not performed.

    Distraction forces were placed on the maxilla by a reverse-pull

    headgear and an intraoral orthopedic appliance to advance the maxilla

    8 to 12 mm. An incomplete osteotomy placed above the canine and

    molar roots was performed through a vestibular incision.Pterygomaxillary disjunction and dissection of the nasal floor and

    septum were not performed. Distraction forces were placed on the

    maxilla by a reverse-pull headgear and an intraoral orthopedic

    appliance to advance the maxilla 8 to 12 mm.

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    31/34

    3/17/13

    2.Dental Onplants to Provide Absolute Anchorage for Maxillary

    Protraction:

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    32/34

    3/17/13

    One of the limitations in

    maxillary protraction withtooth-borne anchorage

    devices such as expansion

    appliances and palatalarches is the loss of dental

    anchorage (i e C l i

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    33/34

    3/17/13

    Conclusion: At the end of this period in all cases the

    correction of anterior crossbite and the

    elimination of the mandibular displacement

    were obtained, The goals of this approachare as follows:

    1.prevents unfavourable growth especially

    mandibular protrusion; irreversible, soft

    tissue 2.prevents habits such as

    bruxism;

  • 7/29/2019 classiii-101011102143-phpapp01

    34/34

    3/17/13

    Thankyou.

    thankyou.


Recommended