+ All Categories
Home > Engineering > Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Date post: 16-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: lloyds-register-energy
View: 942 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Working together for a safer world Lloyd’s Register Energy Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing How technology and innovation drive optimisation AND safety. Andy Imrie - Business Development Manager
Transcript
Page 1: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Working together for a safer world

Lloyd’s Register Energy Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

How technology and innovation drive optimisation AND safety.

Andy Imrie - Business Development Manager

Page 2: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

Prescriptive - API Q1 9th Edition

• The organization shall maintain a documented procedure for identification and traceability while the product is under control of the organization as required by the organization, the customer, and the applicable product specifications, throughout the product realization process, including applicable delivery and post-delivery activities.

• The procedure shall include requirements for maintenance or replacement of identification and/or traceability marks.

• Records of identification and traceability shall be maintained. • Records, including those originating from outsourced activities, shall be

established and controlled to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and the organization's quality management system.

• Records of outsourced activities shall be maintained – Control of Cast Transfer

Page 3: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 – Inspection documents for Metallic Products

• The use of the EN 10204:2004 standard for inspection

documents for metallic products has become widespread, even outside of the European Union.

• EN 10204 was first published in 1991, based on the German standard DIN 50049.

• It is the best solution we have for the certification of materials at present, however it’s not perfect.

• Since its introduction the supply chain for steel has become more complex. Smaller manufacturers are using steel stockholders or “stockists,” as they are the more cost-effective solution for relatively smaller orders of material certified to EN 10204.

Page 4: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 – Inspection documents for Metallic Products

• This standard specifies the different types of inspection documents supplied to the purchaser

• Documents are in accordance with the requirements of the order, for the delivery of all metallic products, e.g. – plates – sheets – bars – forgings – castings …whatever their method of production.

Page 5: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 – Inspection documents for Metallic Products

• This standard may also apply to non-metallic products – not assemblies

• This document is used in conjunction with the product specifications which specify the technical delivery conditions of the products – does not specify an acceptance criteria

Page 6: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 – Inspection certificate 3.1 “type 3.1”

• Document issued by the manufacturer in which he declares that the products supplied are in compliance with the requirements of the order and in which he supplies test results.

• The document is validated by the manufacturer’s authorised inspection representative, independent of the manufacturing department.

TYPE 3.1

Manufacturer’s rep

Page 7: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 – Inspection certificate 3.2 “type 3.2”

• Document prepared by the manufacturer’s authorised inspection representative (Third Party) independent of – the manufacturing department and

– either the purchaser’s authorized inspection

representative

– or the inspector.

• So how should this work?

TYPE 3.2

Page 8: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Stockist vs. manufacturer?

• Function of the Independent Third Party (ITP): – To verify the material’s:

» Traceability

» Properties

– The ITP’s activity should “add value” to the material / product

Page 9: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification –

• Manufacturer?

• No “mechanical property changing” operations. • Stockist has not “manufactured” the material – certification “to the intent

of” EN 10204 type 3.2

Steelmaker Stockist Customer

Saw Drill

Grind Turn

Page 10: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

• Manufacturer?

• Mechanical property changing operations carried out. • Stockist has “manufactured” the material – certification “in accordance with” EN 10204 3.2 • Material must be traceable throughout Stockist’s operations.

Steelmaker Stockist Customer

Forge Heat treat

Extrude Wire draw

Page 11: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

• Exploding the myths: – Material 3.2 certified at the steelmaker – nothing else to do. – Complicated supply chain – traceability

– Solution – ITP involvement at every stage of supply chain – cast transfer.

• Traceability

Steelmaker Stockist A Stockist B Customer

Page 12: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

• Exploding the myths: – Can’t the ITP carry out a “paperwork review” for 3.2 certification?

– No – does this verify…

– Traceability?

– Properties?

– Does this “add value” to the material? • ITP acting as an expensive “spell-checker”

Page 13: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

• Exploding the myths: – Ask the Test House to add “EN 10204 3.2”

to their Test Report.

– Irrelevant – Test House is not the manufacturer

– Only causes confusion in the industry

TYPE 3.2

Page 14: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

Page 15: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register Energy

EN 10204:2004 Type 3.2 Certification

• Conclusions: – Effective material verification and traceability is ensured by:

• ITP inspection process • Sensible interpretation of standard

– Gives assurance to customer and adds value to product

– 3.2 Factsheet – www.lr.org/type-32

Page 16: Clearing up material traceability: Confusion and myths in oil and gas manufacturing

Lloyd’s Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates. Copyright © Lloyd’s Register Energy. 2015. A member of the Lloyd’s Register group.

Andy Imrie Business Development Manager T +44 (0)7816 644 406 E [email protected] Lloyd’s Register Energy 1 Trinity Park, Bickenhill Lane, Birmingham, B37 7ES

Working together for a safer world


Recommended